Marcel Duchamp - Anemic Cinema

[@elektraboogie]

I've been looking for this, thank you!

[@aplacetobe6008]

duchamp is THE ARTIST.

[@nichelodeonband]

Nichelodeon's first promo is called "Cinemanemico", an homage to a genius

[@defo89]

I believe it is to express it, communication of ideas, has to do more with design as an independent discipline, wich uses art as a tool.

[@almanacofsleep]

@republikanin the work is intended for the veiwer to bring his own experiences when creating an interpration, not try to discover the "message". It doesn't describle anything it simply is an open work.

[@Raccord]

For me it's to express a FEELING, not necesarily an IDEA as a concept. Of course that sometimes that becomes an idea, then a concept, etc. Thats just me, though!

[@BananeHammond]

Mental Spiral for Silence

[@Capitel]

How did he do it? I mean, are tgey combinations of a single device?

[@yellville]

Funny you should mention Lang (whom I love, and perhaps appreciate more than I do Duchamp, though I don't think the two bear comparison). The wheel aesthetic actually reminds me very much of Lang. However, just because the two artists are from the same time period doesn't mean it makes sense for the quality of their pieces to be compared broadly and generally.

[@QuantumBunk]

Esquivons les echymoses des esquimaux aux mots exquis. Dodge the bruises of Eskimos with exquisite words.

[@Zarraman]

me too

[@TigerRocket]

Your assumption seems to be that because one cannot think of something now that someone in the future wont either. Concepts and creativity are not limited to the present or the past or any one individual. There is nothing about thoughts or ideas that preclude future possibilities simply because one cannot think of them. There was a time when much of what we take for granted simply wasn't so, ideas and concepts included.

[@soniccage]

"Matte painting Speed painting in photoshop" stick to that

[@QuantumBunk]

Bains de gros the pour grains de beaute sans trop de bengue. Baths for the large moles with little Bengue.

[@intigfx]

just some cardboard disks rotated with an engine.

[@halogenburn]

I don't know. Not because I don't know, but because for some reason it won't load. My point is that you're not an art critic. You're on youtube for gods sake. And spewing vocab doesn't mean you understand Duchamp.

[@Evandvh]

For me this couldn't be easier to understand(not a jibe, the simplest approach is the best-its easiest to understand it as having no meaning, and it doesn't ). Its surrealist and anti narrative. The words don't make any sense.. The swirling draws you in to try derive some meaning from it but then takes it away by presenting you with gibberish. Its trying to take us away from the limits of narrative a present us with something boundless and limitless..so its meaning is its lack of meaning!