Malik is coming after Donna | Suits

Suits is streaming now on Peacock: www.peacocktv.com?cid=20200101evergreensymyt198&
​Mike and Harvey's power move is countered, putting their backs up against the ropes.
Season 07, Episode 10, Donna
Rachel fears her father's judgment is clouded by the past. Louis aids Alex when his client comes under fire.
Subscribe: / @suits
​
Show Synopsis: "Suits" delves into the fast-paced, high-stakes world of a top Manhattan corporate law firm where hotshot associate Harvey Specter (Gabriel Macht, “Love & Other Drugs”) makes a risky move by hiring Mike Ross (Patrick J. Adams, “Old School”) a brilliant but unmotivated college dropout, as his associate. As he becomes enmeshed in this unfamiliar world, Mike relies heavily on the firm’s best paralegal Rachel (Megan Markle, “Horrible Bosses”) and Harvey's no-nonsense assistant Donna (Sarah Rafferty, “Brothers & Sisters”) to help him serve justice. With a photographic memory and the street smarts of a hustler, Mike proves to be a legal prodigy despite the absence of bonafide legal credentials.
​
#SuitsOfficial #PeacockTV ​
Channel description:​ Welcome to the official Suits KZbin channel: home to all the swagger, smarts and sexiness from Pearson Hardman - one of the top New York law firms that hire solely from Harvard law. Well, almost entirely.
When Mike Ross, a crazy genius whose found himself on a bad path, stumbles into an interview with Harvey Specter he quickly talks his way into a job. You know the rest....
If you want to relive the best moments of Harvey Specter and Jessica Pearson, the funniest Donna scenes, the will they won't they romance of Mike Ross and Rachel.... or if you just want to get LIT UP subscribe to the Suits official KZbin channel.
Google Play & iTunes links​
​
About Peacock: The streaming service from NBCUniversal that’s as free as a bird. Current hits. Timeless classics. Timely updates. Stream Now With Peacock, stream current hits, hundreds of movies, thousands of episodes of TV shows, and exclusive Originals - plus timely news, live sports, WWE, and daily pop culture. Peacock’s got all your faves, including Parks & Rec, Yellowstone, Modern Family, and every episode of The Office.​
​
Get More Peacock: ​
► Follow Peacock on TikTok: / peacocktv ​
► Follow Peacock on Instagram: / peacocktv ​
► Like Peacock on Facebook: / peacocktv ​
► Follow Peacock on Twitter: / peacocktv​

[@arminxvs3372]

Donna being all smug and cocky all the time but chokes EVERY time she gets to court.

[@sid4579]

fr she always thinks she is so much smarter that she is

[@navdeepsinghchauhan7607]

That's close to reality

[@arminxvs3372]

@@navdeepsinghchauhan7607 For regular folks but she has been on that domain for years and decades. You would expect a bit more from an experienced senior as her.

[@dinisgoncalves3744]

In her defense, every time she gets to court mfs are like "you like Harvey 😻😻"

[@arminxvs3372]

@@dinisgoncalves3744 Exactly! And yet she is never prepared for that haha

[@crowmaulerg]

the actor who played malik was insane talented!

[@DoctorJaguarChannel]

Usman Ally.

[@jamesdemile4181]

Agreed man!

[@Augury13]

Yea he made me want to punch him through the screen and I hate violence xD. Need some strong talent to provoke that

[@kadeemgrant4187]

Agreed

[@Barberpreneur]

👌🏽

[@pranksterking1909]

Malik was great actor , maaan the expressions and the dialogue delivery … my favorite part “THATS THE LOOK I CAME HERE TO SEE”

[@DoctorJaguarChannel]

Usman Ally

[@xtehmoonlight7400]

Malik isn't wrong though A ex-waiter/ex-actress work as secretary got fired for destroying evidence and then rehired(with increased salary I believe) and miraculously promoted into a COO because she ask for it For outsider, it doesn't take a genius to think there's something sketchy behind

[@twit9129]

Sketchy or not, it isn't illegal.

