Love it or Hate it? - You Can't Unsee This!

[@RudyAyoub]

thanks for ruining my life.

[@Gabrini_acoustics]

actually for me, I have always liked the Epiphone head more... guess it's just the taste :)

[@xilonqmb]

Me too

[@six65nine]

I'm in the Epiphone head stock group too, always like the cut outs myself.

[@andrewbryan359]

Me too!

[@tdtom1376]

I agree. I like the Epi headstock. And the less material at the "wings" means that maybe it won't get caught on something and break off that fragile Gibson headstock.

[@tbuday]

Same here. All the classical guitars I've ever had had the same head stock. I like it's feminine shape. :)

[@Ojas.mediratta]

They literally CUT CORNERS hahahahah!

[@Rand_al_Thor372]

Ive been saying the exact same thing for years now!!! Its so obvious what the message is!!!

[@cplfamily]

Yes, I was just thinking same thing... a Gibson that they “cut corners” !!! 😎

[@brandonhill6168]

I’m so accustomed to my epi that I actually prefer the headstock to the Gibson

[@notallbadyo]

Same here. I've always thought it looked great, but maybe that's just because I don't play a Les Paul, so I didn't compare it to the Gibson Les Paul's headstock at all.

[@barbmelle3136]

From Leo: I have bought and sold enough guitars since the early 70's to eclipse the stock at most independent guitar shops. I have never felt any hate for the Epiphone headstocks. Simple and functional. The sharper the points on any headstock design, the more likely to see the paint or binding chipped off. Not many Kramers out there that don't have damaged headstocks.

[@sloebone7399]

I’ve decided I’d rather have an Epiphone and $1000 in the bank than a Gibson. I can live with the clipped ears

[@erdoserdos]

Sloe Bone Amen.

[@andrewbryan359]

Me too!

[@jeremiahwilson1781]

More than a grand in savings these days depending on model for model. Gibson is hit or miss in quality now and WAY overpriced.

[@cosmocalypse3708]

More difference than just a headstock.

[@darrinros1177]

1000? Try 1400 more. But, I am a Gibson guy. I can't lie. The Epiphones play and sound better than my expensive Gibson. The headstock should look the same as Gibson. Then Gibson would probably go away based on the money and the quality.

[@caymanshen459]

I prefer the Epiphone headstock tbh. And I don't own one, I own a Gibson, so no brand snobbery from me. I just feel the Epiphone is more aesthetically pleasing.

[@whitefantom]

I agree. I think the Gibson design is a bit too boxy, while the Epiphone design seems more elegant. (Full disclosure: I do own an Epiphone, but I have no particular loyalty to the brand, it just happens to be the entry-level guitar I could afford at the time.)

[@aaronperrotta7055]

The Epiphone headstock is hideous compared to Gibson. I mean just look at them

[@epipick]

Cayman Shen I own several Epis and think the headstock is one of their best features.

[@guitardev9399]

I'm not bothered by the Epiphone headstock. More concerned about a 3x3 headstock staying in tune. My Epiphone does, so it's all good. Long live Epiphone! Cheers!

[@unique23b32]

If I had a guitar pick for every time I've seen the Gibson "ears" chipped, I'd have a lot of guitar picks. Might be partly the reason for the difference. "Esthetics" are subjective. My vote is for the Epi headstock.

[@Karoug]

Same here, i prefer the Epi headstock.

[@rtxf]

Unique 23b my tech fixed it like 3 times but everytime I got my gibson lp back I got them chipped in a week or so...

[@SaxJockey]

I have an Epi LP, the shape of the headstock does not even cross my mind. I see the attraction of the classic Gibson headstock, BUT I do not see the attraction of the higher rake angle (potential tuning and breakage issues) and the ears that can be knocked about 😱. If you want to talk about weird looking headstocks on an LP shaped guitar, take a look at the PRS SE Standard 245...oh brother! Maybe it keeps tune better?

[@patrickrosington1174]

I have never in my life seen a Gibson headstock with the corners nipped off.

[@xxXthekevXxx]

The Epiphone headstock looks better IMO... the Gibson headstock almost looks "unfinished". Like there were some sharp edges they forgot to sand down. It's all subjective and up to opinion though :)

[@schmidth]

Yeah, The Gibson one is horrible in comparison imo. Epiphone looks more symmetrical. And feminine in a way.

[@ryans9029]

Either of you own a genuine gibson?

[@KuyaPow626]

Same thought!

