| London 2002 - Hewitt vs Schalken (QF) |

[@SamsMovies]

been looking for this match for a very long time thank you.

[@al1976-v7m]

I think had Hewitt lost here it would have been Henman in the final...

[@SamsMovies]

@@al1976-v7m henman would have won the title. I think the crowd knew that too. So many times henman needed the cards to fall his way at wimby with other results and the rain delays in 2001 but it just didn't happen.

[@pcgamerzzzchannel3407]

​@@SamsMovies schalken was in form , won s-Hertogenbosch a week before wimbledon were he beated fed , i think he could've beat henman and nalbandian with the way he was playing, to bad he couldnt hold his nerves in the final set. I was a fan of Schalken he played with a weak body and could still compete at the highest level untill he got pfeiffer at a age of 27 + injuries ruined his performance.

[@SamsMovies]

@@pcgamerzzzchannel3407 interesting take, it would have been super surpising if shalken and kraijek made the last 8 yet shalken came out with the title. I think hewitt was the man to beat during that tournament and probably the correct winner overall though. Shalken was very close to stealing his "easy" wimbledon title off him though.

[@al1976-v7m]

What Sjeng is saying at the end could also be applied to himself- they have very similar game styles actually although their technique might look quite different.

[@al1976-v7m]

Thanks for the Upload, great match!