M2 Bradley Destroys T-80BV With TOW Missile! Perfect Ambush

A M2 Bradley destroys a Russian T-80BV with its TOW missile in a perfect ambush.
Support the Channel
www.patreon.co...
buymeacoffee.c...

[@johnvanzo9543]

You put a smile on the face of this old TOW gunner.

[@Paludion]

Sorry, I read "missile" instead of "smile." XD

[@javir1669]

​@@Paludionx2

[@ropeburnsrussell]

Thanks for your service, I hope it's ok to say that because I mean it.

[@henrikbergman4055]

I read that in Heath Ledger's Joker voice.

[@davidjones6389]

AIRBORNE!

[@chukkie0001]

t-72 from saddams army: "first time?"

[@sirsmeal3192]

No, the last...

[@markusmeldre]

more like the t-55

[@WandererJester]

@@markusmeldre They had more than T-55s sunshine.

[@BENKYism]

@@WandererJester They mostly had Chinese Type-69-II's (T-54A variant, pretty much a T-55), only the Republican Guard and the Saladin division used "Lion of Babylon" tanks (T-72M1).

[@WandererJester]

@@BENKYism Funny how you forgot about the T-62 as well, and the Battle of 73 Easting where the M2 Bradley killed more than just a few T-72s that were there. Take your revisionism somewhere else.

[@juanpablochaconvargas6919]

Bradley doing Bradley things

[@hksp]

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@thfrussia6717]

It was destroyed few hundreds meters away the same day. Was also Bradley things I guess...

[@Pickle1762]

​@@thfrussia6717 Source: trust me bro

[@thfrussia6717]

I gave the link but crappy utube deleted it. what do you want from me else

[@juanpablochaconvargas6919]

@@thfrussia6717 then post it on any other website 😒

[@paulyoung4422]

Nice of Bradley to give the T80 a TOW.

[@hksp]

and then it got destroyed few hundred m down the road , HAHAHAHAHAHA idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@freedomfirst5557]

That should be a bumper sticker

[@davidjones6389]

It's nice to see the Bradley in its natural habitat.

[@ilaser4064]

David Attenborough voice engaged.

[@cartoonfan959]

effective pest control

[@h.a.9880]

Another eviction notice served.

[@hksp]

idiot, u forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@hanovergreen4091]

Orc-B-Gone correctly applied

[@KellyJK07]

I practiced with the TOW system...40 years ago. Pretty great that we still use it...

[@cal-native]

I was an engineer with an aerospace company that manufactured TOWs in the eighties. It is a BEAST! Even though it was wire-guided, it was very effective and accurate. The maraged steel body had so much internal stress that dropping one could cause it to explode with shrapnel going everywhere. Handled with care!😉

[@_mysilentblue2227]

In the 80's, 40 year old designs tearing up the russians current tech. Love it.

[@Bob94390]

Jamming a wire guided missile is not so easy :-)

[@SgtBeltfed]

@@Bob94390 The best thing about wire guided is there's no warning. No signals to intercept, no laser to detect. First time anyone has any idea it's on the way, is when it impacts.

[@teeanahera8949]

@@Bob94390there are also hopeless in forested country and you have to remain on target for the duration of the shot. They have switched to fire & forget now.

[@2639theboss]

@@teeanahera8949 Literally any ATGM is bad in a forest. An aircraft carrier might be pretty shit at fighting a land war in the Gobi desert but it turns out thats not what theyre intended for.

[@sirsmeal3192]

Evidence that the 47th Separate Mechanized Brigade is back in action.

[@1djbecker]

A reminder that Russia's 1st Guards Tank Army, especially its 4th Guards Tank Division, hasn't been seen in action. The 1GTA was the most famous and best equipped soviet/Russian tank unit, 'protector of Moscow'. Trolls vigorously asserted that the 1GTA hadn't been largely destroyed in the first three weeks of the invasion, and was finished off in the failed rescue of Izium/Lyman. We were told, paraphrased, that it was merely shagged out after a long squawk.

[@Khronogi]

​@@1djbecker"was the most" is that was from ww2? Are they a folk hero unit? The reason I ask is because it would be humorous to me if someone were to say they that they are the best equipped unit and also that they havnt been in combat yet because that implies russia wouldn't be sending it's supplies to those actually needing them but to what essentially would be a reserve guard force.

