manish and 003 can be on either side....like..003 M_ 002 OR M OO3 _ 002
@suryavoroy3527 Жыл бұрын
critical point 1: We try attacking the spatial distribution first , we collate two conditions that same lang cannot sit opp each other and that atleast two people in between 2 chinese people from both left and right. critical point 2: trying fixing 5 on both the chinese one by one and see which one fits the bill of them not being consecutive numbers.
@lakshsethi8304 Жыл бұрын
5:00 Another case can be: "2 _ Manish 3"
@mahakgarg7047 жыл бұрын
also naman is sitting to the left of 006 isme hum immediate left kyu consider kar rh hai ? immediate word mention thodi hai
@kaustubhachanta34245 жыл бұрын
@@elitesgridCAT is this implicit always??
@sujalkumar12042 жыл бұрын
Yes .... Same thing ..... This solution is fully wrong as it is clearly mentioned that Naman is to the left of 006 and BETWEEN THEM TEHY SPEAK CHINESE AND RUSSIAN it means there must be an exact gap of 2 agents between them....neither more than taht nor less than taht
@lakshsethi8304 Жыл бұрын
@@sujalkumar1204 Lol no you are wrong. I am sorry but you need to work on your english.
@lakshsethi8304 Жыл бұрын
@@kaustubhachanta3424 No it is not. Mahak Garg is correct pointing out the fact that "immediate left" is not mentioned hence the solution maybe incorrect
@adityashikhar6143 Жыл бұрын
@@lakshsethi8304 I am writing this so that your misconception gets cleared. In circular arrangement questions, left is always seen as immediate left (obv. the same true holds for right too) as it is a closed figure and without this consideration the circle would be an endless loop of ambiguous directions (left or right).
@mahakgarg7047 жыл бұрын
sir by using 4th and 6th statements why cant naman sit 3rd to the left of chinese who is sitting in first circle at 3:41 you said this and then you changed the positions of 5 and 7
@aditisaxena8082 Жыл бұрын
Clue of statement 4 is not clear. There could be an issue to interpret it