Marcia Clark talks about the O.J. Simpson Trial ( May 18, 1997 )

Рет қаралды 122,869

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 774

@sharonjones2775 4 жыл бұрын

I love Marcia Clark and I don’t think she’s racist but she is talking in so much code. I love her either way as she is very objective. I still do admire her. In fact, I think she should run for office.

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJibpKhvnKiqetk Here is who you admire

@GAURAV25855ify Жыл бұрын

Hell no the Karen in power what office there are enough problems in the world already

@GAURAV25855ify Жыл бұрын

She is a double standard bitch I hate people like that. Her marriage failed along with her career if she couldn’t convict OJ simpson squeeze the juice Moreover run her household what makes you think she can tun for office

@jerryyang3516 Жыл бұрын

Nobody likes losers. She's a loser and resigned asap to publish her book and cash in.

@johnnyjack1552 8 жыл бұрын

If you think Fuhrman planted the glove Than you must think Fuhrman planted the Bruno Magli shoes on OJ Feet

@csdr0 8 жыл бұрын

Johnny Jack, how do you suppose OJ planted that glove instead? consider the evidence (adversarial testimonies of witnesses) that the Defense was able to extract from Prosecution witnesses and also from their own witnesses 1. Mark Fuhrman (MF) brought his coat with him at Bundy. 2. MF was issued and had with him plastic bag to preserve evidence. 3. The picture showing him pointing to the left glove was actually taken 4:30 a.m. of June 13 but the same policemen who reported seeing only one glove at the crime scens and MF testified that the picture was taken at about 7:00 a.m. So they lied about it and for good reason. 4. MF was ordered to hand-over the responsibility of the crime scene to two detectives: Lang and Vannater. 5. MF volunteered to bring the two Lead Detectives to OJ's residence. 6, MF had encountered OJ before and wrote a report against him related to the wife battering of Nicole. 7. MF was the one who climb the wall of OJ and opened the closed gate for the two detectives to enter OJ's residence without a search warrant. 8. MF and the two detectives told the court they went inside OJ's residence to determine whether OJ was safe as there was an indication that he too might be hurt on account of the speck of blood discovered by Brad Roberts and MF on the Bronco. They lied.. 9. MF went his way alone to go to the alleyway and allegedly found the bloody right hand glove. 10. MF told the court that the right hand glove was still moist with blood when he saw it. If it was dropped by OJ at 10:45 pm of June 12, 1004, it should have been fully dried by the time MF found it at about 6;30 am of June 13, 1994. 11. MF told the court he never used the n-word for the last 10 years. He was caught lying by the tapes and by the testimonies of Defense witnesses who testified he is a genocidal racist who plants evidence against blacks. 12. The leaves surrounding the right hand glove were not disturbed. This is inconsistent with the right glove dropping to the ground. 13. There were no blood drops around the right hand glove when there should have been as the Prosecution says the bloody glove was dropped. 14. There were no blood drops from OJ in the alleyway when the Prosecution claims OJ was cut at Bundy in his struggle with either Ron or Nicole. 15. The underbelly hair of the dog Kato was found attached to the right hand glove. The hair can only be attached if the dog is lying down the ground and the detached hair is on the ground to be attached to the right hand glove. The hair could not be attached while the killer is wearing the glove and touching the underbelly of the dog. This means the right hand glove came from the Bundy crime scene and was taken and then planted at OJ's residence. 16. The right hand glove has hair of a Caucasian male. 17. During cross examination of F.Lee Bailey, MF slipped and called the gloves "them." In fairness MF clarified by calling the left hand glove and the nit cap "them" and not the two pairs of glove. But doubt has been instilled in the minds of the jurors. What inference can best explain the facts? There's only two possibilities presented in court and these are the only two options that the Jury can considered. 1. MF planted it? This is the allegation of the Defense. MF and the policemen lied about the time the photo was taken 7:00 am instead of 4:30 am & is material to the credibility of MF and the policemen who reported seeing only one glove at Bundy crime scene. Their false report gave the strong impression that MF went to Rockingham first before going to Bundy and thus it would not have been possible for him to discover the right hand glove at Bundy and then take it to Rockingham. This lie shatters the PRESUMPTION OF REGULARITY usually enjoyed by police officers reporting faithfully what they observed.. MF is a genocidal racist who hated blacks and called them the n-word and had a history of planting evidence against blacks married to a white woman. This was established by the Fuhrman tapes. MF's confessions of planting evidence against accused blacks is relevant to this case. MF found two gloves at Bundy, he then took the right hand glove and placed it inside a plastic bag and hide it in his coat. This explains why the right glove was still wet with blood. The right hand glove picked up the dog's underbelly hair while the glove is lying on the ground at Bundy. MF took the opportunity to investigate Kato's observation and went to the area where Kato heard a noise - the "thump, thump, thump" sound. MF put out the right had glove from the plastic bag and put it gently down and this explains why the surrounding leaves were not bothered and the blood did not splatter on the surrounding. 2. OJ planted it? This is the allegation of the Prosecution. a. According to one version by the Prosecution, OJ walked outside the perimeter wall of his residence to avoid the Limo Driver Alan from seeing him going to the alleyway. OJ was carrying the right hand glove with his hand and climbed the tall wall and the fence on top of it without injuring himself. No blood drops along the pathway and no blood stains on the fence despite OJ carrying the bloody glove with his hand. OJ dropped the right glove on his way down and stepped on the air-conditioning unit while on his way to the alleyway side door. No blood drops found in the area. It's difficult to explain the 3 thumps if OJ stepped on the air-conditioning unit. It should have damaged the unit. OJ then entered his house through the back door located at the alleyway. Throughout this time OJ's cut fingers stopped bleeding but resumed bleeding when he was on his way to get something from the Bronco without either Kato and Alan noticing it. No blood drops were found inside the Limo. b. The other version of the Prosecution is that OJ entered the Rockingham Gate and proceeded to the alleyway without being seen by Limo Driver Alan Park despite the opened headlight of his Limo directly illuminating the garage area. OJ then bumped his head on the air-conditioning 3 straight times causing the "thump thump thump" sound heard by Kato. He dropped the bloody right hand glove which he was carrying with his hand. Despite this OJ had no head bruish or injury. He went back to the driveway and he was on his way to the entrance door of his house when he was seen by Alan Park about 6 ft away from the entrance door. On both versions of the Prosecution, it is impossible to explain why the blood on the right hand glove was still wet and not fully dried up when allegedly it was exposed to the atmosphere for nearly 7 hours when the expert witness for both sides agreed it would take 5 5minutes toa maximum of 3 hours for blood to be fully dried up. The Prosecution theories will not also explain why there were no blood stains and no signs of disturbed leaves around the glove when it was supposedly dropped accidentally by OJ. Lastly, they could also not explain why no blood drops came out of OJ's cut finger at the alleyway. CONCLUSION: By using an inductive method called ABDUCTION (INFERENCE TO THE BEST EXPLANATION) or the method of Sherlock Holmes Method ("If we eliminate the impossible whatever remains however improbable must be the truth") we can determine the facts behind these evidence - MF planted the bloody right hand glove in OJ's residence! This puts the lie in MF testimony. This conclusion is reach by following the law through the Jury Instruction: "A witness who is willfully false in one material part of his or her testimony, is to be distrusted in others. You may reject the whole testimony of a witness who has willfully testified falsely as to a material point. Unless, from all the evidence, you believe the probability of truth favors his or her testimony and other particulars." As shown in the above explanation the evidence makes it highly probable that the truth favors the Defense Theory and the willful lies of MF and the policemen discredits both the testimony of MF that he found the bloody right hand glove at OJ's residence and the testimony of policemen who reported seeing only the left hand glove at the Bundy crime scene. The Jury following the Jury Instruction correctly rejected the whole testimony of MF on his discovery of the bloody right hand glove at OJ's residence.

