Thanks to the countries that helped us during the Korean War, Korea became what it is now. Korea never forgets their sacrifice and help.
@totsblanca15283 жыл бұрын
From the Philippines 🇵🇭 Looks like We are to put our own ships at par with other "modern" naval ships from other countries. We really need this kind of protection.
@Soggy-In-Seattle2 жыл бұрын
I’m impressed with the skill of everyone doing English interviews. That is an extra challenge to exhibiting a product. And thru a face mask on top of everything else. Well done.
@petronilobuan46483 жыл бұрын
Good our South Koreans Brothers in Arms Together we stand divided we Fall from your Filipino Brothers in Arms! Strength and Honor! For peace and security stability cooperation in the Indo Pacific region! K
@streetgamerztv67222 жыл бұрын
We love and support from the Philippines 🇵🇭❤️🇰🇷
@jeraldsegovia213 жыл бұрын
Since the BRP Jose rizal have Hanwha CMS I think Ph Navy should buy KVLS for both two frigate and also the CIWS of hanwha
@rhonchristianfernando3 жыл бұрын
Panigurado yan dahil halos lahat ng main weapons ng navy ay gawa sa korea, sadyang kinulang lang siguro sa budget kaya di nakuha ang buong package kaya din ffbnw ang mga weapon na yan.
@ShinsengumiTriad3 жыл бұрын
@@rhonchristianfernando sana unahin na tapusin ung mga ffbnw, since gawa naman sa korea ung bagong frigates. Ang pangit tignan ng barko na kulang sa mga systems na pinapaabot na nila ng maraming taon. Tignan nyo ung tarlac-class galing indonesia na hanggang ngayon may ffbnw parin.
@louienielmarcon92483 жыл бұрын
@@ShinsengumiTriad Hopefully matapos na ang pandemic na ito, para naman mabigyan na ng kaukulang budget ang AFP as a whole.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Mk.41 VLS would probably be more reliable since it is the base design and can be bought quickly rather than the KVLS-II which is still in development.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@UC8VW7g4UIjUmvO61cSpoBug Ah, thank you for this information. I was a bit confused since I have never heard of the KVLS-1. I guess the Philippines would rather buy the Mk. 41 VLS since the South Korean anti-ship missiles are going to be mounted on external canisters rather than in a VLS.
@ronricks3 жыл бұрын
The hanwa CIWS is great for our two jose rizal class frigates since the combat management system is from hanwa.
@dcvlogs92033 жыл бұрын
For me it really fits to the phil frigate it will add more fire power
@arcflight3 жыл бұрын
@@brandonpak2445 That would be the Signaal "Goalkeeper" then?
@milhh6303 жыл бұрын
Fregate is useles without destroyers
@Puzzoozoo3 жыл бұрын
The first one looks like they were happy to keep the gun, and just improved the detection ability with more advanced radars.
@Poppop-ut3gh2 жыл бұрын
yeah same GAU-8 30mm
@admiralbeluga64383 жыл бұрын
May favourate channel during pamdemic
@edwardfernandez32043 жыл бұрын
quality and good design, exactly for Philippine modernisation program for navies ang marine.
@rhonchristianfernando3 жыл бұрын
Wow thank you naval news for an exclusive interview we got some good information for plan of our very own philippine navy.
@christiandelanol.tobing46833 жыл бұрын
thank u DSME for the cooperation in chang bogo class/ nagapasa class hope it will expand the cooperation between TNI with Korean Arm forces especially on KF-21/IF-21 Boramae
@josephramos9803 жыл бұрын
Thankyou korea for helping out the Philippines to procure on of your Submarines.
@MotoSan1ty3 жыл бұрын
the philippine navy should buy this korean CIWS . must be cheaper than the US guns . all this new korean products are whats missing in philippine navy's jose rizal class frigates .
@madiidam15383 жыл бұрын
It’s not missing if bong go didn’t interfere and HHI set 2 offer to reduce thats include the ciws and vls sad not they need to find funds to buy the missing teeth of JCF
@jclulu39423 жыл бұрын
Korean CIWS will be cheaper and much better than the Goalkeeper and the Phalanx because the Korean CIWS project is aiming to replace the Phalanx and the Goalkeeper which the Korean navy is currently using with a better and cheaper one as the price of the Phalanx soared after the Goalkeeper was actually discontinued.
