Theses are not fails, it is the purpose of practice and training. Finding and resolving weak points is the purpose testing your plan. Good job
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Exactly. That's how I see it too. Have a good one, Dick. Thanks for the support.
@cidcolead11156 ай бұрын
Seasoned hams set up a schedule with a frequency, but often move up (or down) to the next clear frequency when 1st choice is busy. We often switch to opposite sideband for side comments during a larger group conversation. Find a clear spot and do the opposite sideband to call it out real quick, or brake in if needed and suggest to your contact "move up 10 kc" You are doing an excellent job.
@k5wxp226 ай бұрын
I really appreciate that you actually show the failures. More importantly, the follow-up group conversation was great! Had you not done that, I seriously doubt you would have figured out you all were on a different time schedule. Throw in high adrenalin in an emergency situation, and you can probably multiply chances for error tenfold. Great job, Gaston! 73, Brett K5WXP
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
That "aha moment" was pretty clearly captured during our live debrief. You could see everyone's facial expression when it happened. Debriefs are great for catching this.
@ThomasK4SWL6 ай бұрын
Gaston, I love how thorough you are with these after action reports. Obviously, this process becomes more and more fluid and second nature the more times you repeat them. Good on you all for being deliberate about the contacts and scope of operation. In the past, I've done afternoon and evening scheds with two friends that are between propagation footprints depending on the time of day and conditions. At times, we'd have to sort out if 80, 60, or 40 meters was the best option for all three of us (one guy in northern OH, one in SE OH, and me in WNC). We used the same meet frequencies each time always with the understanding that if someone was on frequency, we would check a frequency range (typically +/- 5 kHz SSB, +/- 2 kHz CW). This worked out really well, in fact. That variation is so minor, it's easy to tune up and down to find the adjusted meeting spot. Of course, making the CQ a bit longer makes it easier for others to discover you as they tune. Anyway, great video and great job! Cheers, Thomas
@bbc5815 ай бұрын
Fantastic content folks! I cherish the lessons I am learning. Don't any of you feel these shortcomings resulted in failure by any means. This an epic demonstration of real life challenges. I look forward to the ability to use these take-aways to my advantage.
@TheTechPrepper5 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that you're finding value in the content. I try to share my entire journey along with successes, failures and how to move forward to become a better operator. Comments like this make the long days of juggling a full time job, family and KZbin worth it. 73
@tangobayus6 ай бұрын
One of my long range contacts using 100 watts on an NVIS antenna was with a QRP POTA station near Salt Lake City. He could hear me on his radio and I could hear him on the Half Moon Bay SDR. No idea what antenna he was using. 700 miles from San Francisco. A more recent POTA contact was with a guy using a 53 foot wire and 9:1 unun. I looked at the Xiegu when I was shopping for my first HF rig, but the Yaesu 991a is a better choice for me. HF, VHF, UHF in one box.
@billryland61996 ай бұрын
I use a Nano-F VNA for making and adjusting antennas. It shows the SWR curve for the desired band. If the planned frequency is busy just move up or down to a clear frequency and call again.
@neubert5006 ай бұрын
This is an excellent lesson for those who think just having a radio makes you ready! Also testing alone does not improve your capacities unless you do AAR analysis to fix identified issues. Thank you!
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Thanks for this comment. This is exactly the take away for this video. Cheers!
@Swamp-Fox6 ай бұрын
Lots of good lessons learned and food for thought in this one.....good stuff!
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Yes indeed! I thought the plan was pretty good as we have used it for other exercises. It looks like a couple of tweaks are needed. Have a good weekend.
@airsofteo91056 ай бұрын
Awesome AAR and sharing the information so we all can learn from. Looking forward to more of it.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it. More on the way. New comms templates coming soon to BMAC. Enjoy the weekend.
@kc8owl6 ай бұрын
The G90 has a good following with the POTA / SOTA operators and since those are usually voice, I think the g90 solves that use case reasonably well. For digital, unless you modify that connector, you just can't rely on it. That said, the G90 does make a great dedicated JS8 transceiver in the shack where it can stay stationary in a less demanding environment. Great exercise and AAR as always! 73 Mike KC8OWL
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
The G90 has a good following. I don't mean to knock it, but the radio selection really needs to be dependent on your particular needs and environment. As I mentioned, I really found the performance on digital and voice to be great, but the fragile construction and quality issues are problematic for my personal use.
