LEGO Star Wars T-6 JEDI SHUTTLE COMPARISON! (7931 vs 75362 | 2011 vs 2023)

I never thought I'd see a remake of the LEGO Star Wars 7931 Jedi T-6 Shuttle but with the Ahsoka show LEGO Star Wars has created the 75362 Ahsoka Tano's T-6 Jedi Shuttle and while it's smaller, it's got a better design, easier to use play functions, and a shockingly good Minifigure line-up.
- - - - - - - - - -
Join Whatnot & get $15 off your first purchase! (Affiliate) - whatnot.com/in...
Buy NEW & OFFICIAL LEGO sets from ZAVVI & save 10% with CODE MandR10 - tidd.ly/3EBV7qd
Business Inquiries - [e-mail]
Fan E-mail - [e-mail]
mandrshop.com/
Best of MandRproductions: • Best of MandRproductions
- - - - - - - - - -
#LEGOStarWars #LEGO #StarWars

[@CanadaBricks]

The cockpit undoubtedly took the biggest hit in the downsizing of the new set. Feels a little sad to only squeeze one fig in compared to almost 3 on the old one

[@Daddy-Hundavar]

Hello there again I really do see you everywhere

[@Yurio]

Definitely, especially considering this is a shuttle

[@TiagoDdA]

But the size looks more accurate I'm the small version

[@ZoomerUnion]

​@@TiagoDdAit's not. This is a fairly large ship. About five times larger than an X-wing in universe.

[@ShizzySupra]

The Bad Batch “shuttle” was super small but still managed to fit 4 figures plus gear and was $80… being blinded by the figures in this Ahsoka set, its not a great set…

[@michellerahe4853]

I love and miss the OG clone wars line. Just seeing the old clone wars sets is kinda nostalgic now. I miss when they paid more attention to that series. But maybe that's just me

[@berenwelter8835]

Yeah same here

[@elephant_stone82]

🥲🥲🥹

[@spargsyrebooted]

Yo be fair, the reason they paid so much attention to TCW is because it was the only new Star Wars thing at the time. Now we have all these D+ shows to make sets for. Couldn’t just be Clone Wars forever aha.

[@michellerahe4853]

@@spargsyrebooted ik haha. Just sucks

[@Gabe0mazing]

​@spargsyrebooted and we are getting a $650 UCS Venator in a month so I don't think it's been completely forgotten

[@stannypk5k9]

I think the downsized cockpit is a deal breaker for me. Major issue, and it really gives the ship a "small-scale" vibe. The immersion is broken, so to speak. Even though overall the new ship's design is nicer and the storage is good, the 1-minifigure space for the cockpit is just plain bad/inaccurate. This lack of space in the ships is a terrible trend recently - from Boba Fett's ship to this. What happened to creativity, like the one used for design of Razor Crest or Transport Scythe? I'd rather this ship to be $30-$40 more expensive but nail the interior space. It would be perfect then.

[@brennanhickey9156]

100% see where your are coming from here, but I will say with the scale they went the small cockpit does look good and a bigger cockpit wouldn’t look right. That being said I agree they should have made a bigger set entirely so more figures could fit in a larger scaled cockpit.

[@ShizzySupra]

@@brennanhickey9156 scale is arbitrary… they could have scaled it up or down however they wanted. It could have gone Mando Gauntlet design and had two figures fit length wise too.

[@hbtdawgz1688]

Ahsoka show version of the T-6 features an extra engine and that rear turret. The Clone Wars and Rebels models didn’t have that. I like the new one’s body shaping more, the old one is super simple and round looking. I like the angles of the new one. A bigger cockpit would need a bigger set, the next appropriate cockpit would be one like the Falcon uses. And I think they’d have to scale up the wings and body for it to not look too funny.

[@wit-grizzly2423]

i like the red and grey because it looks more realistic, i mean these ships fly tru space and land on various planets. they will get dirty and gritty and the color will degrade so i think the grey is better then white.

[@JadenWeeks]

ive been waiting for this video for MONTHS! FINALLY!

[@ceepally]

The new one has better detailed figures, and I like that the center has some good bulk. The old one has it seems more correct colors, and it is larger. Not to mention that they used red on both sides for the old one. I still think I prefer the 2023

[@hbtdawgz1688]

The wings on the old one really are only meant to be seen from the top. The red panels on the underside are only there to accent the top side and give it a red trim around the edge from the top view. The bottom view of the old one is pretty bad. I wish they’d done like the Mandalorian fighter and paneled the bottom of the new one.