[@john_in_phoenix]

​@@1djbecker 1st guards tank army was severely attrited when they were surprised by the Kharkiv offensive and donated 100s of armored vehicles to Ukraine. Before that, they lost a lot of personnel (the reason they were in the "quiet" Kharkiv area).

[@d3nza482]

@@Khronogi It's a bullshit designation - like having 3 dogs, each long after the previous one has died, and calling them all... say... Cricket. Then, completely ignoring the fact one was a street mutt, one a poodle and one a chihuahua saying you had a same guard dog since 1942. Also, that chihuahua basically got wiped out by Ukrainians back in '22. The "trolls" he talks of is Ukrainian MoD’s Main Intelligence Directorate. Besides bringing receipts on the dead Russian officers, with name, rank and position to prove that, Ukrainians also took tanks - "destroyed and seized 308 units of military equipment from the said army". But have no fear - the ranks of the chihuahua tanks have been replenished by fresh fruits of green recruits. The parade army marches again.

[@mortalz9940]

47th brigade trying not to lose 8 abrams 😂

[@jamesoldham9995]

I remember when the Bradleys were first sent, all the Russophiles we're saying how it was "Only fit to fight goatherders" and whatnot. Funny how they say nothing now.

[@CyberBeep_kenshi]

As a reminder, 'reporting from Ukraine ' is under bot attack again

[@wdaswwqads]

As it should since it's fake news.

[@jody-ne7xs]

Canadian disinformation BOTS

[@janwitts2688]

Artillery makes the armour button up, restricting their perception. Nice to see Bradley doing what it was made for.

[@kameronjones7139]

Given how far the distance was I don't think the would have seen it over a mile away hiding

[@JDCheng]

​@@kameronjones7139 Might have spotted the TOW missile launch cloud or the launch flash though. Maybe not enough time to react, but still a good tactic

[@donwyoming1936]

1st time I've seen Ukraine use a TOW. The weapon is a beast on a Bradley.

[@MrCantStopTheRobot]

It would never get posted on YTube but there's footage from last November, around Avdiivka itself. TOW2B top-attacks a BMP-2 in from the right flank. Vehicle immobilized, dismounts stumble out the back, then 25mm rips apart the dismounts.

[@jacknemo8021]

Pop goes the weasel.

[@cideltacommand7169]

Pop goes the leopard

[@kevinspaceyVEVO]

@@cideltacommand7169 due to the blowout panel in the leopards, they do not in fact go 'pop.' that feature is a Russian speciality.

[@aconnagan3680]

​@cideltacommand7169 yea western equipment doesn't "pop" unlike the turrets of your precious ruzzie tanks. We design our stuff to keep service men alive. YOU design stuff to be cheap without any regard for the crew. Same with our societies. WE have an effective society and government that is inclusive, YOU have a single man screw up your country for 20+ years.

[@wunderlol]

Bradley are probably one of the best thing UA received after himars..

[@john_in_phoenix]

They've certainly been one of the most visibly effective.

[@SeanP7195]

CIA: Ahem

[@john_in_phoenix]

@@SeanP7195 Yes, I agree. Intel and satellites help a LOT. In particular the link-16 capable radars donated by a lot of European countries are less visible, but really effective when Ukraine has ammunition for counter battery and air defense.

[@jonathanpfeffer3716]

@@john_in_phoenixvery very true. the IRIS-T radar systems, the ones with missiles systems and without, have been quietly covering damn near the entire area of Ukraine without much press coverage. Absolutely vital for their air defense.

[@john_in_phoenix]

@@jonathanpfeffer3716 I was thinking about the link-16 counter-battery radars, and how valuable they are against low-level drones and cruise missiles. I know Ukraine gets early warning when bombers take off with cruise missiles, and near the front line these radars can hand off tracks to NASAMS, Patriot, IRIS-T, etc. They significantly improve the radar horizon of air defense farther back. Air defense can get firing data before their own radars can even see the target. I know multiple European countries (and the USA) donated dozens of counter-battery radars, and they really help with the intercept rate.

