TAKUMAR 135MM F/3.5 - Is It Good Enough?

[@MarkHoltze]

Just a heads up, the 135MM 3.5 version I have is actually a 5 element in 4 groups, not 4 element in 4 groups. The A and M vs (Auto and Manual) spelled out being the indicator. Always assumed it was the 4 element one so apologizes for the incorrect info. Shouldn’t impact the images all that much as seen comparing it to the 135mm f2.5 (5 element).

[@Zainphotography]

These can't be used on a Nikon's body and thats a shame :(

[@a4b5c612]

@@Zainphotography It works well. no focus to infinity with simple M42 to F-Mount adapter.

[@francescopaolodesiderio9784]

Sorry, news?

[@adam_mawz_maas]

@@Zainphotography That depends on the Nikon, they work fine on Nikon 1's or Z's

[@williambolton5679]

The first versions of this lens had 5 elements. Later versions have 4. There are 2 pages for information about this lens/these lenses on pentaxforums: www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/Takumar-Auto-Takumar-135mm-F3.5.html and www.pentaxforums.com/lensreviews/S-M-C-Super-Takumar-135mm-F3.5.html . I have three of these, the first silver and black version, perhaps the prettiest lens in my collection, the all black preset 5 element version, and an SMC version. The minimum focus distance on the silver and black lens is 200 cm, a little less than 7 feet, while my black preset and the SMC version focus down to 150cm, 5 feet. I don't shoot with 135mm focal length, so these lenses are just for my collection. The black preset I suspect has the best IQ of the three. Earlier versions of the lens have eight aperture blades, later versions have six.

[@71janas]

That's my first Tak❤. I use Takumar as tube lenses for extreme macro

[@Djonatable]

Premieres are cool, it's fun knowing in the morning that a nice vintage lens review is coming up ! Super interesting as always !

[@MarkHoltze]

Might not do them for all, or premiere it with like 2 hours notice so it’s a little less waiting around. Wish they kept the chat up longer after so you could discuss a bit more on the video.

[@DarkAriesKnight]

I love my 135/f3.5. You really can't go wrong with takumars it looks like. Plus if you have a pentax, just pop a ring adapter on it and now it's native k mount.

[@MarkHoltze]

I had no idea! That’s Awesome!

[@davidanstey1449]

I have a near perfect copy of the 135mm f/3.5 but I much prefer the Super-Takumar 105mm f/2.8 on a 1.5/1.6x crop sensor. On a 35mm Spotmatic however it is a very nice focal length. This finally being spring I've had a great deal of fun with the Tele-takumar 200mm f/5.6 preset lens both on its own and with extension tubes. With 10 blades it provides nice round bokeh and that buttery smooth background blur when taking shots of flower blooms.

[@scarpography]

Been doing astrophotoraphy with it and I gotta say, at F4 it is amazing, best 60€ I've spent on a telephoto lens.

[@MarkHoltze]

That’s awesome! I use it to try to snipe the space station when it passes. It wasn’t long enough to get any details, but it was fun. Got me thinking of using it for possible Astro.

[@scarpography]

@@MarkHoltze 600mm on FF at least for the ISS man 😂

[@joeysnburg4254]

I found a 135 f3.5 at an estate sale last year and it's really a great little lens! I use it on my canon 5dm4. Also the smc Pentax-a 50mm f2 is a fantastic little lens!!! (You have to modify it to work mirror cameras)

[@AlbertoSeconding]

Love your video format. Informative and entertaining. Since I got into vintage lenses, every time I acquire a new one, I like to spend quality time cleaning them with care on the outside to make them look (almost) new. It feels good to reuse something that has been around for decades and can still give. I'd love to clean and put this on my EF mount so don't clean it too much! Thanks!

[@MarkHoltze]

It's funny you mention cleaning it, it really is a fantastic process. I should really spend more time doing that with mine. Thanks for the idea mate, it's a nice way to relax!

