Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) Propulsion - What Is It?

[@ritukiran]

Mercury can be used in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). MHD is a branch of physics that studies the magnetic properties of electrically conducting fluids, such as liquid metals like mercury, and how they behave. MHD combines Maxwell's equations with hydrodynamics to describe the macroscopic behavior of fluids like plasmas or liquid metals. It used to be used in the vimaanas. For example, a two-phase liquid metal MHD system that uses mercury and air is used to study generator behavior at high void fractions. Another test facility uses a mercury circulating loop with an azimuthal magnetic field to investigate the transition from laminar to turbulent flow in MHD generators. Mercury is one of the simplest examples of an electrically conducting fluid. It can be used in a rotating transformer with a coil to create a magnetic field. The current can flow in one direction or the other depending on the polarity of the current.

[@revanvonheaven8270]

Ferrofluids a mutated version would be even better

[@leahgarrison6665]

wow, cool! I am excited to keep learning about this until I get a full grasp of these concepts.

[@ethanrom22]

Yes, “Die Glocke” the nazis had this tech at the end of the war

[@eastindiaV]

Die Glocke, they just use that to turn old ass men into little kids again, so they can live for a thousand years, which is what was promised. MHD systems have the potential to harness inertial magnetic confinement, using mercury, and leverage power distribution systems, to create a sustained antimatter reaction. This Antimatter, comprised of resonant wavelengths of light, is much safer to use than mercury, in a more broad range of systems.

[@Aaro4ify]

Bismuth would be more efficient then this we no longer rely on such outdated tech

[@Tocqueville2023]

Coming out of the Marines in 77 and not having any background or math skills, I decided to major in computer science which needs a bunch of higher math..I managed a very strong D ...but I got into mechanical design using 4 or 5 different cad and engineering design systems...amazing I spent 20+ years ..9 at ford, 3 at gm and 2 years at bosch..I loved it. I realizes that graphical means of studying mathematics..enabled me to apply all that stuff even though Math was my very worst subject..

[@stevenw4549]

Good for you, but how does that relate to the subject of this video?

[@calicoesblue4703]

@@stevenw4549 It was a interesting story & if we are gonna have technology like this, then math is absolutely necessary. Don’t be a cynic 🤷🤦

[@stevenw4549]

@@calicoesblue4703 Wasn't knocking math. Just the comment didn't seem to relate to this video. Yea with Biden as president and me getting old, I am a bit cynical. Not looking forward to WW III either.

[@calicoesblue4703]

@@stevenw4549 Well, Biden is Far Better then that Ass Clown Trump 🤡. But yeah, we are definitely heading towards World War 3.

[@PigeonLaughter01]

Graphing helps me too! Glad you found success. Cheers!

[@cee3do358]

Thank God you're back... I've followed you for years and your content is by far the best that can be found. Mix your content, common sense, and an appropriately filtered perspective on the info available to the public enables you to draw some solid conclusions for the questions of who, what, why, and how surrounding the presence of these crafts. Thank you Mavi! I don't know how you coiled such a vast library you previously shared but.. Wow. IMO - all the disclosure I needed to see.

[@alexrossouw7702]

I like how the stock footage of the crafts shows them flying in my city, Cape Town

[@taylordolletzki15]

Thomas Townsend Brown discovered this 70 years ago. Thank you for being in depth.

[@simonzinc-trumpetharris852]

That was only pseudoscience.

[@MT-THNDR207]

Indeed. Using the dielectric constant of air and the kinetic energy of atoms to propel an aerodynamic object.

[@Flagg1]

​@MT-THNDR207 very doable

[@리정우-w3g]

How will your aircraft create and control high temperature plasma? And how will you manage the interaction between magnetic fields and the surrounding environment? Also, how will you ensure the stability and control of your concept flying saucer?

[@76fuhrersteelskin45]

No steering wheels 😜- DHM

[@giltiger]

I think as you altered fluid aerodynamics with an aileron in a airplane, in a MHD and/or EHD propulsion system (evidently use hyper-fast computer control of the field) we can master field changes to alter the intensity of the flux around the flying saucer shape to create a differential of forces to turn or incline the system to MOVE the entire "ship" or "flying saucer" we are in, to pull or push in the direction we must or want to go!!! 😁

[@billywilliams6147]

What are your thoughts on compressing the hollow plasma tours with oxygen. These air molecules will act as a force on the plasma (a thermo plasma to a point it's squeezing it or pushing down on this plasma while the MHD accelerators this ferro magnetic plasma for Antigravity propulsion. I don't believe that this is true an that if effect PSI air pressure is added on this that the tours doesn't hover, but instead the tours at normal speeds for propulsion would create a Mass Reduction. So instead of 0 60 miles per hour in seconds.... How ever this method will cause the tours to go from 60Lbs to 0 weight in seconds an could help with G Forces on Pilots. If the craft is loosing its mass then the engines can propel the craft faster than it normally would.

[@anthonyb5279]

He wont do any of this its science fiction. He does not understand any of this stuff correctly he is very confused probably schizophrenic.

[@YTTOAYN]

If anyone is interested in discussing this, I think I might actually be onto something, I'd love to talk to someone on the same wavelength

[@cayrick]

This was discussed in my ME education in '70. I am surprised this has not moved a whole lot further towards reality in the intervening period.

[@jojolafrite90]

It was almost completely suppressed.

[@effervescentrelief]

There's a lot of nifty things that have never been moved forward. If it doesn't use fuel, don't expect it to see the light of day. But what about EVs? Ultimately great gobs of fuel are involved. In mining the materials, to the power plant.

[@jacquesfunchess2821]

Tesla anyone? 100+ years man!

[@MARILYNANDERSON88]

New light weight tough materials will make it happen with strong new magnet options.

[@mpmansell]

It didn't need suppressing because it was technically infeasible for practical use. The primary problem is it requires a lot of energy and we are now only starting to see technology that can provide that energy for short periods of time.

[@francisdavis1271]

The concept requires two very significant accomplishments: 1) High temperature superconductors and 2) Power generation that is huge yet lightweight. The field density would be problematic. Field strength decays by radius squared (R**2) but don't stand too close or it'll pull your metal frame glasses off your face.

[@raysplay2827]

there is a patent by navi claiming room-temperature superconductors using crystals. "Piezoelectricity-induced High Temperature Superconductor"

[@danielfoster2788]

Magnetically cancelled electrogravity is much safer and requires tuning not blunt raging force.

[@adr3ns]

Or hydrostatic motors to induce the geometry...

[@danielfoster2788]

Exactly:) non magnetic antigravity and standby always on warp systems requires permanent warp looping to feedback destination jump drives are not a negative mass fuel. Coil to Sonic Continuum resonance is fairly time stable merely tilt inner interpolar D/C coils for closest Mass resonance, then pulse Hemispherical coils A/C resonance destination pulsing.

[@trailspike4938]

You can resonate smaller field apparatuses so as to obtain a tighter field since you only have to affect the immediate area around the structure body.

[@realherbalism1017]

Wow, it's incredible how similar MHD drive sounds to the flying vehicles in the Indian classics, you know, the Vimana's that allegedly used engines powered by mercury. That's also interesting because mercury is also a magnetohydrodynamic fluid.

[@Aaro4ify]

This one uses ionized air and uses the lorentz force to create lift Though. There can be an issue with using mercury the fumes can be highly toxic it's organic Mercury that's the issue this doesn't use Mercury at all

[@waynegnarlie1]

Do you think it would work if you substituted a low melting point metal for mercury, like gallium, tin-bismuth? Expensive, but cheap enough for a proof of concept.

