M Theory | Towards a theory of everything?

[@ScienceClicEN]

There is a widespread misunderstanding about the search for quantum gravity in general. We know that quantum gravity works up to the Planck scale, which is ridiculously small. In other words, we know that our current models should work for all experiments we can make today, and further, at least for a very long time. We even know how to calculate the first quantum corrections to gravity (see the beginning of the video). This implies, therefore, that all attempts at formulating a fundamental theory for quantum gravity (not just M theory / string theory, but really ALL attempts) MUST be fundamentally untestable, at least for now and probably for a very long time. This is not a problem of the theories. As of today the goal has never really been to make new predictions that are testable, because we know this is impossible until far out in the future. It might even be fundamentally impossible (some researchers think it's fundamentally impossible to observe gravitons for example). So the goal is really just to try to find a mathematical framework within which we could calculate the higher quantum corrections to gravity. Many people actually think that most attempts will actually turn out to be equivalent. It is thought for instance that many theories can be formulated in terms of a string theory. In other words, string theory might be a universal language to write theories.

[@michael-4k4000]

String Theory is a joke right? ✅️

[@canna-kun]

I understand that string theory is interesting, but I don't understand why it is mixed with physics topics. I mean, the whole idea of physics is to be able to do experiments to verify hypotheses.

[@randymartin5500]

@@canna-kun that's why it's theoretical physics, which is the first place in the scientific method from an observation of gravity waves, to begin the quest to develop experiments to test the quantization of a gravity wave.

[@hackerbrinelam5381]

I definitely learn to apperiate String Theory thanks to You, @ScienceClicEN , I once thought its mumbo gumbo when coming to make provable prediction and is some sort of mathmatical conspiracy that make development of Physics into standstill, and make me understand the truth behind the curtain of scary naming conventions and seemingly weird implications that created by media hype of being the theory of everything

[@redandblue1013]

Really..? I'm not sure I can take you at your word for something like this tbh

[@ediedisonlo]

Easily the best channel for space time, general relativity, quantum theory and more. Thx for making such complex and abstract idea way more easy to understand.

[@bblunder]

Within 2 videos (String Theory and What if we could see space time?) I just found many answers to my questions and understand the modern physics way better. It's just increadible how this channel did this. I was always interested to these topics since i was a child and i am currently a high school student who wants to study physics in the university. It's my my childhood dream.

[@kseriousr]

I can usually follow through, but this one flew right above my head.

[@thedeemon]

Naturally, as they just mention some opaque names without even trying to describe their actual meaning. One needs to spend years learning graduate level maths and physics to actually understand the ideas.

[@kezzyhko]

​@dhhfrbhrjrbrjrjrhjdjdj have you heard of The Dunning-Kruger effect?

[@jamesblackburn6139]

@dhhfrbhrjrbrjrjrhjdjdj As Richard Feynman said “If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics.”

[@ponponpatapon9670]

@dhhfrbhrjrbrjrjrhjdjdj lol ok

[@Yak497]

Your age does not matter. It is the use of words or terminology that are specific to a field that would not be common to someone that is not familiar with that field or terminology. It is almost like speaking another language. If you do not understand the meaning behind the words or terminology then you will struggle to understand the whole concept.

[@isoxsniper4307]

This channel must never stop

[@Hansulf]

Can you go one by one and also explain the other unification theories as well as you explained this one? Amazing video!

[@rohanshah7960]

Yes please that'd be awesome, YT is full of explainers on string/M theory. But videos on other models are sparse.

[@kapoioBCS]

@@rohanshah7960for loop gravity there exist a lot of videos! But for the dynamical triangulations for example, I think it is very hard to produce a pop science video because it is too a technical attempt to make a statistical model of quantum gravity and it is mostly math without many tangible images to communicate to the public. It is also very under-researched because most physicists does not find it promising enough

[@kapoioBCS]

@@rohanshah7960I had the pleasure of taking a course on the subject by one of the pioneers of this model when I was doing my MSc and he wasn’t to fond of this model anymore :/

[@Hansulf]

@@kapoioBCS Why? Because you need a particle accelerator the size of our solar system to prove it right? 😂 Or because you can model many many universes with it?

[@corsaircaruso471]

Oh, I vote for this!