[@chaosandorderstudio]

Give me a break. The epi headstock... What a joke of a headstock

[@EdFedermeyer]

I’d have to disagree. I think both the Epiphone and Gibson headstocks are fine. Between the two, I’d imagine the Epiphone headstock is actually better due to the less severe break angle!

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

Agree, the break angle is much better on the Epi 👍

[@ryans9029]

Less to do with break angle, and much to do with a scarf joint correcting the grain direction issue.

[@Sig721Tau]

@@DarrellBraunGuitar I need your help, dude! In the movie Rudderless, Anton Yelchin plays a white Epiphone electric guitar with an unusual headstock. What model is his guitar?

[@aniquinstark4347]

@@ryans9029 That's irrelevant to the tuning problems of gibson's vs epiphones. The extreme headstock angle on gibsons causes tuning issues because of binding at the nut.

[@JC-11111]

Not to mention they're 2 entirely different shapes. Literally nothing lines up if you lay an outline of one over the other. Nothing. Not the bumps up top. Not the sides. None of it.

[@domoniquebrooks816]

I don’t get the nitpicking over the something so small. I actually prefer the Epiphone design. I never thought of it as a Gibson minus design but a design of it’s own.

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

It's not nitpicking per say, I'm just curious why Epiphone would design it like that when it is a departure from their previous guitars ☺

[@757optim]

Marketing. Gibson (and other manufacturers) have sued over such things. It would be ironic (hypocritical?) for Gibson to allow a headstock design that they had sued over to be duplicated on Epis. Conversely, the Maestro is no threat to Gibson sales. Just an addition to the "bottom line", if you will.

[@alep7358]

+757optim pretty sure it more has to do with frauding an Epi to say Gibson by making the headstock different people can't slap a Gibson name on it and pass it off

[@ryans9029]

But it's literally not ours own design. Epiphone les Pauls in the 80s had the standard gibson headstock. They clipped the corners in like 1989. It's literally a gibson headstock with the corners clipped off

[@briumphbimbles]

@@ryans9029 They didnt. They have never had the same headstocks. Plenty of old epiphones have corners but none of the headstocks were the same shape

[@Spidouz]

Honestly? I don't know why people get so obsess about the headstock... I see your point, but I really don't care at all, with or without the horns, I could really care less about it. As long as it stays in tunes, is comfortable to play and has a great sound, I'm all good. Fun fact: Maybe, only 5 years ago, I was still a very gear snob. I always thought Epiphones were guitars for people that couldn't afford Gibson, and Squier were for kids that couldn't get a Fender... you know all this kind of gear elitist non-sense. And then, I had the chance to work in studio that was full of very good gear, high-end, rare and vintage stuff, Custom Shop, Private Stock, you name it. And if it's true that some gear were just awesome to play, I discovered that we can find great gear at any price point and that the name on the headstock doesn't mean much. I have a $300 MIJ '94 Strat that has nothing to be shamed in comparison to the $10k Masterbuilt John Cruz '96 Strat I had in the studio. They are different, yes... but not good and bad, just different. I slowly started to like gear for what it is and not for what I think it is because of the marketing, the branding, the perception, etc... And that's why my last guitar I bought 2 weeks ago was an Epiphone 1966 Century James Bay Ltd Ed.... and guess what? It's awesome. And yes, I still have PRS guitar that are worth more than $3k and Two-Rock Amp that also is ver $3k... but it doesn't mean I wouldn't play with a used $300 Amp such a Fender Blues Junior (or something else). Let's just say it's an awesome time to play music with all choices of gear we have out there at any price point, for any style and any person preferences. So, if one doesn't like the Epiphone headstock, it's not a big deal, there's many other brand with great products out there, that hopefully, will satisfy him/her. We can easily get caught into the whole "gear nerding" thing (I play guilty on that), but in the end of the day, it's just tools folks... just tools :) My 2¢

[@Spidouz]

So to answer your question: Love it or hate it? Neither... I don't care :)

[@utubehound69]

The Gibson headstock looks odd to me now that I've "looked pass the headstock" I've gotten use to the epi headstock. I agree 100% with you comment above that is very true. Some of my favorite most inspiring instruments weren't my most expensive. Funny thing the Les Paul was developed at the Epi factory they made pickups for the Gibson electrics. My 1st guitar was a MIJ Strat w/a Tele headstock brand new black hard tail too. But everything else was like a strat. Looking back that was a good guitar I thought it was not up to the "standard" what ever that was then. I wish I had that guitar back.

[@baumfr]

What? Are you saying those two little clipped corners don't affect the tone? Blasphemy, I say!