@MotoSan1ty3 жыл бұрын
@@jclulu3942 nice to know that sir .. i guess all the philippine navy's naval weapons will be from south korea . hanwa is also the one upgrade the 3 del pilar class so most likely the armements to be added will be the korean ones
@jclulu39423 жыл бұрын
@@MotoSan1ty I think your opinion is very reasonable, Sir.
@lincan41083 жыл бұрын
stay away from those korean chang bo go submarine
@oliverosenot90753 жыл бұрын
Dapat magkaroon Ang pilipinas CIWS para sa Jose Rizal frigate at Antonio Luna.
@maninthemiddleground23163 жыл бұрын
I think nakapila ang CIWS, kasama sa Horizon 3 if I’m not mistaken.
@dcvlogs92033 жыл бұрын
Soon, kaya nga yong frigate is my space for ciws at vls, naka.plan nayan kaya lng needs time, money and so on
@CK-ur2ev3 жыл бұрын
I hope you guys get to ask about the timeline for KDDX, seen only rough timeline of late 2020s so far.
@poke6963 жыл бұрын
I reckon it won't be built before ffx batch3
@someonerandom61373 жыл бұрын
KVLS for the Rizal class frigates, but Scorpene submarines for the PH Navy!
@margiedamiar51623 жыл бұрын
Also CIWS2 from Hanwha system
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Mk.41 VLS would probably be cheaper and easier to maintain (because of worldwide commonality)
@chillridesjohn3 жыл бұрын
thanks for this coverage Naval News, well done!
@drianmortiz93753 жыл бұрын
The KVLS II vertical launch system platform and the CIWS II of Hanwa is a perfect fit for the two Jose Rizal Class Frigates and even to the 3 unit of the Gregorio Del Pilar Class vessels of the Philippine Navy
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
A VLS would be too much for our Del Pilar-class OPVs, we would rather use exposed canisters just like how the US Coast Guard once did it. The Mk.41 would be possibly better since its more available and has more commonality with other neighboring countries.
@drianmortiz93753 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 i dont mean the VLS sir for the Del Pilar Class vessel but the Hanwa built CIWS system. What i mean is that the VLS flatform is well suited to the Jose Rizal Class Frigates which were also acquired from South Korea
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@drianmortiz9375 Ok, it could possibly be fitted but it will take some space (more space than the original Phalanx CIWS fitted on the Hamilton-class Cutters) But it is a good idea and I would wait for its development to be finished.
@neiljanverga2875 Жыл бұрын
Under development pa nga eh. Di pa nasubukan
@a.o.-wn2dk Жыл бұрын
DSME sub for Phil navy. Much better
@blkpearl47543 жыл бұрын
Hoping our ph navy will buy these on our Jose rizal frigates
@princetsa88523 жыл бұрын
according to a news, our Rizal Frigates will have CIWS as part of its package deal. maybe its going to be delayed/late deliver?
@kuyatepzvlog69063 жыл бұрын
we'll see my friend.. i hoping too
@TeamPhilippines3 жыл бұрын
@@princetsa8852 Separate Procurement
@raymondramos70253 жыл бұрын
Sana nga ito na ung acquired ntin brand new ciws ng sokor.
@deathgamer14623 жыл бұрын
Jose Rizal and brp Antonio Luna
@corey84203 жыл бұрын
It's always a good day when I see you guys have put a new video up.
@elizaldeanthony71773 жыл бұрын
God Bless South Korea
@bertdejesus35784 ай бұрын
Philippines is a consistent customer to Korea thats why their proposal is very favorable, They know that Philippines is a very good customer and payors of our loans.
@jihoon123ful3 жыл бұрын
For Ciws2 hoping ROKN should pick both companies ! 👍 both designs!! Love this channel !!
@Joseph-eh4rs3 жыл бұрын
LIG NIX1 ciws was selected.
@tandemcharge51143 жыл бұрын
Hello! I'm here to tell you that your videos are excellent!
