Major NEW NASA & SpaceX Moon Landing Update!

Major NEW NASA & SpaceX Moon Landing Update!
Last Video: The Real Reason NASA Is Going Back To Venus!
• The Real Reason NASA I...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: [e-mail]
#Spacex #Space #Mars

[@arubaga]

The next StarShip launch has a good chance to reach orbit. They need to test their new water deluge system in any case.

[@jekster]

I believe they tested it in small scale on a recent engine testing. Not sure of the results.

[@trickeruniverse1979]

@@jeksterit didn’t work, it’s clear in the video that the water coming from the steel plate could not tame the heat and power coming out of the raptor engine. They’re gonna need extra shielding for the steel plate and also more pressure cuz taming the force of the 33 raptors all at once,isn’t really looking like this steel plate thing will work At all. Just my Observation and research

[@michaelfrench3396]

I am literally appalled that NASA fell for Elon musks cons. Starship is never going to go to the moon. Starship is never going to put people in orbit. I guarantee you that the only way we're getting to the moon is if NASA gets off their asses and develops their own landers because SpaceX is not the answer. It is just another one of Elon musk's frauds. Nothing that they have said was going to happen in the time that it was going to happen if it is even happened at all. I mean hell starship was supposed to be on Mars like 3 years ago. It's shit they can't even make a launch facility that can survive. How the hell are they going to get a rocket to the moon? Instead of going with a guy that uses old technology that is already been proven not to either be worth the hassle like vertical landing rockets. You know the thing NASA was doing in the early to mid 90s. I think 93 or 95 and decided that it wasn't worth the effort and the cost to do. And then we can talk about the falcon rocket not really being a quick turnaround launch vehicle. It's also not any cheaper than typical launches nor is any faster. Another two things again that Elon Musk lied about. What he's trying to do with starship and it's launcher was already tried and unsuccessfully, tested over and over by the Soviet Union when they were trying to get to the moon. When they were literally putting the entire GDP of their country and all of their national pride into the space race because they needed to beat the United States. The first stage having 20 plus engines or 10 plus engines has already been proven to be a non-starter. Or a dead end if you will. That's why the Russians never got their lunar program into orbit. But yeah, let's talk about how their launch facilities water distribution system might not work correctly. Think about that. They literally cannot design a system to pump enough water or build a launch pad strong enough to withstand the thrust of their rockets. And those are all super easy engineering problems. It's almost basic arithmetic and then you just spend the money and build things bigger. And if they can't figure those two things out, how the hell are they ever going to get to the moon? I'll tell you what I bet you. We get a starship to the moon the same time that you can hands-free drive a Tesla, and I mean like sleep at the wheel, and be able to drive from California to New York City without getting into an accident. In 2017 with the 15,000 add-on option to his cars. There's a class action lawsuit about that line. I wonder how long until the government opens their eyes?

[@Garryck-1]

Those 33 raptors "shaking the booster apart" is one thing I DON'T think you're going to have to worry about. As the first launch attempt proved, that sucker is TOUGH. Undergoing the gyrations it performed, any other rocket would have torn itself to pieces. Even passing through maxQ almost sideways didn't destroy it.

[@pahtar7189]

Regarding the search for alien civilizations, a dense astronomical neighborhood makes it more likely that a catastrophic event would have annihilated the civilization before it got to the point of sending interstellar signals. Better would be to look 30 or 40 degrees offset from the galactic core, maximizing the number of star systems in the field of view.

[@saltyclampirate7397]

The Starship test flight was a complete success, it wasn't assumed to make orbit. Everyone keeps saying it failed just because it blew up. I would say the damage to the pad was the only "failure" of the flight. I am personally impressed it cleared the tower. They will knock this out of the park. We tend to forget just how successful they've been through the years, just compare them to any other space programs.

[@targetweek47]

The other failure was the rocket not aborting and self destructing as quick as it should have. But I still completely agree with you

[@saltyclampirate7397]

@targetweek47 Yeah, that one could have significant consequences.

[@salland12]

A complete succes? even the FTS didn't work properly not to mention structural problems with the core stage. engines burned their chambers, engines shut down prematurely, failed stage separation. The launchpad is a joke and a complete engineering fail. Don't forget strarship and superheavy were supposed to fly twice a month in 2022.

[@arubaga]

I am looking forward to their new steel based water shower head system. This could be a game changer.