[@FirstDagger]

1:24 One suggestion: use yellow instead of red for unknown contacts.

[@suchomimus9921]

Good idea

[@joeordinary209]

Now feel better !

[@buddhablue21]

Hell on a wire

[@antoniograncino3506]

TOW is an archaic guidance method, but it has re-emerged valuable because its guidance can't be jammed.

[@badchefi]

Guided by wire is common with Ukrainian and Russian made ATMs. We used the old British Dragon in Switzerland back in the day. Very effective.

[@WackyJackyTracky]

It can be jammed by Shtora on T-90 since 30 years

[@TheRealSteve42]

It can be jammed by IR dazzlers, but not ECM. IR dazzlers aren’t really used anymore, so it’s not an issue.

[@TheRealSteve42]

⁠@@WackyJackyTracky Russia does not use Shtora. It was ineffective and decommissioned for the same reason the dazzlers on the Abrams were. They cover a very narrow arc, while most ATGMs are fired from an ambush position outside of this arc regardless. It also only works in perfect weather and environmental conditions, as any sort of dust will prevent it from working properly, and even then it usually won’t stop the missile from hitting its target anyway.

[@WackyJackyTracky]

@@TheRealSteve42 yea, but in the right conditions the TOW missile would go way off course. Maybe Russia will recomission a better version or soldiers will build own brew versions with 3 old T-90 dazzlers on top. Who knew we would see a come-back of turtle-tanks 😆 Anyway its wrong to say TOW couldn‘t be jammed

[@The_ZeroLine]

This is the biggest advantage of vastly superior optics.

[@ParallelOrb]

Chad Bradley Vs Virgin T-80

[@BagoPorkRinds]

Its funny that the M2 Bradley continues to destroy more tanks than the M1 Abrams. 😂

[@ThomasEPeters]

Easy when there are three or four times as many Bradleys than Abrams in the Ukranian Army. And when was the last time you saw a Challenger- England gave them twice as many as we gave M1s.

[@D64nz]

​@@ThomasEPeters clearly you can't count as England doesn't have twice as many in total. They only had 40 Challenger 2's in total and they can't even maintain that fleet. 😊

[@ThomasEPeters]

@@D64nz Your nuts because the production run was over 300.

[@tracboy80]

​@@D64nz"only had 40". You dropped a zero on that. Not a huge number by any means, but yeah not 40.

[@tracboy80]

​@@ThomasEPetersAmerica gave some 30 odd M1s (an inexplicably low number considering the thousands in storage), UK gave under half that C2s. Ideally UK govt should have bought back C1 spare parts from Oman to give to Ukraine as they would have to cannibalise parts from working tanks otherwise.

[@MROJPC]

Welcome back TOW. Oh! How we have missed you! 👍

[@rogeri2468]

Only one TOW missile can be fired at a time. That's because it's a SACLOS system - the operator has to keep the crosshairs on the target - and the wires are what carry the steering signals. It also takes over a second from firing to the missile starting moving ("first synthetic motion"). That's the time required for things like the battery squibs to fire and the gyroscopes to run up. The time between the two explosions is simply too short. I used to maintain the system on Lynx helicopters.

[@Travis_22]

REME?

[@12time12]

Aren’t the new TOW missiles laser guided? Thanks for the in depth explanation.

[@deloughi1887]

@@12time12 It's in the name, if it was laser guided, then it wouldn't be a TOW, TOW is an acronym for Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wire-guided.

[@rogeri2468]

@@Travis_22 Yep.

[@rogeri2468]

@12time12 There were a number of improvements over the years, but an advantage of wire guidance is that it can't be jammed. That isn't something that you would want to give up, given Russia's electronic warfare capabilities.

[@stevo091]

Bradley's is awesome 👍

[@hksp]

sure, it goes boom few hundred meters down the road. and this idiot, he "forgot" to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@soyyo85]

Слава Україні та її воінам...

[@alexdemoya2119]

Chadley

[@marcusott2973]

Much awaited, much appreciated excellent insights as always from you.

[@williamjones9662]

Ruzzian tank traps go BOOM!