[@cpafol]

They're smaller. They're always...smaller 😕 inflation works both ways I guess 😪

[@eitak12334]

wow this is an excellent video. camera work, script, and content were all top notch. good stuff

[@johndabot1804]

I think if they kept the size the same and made even the slightest attempt to color-match the underside of the ship to the front side than that $80 price point would make perfect sense.

[@jbawesome5640]

Love the comparisons man! Another daily upload let’s go!!!!!!

[@Skycoat]

Maybe I'm alone in this but I honestly prefer flick fire over stud shooters. Ideally I prefer a designed weapon over either but I understand that playability is an important feature. I personally feel that most sets incorporated flick fires into the design of sets in a more visually pleasing way than most stud shooters.

[@ilyavekselman9341]

It's really hard to choose in that competition, because both models have their own good sides.

[@randomandology]

"...Spinning is a good trick..." should've seen that line coming lol

[@marcusphokou935]

I think this is a great review. Some might disagree with the conclusions but they are clearly a matter of opinion. Even if you disagree with them, there is loads of information here to help you draw up your own. And there is no filler viewing the box from very angle or flicking through lots of instruction pages.

[@Zoobels]

8:13 the two slope pieces on the 2023 version behind the cockpit are backwards

[@crazydog1750]

10:40 They SET it apart from the old one? 😂😂😂 Nice, Ryan.

[@Darkstar-qb3dh]

i remember when the old set came out and i miss those sets id happily buy both for $80

[@jettrooper101]

I struggle to love sets that are meant to be much bigger and hold much more people but don't. Biggest offender recently was the imperial shuttle, whole point of the shuttle is to hold dozens of people, yet this one crammed in 3, just barely. Same but less of an issue here because this ship really should fit more minifigs. Still like it, just can't love it.

[@viperson9818]

3 is the bare minimum for a super down scaled sized but only 1 that’s just straight up a star fighter.

[@mrsnipergaming7323]

when are you making more hoth moc videos

[@Daddy-Hundavar]

It dead😢 (Nah idk)

[@silentone3357]

i'd love to see a MOC instructions where the end result has best of both worlds(in that case ships).

[@TheRealSuperDred]

I'd like to see an ultimate collectors edition of Ashoka 's T-6.

[@ICECAPPEDSKY]

I honestly might end up modifying the new Shuttle because I personally just cannot stand the look of the new downsized cockpit. I think it’s the cockpit piece they used that just looks choppy/janky. The cockpit on the 2011 T6 is just built way smoother and rounded than the new one that looks more awkward and square with weird ledges. I just really wish that the designers played with the new ones cockpit more. The rest of the 2023 shuttle does look to be an improvement over the 2011 version especially when it comes to the middle fuselage construction.

[@JenovaCake]

Hell yeah i was waiting for comparisons of this upcoming wave

[@spencersholden]

Well I need to find all the pieces to my OG T-6 set. Younger me thought it would be great to destroy it.

[@kylescanlon9167]

Can’t for someone to create instructions Tom make a bigger cockpit for the new T6

[@majorastorm]

How is the set with fewer pieces is both bigger and has more room in the cockpit?

[@JangoSkett]

Bro I also did not think lego would re visit this ship but hey here we are

[@briancohen7967]

My Lego collection is exclusively SW:The Clone Wars, so I'll stick with my 2011 T6 Shuttle, but I *really* want that Huyang minifig. 😩

[@EinfachNoah]

saving money by not printing the box art on the instructions is such a cheap move

[@platypusponderings1378]

Great review. Can’t wait to get this one. Thanks 😊

[@brickmanusa]

Sweet video!🔥

[@davidboyd4026]

Great video and comparison 😊

[@Ed.Arthur]

Agreed 🍻 smaller pieces to inflate the numbers is sad butt, a reality now

[@JoeMama-nu4st]

I know republic gunships go online for 180 so why don’t you do a review on one I know hello there Rex has one maybe you could get his

[@Superagent666]

I watch MandR set reviews to justify my pre-orders that I made rashly 😅 glad this one'll be good!

