Mark Selby V Tom Ford - Ridiculous Snooker Commentary

Neil Foulds is flabbergasted with Phil Yates' absolutely ridiculous snooker commentary where he compares a match where a man with a four letter surname won the night before this match and the same may happen again.
Mark Selby v Tom Ford
Ronnie O'Sullivan v Michael Holt

[@Ironsvillage]

Yates with his top 50 useless facts noone wants to hear. Classic

[@KhunRoger]

Yates is the stupidest commentator on TV. He can't speak a normal sentence without adding something to make it odd or unusual by raising his voice at the end. He thinks he's clever. He's not. I wish he would retire. Mind you, Neil Foulds seems to think that commentating on what is actually happening on the table is less important than referring to his copy of "The Snooker Commentators' Almanac" and reading out statistics about how many times the players have met, who won the most, etc, etc.

[@Kayem967]

I agree. He's ruining my enjoyment of the matches. Stating the obvious in an annoying, self satisfied way.

[@tactical1981]

“We’ve been hearing in the news a lot recently that Black Lives Matter, but it would appear today that Black Balls Matter!” ~ Phil Yates regarding a respotted black

[@Kayem967]

I wish yates would go away. He's not funny, and his commentary is far less interesting than the professional or retired commentators. He's ruining the matches for me, because the more suspensful they are, the more inane and annoying his commentary is.

[@deanalexandrou3946]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