[@robertbreish8182]

Dude new comer to your channel and I have to say the quality of your content is off the charts good! I recently just got into vintage lenses with my first arriving tomorrow actually (Pentacon 50mm 1.8). I’ve been a long time Sony user for the longest time but I actually just added a 2nd body Fuji XT4 to my lineup that I’m using for all my vintage glass. Looking forward to watching more of your content. Also Canadians are amazing. I know because I married one.

[@MarkHoltze]

Wow!! Welcome my friend! Please tell me how you like the XT4, I’m a little obsessed with it now lol. That Pentacon is loads of fun mate! Min focusing distance! Enjoy that!

[@robertbreish8182]

Mark Holtze Compared to my Sony A7RIV it’s a lot more fun to use and holy smokes is that shutter on the XT4 pleasing to my ears! Sooo quiet! And with built in IBIS now being able to get tack sharp shots at 1/4 second? Get outa here XT3 😆 I’ve got a steady hand and I was still getting blurry shots at 1/20 sec with the XT3. So question Mark...I’m a huge fan of soap bubble bokeh and the dreamy bokeh the vintage lenses have to offer. If price isn’t an issue (not spoiled I just work really hard) what lens would you recommend to me as a must have? Your review of the Takumar 135mm F2 is about to play next but I would love to hear what you think is the best or what your top recommendation would be for what I’m looking for. Thanks again for the reply!

[@HelpUsSaveLives]

The 135mm focal length is very underrated. Jack Nicholson has in his contracts that this is the only focal length he will allow to be used to film him in any movie! He loves that focal length. I have several different lenses in 120mm to 135 and these are amazing lenses.

[@MarkHoltze]

I agree, you need a bit more space when you shoot with it, but it resolves so nicely for portraits. I remember hearing all the focal drama from out cinematographer professor as to who wanted to be shot with what lenses. The key to being photogenic is a lens, camera angle and lighting lol.

[@BrennanMartin]

The dust on this lens gives me anxiety. Lol

[@MarkHoltze]

I call it Patina ;)

[@BrennanMartin]

@@MarkHoltze how are you liking the s1H? First time I've seen it on your channel. I'm thinking of holding out for the gh6 myself...

[@MarkHoltze]

Love it, been using it since Feb, but don’t usually make a lot of noise when I upgrade. It’s filling in as an A7siii alternative since that camera refuses to come out lol. Wanted full frame so I could keep the 1:1 photo ratio for these kens reviews. It’s also good enough for my commercial work to which I use all these vintage lenses anyway so only reason I’m sticking with FF

[@ISOrider72]

When it comes to 135mm I recommend the Schneider Kreuznach Retina Tele Xenar 135mm f4 I am using with the Viltrox Speedbooster on my X-T2. If you don't mind the 4 Meters minimal focussing distance and a price of around 30 € it is worth a try anyway. A very (!) compact,beautiful and very sharp lens with beeeaaauuutiful colours and a background separation that is nearly 3-d- ish. The buildquality I would describe as outstanding. As an amateur I can't say anything bad about that little beauty and after using it for about 9 months now,I mostly prefer it over the Pentacon 135mm f2.8 15 blades,that I only use for closer shots. I can't imagine any reason that this lens is more known, maybe I am the only one that is in love with it ,but that's what I am... The Takumars are on my list ,too and I will give them a try but by now I am trying to reduce my collection of vintage-lenses to these I really use.After my exessive GAS is flattening,I realised so many unused glass on my shelf,that is covered with dust. Anyway,very nice video again,thank you for doing what you do ,I enjoy it very much! Cheers from Germany,Alex

[@ryanbeer5262]

Wow, I need to quit reading the comments, that Schneider is a beautiful lens. I have a strong 135 addiction

[@lsdustyrhodes]

I have this lens. It's lovely. Agreed, very slightly soft wide open, and a little wispy, but to very nice effect. Sweet bokeh wide open. F16 also a bit soft from diffraction. The sweet spot is f8, but f5.6 & f11 are just about as sharp. Long minimum focus distance is a minor drawback. Overall, a fine lens and a great value.

