M2 Bradley vs BMP-3

M2 Bradley vs BMP-3 #shorts #shortsvideo #short

[@yaboyed5779]

Bradley for its Defense, BMP 3 for it armaments.

[@willthorson4543]

Armament isn't everything. In fact because of so many different weapon systems and the ammunition it carries, the bmp3 is very uncomfortable to be in for both crew and infantry. The engine is in the floor of the infantry compartment which makes getting into and out of the vehicle awful. The weapon systems on the bradley are not only far more reliable but far more accurate

[@CRISPY0317]

What do you base this thought of on inacuracy and uncomfortable crew on?​@willthorson4543

[@CRISPY0317]

​@willthorson4543, what do you base these thoughts on? Where is your evidence? Why do you believe this?

[@urossaric5435]

both are very good, but in my opinion the Russian BMP-3 is better

[@Anomaly26_]

Well the BMP 3 is faster than the Bradley. But I would rather be in a bradley than a bmp 3, the protection is just way better.

[@Moralez1016]

X fking D BWP 3 is much weaker vehical then Bradley. The only advanteges BWP3 is... Light weight and mobility. But to be honest. In field you dont driving 70km/h. Better fire control systems in bradley, anti-tank missiles and armor, makes USA IFV much, much better Edit: BWP3 is driving VIBIED Absolute TOP in world at "self desintegration"... 😂

[@masterdebater8298]

​@@Anomaly26_the bmp is literally better armoured

[@Anomaly26_]

@@masterdebater8298 tell that to the dead bmp crews. The disabled bradleys in ukraine were clearly empty with every crew hatch open. Clearly showing that NATO IFV's are better protected. Theyre supposed to protect the crew. A machine is just a machine. But an experienced crew is 10× more valuable

[@masterdebater8298]

@@Anomaly26_ the bmp isn't indestructible it has a better armour you can even see footage of Bradley's getting destroyed but no point in arguing because its not about the vehicle its about the crew

[@jermainegray5502]

Not going to lie both are great machines

[@Moses_VII]

I like BMP for its amphibious capabilities.

[@log1dd]

Probably the Bradley. Night vision, an autocannon that managed to disable a T-90M 2 TOW's and amazing survivability.

[@user-tz9ui3zy1e]

тоесть 100мм и 30м орудия не навредит т90м, иди прими таблетки клоун...

[@_luis_514]

25mm didnt even damage inside of the tank, whole crew survived and it didnt disable the T90M, it was a drone. Ignorant

[@log1dd]

@@_luis_514 it did disable the tank. No optics = disabled as they cant see and did you not see the turret spin out of control? The drone DESTROYED it not DISABLED it.

[@el52]

If I remember correctly, there was one instance where a M2 Bradley (ODS variant) was able to still run, despite receiving a hit from a T72 shell (armor piercing I presume). Unless the BMP3 got a significant upgrade in armor, optics and gunnery equipment (among other ergonomics), even the ODS Bradleys should be enough (if not more) to win in a straight up fight. The optics on their own (including the gunsight and vision modes i.e. thermals/night vision) are, at the very least, serviceable, if not still competitive and competent given the age of such equipment. During Desert Storm, the Bradley took down so many Soviet made IFVs (including BMP-1s and 2s), aside from Main Battle Tanks (T72s, for example, plus medium tanks like T62 and 54/55 models). TOW launchers (max range: ~5 km) for heavy armor, Bushmaster 25mm chain gun for light vehicles, and M240 machine guns vs infantry. The BMPs during Desert Storm have light armor, so the 25 mm autocannon took down several of them. The M2 Bradley earned its reputation through its feats, and has been pretty much proven and tested. BMP-3 can prove itself whether it is truly a formidable weapon.

[@zweboi1094]

@@log1ddthe bmp 3 would be able to do the same lmao

[@lah-xm6yt]

bmp 3 more powerfull

[@savvasavva2635]

In cannon in other not

[@kalajari1749]

​@@savvasavva2635In everything. Weapons, armor, speed, mobility

[@johaneslerius9074]

I choose Russian IFV BMP-3

[@user-wd1sl9bf2c]

Hahah no

[@j.t.elzner2101]

​@@user-wd1sl9bf2cbradley is Big piece of sh*t. Weak elektricity Low firepower Big and bad maneveribility Bmp-3 has better firepower Is faster Can swim But has low crew protection.

[@faiqanjum9010]

bro what the freak is up with your profile picture

[@kalajari1749]

​@@user-wd1sl9bf2cHaha yes. Cope

[@skaweimc]

In terms of weaponry BMP-3, in terms of defense Bradley.