@ikediamond 7 жыл бұрын

Johnny Jack and you must think OJ is a wizard, ninja, and The Flash

@ikediamond 7 жыл бұрын

This.plastic chick should thank OJ for that 4 million advance!

@nnnnnnnnnnoooooooo 5 жыл бұрын

@@csdr0 Why are you so stupid ? your mom carried for 9 months dummmmmmmmy

@ZACHTARK 5 жыл бұрын

You mean he didn't plant the shoes to. Hell I thought he staged the murders to and Nicole and Ron are still alive

@BloggerMusicMan 2 жыл бұрын

I can see why she was such a successful prosecutor. She's a great communicator.

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJibpKhvnKiqetk Marcia communicating

@jasongibbs3713 2 жыл бұрын

You mean a great liar, making claims she can't prove. Just like at the trial

@Michael-iw3ek Жыл бұрын

I know, right? She put the killer OJ Simpson away for good, didn't she?

@breskeno1 Жыл бұрын

exactly!! she is a liar,a manipulator, a whiner, and likes to hear herself talk@@jasongibbs3713

@paulsdancing5429 Жыл бұрын

@BloggerMusicMan...yes, but her memory was worth a sh..t and she could not add. She had OJ at Bundy and at Rockingham at the same time, 10:45 pm...Zombie logic and the same applies to her's Moroonish fans.

@Tocametalheart 7 жыл бұрын

It is impossible to argue with conspiracy theorists. Anyone who has the time to write a 20 paragraph comment on KZbin trying to defend a obvious murderer cannot be taken seriously.

@donovans6472 5 жыл бұрын

what takes more effort writing 20 paragraphs or two sentences....at least he's making an effort to think for himself....most of you anti O.J people are just going along with the guilty narrative and not even taking time to actually think for yourself.

@steveevans424 5 жыл бұрын

Actually 2 sentences is the sign of a kook ( see Your mirror )

@melisentiapheiffer3034 2 жыл бұрын

@@donovans6472 truth!

@strnglhld 2 жыл бұрын

@@donovans6472 I would have voted not guilty since the defense didn’t prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, but OJ absolutely did it.

@donovans6472 2 жыл бұрын

@@strnglhld let's pretend you were the eye in the sky that night. now tell me how he killed both of them....and what caused him to do it....was it planned all along or did he just have nothing better to do that night....... forget about the case and evidence for now . Let me hear your thoughts to know why you believe he's the sole murderer b of the two

@robgeorgia8801 4 жыл бұрын

Chris Darden said the same thing in his first book. They both knew that they were going to lose the case before the trial even started because of the choices they had to make from a jury pool that they knew would never convict Simpson.

@strnglhld 2 жыл бұрын

I have to wonder why they stuck with the idea that black female jurors would convict OJ even after their own studies told them otherwise.

@alexscott730 2 жыл бұрын

The entire prosecution team were incompetant fools.I could have proven OJ guilty 1 week into the trial and i'm not even a lawyer ffs.

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

They picked the jurors

@tew-dawg9671 Жыл бұрын

@@lynndragoman2454 from a pool downtown. After it got moved. The game of strategy was one from the get go by the defense.

@Jeromemayle Жыл бұрын

@@lynndragoman2454 Exactly.

@jodiefinney5072 6 жыл бұрын

I dont care what people say about her, I view Marcia Clark as a strong, capable incredibly smart attorney who happens to also be female. She tried many many murder cases before this one and never lost one; until OJ. There wasn't anything she could have done differently that would have brought a different verdict. The so called jury could have viewed Simpson committing the murders with their own eyes and still would have acquitted. I dont believe the verdict was based on race...I believe it was because it was celebrity. He was a handsome, charming, likable HERO. To white people as well as black. They let a killer walk away. Too bad.

@ronaldjackson8126 5 жыл бұрын

I love her after watching this.

@dakotail 5 жыл бұрын

You are sooooo CORRECT!! ,,,, excellent comment! ~~

@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын

@John Smith whats your point? Sex while prosecuting a case clouds the mind? Maybe lack of or no sex would be worse?

@mikeh7220 5 жыл бұрын

She was incompetent as fuck. So was Darden

@jasongibbs3713 2 жыл бұрын

She was incompetent, did a terrible job, and got destroyed. She tried to cover up police misconduct, and is here making racist claims that cannot be proven true, instead of taking accountability for getting demolished by better lawyers. That's not a great show of strength. The case she presented was full of wholes and ultimately didn't add up. You can't expect jurors to overlook this with a man's life on the line. She has limited ability, and no integrity

@nyujay2010 8 жыл бұрын

I hate the way the moderator slaps his lips when speaking! AAAAAAARRRRGHH!

@SS-cc2cv 7 жыл бұрын

Global Jay SAME

@bp2352 4 жыл бұрын

I had to shut it off because of it 3 min in

@TheClash122 9 ай бұрын

So awful.

@MrBlack292 7 ай бұрын

That guy is an absolute loser. The lip smacking and bringing up everything bad that happened to her. Never let that man speak again.

@zaneycatug 3 ай бұрын

Maybe it's a tic

@cutiepie4041 7 жыл бұрын

Beautiful and intelligent woman.

@mariogiresi6792 5 жыл бұрын

Cutie Pie She was dealt a bad hand. She was considered the villain during the trial and then after the acquittal, suddenly, she was the idiot who let OJ get away. She did the best job anyone could have done with all that racial bullshit going on at the time. I put the blame on the media for pounding the word “racism” every day during that trial into the ears of the American public.

@isacece1334 5 жыл бұрын

I love listening to her talk...so smart!

@Mk6GTIMike 4 жыл бұрын

To each their own. She fumbled what was an easy walk in TD.

@dixiedeed4918 3 жыл бұрын

@@mariogiresi6792 She could not handle Barry Scheck,,Nufled or Cochran, you said ahe was amart, she was not that amart

@dixiedeed4918 3 жыл бұрын

Blood money

@brotherjay6301 5 жыл бұрын

This should have been part of her closing argument

@nolaguy1408 4 жыл бұрын

LOL Lady just said that folks could play Clue all day, a conviction wasn't going to happen.

@interstategar 2 жыл бұрын

That's ridiculous. That would have been an insult to the jurors, many of whom were minorities.

@jerryyang3516 Жыл бұрын

It is her own closing argument lol. Never to practice as a prosecutor ever again.