[@donjonjr1]

Yeah it didn't even self-destruct successfully. But the "oh crap" look on Elon's face when the first stage didn't detach just oozes of success. 🙄

[@Jacey2001]

Lol, starship needs to work, nothing else can come close to bringing vast quantities of supplies up there. And its reusable, which means cheap repetition. All the other options are Obsolete, basically 1960s reboots.

[@pahtar7189]

Every other aspect of Artemis are farther behind schedule than Starship, so SpaceX isn't the biggest problem NASA has with the program.

[@saltyclampirate7397]

Great point. I didn't even realize they were behind. Sounds more like they put Elon on Elon time.

[@galadato7425]

Everything is on time with Artemis right now,I'd say spacex is the one delaying Artemis 3

[@ghost307]

NASA'a biggest problem with the whole program is NASA.

[@gravelydon7072]

@@galadato7425 Nothing has orbited around/landed on the Moon that will be needed for Artemis III. Nor is it ready for launch. Artemis II will be the first time that the Orion capsule will be manned and go around the Moon. With as much problems as SLS had just getting off the pad, expect more delays with the NASA side of it. Then you have to get a Rover up there. The Rover is supposed to be there before the humans return to the surface of the Moon. And as far as fuel transfer in space, BO is going to face the same problems as they have now had to eat their words for Artemis 5. And worse, they will be dealing with liquid Hydrogen instead of liquid Methane. So the next thing will be successfully getting a Starship to orbit. Once that is achieved, the HLS will follow rapidly. It already has been proven that Starship is stouter than thought and HLS is basically a modified Starship. With Raptor 3 engines being able to run at higher pressures, you can throttle them back some and still get the same loads to orbit as with a Raptor 2 engine. So look for a change to the Raptor 3 engines soon.

[@ducque696]

Rocket: basically gets detroyed because it's to powerful. SpaceX: MAKE IT MORE POWERFUL!

[@luther0013]

Well when you’re not burning your own money doing it. Why not?

[@Goulmy86]

Correction. The launchpad was to weak

[@nicolasc5432]

@@luther0013 You are wrong in so many ways that makes me cringe of your lack of knowledge and bad judgement.

[@CountryLifestyle2023]

​@Kai A It wasnt government money spent on this.... Do research buddy. 😅😅😂😂

[@billweberx]

@@CountryLifestyle2023 The NASA contract is only $2.9B. SpaceX has spent over $10B on Starship and will spend lots more before they're done.

[@norbiros9336]

I love your videos. I was watching a lot of space-x and space channels, but here I can finally find very good quality updates! Thanks for your work!

[@brandenjones716]

5:17 lol that picture just looks so ridiculously funny.. the lander is like ten times bigger than the space station. Might as well just make a starship luner station that has docking ports so other starships can dock up to it to make bigger starship stations lol,

[@ClipOfTheFail]

You know they're not landing on this mission right it's the next one

[@PowerScissor]

Thank Goodness for SpaceX pushing the pace or NASA would have chosen New Shepard to land on the Moon

[@user-ThomReec8587]

SpaceX might not be ready by 2025, BUT neither will SLS. Artemis 2, SLS's next launch, most likely will not be ready to go until late 2024 or even early 2025

[@stevecam724]

Exactly right. It looks like NASA plans to dump all their failures on SpaceX's doorstep. SLS isn't a stable, proven system and there's some real question marks over sticking humans on the SLS (NASA has killed 19 people and a lot could have been avoided).

[@CountryLifestyle2023]

I think SpaceX has the potential to be rdy by 2025. It is scheduled around December 2025 so that's almost 2.5 years from now. SpaceX can do alot in 2.5 years. Especially if we see 2 more Starship launches this year and they are more successful each time. Than increase the launch attempts in 2024/2025 and complexity of missions. It could be possible for SpaceX. Not a guarantee but possible.

[@ebonaparte3853]

The launch date for Artemis 2 is November 2024.

[@CountryLifestyle2023]

@E Bonaparte Yes that is correct, but the crewed lunar mission is December 2025 and it's Artemis 3

[@chadleeds4169]

No way Artemis will be ready on time, SpaceX has a chance, but should take advantage of the extra time

[@ramodejulio9124]

There are parts there that look like they belong to the lander. SpaceX already has the interior laid out and the elevator, plus the airlock. They are farther along then you realize.

[@TheSyntaxE]

people thinking there will be a human rated starship in this decade are way to optimistic.