@WR3ND6 ай бұрын
Looking forward to watching this later. Cheers.
@johnk237056 ай бұрын
Very good after action report. One other thing you might consider on the band plan for voice is to go up 5 or 10 if no contact can be made due to the frequency being in use. Something like at the 5 minute mark after the window starts. This would be especially good if phone was the only mode of contact. 73
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
We've been using that very technique for our local nets. Thanks for sharing.
@turdferguson28636 ай бұрын
After Action Reports, most excellent. ☕
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Yes, they are. Cheers.
@N0LSD6 ай бұрын
3:58 - On the Xeigu G90 - You're correct: inferior build quality compared to the Icom/Kenwood/Yaesu brands - which is why they're half the price of those other rigs. I actually had to have my original G90 replaced by Radioddity because it would randomly shut down for no reason. It is completely counter-intuitive when it comes to ALC, for instance: it wants an ALC reading between 75 and 85 to produce a clean signal; while most radios want an ALC value that's *lower* in order to produce a clean signal. I've never really been able to get a DigiRig to work with the G90 consistently. What I *have* been able to get to work with the G90 is the ZLP MiniPro SC soundcard interface. I reserve the DigiRig for my 817ND and, more often, the Tr(u)SDX.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
I found the ALC non intuitive on the G90 as well. However, the G90 worked incredibly well for digital until the CAT control failed. There were already too many issues out of the box that bothered me, so a hardware failure on the head unit after 8 weeks of use is enough for me to say, it's not for me. It's probably fine for those who want to tinker. I'm in this game for tools, not toys.
@BobBob-il2ku6 ай бұрын
Love that you included the garmin inreach I feel like it would work in 90-99% of scenarios & most hams are allergic to satcomms
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Fully agreed. I have it with me all the time along with my Yaesu VX-6R, but HF radios only come for very specific trips. Like you said, it will work 90+% of the time.
@Floyd-KQ4EUV6 ай бұрын
Great video, Gaston. Love the no random series.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Hey, buddy. It's good to see you. We need to connect soon. Shoot me an email.
@pale_21116 ай бұрын
IC-706 radios aren't too bad on the used market. Anywhere from $400-$600 on average. 100w radio on HF and 10w on VHF. Later models have changed, but are on the higher end of the price range or more. I've ordered some side rails from Armaloq or whoever it's spelled. Next step is to find an external sound card for working data modes, tuner and last is probably more than likely another laptop. Anyways, all of us have experienced failures and problems at one time or another. I've had them this past weekend on Ships Weekend. I was running FT8 for the USS Tennessee Museum under the club callsign W4BSF. At the museum, I've had quite a bit of trouble with my station. Didn't get many contacts in the log because of it. On a final note, take some notes from hard lessons learned and try again. We all can get it 100% right the first time.
@DonzLockz6 ай бұрын
Great stuff Gaston!. "What we have here is a failure to communicate!"😂👍
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
I know what movie I'm watching this weekend. Greatest line ever. Cheers!
@N4EJM6 ай бұрын
Great info. Thanks for that video.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Any time!
@shanemccray40506 ай бұрын
As always very informative, and helpful.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful! I'll share the new template for the next revision of the plan with you and the members as soon as I can.
@EmJayArr6 ай бұрын
I think you hinted at this, but although USB vs LSB is merely a convention, the digital vs voice segments are codified in §97.305(c). However, an actual emergency still allows a station "any means at its disposal" under §97.405, so that doesn't entirely preclude an "if all else fails" voice channel being in the digital segment in an emergency plan to be used in an actual emergency. The point I'm trying to make (terribly) is that although perhaps the merits of such a plan can be debated, there's no ear covering necessary 😆 Anyway, nice job all with the exercise and the debrief, everyone
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
I appreciate the clarification. That's what I meant when I stated that my personal emergency communications plan in a real emergency would attempt digital if needed. However, we will be experimenting with breaking USB/LSB convention as part of future training.
@wheeler79736 ай бұрын
Great information. It sounds like you guys had a few bugs to work out but that's how we learn. I've been setting my watches off WWV for a long time but I never realized that it also gave the SFI. I will be definitely be putting it in my notes for future use.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
WWV is a gold mine. I am working on the WWV field sheet for you and the members. I am still tweaking the design. Glad to see someone else using the time code in practice.
