Lunar Lake Launch: Performance and Features Overview | Talking Tech | Intel Technology

[@01ai01]

Thanks for making 16gb the base ram choice instead of 8gb. Looking forward to seeing the real world battery life of laptops with these chips!

[@lharsay]

That's shared between system and graphics, you kinda need the 32GB one as I consider 16GB to be the minimum these days for system on Windows.

[@VineethJose]

That's the 8GB equivalent for builtin AI (Apple intelligence, Co-pilot), LLMs in OS/apps to run.

[@panjak323]

​@@lharsayWindows doesn't use that much more RAM than macos, especially in 3rd party apps.

[@ReddyzFun]

I would love to know if there will be an option to add more RAM on the motherboard just like the old times or is it restricted to whatever comes with the processor?

[@runninginthe90s75]

Intel Lunar Lake is here to proof x86 CPU can be as efficient as ARM. Intel real comeback is here !!

[@gigamoment]

You think so? Let's see.. 😅

[@daneemark4266]

@@gigamoment yeah sure let's see my man

[@venividivici4253]

@@daneemark4266 I think he is a AMD fanboy.

[@semigene]

They should make this lady the next CEO. This is her first project, and probably the first Intel product to get excited about since Core in 2005/6

[@PartyofNone]

aye intel. come on we believe in you!! excited for the efficiency of lunar lake. pat never should’ve cancelled Royal Core

[@RotaryJunkie]

I'm not sure there's much difference between the hypothetical 6-but-actually-24 "huge" cores versus just having 24 "E" cores. Especially if we accidentally find a way to do the opposite, and let multiple E cores behave as singular giant cores.

[@jmtake85]

​@@RotaryJunkie24e is better than 24 thred 24/7

[@sandorbence2067]

It's been almost a decade since I was excited about anything from Intel but I'm really looking forward to Lunar Lake, especially in a good handheld.

[@Andrewskji]

I also think you can see the excitement when they know that they finally have cracked the code, this is a big moment.

[@tui3264]

excited for Lunar Lake, though it might take lot of time to reach to my village shop , I will try to contribute to open source projects to improve performance using lunar lake

[@matthewhayes7671]

Lunar Lake era let's go!

[@tui3264]

yeah, I never lost hope in Intel, lets go

[@AlexSchendel]

10:37 Why is a "9" denoted by an "8", a "7" denoted by a "6" or "5", and a "5" denoted by a "3" or a "2"? Who decided on this confusing and nonsensical numbering scheme? Why can't we just have "9" means "9", "7" means "7" and "5" means "5"?

[@Sreeha_S]

Way to go intel

[@cesare4926]

Anyone know where we can see somw reviews? Lunar Lake is my biggest hope for Intel rhght now

[@qweasdzxc]

Arrow Lake is launching pretty much the same time, but the amount of information about it coming from intel is like 20 times smaller than the amount of information about Lunar Lake, why is that?

[@zachb1706]

Laptops are a bigger market, and Arrow Lake is not as big of a jump as Lunar Lake is.

[@auritro3903]

​@@zachb1706 Arrow Lake is a big jump, especially when your previous generation consumes like 300W and is crashing.

[@auritro3903]

@qwdeaszxc Arrow Lake launch date is on October 17th, we should learn more about it then Arrow Lake is also largely based on Lunar Lake, just that it's more optimised for performance than efficiency.

[@zachb1706]

@@auritro3903 it’ll be a good jump, nothing like Lunar Lake. It’ll more or less look like a Meteor Lake chip, just with the new cores which bring with them a decent IPC uplift. Wheres Lunar Lake was a complete revamp

[@j340_official]

I’m excited for arrow lake. But lunar lake is looking very good. Skymont and Xe2 and Lion Cove to the rescue.

[@christopherallard1693]

The core ultra 7 155h has 22 threads with 3 different types of cores. lunar lake skus of the same tier cap out at 8 threads with p cores and low power e cores... not sure how to feel about that. No doubt it'll be more efficient but how will multithreaded performance be affected by this... limiting choice of core config

[@kericsX]

Where can i get this Lunar Lkae CPU for my showcase? I am in few Days on the IFA :)

[@GodzillaGoesGaga]

Are the features of the new Lunar Lake CPUs fully supported by Microsoft OS ?

[@poziom500]

With the next Windows Update, they will release patch to integrate CoPilot AI with Lunar lake, so I believe answer is yes.

[@sanchalasenadeera2151]

I3 380m and I love intel

[@KunalBuddhewar]

Hey why don't you try integrating storage in SOC for quicker app opening an increased gaming performance via a new storage and ram and gpu integration technology

[@frankwong9486]

Memory on package isnt something apple already did on m1 ?

[@Coconutgl]

Intel made the same claim when Meteor lake launched which performance better than AMD, especially on gaming around 15% faster, however the truth is Intel has no match on that. Will the same story happen again?

[@EnochGitongaKimathi]

This is a great product. It would have been even better with integrated Thunderbolt 5. Shame Intel sold their 5G because integrating that would also be huge. Curious what the next product with memory on package will be. Make sure it has integrated Thunderbolt 5. x86 is back!

[@lesterjadeuntal931]

For now it integrated the Thunderbolt 4 tech.

[@EnochGitongaKimathi]

@@lesterjadeuntal931 Thunderbolt 4 has been integrated since the release in 2020 with 11th Gen Intel Tiger Lake and every other Generation after that. Since the release on Thunderbolt 5 in late 2023, we have had the release of Intel Core Ultra Series (100 and 200) Meteor Lake and now Lunar Lake, both without Thunderbolt 5 integrated.