[@omskpravo55]

учи матчасть

[@charlieyes4946]

The newer versions of the Bradley would kick any Russian ifv's ass, even the old ones are on par or at least slightly better than the best of the best that russia had to offer

[@skaweimc]

@@charlieyes4946 i disagree, you have no proof of that, all nato equipment in ukraine was destroyed, there is reason why zelensky wastes 100m a day fighting russia

[@Simon_Nzioki]

You guys must be jocking, right? Because Bradley can be penetrated with a 50 caliber machine gun while BMP-3 has a frontal protection against Bradley's 30 mm autocannon, closest competition for Bradley is the BMP-2.

[@charlieyes4946]

@@Simon_Nzioki LMAOOOOO

[@theEWDSDS]

BMP is awful, the only reason it's used is because it's a cheap fast box with a gun.

[@quan-uo5ws]

How is it awful. Explain.

[@theEWDSDS]

@@quan-uo5ws the thing has crew survivability of a dumpster. If you are a BMP crew member, and you get hit, you *are* dying.

[@quan-uo5ws]

@@theEWDSDS How is the Bradley better in that regard? they are both IFVs, they are have thin armor by design.

[@theEWDSDS]

@@quan-uo5ws the Bradley has much better crew survivability. This is due to American doctrine of man before machine. meanwhile Russian doctrine is "if they are going to die, might as well try and kill as much as possible" which is why tanks like the T-#2 and the BMPs have a offense focused design... this means that survivability is an afterthought. Features like the carousel loader on T-#2s are perhaps *slightly* faster than manual loaders, but they force the crew to sit right next to live ammo... so if the tank gets hit, then the gunner- along with the whole turret- becomes a member of Roscosmos.

[@gnas1897]

​@@theEWDSDS it's not "if the tank gets hit". It's if the carousel or stored ammunition gets hit and hitting the carousel is actually an incredibly challenging task.

[@ofm_vzla6718]

Two beautiful and dangerous vehicles in my opinion ❤

[@deusduran4901]

The bmp3’s poor ammunition and fuel safety negates any of its on paper advantages by being able to turn what would otherwise be over penetrations or dents into catastrophic detonations of all the 100mm, 30mm, and fuel inside the vehicle. This is an issue that plagues most Soviet and post soviet designs in one capacity or another.

[@user-jv5lv2lr7x]

Примерно одинаковы,но Бредли более заметна,за счёт своих габаритов.

[@mikitheslav9711]

the bmp3 isnt bad but its crammed full of ammo and only the bmp 3M variant has thermals, the bradley has thermals for the commander and gunner

[@user-ek9sv1km3k]

Не... Бредли по моему лучше. (Почему русские считают Что лучше Бредли с американцы считают что БМП-3 лучше?) У БМП-3 есть хорошее прозвище которое показывает что это не лучший бронетранспортер. Б - Братская М - Могила П - Пехоты 3 У БМП - 3 не самая лучшая броня. Её может пробить противотанковое ружье 1941 года. По остальным параметрам он не худший, но и лучшим его не назвать.

[@savvasavva2635]

Да вот нормальный чел хорошо все разобрал Сигма просто.

[@user-yc6mx4kq8l]

Херню не пиши.

[@VIGRID8D8.]

БМП на то и БМП что в них нет брони

[@savvasavva2635]

@@VIGRID8D8. Между прочем главная цель БМП сохранить жизнь экипажу при попадании 🤓

[@VIGRID8D8.]

@@savvasavva2635 главная цель для которой создавалась БМП это довести пехоту, и прекрыть еë огнём Сейчас даже ни один танк не может обеспечить безопасность при попадании

[@ryanmichael74]

BMP has terrible side protection I would rather be in a Bradley with better armor and a more advanced weapon system with better Thermal and NVG capabilities imo

[@UnkownMan19]

The bmp manul solos bradley imo. But maybe some bmp from 1987 would lose against modernized bradley, but the bmp modern versions are as good as if not better due to them being cheaper, faster, more well protected, bigger firepower, amphibious capabilities without preparing, better movement in rough terrain, the upgraded versions got tick side armor, and nvg, and thermal sides, some even radars

[@quan-uo5ws]

Your armor can only save you from a 20mm autocannon at best. I wouldnt really rely on it. (its an IFV after all, they are not supposed to have very thick armor)

[@sgt_malice4521]

The issue is bmp-3 needs armor and rockets

[@zweboi1094]

Bmp has rockets?