[@aisolutionsindia7138]

@@twit9129 its definitely illegal if the promotion wasnt in line with company policies.. and theres no way the firm would be able to attract top talent if they continue going down this line

[@zizzi1227]

Since she destroyed the document and was fired and then rehired and promoted at her own request, I don't think any degree would have convinced the judge. And Malik would have speculated about the relationship between Donna and Harvey anyway, especially since the position of COO is defined in relation to the CEO and the close relationship between the two people.

[@Trust-Yourself-1st]

@@aisolutionsindia7138 Violating company policy is not illegal.

[@aisolutionsindia7138]

@@Trust-Yourself-1st yes it is its a valid basis for lawsuits.. and the company may have to compensate the aggrieved party if proven guilty of violating policies

[@onyekaokonji28]

Mike's side-eye at harvey @ 2:25 mins has me thinking he didn't see the logic in Donna being COO or he was telling Harvey "I told you, we should have prepped Donna"

[@christopherkennedy4076]

I’d argue the latter here

[@mattneal5257]

They are both awful attorneys - prepping a witness is basic preparation for trial

[@solangevinces]

Sad to say but Malik was right. I always thought Donna was a great secretary, she should’ve stayed like that. Her promotion was so forced.

[@cesarg2768]

She became the worst part of the show

[@zizzi1227]

The writers built Malik's attack on Donna and made it seem righteous based on the fact that there are many types of COOs, some of which require business licenses. The rest depends on the type of company and the job description. Her duties did not require business degrees or law studies

[@ganthc]

@@zizzi1227 please list premiere firms that have COOs without MBAs, or a long track record of management promotions to justify the position. I won’t hold my breath. Donna was capable of doing the job, but she wasn’t qualified. It’s why Malik’s attack stung so bad.

[@Elisa-gn5nj]

@@ganthc Are you saying that her promotion was illegal?

[@ganthc]

@@Elisa-gn5nj nope. Just that she wasn't qualified for the position. Companies can do whatever they want with hiring, but it's a massive joke to say that a premiere law firm in NYC would promote a long time secretary to COO overnight without some progression in leadership, minus having advanced degrees. For example, if Donna had spent a few years being Director of Personnel, then getting the COO job, that might have worked. There are real life examples of people that were secretaries that worked their way up to an executive role. Carly Fiorina is one. However, Donna had no advanced degree, and no progression of work experience to qualify her for the position.

[@jessicalee7504]

This Malik dude is a great actor

[@mactire6045]

I mean, he was alright.

[@samhart4205]

Yikes. Harvey brain stops working around Donna 😅

[@izzyizzy241]

this is true

[@pramilsapkota325]

😂😂

[@seancallaghan54]

In actual court this would be days of objection and the prosecutor would be reprimanded

[@ajg8722]

Right?! So argumentative and inflammatory.

[@geraldk1931]

The way he got straight into business @ 1:40 was terrifying 😂😂😂

[@fernandof.bompard5388]

The issue regarding the obstruction of justice, specifically the allegation that Donna destroyed evidence, was entirely unconstitutional and illegal. The evidence in question was not pertinent to this case but was associated with another criminal case. It should be noted that Donna has not been found guilty in that case. Furthermore, the document in question was not affiliated with Coastal Motors but was a counterfeit document linked to an unrelated third party. Given these circumstances, Harvey's objection should have been upheld by the judge. However, if the objection had been overruled, as it indeed was, any accusation against Donna in court would grant her the right to invoke the Fifth Amendment, allowing her to abstain from answering any questions related to this matter.

[@cuplishcupid5509]

Oh.

[@imogene2044]

Agree

[@ElectroDFW]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't believe the 5th applies in a motion hearing. Only at an actual trial.

[@fernandof.bompard5388]

@@ElectroDFW A testimony is a form of evidence that can be introduced in Court by a witness, but, in this case, Malik is not taking Donna's statement as a witness about the hearing's subject, he is, in fact, accusing her of a crime. That's when our 5th amendment rights kick in, because a person cannot be forced into pleading guilty before the Court.

[@fernandof.bompard5388]

@@ElectroDFW also, Malik is using a very tricky strategy, he is applying the witness duty to tell the truth and to not mislead the Court, this would be considered perjury, to, in fact, speculate and get a forced confession of crime to destroy her character's reputation. Although, any criminal attorney should know the difference between witness's law and Constitutional rights, Harvey is potrayed as a succesful attorney, but he did not realize this simple tricky tatic.