[@MH-kj9hh]

For launch from Earth? Sure, I'd give 50/50 odds on having a human rated Starship in the next 6.5 years - for landing on the moon and return to NRHO, there's a vested interest in that happening and NASA is the arbitrator, not the FAA, so a lot of the regulatory hurdles are gone.

[@finscreenname]

Nasa is blaming Space X for them not meeting a deadline is pretty rich.

[@norrislaitinen5011]

If any one can do this, and I mean ANYONE... it's space X.

[@cariyaputta]

The JWST was proposed in 1996, but launched successfully in 2021. I won't surprise if the manned Artemis mission launch in 2045.

[@hoonan1874]

technically artemis mission was proposed in 2012

[@blakeb9964]

I don't think the manned mission will happen until the 2030s. There is so much testing to be done, there's zero chance it happens by 2026. They need test the refueling, then the landing, the reentry, on and on. Then do a test run of everything. Not to mention the testing and perfecting in between each of those steps. Probably 2030s.

[@floydbertagnolli944]

Great stuff!😊

[@markdefelice3700]

NASA STILL NEEDS LUNAR EXCURSION SUITS ! CORRECT !

[@gwynnmccallan8856]

Why don't we build a facility in space that can build ships and stop launching rockets from the planet's surface? Maybe a space elevator could get the equipment up there to build it, or just make everything small and modular so it can go up on smaller rockets. Use the ships to go between planets and the moon. Use smaller landers to ferry people from the surface to the ships.

[@zigzagzarf]

nothing currently could be used to build a space elevator on earth...we have some promising stuff but nothing that can be scaled up to the amount an elevator would need

[@pauljcampbell2997]

I think NASA should be more concerned with getting SLS ready, rather than worry about what problems SpaceX is having. I'd back Elon Musk, with the incredible speed they are working at!

[@user-cs5pr5eb3i]

A couple years of schedule slip is likely. As you say, HLS has many major ground breaking milestones to hit requiring much development, testing and iteration before they are achieved. I do feel strongly that they will succeed. At this point the SLS/Orion system is past the hardest part of it’s development and testing so the risk of delay from this side of things is less. So while we’ve been to the Moon before, the challenge this time around is orders of magnitude more difficult, and of course, that much more rewarding.

[@electrobangs1583]

I believe the Starship will be able to launch for the Artemis 3 mission since SpaceX is known for making rockets in 72 hours.

[@maniakares]

to be fair the auto refuel is gonna be significantly harder to achieve than the automated dragons, since the starship could never be as nimble as the dragon capsule due to its sheer size... but i can guarantee you if SpaceX was at all worried about it they wouldn't be doing it, they would simply find another way. SpaceX is probably the best when it comes to anything space faring related so i have no doubts SpaceX will figure it out and hit the deadline, maybe with a month or two delay but 2025 is not out of the question in my mind

[@maniakares]

And you can quote me on that

[@marymarlow5598]

Some university developed a CO2 scrubber using silver non tubes in a spinning liquid the oxygen leaves as a gas, and the carbon floats to the surface and can be collected off like a cream separator. It doesn't require much voltage to operate the system, and deliver clean O2.

[@pahtar7189]

The only reason they had to destroy the first Super Heavy is that engines were damaged from the disintegration of the launch pad.

[@kb9gkc]

Bingo!

[@trickeruniverse1979]

No, they tried destroying it but the FTS failed to blow it up and it didn’t blow up till 40s later by other means. At lift off, just 3 engines was lost and the remaining 30 could make it to orbit but more and more engines got taken out and even the Hydraulic power unit got destroyed so they couldn’t even steer the ship, they lost control of it after that and just prolonged the flight to see how far it’ll go. Booster 7 is an outdated design and was meant to blow up if anything. It was a failed booster but will undoubtedly give rise to success to her Future brothers and sisters (B9,B10, etc).

[@gravelydon7072]

@@trickeruniverse1979 They had so little faith in Super Heavy Booster #7 that they scrapped #8.

[@LsXnation.WFOArmy]

Wow!! they did this in the 60's an 70's with not even half the technology we have today, I Guess Amazing is the word best describing the feat?

[@cornpowa]

It doesn't help that the FCC and FAA at worst, intentionally slow walk things or at best, seem to have no sense of urgency. If the government truly cared about getting man on the Moon again, they could speed things up for SpaceX.

[@DementedPiXi]

And 3) the first starship was not expected to reach orbit. It was a test of stage 0. The launch mount and tower as they stated multiple multiple times.

