M2 Bradley: The armoured fighting vehicle the US is sending to Ukraine

The M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle is an armoured vehicle with firing capabilities that can destroy a main battle tank.
The US has confirmed it is sending the infantry fighting vehicles to Ukraine "in the near future" as Kyiv forces continue to fight against Russia’s invasion.
Here’s a look at the M2 Bradley and its capabilities.
More: www.forces.net...
#forcesnews #us #bradleyfightingvehicle #ukraine #ukrainewar
Subscribe to Forces News: bit.ly/1OraazC
Check out our website: forces.net
Facebook: / forcestv
Instagram: www.instagram....
Twitter: / forcesnews

[@Andyb2379]

Send as many as possible

[@paidjoofficial]

Destroyed as much as possible 😂

[@azmagaref]

Turned to kebab 😂

[@MiG-31893]

@@paidjoofficialyes the T-90!

[@dnate697]

@@MiG-31893 😁😁😁

[@volgantifriebus9549]

Send them they need them

[@MrHiram30]

Ruskies have destroyed many of them already 😮

[@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626]

They burn too well in the open field called Bradley Square. 😂

[@rsalceda]

Can't believe my old beloved 90's military micromachines tanks and planes are fighting in 2023 in Ukraine!!! I'm glad I still have them!!!

[@UsudUsud-ly9qr]

Well, they actually good in clearing mines

[@azmagaref]

@@UsudUsud-ly9qr 😂Literally

[@williammoody3644]

Known position of their artillery , Known position of the Bradley fighting vehicle and their laser range finder and the Ukraine army can use the HIMARS on the enemy position.

[@MrDK0010]

The delivery of modern western wheeled gun systems and IFVs MUST be accompanied by equal MBTs.

[@Husker5454]

I disagree . Not only are MBT's significantly harder to keep operating in the field but they are also less suited to the current weather conditions being heavy limiting their areas of operation . Smaller , light weight vehicles with anti armor capability is significantly more effective . Additionally , Ukraine are not short of MBT's or even fairly modern ones .

[@meme4one]

Yes, MBTs have shown their value in the Ukrainiane...in open warfare like the wars in Iraq, flat open areas, its tank on tank. Most accurate, longest range gun and best armour teamed with training and motivated crews win. Anything urban, wooded etc, drones and man launched anti armour weapons have decimated MBTs.

[@elektrotehnik94]

If by modern MBT’s you mean platforms that detect & effectively engage at longer ranges than the Russian MBT’s, then yes. NATO’s help to Ukraine is money-limited. (sadly… Budapest memorandum, smh). Platforms for Ukraine’s use need to be tailored to Ukraine’s immediate, but also long-term strengths & weakness. ^^ Ukraine’s army has manpower overload; it also has a money shortage, equipment quantity shortage & “new & complex platforms” maintenance training shortage.

[@springer3783]

Why if an apc can destroy a tank , why do you need tanks. Faster agile with troops carrying ability and tank destroying armament is a step ahead of a tank is it not.

[@tasman006]

@@springer3783 Read a book on armoured warfare then you will find out. Combined arms is the key to success with that you need the TANK. Simple reason firepower and support for the troops. The troops look after the tank the tank looks after the troops. Combined with artillary and air support(If you get air superiority) history has shown with good communication and planning this works.

[@olivierfaber8478]

"Could" Well our harbors and railway in the Netherlands are reporting around 1300 ifv and tanks are being used to send material to East Europe. Several Bradley's are among them.

[@FartKnight777]

Considering how these were meant to combat the Soviet’s and Russia is fighting like the soviets it makes sense. I trained on one for three years in the army looking forward to the combat footage

[@stranger6797]

So did you saw the footage 😁

[@muamaralkaddafi8765]

Full sheet your tanks, jet and soldiers.