[@lawrencecobb2107]

“Objection!” “ANSWER THE QUESTION”

[@izzyizzy241]

Having experienced the previous trial, Harvey was afraid of Louis' questions and Donna's answers. Although she insisted they easily gave up on the mock trial to protect their own feelings

[@GuitarHeroRocks99]

So why did the judge not respond to any of their objections to the incredibly inappropriate and unrelated questions he was asking Donna?

[@flopus7]

The writers: judges can just ignore objections right?

[@anthonyiuculano6002]

Donna should have pleaded the Fifth.

[@club6525]

If I were Donna, I would've argued that the acting position of COO draws a parallel to that of a programmer. Although programmers generally develop an advanced skillset through a computer science degree, a skillset developed by oneself is sufficient given that the skills the person possesses does not render the person incapable of their job duties.

[@mattneal5257]

Harvey loses his temper while telling Mike that he can handle it proves Mike’s point

[@memnoch22]

Now THATS a cliff hanger!

[@yinhuili]

They should've prepare her. Even if her chance to be up there is small, they should've prep her.

[@solidmoon8266]

While Malik might've been right on some things. He crossed so many lines and broke so many laws that the few things he might have been right about pale in comparison.

[@RhiannonFan]

Great acting by Sarah Rafferty - playing Donna

[@kwasibruce]

Law is brutal.

[@kennethjoseph9309]

What does he have against Harvey? He would've done the same thing.

[@donnamuir4689]

It's a TV show. I love the drama.

[@zizzi1227]

I think Louis' first question was if Donna slept with Harvey. and I really don't know what would have been more terrible: to answer this question in front of the firm or Malik's attack in court

[@jaybell1390]

Malik handing out advise like DIY belts.

[@latinguy67]

I love Harvey!

[@markfcoble]

I beat an attorney named Malik. He was new foreclosure attorney. Real chump.

[@user-cu8zf5ln1i]

Malik was always correct in saying from an external view in almost any other case Donna’s promotion was BS. Donna was the exception, she had like 15 years with the firm at that point, and spent much of that time helping and having an ear in pretty much every aspect of the firm. She was self-trained to be a match for any standard qualified coo and everyone in the firm knew it.

[@VDA19]

Wouldn't Donna be protected by the Fifth Amendment from the question on whether she destroyed that document? If it's illegal, she has the right to not self-incriminate. Harvey, Mike and the Judge should've immediately been on it.

[@ganthc]

No, because like Harvey said, the file was a fake and destroying fake evidence is not a crime. The question is fair as to whether she destroyed the file though, because his main objective was to have the article admitted about the memo, and to explain the absence of the memo with Donna's promotion. He didn't actually ask her if she destroyed the memo, just made her look sketchy on the stand. If he really wanted to get her in trouble, he could have questioned her about impersonating a federal agent to steal evidence in a lawsuit. My guess is that she would have folded like a cheap suit at that questioning, much like she did in Mike's trial.

[@ilina84107]

@@ganthc I think Donna had no way out of this situation because The COO is generally a position created to complement the existing CEO. The CEO chooses his COO because, apart from the conditions necessary to fulfill the job, there must be trust, respect, connection between the two and, according to some studies, even chemistry. Exactly the relationship the writers created between Donna and Harvey. So Malik would have twisted the questions anyway to conclude that Harvey promoted her because she slept with him or destroyed documents at his request.

[@awaisanwar104]

Donna was a great secretary, but you can tell by her lack of confidence that she clearly isn't fit to be COO.

[@matthewruss]

I know its just a story line but judge is poor. Every grounds for every objection and malik bullies the witness yet judge allows it

[@clairereynolds8583]

The judge is secretly a gossip hound. His curiosity got the better of him. (jk)

[@carloscenteno6540]

Mike and Harvey are lethal

[@woundstosagacity1102]

was watching this episode

[@teniola9304]

Andrew Malik can't go toe to toe with Jessica

[@oldnite3414]

Judge Ward is everything wrong with the legal system in real life

[@Matthew-oq1hx]

😂😂Malik made fun of her

[@maxgee22]

malik malik malik, jealousy gets you nowhere

[@Vishnuk-fe9iv]

Aww you poor simp. Malik owned her.