@Tom-lv2mv 7 ай бұрын

@@interstategardo not you get it? that jury was plain stupid

@GlorifiedTruth 5 ай бұрын

@@Tom-lv2mv IT HUUURRRTS

@brad4110 3 жыл бұрын

People can say what they want about her but look at what she was up against, the best group of lawyers money could buy and one of the biggest stars at the time.

@alexscott730 2 жыл бұрын

That doesn't excuse the 3000 idiotic things she chose to go ahead and do.Incompetant decisions that allowed a woman bashing socio/psychopathis mulriple murdering parasite to walk free....She has ZERO balls and took ZERO risks in that trial ..and she had a history of incompetancy before the OJ trial.

@cathleenmurphy4836 Жыл бұрын

It was never allowed to be about the DNA or huge amounts of evidence PROVING GUILT. It was made to be about RACE.

@michaelbarlow6610 Жыл бұрын

@brad4110. "The best group of lawyers money could buy"??????😂😂😂😂😂😂😂!!!! You obviously were not paying attention to what the late Vincent T. Bugliosi accurately stated about Simpson's so-called "Dream Team" - the Simpson case was only the second murder trial that Simpson's lead attorney Johnny Cochran ever tried in his legal career - the first one being the Geronimo Pratt case which Cochrane lost! Cochrane was known primarily as a civil case defense attorney not a criminal case defense attorney! Robert Shapiro was known primarily as a lawyer who negotiated plea bargains for his clients, rarely, if ever, fighting out a case to a verdict! F. Lee Bailey, although a famous criminal defense attorney most famously known for defending Dr. Sam Sheppard, lost his last big case prior to the Simpson case - the Patricia Hearst case - a case that many legal experts regarded as winnable! Alan Dershowitz was an appellate lawyer - not a trial lawyer - hired by Simpson in case Simpson was convicted! Robert Kardashian was hired by Simpson to be on his defense team in order to keep him off the witness stand to prevent him from revealing on the witness stand what he knew about Simpson and any incriminating statements made to Kardashian by Simpson! The only outstanding, "best in their field" lawyers that Simpson hired for his defense team were the two DNA lawyers, Barry Scheck and Peter Newfeld and although those 2 lawyers can deny it all they want, the reality is that they trashed the DNA technology in that trial - technology that they utilized under the "Innocence Project" - a project devoted to getting new trials ordered for convicted criminals who may have been wrongly convicted and which DNA evidence might exonerate. As Bugliosi accurately stated to TV talk show host and actor Charles Groden, "just to show how intellectually honest and conceptually pristine the 'Innocence Project' is, Scheck and Newfeld criticized the DNA evidence in the Simpson case when they knew that that evidence proved Simpson's guilt"! Obviously, like the mainstream news media who laughably labeled Simpson's defense team, "The Dream Team", you suffer from the all too-human affliction of seeing what you expect to see and not what is really there in front of your eyes in terms of events and trends in society! Or as Bugliosi accurately stated about the mainstream news media, the news media, "can invariably be counted upon to do only a modicum of analytical thinking", or as Bugliosi accurately stated, "the greater part of humanity only hears the music, not the lyrics of events"!

@miguelvelez5669 Жыл бұрын

I disagree on that. Remember the prosecutor has unlimited resources. Not like the defendant.

@jerryyang3516 Жыл бұрын

She was up against her own ego. Undefeated until the o.j. case. Resigned and published this book to cash in

@jeandixson5610 4 жыл бұрын

Marcia is a very strong lady most would have buckled under the stress of this thing

@alexscott730 2 жыл бұрын

Her entire prosecution was one gigantic buckle that let a murdering piece of self centered garbage walk free after butchering 2 people for no other reason that subserving OJ's agenda.

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJibpKhvnKiqetk Here is that strong woman

@marcopolo-xj4yw 7 ай бұрын

She’s incredibly smart and bright. Love her style. Wasn’t intimidated for a minute with all those ‘dream team’ men.

@marcopolo-xj4yw 7 ай бұрын

Marcia Clark and Leslie Abramson are my fav criminal lawyers. Both tough women who can stand up to anyone in court. Different styles however. Abramson more theatrical.

@TrojanGoddess56 5 ай бұрын

Fascinating talk by Marcia Clark. She is a great speaker and has such a good voice. She addressed the issues of why the criminal trial was not held at the Santa Monica/West LA courthouse, the selection of jurors (you don't 'shop around' for a jury that will be favorable to your case), that the police were never against OJ Simpson, that he received favorable treatment from the detectives - the evidence was not planted. Regarding jury duty and prospective jury pool sizes, she pointed out people's financial hardships, that many employers only pay for 3 days of jury service, that juror pay should be subsidized nationally, which could allow for a greater pool size of prospective jurors to be selected for cases.

@GenXer333 4 жыл бұрын

I was extremely impressed by her on the first day of the trial. Still am.

@12rwoody 3 жыл бұрын

Being impressed for one day of 6 month trial isn't a ringing endorsement. Lol

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJibpKhvnKiqetk Here is marcia being impressive

@ryancalhoun2910 7 ай бұрын

@@12rwoodyNor is judging an entire career on one case

@1981lashlarue 3 жыл бұрын

30:00 Great argument you could have made to the jury Marcia, except you purposely withheld that very incriminating interview that Simpson gave to detectives.

@007nadineL Жыл бұрын

Wow she knocked that speech out of the ballpark !!! ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔

@ivandesantis858 5 жыл бұрын

I watched that entire trial. Our judicial system has never been perfect and many times people of color have had to swallow a verdict that they believed was unjust. I really just want to say how I feel about Marcia Clark. Marcia Clark was as fierce as any prosecutor I have ever seen. I know she stopped practicing soon after the case but if someone from my family was murdered and I had my choice of any prosecutor I would take Ms Clark any day of the week and twice on Sunday. She never flinched once in that trial vs the Dream team. She had no back down in her and I will always remember the earnest effort she put forth throughout that trial seeking justice for the Goldman's and the Brown's.

@daffyduckfan4478 5 жыл бұрын

Ivan Desantis Procecuting the wrong guy is not justice.

@ivandesantis858 5 жыл бұрын

@@daffyduckfan4478 They earnestly believed they were prosecuting the right guy and they believed in their evidence. They didn't charge him as some kind of stunt.

@carltonreese4854 5 жыл бұрын

Lt. Weinberg? Is that you?

@ivandesantis858 5 жыл бұрын

@@carltonreese4854 yeah I did borrow that from the Kevin Pollak character. Nice get

@jayceewriter7826 5 жыл бұрын

U didn’t watch the trial. She was a giggling, coughing bitchy lady who asked the same questions over and over, long pauses, no flow and constant insults to her colleagues not to mention her affair during work w Darden AND Darden later revealing they drank whiskey and tequila during prep

@csea4672 5 жыл бұрын

She's such a great lawyer and truth seeker. I love her rawness and transparency. I do remember how BIG OJ was at this time and everyone did love him... combining the racial tensions and police brutality, nobody was going to convict him no matter if he was caught on camera. They would've said it was a double lol it's crazy that in 97 she's talking about police inspiring trust to all communities and here we are near 2020 and still nothing lol

@YoungHaveNot Жыл бұрын

She let a murderer free in a slam dunk case. She sucks

@007nadineL Жыл бұрын

The elites stoke division on purpose. .