[@Andrewskji]

There will be an epic crash in the AMD stock price now, its one of the most overpriced companies in the world. If Intel keeps innovating in the GPU space the situation looks dire for AMD.

[@Jerome-iwnl]

I hope it's actually the most efficient chip based on 3rd party reviews and benchmarks.

[@Jerome-iwnl]

You better have 32gb ram at a good price!

[@willberry6434]

Just make everything at TSMC at this point

[@netbat4399]

no overclockable all cpu igpu?

[@LeonardTavast]

It's optimized for perf/W. Overlocking significantly reduces efficiency.

[@zachb1706]

Overclocking has been dead for years

[@impuls60]

@@zachb1706 Are sleeping under a rock? Igpu overclocking has been achiving 20-30% on both Amd and Intel last gen.

[@Peteryzhang]

The memory better got perfect quality, otherwise if there's a memory problem, you need to replace the whole CPU! And how about I need some extra memory? Can I also add memory the traditional way?

[@rampratheesh3874]

memory won’t repair easily

[@zachb1706]

No you can’t add memory.

[@panjak323]

RAM doesn't fail, unless you push the voltage. Infact the RAM chips are rated for 100+ years

[@zachb1706]

@@panjak323 yeah exactly, your CPU will fail before your RAM.

[@Decki777]

Intel cooked AMD 😅

[@holyearth]

Uhmm no , pat cancelled Royal core, Intel has Boeing’d themselves

[@Decki777]

@@holyearth nope Intel needs more time to get their fab right untill that Intel will use TSMC.

[@holyearth]

@@Decki777 “more time to get their fab right” dude the 13th/14th gen processors are frying themselves!!!

[@Decki777]

@@holyearth frying Intel CPUs are over exaggerated. Just lock all cores and manually set the Voltage to under 1.35v on intel 13th and 14th gen CPUs

[@holyearth]

@@Decki777 If I have to do that and it no longer hits advertised specs then that's false advertising

[@gigamoment]

Sorry Intel, you were milking the customers money the last decade without giving anything back. You don't deserve our respect anymore.

[@dantevale0]

You guys are leaning into the "grandma" meme huh. Nice

[@zanekaminski]

Given all this Raptor Lake stuff why call it Core Ultra 200V series? “Due to an error in the power management microcode 200 volts may have been applied to your CPU. Affected customers should contact Intel for RMA.” 😅

[@AlexandruCarjan]

Why did you announce today something that was being sold for a while now?

[@lendumore]

Becasue it's a dead boomer company that's still stuck in the late 90's

[@panjak323]

It wasn't lol

[@Sean-km7ht]

Y'all lost me with integrated memory. CAMM doesn't yet hit those speeds, but is better than so-dimm while still allowing replaceable/upgradable memory. Then again, you may still get my money on a discrete Battlemage GPU for my media server if the power draw is in check this time around. While I am disappointed in this, I will still give Intel credit for their Quick-Sync support and having some of the best encoder/decoder quality and support in that segment

[@J_Echoes]

I feel like integrated memory can be justified for this sort of low-power chips, as long as they're actually efficient and using high-bandwidth memory that may take a while to appear on CAMM2. Guess we'll see: if they keep it for higher-power chips or make something like in-package DDR5-6400 then that'll be a huge disappointment.

[@zachb1706]

Integrated memory is cheaper and has a lower power draw, for most consumers it’s an obvious choice. Arrow Lake still has upgradable memory

[@kazumakazuma5814]

Why are you talking about performance with a marketing person?

[@schoolstuff5235]

Product Management isn’t Marketing.

[@lendumore]

Same reason why Gelsinger posts bible quotes all over his twitter. It's called clueless

[@kazumakazuma5814]

@@schoolstuff5235 Product managers and product marketers have many similar roles.

[@kazumakazuma5814]

@@schoolstuff5235 Product managers and product marketers have many similar roles.

[@holyearth]

Because marketing will hype, engineering will tell you the real situation: oxidation and over voltage problems causing degradation

[@kylorokx1552]

CAN IT BEAT APPLE'S M4??? JUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS! TOO MUCH JARGON!

[@holyearth]

Manini you failed drastically on the 13th and 14th gen, oxidation issues, overvoltage issues - class action lawsuits and massive brand reputation losses. Where is the accountability??

[@__aceofspades]

They already completely fixed that issue with BIOS updates, warranty extended from 3 to 5 years for anyone that is concerned. Intel handled it well once the issue was found.

[@holyearth]

@@__aceofspadesit’s not completely fixed and it’s not that simple, these chips were physically damaged you can’t software upgrade your way out of that

[@SY-zv2cz]

@@holyearth get a replacement if your chip had a voltage failure. If its still running take the added warranty + the micro code fix. I think its a win win situation.

[@zachb1706]

@@holyearthif they’re damaged you can get a replacement

[@holyearth]

@@zachb1706 RMA denied

[@FiveTimeZero]

Intel just separated the power delivery of the P and E cores.They can completely turn off the P core. Simply its work on the E core for daily bases, but its going to slow as f*k. If you want to fast as Macbook ,power consumption is going to skyrocket, efficiency sucks as usal can't compete with M3 and X Elite. Plus, Intel uses his RAM because that's the only thing they can improve efficacy, but it's going to be costly as f*K.

[@KoczulMoczul]

how do you know that, buddy? Did Intel sent you a sample laptop and you had already tested it or what? If not, don't post such comments

[@nnnnnn3647]

Is this English or something?

[@lendumore]

This lady can't even articulate the value of this product lol! Dead company..Delist it & turn it to a penny stock. They brought it onto themselves.