[@typicallymoody]

They’re already being reported as very reliable and always protecting the crews. Mines only take them out of service for 3 days. The Russian AFVs explode with their whole crew dead when they hit mines

[@Stockfish1511]

They are so good russians named a place as a bradley square 🤣🤣🤣

[@azmagaref]

@@Stockfish1511 lmao Bradley Square has been the highlight of the clown offensive 😆

[@azmagaref]

Well turned out to be a nappy changer

[@volgantifriebus9549]

They are better armoured than the BTR Ukrainians are used to and they have TOW rocket pods

[@peabase]

A fairer comparison would be the BMP-3.

[@dnate697]

@@peabase No it is Not! BMP-3 is a Tin Can and where the Bradley might loose a Driver, the BMP will 50 to 80% of the crew!

[@peabase]

@@dnate697 A BTR is an APC, while the Bradley and the BMP-3 are IFVs. That's my point.

[@ColdWarWarriors]

Expect to see these things bogged in Ukraine, narrow track and overweight is going to keep them road bound.

[@elchudcampeador5642]

+1, this dude knows his things

[@azmagaref]

Good foresight.

[@tarasoglabyak2354]

Якраз те що треба щоб нищити pycню. Українці вам подякували!

[@needthecoast]

Great piece of equipment. Very capable.🎉

[@62battalion56]

1:02 R. I. P the bird

[@SuperCarShorts911]

they drop 3 green crates aswell

[@agrimensor6406]

Bradley should not use its 25mm autocannon against enemies tanks but its dual ATGM TOW missile....

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

The 25mm destroys optics, IR smoke dischargers and ERA defence.

[@jurgenmuller143]

French AMX10RC, US Bradleys and now German Marders must be a logistical nightmare. Perhaps every of this three nations should sponsor an entire division with the respective logistical package to ease the maintenance and sustainment process. Reminds me on the use and integration of foreign weapons into the Wehrmacht with different types of ammunition and spare parts.

[@hallojutuhb9071]

It's not impossible.

[@mattsmith-ri3lp]

Not to mention they all need to go to Poland or Romania for repairs, of which the Bradley in particular, needs lots

[@Joe-og6br]

The Wehrmacht weren't getting much help in repairing the foreign equipment as they couldn't get new parts. So had to cannabilse parts, so rapidly went through stock. There is a reason they used millions of horses 😮

[@jonhart7630]

@@Joe-og6br The main reason was lack of fuel. Hence the fact, Hitler prioritised capturing the Baku oilfields over everything else.

[@MarshalofFrance]

Russian T72s about to meet their nightmare...

[@shanejean5821]

LOL

[@MarshalofFrance]

@@qqqq-df4ss

[@azmagaref]

lmao 😂

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Wasn't that already their own crews.

[@illuminatra456]

You can include T90s funnily enough. All the people laughing here, where are you know?

[@paidjoofficial]

Another denial from pentagon when they knew 16 bradleys were destroyed 😊

[@lenini056]

But the crew survived. ;)

[@VOLK45422]

​@@lenini056yes some of them survive but some of them not.

[@richardbarton6146]

oh.. shut the hell up!! what do you know? over 7,000 russian tanks destroyed and counting.

[@NothernNate]

>> Bradley IFV's and French Tanks on the way to roast some Orcs! Yass 🤘 Pootin War Criminal Ukraine will Prevail! 💛💙

[@specialcookday]

Definitely an upgrade to GM Humvee. I hope Ukraine really gets this armored and change the Soviet Union invasion.

[@WanderingCanadian1]

"It has the ability to destroy a tank" Oh Russia knows

[@JohnBlessingPaligap]

They are being destroyed in Ukraine by the dozen. Poor soilders and what a waste.

[@robertluebken3151]

Well they just destroyed a T-90M, so…

[@ChobeVelyasha]

​@@robertluebken3151 Not destroyed!!But damaged! And i dont care tank can be replaced crew not,the main thing is that crew survived,unlike Bradley's which always have dead bodies near them

[@jmmelenciano4124]

Please send those to ukraine.

[@henkgroothuismink]

Hopelijk blijft het niet bij 50 stuks, 500 zou beter zijn

[@ismaildogan55518]

25 mm mühimmat, kaç mm kalınlığında çeliği delebilir. Rus bmp'leri imha edebilirmi?