@brickerhaus6 ай бұрын
That is a good idea for the field cards. I can't wait to see what you have.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Thanks. I just need to make them into a digital version. The design is all hand-written. Coming soon.
@ke8mattj6 ай бұрын
Excellent job on the AAR!
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Thanks! Wait until I share with you and the community the next rev of the long range and mid range HF comms plan. 73
@Disastercommunications6 ай бұрын
Great job!!! Love the AAR.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it. The plan will be updated soon. Have a good weekend.
@gm7436336 ай бұрын
some digital modes do not work when going thru two audio circuits (A/D). I'm not sure if it's a double sampling problem or speaker to mic distortion (phase) issue.
@KC3WHJ6 ай бұрын
Because I have taken precautions regarding all the connection points on my G90, I'm still willing to trust it though I have multiple backups. (P.A.C.E. covers more than methods.) I'd still like to see an EmComm Tools setup for it, if you're willing to release it. Great after action report btw.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Don't worry. The work has been done already. It's been in the commercial build for two months and will be in the next community release.
@michaelaudet34196 ай бұрын
I bought a g90 because of price constraints, still have not successfully used it to make a contact. I unfortunately only have a technicians license so the next step is to get my next license. I keep trying to snag an 857d or a 706mkiig but im also leary about buying used equipment.
@haxwithaxe6 ай бұрын
The space weather on HF is a great tip!
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
That was a new find. It's funny considering that I have been using the WWV broadcast for the last 6 months for syncing my time manually, but only now discovered the SWPC alerts. I must have never listened on the 18 or 45 minute mark.
@theamericansilverback6 ай бұрын
Good information.... I purchased the G90 prior to finding you a few years back .. hopefully it'll survive as it'll be a fixed station and not hauled around in the field. Fingers crossed
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
I think you'll be fine. I heard that the early runs had better manufacturing quality, so you might be fine. Also, I am tough on my gear, so shack use is likely a safe bet for the G90.
@vironpayne34056 ай бұрын
Long distance communications - dial 01 followed by country code and full phone number. Simple. Safe. Effective. Reliable. Easy to use. Of course, you can do what you want. YOU FT-8XX ADDICT!!
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
We're starting a support group in the Phoenix area to help addicts like myself.
@PowderMill4 ай бұрын
Hi TP.. I wanted to thank you for a great collection of videos and have 2 quick items for ‘ya. 1. I was wondering where you’re physically located. I’m guessing you are a “DMR” Guy, but I have 2 Motorola Quantar repeaters I have left over from before was forced to retire. (Ankylosing Spondylitis ugh.) They are “gold chassis” UHF R3 100w P25/Analog mixed-mode with every option /\/\ offered, (including advanced wireline option). They are 2015 vintage, but still unused. You are welcome to them if you are near the Northwest NJ area. My way of saying “thanks”. I have taken most of my Hytera & Motorola DMR gear and am setting up an EMComm “system” for family and your videos have been helpful.
@PowderMill4 ай бұрын
#2 - In one of your videos (I forgot which one and can’t locate it for some reason 🙄 definitely a “me” problem LOL), I noticed an oversight. I used to LOVE Hytera equipment, mainly because of the outstanding “FPP” functionality. I still am a fan, but wish they had much more support and a stable future in the US. When I first started in the public safety world, it was in the 1980’s w/channel elements and crystals. Post 9/11, “interoperability” became the buzzword and much of the /\/\otorola gear we were using (JT1000 and the XTS Astros - 2500 and 5000 etc) permitted pretty functional “FPP”. With P25 (phase 2), it’s just not possible to do much without CPS. For personal use and family business use, I jumped into DMR. The XPR-7550e looked great, but impossible to do much w/o CPS. The “FPP” option board out there is miserable and pricey. So, I used Hytera. Virtually everything can be modified in the field and it was just as rugged as /\/\. The came the lawsuits and “new” firmware removing features etc., but I’m still happy with the radios we have. Sorry for the novel length post, but here goes: The Hyteras, IF they have a display and keypad, (AND each function is enabled w/CPS) - They CAN do control signaling: not only “stun/kill” stuff, disable/enable “radio check” and query GPS coordinates from individual units. BUT.. they also have “remote monitoring” (common ?) and “RENT”. If “renting” to a customer (or other similar uses), you can program (CPS only), you can have individual radios “time out” at the end of a period of time, a specific date/time, amount of “on” time, etc. While I never had a use for this, it might be useful in cache type radios.? The radios can be re-enabled via CPS or code entry. Sorry for the