[@zazugee]

@@waynegnarlie1 it's interesting bc some scientists analyized some meta-material recovered from an alleged UFO crash, and they found it was mainly made from bismuth

[@waynegnarlie1]

@@zazugee That is interesting indeed! Bismuth has the unique distinction as the most diamagnetic element. Mercury is inferior in this regard. When Bismuth is exposed to magnetic fields, it generates it own phase-reversed magnetic field, that repels magnetic fields. I think we have our working "fluid" for the current collector.

[@zazugee]

@@waynegnarlie1 that's interesting, i never heard of this info before i watched an interview with jaques vallee, and garry nolan did study that piece and noticed peculiarities about it, some suggested it was used as a higher frequency wave guide, tbh i don't know much about materials

[@fluxcapacitor]

There is not a single MHD, but two kinds. MHD in liquids or in hot gases like thermonuclear plasmas (as in stars) is at thermal equilibrium and is governed by a high magnetic Reynolds number. It poses no issues to engineers, besides the mandatory high-power electromagnets and the electrical generator on board. On the contrary, weakly ionized gases (also called "non-thermal plasmas") are far from equilibrium, which means that only the "electron gas" is hot, while the heavy gas (neutral and ions) stays at room temperature (BTW that's why you can hold a fluorescent tube in your hand without burning). This MHD is that of low magnetic Reynolds numbers, and that's why MHD applications in ionized gases are so difficult to master and develop. Because when a non-thermal plasma with low-magnetic Reynolds number is magnetized with a strong magnetic field (critical Hall parameter involved), a nasty, very fast instability arises: the _electrothermal instability_ (discovered by E. Velikhov in 1962) as well as thermal blockage, which ruins the efficiency of such converters and makes them impractical. Only when the electrothermal instability is tamed (with a method discovered by JP Petit in 1983) can MHD converters in ionized gases exist. For air-breathing hypersonic applications, apparently only the Russians managed to crack the nut.

[@terranearthling9918]

Loved it! Even the talk of Positronium Biproduct caused by Bremsstrahlung Radiation. You have crossed your t's and dot your lower case j's. AMAZING!

[@anthonyb5279]

No he got all that wrong.

[@callyman]

Great explanation! You filled in alot of gaps for me. Thanks 🙂

[@xrayaiz74]

Thanks for this video and accompanying graphics. Some scientific phenomena are difficult for some people to visualize and these animations really help for someone like me. I think the technology is absolutely what's needed to move planet Earth forward from the things we use at present which feel sloppy and inefficient to me. They were innovative in their day, but their day has passed and it's time for something new--progression. As a planetary society, we should have been down this path a long time ago but I think certain efforts have been repeatedly retarded by those who would like to keep making money off of outdated technology. In my opinion, it's time to move on as quickly as possible. Time is the one thing we cannot make more of or suppress. Please continue to bring knowledge and enlightenment for those of us who want to learn about these things. Thanks again for the video. AsteronX is my science class on KZbin!🌎🛸🙂

[@SPHYNX99752]

I like your train of thought. I too enjoyed the visual effects, they look like something I scribbled on my living room walls one day when I woke up from a dream.

[@christurnblom4825]

Thank you. Ever since I saw a man on a "citizen's hearing on disclosure" video, showing an equation explaining that mass-inertia is a Lorenze force component I have been salivating at the idea that the public is getting close to disclosure on many "free energy" and gravity manipulation technologies. I hate learning higher math so I tend not to study it. But I try to learn as much about physics as I can without running into my distaste for math so much. For example, I haven't checked the equation talked about in the first sentence but I do understand what the man was saying when he mentioned it.

[@Chicken_Little_Syndrome]

Lorentz was very wrong about many things.

[@darkopodbevsek4022]

How is CSE conected with antigravity maybe someone explain ??

[@christurnblom4825]

@@darkopodbevsek4022 I likely can't answer because I'm just a redneck who loves physics. But one never knows... This may cause you to write off any aptitude I have ,off the cuff ...but: What is CSE? and if your question is in relation to my comment, the next question would be: "Is 'anitgravity' the best term to use in the question you are asking or is there a more succinct or accurate term that can be used, as "antigravity" is often a misnomer?"

[@christurnblom4825]

@@Chicken_Little_Syndrome DO TELL!!... I'm self-taught in physics so I didn't get a well-rounded education. I see something that interests me & try to learn as much as I can. For instance, Stan Meyers water-car was the last major thing I dove into & I think I probably dug up every peice of video he was ever on, published on the web. I also tried to follow others wo were trying to replicate his work. I'm basically suck at the par where I don't even have the money for the stainless steal to build his electrolysis cell or to investigate ordering custom-doped magnet wire for his "voltage intensifier circuit". ...I built my own small cell out of wall-outlet plates but without replicating his cell or the custom alloy in his circuit, it's kinda pointless. Played around with some of John Bedini's motors too. Built his S.G. motor perfectly per the instructions.

[@marcv2648]

Which guy was it explaining mass/inertia as a Lorentz force component? I'd like to see that.

[@xanderunderwoods3363]

So glad I found your channel, this is the future of flight.

[@Anksh0usRacing]

The future was here in 08. This is present tech, we need more people working on it though to make it available to the masses quicker.

[@garrypricelaketenkiller9272]

My wife and I saw into a craft that had 2 creatures behind them was a wall of the most pure acrylic. It was a bank of individual circulation system. They were moving trucks in the middle of the night.

[@johnnylego807]

Elaborate? Little confused.

[@timothyp.southwick6542]

I'm blocked from sharing some things unfortunately. I've subscribed to your yt chan. I've also a fb under the same profile name & picture as my yt chan

[@dayvancowboi9135]

Intriguing, I imagine the power usage of such a system is tremendous. Let's hope some of the work on proton-boron fusion via lasers or FRC pans out.

[@TheLumberJacked]

Supposedly zero point energy is used. Seems the only way to go, if it’s even real, since it doesn’t require consumable materials on board to generate the energy.

[@Anksh0usRacing]

It can be powered by a nuclear reactor. If we can miniaturize it, it’ll eventually fit in body’s as small as a car. Right now it’s only in top secret government craft. (tr3-b astra, telos, and various other black project crafts) the only reason I know about these is because I live right next to a Lockheed Martin facility and I’m pretty sure I seen them testing something similar to the tr3bs over the lake we’re next to. Due to the nature of these craft, they bend gravity around them, resulting in the bottom looking like it’s reflecting what’s above it. Pretty cool stuff. Really easy to hide at night when your ship looks like a moving black hole

[@cjdelphi]

​@@Anksh0usRacingI don't believe so, I'll put money on a fusion drive powered by hydrogen (water) That's what can be seen in Chile when they are invisible on normal camera and visible only in infrared

[@nealcorbett1149]

Not at all, if you recycle ions.

[@AmigoMurcho]

@@Anksh0usRacingor maybe it is just a camouflage to make it stealth

[@rikimitchell916]

Observation, a magnetic field is ALWAYS perpendicular to the current that generated it, also check out pointing flow as general a principle

[@justanotherguy469]

ALWAYS !!! Poynting vector. I am not impressed with this video. F=ma is just so Newtonian.

[@johndawson6057]

​@@justanotherguy469 hmm tell me more, why are you not impressed

[@justanotherguy469]

@@johndawson6057 Because it is a technology whose foundation is 358 years old. It is just plain old force equals mass times acceleration. There is a limit to how fast you can travel. What impresses me is the interdimensional methods of propulsion.