[@caractacus22]

Send 500, not 50

[@thepilgrim6375]

Just wait. This is an actual combat situation, not training. Ukraine cannot afford to pull-out 500 soldiers [drivers] from the battlefield. Things must be done in a gradual manner. Remember that Ukrainian soldiers are using Soviet-era vehicles, so training is needed.

[@caractacus22]

@@thepilgrim6375 I think they can afford to train Ukrainians on all western gear. They have 750,000 men, so let’s give them MBTs apache. a10 and 500 Bradley’s. Hell we 🇬🇧 have 200 let them have those. I want to see the Ukrainians lined up like the Russians were at Kursk, the future of wester Europe is at stake….

[@georgegeorgakopoulos5956]

In Forces News we trust

[@jeanmariedominiquefall7097]

In God WE Trust .

[@rodrigogil1921]

It’s time to release them to their natural habitat

[@azmagaref]

Mine fields 😂

[@ThePhil543]

So why didn't the army buy this instead of wasting 5 billion on Ajax that doesn't work!!

[@Vatnik_tschistilka]

The states are planning to put them out of service by 2030. The compatition for the successor is supposed to be finishing this year. So getting quiet a few of them for little money, would be very much possible.

[@Joe-og6br]

It's good to have construction capability rather than just buying equipment off the shelf. That's the theory anyway. 😂

[@haziq0007]

Russian commander: Cute tanks, Ivan bring the bois and shoot those rocket and artillery.. 😂😂 slava 🇷🇺

[@lenini056]

Ukranian crews: you missed because we're alive and well unlike BMPs who kill their crews when destroyed!

[@VOLK45422]

​@@lenini056you missed because not all crew in Bradley's was survive same like BMP there is no difference at all.

[@nayfinn7113]

Bradley is Ez ti take out, All you need is 7 HV Rockets. Ezzze BRAD. M2 ON TOP

[@jg2965]

Killed more tanks than the Abrams in Dessert Storm, and the main gun can take out T72's.

[@Stockfish1511]

Lol yeah they are so good russians named a place bradley square after its glorious firework performance 🤣🤣

[@KishorTwist]

5 weeks-trained Ukrainians to face Russia... FIVE WEEKS.

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

At least they know which way to face the turret and 5 weeks is training in the Uk for infantry before they go back to Europe and do a war exercise.

[@yourdaddy5435]

🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🔥🔥🔥🤙🤙😁

[@fergus247]

apparantly this is a terrible vehicle and the US army has been trying to get rid of it now its giving them away to ukraine

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Us now has the M2 version.

[@Azrael1st]

Us has joined the war

[@thepilgrim6375]

Really? There is no fun in that! Russia will be defeated in 3 days if USA joined the war. Try harder, Russian troll!

[@MaryPippin-d9g]

Moore Karen Martinez Kimberly Rodriguez Barbara

[@ashokindian36]

All will die within February

[@Vatnik_tschistilka]

Bradleys + Marders going to Ukraine.

[@haphazardprism]

They need to much maintenance for ukraine

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Well they not traveling in far and on home turf.

[@haphazardprism]

@@BlobB-kn9ww bit late on that reply 😂

[@thenerdrobert3815]

almost 1 year past europe still negotiate supporting ukraine. i really dissapointed. i was expecting minimum 100K trained ukraine soldiers armed with western advanced fighting vehicles will be ready in few months after war is started and russia gonna surrender by Q1 2023. germany italy france spain turkey all have thousands of vehicles mostly in depos waiting to rust

[@thepilgrim6375]

You are disappointed because you are clueless! Ukraine, did not stand up against Russia when it annexed Crimea. So, do not blame western countries and NATO for having a wait and see attitude. Now, it is different. To put it simply, Ukraine now is a very good investment for NATO and western countries.

