MA8351| DISCRETE MATHEMATICS| UNIT-1|VIDEO-9|PROVING LOGICAL EQUIVALENCES WITHOUT USING TRUTH TABLE

[@rrfoodies7373]

Mam u in the before video associate and distributive law have three variable if two variable there then it becomes absorption la

[@kaviyaaa5458]

Super ah simple ahh explain panringa mam❤ thank you so much mam😍

[@engineeringmathematics9006]

😊😊😊

[@mdgaran0324]

Its good❤ Verry useful

[@ReshmaA-wh5us]

Mam really super I'm following Ur all videos

[@ReshmaA-wh5us]

Mam inaiku nalla eludhuna exam ungalala matum than tq so much night fulla patha its very helpful to me

[@engineeringmathematics9006]

Good all the best

[@kTn..]

thank you mam your explanation is easy to understand 🙂

[@CSEKeerthana-ox9qn]

👍👍

[@vasanthsmart318]

uruttu mass mam

[@joserekha777]

Tqsm

[@Vishal._.chinnadurai]

❤

[@aryasubananth7341]

De morgans law nu change panna odane P implies Q formula pota direct ah answer vandhurchu,so apdi potaalum mark kudupaangla ?

[@engineeringmathematics9006]

Yes

[@RetroVibes-007]

Demorgans law mistake step please explain

[@shadowqueen9780]

Mam show that 7(p^(7p^q)) and (7p^7q) are logically equivalent without using truth table mam indha problem la first part T nu varudhu mam but (7p^7q) idhula 7(pvq) idhoda adha yedhume panna mudiyala mam yepdi mam proof pandradhu indha sum pls reply me mam...naa yellame unga videos dhaa paathen tomorrow all units completed indha sum mattum try panna mam answer varala ..pls reply me mam

[@engineeringmathematics9006]

Question is wrong ma, first statement is tautology, but 2nd is not... Hence both cannot be equivalent... So it's a wrong question

[@shadowqueen9780]

@@engineeringmathematics9006 okk Mam😌