[@HOWBAZARY]

Thank you. That helped me to visualize what I have been thinking about for a while now. With the proper magnetic force you should be able to rip apart/separate/bend light (radiation) energy.

[@robertlee4809]

It happens in space...constantly....hence, gravitational lensing....

[@staninjapan07]

Thank you so much. That was a bit beyond my comprehension, but fascinating.

[@timduvall6488]

Very good briefing and tutorial to explain the electrodynamics and fluid conducting material and operation of the craft.

[@Pavel_Poluian]

There is an interesting design of aircraft, but they rarely talk about it, because this thing is secret. The topic of pulsed plasma thrusters has been developed since the early 60s (see PPT - Pulsed plasma thruster) - they are usually designed for spacecraft. But we will talk about a little-known design - these are plasma propulsion panels for aircraft, where the same Pulsed plasma thruster, but reduced to the size of a pencil and stacked in the form of cells in the panel. The design resembles a conventional plasma TV screen, where there are also discharge cells that activate the glow of pixels on the screen. And plasma propulsion panels have long discharge cells, the arrester has a railgun architecture (just rail contacts or coaxial), and the ionized discharge air is accelerated there by the Lorentz force to enormous speeds - a kind of ramjet engine is obtained. Just imagine! - tens of thousands of small ramjet engines assembled in a panel and firing plasma synchronously with a huge frequency (hundreds of kilohertz). Thus, plasma propulsion panels create lift by pulsed emission of plasma jets from railgun cells. There are tens of thousands of cells in the panel, they shoot at a frequency of hundreds of kilohertz, a huge pulse is obtained, and the plasma swirls the air into toroidal rings - the aircraft is held on this air cushion. Horizontal acceleration is created by the same plasma panels on the sides of the device (they glow, from the side they look like "portholes"). Such devices like "triangle" or "disk" have been observed for a long time, they are mistaken for alien ones - but these are terrestrial devices. They are classified and used for espionage and secret actions. Pulsed electromagnetic technology generates microwave radiation, therefore it is harmful to health. They rarely fly - only military missions. Therefore, they are not suitable for a citizen. This maintained the secrecy. Now they are already declassifying - many people know about this secret technique. When declassified, they will be used for cargo airships. But there is a danger that they are now going to be adapted to deliver small nuclear charges to decision-making centers - such means of delivery are not specified anywhere, are not conventional. This lowers the threshold for starting a war. It would be necessary to declassify them as soon as possible. That's why I'm writing about it. However, I have written before - starting with the book "The Elimination of UFOs" and many articles. There are also videos on my KZbin channel - "Declassified UFO" and "UFO Anatomy".

[@Flagg1]

​@Pavel_Poluian it's all man made

[@moineagu1]

FUTURE IS HERE!! BRILLIANT CONGRATULATIONS

[@markcampbell7577]

Similar to indirect use of electric power. AC magnetic field collection is an example of this principle you can collect power passively from AC power lines to use for lights refrigerator or air conditioning. The outlets in you house have been modified to accept the AC magnetic field based devices.

[@charlessmarr7107]

Thanks for the refresher!

[@The_Unexplainer]

In the Varginha UFO crash, allegedly the crash site was covered with strange liquid. Could it be that the liquid is what was used on that craft to generate lift?

[@aufornvic]

Makes sense. The witness said the fluid had unusual properties and looked odd.

[@luisarias8077]

The fluid was from the suits. They need to be in suits fill with fluid to withstand the g-force.

[@robertlee4809]

​@@luisarias8077 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@stepside2839]

@@robertlee4809 -> I’m still laughing😂🤦🏻‍♂

[@Pickchea]

​@@luisarias8077there wouldn't be g force in a non reactionary propulsion craft, no inertia at all

[@manuelf.magana7227]

Llevo fantaseando con esto desde hace un año, ahora he comenzado a estudiar la vibración mecánica, espero acercarme cada vez mas a algo como esto!

[@williamschram]

Which reference inspired the 6:03 diagram, specifically the use of opposed magnetic fields?

[@Mannipth]

Thank You!

[@Brotsalat80]

About 15 years ago I did build a rig to test that. I used a pump, a spiral formed hose filled with ferrofluid and neodymium magnets. All installed on a small balance to see if there is any effect. Unfortunately I did not have that much money by that time and after the pump broke down all came to an end. Was interesting to see that topic at KZbin 😊

[@iNDY1001]

Pretty sure wings only work when air flow is attached to the surface of the wing and flow difference between the top and bottom of the wing, the faster flowing air taking the longer path has a net lower pressure than the slower moving air underneath taking a shorter path. That difference in pressure causes lift, so long as the air flow remains attached. The effect is entirely localized around the wing, that's why turbulence causes the sudden drops as the gusts are causing the the air to detach and the lift to momentarily disappear till the airflow can reattaches and is able to generate lift. Modern cars use it all the time, I know my car uses it to create low pressure pockets to help pull hot air out of the radiator. Unfortunately MHD never got much past trials in lab settings as the electrolysis of the water often created H2 bubble signature due to the current being applied directly to the water. In space the mass needed to act as a reaction mass limits load capacity size. I'm still putting my money on solar sails capturing the solar wind pressure created by solar radiation or great big glass orbs or lenses located at Lagrange points focus solar radiation to help speed up solar craft, so they don't need to carry as much reaction mass.

[@alanmalcheski8882]

pfffft solar propeller bro. It has to be upwards of 40000 rpms with the special mercury to fool the universe into thinking it's a planet. Thereby giving it gravity.

[@alanmalcheski8882]

not the propeller, the old design. The propeller design was patented by Nassim Haramein.

[@zazugee]

I remember some retired CIA agent who said we already have the technology to take the ETs back home and this whole thing reminds me of the "hiding in plain sight" quote I suspect the anti-gravity fed to the UFO community was just a counter-intel thing to make prevent the general public from not knowing about that MHD can already solve inter-stellar travel.

[@rawryxd9026]

thats ben rich, he is an aerospace engineer who invented stealth tech who worked at lockheed, ur also right on the counter info thing as it is suspected that lighter than air craft use this to get about.

[@Anksh0usRacing]

@@rawryxd9026 it’s not just lighter than air, the MHD drives reduces an objects mass by 89%, allowing something the size of a football field to move faster than anything we have now because it’s gravity is less than normal on earth gravity.

[@rawryxd9026]

@@Anksh0usRacing so theres a correlation between the lorentz forces and what not as well as charges and fields (magnetism) and gravity. Also you dont need mass reduction with something made of some super material thats lighter than air and propelled by mhd that has nno friction or strainn on it from the air around it. Most lighter than aircraft are around the size of a football field as well (at their larger sizes though there may be smaller models. This would even without the eledged mass reduction may hit mach 5 or more provided with adequite power and certain materials. What im saying is, the mhd propulsion and air resistance reduction along side materials, nuclear power and lighter than air make somethinng akin to what would look like mass reduction.

[@jmchdjaimerporkpuedolol3681]

@@rawryxd9026 you guys have never done any engineering design besides pulling idealized numbers from your ass and it shows

[@Anksh0usRacing]

@@rawryxd9026 And I’m saying it already exists. The TR3B Astra, Telos and whatever other variants they may have. The description I gave you is about the craft, as well as using info from several US government patents. The materials they use are pretty much the same as conventional, the main difference is the mixture of alloys, so typically aluminum yes, but mixed no doubt with the same stuff they coated the SR71 in.