[@unlock2153]

Hehehe yeah gulf war part 2

[@watahwilly5133]

Lol lost to cavemens

[@nlomas]

Unless they send them 1000 I’m not sure the difference this will make vs a BMP2-k? It’s a massive vehicle with a high silhouette, it’s got TOW missiles which the BMP2 has a similar SACLOS via the Fagot or Konkurs. It’s cannon is only 25mm vs 30mm on the BMP. The only thing I can think of is the armour can protect against a RPG and maybe the optics will be more advanced but it depends which version is sent

[@enclavesoldier769]

The armor is a vast improvement over Russian counterparts, especially BMP-1/2. Better to think of it as a comparison between the BMP-3, which is essentially an equal minus the 100mm coaxial cannon. Protecting against 12.7mm vs 30mm is a lot of protection. The Bradley also has much more sophisticated technology compared to much of what is currently fielded on the Ukrainian battlefield. Laser range finders, stabilizers, gen 2 thermals, or even small things like a camera for the driver to significantly make the vehicle more efficient. It is a great edge for the Ukrainians, although unlikely it will be a M2A3.

[@alanaldpal950]

The deferences you note are insignificant compared to the huge upgrade in imaging/targeting that current Bradley’s have versus anything the Russkies have

[@dougcoombes8497]

Kind of depends which model the US sends. M2 ODS with laser range finder will make an excellent observer for Ukrainian artillery. The 25mm Bushmaster is more than effective against light armor and troop positions and the TOW can take down MBTs. This is will be a valuable addition to the AFU.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@alanaldpal950 I mean, the average Russian tanks uses Sosna-U thermals, which are as good, if not better than whatever the Bradley has. This of course is not factoring in that the biggest killer of vehicles is drone assisted artillery fire.

[@Jovy198]

1980 made... 😆😆😆😆😆

[@author7027]

are you native American?

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Compared to what the T-90 is an upgraded 1970s tank.

[@alfacentauro7773]

🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷🇦🇷💪💪💪

[@nathanruben3372]

After receving this, french tanks, I believe ukranie will attack and try to breakthrough in doneskt...

[@shanejean5821]

The french wheel barrows..

[@tellyboy17]

Isn't this the death trap that was tested with its fuel tanks filled with water to pass some survivability test?

[@Melonist]

Such a test is helpful because it allows one to see where the tanks were penetrated and hence where to place better armour.

[@tasman006]

Pentagon wars the movie aside its problems have been improved and its combat record is good. It killed more Iraqi tanks than Abrams during the 1st Gulf war. IED's though and mines is a worry some have been destroyed and during the tank battle of 73 easting one was destroyed by a BMP 1 IFV. Overall this vechile would be a better choice than sending more M113s for being able to at least give troops on the ground not only a taxi ride but better support on the ground with its superior firepower.

[@tellyboy17]

@@3strikesyouout643 The total lack of advancement of Russia says it all: it is the Russians and their crappy equipment that are getting obliterated in Ukraine. Doesn't mean all Western equipment is great and Bradley may be a bit of a dud.

[@tellyboy17]

@@3strikesyouout643 You sound confused, Russia is losing this war big time and the only reason they are still in Ukraine at all is because so far the West isn't sending the tanks and planes that will definitively seal the fate of Russia's army of hapless clowns.

[@voidtempering8700]

@@tellyboy17 I mean, the tanks in Iraq aren't comparable to the tanks Russia is using right now. Even a T-62m has better armor than the T-72Ms they have to Iraq.

[@SharpCats371]

Merry Christmas 🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🥁🎄🕊✝🙏 Maybe Western Civilization should concentrate on Their boundaries and borders, restoring society and world to a reasonable normalcy especially centered on God and Jesus Christ.

[@BlyatimirPootin]

Nah

[@andreasbimba6519]

Yes Bradley’s are great but the likely numbers provided is way too small and it would be even better to send 4000+ M113’s from the US inventory but fitted with new turrets with stabilised guns such as the Rafael Samson Mk2 which also has a Spike launcher plus upgrade the armour with lightweight composite armour and possibly some reactive armour and spall liners, shock resistant seating and so on similar to the Australian M113AS4.

[@wigrammartialarts]

Ukraine already have 1500 m113s.There are thousands of bradley's in storage, this is just the beginning, there will be more.

[@andreasbimba6519]

@@wigrammartialarts Wow that many, lets make it 4000 M113's then and as many Bradleys and Marders as they can get.