[@tevandorkin7402]

It fires anti armor missiles from the 100mm self loading canon

[@AthgibWasHere]

Bmp 3 has era version, It has atgm with cannon, having auto cannon

[@battlefront1222]

BMP-3

[@Staann]

N*zi

[@billny5575]

@@Staann woah, some ones a nazi

[@ohhkennny766]

Bradley has better technology and survivability Bmp-2 is cooler because of the high rate of fire but is a glass cannon

[@phonyugen-kr3pg]

war thunder graphics are getting crazy

[@ilyailya646]

M2 Bradley off course !)

[@danielrumstajn5659]

Bradley of course 🇺🇲💪🏻

[@Omnidex8.0]

Both from 🇩🇴 🇺🇸

[@joniharon511]

Бмп 3 конечно хороша, но я не понимаю, почему на неё не посадили орудие от бмп-2м. Большая скорострельность и хорошие боеприпасы.

[@savvasavva2635]

Так у Бредли вообще разрывные снаряды + ПТРК ракеты И так же Бредли полностью запрограммирован (снаряды взрываются в определенных моментах) так же хорошая защищённость и перевозка экипажа и высокая выживаемость экипажа,поэтому ты не прав.

[@nguyenphuoc4834]

I would prefer BMP-3 BMP-3 is able to transport an infantry squad, amphibious, heavy armament with main gun is 30mm auto cannon and secondary gun is 100mm cannon

[@Anomaly26_]

Cramped space for full geared infantry. And having 2 guns in the same vehicle is just going to give gunners a fucking headache

[@nguyenphuoc4834]

@@Anomaly26_ having 2 guns like that is an advantage, as 30mm auto cannon and 100mm cannon fill each other’s disadvantage, gunner just have to learn to use them swiftly. It’s not the gun making them headache, it’s the soldier who isn’t understand their weapon

[@mycookie011]

Where can i throw 2-3mil at to buy either one? 😊

[@USER___2024]

Короче российский БМП лучше вооружением, а американский бронированием

[@aleksahgr6238]

Как знать но танк в одиночку он уничтожил.

[@tevandorkin7402]

Bmp3 for it's versatility and armorment

[@rustyheyman214]

Bradley will destroy the BMP before the BMP knows it is there. TOW plus optics it is not a fair fight

[@kuunoooo7293]

................ well no, the bmp3 has a thermal sigth. It would be a fair figth

[@West_Coast_Gang]

@@kuunoooo7293not with a tow missile

[@kuunoooo7293]

@@West_Coast_Gang russian bmp3 has 9m117m1

[@nguyenphuoc4834]

BMP-3 already have AT missile to be honest

[@Anomaly26_]

Well you dont know that. The BMP3 could come from anywhere that isnt directly in front of the bradleys thermal optics but tows and a 25mm is just perfect for ifv work

[@DGEM-bf6hc]

BMP-3M

[@user-qo7xd2su1i]

BMP-3❤

[@thickshmeat948]

Bradley vs bmp3 is not really a good matchup because the bmp is more of a light artillery/ fighting vehicle while the bradley is just an ifv. two different purposes Better matchup would be bmp 2 vs bradley

[@West_Coast_Gang]

The BMP-3 is a oven, the bradley has APS, ERA, and the BGM-71

[@Russian_Dogg]

Bmp-3 has 100mm cannon bmp-3 also has 9m117m1 and you can add era to it but in my opinion it’s ugly with era

[@YuRaihn]

​@@Russian_Dogg, ERA does nach work correctly with BMP-3's anti-bullet armor.

[@sebulbableves]

​@@Russian_DoggChonky bmp, why would smb. even add era on an ifv, it won t do much anyways

[@ketchupandmustard3846]

Since when did the bradley get an active protection system?

[@charlieyes4946]

@@ketchupandmustard3846during our time in the Middle East. It wasn't completely pointless I suppose.

[@divinesan7786]

I wish the Bradley wasn’t tall like that

[@menelao56]

Usa vs Russia....

[@user-oy7pf2he7s]

РУССКАЯ БМП 3

[@beerusqlfqlf6363]

BMP 3

[@prodget0]

Бмд4

[@hussamraheem2333]

Bmp3

[@Leoleo-iy4od]

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💪💪💪💪💪🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱🇵🇱

[@Vympel662.]

Смертоносная и мощная БМП-3 ВДВ российского производства благодаря своим превосходным характеристикам, непревзойденной огневой мощи, уникальной защите делает ее единственной в своем роде машиной.🇷🇺

[@omskpravo55]

металлолом

[@user-lh4te2ro1j]

Bradley yes😅😂

[@charlieyes4946]

@@user-lh4te2ro1jthe BMP-3's armor can't even withstand artillery fragments 🧱 Even the older Bradley's are at least just as good, and at most slightly better.