@shiroyamato80433 жыл бұрын
scorpene submarine for phil navy❤️
@Joseph-eh4rs3 жыл бұрын
French will ripoff Ph
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
I kind of trust the Phalanx CIWS for now since it is battle proven and in worldwide use (for easy maintenance and part commonality).
@AaronX-et5ms2 жыл бұрын
la diferencia es que tienes que pedir permiso a eeuu para usarlo y no te da transferencia tecnologica a diferencia de corea del sur que si te lo da
@reyalcaraz64732 жыл бұрын
Vs Kashtan? ✊
@BLEEDMOTO3 жыл бұрын
Thanks NAVAL news for this coverage
@tonyrodriguez19833 жыл бұрын
Our new Jose Rizal class ships need these CIWS-ll. Without CIWS the ships are completely defenseless against even the slowest of incoming enemy missiles.
@mikotokoro91363 жыл бұрын
Frigates and destroyers typically have VLS or surface to air missiles that can intercept missiles. So they are not completely defenceless. But are vulnerable if a incoming missile passes long, intermediate, and short range missiles. Examples being SM 2 (long range/Medium range), ESSM(Short range). But if a ship does not have these types of missile systems, then they are defenceless.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
CIWS are only there as the last shield. The main gun and surface to air missiles are also used for anti-missile operations.
@Joseph-eh4rs3 жыл бұрын
@@mikotokoro9136 the problem is two new frigates were bought from South Korea without VLS and CIWS. Just a 76mm deck gun.
@mikotokoro91363 жыл бұрын
@@Joseph-eh4rs yeah. That's what I thought. Its still getting Mistral II, but it's not gonna be able to intercept missiles.....
@LagawWayPlano3 жыл бұрын
The CIWS of Koreans is really good actually I've seen it shoot down missiles
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Wheres the footage?
@kevinalcanzado9743 жыл бұрын
One thing for sure is that the Hyundai heavy industry will bag the Corvette acquisition project for Philippine navy, with the mrf project of Philippine air force are on the track I hope things will be better on the next administration for the AFP modernization also including the submarine acquisition program, DSME 1400 subs are good one also.
@FunfusionDas3 жыл бұрын
Great information 👍 from India
@michaelmoore19323 жыл бұрын
Those are some pretty guns!🤩 hopefully the U.s. could get one of them to replace the phalanx ciws
@halzan74673 жыл бұрын
Well South Koreas CIWS is the Goal Keeper CIWS from the Netherlands. So I don’t know how well the US will incorporate it because it’s a different system. Also Phalanx is around 40-50 years old. So it should get a replacement anytime soon.
@juicymango87853 жыл бұрын
US navy doesn't care much about CIWS system. There are more focusing on intercepting a target from far away. CIWS is the last line of defense and its not a wise choice to prefer CIWS over long ranged anti air missles. To normal countries CIWS is indeed important. But to a large navy like the US who has so much anti ait defense... CIWS is the least of concern
@GlenCychosz3 жыл бұрын
The US 20mm CWIS is much lighter. That is a important factor.
@hsb13213 жыл бұрын
@@GlenCychosz Several years ago, Goal Keeper had been shut down. Then ROKN had to buy the Palanks 20m gun from Raycion, Raycion raised its price double and triple. So ROKN decided to develop 30m CIWS.
@jclulu39423 жыл бұрын
@@GlenCychosz The US Goalkeeper(20mm CWIS) had exposed a lot of problems including its weak destructive power, so even the US navy ever tested the Phalanx to introduce it in 1990 but it was cancelled due to American defense industry's counterblast. The Korean navy used to use the Goalkeeper and now is using the Phalanx. They know very well about both of two CIWS systems. The Korean navy wants a 30mm CIWS to properly respond to the current and future missiles that have been getting bigger and faster that's why now LIG and Hanwha are showcasing more advanced and powerful 30mm CIWS for the Korean navy.
@jeromefelizardo443 жыл бұрын
Very good news for Pilipinos, I hope we can have that technology for our philippine Navy..
@erwinlubay53483 жыл бұрын
Mabuti ma ang south korea tumo tulong sa philipines 👏 Ang america puro second hand.👊
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Alam mo kung bakit second hand ang bigay? Sigurado naman akong alam mo na hindi agad magbibigay ng brand new for free ang mga bansa. Pati nga South Korea eh, Pohang-class natin ay second hand eh.