[@hksp]

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@neiltitmus9744]

Straight down the road that looked good

[@mytube001]

I knew the TOW flies slowly for a missile, but it still looks odd. Good hit though, and that's all that matters in the end! :)

[@markshutt1476]

They are slow, by missile standards, unless it's aimed at you.

[@SuperRede4u]

​@@markshutt1476So true. 👍

[@uffa00001]

@@AmericanDiscord Ivan, you can clearly see the TOW fired at 0:09, and for a second or so you can clearly see its trajectory which is straight along the road. Review the clip. It's the other Russian vehicle which might have hit a mine. In any case, there are two Russian vehicles hit, one by a mine and the other by a TOW, and I don't see what do you rejoice about which is hit by what.

[@AmericanDiscord]

@@uffa00001 the background explosion is clearly the TOW. If you knew anything about TOW you would know that the wire often snaps leading to stray missiles. Also you can see the crater from the mine blast in the provided photo behind the tank.

[@d3nza482]

@@uffa00001 It's called coping. Famous Russian national sport.

[@henryo7778]

Great job! The advantage of the M2 lies in scouting, night vision capabilities, and the long-range attack power of the tow missile. Russian tanks have relatively poor night vision equipment, so the M2 should mainly operate at night, covering infantry attacks, rather than directly attacking enemy positions full of landmines during the day.

[@bulldog71ss33]

This is amazing footage.

[@markmierzejewski9534]

It more cost effective to send aid to Ukraine vs not. Jobs are being created because of aid to Ukraine. The cost of placating to a weak nation just because … is zero reason. Russia is failing against the poorest nation in Europe. Let’s not forget this is year 3 of the 3 day special needs operation. And struggling to secure oblasts let alone control Ukraine.

[@thefoodcan]

Wasting taxpayers money to aid a war that we should not be involved in, millions of homeless people in America and homeless veterans should be getting the aid. Ukraine could not win with other countries sending billions in supplys.

[@nikosatsaves3141]

Actually Russia is fighting against 2/3 of Ukraine the rest being the prorussian Donbas. If you put Crimea in the equation that drops even more.

[@nehalemxtv5331]

Moldova is poorest, Ukraine just next to it

[@ekahab]

It also saves US taxpayer dollars by sending the older munitions to Ukraine rather than paying workers to dismantle them, which has to happen every decade or so. Chemicals degrade over time.

[@2639theboss]

Yup. Exactly what i said when i called my congressional rep. My state alone is estimated to get around 70billion in economic growth each year from military spending. Yup. A single US state pays for the aid to Ukraine with just the jobs and economic boost from military expenditures. Every year. Anyone saying this is a bad economic play hasnt looked at the numbers and doesnt genuinely care about the economics.

[@joetuktyyuktuk8635]

You would think a well thought out ambush like this, the second explosion is likely another anti-tank weapon... maybe Stugna-P

[@suchomimus9921]

Could be, but I think stugna is more accurate.

[@Nick-bp7jf]

Good to see that TOW is still relevant. I was not sure if it could penetrate modern armour like the T80.

[@user-yo9pv1ni6t]

The Bradley, everyone loves to see this beast in action, So as i saw it, the Bradley was waiting behind some cover,,,which the ruzzian tank crew could not see. Once the T80 was near the trun in the road, the Bradley came out , stood its ground, HOPING the tank crew did not see the Brad,,, being at night, favor was w the Bradley,,,,,the Brad crew made the decision to wait til the 80 makes its turn, so aim for the turn BEFORE the T80 makes the turn,, Big chance here bc if the T80 does see the Bradley,, before making the turn, its RIP for the Bradley,,, the gamble paid off, what was great about this strike,,, the raod being staright as a arror, making aiming the TOW super duper easy. THe T80 crew just did not see the Bradley,,, The Bradley is fast, so staying behind cover waiting wasa a very smart move,,, and came out to geta clear staright shot JUST AS the T80 was ABOUT to make its turn. Bradley came to a sudden stop, waited for the perfect second,,, praying not noticed,,, ,,The Bradley is fast and this gave the slight upper hand to the Ukraineian crew. The ruzzians fear the Bradley's. Its a beast and causes panic in the ruzzian army.... ...The Bradley's stay in hiding mostly,, waiting like a Leopard stalking its prey. Incredible video here.