[@dafdaf4052]

I remembered this channel existed once again. Don't stop making videos man, I understand it takes a huge amount of time, but you obviously have the talent and background for this.

[@PolarTheIcebear-xl8ts]

I love watching these videos because they are actually difficult to understand

[@darthvader6588]

but somehow they are yet simple enough that you can kind of grasp what theyre actually talking about

[@DeveloperJake]

They do a great job at explaining really complex topic with those graphics

[@Tanvir_Ahmed_Earth]

Not that difficult

[@justindc05]

@@Tanvir_Ahmed_Earth Another ignorant comment lol.. You have that much trouble saying anything positive? What may be difficult for someone may not be the case for someone else which is one of the many things that make us "individuals" To the vast majority of people who are just partially interested in science and watch videos such as these obviously its going to be difficult to grasp abstract concepts of physics that takes many years to understand

[@kapoioBCS]

Sorry, I am really curious to understand what it is so hard about this video? It is an amazing pop science video of M-theory/String theory but of course has all the complicated notions and math left out. So how is this harder than just a video of facts? I am not condescending, just trying to understand :)

[@ryno7437]

Every time you hear that intro jingle, you know some serious learning is about to go down. Man I love this channel. I feel like it explains things so much clearer than other channels, which isn’t a knock on them. Anyways, I been like I’ve seen a lot of new videos on M theory lately. Not sure if it’s just a coincidence. Can’t wait to dive in!

[@jackkrauser1763]

Yeah as much as it is amazing that actually comes with a cost which is taking a long time to make a video

[@smit_1449]

To think just 100,000 years ago we were roaming the fields of Africa buck naked and now we are capable of comprehending such a complex and abstract subject. It blows my mind

[@basspuppy133]

To think that 100 years ago we didn't even fully understand nuclear fusion, and 150 years before that we had just figured out electricity existed. Our progress gets exponential faster each decade. Imagine in 50 years.

[@lyznav9439]

So you were they annoying naked guy

[@lepidoptera9337]

@@basspuppy133 In 50 years AI will probably have worked it all out for us and we will be realizing that it will take us 150 years to understand its solution. ;-)

[@csammy123]

I kinda like the idea of roaming the fields buck naked. I bet there were many orgies back then.

[@csammy123]

@@basspuppy133 I like 1000 year jumps in civilization because it's not too long and not too short in terms of humanity. In 1024 AD we didn't even know North and south America existed, it might as well have been a parallel universe with its own history. It was also sandwiched between the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of the European empires. People were sufficiently advanced for its time as far as supporting civilization. They likely thought they were advanced just as we think we are advanced today with our modern comforts. I have no doubt 1000 years from now in 2124 we will see a similar leap in civilization and understanding of science. We will not be talking about Newton or Einstein, but whoever the masterminds is of that era (and it could potentially be AI that makes discoveries instead of humans).

[@lucaspimentell9772]

Today is my birthday and this is a greatest gift i could ask. Thanks Scienceclic!

[@ScienceClicEN]

Happy birthday 🎂

[@lucaspimentell9772]

@@ScienceClicEN Thanks 😁

[@Nickname006]

Thanks to all the scientists who spend their lives studying these! These people are rare, because they require no practical meaning for their work. They are placing large bets by spending their lifetimes working on these theories. But when they get it right, it is the most important thing ever done.

[@ConsecDesign]

when they "get it right", what is supposed to happen?

[@Nickname006]

@@ConsecDesign Who knows? Anything can happen when we understand the laws of the Universe. Understanding the deepest nature of our Universe also has immense worth in itself.

[@Rationalific]

@@ConsecDesign Electricity that can be utilized by humans, motor vehicles, barcode scanners, computers (of course, most of these latter things are based on the utilization of electricity as well), atomic bombs...pretty much anything you can think of that would not have existed a thousand years ago came from one discovery or another. And often, not much at all comes from a random discovery...though discoveries about the fundamental nature of the universe might have a greater chance to yield more use cases than a discovery that is very niche. It depends on the discovery and its usefulness when applied to society. The thing is, nobody can truly predict the main applications that will come after a discovery. The discovery has to happen first. Certainly, without researchers (including individuals who tested things in olden days), humans would be living like other animals (which might have been better in general for the earth, but that's a whole other discussion). And discoveries over the past 400 years or so produced our modern world (again, for better or worse).

