Marc Tessier-Lavigne: Stanford President resigned

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Thank you for watching. Comments are welcomed and encouraged - what do you think? I heart comments I have seen, and reply to those KZbin notifies me off. FEEDBACK: - Questionable history spelling error 5:46 - Academic spelling error 9:04 KEY COMMENTS:

[@stanleyklein524]

I attended both Harvard and Stanford. Your videos make my sense of pride in attendance a sense of dismay.

[@lalaboss4146]

Good research and presentation, Binge watching your channel!

[@StephenGloss]

what is image/language duplication in regards to manipulation?

[@richardpentelow5111]

Questionable history @ 5:46. Academic @ 9:04. May be others. Edward Tufte wrote a wonderful book - The Visual Display of Quantitive Information, if I have the title right. This applies more to your other efforts perhaps, but your graphics are really what he would call “Chart Junk”.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Thank you for the feedback. I have added it in the pinned comment. "Chart Junk" I am curious about.

[@richardpentelow5111]

@@Danny.Hatcher Tufte needs a comeback, if he ever went away. If you want to see something brilliant, search for “Tufte March on Moscow”. The graphic covers Napoleons march on, and retreat from Moscow. No flashing images, no ludicrous irrelevant activity, but facts. A voiceover is not needed, it is all there, an unfolding disaster. It works as a single image, although of course you have to stop and think.

[@stanleyklein524]

Always the underlings who (are forced to) take credit for flaws in the primary investigator's publications. Pathetic.

[@triforce42]

I'm binging yoru channel. And I think this video certainly is much less... polished. I think your channel has gone in the right direction. I would have preferred separating the video into two sections mainly Fact and mainly Opinion. You also don't need to give too much opinion - focusing on the facts, acknowledging potential biases, etc are all in the right direction. You don't have to provide a proposed solution - you can just say, "this problem needs more discussion by experts and interested parties."

[@richardpentelow5111]

Poor spelling. Too much time spent on the graphics perhaps.

[@Danny.Hatcher]

Thanks for the feedback. Could you point out the spelling errors. Some must have slipped through peer review.