[@Spidouz]

No no, don't get me wrong... without those two little clipped corners, the headstock is "sooooo much" lighter, and therefore the sound is "sooooo much" airy, breathy, and ... oh well, who am I kidding? :)

[@vsgamingandatheism5017]

It's about money look at me I got Gibson but more recently Gibson's are trash people playing Epiphone shouldn't be embarrassed seriously you go to a GC or Sam Ash and you see a Gibson new with a crack in it's neck do you buy it or get the epi that's cheap but it plays just as good.

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

Love my Epiphones, not the biggest fan of the headstock. Cast your vote! Love it or hate it?

[@jaysegarcia285]

Darrell Braun Guitar I like Epiphones, but not really a fan of the headstocks, they're ugly lol. Also, I think it depends more on the model, such as the Epiphone Sheraron II, the headstock looks great on that.

[@mutantbaby1672]

I have an Epi ES 175 Premium hanging on the wall here. The ears on this one are not cut off. Frankly, both designs look ok to me.

[@DesertScorpionKSA]

The headstock is too long and should be shorter. I agree that it would look better with the "wings" back on.

[@lrdstrahd1]

Head stocks aren't a big thing for me. My only issue with them is the actual design. Too harsh a rear angle and little reinforcement at the back make them victims of even the smallest of bumps or accidents also some tuning issues. I own both an Epiphone and a Gibson and I like both for different reasons... but both have head stock issues for me.

[@bofuscrapshaw]

Love your channel but I must disagree. EVERY epi i ever had suffered from bad electronics, input jack issues and an overall lack of QC. I also find the pickups sounds like crap

[@tylerjones8145]

Guitars are like people. They may not look fantastic on the outside but on the inside they're truly magnificent

[@graftongodofmemes]

I don't look at that headstock as a chopped up Gibson at all. I think it's all I your head, I like them equally I reckon.

[@DBCisco]

It is like deciding between cars based on the headlight bezels. ;)

[@landonbailey]

It's definitely an interesting thing with Epiphone and their headstocks. Fender has no problem using the same shape on Squier models. anyways cool topic! ttyl!

[@mechamercdraws765]

There are subtle differences in both the headstock and the body of Squier to Fender models. While this is less deliberate it is likely Fender wouldn't be too happy if suddenly they were spot on across the board.

[@nealdew71]

MechaMercDraws Very true friend.

[@MaddoxMelton]

Beacuse u can slap a veener sticker that says gibson on it and people will think u got a Gibson

[@ryans9029]

@@MaddoxMelton just like fender.....

[@orafaelorsato]

I respect your opinion, but it seems perfectly fine to me.

[@MisterGuitarItalia]

I love the Epiphone headstock with binding... not so much plain. I also find it much more appealing on Epiphone's proprietary designs.

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

Agree!

[@ryanrobinson2300]

Hadn't noticed that until now, at least the angle of the headstock is 14 degrees instead of 17 with epiphone *I learned that from a certain Canadian guitar KZbin channel*

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

😀😀😀👍

[@substrate001]

LOVE the Epi headstock! IMHO, the "lips" at the very top are more pronounced, and extend slightly further up, i.e.: the headstock itself is a little longer, creating more of a curved section from the top down to the "shoulders". Just my humble opinion, but I agree totally with another post commenting on how the Epi reminds of 'art deco' and beautiful appointments in early skyscrapers. Also reminds me of the beautiful lines of curved panel and chrome trim on some '30's through '60's automobiles. I like 'em both, though; just can't *$$ afford $$* the Gison Les Paul!

[@D-A-1776]

I love the new epiphone headstocks, and it stays in tune better

[@zifis]

I prefer my epiphone's headstock, reminds me of a jewel. Plus, extra curves make her easier to fall in love with ;)

[@nn567]

Inhave been saying this for years. My impression...Gibson wanted to make sure that everyone knew the Epiphone was perceived as lesser than Gibson...hence the "mutilated" head stock. Good video

[@nn567]

The functional design for you may be better...sure..but asthetically pleasing...not so much. Of course that is subjective.

[@nn567]

Philtration ..being 15 has nothing to do with it. I'm 56 and I think they are not aesthetically pleasing. I don't care how functional it is...I get to choose. Choice is wonderful. Doesn't mean my choice is better than yours...we all have our reasons. :)

[@andrewbryan359]

Can't see a scarf joint on my Epi's.

[@brunojacq5473]

I think this too, that the Epi headstock is soo ugly, to make sure, that the people who can afford a much beautifull Gibson will do it !