[@tonita88]

That judge was there for the drama.

[@Jm29q]

Although Malik was on point with his questions, the judge was the worst at this situation.

[@Vishnuk-fe9iv]

Do you hate when a Man calls out the bs of a woman.

[@MystiqWisdom]

lol, the judge here is terrible.

[@simone3633]

It is sad that Malik managed to make it seem like he is right

[@MRSA01]

OBJECTION: Testifying + Badgering + Inflammatory

[@hothotheat3000]

He’s right.

[@goatxual]

yep the third video of this clip just with a different name for the video

[@karlbrundage7472]

Wow. I had no idea that there were such machinations out there in the world. Back here, anything like this would be resolved with someone kneeling in front of a ditch.

[@carwashslayer4235]

4:10 Very interesting

[@Elisa-gn5nj]

I feel bad for her. Humiliated by Malik in front of a room full of people and disappointed by the two friends she always supported and who avoided preparing her no matter how much she insisted.

[@johanhoyos2318]

i dont feel sorry, as much as we like Donna, its evident she wasnt qualified to be COO and anyone couldve question it since she does not have an MBA to support her claim, it looks suspicious under any circumstances, she shouldve known from the beggining people were going to judge her

[@Elisa-gn5nj]

@@johanhoyos2318 She was wrongly accused. None of the accusations were true and MBA is not mandatory either. The employer decides the terms of employment in according to the needs of the company, and his promotion did not violate the law. Malik manipulated the court and made everything seem true in order to admit the false evidence.

[@thatonenoob7854]

@@Elisa-gn5nj She destroyed evidence. It might have not been real but she didn't know that. She had the intent to do it which questions her ethics. And she clearly is being favored over other employees. She's a Secretary and got promoted to Partner then demoted and promoted to COO. This all came because she asked for it.

[@Elisa-gn5nj]

@@thatonenoob7854 Donna destroyed the ticket, but not at Harvey's request. And he didn't promote her to destroy documents or sleep with him, as Malik implied. I don't think she was favored because there was no one else like her. She was the only one in whom he had full confidence, with whom he communicated without reservations, he considered her essential for the company and for his work. They were a team where she did what Harvey didn't want or didn't like.

[@twit9129]

@@thatonenoob7854 she's favored because she deserved it. She was the only person who knew how Harvey functions to the point where he couldn't physically and mentally get work done without her. She's smart, incredibly smart, she knows everything almost Sherlock levels of intellect, if that doesn't make her deserving of being favored then idk what else. She may be 'unqualified' in terms of traditional education but she has enough experience and intellect to qualify for the job so idk what's wrong.

[@jackieo7113]

ooooohhhh!!!! What episode was that?!

[@Well_be_right_back]

Season 7 episode 10

[@maliaaa6703]

why its ok that he will risk everything for her and want pepole stop everything help him and tell them to do what he say to save her but when it comes to mike and rachel he said no and alot off pepole comes to him and ask him again and again more then ones He wasnt care about mike love life oy his

[@artemisog8082]

2:51

[@JoeyP946]

yea uhh lawyers can't testify like that instead of asking questions.

[@theguythatsezsomethingreal9183]

I wonder ....why did this awesome show end??......Can anyone tell me please?

[@michael245]

it finished was 9 seasons long it completed its story

[@mynames7664]

because it fell off a cliff when Mike left.

[@gmartinz01]

Attorneys don't wear suit jackets in their offices

[@flopus7]

What kind of judge allows this kind of cross?

[@jessicaiglesias298]

Malik always making it worse with fake evidences and a smart mouth

[@Matthew-oq1hx]

Andwer the question

[@Supr93]

What you borrow

[@juandiegovela6318]

I dont understand why they say "ill wrap it" up and its all ok with testifying, it makes no sense

[@mcscruse-iz6vl]

Court scenes ate bogus, no lawyer can ramble on with no objections.. Smh

[@michaelmancini5773]

The judge was very prejudicial and biased , the witness was being harassed , and the judge let it continue , bad scene

[@DraxXThanos]

why do they have to win every case though.