[@TheBrickGuy909]

plz do a ghost comparison

[@CloneCommanderCrater1102]

People keep saying that the new T-6 is massively downscaled next to the old one, but just looking at the top-down comparison, they really aren't that different in size. The new one is only a tiny bit smaller than the old one in its overall size. The only thing that's really truly smaller than the old one is the cockpit, but granted, the old cockpit was oversized on the old model compared to the proportions of the actual ship.

[@andybricks576]

Might have to open my 1st T-6 shuttle from but i will be getting the new set as I love the figs. Is the new cockpit print meant to be white but looks grey due to a poor print? Herer in New Zealand we paid $130 for the 1st set and $140 for the new 2nd set.

[@yoda5167]

Dang didn’t realize just how small the new one is until I see it next to the old one

[@leg0liver194]

I really miss a flight mode display option. Like on the box art, T-6 looks much more interesting in this position, and waste less space on shelf. Excactly the same case with the B-Wing model.

[@SelvesteSand]

The UCS B-wing does have a stand for flight mode display. And the T-6 can be displayed in a non-horisontal wing position as if in flight, although it needs its landing gear out for balancing. But of course vertical position is difficult to achieve... The T-19, however, truly can only be displayed in landing position. :/

[@DalleDC]

The design of the booklets has changed to save on ink. Personally I think that is fine.

[@DominicTriolo]

Hi

[@DonkeyKong374]

They still have numbers on sticker sheets. Lego always has numbers for every thing

[@zerofriends515]

I have a 75012 sealed set mint box any idea how much do this go now?

[@panterman6231]

Looks cool the new one does, To small the cockpit is -yoda The last jedi

[@EstevanSandoval-st7gm]

A lot of people prefer the old over the new but I like the new one more but kinda sad that you can only fit 1 mini figure in the cockpit

[@brysonjohnwakefield9181]

Ask MNR should I get the t6 shuttle or the gunship. I'm toen because there both great sets and I don't have an older version of either. Thanks

[@gavmiller6154]

I was really thinking about getting this set but then I saw the bottom and instantly knew I wasn’t going to buy it

[@macilaci92]

No point in discussing now but the updated instructions look much better than the old one

[@omarbaba9892]

Bro how? They replaced some really cool art with their new crappy renders

[@c.jonahabbott2831]

What’s sad to me is that the new one’s cockpit COULD have still been big enough for two. If they had used the V-wing cockpit piece or similar, it would have afforded slightly more space without screwing up the proportions completely.

[@reklss9620]

Price per piece is important because I personally prefer having a longer build experience and it's a big part of the set for me.

[@thetoemater1877]

flick fire missle> stud shooter and spring loaded missle

[@legohivemind]

If anyone wants to make a full scale T-6 shuttle there’s a great moc on rebrickable

[@randomandology]

The 2023 shuttle cockpit is not just smaller, but also smaller relative to it's shuttle

[@brysonjohnwakefield9181]

When you making a gunship review

[@MandRproductions]

Tomorrow. LAN is mov ing embargo dates when I get sets now....

[@brysonjohnwakefield9181]

@@MandRproductions thanks

[@jonathancoleman9062]

I don’t really see this downsizing as a problem, especially since Lego's piece molds have improved over time to give us sleeker looking builds. Inflation is tragic of course, and I do personally wish the coloring had remained the same, but we are still getting some banger minifigs. And for people who complain about lack of play features, just remember that Lego has a very broad age range. This is for adult displays as much as it is for kids to swoosh around. All in all though, good set, hyped for the show.

[@J-146]

0:41 is there any reason they do this? It just sounds like they’re shooting themselves in the foot for no reason 😂

[@Vic-Valentine]

i guess im in the minority when it comes to missing the old style of lightsaber blades, looked way better than the frosted imo

[@piggyguy3674]

They gotta rerelease all the old sets for a nostalgia wave or something

[@Rottenlego]

Unexpected turn out on this one.

[@MonkeyDWarfare]

The only reason I probably won’t buy this is because of the wings at the bittom

[@Forty-K]

im so mad i dismantled my t6 shuttle when i was 6, biggest regret of my life

[@PEPSIMaxMusic]

I feel like I'm the only one who liked flick fire missiles 😭

[@2Horrible]

crazy how the old one is bigger with less pieces.