[@grygrskls]

It's because Gibson "cuts corners" with the Epiphone brand

[@jimmyparris9892]

HAHA. I love it. Best KZbin comment today. I still prefer Epiphone guitars over most Gibsons. I like to tinker and I don't want to mess with a $3k guitar. I can change all kinds of stuff on an Epi (not that it needs it) and not feel guilty. The cheapest Epiphone on the market plays better than I do, so...

[@stankfanger1366]

*+grygrskls* Dude, this comment is so full of win... :)

[@grygrskls]

Jimmy Parris I hear ya, with all the options now people love to swap things out. And with cnc and new technologies lower price guitars are catching up quick anyways

[@benhaven7501]

ZINGGGGGGGGG GOT EM! hahaha

[@lowqualityguitarvideos]

Gibson cuts quite a bit of corners with their sub $1000 US made instruments too! Hows that faded satin finish treatin ya? :P

[@davidwernsing8795]

I agree, I like the Japanese Epiphone headstocks that look like a Gibson or the older Epiphone headstock with the big curves on top. I've seen people convert Epi headstocks to Gibson's shape, it's a lot of work, but looks so much better. Keep up the great videos!

[@mattterrell4304]

I actually prefer the Epi head stock

[@priyonjoni]

At least the Epi headstock isn't angled like the Gibson which causes binding at the nut.

[@LegsON]

Pri yon Joni They also weaken the string pressure on the nut which contributes to the tone.

[@LegsON]

Pri yon Joni They also weaken the string pressure on the nut which contributes to the tone.

[@adambilge2834]

Lexonn PRS headstocks are angled 10 degrees and they have plenty of tone. Gibson 17 degree headstocks do not increase tone.

[@LegsON]

It's basic physics. That's why break angle matters a whole lot on an acoustic guitar, that's why Fender have special things on the headstock and that's why to these days classical and other guitars bother with slotted headstocks.

[@lolerzzz]

"special things" You mean string trees right? They're there to ensure the string doesn't come out of the nut.

[@zr5r514]

Cutting corners

[@jgmopar]

The only guitar headstock I personally like is the pointy Jackson headstock. I equally dislike the Gibson and Epiphone headstock and there tuning instabilities and prone to breaking. I know one thing Gibson is doing pretty bad over all these days

[@ayusharipirala3121]

Then there's strandberg

[@sgtmac62]

New Kalamazoo headstock. Woot!

[@deadpoinsettia]

I really like the Epiphone headstock, even more than the Gibson. It might be because I own 4 of them. Also....with the clipped ears it really looks like a thick, hard cover, open book and how the pages would sit on each other.

[@stricknine8623]

I like both headstocks...There was a time when I preferred the Epiphone headstock slightly. But they both are great. I happily own several of each.

[@clownpocket]

They should do an ad for Epiphone; Camera pans up a beautiful woman when they get to the head the tops of her ears are missing.

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

😄😄😄

[@eezamanna20]

Hahaha

[@stevenh2535]

Hahaha! Nice.

[@andrewbryan359]

But unless she's bald she can cover them with her hair!

[@ozemg32_ozem_goldwire]

I myself will say this to everyone. From what I've gathered, many people disliked Epiphone guitars over the headstock design and they often believed they are the bastardized models of the Gibson counterparts. What many people DON'T even know that this headstock design was the downsized version of the vintage 1930s Epiphone Emperor guitar headstock. Epiphone Emperor acoustic jazz guitar was first debuted in 1935 to compete with the Gibson Super 400 acoustic guitar. By 1992, or earlier, the Emperor headstock was adopted and redesigned to be compact for regular solid-bodied guitars. This includes the Les Paul Model. Please understand that Gibson and Epiphone were fierce rivals long before Gibson bought Epiphone in May of 1957. In truth, these Gibson-designed Epiphone guitars are their adaptations of the Gibson guitar classics. In case you want to know about the history of Epiphone guitars, please read this book, "Epiphone: The Complete History" by Walter Carter. In case you want to know about Les Paul guitars and how this strange Epiphone headstock design came to being, please read this book, "The Modern Era Of The Les Paul Legacy, 1968-2009" by Robb Lawrence on page 161. Now there's a piece of history for everybody! ;) Take care, everyone. ;)

[@cuddlemesoft]

I've always been a fan of the Epiphone headstock, I find it...reassuring...I actually like it more than the Gibson headstock...But I respect your opinion...

