Llumar Air Blue 80 vs Flexfilm

[@valeriegould1769]

I LOVE this testing! Thank you!

[@CKPHH]

Ralph so the Air 80 blocks more UV than Nanoflex? I can see the uv card is a little more purple than the llummar

[@FlexFilmPlus]

Looks like it if you trust that uv card made in China.

[@njself555]

Any way you could do a video on Rayno film? Thanks!

[@jremeee1599]

i want a roll of this to tint my windshield. can a consumer buy it Ralph?

[@FlexFilmPlus]

Yes. Go to www.flexfilmstore.com Click on menu. Then click on automotive or click on patterns to get a pre cut pattern.

[@yobingbongyah4676]

Any way you could a video on Xpel XR Plus? Didn't think so

[@AZDESERT2024]

Most States require a minimum 70% light transmission through the front windshield. OEM windshields block a small amount of light . Using a 70 or 72 film would drop the light transmission through the windshield below 70% making the installation illegal. The Llumar 80 keeps the installation Legal. The 70 and 72 would be ok for the side and rear glass, if you want an OEM look while blocking UV rays.

[@hawaiiguy1]

not true with using llumar 80 on present vehicles...it STILL falls below the minimum 70% light transmission...tried on our '10 honda cr-v, and tested at 69.5, so not able to install. Tried on another vehicle, a recent mazda 3, still falls below 70%. The Air 90 DOES pass the minimum, as tested with the meters it read at 79.5% In Hawaii, standards are enforced...

[@AZDESERT2024]

Because you live in the Liberal utopia of Hawaii. Live with the government you elected. Most states are 70% with a 3% +/- , meaning it can read as low as 67% because light meters are not exact .

[@hawaiiguy1]

@@AZDESERT2024 no plus minus 3% tolerance ,this respected tint dealer would not install the film.