ive done a whole semester on this topic and this video has explained it to me the best that fast,... wow... thanks
@oven883 жыл бұрын
strange how most of us here are paying to take courses supposed to teach us this but we're resorting to free videos to actually learn the content... makes you think about the future of modern academic institutions
@roshanidevi31952 жыл бұрын
700o
@chandrakantmondal37482 жыл бұрын
Lu l
@BobbyKarnavas Жыл бұрын
That's why they charge so much, they know in the future the price of education will go down - expectations of the future impact price levels
@acreARES Жыл бұрын
Strange how most of our paid courses are referring us to this, and I still don't understand it
@0to100RealQuick-f3i Жыл бұрын
so true
@jeffy14111 жыл бұрын
That's the best explanation I got about IS - LM curve on the whole web. And believe me I read/viewed a lot of articles/videos and the CFA books. Thx a lot
@highdiary7 жыл бұрын
jeffy141 the CFA book is garbage. hence why I'm on here lol
@willbellick5 жыл бұрын
@@highdiary Lol, taking level 1 this summer and I am here exactly for the same reason.
@sehrishrazvi47325 жыл бұрын
@@willbellick hey, But what is said here seems to contradict the books...
@Otiis10 жыл бұрын
One week until my final exam in macro economics and I´m pretty sure that these videos are the things that´s gonna save my ass! Thanks a lot Khan Academy from Sweden!
@heavymetalrox2688 жыл бұрын
One week? I got one day... LOL
@andriusbaziuk43318 жыл бұрын
3 hrs left, wish me luck :D
@jingadom8 жыл бұрын
Andrius Baziuk how did it go?
@moi97096 жыл бұрын
@@@jingadom R.I.P. Andrius Baziuk
@foodCamp45454 жыл бұрын
@@heavymetalrox268 how was the test?
@TheonlyIsaac075 жыл бұрын
My goodness who would have thought that an online video teaches you things better than my macro professors at Warwick University - one of Britains top economics universities
@Scrungge4 жыл бұрын
That's why Khan has 6M subscribers :)
@MrCryingDragon2 жыл бұрын
Same here at LSE. My god.
@anonymousgamerfifa126 жыл бұрын
This just saved me hours of toiling over hastily scribbled notes! Thanks a lot!
@samriddhaguha63773 жыл бұрын
Last night before exam🙃
@Jorghee3168 жыл бұрын
Honestly saved my ass, best textbook in the market didnt even mention half the info you provided.
@comedytoonsHQ8 ай бұрын
same hope this question comes in my exam in the next 4hrs😂
@maedehmotamedian9232 Жыл бұрын
I've been struggling with learning macroeconomics. But thanks to this talented teacher I'm not worried for my exam tomorrow
@shiminli32162 жыл бұрын
can't believe I'm watching khan since I was in year 8 and now I'm in university still watching it , he is really a legend in teaching.
@abdallahabdelbary57473 жыл бұрын
Does this guy realize he’s going to heaven?
@Josephagius2107704 жыл бұрын
Very simple explanation which I will recommend to my students for revision purposes.
@zutshi75835 жыл бұрын
Thank you Khan Academy for such a high quality content! You are loosing on consumer surplus by uploading it for free ;).
@jin37915 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot from korea. Though I can't fully understand this video, it really helped me finish my highschool project.
@andreasmadsen62503 жыл бұрын
Hey man, you have a whole lot of great videos all the way from Kenyes to the IS-LM model, and it seems like they are mostly made in som kind of chronological order. However I can't seem to find a playlist with all the videos in the correct order. Any way you could point med to this, if it exists, create one, or maybe just give a list of the correct order to watch these videos? Thx in advance!
@kongslark5 жыл бұрын
Idk man when i hear the way u pronounced the LM curve at 2:06 it always remind me the samuel.L.Jackson :"Honey,Where is my supersuit?"
@Prinxali11 жыл бұрын
Great video! Just a small question - how exactly are the 2 curves LM and IS constraints?
@sophiali81747 жыл бұрын
the explanation for such a difficult concept is so easy to understand!!
@kvs1231003 жыл бұрын
How brilliantly he explained it.... I'm learning this for cfa level 1.. hats off 👏
@G483F33LY8 жыл бұрын
As good as this guy is at explaining stuff (and he is, trust me), I feel like I still got it better from my professor, and that guy is an absolute boss on IS-LM-FX.
@behindtheline4011 жыл бұрын
yes! its one of the 3 ways to look at it. aggregated production, aggregated income, or something else i forget about now haha
@asmabakka76752 жыл бұрын
Hi guys can you please add the subtitle in french I can understand all of that 😟please thank you so much
@leekevin1193 Жыл бұрын
the best-explained tutorial of IS-LM model.
@LossztYT Жыл бұрын
I didn’t understand his link between Low levels of GDP, which will lead invariably to low levels of saving, but then relates it to low levels of interest? There seems to be some missing link there but I can’t find it 😔. Is it because banks want to attract more customers so interest rates are set high deliberately for that reason?
@jeq7426 жыл бұрын
very good explanation! thank you so much!
@elifbayramogluu2 жыл бұрын
this was very helpful thanks a lot!
@felicerylander14877 жыл бұрын
Great videos! Its very pedagogical and a plus is that you have a great voice to listen to! :)
@akhileshbajpai765 Жыл бұрын
I must mention that the videos in the playlist are not in proper sequence.
