Burns said we have been aiding Taiwan with "defensive" weapons for 55 years! And it is reasonable under our treaty; And China is to blame when it is doing business with Russia. If you dig into the conversation, you will be shocked by two words - hypocrisy and self-contradiction.
@mingli-oi3vu6 ай бұрын
没有现实意义的历史文件
@dancnfoo6 ай бұрын
Is Taiwan threatening to invade China? Did Ukraine send troops Russia and proclaim Russia is no longer a country? Is it a contradiction to condame the rapist and its accomplice and providing pepper spray to the victim?
@alexwang69076 ай бұрын
Taiwan doesn't kill chinese, nor planing to kill Chinese. Taiwan buyes weapons is self defense. Do you have FKing brain?
@perotaccc87326 ай бұрын
Russia is invading Ukraine, if your brain is working properly, you won't say such stupid things, typical Chinese, without logical facts and narrow biases
@没有你们6 ай бұрын
@user-sg2xj6fn3l 低能
@260765bellamy6 ай бұрын
Forever will just criticize what china doing is wrong but never talk about What USA had done to the world .. that’s the double standards form USA.
@幽州庶人6 ай бұрын
西方政客,检讨自己不如批评别人。
@dancnfoo6 ай бұрын
Common logic of little pinks - if you eat shit, I'm going to eat a bigger piece.
You expect China to be neutral, but try everything against China. LOL. Like are you neutral about Taiwan? what a JOKE?
@realmaozhedong6 ай бұрын
fun fact, the "china" that defeated japan in ww2 is the current taiwan.
@a51b786 ай бұрын
@@realmaozhedong 可以的,死去那么多共产党军人抗日,功劳都被台湾省抢了。
@NaiyinTan6 ай бұрын
@@realmaozhedong fun fact, the "china" that got defeated by Jap in ww2 fled to taiwan🤮
@NaiyinTan6 ай бұрын
@@realmaozhedong fun fact, that "china" that defeated by Jap in ww2 then also got defeated by CCP, fled to taiwan....
@mycleshi52796 ай бұрын
@@realmaozhedongFun fact, Taiwan was colonized by Japan during ww2, and thousands of taiwanese joined Japanese army to invade mainland China and southeast Asia🫡
I am always amazed by how these politicians are so good at trash talking!
@123-h5i5y5 ай бұрын
We can excuse a politician talking this way in order to seek votes and whose hands being greased by lobbies but he is an ambassador to China, the top diplomat who is supposed to be fair, circumspective . If an ambassador can behave so biased this way and the American media and politicians are nearly all sinophobic, then US- China relations still has a long time to go before there can be back to normal and respectful. I sometimes wonder whether he is in China to enhance relations with his country or to make it worse. He is certainly the worst US ambassador to date certainly not in the calibre of James Lilley or Stapleton Roy.
@eagle0225 ай бұрын
@@123-h5i5y You make it sound like the ambassador is the reason for the deterioration of US-China relations, but what about the dictator who supports Russia in the war in Ukraine?
@123-h5i5y5 ай бұрын
@@eagle022 Don't just ape the western media . China is having a trade relations with Russia and if you hsve evidence it is supplying arms to Russia bring it up. Besides, Ukraine is as much to blame for the war as Russia. Go google the reasons if you pretend not to know.
@jinyatian62373 ай бұрын
@@eagle022 what a stupid logic, it has nothing to do that Burns is doing BAD job.
@fangtom91286 ай бұрын
It is first time to see BBC asked relatively objective questions, such as asking USA also subsidized, but this US China embassador is just too politic right
The US ambassador's words are contradictory. The output of Windows systems produced by Microsoft Corporation in the United States exceeds the domestic demand by many times, and it is also overcapacity? China supports contact between the Chinese and American people, but the United States always selects people who oppose the Chinese government to contact. Is this contact or subversion?
It is hard to believe that an ambassador, a top diplomat, could be so blatantly bad mouth another country like a third grader. Very low and unprofessional.