[@kevinb.8649]

Thought it was left hand rule for magnetic field propagation in a wire with flowing current? So is the Lorenz just the mirror image reverse of that? Or the polarity of the fields propagated by the electric current in a wire? That’s confusing.

[@MT-THNDR207]

Right hand rule, according to online sources. Thumb indicates electron flow, and fingers, field direction.

[@Rob-ro7nc]

I think the best idea for getting propellant out of empty space is a tailored geometry. Good Luck! ;-)

[@mikel4879]

user dd3k... • "Empty space" is not empty at all. How do you think everything exists at all? "Atoms", you, galaxies, the Universe?!? Everything created ( and also sustained ) from nothing?🤔 🥴😏

[@Rob-ro7nc]

@@mikel4879 @Mike l Dear Mike, it´s exactly about Zero-point energy (ZPE) and beyond.

[@Rob-ro7nc]

And if that doesn't go far enough for you when it comes to life, the next big area is transcendence: 1. it's about logic, 2. creating logic, 3. fulfilling logic. And yes, there is much more to life; for example common life goals and how to organize them, do not harm life, Individualism and why it is needed at all, every life form is as important as the whole life, build endless family forests, how to form your own infinity...etc

[@stoneneils]

I like the idea of turning the craft into a boze einstein condensate...no..wait.i mean one entangled wave..i'm so lost but i heard you can turn many atoms into basically one wave function?

[@Rob-ro7nc]

@@stoneneils I was talking about geometry. I would start by trying to think in sub-nano scale geometries. Good Luck! :)

[@mysteryguest9555]

My next question would be, how much energy would be required to make this functional. Are we talking about nuclear power plant type of power or something less?

[@asteronx]

Much, much, less, equal to or less than conventional aircraft ;)

[@clementvining2487]

@@asteronx How this takes a lot of electricity or a fusion power supply for the ionizing and electric and magnetic fields?

[@nil981]

@@asteronx I'm doubtful about that claim. If experimental and prototype technologies that utilize electromagnetic fields are immensely power hungry. And require very extensive cooling systems.

[@alainmerit7971]

HI ?You have done another great video , beautiful designs ! next step , end of "black hole" or "dark energy" or whatever no sense words ...there are some visible univers and invisible univers . the most difficult concept to accept is negative energy and negative masses , and the possibity of another speedlight in this invisible univers ( and also our ) so according to Jean-pierre Petit , if a starship was able to convert its positives energy and mass into negative , it seem for a observer that the ship desappears , i wish you'll show us with your talent , what could be such a ship , and what we could see. Bonne journée !

[@asteronx]

Indeed, we are working on an upcoming video about FTL Propulsion, it will be for FTL propulsion what this video is for MHD propulsion :) Thank you for the reminder about Petit's theory! We'll have to mention that.

[@alainmerit7971]

@@asteronx Thanks for all you did ! you do a great and necessary work , encore bravo!

[@orlinchirinos1981]

Good 👍 explanation of the MHD propulsion.

[@giltiger]

As an old sci-fi fan, this wonder video fills the knowledge gap to understand the basics to the future propulsion systems we dream of and what is missing to get there!!

[@revanvonheaven8270]

Its the thing that can get you assassinated!

[@giltiger]

@@revanvonheaven8270 YEP I dont know from where that last sentence go there in my Control+V... KKK!!!ERASED!

[@boxlessthinker1973]

Nicely presented! Very heady topic made understandable! Thank you!

[@paulharding366]

I love how the animated mhd craft they use at the beginning look like the troop carriers from the 80's sci fi series ' V ' and the star trek ships.

[@beatsntoons]

what a fantastic video :) thank you, KZbin for recommending this to me. Subscribed :)

[@Alarix246]

I am very curious about these forces. The video was very well prepared. Yet any connection to reality was missing, or did I miss it? Nothing shown here does not exist yet. Correct?

[@Automatons.]

Not yet, that we know of. Its safe to assume the US has a backyard somewhere studying and testing these theories.

[@zekebrawnkowski8216]

On the right track by using extraterrestrial parabolic MHD propulsion as a starting point for human research. The toroidal depictions are excellent. Keep pushing forward.

[@Артем-ъ9м9е]

По-А PRI ORI - прежде исследования...на себе проведи.. Те. -" Жесткой посадки"... За одно словосочетание - исследование на людях.

[@TexasRy]

YES YES YES, FANTASTIC VIDEO, thank you! I have been seeing this in my dreams since I was a kid and always thought we needed to use high spin mercury, under immense pressure, rotating at "light speeds", passing through high voltage at a specific resonance/frequency, to provide lift! Pair this with a way to track and "ride" magnetic and gravity fields and you have a "pathway" to "ride"! Pair the Lorentz Force with magnetic fields in the area (positive/negative) to provide pull/lift, kind of like a sail in a boat, generating a magnetic field that "pairs" with the fields around the craft, providing pull/momentum in a certain direction, tie that to computers that scan/calculate the "local fields" and as long as you can "get off the ground" and attach to a "magnetic path", you have a magnetic "roadway" to travel!

[@tomarmstrong1281]

Over fifty years ago, I remembered reading an article on splitting water into its constituents atoms of oxygen and hydrogen by MHD. There has been no mention of this process recently, considering that there is a lot of talk of hydrogen nowadays as an energy source.

[@N.E.U.R.O]

Look up Stan Meyer

[@tomarmstrong1281]

@@N.E.U.R.O His claims never stood up to careful examination.

[@spencerhansen8374]

@@tomarmstrong1281 who's careful examination?

[@tomarmstrong1281]

@@spencerhansen8374 Peer review and replication of results under controlled conditions.

[@jshaw4757]

​@@tomarmstrong1281So basically like making 5 sandwiches whilst your friends watch in your controlled environment I.e your kitchen...same thing lol

[@kyivwithgeofftanya5546]

What about spinning mercury to generate a separate gravity bubble combined with this propulsion 😊

[@bringtheideas460]

The ion wind propulsion is just BIG NOOOOO. It is insanely inefficient. Most of your generator/battery/engine energy goes to actually ripping the air (mostly N2 O2) apart into ions (ionisation) and then a little bit into motion of the wind and equaly opposito to your craft motion...

[@andrewreynolds912]

Recently weeks ago darpa was looking into this technology to make submarines that use the tech that the red October uses

[@asteronx]

As they say, the pieces are starting to fall into place. :)

[@johnnylego807]

What’s the “red october”?

[@andrewreynolds912]

​@@johnnylego807 you never heard of that movie?

[@andrewreynolds912]

​@@johnnylego807 watch it if u haven't already

[@andrewreynolds912]

​@johnnylego807 it's about a typhoon class submarine that has a MHD Propulsion drive that is virtually silent

[@TheDripSpotter]

Not sure if this was meant for the U.K. as all the adds (Gillette etc.) had all African People in it not mostly European People in it so I suppose the products advertised are not available in the U.K.

[@tommith.]

First time i watched it i instantly understood what mhd propulsion is damn i so going to use that in some of my future inventions if i can

[@B2T7RID2QGLEHH5UZFB0T]

I wonder if there are ways to make this more efficient such as by using an isotopic version of these magnetohydrodynamic fluids as well as possibly different magnetohydrodynamic fluids in general as well as potentially magnetic fluids or gasses that are held at their triple points. Metallic hydrogen comes to mind when thinking about these kinds of things

[@user-navigator-ufo]

Всё намного проще, что вам даже не догодатся.

[@B2T7RID2QGLEHH5UZFB0T]

@@user-navigator-ufo I don't speak that language bud

[@johnnylego807]

@@user-navigator-ufoWhat do you mean? Things are simpler? Like something more basic?