[@ernestpaul2484]

I do believe the Bradley's night vision and/or thermal imaging is of a longer range than the T-80's. The quality/clarity of the night sights on the Bradley are also better.

[@uffa00001]

Yes, I suppose either the Bradley had information from drones, relayed to it, or the two vehicles in the background are Ukrainian tanks, which saw the Russian tank and informed the Bradley of its direction. The Bradley then made the ambush counting on the Russian tank not realizing where it was. The Bradley certainly would have immediately escaped from its position, exploiting its great agility, if the shot had missed.

[@ironman8257]

You need to test for autism

[@john_in_phoenix]

Superior optics enables the "see first, shoot first" advantage.

[@hksp]

idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@jimeditorial]

I was one of the naysayers who said that the Bradley was overengineered, too complex and too expensive. looks like I was wrong... I am surprised at how effective it is as a combat vehicle. Crews must be confident in it, as they appear to be taking on MBT's who's armor the Bradley crews know they can't penetrate. Between the ATGM's and the Bushmaster, which appears to be capable of destroying a tanks optics and sensor suite, it may be the most effective vehicle on the battlefield today. Who knew?

[@FancyPantsOnFire]

A TOW will kill a tank bro. Not just ruin optics etc.

[@jonny2954]

Bradley overenginnered, complex and expensive? Have you seen any of the modern current gen IFVs?

[@qinarizonaful]

Thank for being honest, and posting! 🎉

[@jimeditorial]

@@jonny2954 compared to the M113? Yes

[@jimeditorial]

@@FancyPantsOnFire I mean the Bushmaster.

[@GrandmasterFU666]

USA just delivered approximately 100 Bradley's to Ukraine

[@bigearl3867]

Bad Brad is at it again!

[@hksp]

its kaput alrite idiot, he forgot to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@AstroGremlinAmerican]

Using a TOW to give a hot foot to the Orcs.

[@Canoby]

Damn, first we had Bradleys knocking out T-90 optics with their autocannons; now we're seeing them slamming T-80s with their TOW missiles. LOL maybe Russia should just get out of the tank game- obsolete IFVs are wrecking their best MBTs

[@cideltacommand7169]

No ?

[@Canoby]

@@cideltacommand7169They should. Them canceling the T-14 alongside old US IFVs knocking out their mainline tanks demonstrates that Russians don’t know how to design, develop, maintain, and use modern tanks. There isn’t a “maybe” there; I was being polite

[@Canoby]

@@cideltacommand7169 Russians canceled the one modern tank they spent over a decade trying to develop (T-14) and their deployed tanks are all getting slapped around by obsolete US IFVs in Ukraine. LOL OK I guess Russians just showing off their incompetence

[@Canoby]

@@cideltacommand7169 Russia's tanks are pathetic lol

[@PutinsFailures]

Russia’s tanks are all just modified T-72s, unless they’re even older models

[@Kenneth_James]

100 Bradleys arrived today

[@Rifterssss]

Arrived where? Florida?

[@WhyWhatWhoWhenWhyAgain]

Absolutely like this!! Great video!!

[@jameskennedy6207]

Love western tech.

[@adrianlang6550]

Excellent succinct narrative. Uou rxplained detail i had missed Thank you as usual.

[@Mwwwwwwwwe]

More like CHAD-ley😎🦾

[@captainhadd0ck]

What a beast! Slava Ukraini! 💙💛

[@philipmetcalfe4736]

certainly not towing thatT-80awa

[@patrickpeake3935]

Great, informative video as you do so regularly. Many thanks

[@flixri726]

The smoke on the right looks like it could also be defensive smoke after the vehicle saw the TOW launch

[@lifevest1]

“Yes but but, just wait until Putin unleashes the waves of T-14s! He’s just clearing out old inventory!”

[@wwlb4970]

Exactly, who needs this inventory of low-quality outdated tankmen. They are long past "best before" date.

[@JazzJaRa]

I assume it will just be one wave only because they don't have more than 20 of them and they will break down anyway.

[@d3nza482]

@@JazzJaRa They'd have to drop them from the airplane, they can't move down a Moscow street or try to mount a transport truck without breaking down. Greatest tank in the world. Galaxy, even.