@kenginger8051 7 ай бұрын

I've been rewatching the trial. They were truly out-lawyered.

@rustymertz Ай бұрын

Definitely, but they proved their case easily. You could have shown that jury video proof of OJ doing it and they still would have acquitted him.

@davidlewis4162 5 жыл бұрын

Marcia Clark needs to understand this has been explained already, you can’t interrogate a sociopath of you will get nothing, the way they interviewed him was for a reason

@strnglhld 2 жыл бұрын

Well, sometimes they slip and inadvertently give incriminating statements.

@jameslong3663 2 жыл бұрын

@@strnglhld Like saying I bleed all over the place BEFORE I went to Chicago?

@richardpoplis6777 4 жыл бұрын

You are Marcia.. an awesome sense of humor.. god bless

@lynndragoman2454 2 жыл бұрын

kzbin.info/www/bejne/kJibpKhvnKiqetk Marcias nice side

@Jeromemayle Жыл бұрын

32:50 OJ wasn't the next of kin. And if that's the case why didn't they run and notify the Browns? Even years later she still tells lies and gives example that don't make sense. But lets play along why did Lange AND Vannatter BOTH have to go, and why did they bring 5 other cops...which were 2 uniformed officers, Fuhrman, Phillips and Roberts? And even IF OJ was the next of kin, you don't immediately stop doing your job to go do it. 33:17 Here's another lie, if they were going to notify him and immediately go back to the crime scene - why didn't they? They found out OJ wasn't home and stayed another half hour. 33:50 Why would they need to drive him to the station VS just taking his kids home to begin with? Right after the murders the kids talked to the cops and the cops knew they live close by, but they drove them a half hour away. 34:12 You can't just decide to go arrest someone they went to go snoop around. Vannatter was asked this and partially answered yes, Fuhrman actually admitted in the series OJ 25 that's exactly why they went. 35:05 PEOPLE LITERALLY LET HER JUST TELL LIES!!!! They DID search the place. 35:20 How would they know if the maid wasn't dead upstairs unless they looked? How would they know ANYONE wasn't dead upstairs? 37:00 They allegedly stayed out there ringing the bell for 15 minutes t a half hour. 37:40 ANOTHER lie, the kids could've easily given names and numbers to multiple people - even Judge Ito said that in court. 37:48 EVERY photo of the Bronco taken that day shows the Bronco was parked NORMALLY. BTW how does someone tell if a car is "Hastily" parked? Again Clark and the cops keep trying to use language to make visual images making OJ look guilty. According to their skills these people could look down any street and tell you what cars were parked in a hurry and what cars were parked leisurely. 37:53 She meant to say "Then the cop who plead the fifth to planting evidence......" 38:27 She's painting it as though these cops were OJ fans, Vannatter in a few hours after they go over the wall...calls Marcia to get a warrant, HE LIES REPEATEDLY on the warrant. 39:45 She always has to blame the mostly black jury....completely forgetting the prosecution repeatedly got caught in lies, put witnesses on the stand that they knew were going to lie, hid evidence that leans toward OJ's innocence, attacked ALL of Nicole's neighbors because their eye witness testimony didn't match their wacky ass theory...Painted most of Nicole's scared neighbors (that didn't want to be there in court) as fame-seeking-money-grubbing-OJ fanatics. THEY VICTIMIZED INNOCENT people in front of MILLIONS - because they were "Worried" about the victims Ron and Nicole. 39:59 Prosecution got caught lying, hiding and cherry picking evidence. The cops got caught lying and in some cases DESTROYING evidence. But yeah...OK, It was that black jury.

@pommiebears 8 ай бұрын

OJ wasn’t the next of kin to the children being held at the police station? Oh….ok.

@Jeromemayle 8 ай бұрын

@@pommiebears Great job showing that you didn't watch the trial. The cops said they were ordered by their boss Commander Buschey to go notify OJ. and commander Buschey even got on the stand to say that he did, He said that he was worried about the family learning about Nicole's death over the news instead of in person...and he was worried about the children being in custody. And that's why even though OJ wasn't the next of kin...he wanted them to notify OJ. When defense attorney Johnnie Cochran asked commander Buschey, "So you wanted them to notify the next of kin so they wouldn't hear it on the news?" And Commander Buschey said "yes". So then Johnnie asked him, "Did you tell them to notify Nicole's parents as well, the actual next of kin?" Buschey said "No". The trial was 90% full of the cops giving bizarre explanations for simple things then proving by their actions they're full of shit. Here's another example. 4 detectives went to OJ's which was unheard of just to give a death notification. 2 detectives were going to give the notification and the other 2 were supposed to help OJ getting his kids... That was their bizarre reason 4 DETECTIVES left the bloody crime scene to go some place else... OJ wasn't home so they had Arnell get the kids. Arnell, shaken by hearing the news her stepmother was killed, said she wouldn't be able to get the kids on her own she was to distraught to drive. NOT ONE FUCKING COP OFFERED TO HELP!!!!! She had to call AC Cowlings. Wait a minute.... I thought that's why the other two cops had come... By 6 am all the calls and notifications had been made, at 6:15 Mark Fuhrman claims he found the glove... The bloody crime scene needs their attention... but for 15 minutes the cops - who no longer have a reason to be there , just hang out at OJ's WHY????..... If you need help with me educating you on the trial any further just ask.

@cindynj 6 жыл бұрын

excellent presentation!!!

@FudgeYeahLinusLAN 4 жыл бұрын

What's up with her speech though? Is she coming off of novacaine or something? There is a slight slurring which I never heard during the actual trial.

@IMTooShort2C 7 ай бұрын

Noticed that too and wondered if she had braces or something like that

@richardpoplis6777 4 жыл бұрын

MARCIA YOU are truely a superstar.. you and Chris Darden were great .. god bless

@3ddiagnosis654 3 жыл бұрын

Free like OJ all day.

@GAURAV25855ify Жыл бұрын

Yeah so great that they messed up the case by the rubber gloves that did not fit which lead a bigger twist plot the Fur-man tapes about him lying about using the n word and planting evidence which was all revealed on the tapes which made the jurors believe that it was Mark Fur-man n the cops that planted those rubber gloves 🧤 at the Rockingham house during Nicole and Rons murder which was the smoking guns for the Dream team enough for him to get acquitted which it all adds up.

@lyndieskurry1969 6 ай бұрын

@@3ddiagnosis654he is dead now and a lot of people are glad about that… he still went to prison for years for another crime… his jail is in hell now!! lol 😅

@robgeorgia8801 5 жыл бұрын

I read Darden's book Years ago and he said that him and Clark both new that they were going to lose the case before the trial even started.

@3ddiagnosis654 3 жыл бұрын

Yeah right, what would they have said if they won? They expected to lose? Get outa here.

@strnglhld 2 жыл бұрын

I doubt that. I think they thought they had it in the bag considering all the evidence, he ran, previous DV calls, DNA!, etc. They just didn’t anticipate Fung’s evidence collection mishaps, Mark Fuhrman, how much black women love OJ, and the mess up with the glove!

@ninaj2171 6 жыл бұрын

I am fan this inspirational woman.