[@hizbee5524]

I'd chose "Lancet" over this junk Bradley

[@cristhianff1015]

I'd chose "Javelin" over this junk BMP3

[@savvasavva2635]

I'd chose "Stinger" it will make lancet like a joke

[@eduardohing7237]

Low profile...

[@lilMungo]

Low profile and low survival rates

[@kuunoooo7293]

​@@lilMungo every vehicle in ukraine has low survival rates

[@West_Coast_Gang]

@@kuunoooo7293russia and ukraine both use the same vehicles, all cheap soviet shit

[@nguyenphuoc4834]

@@lilMungolow profile mean higher chance of hiding

[@yeetbang8270]

@@kuunoooo7293not the Bradley it saves the crew

[@johaneslerius9943]

I choose BMP-3 Russian😊😊😊❤❤❤🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 From Indonesian🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@kochar1036]

🇷🇺 ❤

[@bamaman6478]

Its about who spots who first, with that in mind Chad Brad wins every time

[@yeetbang8270]

I’ll take Bradley at least I would live

[@Faust1774]

Bradley

[@gayanperera2218]

Bitter truth is 🇷🇺 military equipments are better than 🇺🇸 metal crap 😅😂

[@matthew7027]

Bmp 3 18 Tonnes while brad is 28. Apples and oranges.

[@korsar903]

Естественно бмп 3 ,у нее основное орудие стреляет навесной траекторией , бредли надо выйти на прямую наводку а бмп 3 может кидаться снарядами находясь в укрытии ,так же у нее есть птуры вылетающие из основного орудия P.s для умственно отсталого который написал под этим Комментарием : Бредли для поражения БМП 3 нужна прямая наводка, как для птура так и для автопушки ,чтобы цель была видна ,БМП 3 это не нужно ,её ствол стреляет и пускает птуры по траектории, находясь в укрытии она может поразить Бредли а Бредли только прямой наводкой

[@savvasavva2635]

Так у Бредли ракеты ПТРК есть и разрывные снаряды которые взрываются в определенный момент ,в Бредли все запрограммировано ,поэтому ты ошибся

[@korsar903]

@@savvasavva2635 ты что де6ил? Бмп 3 может птуры пускать из ствола находясь в укрытии (принцип артиллерии) а Бредли для пуска птуров нужна прямая наводка ,как и для снарядов про которые ты пишешь Е6АНАТ НУЖНА ПРЯМАЯ НАВОДКА ЧТОБЫ БПМ 3 БЫЛА ВИДНА А БМП 3 НЕ НУЖНА ПРЯМАЯ НОВОДКА ЧТОБЫ НАНОСИТЬ БРЕДЛИ УРОН ПО ТРАЕКТОРИИ ,МАТ ЧАСТЬ ИДИ УЧИ

[@korsar903]

@@savvasavva2635 лучше бы тебе мозг кто-то запрограммировал чтобы он начал работать

[@korsar903]

@@savvasavva2635 причём тут птрк? Для птрк Бредли нужна ПРЯМАЯ НАВОДКА ЧТОБЫ ЦЕЛЬ БЫЛА ВИДНА ПОЛНОСТЬЮ, КАК И ДЛЯ АВТОПУШКИ ЕЕ ,БМП 3 ЭТО НЕ НУЖНО ,У НЕЕ СТВОЛ СТРЕЛЯЕТ ПО ТРАЕКТОРИИ, НАХОДЯСЬ ЗА УКРЫТИЕМ ОНА МОЖЕТ НАНОСИТЬ БРЕДЛИ УРОН А БРЕДЛИ ТАК НЕ МОЖЕТ, ТЕМ БОЛЕЕ ВЕРНЯЯ ЧАСТЬ БРЕДЛИ НЕ СИЛЬНО БРОНИРОВАННА КАК И ДРУГАЯ ТЕХНИКА ,ПОЭТОМУ СНАРЯД ЛЕТЯЩИЙ (ПО ПРИНЦИПУ МИНОМЕТА) УНИЧТОЖИТ ВЕСЬ ЭКИПАЖ НАХОДЯСЬ В УКРЫТИИ, КОРРЕКТИРОВА БМП 3 ДРОН МОЖЕТ А С БРЕДЛИ ТАК НЕ ПОЛУЧИТСЯ ПОТОМУ В 10 РАЗ ПОВТОРЯЮ ЕЙ НУЖНА ПРЯМАЯ НАВОДКА ЧТОБЫ ЦЕЛЬ БЫЛА ПЕРЕД НЕЙ

[@savvasavva2635]

@@korsar903 ай ай удалил да слил? Оскорбления я осуждаю а тебе противного ни чего не говорил ))