[@Vatnik_tschistilka]

It's just the first few the west is gonna send to see the performance and to not scare the Russians to much. The Russians need to mobilize more badly trained cannonfodder first, so they need to have the feeling that they can still win, before we bring up the bigger numbers and shred all this mobilized meat. For a lasting peace, lessons need to be given from some while others need to learn them on their skin. So that is imo the reason we aren't opening the floodgates yet.

[@wigrammartialarts]

@@andreasbimba6519 There are 4000 Bradleys is storage and around 700 Marders. This won't leave the USA without war reserves as the Bradley was made to fight in Europe. Any war with russia would be an absolute domination from what we can see now. Bradley's and other heavy vehicles are useless in the South China Sea which is the only other scenario war reserves are important. Its actually a big reason the Marines no longer use Abrams. May as well send them to ukraine.. They are still fighting Russia as designed... just with Ukrainians manning the equipment.

[@andreasbimba6519]

@@wigrammartialarts Yes Bradleys would be ideal but I just can't see the US government providing enough of them. The M113 being so old but still functional would be politically easier to provide.

[@calebbearup4282]

At NTC we mostly trained to engage with the T72 with the Scout Bradley's. When we were ambushing them for the most part we had a 7 kills to 1 loss ratio on average. However whenever we got ambushed those numbers didn't look nearly as good lol

[@wcm8909]

At NTC I was mostly crammed into the back of one with seven other sweaty dudes for nine hours at a time, with no earthly clue what was going on outside

[@gr6373]

@@wcm8909 Me too. Wobbling around for a couple minutes after dismount🤣

[@AdamD19D]

@@gr6373 So glad I was a HMMWV guy. Our truck had just under 60 kills sneaking around calling in firemissions and rotary with the LRASS. Opfor don't get to use those so it's really not fair.

[@calebbearup4282]

Sounds like y'all got to do NTC in an infantry Bradley. We went with just the driver gunner and commander. Occasionally we would go out with just two. So I definitely got to be much more involved.

[@roceye]

@@wcm8909 Do we know which version they are sending- specifically do they have Laser range finders and GPS?

[@snowsnow4231]

😂😂😂😂🎉🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

[@SmokeDog1871]

US Army is looking to replace this ifv, have almost 7000 of them so it makes sense to give them to Ukraine. Hope its just the first part of a broader effort to fully modernize their military with western afv and aircraft

[@Viktor_Palamarchuk]

The same bro! We already waiting for the next part in close future! :-) USA on the side of truth and freedoms! Appreciate for that!

[@Dushmann_]

@@Viktor_Palamarchuk I hope you and your family are safe and well Ukraine will win this war eventually. It's just a shame that Ukrainians have to suffer in the mean time. The US, UK and Canada all have Ukraines back and will provide as much money and equipment to ensure Ukraine wins. You don't have to worry about receiving future shipments of equipment, they definitely won't stop. I think it's only a matter of time before the US and UK start sending Abrams and Challenger tanks. These new IFV shipments have opened a door that allows the discussion of sending tanks to Ukraine.

[@badluck5647]

Ukraine had a success offensive with a fleet of Toyotas. Imagine what they can do with a fleet of these.

[@David-nu6kw]

Big thanks to the United States for sending THE Bradley. I hope they send at least 1000.

[@DroneStrike1776]

NGCV will have the XM913 50mm cannon. Bradley still effective as hell for urban combat. Optics, 40+mph, maneuverability, 3500m 25mm Bushmaster. And it can stop 30mm rounds, aka Terminator.

[@MrLense]

So many people especially in the media are calling these and the French AMX 10s as "Tanks" when they clearly are not.

[@damianm-nordhorn116]

Go ahead and define "tank". Challenger, M1, Leopard etc. are MBTs. They are what you (personally) consider "a tank", while, in fact, they are certain types of tanks. In German IFVs are Schützenpanzer, which translated literally means something like infantry tank or squad tank, with "Schütze" meaning infantryman. .. and you probably know what's a Panzer, right?

