Lisp Programming in 2024?

[@h0stI13]

I wrote a macro ifx which lets you use the infix notation like (ifx x + (y - z) * t) and it's very simplistic in the sense that it doesn't support operator precedence and I think it's good that it's that way because it still remains very close to the lisp philosophy of using parentheses to separate things. And it's also very easy to use and a nice touch to the language for those who can't stand the prefix notation.

[@gregben]

Yes, you can format your lisp code and add comments so its structure becomes clear, and pleasing to your (and maybe other's) eye. And of course you can write lots of little functions to avoid sprawl.

[@Charity-mc3og]

your content is always spot on, thanks for being so reliable!

[@alessandroporfirio1910]

Please, do more content on Lisp!

[@gregben]

I'm here because I just don't like all the difficult syntax of bash. Yes, for very simple stuff, bash is okay, but it gets to be a nightmare pretty quickly. Lisp is syntactically very simple, but you can do anything with it and extend it any way you want. And today, computers are so fast that execution speed often doesn't matter much.

[@john-schumandr]

you mean common lisp?