@anthonyd6370 6 ай бұрын

calling her a lawyer is an insult to vinny gambini

@lukamcghie6312 4 жыл бұрын

The guy speaking in the introduction... That little annoying mouth noise is PAINFUL

@Wesley-pb7qk 21 күн бұрын

Change the channel mo. Ro. N.

@frances4007 Жыл бұрын

This woman was given an impossible task ! I thought she was brilliant

@chrisb8655 6 ай бұрын

Then you are terribly misinformed.

@ZumaDogg 3 жыл бұрын

She's got the best vocabulary as anyone I have ever heard. Good talker.

@chriswilson8062 5 жыл бұрын

It's a human condition. If you feel like someone is on your side, if you feel like they represent you, that they're part of "your people" and you've believed in them for so long and admired them, you'll overlook and blind yourself to their flaws and wrong doing. It happens all the time in so many circumstances

@lindsaycarrick390 2 жыл бұрын

An illiterate football player, what did he ever do for society and the only people who should be upset are the Goldmans and the `Browns

@californiaslastgasp6847 Жыл бұрын

You mean “sub-human condition”?

@jumpropestairs6129 Жыл бұрын

@@lindsaycarrick390 u 7no yjh lyyy ultimate l6 yyhj

@crusader4273 8 ай бұрын

Despite all the detractors on this presentation by Marcia…I think she is magnificently brilliant. I do not believe what was not presented as to what was presented in this case, the high profile celebrity status of Simpson and the time line with the Rodney king case, was a losing battle from day 1. Marcia is an exceptional attorney and extremely articulate. Not to mention she is absolutely beautiful. Would love to me her one day.

@JCX-9 7 ай бұрын

Sadly they are giving undeserved credit to Cochran who in my opinion was a mediocre lawyer who used the race card with all black jury. Using a blood soaked shrunken glove as evidence of innocence. A trained monkey 🐵 lawyer could have done that.

@Michael-hv3ts 3 жыл бұрын

She is very sharp.

@javiermori1710 4 жыл бұрын

There is no question she made some mistakes in not presenting some key evidence.however i believe her staff and many others believed that the evidence was so overwelming that they did not weigh not presenting evidence vs presenting enough and didnt give it enough weight in key moments.obviously furman was huge problem and it killed the DAs case.there are a few but one of the most egregious errors was not admitting the next day "interview" simpson gave to Vanatter and Lange.

@lindsaycarrick390 2 жыл бұрын

All she had was DNA.and the the trial was a circus run by an inept judge

@ajdollarz1302 5 жыл бұрын

Why she didn't point all of this stuff out in her closing argument? She probably would have gotten a conviction..

@lindsaycarrick390 2 жыл бұрын

No way, this was a race trial not a domestic violence one, she is a brave courageous woman.You are lucky to have here in the USA.

@ef3602 5 ай бұрын

What she said about the detectives questioning OJ would have won her the trial if she presented that in her closing argument.

@Walter_E_Kurtz 4 жыл бұрын

I don't care for her too much, but she's a tough woman who was put in a rough spot for her job, she fought courageously and that's what I admire about her.

@evae.9424 3 жыл бұрын

You don’t care about her too much? Pfft she doesn’t even know who you are. MCP.

@Walter_E_Kurtz 3 жыл бұрын

@@evae.9424 I don't care much about you either, pfft and you don't know know each other either. So?

@glenn-goonermiller4267 4 жыл бұрын

So if OJ didn’t kill Ron and Nicole! Who did, why hasn’t anyone been arrested, so if OJ did do it why is he walking the streets; he needs to go to jail forever! As do the Rodney King LAPD bullies! I rest my case your honour

@mercedes5804 4 жыл бұрын

OJ did do it but he’s walking free because the jury found him not guilty not because they didn’t think he didn’t do but because blm was such a big factor. OJ walks free and can’t be retried because of double jeopardy

@ramslife7295 2 жыл бұрын

@@mercedes5804 not true

@DavidAdarmases12 2 ай бұрын

@@mercedes5804BLM didn't exist in 1995

@luisalonsomartinez8360 2 жыл бұрын

She deserved waaaay more credit than she got. It was imposible to have won to such a popular person in USA, specially with the context of race situations back in the 90s.

@jamiecann2485 2 жыл бұрын

She should’ve gotten credit for the loss along with cocounsel because they were having an inappropriate relationship/affair

@scottsears5545 8 ай бұрын

Wasn't there missing blood from tube vannatyer drew

@pommiebears 8 ай бұрын

No. The nurse who took it said he took a certain amount, but didn’t actually measure it to the drop. The defense knew this, and blew it up like there was blood missing, and it had been scientifically measured before the cap went on. It was estimated how much the nurse took.

@brianforke9976 8 ай бұрын

Better yet what are the chances that the killer was bleeding from his left hand and O.J. at 7:00 the night before had no cuts or anything. But wouldn’t you know it the next day has cuts on his left hand from breaking a glass hahaha. You can’t make that up, but people still think he’s innocent to this day. Man that guy has some bad luck, cut yourself on the exact hand the Killer was bleeding from. Oh with his blood all over the crime scene weird

@ezekielmajor5511 Жыл бұрын

Also take into the account that Darden and Clark, both have the personality of a fish. Johnny was charasmatic, clever, clunning, and held everyone's attention every second he spoke. I'm sure Ito dozed off at least once or twice during Clark's and Darden's arguments at some point. They were boring as a baseball game.

@johnwest194 Жыл бұрын

exactly well said

@annechris2677 Жыл бұрын

Johnny in hell

@TDKiller415 2 жыл бұрын

Alan Dershowitz couldn't have said it any clearer: "We didn't win the trial. They lost." Effectively he admitted that he knew OJ was guilty and that they didn't prove otherwise, they just distracted and confused the jurors all too well.

@lindsaycarrick390 2 жыл бұрын

"Dershowitz has made some of the most ill-considered remarks on television ie Rivera Live" Marcia Clark

@Tom-lv2mv 7 ай бұрын

LOL,how naive are you.Alan is a sell out

@TDKiller415 7 ай бұрын

@@Tom-lv2mv Yeah yeah, and Amber is innocent and there are 100 genders. We've all heard the pattern before lol

@Tom-lv2mv 7 ай бұрын

@@TDKiller415 his blood, hair and fibers at the murder scene.it was a sloppy murder.cas closed

@Tom-lv2mv 7 ай бұрын

@@TDKiller415 add his footsize, gloves.no alibi…etc etc should I go on

@Thomasdada 7 жыл бұрын

That look from 6:02 to 6:15 ...

@ingurlund9657 5 жыл бұрын

And you can't blame her. What a jerkoff the guy is.

@leonita.berisha7743 5 жыл бұрын

Thomasdada true 😂😂

@jimquantic 5 жыл бұрын

Ever think about the trial in this way? that it was the private sector vs the public sector. The champions from the private sector stomped the amateurish efforts of Clark and Dardon.

@ingurlund9657 5 жыл бұрын

It also helps if the jury wouldn't convict even if the defendant admitted the crime.