The Ambassador Burns brought Pride and Prejudice to life so vividly. All the rhetoric exists merely to serve America's aggressive diplomatic strategy. The end of a good interactive relationship is marked by the moment you decide to see him as a competitor. From then on, you view everything he does as a threat to yourself, harbor hostility towards him, and plan to take him down.
"it's ok for G7 to provide weapons to Ukraine, and it's not ok for China to do business with Russia"
@CommanderLol886 ай бұрын
@shanxieddie One simple question: Who invaded Ukraine
@maheping79246 ай бұрын
@@CommanderLol88 china trade with Ukraine too
@shanxieddie6 ай бұрын
@@CommanderLol88 dude this is not a simple question. why the fuk you fuking idiots just wont understand why Russia is preventing NATO to expand to its neighbor? are you all just fuking retarded?
@maronlee61526 ай бұрын
@@CommanderLol88是谁入侵了巴勒斯坦
@CommanderLol886 ай бұрын
@maronlee6152 Wrong question, It is who invaded Isreal, but please don't change topic. I don't think changing topic is a wise and polite act in answering my last question.
Former US top strategist Zbignew Brzezinski said: “It is IMPERATIVE that no Eurasian challenger emerges capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also challenging America”. Because the US has just 4% of world’s population, and it’s isolated from Eurasia which has 70% of world’s population, or 87% with Africa included. Defensively, it’s a benefit to the US, but economically, it’s a handicap. How the US with an isolated 4% of world’s population stays a world hegemon? The dollar must stay as the world’s reserve currency. This allows the size of the US economy to be highly scaled up, instead of being limited by the fundamentals. To be the world’s reserve currency, the dollar must circulate in the world. The US created a huge consumption economy and moved manufacturing outside, so that dollars flow out of the US to manufacturers like China or Japan. To make products, China & Japan need energy. So dollar is then circulated to Saudi mandated by the Petrol-dollar scheme. With the US stock and financial market much more lucrative than others, the dollars from Saudi are attracted back to the US. Money printed in the US to exchange for goods from outside ends up in Wall Street, where the rich gets richer. And that completes the cycle of circulation of the dollar. If China or Japan brings back all the dollars and exchange to their local currencies, it inflates the local currencies, making their exports expensive. So, China & Japan use some of the dollars to buy US debts (Treasury Securities). That’s why the US, a rich country, is in-debt to China which has just 20% of the US’ GDP/cap. By holding US debts, China & Japan have to support the dollar. Since the US’ debt is in its own currency, it can simply print more dollar to pay interests. Other countries have to earn dollars to pay their debts, failing which results in defaults. In 2011 Obama announced “Pivot to Asia” to stop China’s rise. In 2013 China responded with the Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI) and diverted US debts into BRI projects. The BRI creates new economies, hence new trade markets for China. If Asia & Africa develop, the share of the US’ economy shrinks, another currency could replace dollar as the world’s reserve currency. Then the US would no longer be able to print money freely without a hyperinflation like in Venezuela. And the size of the US economy has to fall back to the fundamentals, which is a lot smaller than the inflated economy. That’s why no country in Eurasia is allowed to catch up with the US’ economy. When Japan was catching up fast on the US in late 80s, it’s knocked down to a 3-decade stagnancy by rising Yen (Plaza Accord). And in the last 30 years, the US created wars and color revolutions in the Middle East, Central Asia & Africa to destabilise the region, and the World Bank & IMF keep them poor. As the US prints excessively, other countries’ dollar reserves are devalued. Furthermore, to prevent exports to the US becoming expensive, these countries have to print money too, which devalues the savings of the people and causes inflation. It’s estimated that our savings devalue by 6% per year after the abolishment of the gold-backed Bretton Woods system, after which the US prints money based on just the creditability