[@Svesh_Inertia]

I really dont like that both sides of the wings arent decorated

[@Exemption6]

my brother has the older one and ill get the newer one

[@huntercollins3901]

am i the only one, tho dislikes stud shooters in all capacities. flick fire missiles were usually incorporated better, easier to aim, and most importantly, easier to find when fired

[@trentoninnewjersey]

Unfortunately flick fire missiles weren’t good as projectiles

[@davidnobre5660]

I prefer the older lightsaber blades

[@SoelTheFemenby]

wouldn't have bought this set for 80$ got it for 55$ on sale

[@merafirewing6591]

The 2011 one is the true goat.

[@Zoobels]

Clouded your vision is, blinded by nostalgia you are

[@xtentasticx]

What I hate about Lego is so many ships that have interiors are downsized to single pilot interiors 😢

[@espguitarz1]

​@@IntergalacticDustBunnywhy would the collector still support things like that to happen? Collectors are the worst. It's making all our set smallers. Thanks to collectors dumbness by feeding them so they can keep doing shitty products.

[@gelatinguy]

@@espguitarz1 I don't think this is the case. As mentioned above, the main reason is the shelf display tends to be most important for builders, and without making the ship to minifig scale (neither T-6 is minifig scale), they chose to shrink the cockpit/interior so the exterior looks nice. With a ship of that scale, you can't have both a minifig scale interior and proportional exterior. You have to choose. The only solution to this, of course, is to have a full model, which is why the more famous ships (like Luke's X-Wing) have a smaller playset ship and the full minifig scale ship. It may not be what you want, but that's the reality of the scale they are marketing toward. Or do you want all the sets to either be larger interiors with bad proportions, or do you want them to be 3x as expensive to be full minifig scale?

[@Rievax17]

@@gelatinguyyeah exactly. With this ship I don’t think you could even get to minifig scale without going full UCS, and even then Lego isn’t strong enough as a material to both incorporate the interior and look good on the outside at that sizd

[@gelatinguy]

@@Rievax17 One thing I'd like to see Lego do more often is to "Polly Pocket" a ship, which is what I call it when the interior doesn't match the exterior, but it's a fun playset inside. So make the outside look like a nice ship, then crack open the ship like a clam shell and have the interior be the cockpit or whatever is most interesting.

[@Nightwizard63]

That box size difference is wild

[@justinmcare814]

Well everyone keeps buying these sets no matter how overpriced they've been so it's no wonder the new sets are always noticeably worse in ways that make zero sense.

[@caidenstudios6881]

He’s still pumpin out peak content every day Honestly I think each set is equally good in their own ways Keep it up Ryan!

[@kstudioz8871]

Lego really should've added a extra stud to make it a rounded 600 pieces! 😅

[@darthjarjar911]

I prefer the original clone wars shuttle with the 4 jedi but the new one still looks great

[@HumbleTrooper]

I honestly prefer the rigid wing spin motion, it is really hard to get the Ahsoka shuttle to stay in one position, and the wing lock on the old one solves this issue perfectly

[@AlessTricer]

The 2011 Jedi Shuttle can spin just as well as the 2023, just by moving ahead that little piece that creates the friction.

[@Vor1ki]

That’s not what lego intended though. I do prefer the more froction though

[@WhyDaRumGone]

@@Vor1ki same.

[@genappithy]

For $80 I’d want them to address the under side of the wings. It’s otherwise a great looking model. Might wait to see if I ends up on sale.

[@tompatchak8706]

I hear that. I was all excited to get one, then saw the bland as shit under carriage. I’ll wait

[@EriJ100]

Same, I was thinking it would be neat to display this ship in "flight mode" with the wings vertical like we see most of the time on screen. But lego ignoring the underwings basically kill that option.

[@kanjiklubskywalker4951]

i actually prefer the simpler design of the older model. it's way more clean and displayable, plus the new one has so many tiny little pieces that create a cluttered look

[@MB-vg7uu]

For the record: u can indeed fit all four figs in there 😮‍💨

[@fritz404]

I kind of liked the new one before but man it's so much worse than the original. Maybe the next UCS set will be an Ahsoka t6 shuttle!