[@cideltacommand7169]

​@@d3nza482Greatest tank in the whole observable universe, they have such good stealth coating their armada of 2000 of them are invisible, only 20 that are broken can be seen.

[@CrazyDutchguys]

@@d3nza482 i believe it was revealed that the tank didnt break down, but that they put on the handbrake in the tank and didnt realize it. So it wasnt mechanical issue, it was gross incompetence. Hope that helps.

[@eligebrown8998]

Nice job Bradley

[@Mcree114]

God forbid it but if WWIII started and doesn't immediately go nuclear I could see the Bradley being the Sherman of that war.

[@sequoiasemperviren3163]

Fun fact: The Bradley destroyed far more Iraqi tanks than the Abrams.

[@tonyyarbray]

don't have to shred russian rabble crap with your auto cannon all the time when you have TOWs sitting there waiting for their turn

[@AvangerCellar]

When playing the video back and forth it turns out, that one of the two points in the north eastern rear looks like an error, because it moves with the turningrate of the camera. Maybe an artefact.

[@wyrmhand]

For the almighty algorithm and 🇺🇦

[@gozzog]

B-b-b-based.

[@johncherskov5755]

Russia had more credibility before their failed war in Ukraine, because at least no one could see it happening. A T80-BV is supposed to have frontal armor to take this hit, and supposed to be already within range to hit this tank with its main cannon. It gets taken out by a 90s backup weapon from the front in 1 go. More lies from the Russian weapon industry.

[@steven-k7j7v]

Not bad

[@hksp]

HAHAHA, too bad and this idiot, he "forgot" to report the ending for tat m2. it continue driving down south turn east and then BOOM ! kaput. and theres vid of it

[@СергійСергій-и1ы]

The Bradley was designed as an effective weapon against the T-72/T-80. It has a powerful Tou-2 ATGM guidance system, this system is many times more powerful than the mobile portable version of the Tou-2 ATGM.

[@my-yt-inputs2580]

TOW not TOU.

[@rudolfthecat1176]

It has the exact same missile as the portable TOW launchers...

[@gherkamum]

🇺🇦❤🇺🇦❤🇺🇦❤👍💪👍🇬🇧

[@FhhffvFgcefhi]

The block armor is preforming nicely on the Bradley

[@DarkestAlice]

Thank you, Suchomimus, for your very interesting video! 🇺🇦 Перемоги і миру всім українцям! 🇺🇦

[@chaosopher23]

Bradley is scarier than a Russian tank! 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 Слава Україні!!! Героям слава!!! 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦

[@horuslupercal9936]

The Tow was really successful in Syria. Im surprised we havent seen more used in Ukraine.

[@kuidaorekitchen5850]

Literally zero background noise! haha. Sounds good!

[@suchomimus9921]

I was recording it at a bar in Cleethorpes. Expected the background buzz to be picked up

[@David_Crayford]

@@suchomimus9921 Interesting. A handful of people I know have gone out to Turkey for a couple of weeks, rather than fly in. One thing I first noticed was the birds tweeting in the background where you usually record. I don't know if you keep them, live next to a park, or just a large tree. It is nice to hear a bit of local colour in your videos.

[@thorwaldjohanson2526]

thank you for doing the zoomouts :)

[@RealityCheck6969]

Russia keeps loosing tanks by the hundreds and still is pushing... with tanks. This is incredible.

[@akotarakz]

They have the industrial and numerical advantage over Ukraine. This tactic wouldn't work against equal in industrial power and manpower nations/factions, hence the nuclear arsenal.

[@CyberBeep_kenshi]

for now. its teally scraping the bottom of the barrel now

[@donwyoming1936]

Russia is down to using T54/T55s. Running out of their modern tanks.

[@cideltacommand7169]

​@@donwyoming1936 How are they spearheading every front then ?

[@akotarakz]

@@donwyoming1936 Unfortunately not yet. They use the old tank models for defence, mainly in the Kherson and Kharkiv directions. They use T-72s, T-80s and T-90s in the central direction and for assaults.

[@PeanutsDadForever]

Another Amazing Video! Thank you. 🇦🇺👴🏻

[@UkraineJames2000]

I don't know who Bradley is, but he's quite the badass.