of the dollar. Free money allows the US to have a big military, and the big military in return, protects the dollar. The US had no mercy on threats to the dollar: In 2000 Saddam Hussein said he would sell oil in Euros not Dollars. Saddam was hanged by the US. In 2009 Gaddafi wanted to make Libya export oil in pan-Africa Gold Dinars, not in dollar or Euro. Gaddafi was killed by US & Sarkozy-backed NTC. Iran has been trading oil in currencies other than US dollars since 2011. Iran was sanctioned by the US. After being sanctioned in 2014, Putin started to trade in non-dollar. By 2019, Putin: (1) completely ditched dollars in oil trades, (2) sold almost all US debts, (3) is now the forerunner in de-dollarization. The US tried to topple Putin by supporting Alexei Navalny, sanctioned Russia, and now the Ukraine war to weaken Russia. China: (1) created the BRI, (2) uses non-dollar in oil trades with Iran & Russia, (3) created the CIPS, an alternative to the SWIFT system now weaponised by the US to sanction 39 states, (4) China’s economy and high-tech are catching up fast, (5) China is the biggest economy in BRICS. The US started a hybrid war against China: Trade war in 2018. Hong Kong color revolution in 2019. Tech blockage (Huawei ban, EUV banned from ASML). Got Australia into a trade war with China in 2020. Created “Uyghur Genocide” & “Forced Labor” propagandas against Xinjiang (XJ), which is the hub of the BRI, to cut off the BRI. Sanctioned goods from XJ to create joblessness and uprising against the gov. After XJ was stabilized by China, the US orchestrated a coup in Kazakhstan in Jan ‘22, located right next to XJ, to cut off the BRI. In Aug ‘22, Pelosi visited Taiwan to provoke a civil war. In 2023, the US stirred tensions in the South China Sea through its proxy Marcos, whose father had a lot of assets in the US. If a country supports the dollar, it is looted by the US; if a country doesn’t support the dollar, the gov is changed by the US. This is financial colonialism. The US can’t have direct wars with Russia and China as they are nuclear armed. Proxy wars put the battlefields outside of the US, and also allow the US to disguise as an outsider. In the 1980s, the US supported the Afghan Mujaheddin in a similar proxy war against the USSR. Russia and China have clear redlines (*Russia: Ukraine a neutral buffer + Ethnic Russian’s safety in Donbas. *China: “One China principle”). The US used its proxies in Kiev and Taipei to step over the redlines to provoke wars, and got its allies to support the wars. After the Maidan coup by the US in 2014, Ukrainian army began shelling ethnic Russians in Donbas. It subsided after Minsk agreements in 2014/15, but as disclosed by Poroshenko in June ‘22, and by Merkel & Hollande in Dec ‘22, the Minsk were intended to buy time to arm Ukraine against Russia, not to seek peace. The US occupied Afghanistan for 20 years, but it finally left in Aug ‘21, evidently to prepare for the Ukraine project 6 months later. In Sep ‘21 Zelensky visited Biden to get support to join NATO, and shelling in Donbas by Ukrainian forces up 2800% since 16 Feb ‘22 (OSCE data), crossing Putin’s redlines and provoked the war. Pelosi visited Taiwan in Aug ‘22, after which China surrounded Taiwan with battleships. Historically, the US’ strategy against China-Russia has always been “one at a time” to avoid pushing them together. The move to put Russia forward amidst the on-going hybrid war against China, was due to a major development: The Fed has issued 80% of all US dollars in market in just 24 months during the pandemic. There was $4 trillion in circulation at the beginning of 2020. The number reached $20 trillion by Oct 2021. As a dollar printed is backed by a dollar debt, a large amount of US debt need to be sold. Coupled with a global move to diversify into non-dollar reserves fuelled by US sanctions & the dollar’s declining creditability, the US is in a financial crisis. The US proxy war in Ukraine: 1.Strengthened the dollar by weakening Euro. It happened before in NATO's bombing of Serbia in 1999 (2 months after Euro became the currency of EU). A strong dollar and the Fed’s timely interest rise, created a giant magnet attracting capitals from all over the world into the US. 2.Divided Russia from Europe. As the first NATO chief, Hastings Ismay described NATO’s role: “To keep America IN, to keep Russia OUT, to keep Germany DOWN”. NATO also allows the US to station missiles in Europe, keeping the US safe across the Atlantic. 