[@neo-soul7779]

@@ConsecDesign The more we understand about the laws of the universe, the better our technology gets for one.

[@FreakGUY-007]

​@@Nickname006 do you such channels for theoreitcal biology or neuroscience?... I mean not those pop sci channels but contains some rigorus things ..

[@parrotkoi4048]

This video was unbelievably good. I’ve heard that string theory is “a lot of algebraic topology” but this is the first time I’ve seen it illustrated. This is the very best physics explainer channel out there and I’m so glad you’re continuing to make videos. Thank you so much!

[@ThemasterScorpion]

I do not doubt that this is the best physics channel ever on KZbin, my favourite channel for sure, it's unfortunate that your channel is underatted I definitely believe that u deserve more recognition

[@katakana1]

Well, I r8 this gr8 channel 8/8, no clickb8

[@Goldfish1060]

It is amazing channel. And explains complex subjects so well. For example, Vertusium tried explaining how gravity isn’t a force but a bend in space time but he explained the concept a billion times better

[@feedcount]

The European's aren't dumbing it down!!!

[@breveennkukan3603]

I am astounded at how far science has come that we are so close to finding a theory of everything.

[@Aj-tu4gv]

Creation energy exists outside the universe, each universe has its own multiversem and each multiverse probably has its own multiverse. Universe is created by creation energy. 7 chakras, 3rd eye, genie objects, stargates, shiva lingams, astras mahabarata weapons, ark of the covenant. Souls of stars and planets.

[@breveennkukan3603]

@@Aj-tu4gv If you say so. We have to drop what is false and seek the Truth. The truth is what makes your life better.

[@Aj-tu4gv]

@@breveennkukan3603 creation energy, multiverse, universe has its own multiverse and maybe each multiverse has its own multiverse.

[@Cosmicsense_]

Explaining the very fundamental nature of our universe and our leading theories that attempt to do so was so well incapsulated in this video, KZbinrs like you are a gift to society! Please share this video and help him out guys.

[@curiousuranus810]

But it's not explaining the very fundamental nature of our universe - very, very, very far from it.

[@Cosmicsense_]

@@curiousuranus810 it would if we find evidence for it :)

[@curiousuranus810]

@@Cosmicsense_ This is how religions start.

[@armanimationn]

Calling him a youtuber is the same as if you called a standup comedian Netflixer after watching his Netflix original. But I sure get you they are a gift gor us😊

[@omarezwawi6407]

I really think this is one of the best videos I've ever watched on youtube. Please, please I beg you to continue your divulgative effort also at this level of complexity and detail, maybe even beyond. Masterpiece of a channel, your animations and scripts are superb

[@igornovoselov3858]

beautifully animated as per usual, 8:12 looks really cool!

[@MaxHackbarth]

I’ve only recently found this channel, loved the string theory video and watched it 3 times. Thank you for “part two”

[@jackrabbitism]

I had been waiting for this for 2 years. You have not disappointed.

[@ivanstojanac7752]

How do you keep doing this. Explaining very complex theories and concepts in a (relatively) easy way. Amazing!

[@dimi3978]

As is usually the case with physics, behind complicated math lies an elegant intuition.

[@KaminariHouse]

Heh, relatively.

[@OriginalOmgCow]

The relative intuition is there to make the mathematics easier to understand, but it doesn't have to be intuitive at all, it's just we use that for conveance on information. It's rather far more complex and hard to understand especially when you get down to the actual numbers.

[@GabrielyanAkop]

I was waiting for this video since the string theory one. Thanks so much to Alessandro and the ScienceClic Team!

[@RTDD-gc4je]

icl this is like the best physics channel on youtube - interesting topics, great visuals and explained in an understandable way. there arent many channels like that and im glad i found this one !!

[@TheInternetcord]

"We just need to grow the 11th dimension" - People wouldn't believe the quotes from the videos I watch.

[@eurotrash5610]

wrong friends. nothing wrong with the videos he watches. @@SubWorldOn I guess.