[@arabbear]

Thank you

[@FreeRojava2025]

Ahhh more Chadley action

[@The_ZeroLine]

_When Brad Met Vlad._

[@cymkriis5147]

Confirmed hit not confirmed destroyed.

[@rodneyjackson7147]

shit ya! this is what i have been waiting to see

[@andersjjensen]

Bradleys killed more Iraqi tanks, during desert storm, than Abrams did.

[@jonny2954]

*Vehicles. Abrams still destroyed more tanks.

[@jimmiller5600]

I'll bet the explosion on the left is a drone hit.

[@Vlaid65]

I suspect that it was a coordinated attack with ground troops and the other vehicle was taken out by a MANPAD - both firing on command at the same moment.

[@tonylyons7711]

Nice..🇺🇦

[@Toaster-v1z]

It was reported that more are on the way, and a more advanced version.

[@john_in_phoenix]

Latest aid package included Bradleys already in Europe and more TOWs. I think they have arrived.

[@hksp]

noice more to be turn into scrap metal

[@john_in_phoenix]

@@hksp Like all the BMPs, T-72s, and T-80s? I'd rather ride a Bradley than ANYTHING Russia has.

[@hksp]

@@john_in_phoenix whatever u wish n that area is the m1 cemetery

[@sababugs1125]

@@hksp per 1 bradley there are 50 t-72s dead

[@13699111]

Thank you for the update

[@markmonaghan2309]

Fantastic thanks again

[@Deltarious]

On paper the BMP-3 *should* be pretty comparable to the M2s Ukraine has, yes they have a bit less protection but they also have more firepower options and the armor shouldn't be hugely relevant especially for this type of engagement. However, for whatever reason, we just don't seem to see BMP-3 perform as well 'in the real world' which makes me think that the practicalities of actually operating it may be significant enough to be making a real difference, that or Ukraine's training is just much better

[@NotFound-sm9rg]

May be that the BMP-3s are not being used as much anymore compared to February 2022, due to the heavy reliance on older systems.

[@rudolfthecat1176]

BMP-3 is more like a light tank, it has great firepower with its 100mm cannon, but if you take a look at how the infantry is carried, and how they need to dismount... well, you'll notice a bit of an issue. They're probably more being used as fire-support than IFV's imo

[@carlvanlugpin9984]

To be fair the 100mm is more a less just an atgm launcher that can also fire HE rounds. It cannot fire apfsds or standard HEAT munitions ​@rudolfthecat1176

[@rudolfthecat1176]

@@carlvanlugpin9984 the 100mm gun's main purpose is to provide either direct or indirect support for infantry, the ATGM's are very much a secondary function, and unlike the standard HE shells the missiles must be manually loaded, and the BMP-3 can carry only a few missiles

[@Phapchamp]

BMP-3 is made of paper compared to Bradley. It has a good quirk of having a 100mm gun with low velocity HE shells so it can do mortar stuff. Thats about it.

[@shinn-tyanwu4155]

Great thanks 😊

[@stonefish1318]

💛🔱💙 Slava Ukraina! Heroyam Slava! ❤️☠️🖤

[@av5301]

🎯

[@sneakerset]

Hey man - nice shot (Filter).

[@pauliewalnuts240]

I dont believe you can launch 2 tow missiles that quickly so i don't think the first first explosion was a tow missile.

[@Brandon34098]

if your the one that added the text if you can border the text with a black line it would make it easier to see

[@mauriziomanservigi400]

Ottimo addestramento delle quipaggio ucraino.. Attacco da manuale

[@alientitimilk9073]

Man why bother with the Abrams the bradley’s about to win the war by itself

[@chrissmith2114]

TOW missiles never miss......

[@Amradar123]

So they finally provided TOWs 😊

[@maddantt7757]

Beautiful!

[@expeditingwithluci9188]

Dont think the before and after picture are the same vehicle. KIlled in a T intersection but the knocked-out tank is on a straight road

[@tutts999]

Brilliant post.

[@มานิดา-ม5น]

สุดยอดแบรดลี่👍👍👍

[@MrNeilcatorce]

perfect reason why USA is upgrading the Bradley to unleashed its full battlefield potential.