[@MrFennmeista]

Is it possible to consider space as perhaps some kind of quantum fluid that may be utilized as a quantum MHD medium. If one were to use , for example, a physics model, outside of the current standard model of physics , which may explain the subspace time continuum field as a type of 'fluid' . One model I can think of is the quantum aetherdynamics model, which you can find online, Edit:I see you've pretty much covered the quantum vacuum subject

[@arinaZamorochka]

Yes. Quantum dynamics. MHD engine created gravity field.

[@mm650]

Would you please consider commenting upon the feasibility of the Zubrin DiPole Drive and it's place relative to ofther ionic wind/MHC style devices for space.

[@Deviation4360]

Someone please further explain how EHD and MHD can be separate. This was not actually explained, and it looks more like you can't have one without the other. Ostensibly you used exactly the same model in your graphic (and it was superbly done) to describe two separate things. For example, an aircraft propeller uses mechanically induced low pressure on its forward surfaces to generate thrust, but also generates a violent spiral of air behind it as a side effect. They are two distinct phenomena but cannot be mutually exclusive in the same scenario. To me you are describing a similar situation and claiming you are only researching the one phenomena, to the exclusion of the other.

[@DennisMathias]

Well, you started off wrong. I hate that. MHD is not an acronym..it is an abbreviation. Come on you guys. There are several problems associated with the development of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) propulsion. One major challenge is the need for extremely high temperatures in order to generate the plasma necessary for MHD propulsion. This requires the use of materials that can withstand high temperatures, which can be expensive and difficult to obtain. Additionally, the complexity of the system makes it difficult to control and stabilize the plasma, which can lead to inefficiencies and reduced performance. There is also a lack of knowledge about the behavior of plasmas in magnetic fields, which makes it difficult to predict the performance of MHD propulsion systems. Finally, the high cost of research and development for MHD propulsion systems can be a major obstacle for many organizations.

[@phineascromwell]

The Dougie Downer Peanut Gallery has spoken...

[@danielash1704]

Pulse strike dynamic spins fluidic capacities in excellerantion glyph in larins

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

Good old Henri Coanda. The man was amazing.

[@MT-THNDR207]

I would love to see a technical breakdown of MHD vs. electrogravitic propulsion.

[@mrbnice7590]

And some real world examples, which I don’t think there are because they only usually demonstrate that when it actually works off paper…

[@MT-THNDR207]

​@@mrbnice7590 Please elaborate if you could.

[@Thin447Line]

Why can't you energize a series of magnetic coils arranged in a line that when energized in succession, the expanding field of one coil pushes on the expanding and dissipating field of the previous one, thus propelling the spacecraft? True field-based propulsion that does not require expelling gases from combusting fuel for thrust. Just thinking outside the box.

[@asteronx]

You can't push off your own magnetic fields, they are still coupled to your vehicle, so everything cancels out.

[@coolboy-qc4eb]

this is how maglev trains work 🤦

[@lord-reaper-blacklagoon]

Well you should have thought inside the box

[@lord-reaper-blacklagoon]

@@coolboy-qc4eb no, maglev trains don't work like this, maglev trains use rails that switch polarity to propel the train and a twisted triangular coil - of sort, to levitate the train. Current is induced into the coil when the train accelerates (ofcourse) levitating it, I know how it levitates but I stuggle to describe it

[@asandax6]

You can push the magnetic field in succession up until the last magnet which won't let go of the magnetic field and thus you won't go anywhere. You'll only succeed in turning the space craft into a giant magnet.

[@chifoltz9023]

If you guys need a nice power source, I can help with that

[@Flagg1]

It would make a perfect energy system

[@Skylancer727]

Funny, electron positron propulsion is the same method used on the SSR Normandy in Mass Effect. Still, I don't see this as a huge game changer as a whole. It may allow a more space centric propulsion system similar to ion thrusters for ground to space transport, but in general it doesn't seem that much vastly better than the VASIMR engine other than tuning. The VASIMR just seems far simpler to run in general. Still, no current space program seems to have intent behind these more experimental propulsion systems outside of NASA, and NASA hasn't really been putting big money behind them yet either.

[@asteronx]

An MHD drive acting on the vacuum fluctuations has the same exhaust velocity and specific impulse as a photon rocket, but with much better thrust. It also needs no propellant, and eventually, no fuel either.

[@clementvining2487]

@@asteronx A MHD acting on the quantum vacuum fluctuations is a q-thruster. And I know you are dealing with matter antimatter in the form of positrons and electrons lowering the amount of propelant. But I really don't think you well ever get the efficiency to the point of not needing any fuel what so ever of both the power system and the propulsion system. That would be papetual motion. Now if we ever figure out how to make a quantum state moderator we could use this to make warp matter like on star trek in the form of depositronnum. Which would be stable extremely high density energy storage. Also this system unless combined with nuclear fusion would be hard to make it work. I really think these system well findly be used as part of a hybrid propulsion systems but not stand alone. Look I know you well allways disagree with me. But while these systems well findly be used they take a lot of power unless you have a way of producing the large scale ionizing like with fusion. And still you need a lot of power for the electric fields and magnetic fields. I can only see one way to make this work. That is with antimatter catalyzed fusion and I am not talking about the positron type reactor you showed before but as a upgrade to fusion we are working on now. Large atom non specific antimatter like anti carbon isotope or something similar is easier to make, slow, cool and store. A factory with a 2 mile track could make 2 grams or more a year solar powered. It would have a 2 mile passive cooling ring also with a attraction mass in a Pendeum trap. And the gaint superconducting magnets are not needed. The new technologies that can be used is only 1-1/2 foot wide. The passive cooling ring and attraction mass in the Pendeum trap allows the antiparticles to slow, cool and form atoms at there own rate. As you know one gram of antimatter produces the 3 times the energy of the atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese. Only miligrams are needed to use as a heat source to replace oxidizer to get a ship to orbit. Only micrograms are needed for antimatter catalyzed fusion. Point is all these systems can be used and inproved as we go but we need the power that antimatter well provide. Offworld it is even easier to make more because of access to more sunlight and high energy particles. It could be a source of revenue for interplanetary colonies.

[@Aaro4ify]

@@clementvining2487 perpetual motion? Not quite that's not exactly what a mhd drive is it only run entirely on electricity.

[@kittyhooch1]

I thought I might learn something. Yes, ion wind is different and a very weak force. Yes the principle of lift is correct. After that it's a lot of advanced physics. Some time ago it was speculated the military had a plane capable of Mach 12 or greater. To be clear there are two critical factors here. First is incredible propulsion. Second is not melting or shredding like toilet paper. This is how it was explained. First, jet engines would take it to low Mach. Second, SCRAM jets would engage to hit around Mach 5. Then it would shoot a current out the front powerful enough to create plasma while at the same time creating a magnetic bubble, basically cavitation in the air. At that time the MHD. would kick in. In particular plasma is positively charged atomic nucleus with the electrons stripped away. It's the fourth state of matter. Being ionized means the molecules are looking for a covalent bond. The energy difference is huge. However escape velocity is 7 miles per second so you need to go fast to get to space unless you have an elevator. Essentially I see no explanation of MHD working in the atmosphere from a standstill. Magnetic drive with rails yes. Additionally your explanation in space fell short. The propulsion you presented, like ion drive is low energy but operates for a longer period, and there is no drag in space. Matter in space is extremely low density gas. Virtual particles would be the result of high energy collisions. MHD needs interacting Magnetic fields and that means either mass or energy. I know people who don't do science probably miss what I pointed out. However MHD is certainly exciting, especially if cavitation can be achieved. Of course if it fails it rips apart like the Challenger.