@Funnymemes7253 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 tama tama ,hindi sila mag bibigay ng advance kahit sino namang bansa luma lang ang dinodonate ,hindi kona explain alam mo naman na ata kung ano dahilan haha
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@Funnymemes725 Tama po kayo haha.
@cliffordbeceril12053 жыл бұрын
Binili ng 16 billion ang dawalang brand new missile frigate Rizal Class at free ang isang 2nd hand Pohang Class corvette. Malaking additional na rin sa Phil Navy fleet.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@cliffordbeceril1205 Ano naman?
@simonejones72323 жыл бұрын
The best offer i hear from other country who supply such kind of submarine technology that they include education of navy personnels. Best offer i hear so far with no political hijacking....
@admiralbeluga64383 жыл бұрын
8:26 Philippine Navy
@jyralnadreth44423 жыл бұрын
The CIWS are certainly more up to date with AESA :) the guns are still short range but they do use simpler ammunition than 35mm AHEAD, 40mm, 57mm and 76mm PFHE/3P etc
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
They use smaller caliber ammunition so the velocity would be a bit faster and they are short range because they are the last shield of the ship.
@Joseph-eh4rs3 жыл бұрын
These are same GE 30mm Gatling gun installed on goalkeeper ciws.
@the_defaultguy3 жыл бұрын
Can protect people -yes Is good -yes Can be on ship -yes Multiple Radar? -yes Looks cool -yes 30mm ? -yes Can detect hostiles long range? -yes Can engage target reaching Mach 3? -yes can go BRRRRRRRRRR? -YES Conclusion: Yes, i love it and i need it.
@jigolocana74923 жыл бұрын
The cwiz of the hanwa system is very compatible to the required cwiz of the jose rizal frigate since it is also equipped with hanwa systems
@ennygarcia88443 жыл бұрын
Just look at that CIWS! Both of them look so badass!
@grkantrker3 жыл бұрын
Respect from 🇹🇷
@angilodologuin82063 жыл бұрын
Sana dadame pang-SUBMARRINE NG PILIPINAS👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊👊
@xeno14533 жыл бұрын
Really hoping the PN will consider the CIWS-2 atleast 2 each per rizal class ships.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
2 each? Where are you gonna put that??
@ALVATOR2 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 On the 2 corvette being build in south korea called HHI 3100
@RyuzoSan192 жыл бұрын
@@ALVATOR OP said "2 each" per Rizal-class. That means 2 on 1 ship, not 1 on 2 ships. And maybe those corvettes will stil not have a place for a second CIWS system, maybe just one, its already enough.
@e.jisaac23653 жыл бұрын
Oh yes! We don't need phalanx because we have this 😁👍🇵🇭🤝🇰🇷
@d.harris13643 жыл бұрын
Very good, but wouldn't the gun be a 30mm GAU 8 avenger?
@jclulu39423 жыл бұрын
Both of Hanwha and LIG use 30mm GAU8/A avenger gun.
@manuelortega46543 жыл бұрын
2 SCORPENE Submarines from Frnace and 2 units from DSME of SK total of 4 Submarines and give softloan and that will be good for our Phil. Navy.
@ballajamesc.25312 жыл бұрын
I hope that DSME offer their DSME 2000 variant to the Philippines.
@dopeboy3879 Жыл бұрын
In my opinion there is a possibility hanwa will be the provider of the ciws since the brp jose rizal is using hanwa cms
@its__sunnysideup3 жыл бұрын
I hope i can download this video for my page😁
@dylanshaft89363 жыл бұрын
What are the dimensions of the KVLS-II?
@heavyMaGn헤비마신간3 жыл бұрын
3.0×2.4×9.8m per module
@watchthe13692 жыл бұрын
the CIWS systems all seem tho have planar arrays with multi target scan with a targeting antenna the first system has electro optical track features too? VLS II uses 8 missile modules that can be strung together and can handle larger missiles? I understood the submarine guy just fine. If you want a more understandable salesman who speaks english- sound like him.