@PowderMill4 ай бұрын
“EMERGENCY ERASE” & “Over the Air Auth” FUNCTIONS !! I COMPLETELY FORGOT. One of the more recent features added to the Hytera FW includes one of the coolest functions I’ve seen for the “prepper” or personal/family comms. A friend told me about it a few months ago and I thought he was kidding. I checked the CPS and it is there. He said it was initially released with their “restricted / military” radios, but is now included in most of the PD, MD and HP series radios. (approx 90% of their models) You can enable this function to ERASE the encryption keys alone or the keys plus the entire code plug. It can be activated in one of two ways (either / or… selected in CPS when programming). Method 1: It can be activated locally by the radio user by pressing a series of buttons (SK1 and PTT) in a special sequence. Method 2: It can be activated remotely by an authorized control radio by using the remote “disable/kill” function. OTA AUTHENTICATION: Each radio can be programmed to require a hex key for OTAP (over the air programming- of freq/cc/slot/etc) and/or for control features (“stun/kill” / “radio check” / “remote monitor” / etc) Prior to the auth function, it was a fairly common occurrence for local police/fire/etc radios to be remotely “killed” or have mysterious “open mic” (really remote monitor being enabled by another radio). Just random folk with DMR radios could wreak havoc. Many functions can be restricted to only work when the proper key is received by the remote radio controller station or radio. I’m not sure if the xpr7550e can do the same, but I know the AnyTone can’t.
@nvrumi6 ай бұрын
I love AARs! I do them all the time with my POTA/SOTA outings. While I watched Isaac's video, it occurred to me that your comms plan might have included an option for the frequency being in use of Up 5 or Down 5. I'd put the alternate frequency on VFO B and if QRL then hit the A/B button. A second option would be to hit split and tune the receiver Up or Down as required. The WWV output is absolutely critical to field operations. Not only will be able to set your computer's clock, but you'll get instant feedback on propagation from which frequency you can hear. Furthermore, the solar information is perfect. Well done, sir! 73 de AG7TX
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
That's an excellent habit. Keep it up. Personally, I have been doing these since the beginning to help refine my gear and approach in the field. In fact, this how the manpacks came into existence. I hit the wall in the backcountry while trying to execute on field expedient comms when I was running a 3L dry bag with components scattered in my bag.
@ricksargent87546 ай бұрын
I agreed with your comments regarding garmin. Don’t listen to the haters.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Every device has its place with its strengths and weaknesses. It's hard to ignore the ease of use, reliability, ruggedness, and ability to use the Garmin globally. It's essential backcountry gear. Have a good one.
@WRJK9886 ай бұрын
Sounds like lack of SOP. Not lack of skills at all. These guys are great at what they do.
@MikeHammonds8046 ай бұрын
Will you still include the G90 in future releases of EnComm Tools?
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Yes. The work has been done. It's in the next release.
@MikeHammonds8046 ай бұрын
@@TheTechPrepper thank you
@Deano_K5MPG6 ай бұрын
Geo alerts? Awesome!
@FooBar896 ай бұрын
what was the problem with Digirig?
@Q12_6 ай бұрын
Does your FZ-M1 Lag after a bit of using JS8 Call? Not sure what's going on with mine but it is really infuriating
@JebBrilliant6 ай бұрын
Thanks for all the really good info over the years. I’ve recently gotten into ham and got my technician license because of your videos. I’m going to start studying for general later this summer. Where can I go to make a small 1 time donation? I’m between jobs so I don’t want to commit to anything.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
You're very welcome. I really do enjoy sharing the process as I make my way through disaster comms. Good luck with your General ticket. It really opens up short, mid and long range communication. No need for the donation, but I do appreciate it. The comment and your views are enough. When you get back on your feet, consider checking out my Buy Me a Coffee page in the video description. You can do a one-time donation there and just buy a single cup. The memberships are month over month. Thanks and good luck with your journey.
@thebnbaldwin6 ай бұрын
When the SHTF, all convention goes out the window.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Bingo. MARS mod your radios now, folks! ;-)
@k9bob6 ай бұрын
You may want to something other than JB Weld to secure that data jack. It may not be an appropriate choice.