[@luisarias8077]

The correct propulsion will be magnetic not needing to use ions. Magnetic enough to levitate the ship with enough force to break gravity. Then moving faster will be easier. Using the ship same as a superconductor in a super cold environment. Some alloys levitate in presence of a magnetic filed.

[@danw.7935]

They've been putting ehd lifters in vacuum chambers and some still have thrust... super interesting field that's making some significant breakthroughs

[@gene4094]

After a 25 year career in analytical chemistry, I have devoted a portion of time studying solid state chemistry and other quantum technologies. I had learned that in finding any breakthroughs in novel findings, anomalies are a key. The solution to finding a new source of energy anomaly is a Nobel Prize winning paper on negative refractive indexed meta materials. These synthetic materials refract electromagnetic (EM) waves that have a left handed rotation. Where the natural materials refract the EM waves right handedly. This anomaly separates the energy from the wave vectors. The crux of this anomaly is that this EM wave generates a blue shift or an increase in energy. As an example, an infrared wave is pumped into these materials, the refracted photons will gain energy and become ultraviolet waves. This gain in energy at the nanoscale can be utilized to create a partial water plasma. The same plasma that is in fluorescent lights to lightning. After researching this on Google Scholar open source, I can see a systematic path to accomplishing this. This is complex, but I am confident that it can be done in a university laboratory level setting. This fits into magneto hydrodynamic propulsion systems. As water is in abundance on our planet, it is the perfect fuel. If any reputable corporate entity or governmental is interested in these hypothetical findings, I will share the details. At 75 yo, I just to make our world a better place to live.

[@BienestarMutuo]

You can make a more complete descripción, I don't really understand what your device do. Can be used to split water? You know a novel way to freeze water?

[@gene4094]

@@BienestarMutuo you need to Google the concepts that you don’t understand. The energy created is “plasma”. This is stated in the second paragraph. This post is a condensed discussion on an overlooked source of energy. The details are very complex and need a certain amount of knowledge in Physics and other other scientific disciplines. I just wanted to give the reader a general pathway to systemically peak their interest on this topic.

[@BienestarMutuo]

@@gene4094 Friend, i only see the application of your insight in the development of a low cost source of ultraviolet light for lithography. could be a breakthrought for the nano technology chips, using very low power in comparison to today way to make uv light.

[@adamrussell658]

I dont think you can count on accelerating virtual particles. IIUC they are created in pairs - one positive and one negative. So your lorentz force would accelerate them in opposite directions resulting in a balance.

[@sailingfabule1805]

This was the work of Jean-Pierre Petit and his PhD student Brun in the 70ies. They demonstrated also that with MHD you can nullify the sonic boom in supersonic flights, hence fly supersonic without double bangs. Seems to be used for the B2 bomber, not for sonic reasons but for RF plasma shielding (bending of the RF waves in a plasma) and improve stealthiness.

[@paulkrimmel6384]

B2 Bomber is subsonic thats why it produces no Sonic boom… Supersonic flight produces heat due to compressing the air infront of the plane (forming a shockwave you can hear as a loud boom), which in itself is very bad when designing a stealth bomber since it can be easily shot down by ir guided missiles, at hypersonnic speeds, this shockwave gets so hot, the air surounding the plane turns into plasma on its own. This would light the b2 on a radarscreen like a cristmas tree, since plasma is not capable of bending radiowaves, but is highly reflective to them, this plasma would also produce huge amounts of UV radiation that could be tracked from the ground. You can see the b2 is definetly not a supersonic plane, just by looking at its shape, essentialy the faster you want your plane to go, the longer and narroweer you build it, in short, you optimize it so no part of the plane will ever touch the mach cone produced by the nose of the plane.

[@vec306]

What if all we need is a fast enough cpu to process the data on earth magnetic field and adjust the polarity and strength of magnetics to take flight and propulsion in any direction. Just a thought.

[@oznerriznick2474]

Good question! I thought that too..

[@juan.2438]

Hi from Spain. This is very interesting

[@realityisiamthespoonthefor6735]

The design of the structure to create the magnetic shielding for the fusion exhaust would be interesting to depict.

[@Vito_Tuxedo]

This video talks about MHD "drive" as though it is an existing technology with working prototypes. Where are they? What is the power source? Where are the thrust-to-weight ratio calculations? How does a magnetic field "push" against virtual quantum particles? Are you saying that a macroscopic field somehow interacts with quantum phenomena? How does that work? Please provide sources for real-world, functional implementations of this technology...if such examples actually exist.

[@Flagg1]

What's quantum other then size, do you know

[@Vito_Tuxedo]

@@Flagg1 - I think you probably mean other *_than_* size. If so, start with position and momentum. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states that it is not possible to specify BOTH the momentum (velocity) and the position of a particle with certainty. You can measure either one up to the limits of precision of your measuring equipment, but not both. Also, energy states are quantized. Electrons are constrained to certain quantized energy states within the atom; there is not a continuous range of allowable energy states. But those characteristics are not the context in which "quantum" was mentioned in this video. Rather, it invokes some (presumably) inherent magnetic properties of "virtual quantum particles", which are presumed to pop into (and out of) existence from tne "the quantum vacuum", a minimum, non-zero energy state that is believed to permeate all of space, even in the deep intergalactic vacuum. OK...that's fine, I guess. But what does any of that have to do with a working prototype of MHD propulsion on Planet Earth? It's already well known that MHD will work in space. It has very high specific impulse, which helps to make up for the fact that the thrust stream contains very low mass. That makes it good for very long distance travel, where transit times are long. But the amount of force generated by such thrust is minuscule; it's not enough to levitate a vehicle in a way like what is depicted in this video. Without a working prototype, this is all fiction, and not especially good fiction based on actual science.

[@Flagg1]

@Vito_Tuxedo I would have given you quantifiable & such but it's size. If you take a portion from something no matter how small it is it's still that thing no matter the name you give it, like referring to atoms or even particles & such other. it's purely size relative & when it comes to quantum it's quantifiable, quantitative.

[@Flagg1]

@Vito_Tuxedo sadly what too many have done is taken words that have actual context, meanings, use & applications & changed their original meaning, context & use & applied it to other things outside of their original purposes & such. It's lead way for many to make believe all kinds of things & apply them to things they actually have nothing to do with. It's really made very many people dumb.

[@Flagg1]

@Vito_Tuxedo try this. Can 0 be divided?. Can 0 be subtracted from?. The answer to both questions is: No. however some would have you believe otherwise & have created incorrect methods using mathematics, equations, calculations, etc.

[@cyberneticinterfacemodular3996]

I have designed many applications within saucer and triangle crafts for the military industrial complex and still do today in my job in the aerospace industry.

[@DarkRoastGuy]

I’m taking physics 4B (electromagnetism) next semester. Will I learn about this? Or at least, will I learn about why it works?

[@gergokun7154]

These videos are great but i would also like to have an explanation about why these technologies can not yet be used?

[@asteronx]

They can be, but lack of interest and will has impeded their use.

[@andrewyork3869]

Power draw the scale here is on the high megawatt to low gigawatt.

[@xanderunderwoods3363]

Government suppression. Think how powerful the oil industry is, especially how many wars have been fought over oil. A lot of money is on the line.

[@joereyes8835]

I think otherwise they are being used by the elite and me occasionally.