[@pauloalvesdesouza7911]

What's unbelievable is that a theory such as string/M theory that cannot ever be tested still gets funding and media space after decades of not producing any verifiable predictions. String/M theory is a failed proposition. Time for theoretical physics to move on.

[@AwfulnewsFM]

I am always amazed that this kind of stuff is even possible to figure out, yet another amazing piece by ScienceClic, you are probably the best physics channel currently present on KZbin.

[@Mark-Wilson]

I love the simplicity of your videos

[@GalambosOliver]

Guys I am really amazed. This and all the other videos are phenomenal and very well done. You guys are one of the best scientific channels on KZbin. Keep it up!!!

[@malcolmabram2957]

Thank you for this presentation. Physics at times is so sophisticated (I did Physics at Uni). I believe that when the 'truth' is realised, it will be so simple and easy to understand.

[@tobaidi]

Always look forward to ScienceClic videos!!! I was literally listening to an interview with Prof Brian Greene where he talked about Witton's M theory and the 11 dimensions of space!

[@TristanCleveland]

Great as always! I'd like more detail on the last point: people often mention this problem where there are too many possible geometries of the universe to figure out which one ours would be, and I've always wondered what they mean by that. Thanks!

[@jem5636]

That's a great question about geometries! A good resource for more information would be topology videos, since that's what it's coming from. I'm not certain how good I can describe the intricate parts, but the heart is that we have surprisingly simple methods to find the geometric shape of the universe... But they require calculating angles on a scale of about 1/4 of, not the visible universe, but the *universe* entirely. I don't know if we can even calculate on the scale of the visible universe, but as far as we know the visible universe might only be, say, .0000000001% of the total universe, meaning even if we could calculate, it wouldn't necessarily even be useful. At large scales, everything looks flat, kind of like how the earth looks flat... Until you look at it from the correct angle, and you realize it's a giant sphere. That's what it's like for the universe, but the only perfect angle to view from... Is outside of the universe, which means instead we need math. Lots and lots of math.

[@TristanCleveland]

@@jem5636 Thank you. I actually had in mind the issue where there are trillions of potential ways the geometry of strings could be configured in 10 dimensions to give us our universe, and we don't know which one belongs to ours.

[@jem5636]

@@TristanCleveland Ah, I don't know as much about that. I guess I'm also curious to know how people might attempt to test the string geometries. I'm guessing it might also be a problem of angles, though too small to test instead of too big to test.

[@Droopy95mkDS]

Yesterday night in french, tonight in english. You are the GOAT of science videos imo.

[@NikHem343]

Oh my god. First the GTA VI trailer and now this. I'll enjoy anything that challenges my sense of time and space.

[@user.-ks5dl]

Dude, wtf one of if not the best youtube channel for physics imho. Alessandro is the explanation god. the topics are so well structured and explained on a level for non-physicist easy to understand. rly nice animations as well. btw very good narrating. all in all great job bro's, pls keep up and sry for possible bullshit writing i am drunk and st0ned haha😅 (no worries, both legal here)

[@Leeeeooonn]

I dont understand much of this super abstract stuff but i still love watching it

[@emiilio_s]

It's a very special and rare moment, whenever I get new upload notification from you

[@livebungusreaction]

so so true

[@JPEducates]

Great video Ive been looking forward to your video on M Theory and was not disappointed. I learned several new concepts.

[@moveasid3]

one of the greatest channel on youtube. Please never stop !

[@MrShtrudL]

I enjoy your works immensely! I am now in my third year of Physics and CS degree, started watching you pre-academia

[@sammikinsderp]

You madlad, you did it! You covered M Theory! This was a good explainer. Keep up the AMAZING work!

[@opitopit2105]

This is the most comprehensive explanation of M-theory I have seen so far.

[@mushroomofthebi]

oook this is the first time from this channel that a concept of a video flew right above my head so quickly, but its understandable! it is the M-theory. i struggle to wrap my head around special relativity, this is far too complex.

[@choieunmi9303]

Check out the original string theory video, it might help with understanding. Also it's one of the greatest on the channel in my opinion.

[@mushroomofthebi]

@@choieunmi9303 i have watched every single one of his videos. this one just completely blew over my head, im sorry my puny head needs a lot more context, mathematical knowledge and time to even comprehend what is being stated here.

