I think in the toolbox, instead of shipping your default dotfiles, you should give an option to customize the options in dotfiles. For example, it should be like checkbox for the aliases you want, select your binding (vim or emacs), histfilesize and explain what each options do. I think if this tool is targeted for new users, rather than shipping a default configuration you should keep it as an option and also in advanced customizations, make an option to customize each and every option. In that way, new users will feel welcome to learn how things work under the hood. Also, I want to emphasize that every single person under the sun has different preferences. Anyway, Great work btw. Edit 1: I almost forgot to mention it. Make your scripts idempotent. The way you are doing things in bash is very "HACKY". In the long term, this is gonna create a lot of trouble.
@opposite3427 ай бұрын
adding on to this, he should look at how zsh does it with zsh-newuser-install. It gives quite a nice UI and a quite a number of options you can change even without installing other plugins.
@Nunya582947 ай бұрын
@@opposite342Maybe I should take a look into zsh. Been using Bash for a long time though
@bulldoser26107 ай бұрын
@@opposite342 I just gave an example of how elaborate the advanced customization options should be. What I tried to imply that instead of shipping dotfiles from a github repo, @ChurchTechTalks should let people create their on=wn dotfiles the way that want.
@ShadowWizard-sb8hu7 ай бұрын
lets go this projects gonna be awesome
@hardik88t5 ай бұрын
Amazing 🤩
@JohannesDavidsen20247 ай бұрын
For me you are some sort of developer, so I want to say you're System dev. 👌
@injuneer79427 ай бұрын
Windows toolbox is fantastic .... any projection of when your first version of the Linux toolbox will be released???
@TitusTechTalk7 ай бұрын
I'm thinking July we should have a usable beta version.
@rabbitgames19717 ай бұрын
Hey, Chris! I'm (obviously) just starting to get into Linux. Past couple of weeks or so. Anyhow, if I understand correctly, the Linux Kernel holds drivers inside of itself. I'm curious if an install media (USB, etc. as long as it's writeable) can be configured to ping all hardware on a system - just as it would to install drivers in the first place - and create an inventory list by creating a folder on the install media specific to that machine and putting that inventory list in there. Then search the Kernel for appropriate drivers and moving those drivers into the folder. Then, popup a menu like your Windows tool that shows popular software so your choices can also be added to the inventory. THEN, compile a build that has a Kernel with only the necessary software that's absolutely necessary to run the operating system (Debian, for example), plus the software choices you made: Thorium as your browser, Notepad ++ for text editor, etc. I'm just curious if an Installer can be configured to do that on the fly, and then install accordingly. Thanks!
@paultapping95107 ай бұрын
I think you might just have invented Gentoo 😂
@rabbitgames19717 ай бұрын
@@paultapping9510 Is that what Gentoo does?
@paultapping95107 ай бұрын
if I've understood what you want (a kernel compiled exclusively to your specific hardware configuration) and I've understood Gentoo correctly, neither of which is a given, then yes, I'm pretty sure gentoo does exactly what you're after. Worth looking into certainly, though my understanding is it's a very complex distro.
@leonller357 ай бұрын
Do you use mislav/hub for git in the cli? Can recommend it for doing more advanced stuff like setting the status of an issue or creating one from the cli.
@MrElCojones7 ай бұрын
do i learn here how to integrate toolbox installations to wine game relations? my wine systems don't work, the dbus and gaming doesn't communicate. i didn't find a tutorial yet where to install wine packages to grant dbus accesses to wine and the hardware. the games don't even run the dedicated gpu even when the setting is enabled. what's necessary to fix gpu driver wine issues? how do i run hybrid gpu? how does steam run dbus and xdg runtime correct?
@MrElCojones7 ай бұрын
i'm running fedora 40 btw. a ostree based operating system
@MrElCojones7 ай бұрын
i have rpm fusion repository installed already. i'm using yum (dnf), but fedora, fedora updates and rpm fusion don't grant any further dbus session and window as desktop system, which integrate conclusively for wine emulation
@akdisrael7 ай бұрын
i'm dreaming of this linux toolbox from the beginning when winutil exists
@nils-erikolsson35397 ай бұрын
Eat one small bucket of ice cream coming in and you cut down the recovery time.
@linuxstreamer89107 ай бұрын
when i first jumped on linux i removed my windows os but i got lucky i have a all amd system & other software i used have a linux version
@HisVirusness7 ай бұрын
What's the difference between Vim and Neovim?
@TitusTechTalk7 ай бұрын
One uses vim language (vim) and neovim uses lua for config. neovim can use vim language as well, but it gives access to a lot more modern extensions.
@howdy20537 ай бұрын
Haven’t watched through, but ctt-Linux-toolbox
@donaldwilliams68217 ай бұрын
Re: GNU/Linux haha So true. Linux would not be where it is today without GNU tools. Fact. But same for all the other parts. By that logic is should be called GNU/LINUS. ;)
@freidhofkyle7 ай бұрын
Well eh a good chunk of Linux uses GNU as the userland. We just call it Linux because it’s easier than saying. GNU/Linux I mean I don’t really care I call it Linux. However GNU is a major part of the system.
@oglothenerd7 ай бұрын
You need to learn Rust.
@TitusTechTalk7 ай бұрын
I'll get there.
@oglothenerd7 ай бұрын
@@TitusTechTalk Okay, this stream made me cringe so many times! 😭
@jols48086 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing! Been really eyeing nixos, I have been maining Arch for a few months or so (I use Arch btw), so maybe I need more time beforeni make a what I would call major distro hop. The idea of having every declarednin a couple of files is appealing 🫠