Really well done. I am familiar with many of the DAC technologies, and I was impressed with the quality and simplicity of your explanations and learned some interesting nuances. Both this video for solvent-based DAC and the one you did on sorbent-based DAC capture the essence of it. Great job explaining engineering processes in simple terms to democratize the tech! And curious to see more as you might deep-dive on electro-chemical methods as well in the near future?
@ItsBloodyScience3 жыл бұрын
Love the channel. Could you do a video on the Verdox technique too? Is that the third main method of DAC?
@ikirigin2 жыл бұрын
It's important to put numbers in perspective. The US emits 5B tons CO2 and generates 15000PJ of electricity. ~11GJ/tCO2 means DAC of that CO2 requires 3.6X the electric energy currently used.
@SussyBacca Жыл бұрын
Thanks for calculating. ❤
@fintanparsons9741 Жыл бұрын
This is great
@hichemichou72104 жыл бұрын
Could you please specfic the temperature needed to activate the reaction between CO2 and KOH ? and the pressure also? My second question is: if we have a gas steam contains 90% of CO2 and 10% of CO, is this technique still suitable to separate them, or it's too costly in energy ? thank you in advance for your answer.
@mjkeith87483 жыл бұрын
Two key questions: 1) So the need for 8.2 Mt/year of water seems concerning, no? 2) Are you familiar how Global Thermostat goes about capturing CO2? They make it sound like their approach is ahead of the pack.