@limanowski12346 ай бұрын
I think your skills are more than average for the average hamster. I am really enjoying this series with Jason. Keep up the good work! John N9DNB PS I use the Stick antenna analyzer and its great for field work. The NanoVNA is too fragile for field activity.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Thank you. There is still a lot to learn and share. This is the second time that Jason and I have done this. Agreed about the use both analyzers. I use the NanoVNA only at home.
@CrazyChekov6 ай бұрын
maybe of interest. I have a video on my channel where I calculated the best bands for 5 different grids based on 1 year wspr data. you can download the files there. was about 6month of work. 😬
@jamesmoore64246 ай бұрын
I grew my beard out during the pandemic and I will say my mustache would absolutely be well coffee flavored by 10am. However, my good lady let me know during the week that she missed the smoothness. Shaved on Tuesday! 😂
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Did you wear any white dress shirts? I did when I had an office to go to. Big mistake. Nothing but stains. The beard is a lifestyle. Have a good one.
@Philip-KA4KOE6 ай бұрын
Low inverted vee may not have been the best choice for long haul.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
You have to work with what you have. I do primarily NVIS, so my antennas are low to the ground. 23' is as high as I go with my gear. In the end, QRP with digital did the trick.
@aa7778886 ай бұрын
TLDR version: lack of experience as HF radio operators leads to comm's failure 😉
@jamespurser3576 ай бұрын
JB weld is conductive.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Good thing it's still in the package. Thank you for the catch. How about your typical hot glue gun glue? Any other suggestions?
@Aramalas6 ай бұрын
@@TheTechPrepper Electronics potting compound perhaps? I'm sure there is a version that sets like hard epoxy out there.
@DonzLockz6 ай бұрын
A slow-set epoxy is the best. Non-conductive and stronger than the fast set/cure type. :)
@jamespurser3576 ай бұрын
That would probably work good
@TerminalElement6 ай бұрын
I liked my G90... up until the magic smoke that it runs on came out of it.
@bruehlt6 ай бұрын
No reason to believe you are a gear snob. There's a reason why Baofeng's suck. Buy once cry once. People in the firearm community brag about their expensive rifles and gear then skimp out on radio gear. Good radio gear isn't cheap! You have to pony up if you want to have gear that will last and you can depend on.
@bruehlt6 ай бұрын
TREX should experiment with NVIS with Jason. That is where the money is for local comms vs 2m/70cm.
@tangobayus6 ай бұрын
Both Icom and Yaesu HT's have sensitive receivers. Much much better than Baofeng.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
100% agreed. We're on 40m every day for both voice and digital out here in the southwest.
@tangobayus6 ай бұрын
@@TheTechPrepper 40 is the most active band. Usually clean compared to 20 and 80.
@toast8036 ай бұрын
I disagree with you regarding the G90. I've had exactly the same failure on both Yaesu and Icom radios. I continue mistreating my G90 with my Digirig and it keeps pounding forward.
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Respectfully, there is a considerable difference in the build quality between these radios. It's great that you have had a positive experience with the G90, but I don't think anyone can honestly say the G90 is quality. It performs better than it should for a radio in that price range with a nice set of features, but quality and dependability should never be in the same sentence as G90. Personally, that radio is for tinkering. The FT-817 has been around for over 20 years. Let's see if there is still a following for the G90 15+ years from now.
@toast8036 ай бұрын
@@TheTechPrepper Didn't make that statement, just that your failure of the G90 happens on Yaesu/Icom radios as well. Yes, there is a different level of quality, but it is a Swiss army tool that will meet the challenges and needs of 80-90% of the users and is still in production. Even you have chosen not to use certain Japanese radios because they couldn't handle the abuse you throw at them. Why judge this radio so harshly? It is what it is... I can choose to put 2 radios into service or one. Shoot, if I were only focused on digital I'd consider the Xiegu G106. I can put 3-4 of those into service for the cost of getting old Japanese radios working. My goal is to get people moving and using these tools, not panic because they don' have the ideal tool because that does NOT exist. Must be nice to be picky.
@JohnTarbox6 ай бұрын
Great de-brief! DE WA1KKLI
@TheTechPrepper6 ай бұрын
Thanks. It was a great exercise that could have gone better, but that would have benefited no one. As always, I am happy to share the successes and failures. 73.