@reygieflorestv133 жыл бұрын
PHILIPPINE KOREA MABUHAY FRIENDSHIP
@shielagairanan1323 жыл бұрын
Successfully sout koria and good blessed from Philippines
@tigersofthesouthfederalsta61632 жыл бұрын
excelllents god bless federal state philippines modernized more to the futures arm forces of the federal state of the philippines ..........good luck to all god be with us federal philippines........yes we votes 1000% to nuclear power plants to the future of the federal philippines............thank u south korea.................✊✊✊✊✊✊✊✊
@tropanghayop17283 жыл бұрын
I hope when this comes into mass production. Our govt select this for the corvette aquisition.
@jojosanchez35843 жыл бұрын
Good for philippines and install the 3 Hamilton class at install strategic Sea lift vessel at install light frigates at any asset some day. More Corvette or more frigates
@inuyashajr8453 жыл бұрын
South korean submarine is Cool too
@coloredplanetantinazifreak55212 жыл бұрын
South korean weapon quality is the most practical for the philippine navy and airforce
@albryanlarona29543 жыл бұрын
Tama ba na rinig ko philippines navy 😍
@margiedamiar51623 жыл бұрын
oo
@dutch63902 жыл бұрын
Excellent ce petit Show Room !!! 👍😁😉
@anjarswandika4067 Жыл бұрын
My favorit millenium gun ciws rheimental
@soldsoul4163 жыл бұрын
Hmm... Intersting.... Hanwa Ciws ll fire power is also good
@r_ic7 Жыл бұрын
Agree ako 100%
@tinobarba82703 жыл бұрын
CMS HANWA system is not yet battle proven is still under testing stage. The CMS (HANWA) communication interface is not compatible with the U.S. and other allied navy ships that could mean a communication disaster in case with Chinese CCP navy encounter. The existing S Korean Frigates and/or Destroyers are still fitted with the CMS Tacticos Thales from Nethwrlands. The previous Philippine frigates BRP J Rizal & A. Luna CMS are HANWA locally manufactured in S. Korea.CMS contract was to install Tacticos Thales CMS but HHI CEO at the time is noted for contract fraudulence instead of Tacticos Thales as per contract the inferior type CMS HANWA system was installed. As for planned purchase of Philippine submarine, Philippine should buy the French made Scorpene type instead of DSME 2000 S Korean brand. The reason S Korea is still new in manufacturing submarines unlike France with more than 30 years of experience!
@r_ic7 Жыл бұрын
perfect fit for phil navy
@rhyzangel28903 жыл бұрын
Thank you korea for the support given to philippine navy. Mabuhay
@arisylphiawhite74143 жыл бұрын
We remember that the Philippines helped us in the Korean War. I will never forget their sacrifice.
@dcvlogs92033 жыл бұрын
I think phil should accept it, it was a good deal
@stangarcia3 жыл бұрын
Top
@cedrickponce35043 жыл бұрын
It's great that our two frigate would have a great choice for ciws ....
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
That CIWS is not even offered to the Philippine Navy.
@yrkim30183 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 but they will sell if phil navy wants it.
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@yrkim3018 Ofcourse they will.
@RednerKlallamStrong3 жыл бұрын
These are what the US is gonna need to stop bruhmos and other skimming missiles . I know is has some good weapons although I say it's time for a huge upgrade for every ship armor vehicles tanks helicopters and jets .
@haa.85833 жыл бұрын
I think the CIWS-II should fit to the Philippine Navy's FF-150 and FF-151 Frigates or basically known as Jose Rizal class frigate. I hope HHI wont forget on compensating the missing Link 16 CMS of the Frigates and also the Philippine Navy should push through the Submarine acquisition and many more i dont care if they choose Naval Group or DSME as long as they'll push the project until this year or 2022 so that it will be delivered earlier and can be used earlier.