[@shantanuaphale3966]

Every time i get glued to seat until it finishes. In fact I wish the video keep on and on, pouring fundamental knowledge with beautiful visual description.

[@Li.Siyuan]

I have been under the impression for a long time that the two heterotic, the two Type II and Type I descriptions were 'String Theories', (really just hypotheses), and all work in 10 dimensions rather than the earlier 26-D Bosonic String 'Theory' discarded in favour of QCD, whereas M-Theory, (yet another hypothesis rather than a theory), unified the five 'String Theories' with the dualities and the addition of another dimension, making THIS the 'Superstring Theory'. It looks like I've been living a lie for the past thirty years... Excellent video, BTW - thanks.

[@youtubesucks1885]

The canon is that string theories are appxomiation of what is called M-theory like Feynmans perturbation theory is an approximation to the full nonperturbative QFT. We do not have any idea how to formulate either and it might very well be the case that both M-theory and nonpert. Yang-Mills are the same.

[@owendawson5424]

This was such a good video bro, the production was insane and you deserve so many more views and subscribers. I loved how your explanations were simple enough without disregarding too much information and you taught me so much stuff like I had no idea Hawking radiation from blackholes matched up with strings , thats so crazy, definitely convincing for string theory, this video so accurately compiled the history and is desperately needed especially now when the public is saying that string theory is dead, or I guess M theory now.

[@caruzo9631]

i‘m not educated enough to understand any of that… 10/10 would watch again!

[@feedcount]

I don't get it why aren't there more creators like ScienceClic??? Thanks Alessandro and team!!! Your are a whole other level when compared to all the other physics creators.

[@eurotrash5610]

There are other good ones. Maybe not quite up to the graphical prowess of Alessandro, but the content is just as good: eugene khutoryansky - kzbin.info/door/J0yBou72Lz9fqeMXh9mkog PBS spacetime - sometimes more ... well, funny, butyalways solid: kzbin.info/door/7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g german, boring, but very good: kzbin.info/aero/PLmDf0YliVUvGGAE-3CbIEoJM3DJHAaRzj But I love his videos, too :-) A lot.

[@feedcount]

@@eurotrash5610 Thank you!!

[@mekafinchi]

this is fascinating. I hope we get more videos on the other candidate theories

[@JorgeMartinez-xb2ks]

Thanks for this amazing video. M is the mirror image of W. Maybe because Witten, Edward. What a genious.

[@YokoOtake]

Beautifully animated and after going through many other science programs on the Internet including KZbin, so far this is the best one to teach my high-school-kids and myself as well the most recent physics on quantum level. I use your pages in my English class at our tiny private school in Sapporo, Japan. Thank you very much.

[@Storya-tq5gy]

I hardly understood anything, but the production of this video is off the charts!

[@SlashRfnR]

I love seeing this channel grow. This helped me a lot in understanding Gravity, General Relativity, Frames of reference, etc.

[@tahashah6117]

When the world needed him the most, he came back with an absolute banger

[@bobblehead7002]

I am just gonna nod and pretend I understand

[@Chrisbajs]

Succinct and elegant, eerie yet dry. I don't understand a thing. I love it!

[@DanielKRui]

I wonder why you used the "stereotypical" picture of general relativity @1:00 instead of the (more accurate) one you pioneered in one of your earliest videos.

[@jaker721]

Every video you put out is fascinating, and easy to follow. You should be proud! :D

[@HuyTran-xu2ln]

Love this channel ❤ Make more videos like this!

[@ThreadedNail]

This stuff just gets so wild, when you step back and think about it, we really still have alot to learn.

[@VitoriaUniversal]

Thanks for another great video!

[@CaseyW491]

Another great lecture that takes a subject that's light years over my head and making it possible to comprehend.

[@SolidSiren]

Does this channel have a Patreon?

[@xNillowsx]

OH MY GOD MY FAVOURITE KZbinR

[@MMD88]

Watching this in the bathroom, we gettin enlightened with this one 🔥

[@ignessrilians]

This was one of the best scientific videos I've watched for a long time! Amazing work!

[@DeveloperJake]

No way I’ve been waiting for this forever

[@alessiomasciandaro1022]

I had been waiting for this. Fantastic video as always man!