@sagharkhalili29594 жыл бұрын
I had a question what happens to unemployment rate when consumers use more cash?
@antoniafrank61922 жыл бұрын
Wow thank you so much!
@darkacademiax_2 жыл бұрын
under what circumstances would a IS curve be vertical? Closed or Open economy? I got this question I got wrong on my midterm
@promitamukherjeeEcoNAC2 жыл бұрын
If investment is perfectly insensitive to rate of interest, I. E dI/dr becomes 0, equation of IS becomes Y=C(y) +I So, dY/dr=O along the is curve In other words, following a change in r there will be no change in investment which in turn will leave the aggregate demand unaffected. This, IS becomes vertical.
@jaspermj.22144 жыл бұрын
Why am i only just watching these the night before
@abafizzychannel96282 жыл бұрын
Pls can't find the Is part
@heyyyyy111110 жыл бұрын
Great video bud thank you for this
@gynendrabhandari11062 жыл бұрын
Price of money is interest rate
@ChristianDG214 жыл бұрын
Which software are you using ?
@adriann.perwira38896 жыл бұрын
Thanks, Phil Dunphy
@divya28582 жыл бұрын
why am I paying thousands of dollars to study in a top university when I learn the same thing in a better way from Khan academy?
@jeanjasmine5 жыл бұрын
Then that GDP is a nominal one, isn’t it?
@starlord60884 жыл бұрын
So we just keep printing money then....
@MegaMilkshakeLive9 жыл бұрын
@vogelszijnleijk The X axis can represent real GDP in the short run as prices are held constant.
@ivanmeno3 жыл бұрын
Everybody's in the comments be like i have like a week till exams. Me being no exception!
@anjanaePR12 жыл бұрын
when you say real GDP...(Y) is also know as level of income or income????
@magigegeofrey45074 жыл бұрын
How can interest rate increase with increase in money supply
@adekunleadekoya3 жыл бұрын
Rightward shift of money supply curve, i.e. an increase in money supply, holding all other factors constant, would reduce interest rate.
@alexanderchernik25385 жыл бұрын
yo guys do u do private tutoring?
@startupculture8557 жыл бұрын
thank you
@abhipudi8 жыл бұрын
How do interest rates drive planned investment? High interest rates, less investment, why is that so?
@MannSaab_20218 жыл бұрын
people will take more loans for investment if interest rates are low !
@abdulhai938 жыл бұрын
abhishek jain logically speaking, a higher interest rate means more people are willing to save because the return on their savings is high. but because interest is high less people want to borrow so investment will be low
@elkc43552 жыл бұрын
Mhmm love the voice
@magnaequletia7 жыл бұрын
Allah razı Çok faydalı oldu
@xihongshichaojidan2 жыл бұрын
Is didn't get the saving part
@economicswithsajid4 жыл бұрын
Nice
@juaneliasgonzalezperez116012 жыл бұрын
Muy Bien. Pero mejor en Español...podrian enviarlo en español?....
@George-om1te3 жыл бұрын
Cool
@tahirshaikh5208 Жыл бұрын
😅😅😊😅😊😊
@vogelszijnlelijk10 жыл бұрын
This is NOT a right explanation of the IS/LM model. First of all the x axis does not represent real GDP but nominal GDP or aggregate demand. Second the assumption of a higher propensity to save at higher income is not necessary to derive a downward sloping IS curve. This would be the case with a constant saved proportion as well. But more importantly what you explained as two seperate ways to derive the IS curve are in fact not seperate at all. They are interlinked and one is not sufficient without the other.
@anonymousgamerfifa126 жыл бұрын
vogelszijnlelijk isn't it supposed to be Y (Income, Output), which equals real GDP, as opposed to PY which is treated as nominal GDP? I think he has sourced his material from Dornbusch, Fischer and Startz.
@vid8507 ай бұрын
did not help
@TristanMorrow12 жыл бұрын
First Hazlitt then "Keynesian mercantilism"? Come back when you've read an economics textbook that was published this century. In the meantime, you've had 3+ opportunities to watch this video, which is about modeling liquidity preference: the LM curve here is a generally tested--albeit simplified--model designed to illustrate complex processes. You say that you don't like economics models, but models are just that: models. ...like the schemata and bias that you hold, except with math.
@ProDegiaque12 жыл бұрын
Not 2nd
@TristanMorrow12 жыл бұрын
...read a 1959 book that's just a critique of a 1936 book? Really, that's what it is.
@latjjtal2 ай бұрын
you say "real" too many times in this video and dont describe what it means. Maybe that was in another video. But if you say "bla bla money, I mean REAL money bla bla" it has no meaning.
@sindri55192 ай бұрын
Real - Taking account inflation
@ralkazmi12 жыл бұрын
just so no1 can claim 1st
@TristanMorrow12 жыл бұрын
Expertly trolled, my friend. Well done. On the off chance that you are even 1% serious, look: 1950's "solutions" to 1930's economics "problems" are ridiculous--the world has changed, and--thankfully--has our understanding of economics; Hazlitt rejects testability because he didn't like being proved wrong and he pretty much rejected all mathematical modeling, which was just plain stupid, because, as Khan demonstrates, it's pretty darn accurate. Please try to learn something next time.