@blkpearl47543 жыл бұрын
the U.S will provide the link 16 as i heard
@havierlango26213 жыл бұрын
As I heard, due to the crippling economy of the Philippines caused by the pandemic the acquisition of subs was pushed back to horizon 3(2023-2028)
@Shammie193 жыл бұрын
@@havierlango2621 not really bro the DND has been under negotiations with the South Korean on may
@paulsteaven3 жыл бұрын
@@Shammie19 nah, the PN FOIC already confirmed that the submarine project will be push back to the Horizon 3. Even if the Korean Government will provide the funds thru softloan, the Philippine Government is still required to provide the 15% of the overall budget to start the project. If they can't still provide the needed 15% to start the building of the corvettes and OPVs thru softloan, what more for the more expensive submarines?
@havierlango26213 жыл бұрын
@@Shammie19 likewise with the french (which I preferred) but there are multiple sources already stating that the project has been moved to horizon 3 There's also a lot more projects that needs funding within horizon 2 like: 2 Corvette 2 more strategic sealift vessel 6 OPV (Those the some of the major assests that's needed within horizon 2 too but would likely be pushed back to horizon 3, since the current government doesn't want this to be a midnight proj. like what happened to the 2 JRC)
@jayahn223 жыл бұрын
HW is saying "Their CIWS2 is able to strike the target at the speed up to Mach 3 ???" Really ?????? Hopefully.. But, Have a doubt on its capability comparing with Phalanx and Goalkeeper....
@pdarley583 жыл бұрын
Thats a Goalkeeper copy (albeit with an AESA Radar)..
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
So the GAU-8 30mm rotary cannon is only exclusive to the Goalkeeper? Because that doesnt make any sense.
@raymundnate10713 жыл бұрын
can it detect broken heart
@jadetorr63603 жыл бұрын
Is this already tested?
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Probably not, thats what Im worried about too.
@kakashivillegas3712 жыл бұрын
I like the new version of submarine, but they only offer the old one just because of it is proven. The new one is better because it is the improved virsion of the old virsion.
@madlyanthonygile8783 жыл бұрын
I guess the Scorpene Class is a much better option for the Phil. Navy
@margiedamiar51623 жыл бұрын
I vote for scorpene class sub and i wish philippines will buy the ciws and vls from s.kor
@harveyblanquisco67383 жыл бұрын
Yep, Scorpene is better than DSME1400
@imnottaco49283 жыл бұрын
This video is not present it's last year
@reyalcaraz64732 жыл бұрын
Kashtan kashtan kashtan lang sakalam!!!!!!!!!
@TV-di6wc3 жыл бұрын
와우 자랑스럽다
@ohkabomb9173 жыл бұрын
What we really need is a tech transfer agreement.
@princetsa88523 жыл бұрын
I like the 2 new models of CIWS of ROK?! I hope the philippine also consider koreas offer of submarines
@TinolangPakwan3 жыл бұрын
The chang bogo class? Nahh bro the scorpene class is much more superior
@harveyblanquisco67383 жыл бұрын
France Scorpene 2000 submarine is better
@britamericaball25053 жыл бұрын
French Scorpene is superior than Chang Bogo.
@jclulu39423 жыл бұрын
You should know that DSME-1400 and Scorpene 2000 are different from each other in purpose, displacement and price. 1. Displacement : DSME-1400 - 1600 ton (full load) / Scorpene2000 - 2000 ton (full load) 2. Unit Price : DSME-1400 - 367 million USD *(price in 2011)* / Scorpene2000 - minimum 500~600 million USD *(price in 2005 / +50~60 million if AIP added)* Scorpene2000 is a good sub. So DSME-1400 is as DSME subs are called a Legend in RIMPAC(Rim Of The Pacific Exercise) by showing its overwhelming performance over decades. Also the Indonesian navy recently established its track record of diving 310 meters deep underwater with DSME-1400. The most important thing for the PN is that the Scorpene2000 is much more expensive than DSME-1400 even though both subs are all good. The PN is a beginner in sub operation, so I think it would be good for the PN to start with DSME-1400 that is much cheaper and also good in quality. If the PN doesn't care for any, why not KSS-lll batch-2 with a 5000 ton displacement, which is the only conventional sub in the world that has a vertical missile launch system and run by lithium-ion battery and also much more superior to the Scorpene????
@jingorooroad25593 жыл бұрын
@@jclulu3942 I don't know so much about the DSME, but the scorpene are famous submarines used by many countries all over the world, and are ultra silent proven submarines. How long the submarine is able to stay under the sea without going up, and many other technical details are very important in the choice.