[@galadato7425]

It was named starship orbital flight test

[@gravelydon7072]

@@galadato7425 Integrated Test Flight.

[@niftybass]

semantics only: ULA goes by "ULA", rather than "The ULA".

[@jekster]

Absolutely love your content. Would be very interested in a video that goes deeper into how the landing for Starship will work on the moon. I haven't seen any videos that talk about how complex that will be overall to understand and do safely.

[@mrzoinky5999]

One article somewhere said they are working on self-leveling legs (Keep the Starship upright on uneven ground.).

[@billweberx]

You give the BE4 engines too much credit, comparing them to Raptor 2 engines. The Raptor 2 has twice the thrust/weight ratio.

[@tommyb1two3]

Elon stated in an interview that they would launch Starship hundreds of times before even considering having humans onboard. How in the world do they plan on doing that in time for the moon landing? Falcon 9 rocket is approaching 250 launches but it has been launching for over ten years.

[@davidroberts5602]

Hi thanks for a amazing video of the new space race and the space industry glad you put the aliens 👽 in the mixes David 🚀👌✌️❤️🇬🇧👍👽

[@user-kj9no2oz3y]

Nice intro space race

[@danielsee1]

"We" aren't all young. 'We" thought "We" would be on Mars in the 70s.

[@jimshreve83]

How long did we wait for Artemis to lauch when they said that they were ready to go?

[@gravelydon7072]

SLS had to go back to the VAB to fix some of its problems. Starship/Super Heavy were repaired on the OLM. That alone saves turnaround time for launch attempts.

[@techpappee]

I see my quote of what Jim Free actually said was removed. Do a simple search and read what *was* said. Basically that SpaceX has a lot of launches to get it done by the date. That's all, and they do. Heck Orion isn't flight worthy either so...yeah

[@charlieve906]

If the FAA and the bureaucrats would leave SpaceX alone they would get this done

[@raytribble8075]

There should not have been any liquid hydrogen involved with the core stage one static fire test? Did I miss something? As for SpaceX, as long as they are allowed to test and test launch, I believe they can get a “Lunar Lander” into orbit. They can get a regular Starship (upper stage) into orbit… that Earth reentry will be a trick… the highest “bug component” to debug with this launch system one they stop damaging Super Heavy with stage zero debris (sorry, I still believe that impact damage was the root cause of the failure to reach orbit). I also believe the NASA supply delays will be the cause of launch delays with the next Artemis launch… future R25 production may be part of the issue. I hope I am way wrong. In any case, we may have gone to the Moon in 1969, but the safety and risk factors have all changed. In the back of my mind… I wonder how many CCCP cosmonauts were “lost in space” just to get there first and the west never knew about it… another excellent video

[@niftybass]

I'll guess that ULA wanted the rocket to be as heavy as possible so the hold down clamps don't have as much to hold down. Same reason SpaceX did their 33 (31) Raptor static firing at 50% thrust.

[@donjonjr1]

Where did the CCP "get there first"? I don't recall them getting anywhere in space first.

[@raytribble8075]

@@donjonjr1 first man in space Yuri Gagarin

[@_starfiend]

@@donjonjr1 First artificial satelite in space!

[@jeffmentzer9186]

​@@donjonjr1obviously you are lacking on your history lesson!

[@enamsatuu8988]

Amazing.....

[@ltyr-mr2if]

How did they not anticipate the damage from this previous launch? All that damage should not have been "unexpected".

[@gravelydon7072]

They had done a static fire and thought that the pad area would be okay for one launch. Turned out they were wrong. But they already had plans in the works for the deluge system for the second attempt.

[@chriswirges5202]

You've got to get up to speed. We already have visitors stopping by and they've been doing it for quite awhile. Now, we're starting to look for where they came from. Searching the center of our Galaxy is a strange place to start, it's becomes alot more chaotic as you leave our boonies and head inward.

[@joeshmoe4207]

You have no evidence that any extraterrestrial intelligence has ever visited.

[@MrNote-lz7lh]

Do you have a shred of evidence for your nonsense?

[@chriswirges5202]

I don't want to be rude @Mr. Note . It appears some information will be coming out this summer as our government starts to backtrack decades of deception. I also understand your skepticism. It's a lot to take in if you haven't experienced it yourself, but here we are. I'm being open about it because it's the right thing to do. Telling the truth is always appropriate even if you look crazy right?

[@pauldaflyer7879]

NASA, Jim is FOS! SpaceX will be ready!

[@niftybass]

If SpaceX could fly at their own pace--without the EPA, FCC, and FAA bureaucracy--I'd agree. The bureaucracy is out of their control. It'd be handy if NASA and the defense dept would apply pressure to speed up the approval process, but alas...

[@markgood9292]

There's no race about it SpaceX is light-years ahead of NASA on this

[@ianisbell500]

Anyone do an analysis on tethered starships for spin gravity using cables?

[@Musician7831]

This is a great mission. Good to see practice and more info on spacefaring. No Moon base though please unless you can find a cold area that isn't toasty hot. Cos we don't need any practice on a very hot planet well not with humans anyway. Robot base would be ok.

[@redcossack245]

Another great and informative presentation. Thanks!

[@NicholasNerios]

Take that satellite radio, FM is still useful.

[@ghost307]

Any delays in the SpaceX moon lander will be the result of NASA meddling in the design, just like NASA calling for the reduction of seats in the Dragon capsule from 7 to 4...and now they're whining that the Dragon capsule doesn't have enough seats to serve as a rescue vehicle from the ISS.

[@Jam-In-With-Ben]

hi

[@SuperCody1124]

NASA has to blame someone.

[@azne5298]

Can you guys do the new apple tv+ show Silo?

[@ronaldgarrison8478]

4:04 Come on, it's not 18 months, it's about 30 months, and I think it's widely expected to slip a little from that, at least a little. Still, it does indeed appear there's a lot that must happen by then.

[@maniakares]

i love how blue origin is just the offbrand version of SpaceX. its hilarious seeing them fail all the time lol

[@bigdogben]

2:14 Are you implying you think the booster was destroyed because of the thrust from the rocket and not from the FTS system..?

[@DementedPiXi]

Why does your channel apparently have more info than any other SpaceX channel, or the SpaceX info team?

[@hikesystem7721]

I think the Blue Origin lander will be ready first.

[@gravelydon7072]

With BO's track record, I wouldn't count on it even being on time for Artemis V.

[@rickyeates9810]

Is anyone else questioning the design of the Starship Lander? The moon isn't exactly smooth. I'd think it should be short and stout like the Apollo Landers. I think the dam thing is going to topple over.

[@mrzoinky5999]

You mentioned the Artemis 3 crew and showed the Artemis 2 crew

[@genebohannon8820]

Vulcan is disposable. ULA is building last gen rockets. Blue Origin needs to build engines fast enough to keep up with loses. ?

[@grazynazambeanie5963]

At least Kennedy waited till they got a man sixty miles high before setting a date for a moon landing

[@deanminer2340]

The starship will be ready long before artemis two's ready for the moon landing

[@therealjamespickering]

I have a lot more faith in SpaceX's ability to put a lander on the Moon than I have for Jeff Bozos and his Blue Organ.

[@Bobtowngarden]

They also need to test the toilet.

[@jimshreve83]

Elon should make a birthday card with 62 Raptor V3's for Tory's next birthday.

[@aranylaci-1962]

Two Falcon Heavies can do this job easily. Why are not they used for it?

[@SirPeasant]

😂 if you thought the starship was gonna make it to orbit, you weren’t paying attention. They thought it was a 50/50 shot it was gonna blow up on the pad

[@StuartWoodwardJP]

Add 2 or 3 more years for a conservative estimate.

[@DementedPiXi]

Also, Elon tweeted new launch will be in 6-8 weeks. 🙄

[@allenbarrow4904]

Why Congress not pressing Lockheed Skunk Works for use or building the TR-B3 TRIANGE ship instead of chemical rockets. I will listen or watch China's progress with their space program.

[@ricchamen6304]

I reckon ULA would have benefitted Al around by using SpaceX engines would have got them where they needed to be faster as well as keeping them on the gov. No.2 list. Face it the SpaceX engine s continueally prove themselves continually. Whereas blue origin are still trying to achieve successful launch repeatedly. Just makes better sense.

[@Melkur1981]

Even 2026 seems optimistic.

[@jamesbarry1673]

Another 10 years is needed........

[@HoneyBerighthere-Saysarath]

Find the Flag on the Moon.. GPS so everyone can see it with their Telescope.

[@steadysamurai1172]

Got delayed? GOOD more time to get better

[@thesurvivalist.]

He's to use to the legacy aerospace companies taking 12 years, and billions to do anything of worth!