[@supercommie]

So does this mean that in M Theory particles and dimensions are the same thing?

[@christianmuller2863]

Danke!

[@kapoioBCS]

Hey thanks for making a video on string theory research! Our field (I am a PhD researcher in string theory/ mathematical physics) has become very invisible to the pop science physics channels and mainstream media the last few years and most people have no idea how fascinating is the theatrical physics research field 😊

[@kirliv8]

What you guys do is beyond my mind, and the way you end up to those conclusions is pure magic to me. But I'm happy and thrilled that some one has the patience and passion to do it, as myself don't even begin to understand where and how we can apply this knowledge to our everyday lives.

[@OnePieceFan4765]

What’s current research in string theory going into?

[@user-ze2yk7cd7g]

We'll get you those extra dimensions. Don't you worry. Experimental physics is on the way.

[@curiousuranus810]

find a new field!

[@TollsterMensch]

"theatrical physics" freudian slip there, eh. If you wonder why string theory doesn't get attention anymore maybe look to the indeed very 'theatrical' grifters selling wild, unprovable physics to the public

[@benhsu42]

Thanks!

[@steveraimee486]

The legendary Edward Witten. His high school classmates used to say when he left the room “there goes the smartest person in the world”. And they were right

[@hectooooor]

I'VE BEEN WAITING FOR THIS VIDEO SINCE I DISCOVERED YOUR CHANNEL LIKE 2-3 YEARS AGO

[@jack.p]

Fantastic video, like always! But while I admit to only having an extreme surface level knowledge of String / M theory (so my opinion is probably worth very little!), it's development has always appeared to me as an increasingly desperate attempt to just try and make something fit, to make *anything* fit. To grab gravity and QM, glue them together in any way possible and hope they stay stuck together long enough to resemble a unified theory. But more than that, while String theory is definitely abstract, it just doesn't seem "absurd" enough (to use Feynman's language) - in such a way that it seems to betray the spirit of quantum theory. When I first discovered quantum theory my mind was blown by how utterly ridiculous nature really is, and how incredible some of its implications were. In contrast, while it is certainly interesting, the more I learn about String / M theory, the more secretly hopeful I become that it's shown to be wrong, because I just have a nagging skepticism saying surely underneath everything can't be something so... sensible. Remember the briefcase from Pulp Fiction that we never got to see the glowing contents of? Imagine if you finally got to see inside and it was just an orange light bulb. Wouldn't you be a bit disappointed that it turned out to be so boring and regular and predictable? It's the only metaphor I can think of.

[@zaclovesschool2273]

I agree with alot of what you said, and am in a somewhat similar position. Though I am not really against the idea nor am I frightened that it might turn out to be underwhelming. The universe is absolutely amazing, and ancient cultures had lots of interesting ideas/teachings that align surprisingly well with some of these discoveries. I just hope they dont get too wrapped up in the particulars of something they cant fully digest, before allowing for a wider brainstorm with perspectives from other fields. Communication is what makes our species so wonderful at discovering and exploring new ideas, so I would think it reasonable to suggest a more open discussion and taking inspiration from other perspectives and lenses. What I mean by that specifically, is like how a psychologist understands the world in a particular way, viewing it through the focus of the mental and biological world of the human brain. Biology as a whole is much the same way, all these fields are reaching fontiers of knowledge and understanding...and aren't interacting enough to help solve eachother's gaps. I'm a big fan of esotericism because it encourages that very concept. Sometimes the ideas or connections turn out to be completely misunderstood, but so much more often do I see concepts meld together in ways I never even would have imagined otherwise. The world, especially the western scientific world, has an issue with rigidity, not allowing the fluid nature of the creative mind and intuitive curiosity to encourage a diversity of ideas which are accepted as possibilities. Deep down, to be honest, I find a great deal of stimulation and comfort from the ideas of the hermetics, Qaballists, Tantrik teachings, sacred geometry (wildly connected to these topics at least conceptually), etc. Not that everything is true in these viewpoints, but they often offer fascinating frameworks through which a person could view themselves, the world, and many of these fundamental laws or dimensional planes. All while encouraging a focus on introspection, afterall we ought to stay sane otherwise we can't get much done, at least in a sustainable way.