3.Halted Nord Stream, and German firm Energie Baden-Wuerttemberg signed up gas from America Venture Global LNG for 20 years. >the US wrestled from Russia the control of energy to Europe. As George Friedman of US think tank Chicago Council OGA said in 2015:”The US’ primary fear is the marriage of German technologies and Russian resources”. And Condoleezza Rice said in 2014:”You (Europe) want to depend more on the North American energy platform, the enormous bounty of oil and gas we’re finding in America, not on pipelines through Ukraine or Russia.” 4.Pushes industries back to the US soil by de-industrializing Europe, as indicated by: (i) The US’ sabotage of N.S. pipelines and US gas sold 4x the price, (ii) The US’ proposed sanction on Algeria after Macron visited Algeria for a gas deal in Aug ‘22, (iii) The foiled sabotage on TurkStream pipeline which feeds Russian gas to Europe via Turkey in Oct ‘22, (iv) The US’ Inflation Reduction Act in Aug ‘22 which pulls capitals from Europe. Despite the self-damage, the EU still gives unconditional support to Ukraine. In fact, two European countries (Ukraine and Germany’s N.S.) were attacked in 2022, NATO helped Non-Ally Ukraine, but Ally Germany was ignore. It’s NEVER about justice. Boris Johnson visited Kiev 3 times, to stop Zelensky from peace talk w Russia. Leaders in Europe, the elites loyal to the US, are pinning hopes on Ukraine defeating Russia to say job done to Washington. Zelensky is advertised a hero to get public support. The US is pushing Europe and Asia into wars. Remember after WW2, Europe and Asia were devastated, but the US emerged from the Great Depression, became the world leader and the dollar became the world’s reserve currency.
Hi BBC, Burns has been on multiple US media delivering his narratives. Why don't you also interview UK ambassador to China? Let's hear more perspectives.
wa o, some views really not good for Chinese People,For example,The policy about Taiwan. I believe 99.99 percentage of Chinese think It is a duty that get Taiwan back to mainland.
@waynegore52916 ай бұрын
Kurt Campbell said chinese student should study humianity and social science only. Tom Cotton said Chinese student should study Shakspear only. I have to say those americans lost their minds, became dilusional.
@Diderot686 ай бұрын
Smiley wicked assh…. He will be remembered as the ambassador who cannot improve the relationship between the two countries. He will have to bear the blame if the two countries were to fight a war.
@pbaa64946 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing
@user-37216 ай бұрын
给大使点赞🎉
@MR-ob6rj6 ай бұрын
敬劝国人,放弃幻想,准备斗争!
@任百川-c2l5 ай бұрын
让对中国有如此敌意的人担任驻中国大使,真是讽刺!
@yindu_Weige8886 ай бұрын
*谢谢分享!晚上好。*
@莫源兴6 ай бұрын
In the video, Burns have been farting for 18 minutes and the lady is enjoying the smelly air so much.
@zhang22926 ай бұрын
听这些人讲话就是浪费时间😂
@mantinwong64796 ай бұрын
非常誠懇的模樣,一本正經的歪理。
@bin.s.s.6 ай бұрын
浪费点时间看看什么是愚蠢和不要脸。
@eddyqu69166 ай бұрын
actually, in our eyes, the US Indo alliance is also a lose alliance, if US is doing the right thing, why US need allies? like walking in the dark with fearness, need some companion?
@kinleongchan23106 ай бұрын
The U.S. Ambassador to China gave a very good answer
@lijunzhou44566 ай бұрын
Really good video 👍 China USA relationship is most important on this century
Gerat interview and insights from Nicholas Burns. Except towards the end, Burns said China is sending conflicting signals in the area of bringing people together. It is not conflicting at all if he has a deeper understanding in Chinese government. Chinese government would love to bring in as much American business to shore up government controlled businesses, in which the government reap the bulk of the benefits. It can care less about civilian businesses. The fact they are preventing civilians to leave the country freely is exactly to prevent the outflow of its "hard earned" money.
@廖传希6 ай бұрын
一如既往的支持国产
@junguo37435 ай бұрын
please Burns don't lies yourself, you know the truth.
A country ambassador is fundamentally expected to build bridge in the relationship, that is the nature of foreign diplomacy. But some has a thought, ambassador job is to pursue on finger pointing and endless enmity.