[@Mr.HeisenbergTheCook]

I'd say the chance of Lego making an UCS T6-shuttle is below 1% 😄

[@pandurial]

I like the new one better because the old one js had an UGH cockpit(it was oversized)

[@Iceman._]

Thanks for the comparison. Never got the old one but I'm excited to get the new one. $80 is a great value for this set. I can see any or all of these minifigures being valuable years in the future. Getting this on sale for an investment seems like a good idea. Best ashoka minifig ever, remake of a classic rebels character, first ever version of a clone wars character, and a mysterious character whose revealed identity could increase its value. Seems like a win especially on sale.

[@estebanlabulle649]

the underbelly does really matter if u want to display while it's spinning or somthing. I like the vertical look

[@Brave_Sir_Robin]

I agree the newer one is objectively a better set but that white and red color scheme just looks so clean.

[@hbtdawgz1688]

I think it is a decent visual distinction between the eras. A clean Jedi Order era shuttle vs an older modded one post-Empire. They definitely designed it to look junkier in Ahsoka than it did in the animated shows.

[@kinglew0773]

Lego does do more detail now. But they are inconsistent. They will give us an incredibly detailed Boba Fett in a $15 set but give characters like Commander Fox a blatantly inaccurate print in a $140 set, or not give Rex a waistcape in a $600 set

[@colewagner6623]

I’m a really big fan of the dark grey and red of the new one. It just looks so modern and satisfying. To bad it’s just a little to small, banger mini figs tho.

[@RandoMan07]

This is a perfect example of shrinkflation. It has more pieces and costs more but is smaller. Lego uses TONS of small pices to achieve detail that I'd rather have done with stickers. There's also thr cockpit. The new one looks like something somebody would actually sut in but the old one was bigger and when it comes to toys, bigger is better.

[@Legofan18688]

Celui de 2011 est un des premier set que j’ai eu donc je l’aime particulièrement

[@ZackMuffinMan]

I still have my 2011 one and I will be getting this one!!

[@viperson9818]

The one thing I can say for sure about the two T-6 is that the builds are heavily limited due to their price point. Which makes me wonder ships like the Justifier gets $170 while a big ship like the T-6 is reduced to a star fighter sized set.

[@rattlynanimations7694]

I do wish they added detail to the underside of the wings. I would normally display it on the ceiling to make it look like its actively flying, however its more difficult where the ome side is too bland. I may just hang it on my wall instead

[@Piastowicc]

I prefer the new one but the old set is still very nice.

[@juliowalker6380]

We’re definitely in the era of downsizing starting from the downsized tie fighter

[@areiosbleidd5139]

Old seems more accurate on what we see in the media, i think also new one is overly detailed, i love bigger cockpit, and engines in old one looks better too. Minifigures wise i love both, but details in new one are way better and amazing! So old ship with new crew ;)

[@Wingspan_5]

I actually like the older lightsaber blades better. Maybe it's just nostalgia but if they didn't have bubbles I think they'd be perfect.

[@herewegoagain...]

The 2023 T-6 has a double layered win: they could have "simply" flipped that layer to make it less horrendous on the underside. Huge miss, but to be expected at the price point, as making such a flip stable would be more involved.

[@brysonjohnwakefield9181]

Ask MNR. Do you think that we'll get a captain Rex in a less expensive set next year, and what set do you think that would be I think Rex's bomber would be awesome. Keep up the amazing work!

[@pickledotaku]

I 100% prefer flick missiles over studs. Personally I like the look of flick fire missiles and they’re nice to play with, you can’t lose them because they don’t shoot far and they can be used for other builds. Stud shooters look ugly and they’re a pain to play with because they get lost easily, can’t do much with green studs.

[@SelvesteSand]

Agree. I don't like the flick-fire function either, but it's better than stud shooters. They're less easily activated on accident and don't get lost as easily. When I play, not that I do it often anymore, but even when I was a child, if I'm firing a missile, I want to have the missile in my hand so I can guide its path and savor every second of its slow-motion flight, then control its impact. Swooshability doesn't only apply to ships. I remember some Hoth battle set from probably 15-20 years ago where you could press somewhere and send a minifigure flying as if being blown away by an explosion, and I wondered if anyone would actually find that fun compared to just picking up the minifigure and acting out his being-blown-away manually, even wondered if the adults designing it had forgotten how to play. Even back then, I remember picking up on -- and being bothered by -- a move towards automatisation. Jango's Slave I had missiles sitting on studs so that you would take them off manually and "swoosh" with them. That was great. Now it's all stud shooters everywhere.