[@TrueChell]

@@damianm-nordhorn116 Calling everything that's armored a "tank" will needlessly bolster regular people's image of what's being supplied to Ukraine. Where I am, I hear people call every manner of thing (including ac/mraps) a "tank", and what they mean is MBTs. Though they don't understand the difference with anything. Convenient?

[@studentaviator3756]

I think some of it is political posturing to make it seem less of a scary jump to when they actually send mbt. People either downplay a system or play up a system for political purposes in this case m2 Bradley "tanks" and amx10 wheeled "tanks" are being sent so why not send leopard 2 tanks.

[@tasman006]

I've been studying tanks and armoured vechiles for over 40 years. There has been a great evolution in armour since its inception in WW1. The tank itself evolved from three types. Light, Meduim and Heavy tank and basically became all three as the MBT after WW2 with most countries. Even though light tanks are still around basically a tank due is a tracked armoured vechile with a turret a main gun with coax machine gun. (A armoured vechile with wheels I classify as an armoured car some people will say its a tank with wheels.) For infantry it started of on horse then the truck then a armoured half track which then evolved into a tracked APC or armoured perssonel carrier which generally just had a machine gun like the M113 and carried infantry. This then evolved into the Infantry fighting vechile or IFV which has better firepower generally a 20mm, 25mm, 30mm, 35mm and 40mm auto cannon. Some have for example a standard gun like the Russian BMP 1 which is 73mm low pressure gun and most not all will have a ATGM or Anti Tank Guided Missile, coax machine gun and of course carries the infantry. (Agian there is also wheeled versions of APC's and IFV's.) Other vechiles like tanks where tank destroyers or support vechiles that didn't have a turret or where open topped with a turret. This practice didn't last long and any tank destroyers morphed into a tracked vechile without a gun and had ATGM system but in most armies today this kind of vechile is not really used anymore accept in Russia. For artilary a SPG or self propelled gun also has gone through an evolutionary process to make artilary more mobile generally they will have a turret put on top of a tracked Chasis of a tank or other vechile mounting generally a 105mm, 122mm, 152mm, 155mm, 175mm, 203mm gun. There is also engineering vechiles on tracked Chasis of MBT's. The Media don't have this knowledge and just print what they think it is without the common sence of using Google.

[@damianm-nordhorn116]

@@TrueChell Did you boys ever consider where the term "tank" was first used, for what sort of vehicle? No, not for an MBT with a big main gun like the Tiger.. Vehicles such as the Mark IV (the original "tank") and the A7V were basically infantry fighting vehicles, with machine guns and HE spitting guns. MBTs are called MBTs a reason. Otherwise one would ONLY call them "tanks", not "main battle tanks". So OBVIOUSLY they're specifically called MBTs BECAUSE there are other vehicles one can call "a tank".

[@tjpld]

Send it!

[@iamsorryforbeingrudebefore1626]

Google "Bradley Square in Ukraine"😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@laxmihari100]

This is a dud tank

[@thomasbernecky2078]

one minute 50 seconds? sigh, disliked and back to Perun

[@eannamcnamara9338]

Ah I can't wait to see Bradleys finally doing their designed job, pushing back a Russian offensive

[@mattsmith-ri3lp]

Far from it. Not designed as a defensive weapon. Poor armour for that purpose

[@Stockfish1511]

Lmao.

[@jasondreezing1129]

16 bradley destroyed in 2 days

[@FuckTheState]

This comment aged like fine milk

[@eannamcnamara9338]

@@FuckTheState They seem to be doing their job just fine. yeah some are being lost but that's war.

[@windsnexus9064]

Send them everything they need and then some.

[@plurplursen7172]

This machine alone, is designed to counter the Russian BNP and Tanks.. I bet it will smash through Soviet tech like it was a modern tank!

[@peabase]

If they're used offensively against Russia's main battle tanks, it's the latter's tank rounds that will be smashing through the Bradleys.

[@Joe-og6br]

Bradley crews would want to avoid tanks at all costs. 😮

[@azmagaref]

Yeah we saw how they smashed through and blew up 😂

[@rickjames18]

What makes the M3 Bradley dangerous is the optics combined with the firepower. The Ukrainians will be able to take out T-72s from out of reach. Depending on how many M2/M3s they get it could make a big difference.