[@harryjones295]

Malik was going at harvey and donna was suppose be professionnal but he made it way way personal and he wanted Harvey disbarred and I like the fact Harvey made him lose his license and put him I prison.

[@ChickenJoe12]

2:23 I love when Donna realizes saying “I’m Donna” isn’t an answer to what your qualifications are in the _real_ world

[@deadsoul2065]

she for the streets

[@rustyrocket8765]

I rooted for Malik here, the cocky trio Dona, Harvey and Mike deserved what they got, but of course the shady tactics by Harvey, as always pay off…

[@AlezanDeer]

A prosecutor, a public official eviscerating a witness to create false evidence and you talk about Harvey's shady tactics?

[@suellenpaulino6398]

O Thiago ventura véi

[@OAC1997]

Donna is overrated

[@mattneal5257]

They went to trial after having the case for a WEEK? Hahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahhaa’

[@humairaahmed6979]

Malik is asking for attention . That’s what it looks like 🧐😜🤪😝🤓

[@m.ahmed.y1723]

No it does not

[@z1az285]

No, actually he is spot on and frankly I love what he did here

[@justafanfave228]

@@z1az285Not really!! She didn’t sleep her way to the top. Mike isn’t more qualified than her for his position but y’all are not batting an eye. This whole cross was inflammatory and no judge would allow it.

[@z1az285]

@@justafanfave228 She didn't ofc but Malik isn't wrong . Yes, Mike wasn't qualified for his role either but he had an incredible memory which she did not. She was efficient as a legal secretary but was out of her depth in the new role

[@mia989-ms5vo]

​@@z1az285She didn't have a photographic memory, but she had emotional intelligence and a whole set of social skills that made her well suited to managing people. Her duties (if you saw them from the show) had nothing to do with the law. And what Malik does is revolting because he eviscerates a witness to fabricate evidence.

[@christiankarlkarganilla2763]

I wasn't rooting for Malik to win but seeing someone expose and verbally beat Donna down will always leave a smile to my face. She is just the worsttttt

[@aperson1248iejeon]

Real

[@saix4raw8]

This Title should have been *"Malik is Coming After Harvey"* or Alternative title *"Malik is Coming After Everyone"* cuz he is literally going after Everyone Harvey Cares about.

[@user-cq1qh9if1t]

Malik knows about mike

[@ApoorvSrivastava31jan]

In whole Suits universe Donna Char Arc was the most stupidest , I guess it was suppose to be Mike who was to be named partner but he left in the middle it was Donna.

[@Hoops_head]

Dudes really trashing Donna in the comments. Unbelievable.

[@antonymburu5376]

This wasn't in the series

[@EclipseGameplay]

you’re right this is from better call saul

[@eXtendedmusicHD]

thought it was in Dragonball Z

[@RooKangaRoo]

POV: You’re watching the WowWowWubzy season finale

[@J.P_343]

Looks like The Incredible Hulk to me

[@funeralgiggle3771]

😂

[@ddduva4440]

Malik 💩💩💩💩💩

[@CindyF1]

Had to stop watching when Donna got Promoted. All I seen her as was a secretary.

[@JamesJoyce12]

Donna getting a bit puffy by season 7 - while the two dudes still looking lean and mean

[@elisam.2896]

And yet she still got Harvey, too bad for you!

[@christopherhonkomp3051]

Your point?

[@TheRealFoop]

Human beings do not talk and act like this. Hard to stop watching anyways.

[@OnTourWithPattiSmith]

That Malik actor is a closeted homosexual, right? 🔰

[@Dionysos-]

He is muslim

[@OnTourWithPattiSmith]

@@Dionysos- So you’re saying he’s a Muslim closeted homosexual, right?

[@Dionysos-]

@@OnTourWithPattiSmith No. Acting on homosexuality is a sin in Islam.

[@OnTourWithPattiSmith]

@@Dionysos- So you are claiming that absolutely no one who is Muslim is a homosexual?? Wow, that is as detached from reality as say no catholic priests are pedophiles.

[@jeannguyen3199]

Does this actor ever play anyone not punchable?

[@enismusliu3568]

did harvey just call malike the n word ??

[@younes6458]

Donna is probably the most annoying character in tv history