[@arielhermoso4262]

@@xanderunderwoods3363 Hitler group was experimenting on it, the laboratory was discovered in Poland remote community area- after WW.2.. The Allies and Russian divided for themselves those concerned Hitler scientist after the war- so its not hard to connect the dots- toward those "mysterious flying objects" frequently sighted by many witness.. Those oil moguls was the prime suspect for the tech'gy. suppression.. Maybe, in the 60's decade, the American had already perfected the system..Its status now was a sample of "hibernating tech'gy"- maybe for used in next millenium...

[@kimberlyrobbins4047]

Amazing future. I would like to know where the plasma is coming from?

[@aavalos163]

Fantastic video. How much of this is reality?

[@j.heseklon5168]

Think about what asteronx has provided us here, REAL HOW TO knowledge to easily effectively transport people and goods around the world AND to reach space from an airport or ground based spaceport, or for that matter a personal flying SUV, bus or flying Ferrari if that's what you want. The way I see this, everyday space travel has begun right here and now. Nice! For me I think it's time to financially support these guys, to help them clean, repair and build a better future. Asteronx, let's make this happen. Thank you!

[@clementvining2487]

This is very interesting but the problem is it needs a lot of power. But this combined with space distortion or inertia mass dampening. This would allow this at a lot lower power level. Also if it where powered by antimatter catalyzed fusion it would still work without the inertia mass dampening. Point is this is a good idea but as part of a hybrid propulsion systems not stand alone technology.

[@nerdvision3587]

This is absolutely not how VRIL technology works. Try too using this kind of thing in deep space. It's ridiculous. This is workable for flimsy toys made of paper, foil, and thin wire, and that's about it. Whoever thinks it is workable for any practical useful applications clearly does not understand the physics involved.

[@wafikiri_]

​@@clementvining2487 I'm afraid you've watched or read too much science fiction of the kind wherein fiction much overcomes science. Inertial mass dampening is pseudo-science, pure fiction, not at all anything scientifically real: mass (rest mass) cannot lose or gain any bit of its inertial quality at all, which is always measured by the amount of mass for this reason. Mass (relativistic mass) is increased by kinetic energy, the increase only begins to be appreciably comparable to rest mass when it reaches an appreciable fraction of the speed of light in the vacuum, and is only appreciable by an external observer (frame of reference), not by any observer accompanying the mass. Space distortion: spacetime is bent by the mere presence of mass, causing the phenomenon we call gravity. You need moon-sized mass to get more gravity than what a mere several hundred meters-sized asteroid can provide: thousands of millions of tons, which you cannot take with you in a ship. And there is no such thing as antimatter-catalysed fusion: catalysts are substances that decrease reaction time while not being consumed, or by being regenerated during the said reaction; but antimatter is just the same as matter but with opposed electric charge, and it is immediately and fully consumed when it meets ordinary matter, which suffers the same fate, and the only residue is extremely energetic radiation (gamma rays). It is so difficult to produce that the amount created along several decades cannot reach even a trillionth of a gram, and you would need kilograms or pounds to be of any propulsive use, if the gamma radiation lethality could be avoided. Sorry for exposing real science depressing facts.

[@wafikiri_]

Real how-to knowledge of nearly, if not fully, void viability. Let's compare to a helicopter, its rotors driven by mechanical force. Several tons worth of helicopter. It would have several square metres of rotor blade surfaces, aerodynamically generating lift by spinning several times per second around their axes, thus causing a downwash of many tons of air per second, the blades cutting it at an appreciable fraction of the speed of sound (closer to it at the blade tips). For an AsteronX ship weighting the same, a similar air downwash must be generated, so several square metres of wing surface is needed, as well as comparable air speeds. Neither electrohydrodynamic nor magnetohydrodynamic (nor a combination of both) can be strong enough, acting on remotely ionised air to accelerate it to such speeds, without being comparable to a lightning bolt's, thus one such bolt will most likely form which would choose a random path between the upper and negative electric charge densities, not a carefully-designed laminar flow around the wings. And it all, assuming many tons of air per second can be remotely ionised to the correct electric charge sign. It is science fiction (which, by the way, I love nonetheless) to expect it can be viable. No investors will be found to fund such a contraption, they rely on science-aware counsellors.

[@nil981]

Routine space travel I can definitely see happening in the distant future but flying cars of any kind are a really stupid idea.

[@Phirebirdphoenix]

I actually wasn't thinking about ionic wind until you said something for like a minute and half about it

[@andrewreynolds912]

Please I would like that very much because I think talking about more stuff that is less time consuming would be awesome also I think also seeing more basic stuff besides blender that takes a long time to make like stuff like pictures or basic stuff besides blender is time consuming but I still love the guys who make all this wonderful quality is amazing!! I love it!! Thank you guys for your work

[@asteronx]

Doing any topic in detail takes time, but we have come up with a new production pipeline that will hopefully increase the frequency of our videos. And don't worry about Blender, that's not the time consuming part for us 😉 The long-winded part is writing, recording and editing together the video. Thank you again for your interest and enthusiasm, make sure to check out our website!

[@andrewreynolds912]

@@asteronx thanks I will!!!

[@jo_blueburst]

Nice video 👍The Electric Plasma Jets Propulsion Engine that I have been researching since 2021 will be developed in 2023.

[@Anksh0usRacing]

People think that when I say anti-gravity I’m talking out of my ass but they don’t realize that we’ve been researching MHD since Roswell

[@alanmalcheski8882]

you'd think that but the propulsion system on what they found there is rumored to be something quite different. And there is a third type of propulsion found in ufo designs. I'm not saying anyone knows exactly what landed in Roswell or how it flew, I just know most of what's out there to look at.

[@Anksh0usRacing]

@@alanmalcheski8882 I’m not surprised by that, but MHD was made in an attempt to replicate their technologies. We have found our own human way to do whatever it is they were capable of, albeit not as sophisticated to my knowledge. I’ve been researching this subject extensively for the sole purpose of building my own as I get more experience with craftsmanship and mechanical engineering (math and physics too)

[@georgemichelakis1202]

@@Anksh0usRacing How has the progress been?

[@davidhinds9816]

Thank you so much I found that most interesting and enlightening of understandings in electromagnetic forces and uses of future propellants and powered machine engines etc 😃😊👾especially for use in space it as given me further inspiration. Thank you most kindly for sharing this video.

[@pavelperlik6717]

I had similar idea few years before. Simply ionize particles upper to create lower pressure and discharge them under to create dense preasure. To gain some ionized wind. But its weak. But preasure has force 10 tons on m2. So only 5% of preasure change is enaught. But had better idea. Create machine with superconducting magnets that lock to earth magnetic field. If that machine lock field, then move magnet part downward, at bottom turn of field move part back to top, then turn on push again downward and same again. And you claim like on ladder. Another idea is to lock to sun magnetic field, in right moment it rip of spacecraft from the plannet. But after it you stay still relative to sun so you fall directly to sun. In right moment of stopping you can gaint gravity boost from earth/moon.

[@momohnyaley7069]

@1:53 MHD is not really an acronym. Rather, it's an abbreviation.

[@energ8t]

Ion Wind is the effect or an asymmetric capacitor. The positive being the smaller of the two promotes the flow of electrons toward the larger negative side. The electron transfer pulls the wind with it. The higher the voltage, the faster the flow (obviously).

[@slydesplaylists]

The forces of magnetism does travel through none conductive surfaces provided they don't exceed the field length. Liquids and gases might have troublesome centre of mass to control and just using solid wave cavities might be better stability to create instability upon a craft. Scattering motion and true motion of Kubel like bearings held into position might create low and high pressure differential also.