@Wesley-pb7qk 21 күн бұрын

Naaaaaa it was completely racist jury .. period..except the facts stop cowering from truth

@kensmith2796 8 ай бұрын

Clark's answer to not seeking the death penalty didn't make sense to me. She said they chose not to pursue it because they take factors into consideration such as prior crimes, nature of the accused crime and strength of the evidence. OJ had prior domestic violence crimes and the nature of the accused crime was horrendous and, according to her office, the strength of the case was 20 times enough to convict. So according to criteria she gave, they should have sought the death penalty.

@JCX-9 7 ай бұрын

This case was lost even before it started. The hateful black jury was a losing case right there. Such a waste of time. But the biggest loss here is the racial divide this case has caused, it set us decades back. Sadly the blacks don’t see it that way. Their victory was short lived.

@johnnyjack1552 8 жыл бұрын

Philip Vannatter never read Fuhrman notes About the fingerprint on the gate (Marcia Clark)

@philipwilliams2528 8 жыл бұрын

Johnny Jack-Whose prints were on the backgate.?

@rajkoelguapo12 7 жыл бұрын

"She is back and better then ever." Lol She and Chris did a terrible job on that case.....unbelievably bad.

@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb 4 жыл бұрын

Man, she talks like she and the rest of the prosecution had nothing to do with their losing the case

@interstategar 2 жыл бұрын

The prosecution did a great job. Johnny Cochran played the race card, and created a doubt. OJ put on the glove using his thumb to not make it fit. The prosecution should have pointed that out, but as Marcia said, the jury pool sympathized with OJ from the get go.

@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb 2 жыл бұрын

@@interstategar hence bad job by the prosecution,, they should of screened their witnesses throughly before putting them on the stand, just about every witness for the prosecution had a flaw that just ruined everything.. putting Darden on the case was also a mistake, very incompetent, disrespectful, and the jury surely did not like him… talk about a race card , they played the race card by putting Darden on the case,,, putting him only because he’s African American.. everyone knows this

@interstategar 2 жыл бұрын

@@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb I guess you didn't hear her talking about the jury questionnaires. I watched most of the trial on TV. I would have voted guilty, based on the evidence, and OJ's reaction to the wounds described in court. He was sobbing. Why would cry over Goldman's wounds?

@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb 2 жыл бұрын

@@interstategar don’t need to hear her talk about anything… the entire time since the trial… not one person in the prosecution has admitted to doing anything wrong… people can say guilty all day long, I don’t feel either way about it… at the end the jury found him not guilty… all the what ifs in the world , all the he play the race cards, or whatever else the reasons… nothing is gonna change.. the prosecution lost

@interstategar 2 жыл бұрын

@@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb If you don't have any opinion about the case, why blame the prosecution for the loss? You didn't follow the trial, so you have no credibility. Your opinion is based on nothing.

@peterdurkin1499 2 жыл бұрын

An honorable jury!!! Is what was needed

@Keepdapocket 2 жыл бұрын

An honorable police department who followed proper protocol is what they needed. I don’t care how good Marcia was (and she is good), she was going to lose. The jury did the right thing. It’s not about innocence. It’s about not guilty of the evidence brought before you. Every single piece of evidence had holes, questions, and doubt. That’s not Marcia’s fault. That’s the police and criminologist fault. Ask yourself. How many times did Detective Lang stayed he made a mistake? How many times did Detective Vannatter admitted to mistakes? Fuhrman, we already know. How many times did both criminologists admit to mistakes? How many times did All of those people admit that others made mistakes? How about the incompetent Chris Darden? The prosecution can blame the jurors all they want to. The case was in jeopardy the moment the police step on the scene to cell exit evidence. They followed no protocols!!!!!

@johnp82 6 ай бұрын

@@Keepdapocket the jury did NOT do the right thing. Minor mistakes are always made. All the circumstantial evidence still pointed to one person: OJ. This dumb jury didn't even understand the connection of domestic violence to the murders. One of them even said something to the effect of "it's not illegal to bleed at your own house". That's a dumb jury.

@Felaprudence 7 ай бұрын

What an intelligent woman. She is so strong because she is just smarter than most…

@lega6028 6 ай бұрын

Marsha Clark, you did a great Job of prosecuting theOJ, the evidence convinced me beyond a shadow of a doubt

@tonyb2481 3 жыл бұрын

Maybe Marcia farted in the courtroom, Judge Ito got pissed off and then it went downhill from there ?!?

@crewd00d Жыл бұрын

Did anyone else get incredibly irritated by the CONSTANT lip smacking of the person talking at the podium for the first few minutes? Like, it's every other word!

@vinylviper1971 2 жыл бұрын

I salute you Marcia Clark

@patricemonchais2892 4 ай бұрын

Take responsibility for putting Furhman on the stand when they knew he was a racist. Makes no sense to say you had a Mount Everest of evidence and to lose the case. This case was so frustrating .

@renaldcosma7192 6 жыл бұрын

I love Marcia Clark, she's beautiful, smart, lovely and a real charming lady . God bless her .

@Jim.Jim.32 6 жыл бұрын

No she was not. She was a bully who turned every witness into a hostile witness. Her harrassment of witnesses got so bad...Judge Ito told her to stop.

@edgarestradajr8192 5 жыл бұрын

She's overbearring and she'd always liked to talk out of turn, she's rude and annoying..

@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын

@@Jim.Jim.32 Ito was a misogynistic pig and if you actually watched the trial its plainly evident for all to see and hear. Marcia was a civil servant up against the million dollar dream team and although she made mistakes she was clearly outmatched. Darden hurt her and the prosecution a hell of a lot more than he helped.

@dixiedeed4918 5 жыл бұрын

Witch

@butchp51 4 жыл бұрын

She sounded bitter and awkward...the Roberts answer was a non-answer. Why wouldn't you have as many pro-witnesses who could have helped. She said he wouldn't have, and then calls Furhman? She was covering for Vanatter who did a sloppy job.

@lindsaycarrick390 2 жыл бұрын

She had to call Fuhrman, he found the glove if she had not called the defence would have called him. Read her book for `God,s sake

@pommiebears 8 ай бұрын

@@lindsaycarrick390 Furhman wasn’t called in the civil case. They won.

@mkt1847 7 ай бұрын

Pretty appalling to the families victims that the prosecution admits they thought it was likely they had a jury that they had lost, was biased, and favorable to the defendants based on a jurors comments and the overall jury's actions in court, yet they wanted to push ahead with getting a likely acquittal verdict so they did not have to retry. When you have that much evidence against someone, you owe it to the families and for justice to push for a mistrial or hung jury and take your chances in another trial despite the time and cost. Even if future jurors might be biased from seeing this trial, you try to do a better job to find a jury that is more impartial and you retry the case learning from the mistakes you made in the first trial. That is shocking that she basically admits they threw in the towel and just wanted to get the acquittal verdict over with. Sounds like they gave up on seeking justice to save money, public perception and time on a retrial despite having as she says a Mount Everest worth of evidence.

@John-kv7jo 2 ай бұрын

Even if OJ had confessed to the jury they would have acquitted him. They wanted payback for what was done to Rodney King. Rodney King was a criminal but they made him look like a saint.