[@Edward1312]

Hallelujah!!! I've just immediately ordered 2 of the new inspired by Gibson range. I wouldn't have ever done this if Epiphone hadn't changed the headstock shape. Gibson have finally listened and done something about the Epiphone brands awful headstock which I hated. I also like the fact that the new headstock isn't just a straight copy of the Gibson open book headstock but re-introduces the early 60's American made Epiphone style headstocks, that Kalamazoo used, aka the early style headstock that Paul McCartney's Casino has. Epiphone are keeping some of their own identity and heritage by reintroducing a previous Epiphone style, meaning the guitars in the new Epiphone Gibson inspired range, are not just straight rip offs of Gibson's.

[@clamus68]

I actually REALLY like the Epiphone Les Paul headstock. The clipped ear as you call it to me is an homage to the Gibson without copying it. I actually like the clipped ear more than I do the full Epiphone Headstock you see on the hollow bodied guitars like the Riviera. That's just my opinion though. Great video.

[@spconn3867]

Darrell-I own several Epis & a Gibson. Never minded or gave much thought to the headstock difference. I like the look of the epiphones but your're right, I Can't Unsee This

[@tasberkes]

Epiphone headstock looks better to me,more original and the bottom part is wider,which looks cool

[@Vyrtus_]

The difference is the Epiphone headstock doesn’t snap off.

[@baumfr]

What I really hate is that, before the Internet and KZbin, I pronounced "Epiphone" like the word epiphany. I am still embarrassed.

[@jcmcclain57]

I think the headstock is one of the primary reasons I have never purchased a modern day Epiphone guitar. I have always owned Gibson and now that they are looking like they are about to truly become Chibson, I will treasure my ‘59 Les Pauls all the more.

[@juliankonowalski]

I've never thought of it! And like u said, I can't unsee it now😂

[@elduderino3995]

Darrell is the only person who cares enough to ask if i had a great day....

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

I got your back! ☺👍

[@kevinpotter2288]

I agree, Squire shares the same head stock as a fender. The ES-335 Epiphone doesn't have the notches cut out. I can't see why they would do itto the Les Pauls and SGs.

[@lesd2633]

Kevin Potter the 335 Eli is nothched

[@kevinpotter2288]

Not mine.

[@kevinpotter2288]

Actually I think my ES-335 has more of a tradition EPI "mustache" headstock.

[@Bigbuddyandblue]

You should invent an “Headstock Ear Restoration Aftermarket Kit”. A couple of glue-on pieces to complete an Epiphone headstock.

[@daniloheat]

I have never been bothered by the design of the Epiphone, but mainly I prefer the six in a row headstock fender style or even better the pointy Jackson Charvel of the 80's. I've seem to be trapped in the eighties, and my favorite guitar from Gibson is the explorer. My principal concern with a guitar is always the shape and while I admit the Les Paul sounds beautiful, I just can't play it and feel right with me, like we don't belong together.

[@danielcannon4727]

daniloheat second the LP thing. Cannot stand the neck joint.

[@mynameisspence]

My headstock contention is on a functional standpoint. The less friction points at the nut slots, the better tuning stability. I like the straight-pull design that are on heritage guitars. PRS utilizes this concept too. And fenders with the exception that 'string trees' that are needed in order to have some anchor point on the nut slot.. At any rate, It's not something a well filed nut can't remedy, but it's the appreciation in the design that is worth noting.

[@rjmcmooseknuckle]

you didnt ruin anything , i love me Epi!!! Haters hate

[@KRAZEEIZATION]

It’s a small headstock in fairness and it should be like a Gibson. Was it to stop counterfeit guitars?

[@jjorjj]

aesthetically i really enjoy the epiphone headstock more, i agree with the "incomplete" part, but i find it cooler like that

[@stricknine8623]

Having a preference is fine but I thought the "incomplete" comment Darrel made to be odd. Like it or not, the Epiphone took slightly more time to finish. I guess, if you don't like it, you should say that "they went too far" Those edges aren't merely clipped either,...they are clipped by comparison and then have curvature "dips" Epiphone headstock may not look good to some but it has more design in it (good or bad) than the Gibson.

[@stricknine8623]

I like both the Gibson and Epiphone headstocks, including the new Epiphone headstocks

[@aaronwebb1548]

@@stricknine8623 I was with you in the first half, but the new "fat lip" headstocks look silly to me (although I haven't handled one in person yet, maybe they just don't photograph well).

[@mbmrip11]

Totally agree. Love epiphones, despise the headstock. The Gibson headstock is just so classy and iconic it’s hard to go from that to the epiphone.

[@AgentAE25]

I actually didn't know until recently that Epiphones have a different headstock. I always imagined the Gibson headstock on them for some reason. And now I can't unsee this. PS Your dog is adorable. I want to pet him.