[@batchosaurus]

finally I have a name to put to my experiments......excellent

[@RickyPonline]

4 Real ??? Tell me bout it.

[@ASeriousBlack]

Whatever system accelerates the fluid forward, wouldn't that same system be accelerated backwards with the same force? How does a propulsion system work without propulsion(even if only ions)?

[@yusefs3550]

Pretty sure I've seen a craft using this type of propulsion. Flew straight down i front of me and was showing off. As it was approaching me it made a very sharp right hand turn and scooted forward a little bit. When it turned, behind it i could see a greenish/touquoise flourecent glow that came out like a trail or some kind of booster.

[@Pavel_Poluian]

There is an interesting design of aircraft, but they rarely talk about it, because this thing is secret. The topic of pulsed plasma thrusters has been developed since the early 60s (see PPT - Pulsed plasma thruster) - they are usually designed for spacecraft. But we will talk about a little-known design - these are plasma propulsion panels for aircraft, where the same Pulsed plasma thruster, but reduced to the size of a pencil and stacked in the form of cells in the panel. The design resembles a conventional plasma TV screen, where there are also discharge cells that activate the glow of pixels on the screen. And plasma propulsion panels have long discharge cells, the arrester has a railgun architecture (just rail contacts or coaxial), and the ionized discharge air is accelerated there by the Lorentz force to enormous speeds - a kind of ramjet engine is obtained. Just imagine! - tens of thousands of small ramjet engines assembled in a panel and firing plasma synchronously with a huge frequency (hundreds of kilohertz). Thus, plasma propulsion panels create lift by pulsed emission of plasma jets from railgun cells. There are tens of thousands of cells in the panel, they shoot at a frequency of hundreds of kilohertz, a huge pulse is obtained, and the plasma swirls the air into toroidal rings - the aircraft is held on this air cushion. Horizontal acceleration is created by the same plasma panels on the sides of the device (they glow, from the side they look like "portholes"). Such devices like "triangle" or "disk" have been observed for a long time, they are mistaken for alien ones - but these are terrestrial devices. They are classified and used for espionage and secret actions. Pulsed electromagnetic technology generates microwave radiation, therefore it is harmful to health. They rarely fly - only military missions. Therefore, they are not suitable for a citizen. This maintained the secrecy. Now they are already declassifying - many people know about this secret technique. When declassified, they will be used for cargo airships. But there is a danger that they are now going to be adapted to deliver small nuclear charges to decision-making centers - such means of delivery are not specified anywhere, are not conventional. This lowers the threshold for starting a war. It would be necessary to declassify them as soon as possible. That's why I'm writing about it. However, I have written before - starting with the book "The Elimination of UFOs" and many articles. There are also videos on my KZbin channel - "Declassified UFO" and "UFO Anatomy".

[@yusefs3550]

@@Pavel_Poluian Thanks for the Information. I live in NC and have talked to others who have been chased by the same craft as I saw but they were driving. Idk if what I saw was terrestrial or not, but it definitely got me interested in UFOs. I'll definitely take a look at your channel.

[@Pavel_Poluian]

@@yusefs3550 Thank you for your understanding and interest. Use an automatic translator.

[@miguelcastaneda7257]

They were working on this back early 60s ...there used to be old black an white videos of it actually lifted off ground problem was power..aircraft worked but had huge power cables hanging from it

[@claudemontezin911]

Still some confusions about MHD and the creation of ionic wind. MHD at a voltage below 30,000V, will create ionic wind (see Jean Louis Naudin's Lifter). TT Brown had to go to France, to gain the support (denied in the US) of a French aeronautical / space agency, to prove that his MHD worked in empty space = the movement upward of a capacitor did NOT merely push on air. Biefeld and TT Brown also demonstrated this, way earlier, in their lab, with asymmetrical capacitors powered inside a vacuum chamber. Their video is found on youtube. They celebrate with champagne at the end. TT Brown named his earlier work as "Electrogravitational" while If you study it, you will find tests made with asymmetrical capacitors (Styrofoam cups wrapped with foil) which moves on the horizontal plane. Since gravity is not affected but vertically, MHD is not affecting gravity. *I would not disassociate Electric force from Magnetic force, as both of these orthogonal forces make up the Lorenz Force. F = q (E + B x v). The experiment is cheap to conduct, using salt water and food dye to visualise the Lorenz force exerted on salt water (fluid). As it works in space, we can wonder what medium does it affect? Photons are the exchange particle in all electric and magnetic phenomenon. Photons are not like baseballs ejected by the Sun. Rather, they comprise the omnipresent medium, earlier called Aether. It could be easily expected that since photons are intimately involved in anything electrical and magnetic, logically, creating electrical and magnetic forces would likely affect photons. Indeed, you can see how rather strong magnets will bend a fire (a plasma).There are false assumptions still in place in regards to the nature of light, photons, and what constitute a magnetic field/ electric field. When we find the true nature and interactions of these. we will no longer be slaves to the Third Newton's Law of motion, ushering a new era of space travel. Cheers!

[@edwardhanson3664]

I knew this is where we need to go and now I have a name for it.

[@emildimofte6538]

BRAVOOOOO,GO,FOR,THE,FUTURE,SPACE,TODAY!!!!!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💙💎🎓👍

[@roberthaugen9871]

It's a fictional submarine propulsion unit from the movie "Hunt for Red October."

[@luclachapelle3499]

By MHD an entire ship can be moved in total vacuum It's the electrical current through the entire ship, crossing at right angle a magnetic field, that makes the atoms want to move in the remaining angle Your right hand's rule ... check for " A primer on the Homopolar Phenomenon "

[@someguyfromafrica5158]

If the magnetic field is generated relative to the ship then the atoms will not move, because a subset of them are generating the field. Its for the same reason that blowing into a sail from inside a boat will not move the boat.

[@af0ulwind115]

Well I tried to listen to all this with an open mind. And what I got out of this is you are trying to build fluctuations of the magnetic spectrum in a variation that reacts with it's soroundings as if they were fluids. You will need some very powerful magnets for that... And a very focused microwave guide form to prevent dispersion. Yes you are still using applied ionic wind... But you are layering it in More reliable stratas, each layer maintaining a polarized membrane between itself and the next due to the various states of the gases and their ion variants. This will be hard to make work until you reach very high Teslas at kilohertz in frequency...

[@BrettTWebb]

Nuclear mercury roden coil is the only way to propel in space 🌌

[@ethanrom22]

The vehicle has to look like a flying saucer so they aren’t aliens they are probably us

[@debdenair2055]

Very nice video

[@DennisSantos]

This reminds me of the Bob Lazar stuff, only he mentions "Gravity projectors" within his alleged flying saucers.

[@cplib2581]

Has anyone that we know of ever created an MHD propulsion device that produced propulsion / thrust in a vacuum?

[@N.E.U.R.O]

Salvatore Pais might know, but yea there's some weird patents and stuff, the head of Lockheed Skunkworks Ben Rich said some really interesting things to his best friend James Goodall before he died in 95

[@ljns5494]

i doubt it will happen. He is talking about a "virtual" particle in space. Notice the word "virtual". A theory never been proven. This MHD propulsion device will only work in the atmosphere at no higher than 22-25 km above sea level. Since the craft still relies on aerodynamics and fluid (air) to fly. Other than that dream on.

[@kenkneram4819]

Fascinating.

[@dscott333]

This is the future.. These theories should have been put to use immediately