@wheel631 7 ай бұрын

She was a great prosecutor ... unfortunately with that type of jury even Jesus couldn't have convinced them of OJ's guilt. Pretty telling that she said she never had more evidence against anyone in any case .. and she said race and celebrity was an impossible hurdle.

@JCX-9 7 ай бұрын

So true. And ojs lawyers were just inept. Calling them the dream team? Seriously, convincing an all black jury of this murderers innocence was a job for a fifth grader.

@Steevee14 7 ай бұрын

Why wasn't Jill Shively called as a prosecution witness? Didn’t she have incredibly crucial testimony incriminating Simpson? I understand that she sold her story, but that was AFTER she had already reported her road encounter, identifying Simpson - and his license plate number - to the police.

@irishuntley9225 2 жыл бұрын

Why is the VOLUME so low.

@helenal.7881 7 ай бұрын

The prosecution sucked. I wouldn’t want Marcia Clark as my lawyer.

@JCX-9 7 ай бұрын

You wouldn’t want all black jurors if you were white either.

@rustymertz Ай бұрын

She’s a competent attorney, but she looked amateur compared to the defense, and in a way, she was. The best lawyers start their own practices or are recruited by great firms. Attorneys that work for the city aren’t the best. That being said, she still presented a case that should have won the case if the jury wasn’t so biased.

@joemacdonald7879 Жыл бұрын

Curious, why take case if you know you will lose?

@pommiebears 8 ай бұрын

She didn’t “take the case”! She was assigned the case, had no choice but to try the case. Only private lawyers get to choose.

@lucylcaruso4207 3 ай бұрын

JUNETEEN puts different perspective on ON Simpson case on "timeline"

@brycewilson1909 2 жыл бұрын

this is truly incredible from Marcia. the prosecution, which was led by Ms Clark herself, bungled in spectacular fashion time and time again. even blind supporters of Marcia can see that she and Bill made some serious errors in this case. like having Chris Darden join the case. if you follow(ed) the entire trial gavel to gavel you'll see that Marcia did not truly prove the burden of proof beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt, she didn't. she proved the "yeah he probably did that shit" burden, but Dennis Fung messed up so much evidence, Chris Darden and the gloves, Furhman was racist and discovered the Rockingham glove all alone, Ito was weak and let too much stuff in, the Dream Team was excellent, etc etc. there *was* reasonable doubt. did it help that OJ was a celebrity? yeah probably. did it help that OJ was black? yeah probably. did the Rodney King beating and cops trial verdict potentially influence the outcome? yeah probably. Did Marcia Clark prove without any doubt that OJ did it? no, i dont think so. do i think he did it? yes. but for Marcia to sit up here and say she was fighting an uphill battle for justice is outrageous lmao you lost the case. the most slam-dunk case.

@tew-dawg9671 Жыл бұрын

Saying probably to all those things especially racism. Does that not constitute an uphill battle? We see it today more than ever. Racism trumps common sense time and time again.

@brycewilson1909 Жыл бұрын

@@tew-dawg9671 the prosecution in the OJ Simpson murder trial did not prove the defendant was guilty without a reasonable doubt, that is the prosecutions fault. it's actually the people who boil the "not guilty" verdict down to solely the makeup of the jury panel that are the racists lol. watch the trial, look at the evidence, listen to the witnesses. listen to marica and darden. they didn't prove their case. they just didn't. i am a white male in my mid 20's lol. i think the jury got it correct while also thinking OJ was guilty, some of the jurors on the case felt the same exact way. the Juice did it, but they didn't prove it. black people do jury duty all over the country and convict other black people alllll the time, if the prosecution did an A+ job? OJ would be in jail.

@jerryyang3516 Жыл бұрын

Slam dump how? 2 detectives tampering with evidence? The head csi fumbling crime scene evidence? Bringing Darden in to play the race card that hey we got one of yours. What else was spam dump?

@tonyd360 5 жыл бұрын

In her long winded criticism of Simpson's police interview she neglects to mention he voluntarily did so WITHOUT an attorney present. When they informed him they impounded the Bronco he said "that's fine." He told them he had guns "all over the place" and they were welcome to examine them not knowing the victims had been stabbed. Does that sound like a guilty man Ms. Clark? The district attorney's office never explored the possibility of another suspect. Simpson was handcuffed immediately upon returning to L.A. only hours after the murders. The police were locked in on OJ from the start. Then she misrepresents the evidence saying Simpson's hair was on Goldman's shirt and in the cap. The truth is the hair in the cap was African American hair "consistent" with Simpson's. It wasn't Simpson's hair. Just shameful lying.

@crimony3054 5 жыл бұрын

Listening through the interview, you'll hear that Simpson wasn't evasive about his cut hand, he was unconcerned about how he cut it -- because a small cut on him was unimportant compared to the murder of his wife. Of course, it was of great importance to the police, but Simpson didn't know that. It's almost as if he was ignorant of how his wife died at that point.

@tonyd360 5 жыл бұрын

crimony He had no idea as to how she was killed. He thought she had been shot. That's why he offered his guns to them. In the often misrepresented conversation with LAPD when he was in Chicago the LAPD told him his ex-wife had been killed. OJ responded "what do you mean killed?" They never told him how she had been killed. People have misrepresented that conversation for years saying OJ said "who killed her?" in response to the police saying "your ex-wife is dead." He never said that and the LAPD never said "your ex-wife is dead."

@elziewilson9279 7 ай бұрын

You lost and still making money off of OJ and the murders

@youtubeuser5683 8 ай бұрын

Q: Detective Fuhrman, have you manufactured or planted any evidence in this case? A: I (Fuhrman) wish to assert my 5th amendment right.

@truenorth7949 6 жыл бұрын

she looks so much better with her hair this way, but in the recent years she has put so many fillers in her face she's almost unrecognizable now

@csea4672 5 жыл бұрын

She just got a lil chubby... makes her face bloat and she's way older now lol she's in her 40s here

@TheGemini5 4 жыл бұрын

I actually think she looks better with age!

@TheGBPM 9 жыл бұрын

@ 47:26 Simpson's hair on Ron Goldman's shirt. The hair was NEVER identified as OJ's hair! Simpson's hairs inside the knit cap. The hairs were NEVER identified as being OJ's hairs! The blood at the Bundy walk had EDTA in it! Ron Goldman's and Nicole's blood in the bronco, this blood was identified months after June 13th. Nicole's blood on OJ's socks, were found 3 weeks after June 13th. All this after Vannatter had in his possession the blood vials of all 3. Sorry Marcia, your argument failed then and it fails now.