[@leftygeezer]

This Epiphone headstock design is like having Sammy Hagar permanently attached to the end of the neck. JK

[@Kadmosthegreat]

Good info, didn't know that. I always though Epi preferred that headstock, but I guess not really. Personally I like it better, it has an Art Deco look, reminds me of decorations on the Empire State building, old cars from the 30's and 40's. Anyway, if you heart this comment I will literally unsubscribe from your channel. J/k

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

😄😄😄👍

[@stephenwillard2]

Glad someone else feels the samw way thanks for brinning this up!

[@pedrodellallibera]

Honestly, I prefer the Epiphone headstock to Gibson's, precisely because they look more delicate, Kinda like how the Tele headstock is nicer than the Strat's because it's less aggressive in style...

[@andrewbryan359]

Took me a long time to like the Tele but now I love it. Like the Strat too! I'm just a nerd who likes guitars!

[@BillStreetStudios]

This is probably the craziest comment but I do like the Epiphone headstock better than the Gibson one, I don't know why I just love it

[@perihelion7798]

Not an ugly headstock, but bland and uninspired. Like my wife's cooking. However, when I attempt to play guitar, my attention is not focused on the headstock. If someone comments about an ugly headstock on a guitar that I am attempting to play, I stop playing [which may be a relief], and bash them over the head with the guitar. If it's a nylon string guitar, I gently weep, as those guitars are very lightly constructed, and will break upon impact with an adult human head. I do not bash children, however rude they are.

[@utubehound69]

Hahaha

[@perihelion7798]

Ben: I cook my own lunches every day, and my dinner about half of the time. My wife is actually a pretty good cook, but lacks my Irish flare for the culinary adventurous. She doesn't like spicy food either :)

[@andrewbryan359]

She doesn't like spicy food? Do you only manage to get curries when your out on your own. I like mine sitting at home with a nice bottle of red and a chance to lay straight out on the sofa afterwards! You need to educate your dear wife in the food of the East! My wife and I have been eating curries for 50 happy years together. Had one last night. LOL

[@perihelion7798]

Andrew: I love hot red curry sauce. The wife prefers the milder yellow curry. She is a devout tea-totaler, and eschews alcohol most of the time. Congratulations on 50 years of marriage! That's great.

[@andrewbryan359]

"50 years together". 48 happily married in September! But that's still pretty good. At least we don't argue over headstocks!!! I think Darrell was worried about insufficient activity on the site so he had to stir things up. I hope he admits he was out voted - unless he's a politician, of course!

[@jamesmckay435]

A lot of guys know that life is better when you get the "snip".

[@jakobsteele3901]

Cute dog Darrell! I think the clipped ears make it look kind of unique even if it doesn't look that good like a Gibson headstock. But it doesn't really matter.

[@schmoemi3386]

Epiphone changed their headstock shape in 2020 because of ths video! 😳😳😳

[@pedraw]

I don't look at the headstock when I play my Epiphone.

[@Wargasm644]

pedraw That’s why you play out of tune 😂

[@jeanbruzzi]

Great video! When Epiphone released their first Les Paul in 1989, it had an open book headstock, set neck, and humbuckers. From what I found online, the 1989 model was a very good copy of the Gibson Les Paul. Because of this, they made changes in the following years to make it more affordable.

[@plasticbleach4004]

Your music even puts the dog to sleep :)

[@joeblough261]

I have to say, Braun's playing in his videos is usually as tasty as can be. I really like his slow, melodic stuff. Better than a lot of famous people. But I guess with almost 800k subs, he's famous too now :)

[@mikeadams4605]

Both the Sheraton and the Casino have different headstocks than the Epiphone Les Paul. I have a Casino and it has a great headstock....just as unique as my Gibson Les Paul

[@inyourbusiness73]

I'm glad someone is finally talking about this subject.

[@ryann5247]

lol the dog must have to listen to him play all day every day, cuz he's looks so unimpressed

[@NJT1000]

Hi Darrell, your dog doesn't seem to care about headstock shapes but sure seems to appreciate your playing, as do I!

[@ronnienose8608]

I can't think of any other brand that uses a different headstock for their 'budget' brand. I mean, Fender don't change theirs on Squiers. I honestly think Gibson would sell more if they used the 'open-book' shape.

[@TheGalwayFarmer]

because vanity will drive people to buy gibsons purely for the shape of the headstock

[@andrewbryan359]

Ronnie Nose: I don't agree. Epiphone was a big brand before Gibson and they should keep their logo/headstock as it is!