[@MarkHoltze]

Yes, i rarely shoot anything above F/11, F/16 and F/22 also shows ALL the dirt on my sensor which is annoying AF because I clean it all the time! lol

[@AndrzejLibiszewski]

I often use the Sony A6300 with Carl Zeis Jena Sonnar 135/3.5 and I like it very much. It may be interesting to compare Sonnar with Super Takumar.

[@dtonicnet]

Top notch production ! Shipping to Belgium probably costs more than the lens ;) Keep up the good work! Your aspiration works inspiring ( and visa versa )

[@MarkHoltze]

Thanks mate lol. Belgium would be a nice backdrop for the lens, so happy to pay for that honour. Best of luck my friend!

[@dtonicnet]

Mark Holtze thank you for your positivity ! Kind regards Johan

[@dbkfrogkaty1]

How did I miss this video? I have several Takumars of various focal lengths. But for the subject matter here, yes I have two 135's. The Super-Takumar 135/2.5 and the SMC Takumar 135/3.5. Both is excellent condition. Especially the 3.5. You know I usually grab the 2.5 when I want that focal length but optically the 3.5 is probably better, with those excellent SMC coatings. Plus like you said it's much lighter. The 2.5 is a real chunk of metal and glass. 17.3 oz for the 2.5, 12.7 oz for the 3.5. Add that to my Pentax K-5II with loaded battery grip and I've got quite a load. But I like the mass of the camera and the grip as I ofter shoot in Portrait orientation. Ever try your Takumar's on one of their native Pentax SLR's or DSLR's?

[@neilyakuza6595]

Mark you have to try the Pentax 135 SMC f3.5 K mount. I also own the Takumar 135 f3.5, but I think the latter has sharper, and more contrasty. Give it a try.

[@MarkHoltze]

I’ve heard many great things about this lens! Thanks for the suggestion!

[@jmaza79]

I'm a fan of the super takumar and use the 50mm focal length the most but would not mind playing with this one on my Sony a7III and adding it to my collection.

[@Fotofan4life]

Thank you for making this video which i enjoyed watching. I recently bought the Pentax-M 135 f/3.5 (abt $50 w s/h on EBay.ca) to round out our little vintage prime kit (Tamron 24 f/2.5, Pentax-M 50 f/2, Soligor 105 f/f2.8 preset), using a K20D and ME Super Program. Both 135s share the same specs and garner very favourable reviews at Pentax Forums. I like your method of side-by-side 2.5 vs 3.5 image comparisons to highlight the 2.5s slightly better contrast and colour rendering. I look forward to viewing more of your reviews.

[@RandomLifeProductions]

It’s a lovely little lens... great for tripod city shots of crowds going by.... I’d say it’s a good little lens...

[@MarkHoltze]

Heck yes it is!

[@ErichNolanBertussi]

@@MarkHoltze that's what i'm seein' a urban b-roll master piece!

[@hernancastano9573]

I have the 150mm f.4 and I agree with everything you said. Great video!

[@MarkHoltze]

Thanks mate! I’ve got a 300 on loan now, it’s huge.

[@lucasmaiacarneiro]

you should start testing the Pentax K/M/A lenses. I started my vintage lens collection with a Pentax-A 50mm 1.4 that i love and it gave me confidence for trying the takumar lenses. but in most cases i end up coming back to the Pentax K/M/A, except when im looking for some excentric looks that only certain takumars can provide me (i love the flare on the 28 and 50, and the bokeh on the 85 its really amazing)

[@HYPERLENS]

Hello Mark, great video! I love your lens reviews and you also inspired me to start testing vintage lenses. Lovely greetings from Germany!