@andrab8472 8 жыл бұрын

she never convinced me,either

@csdr0 8 жыл бұрын

The GBPM, Let's set the record straight. OK? EDTA test was not done on the 4 blood stains collected at the bundy walkway so you cannot say whether it has EDTA or not. The Defense never asked for EDTA test since it's not an issue in this particular evidence. Obviously these 4 blood drops did not come from OJ's reference blood sample which was taken in the afternoon of the next day June 13. They are not planted evidence. The issue about the 4 blood stains is that the DNA materials were completely consumed by the microorganism which grew rapidly and feed on the blood. This was caused by wet swatches being stored inside a truck without aircon unit and exposed to the heat of the sun. The combination of water and heat allows growth of microorganisms harmful to the DNA genetic materials. If the DNA genetic materials were completely lost the 4 blood stains cease to be "incriminating evidence" and in fact they are no longer evidence at all since the owner of the blood becomes completely unknown negating the great value of DNA profiling which pinpoints the owner with incredible accuracy. Because the blood stain samples where contaminated with OJ' reference blood sample it is no wonder that the DNA profiling test showed the DNA marker of OJ. The one blood stain that is an issue at Bundy is the one found at the gate since it appeared only 3 weeks after the murder. It has EDTA, it contains more DNA materials than the one found at the walkway and most damaging of all, it was not there when pictures and video of the gate was taken. Barry asked Dennis Fung, "Where is it Mr, Fung?" Thus, the fact that can be deduced from these evidence is that this blood stain was PLANTED by the LAPD using OJ's reference blood sample which was taken the day after the murder. Nicole's blood on the sock was discovered one week after it was found lying on the floor and not after 3 months. It has EDTA also and the DNA content is so rich that it has more EDTA than the blood in Nicole's dead body. That's incredible. The blood also stained 3 surfaces of the sock as if no foot was in between. It means blood of Nicole from her reference sample was dropped onto the sock while it was lying horizontally. This is the fact inferred from these evidence.

@Gutulay 6 жыл бұрын

actually it is common knowledge that the hair on Ron Goldman's shirt was identified as OJ's pubic hair

@scottclark8856 5 жыл бұрын

@@csdr0 "the blood of Nicole was dropped on the sock was the inference" No! thats how you've interpreted it. The socks were wet with Nicoles, Ron's and OJs blood and when OJ took them off and left them on the floor of his bedroom the blood naturally seeped or absorbed through the material.

@dixiedeed4918 5 жыл бұрын

Marcia and state of California became famous OJ Simpson trail if century donate 💰 to Kim and Fred

@theroy7757 4 жыл бұрын

Alright, much of this is what i thought, but i gotta call BS on something here. At about 30:00 ..It was Lange and Vanatter doing that interview the 13th after being at Rockingham that morning, and the way she portrays this is so off that i felt like it was either her own subjectivity making her see it that way, or it's.. suspicious. In fact that interview was one of few things i've read (or seen) so far that i felt... that it seemed sincere. Anyway, just calling a spade a spade here...

@theroy7757 4 жыл бұрын

O.....-KAY... Richard Sammon's question starting at 51:50 is a definite "wtf" , and Marcia reacts that way at first, then she pushes past it without going "what the f*** is wrong with you?" , which is either very kind or... something else lol ... This guy being the president....... i won't speculate lol

@12rwoody 3 жыл бұрын

Awful interrogation by the Detectives. They didn't pin down answers and were far too accommodating,

@12rwoody 3 жыл бұрын

@@theroy7757 of course he was a suspect. They cuffed him in his backyard.

@theroy7757 3 жыл бұрын

@@12rwoody Yeah, even from the first moments in the case i believe it's normal to suspect ex / husband etc.. - let alone at THAT time.. And yes they did cuff him in the backyard... yeah that was before he was taken there wasn't it...

@robgeorgia8801 4 жыл бұрын

Where's OJ?

@marvellis6762 Жыл бұрын

It's was an interview not an interrogation. You don't want a possible prime suspect to clam up. From the law side all the blame is on you and Darden... complete and utter amateurs! Get a mirror Marcia

@annechris2677 Жыл бұрын

She's pretty and went thru a divorce at start of trial. I would have quit and stayed home crying

@patricemonchais2892 4 ай бұрын

Lang said the interviewed Simpson for one reason, to get his blood. It’s funny how Tom Lang is saying he was not a fan of Marcia smh.

@rustymertz Ай бұрын

She does seem like a cold fish. She doesn’t give me the warm and fuzzies. You hate judging someone who’s twice divorced, but she puts off the vibe that you’re gonna pay if you start arguing/bickering with her.

@carolcomins524 4 жыл бұрын

Fuhrman created reasonable doubt.

@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 4 жыл бұрын

Carol Comins How? Oj’s blood was everywhere

@ramslife7295 2 жыл бұрын

@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213 that racist 🐷 planted everything

@noproblem451 Жыл бұрын

@@jacksonk.fozzbodie213blood planted by fuhrman hence the glove diden’t fit.

@ccwnoob4393 4 жыл бұрын

Did she and that black dude ever thank OJ for giving them careers?

@sofialee49 4 жыл бұрын

Finally someone has said it. I was looking for such comment.

@mercedes5804 4 жыл бұрын

They HAD careers. Were thrown into a bombshell case based on Politics and Power. Were severely out weighed to a million dollar “dream team”. Marcia Clark constantly mocked in the media for 15 months straight. They both resigned from the DA after the case. So what career did OJ give and why would they thank him for the pain and trauma they’ve had to endure?

@jamiecann2485 2 жыл бұрын

She was having an inappropriate affair with cocounsel Christopher Darden…They should’ve both been disbarred and OJ should’ve been retried

@pommiebears Жыл бұрын

You don’t know that. You believe that, but you have absolutely no proof. I might believe you’re a bank robber, but no matter how much I believe it, without evidence of it, I can’t have you prosecuted.

@pommiebears Жыл бұрын

Oh…and double jeopardy means OJ can never be retried. He could outright admit that he is guilty, and he can’t be retried. He has metaphorically admitted it already, in his book, if I DID IT.

@paulajay473 10 ай бұрын

I'm sorry but Marcia admitted it

@ludovicatua6688 8 ай бұрын

@@paulajay473 past here the link of your source. If you have one. When she was hosted by Wendy she LITERALLY said the opposite. People should stop talking non sense on social media. Geez.

@FERNANDOAGUILAR-zy9sb 2 жыл бұрын

Of course blame it on the jury … typical incompetent lawyer

@nl887 Жыл бұрын

Even the jury admitted they were bias so it is the jurors fault

@pommiebears 8 ай бұрын

OJ: Made in America. A juror admits to voting not guilty as payback for Rodney king. So….its the jury’s fault.

@davemcinnes7886 2 ай бұрын

See, she is STILL wrong! She even talks to THIS audience as a hostile witness and comes across as unlikable! This woman is the embodiment of why this case was lost!

@brianforke9976 8 ай бұрын

Amazing how smart MF was, he knew the whole timeline when he planted that glove and knew O.J. left at a certain time and when they were killed with no investigation or before O.J. talked to the cops in LA hahaha. You know they went to Rockingham before a time of death was taken right????

@truesonic669 7 ай бұрын

Oj had the best attorneys money can buy. She understated johnny Cochran

@HwHw-s9e 5 ай бұрын

Who killed Nicole and Ron ?

@baalbezub6848 3 ай бұрын

Mafia hitmen hired by OJ, who turned around and double-crossed him. All of the real evidence points to this, even the FBI investigation which said most likely a ‘professional ‘hit’. You can say a lot of things about OJ, good and bad, but he was no cold blooded murderer(or a skilled killer), there was NEVER any evidence that pointed to THAT.

@DashDonivan 3 ай бұрын

It was OJ.. anyone saying otherwise is just making stuff up.