[@roceye]

Laser range finder and GPS will allow them to designate artillery targets.

[@peabase]

From out of reach? Depends on which ammo the T-72s are carrying. If they're carrying barrel-launched ATGMs, the Bradleys are in trouble. Some types outrange the TOW.

[@rickjames18]

@@peabase The missiles or Atgms may be able to reach but we have not seen the Russians using them in Ukraine. They have also been using older T-72s with older optics lately which are not better than the Bradley’s. Maybe the T-90s but I’ll leave that to the tank experts.

[@azmagaref]

It's very dangerous to its crew yeah😂

[@KingOstrich]

50 bradleys are now confirmed as far as I know. think thats a bit of a gamechanger.

[@azmagaref]

And as of today 47 confirmed destroyed 😁

[@KingOstrich]

@@azmagaref source: trust me

[@sharjinalaviantik9688]

This didn't age well. lol

[@clacicle]

Speaking of comments that haven’t aged well…😅

[@LordDirus007]

....... What are you talking about? Seriously what are you trying to say? Because every single thing I seen. Says the Bradley is turning Tanks into swiss cheese

[@BugLoverVR]

No fr this machine is an absolute unit.

[@HocusPocus-db2jd]

Damn this comment didn't age very well 😂😂. M2 bradly destroyed Russian tank more advanced then the M2 Bradley 😂😂. I love people like you we need more people like you in this world 😂😂😂.

[@sharjinalaviantik9688]

@@HocusPocus-db2jd lol what didn't age well? russia literally has a museum filled with captured bradly's. also lets not forget about the graveyard of bradly's at the beginning of counter offensive. 😂😂😂

[@jasonharryphotog]

Full send

[@DavidLewis-g3e]

Smith Kenneth Taylor Patricia Hall Susan

[@terminatorvzla3290]

👍🇺🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧✊

[@SpencerCokely]

We’ve got plenty. They’ll be put to good use in Ukraine, and much more valuable there than in our storage facilities awaiting retirement. Good opportunity to cycle through some inventory for a good cause.

[@someonesvagabond]

Hey, so, how are the Bradleys doing?

[@yourdaddy5435]

"They're just troop carriers!"

[@elchudcampeador5642]

one piece is here, one piece is there

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

@@yourdaddy5435 IFV

[@illuminatra456]

Embarrassing a Russian MBT.

[@chrismitchell4622]

Great news with the Polish Leopards and German Marders Ukraine can drive Russia out of Crimea

[@gaius_enceladus]

Yes! Bradleys for Ukraine! Slava Ukraini!

[@peabase]

Leopard 2s for Ukraine and I'll join in.

[@FuckTheState]

Aged like fine milk

[@ashernikora5942]

Ukraine will need armored vehicles to repel the Russian campaign in the coming spring/summer

[@andreasbimba6519]

Good point but there will be offensives undertaken by both sides during the Winter as well once the ground freezes which is taking longer than average due to the current relatively warm weather.

[@Deeleo-c7o]

A POJ! See pentagon wars on their dv.!

[@chrisbreezy-ryanbarbosa4320]

US has many of these i dont see why they cant just ship half of em over to Ukraine right now and replace those lost with newer model

[@thepilgrim6375]

I do not understand why you, Americans, cannot think beyond your asses. This is an actual combat situation. Training time is limited, and you cannot pull out hundreds of soldiers from the frontline and do the training. Ukrainians are using Soviet-era vehicles -- training is needed to make Bradley operational in the battlefield. Think first before making a comment.

[@SurprisedDodoBird-gy8en]

Ace in the hole

[@malcolmmartin5167]

What happened most of them are lost . Either Russia got them or ZELENSKY sold them

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Got proof?

[@dan9002]

Ukraine has 200 Bradley's, 200 M113 APC's and 30 Abrams. This is nowhere near what is needed for an attacking Army. A battle maybe? Leave it to a Democrat career politician to make half measures when a war is on.