[@lLifel]

the best science channel of my life

[@sdwone]

This... Ladies and Gentlemen... Is why KZbin is the ONLY so called social media platform that I am prepared to tolerate! Channels like these feeds my very hungry brain! And you can still get to enjoy the odd cat video too! So yeah... Keep your TikTok, Instagram, Twatter... Or whatever the Hell it's called these days! Just leave KZbin alone as is! 😁

[@bobbyking2490]

This video (in addition to its fabulous content and explanations) looked stunning! Very well done!

[@haiperbus]

>string thoery it's so over

[@dabajabaza111]

Loving the channel, keep up the high quality work.

[@jaredmuirhead7615]

At this point, M and String Theory are mostly for mathematical investigation. They have never generated a single, unique testable prediction. Supersymmetry *has* been tested, and all remotely reasonable versions have been excluded by experiment.

[@hirskyiTikych]

Just wanna say, I don’t understand a thing of physics, nor do I completely understand what is happening on the screen, but I like funny words and pretty pictures. The fact that I still get at least the general idea of what is being explained is fascinating to me tbh xD

[@nakulsinghshekhawat1062]

First

[@fercardonardenete3227]

best yt channel is back!

[@miyllofromearth7143]

🫡

[@Chris-hf7pf]

Je commente pour le référencement. Scienclic english doit devenir numero 1 en vulgarisation scientifique

[@maus3454]

By far the best explaination on M theory so far on the internet

[@karimshariff7379]

A very nice description of dualities.

[@anindya3717]

you guys' are back finally! I waited so long for your video

[@beammeupscottiii]

"Newtons constant may have in fact been infinity" Hearing this blows my mind because I've recently been toying with this idea myself as a prospect that could potentially lead to some unified theory / new understanding of physics

[@stefanogandino9192]

If your universe idea has an infinite gravitational constant it is a nice universe model but not the model of this universe

[@SecretEyeSpot]

6:53 the question of which describes our universe, is missing a 9th option. That all may be true at the same time, as would any "mini-singularity" at that t=0, or unit of time.

[@VikingTeddy]

He's back! I'd given up hope. This'll have to hold us over the winter.

[@hejmeddig3103]

Wow the visualisation is soo amazing...I'm just a phyiscs enthusiast with no back ground in phyiscs or maths and yet i got soo much ❤❤..New subscriber!❤

[@Maou3]

The problem with most string theories is that they explain phenomena but make very few predictions (often none, or very trivial predictions). This makes them difficult to verify or disprove. The promise of a theory of everything, after centuries of edging, is still just a promise

[@aceyyyyyy]

edging is not a word id thought id see used when discussing quantum mechanics

[@jaymethodus3421]

Omfg the professor’s voice and enunciation😮 Dude was def the inspiration for Revenge of the Nerds

[@estebannarvaez1495]

I've been rewinding all the time because it's interesting but a bit hard to wrap my head around it 😂 Great video!

[@mphonakedi]

Been waiting for this one

[@zeeschelp]

12:59 so dualism makes us keep learning more. we are learning more deeper down on the quantum level. doesnt that work in favour of the existence of perfect doubles

[@zeeschelp]

14:06 true interaction

[@zeeschelp]

this theory goes further than other theories in trying to explain what is before reality rather than after

[@zeeschelp]

15:46 and this is significant because if there is no gravity there is no pulling which means from another perspective there is a fixed position

[@guy9360]

It amazes me how some people are able to think in such an abstract ways. It's already tremendously difficult to understand the general idea of this, let alone understanding the math. And to actually go and research this stuff and create these models and show the connections between them... I cannot even comprehend that. But nobody lays out the big picture like ScienceClic does it! You can talk about "dualities", 11-th dimensions etc ... but the way it's described here it really makes sense. It gives you a general idea what is going on in this field of research. I'm really excited to see how it will evolve and if people will be able to link it back to the physical world and verify it through experiments and observations.

[@hum6le]

been waiting for this one!

[@kayyy9835]

I was waiting for the M theory explanation for a long time , Thank you so much

[@YouthEnergy]

1:45 When that music kicks in 🤌🤌🤌

[@danielyates9055]

How did you do the animations? Love to try and create something like this for ideas I've had