@fkelaomster25833 жыл бұрын
Wow! thank you again Mr. Xavier Vavassuer & Naval Group for making a special segment/topics just for the Philippine Navy's ambitious submarine project.. Personally, i'll still prefer Naval Group's Scorpene-class subs, a way more better sweetened offer compared to DSME..
@thevulcan2011 Жыл бұрын
Jet fighter is the only thing remain from their product catalogs now
@jhunalmero88913 жыл бұрын
Philippines badly needed this awesome weapons in protecting its maritime domain.🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
@Armoredunit3 жыл бұрын
Para sa West Philippine Sea
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@Armoredunit West Philippine Sea is the government designation of the actual name: South China Sea. No, I am not saying it belongs to China.
@Armoredunit3 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 To foreign countries it's "South China sea" to The Philippines it's "West Philippines sea" One question are you a foreigner
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@Armoredunit No, I am not a foreigner and WPS is the government designation, SCS is being used by the Philippines as well. Who cares about the name, using WPS wont make you claim it and using SCS doesnt mean its claimed by China. If you think only the Philippines owns it, youre wrong, it is shared by possibly 4-5 countries.
@Armoredunit3 жыл бұрын
@@RyuzoSan19 yeah and the countries are Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia and will the Philippines Just call it a part of the ocean so no one will be angry got it
@rosillerantonio6732 Жыл бұрын
Welcome South Korea to the Philippines. South Korea, help the Philippines to have two submarines, it is the (DSME 3000) that needs to be fully durable, fully advanced, fully equipped, fully upgraded high-technology. it is necessary for the security, and especially for the defense, of the country philippines. 
@bongbongozarop71063 жыл бұрын
Good for Phillipine navy warship
@goldwhale183 жыл бұрын
Wow 😎😎😎
@TrishtonTV3 жыл бұрын
Wowwwww
@mropinion44903 жыл бұрын
Sana pati helicopter carrier ioffer ng sokor saatin
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
Walang kwenta yan dito.
@samhyrampatriarca20763 жыл бұрын
👌👌👌
@trustjesusoursavior41793 жыл бұрын
WE NEED CIWS THAT CAPABLE OF DESTROYING HYPERSONIC GLIDER MISSILE.
@bonkersblock3 жыл бұрын
Most likely Philippines will end up acquiring the scorpene systems from France!! Full package includes training facilities and parts, also some technology transfers! For around 75 billion pesos/ 2.8 billion euros..
@teddy27383 жыл бұрын
¿ Who submarines Scorpene 2000 adquiring Philippines Navy to Naval Group ?
@naufalendram80633 жыл бұрын
It would be better to start with DSME
@RyuzoSan193 жыл бұрын
@@naufalendram8063 Im pretty sure the Scorpene is already chosen for the job.
@z51703 жыл бұрын
Sana makita toh ng TWITTER USERS na puro BASH
@dcvlogs92033 жыл бұрын
SK subs would be more affordable than france
@Olive_Chap2 жыл бұрын
Indian navy should look these products
@davepanganiban5713 жыл бұрын
Base on some vids and articles i red the PN wants there submarine ro have missiles hoping it is true
@charliedelena72353 жыл бұрын
south korea is the best interms of technology
@jingorooroad25593 жыл бұрын
In cell phones technologies maybe, but in military technologies this is another story. Europe and USA are the number ones in military technologies.
@jingorooroad25593 жыл бұрын
@개냥냥 India and other countries. Ok I look the list of the countries using K9 from Korea. The least clients is only 4 countries, the most is 7 countries. Depending on the websites. So it's difficult to confirm what's the truth about the K9 users number. Ok now if we look Europe and USA, both already sold and have much more users than K9. I mean just France alone, which is the 1st European weapons seller and the 3rd world weapons seller. France alone already has 7 clients countries and users of its Nexter CAESAR Canon howitzer (number confirmed correctly by all websites). So claiming K9 is selling more than Europe and USA, was something very pretentious, as France alone already did better than K9, especially I only counted the numbers of Nexter CAESAR Canon howitzer clients, not yet included the Nexter AMX equivalent of K9.