[@willmorrell488]

Love the shot at 3:32

[@MarkHoltze]

Ya, a happy accident for sure! ;) Thanks Joe!

[@catalin.tanase]

I have a Minolta 70-210 f4 "beercan" and a Helios 44-2 58 f2 for my Sony A7. It would be great to try the Takumar :)

[@MarkHoltze]

It would be, be warned, the addiction with these lenses is real ;)...good luck!

[@piezu.]

Great video as always Mark and greetings from Finland! I am using Nikon FE as my main camera body currently.

[@sperme2]

Love this lens!! Gonna use it on an X-T3 if i get it!

[@kazmeisterkometh122]

Great work Mark... Keep it going \m/

[@MarkHoltze]

Thanks!!

[@Phantommxr]

I would love it on my Fuji X-T1!! great review Mark!! .

[@MarkHoltze]

So good on Fuji mate! Best of luck Michael!

[@Narsuitus]

I use the following 135mm f/3.5 vintage lenses: Asahi 135mm f/3.5 Super Takumar (49mm filter) Fujinon 135mm f/3.5 EBC M42 (49mm filter) Nikkor 135mm f/3.5 AIS (52mm filter) All are inexpensive, well made, and produce very good images.

[@MarkHoltze]

✊

[@cuplesey]

Love the vids, very cinematic. Any chance of a vid on the adapters, thick/thin for which lens and why. Getting into the vintage lenses but which adapters isn't clear. Keep up the great content 👍

[@MarkHoltze]

I did one similar to that here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/jGTUl4OirqygmZo Adapter size varies depending on the lens type and camera mount. Most of these guys take that flange distance into account so sometimes they’re bigger than others.

[@EssexCountyPhoto]

Very nice video, thanks. I've just got a SMC Super Takumar 135mm f3.5 for £45.50 (UK, 02/2021), I'm slowly learning how to use it on a Canon 80D. Steep learning curve... 🤣 ...My next Tak will be... radioactive! 😱☢🥳

[@34Media]

Hey mate great job as always! Takumar Master ...

[@MarkHoltze]

lol, thanks mate. Only problem is, i'm OUT of Takumar's

[@34Media]

@@MarkHoltze flick me your address on insta mate ill send you my 300mm i was going to sell it as not 100 % and im using my canon 55-200mm more for my pano's the end of barrels a little loose when i got it but still take s a greta photo. something different for you

[@MarkHoltze]

Same name on insta?

[@34Media]

Mark Holtze @nightcliff_34

[@MarcoGomespessoal]

You told me in the last video that you prefer manual focus, and that you find it easier. Do you always use manual focus? Even when filming yourself? It's a matter of practice? Thanks! Another great video.

[@yevgeniymelnik7441]

Nice review! I have Sony A7R3 and never has a chance to use vintage lens with it. Would be interesting!

[@PhaseDriveVlogs]

I wonder how this stacks up against the Pentax 135mm f3.5! Takumar seems to have the edge based on this video...

[@MarkHoltze]

I always find lens to lens comparisons tough. 99% of our shooting is a dynamic subject, really challenging to pick them apart that way. I always find it quite surprising when I go out to do a dedicated test how I come back and really enjoy the images. I have the 6 element 135 F2.5 as well which is like “the one to own” but that didn’t stop me from going out and enjoying shooting with this one. But since you mention it, I’d be curious to see the diff as well lol.

[@PhaseDriveVlogs]

The biggest thing I noticed with this one was how usable it appears to be wide open I struggled to get a somewhat sharp image below f5 on my pentax 135 I definitely know what you mean about enjoying the images. I don't often pick up my 135, but when I do I find that I'm really pleased with the results (especially around f5.5 to f8 on my pentax)

[@jannevellamo]

I have the 2,5 in K-mount, excellent lens. Now, all I need is an XT-4...