[@oliverle8438]

I do agree with everything except Fender does technically change the headstock shape on the squiers. They almost all have CBS style headstocks, hence why there are bigger and fatter than regular, which other than the squiers are only seen on 70’s style models.

[@awoodstock_]

I’ve had an Epi LP for about 20 years, and I just bought a “real” Gibson. I was about to sell the old one, but I guess I’ll keep it, it’s a great “bang for the buck” guitar and my dad gave it to me. As for the headstock, I’ve never had a problem, I changed the nut and it improved a lot.

[@greatvanzini]

I always thought their HS looked good on their jazz boxes. But on solid bodies I thought they made them look neck heavy or It just seemed too big for smaller bodies. Good vid.

[@baumfr]

That's funny because my ES-339 semi-hollow body isn't clipped like an Epiphone Les Paul, but it's not exactly like a Gibson either.

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

Yeah, my BB King has the nice full Epi headstock too!

[@geetarislife2843]

I love my Epiphone les Paul Traditional pro 2 it's the best guitar I own now and always will be my favorite no matter how much of a better guitar I get my hands on. Mainly because it was my first serious guitar and my first les Paul (no I was not paid to say that)

[@jumpboy29]

The Epiphone head stock always reminds me of like a cello headstock or upright bass. Or maybe a G Clef note. It never bothers me, its kind of musical looking. The Gibson headstock is fine but looks sort of angular and rigid.

[@altrock86]

I agree once you see it it can't be unseen. I had an epiphone l.p. maybe 5 years ago, and my buddy was talking about how he didn't like the clipped ear head stock. I had never even noticed. After looking side by side I do find the gibson headstock to be more appealing.

[@icevelvetzen]

The audience won’t notice and probably can’t tell the difference between a guitar and a bass or a broomstick. Anyway, I own both.

[@scriptosaurusrex]

Vicious Velocious both a bass and a broomstick? 🤣

[@icevelvetzen]

Scriptosaurus rex hahaha. Yes.

[@trontosaurusrex9532]

I love Epiphone as well! Started on a SG special a friend gave me,and recently purchased a second hand Les Paul Custom Pro at my local music store! Plays and sounds great!

[@wowdogeful]

They should have less space between the last string post and the end of the headstock. Should have made the logo smaller and the headstock a bit shorter, right now it looks a bit disproportionate to me. Also please do more videos with your dog in them :)

[@baumfr]

Should have designed the headstock so the strings go straight, like the 1 and six strings; same for both Gibson and Epiphones.

[@CriolloJulio]

When I bought my Epiphone, my opinion about the headstock was the same of yours, but just at the beggining, then, with the time, I learn to love it... Currently I love my Epiphone, is just thing of get to use it

[@joshuahauser9050]

Ya I feel the same way about the epiphone headstocks. It’s always been a big turn off for me. It’s pretty sad that those crappy maestros get the nice Gibson headstock and the epis don’t. Great vid!

[@McBrownGuitar]

You can do the conversion in 2-3 hours,it's very easy,reshape the low side and add two moagany pieces on top. ;) Just paint it right

[@Shadowridercc]

I'm a fan!!!You've just said what I've always hated! When I walk into a music store and see the Epiphone section i just shake my head! What a beautiful guitar, totally ruined by that ridiculous design! And I thought I was the only one!!! Thank you for this video!! Cheers Charles Campbell

[@utubehound69]

Once you look past the headstock…. a world of classic instruments that you can own that are A+ quality for the price of a poorly made faded finish Gibson cheap $900-$2000 stripped down you could own a couple / few nice Epi's for the same money. The LP same woods but a thin veneer for the top. So what why hide all that beautiful wood under the surface ? They use a maple cap on mahogany w/a AAAA Top be it Veneer that's ok by me. You could get an SG & maybe even a 335 dot if you find a sale on or a blow out dude I saw the 2013 Gibson line SG LP w/P90 & HB pups get Blowed out for $350 !!!! . All three far better in quality & has the looks & there pups are really good now btw, than the Cheap "Gibson". Which is the better value? After all it was Epiphone that made Les's guitar come to life & made the pickups..because Gibson didn't have it set up yet the 1st Les Paul were partly made & designed at Epiphone they had made pickups for Gibson. I like my Epi's they all stay in tune can't say they for Gibson's I've played.

[@carloszamora9551]

What do you think about the Maestro Les Paul. I own a Maestro Les Paul Jr. In Black. I love mine. I really like the blueburst.