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Vs a museum and modern tanks made with a mix of metal and plastic layers.

[@markjmaxwell9819]

I hope they send plenty of them and lose plenty. It might spur the USA on to getting something much more state of the art.

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Like what?

[@thrawn222]

Lancet FTW

[@dnate697]

Cheering for @$$clown Dictators are we?

[@SurprisedDodoBird-gy8en]

It's huge

[@SurprisedDodoBird-gy8en]

So fast

[@Andrew_Alxf]

😂😂😂

[@s1nb4d59]

Would have liked to have watched a longer more in depth video than this.

[@michaelgautreaux3168]

That makes no sense! 1st of all, they build what Russians are using. They use the same thing. They're repairing what they capture.

[@thepilgrim6375]

Another clueless American !

[@author7027]

Michael Gautreaux Michael Gautreaux =and what Russians are using?

[@jamesbohlman4297]

Santa has made his choices clear for IFVs to Ukraine; now a decision has to be made on choosing a tank. And no, it cannot be more T-72s.

[@randomname1251]

Why can’t it be more T-72’s? It takes about 2 years to become fully proficient on a German Leopard 2, the same for the Abrams. The Ukrainians already know how to use the T-72. Plus, anything captured by Russia gets examined by China. Why should we let our equipment possibly be captured? It’s not really our war.

[@jamesbohlman4297]

@@randomname1251 because when the mud puddles dry up in the spring, the hammer will fall on those verminous Russian offenders. The Red army has never faced allied air power, nor can their ground forces deal with modern, solid state fire control systems. This needs to end; Ukraine has six months to learn how to speak NATO as a second language.

[@peabase]

@@randomname1251 The Dutch trained conscripts to such a level of proficiency that they beat NATO regulars with their Leo 2s in annual tank contests. Moreover, Ukraine's tankers just need conversion training. They're not new to tank warfare, like the Dutch conscripts were when their training started.

[@MostDopeGamer775]

50 have recently been approved. -Reuters

[@hobartw9770]

I thought they had rubber tars back in desert shield.

[@MCSonixx]

Awesome ⚘️

[@bradleyb5558]

sir my name is Bradley

[@ChristianGustafson]

These will make good tomato pots, for container gardening. 🇷🇺

[@author7027]

you Russian, what dont you like here?

[@ChristianGustafson]

@@author7027 You don’t have to be Russian to see that NATO is the aggressor.

[@author7027]

@@ChristianGustafson ok, tell me how?

[@ChristianGustafson]

@@author7027 Well, you just blow the tops off them and fill the space with topsoil. Don’t forget to prune the suckers.

[@denexfef2762]

В украине уток много

[@williammoody3644]

To find the position of the enemies. Use the known position of the Ukraine their known position the known position of the Bradley fighting vehicle and its laser range finder and you have their GPS location. Triangulation!

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

?

[@arkkrogue3870]

Time me mooooooour!!!!

[@NeverSickAtSea]

What is the second black “fuzzy ball” moving horizontally right to left at 1:02?

[@letcherross6747]

Another Bradley's TOW missile?

[@hbombharry]

Get them the warriors out there full chubham armour upgraded

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Warriors front armour is not that great and it has no AT missiles.

[@barnold62]

Won't these still need air support??

[@mattsmith-ri3lp]

Yes, and armoured support. Ukraine has neither in suitable numbers

[@BlobB-kn9ww]

Russian Air force has to fly too high to engage the ground due to the amount of russians launched out of tank hatches upto 20,000 feet.

[@MyEgoReal]

These brads man they’re a piece of junk I’m glad we getting rid of them

[@johnbooth5297]

They should find a way to upgrade these with Javelin's or another fire and forget system instead of Tows

[@46FreddieMercury91]

I guess the Ukrainians will carry javelins or NLAWS on board. Job done

[@ThatCarGuy]

TOWs can't be jammed, which is their pro.

[@myndzi8125]

Always thought the nickname "iron coffin" was concerning..

[@paintballusa1658]

Good 👍 Send them to Ukraine ✊🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦👍