This video was created by Anton Orlov to better explain the process of making a daguerreotype. orlovphoto.com/ Filmed by www.justinrichardphoto.com
Пікірлер: 25
@wrextuczivubinomnb4 жыл бұрын
"I could do some Daguerreotype" sees video "nevermind"
@nadined35764 жыл бұрын
"Louis Daguerre was a French painter who created 'Daguerreotypes', a process that gave portraits a sharp reflective style, like a mirror."
@acetylcoa93242 жыл бұрын
LiS
@goldon59094 жыл бұрын
Photos are very precious but the process of making these made them even more precious. 👍👍👏👏
@anthonypearson40567 жыл бұрын
The Daguerreotype was not 'the first photographic technique' (0:06). It was, however, the first commercially viable process.
@antontintype7832Ай бұрын
Maaaaan…. That was a while ago that we made this! I’m still super stoked how that plate turned out, and on the first try too! Hope you still have it :)
@robertcaffrey60973 жыл бұрын
Daguerreotype is truely one of mankinds finest artistic doscoveries it's a pity that so many harmful chemicals are needed to achieve results.
@TheStockwell3 жыл бұрын
There's a method of producing daguerreotypes without mercury using the "Becquerel" variation of the process. However, hard-core daguerreotype makers might think this is like using Auto-Tune. 😐
@robertcaffrey60973 жыл бұрын
@@TheStockwell thanks for that, i'm LOL at the comparison to "auto tune"
@MsCassieCrowe Жыл бұрын
An amazing process. I was just looking through a collection of post mortem photos from the 1800s and early 1900s and most of them are deguerreotypes. I guess in those instances the photographer didn't worry too much about their subject moving during exposure!
@SStupendous Жыл бұрын
Daguerreotypes were hardly used beyond the 1850s, so I'd be very curious to see these photographs? Don't think I've ever seen a Daguerreotype photograph from, say, 1880. We've had instantaneous photography in commercial use by the 1860s, and in ordinary use since the silver gelatin process in 1871. Even photographs labelled "Daguerreotypes" from the 1860s-1900s are not really, just a name used for photographs, a bit like how there's the word "Hoover" used for vaccuum cleaners in certain places, evn when the brand is not Hoover.
@3blackbar340 Жыл бұрын
the egg thing is not a good idea
@thomasmarlega1742 жыл бұрын
Wow!!!!!!
@__kittylovesick97474 жыл бұрын
you're so pretty on this daguerreotype!
@classichealths6 жыл бұрын
well narrative video. It helped me a lot
@SatchelStreams5 жыл бұрын
2:28
@Kenocasta4 жыл бұрын
How expensive is to that nowadays? Can you easily find everything?
@evandrociaccia1064 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I think it's actually quite expensive. Only the camera will cost you more than $800, and all the chemicals are hard and costly to find - unless you already work with them. Overall, the process really takes a lot of experience and time.
@SStupendous Жыл бұрын
@@evandrociaccia106 Wetplate Collodion process is much less cost. Only the silver really that's expensive.
@justicegear855 жыл бұрын
This is awesome! Thanks for the share!
@Dorypowa6 жыл бұрын
that's incredible
@stayrudh13345 жыл бұрын
great!
@jobispapergames55 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed the video. I'm taking Art class for a requirement to my degree and have a new sense of outlook on Art and everything around me. Even the way my kids draw pictures. I am doing a blog for my class assignment on a daguerrotype picture "Portrait of Two Women" and thought I need to know more about this process for me to give an opinion on this picture.. Thank you for your video!