[@bluesteel8376]

The center of the galaxy is not in the habitable zone, so why focus on looking for life there?

[@michellemcsorley9221]

Position prayers .. for safety. Time is not the important, As the safety and a successful. Launch. ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤🦋🦋🦋🦋🦋🌎😊🚀🚀🦋😊

[@TheKlappers]

Here we go, disclosure we never went and never will, sone difficulties being , hmmmmm that pesky firmament!

[@TroyRubert]

I think we are stuck with the public calling it orbital refueling instead the more appropriate orbital refilling.

[@frankmcgowan9457]

Would you explain why one is more appropriate than the other?

[@TroyRubert]

@@frankmcgowan9457 Because SpaceX will be transferring majority oxygen to a ship in orbit.

[@frankmcgowan9457]

@@TroyRubert This is significant because...?

[@TroyRubert]

@@frankmcgowan9457I guess it’s just and ocd thing. You can call it whatever floats your boat.

[@danualbocock1593]

I dont get how they can say that for certain!!. Space X could very well pull it off!!. NASA is no one to be talking about running behind on something any way!!. they need to cut Space X some damn slack!!! Jee- whizz!!.

[@clarencehopkins7832]

Excellent stuff bro

[@pedrosura]

Regarding the search for ET signals… if they are looking for civilizations using 1950s technology, good luck… better spend the time declassifying the information the governmenr has about aliens visiting Earth

[@GarySmith-up1un]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@khanfauji7]

Why not turn the expended SpaceX lander into the moon station.

[@jasons44]

U say he will have no problem to orbit, idk

[@jameswilson4732]

Why can’t they fire up several rockets with all the shit and just put it together in orbit.

[@scottjohnson3666]

The Moon Lander isn't suppose to return.. It won't have the engines to land on Earth and it was said to be a permanent fixture on the moon..

[@waqasali860]

I have one thing for nasa for to easy going to next space but this thing its only 100000 dollers

[@usedcarsokinawa]

And yet, they won’t find aliens for the obvious reason. 😂😂😂

[@jackson2uk]

Added comment below

[@JoseyWales44s]

Let's face it, SpaceX's biggest hurdles to meeting their deadlines aren't really technical but rather government bureaucracy, red-tape and leftist lawsuits.

[@ediekimo9110]

True,... just look at how long it took to get FAA approval for the first test

[@salavatshaymardanov]

@@ediekimo9110 👍

[@Steven_Edwards]

There is a good reason for all of the regulation. Without it you have the small problem of jackasses thinking that they can just launch an ICBM that will spread debris wherever they fail. Without the regulations we would be asking for international incident after international incident. We set the standard others stick to so other countries don't cowboy it themselves.

[@julialasseguarde5798]

"leftist lawsuits" oh jeeze.. get some sun =\

[@cvando1]

@@ediekimo9110 From all the debris flying and the failed abort sequence. SpaceX was lucky no one go hurt. FAA was right to be concerned.

[@donjonjr1]

Well if SpaceX can't get their docket figured out NASA will get us there. One launch = one success 🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

[@MH-kj9hh]

And NASA will land people on the moon how? Sheer will power? There is no NASA lander, even if it takes SpaceX until 2028 to get Starship all the way figured out that is still quicker than NASA could develop a lander starting from scratch right now.

[@jeffmentzer9186]

Another clueless statement dude.

[@gretco1]

Go Tesla woohoo 🖐️ Musk-eteer Elon Musk for King King of the World 🌎🌍 Musk-eteer 🦮 Mars-bound woohoo

[@JCStaling]

Hey, Space Race do you still believe China won the Space Race? I aint gonna let you off the hook on that one until China puts men on the moon before Artemis III. Have a great day, Canadien dude.

[@KimmyJongUn]

TSR on BE-4 delays: THEY ARE WHY VULCAN IS SO DELAYED!! TSR on SpaceX delays: it's normal in the space industry and good that now they'll have enough time to get everything ready 🤓 Fanboy really coming out

[@indi8745]

4:42 “we haven’t spotted any proof of any lunar starships variants…or parts…or anything” I mean, we have spotted a white cone section and a cover for the thrusts midway up the starship for liftoff

[@pauldaflyer7879]

Stop the "won't be ready BS". The space race Bla Bla Bla not for me.

[@charlesspringer4709]

TL:DF another stock footage and poor graphics mashup.

[@BumKnuckle]

Elon Musk will be the biggest reason we don't get back to the moon before China.