[@RandRgolfandgame]

You'll probably never see this comment, but I have something you may love. A 1986 Epiphone Les Paul. Didn't think it was real, but Gibson confirmed it for me. It is the most insane LP I've ever seen, a single bridge pickup with only a volume knob. Also, more curvature like a Strat. The headstock doesn't have the ears clipped either. Would you like me to make a video and show you?

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

Absolutely! Post a vid and let me know👍

[@RandRgolfandgame]

Darrell Braun Guitar alright bro, I'll have it up this week and post a link in whatever your most recent video will be for you if that'll work?

[@DarrellBraunGuitar]

For sure! If your comment gets lost in the shuffle, you can email me. The info in in my youtube Bio. ☺

[@francisd2386]

It's all brand turf protection IMO. And no, you didn't ruin my day. Love my Epi LP. Bought it last year about same time, can't put it down since. I would rather Epiphone offer more choices of finish for lefties than a Gibson headstock. I would jump in a heartbeat on a desert burst.

[@promerops]

In my oh so humble opinion, I don't see the lack of "ears" as something left off, but rather as something added - a refinement, in fact. Perhaps it's because I dabble in health and safety system auditing, and/or I'm prone to aichmophobia, that I prefer not to see anything sharp (oh, well, there go the SGs, and all florentine cutaways). From the practical, if not aesthetic viewpoint, the PRS headstock, as you have pointed out in the past, Darrell, beats them both. Thanks for the video.

[@tsiakkiros]

I see everyone in the comment section crowning the Epiphone headstock as the winner for several aesthetic, cosmetic, historical, and playability reasons. I agree. Epiphone for the win. PS: the original Les Paul is an Epiphone. It was designed at Epiphone’s HQ in New York, using Epiphone’s materials, equipment, machinery and general support. The prototypes would take months to make when Les switched from Epiphone to Gibson, so they scraped the Epiphone logo on the headstock and stenciled Gibson. Gibson’s historical claim to the Les Paul guitar is just unacceptable.

[@RC32Smiths01]

I really do love the Epiphone as well, but compared to an LP side by side, that headstock actually does look really lazy, odd one out and missed out design. Still, pretty solid in functionality and playability nevertheless!

[@andrewbryan359]

Not my experience!

[@HoiPolloi]

Absolutely why I can’t get into the Epiphone brand! Loved my old gold flake Riviera but hated the headstock; sold it. Thanks for the video!

[@josephetherton]

I still like the epiphone banana headstock best!!! ✌🎸😃

[@stankfanger1366]

*+Joseph Etherton* I gotta go with the batwing myself. It's on my absolute most favorite guitar, my 2001 Epiphone FAT 210 in the extremely rare Seafoam Green.

[@josephetherton]

Young Frankenstein Oh man I completely forgot about the batwing!!! The batwing is also a very cool headstock 😁✌🎸

[@baumfr]

Like the Epiphone Slasher. I was working on one a couple weeks ago and had no idea what it was. I had to search online to find out. Had never heard of it before that.

[@smbatman123]

The epiphone headstock only bothers me on the sg and les paul I love it on an es or jazz guitar

[@macaholic100]

There s a video on KZbin of Les Paul telling the story of how he convinced Gibson to buy Epiphone and how they were manufactured at the Gibson plant in the early days.

[@SionynJones]

That's right Les Paul saved epiphone

[@martb8022]

I think it has to do with personal experience. When I was a child, one of my brother's friends had a cherry burst epiphone les paul and I envied it (before I even played guitar). I still to this day find the headstock appealing... For those who ALWAYS saw epiphone as a discount brand, the association is different...

[@jumbosilverette]

You're right -- for lack a better term the epiphone headstock is more feminine; it's also more Italianate and art deco, even. That's why I prefer it to the Gibson. Btw, love the napping dog

[@godofthedesecrated7449]

Thanks for that Darrell. I've never really noticed the headstock differences, ever. Until you "pointed" out the difference I thought it had to do with the bump in the middle being different, Lol. Once I see it's a single cut I don't look too much farther up the neck than to see the brand, which tells me if I can afford to touch it or not, Lol.

[@ivanjelicic]

I love the epiphone but that headstock really needs to change

[@aaronwebb1548]

Well good news!

[@81giorikas]

didn't epiphone have that design stem from its own jazz semi line etc? By the way epiphone had also other headstocks through the years including the ones on the first batch of epiphone les pauls (with a rounded circular top), similar ones on the elite line, the ones that remind you of casinos etc on les paul anniversary of late and the normal open gibson book in asia. Yeah, in china mic epiphones are sold with the gibson headstock and the epiphone logo is now placed on the orville line in the fujigen factory made in japan guitars domestically speaking.