[@MarkHoltze]

XT4 🤤

[@tonyzhu403]

For Me: Hexagon and Circles are fine. Not a big fan of other patterns.

[@AlexKeller1]

This lens would be an improvement in the sharpness department compared to mounting FD lenses on my Canon T2i. I think the hexagons look nice!

[@swesleyharris]

Great video 👍 I have wondered how this version would compare to the other 135’s by Takumar. I shoot on a Canon 6d.

[@MarkHoltze]

6D got it mate thanks! GOOD LUCK!

[@SunnySoCal]

this looks fantastic honestly i had an opportunity to get this lens but wasn’t sure about it now i am think i’ll pick one up for my a6500 😁📸

[@dansmit9692]

I really like vintage lenses and would love to own a takumar. I use a Canon t2i (or 550d). Anyway, love you videos. Cheers!

[@MarkHoltze]

Awesome Dan, good luck mate!

[@alchemist_x79]

Wouldn't mind playing with this lens. Using an a7RIII.

[@IsaacRC]

Wow, thanks for the giveaway Mark! By any chance are you planning to do a premiere on declicking aperture ring on a vintage lens ? You said in a video it was very easy ...😏😏

[@bobbygreen9106]

I already have an adapter. I just need the lens 😅

[@MarkHoltze]

Good to know Bobby! Best of luck mate!

[@eudf]

What Adapter!!?

[@jamallarose1452]

Great content. Thanks, Mark.

[@kaitodesu]

I'm using a Sony A7II and A6400 :)

[@jaylomat4996]

I'd love to have on my Fujifilm X-T3~

[@filter63]

this would be excellent on my x- pro1!

[@deroxdylan8077]

If I do win the lens it would go nicely with my 28mm pentax f3.5...I use a Sony E-Mount camera

[@killingspree5254]

I would really love this lens. Unfortunately olny lenses that go for cheaper prices in my country are zoom vintage lenses. Would love to have takumar for portraits. Btw I am using fujifilm xt100

[@killingspree5254]

@Revolting Peasant i have the minolta 58mm f1.4

[@dahdahditditditditditditda7536]

I'm always looking for sharp Takumars. I wonder, since you seem pretty knowledgeable about the brand - Is there a general quality difference between f/1.7 and f/1.8 Pentax/Takumar lenses? I realize that's OT for the 135.

[@JanneRanta]

Would love to try this out on my fuji x-t100. I already have an epic nikon e-series 50mm 1.8. Entering for sure :)

[@RATIBRAJAB]

Waiting you to start a series abot old fujinon lenses, they are great lenses

[@Pedro_Santo]

I absolutely love this lens!! I don't own too much glass but this is one of my favorite for sure. My copy is very sharp as well. On the S1H, how do you compare the color science over the a7III? Also when recording video, don't you miss punch in to nail focus? Cheers mate!

[@MarkHoltze]

Funny enough I don’t miss it. I thought I would be strongly I haven’t. I’m mostly using a recorder monitor with it so makes eyeballing it way easier. The EVF on the Sony is so bad (resolution) i find you need it for sure. Colour science is way easier on the S1H as well. I have the song A7sii, the A7iii made a lot of improvements to the image over the Sii...but still 8 Bit colour is painful when you’ve used 10bit.

[@turbochargedtransit7241]

I would love to shoot the 135 3.5 on my A7ii! Not to worry, I already have plenty of adapters.

[@tomsvintageoptix]

This video makes want this lens and makes me miss the Pentacon Auto MC 135mm F2.8 I had. It was a perfect little portrait prime. The aberrations seem to be minimal on the Tuakumar 145mm F3.5 which is great for a vintage. I didnt like 6 bladed bokeh at first but it works in certain environments. I liked the techniques you used at 1:04. I'm guessing a +4 close up filter on a wide angle lens?

[@zoculta3657]

I would love to get this lense, I started shooting film with an old f90x (nikon f mount) and I cant afford manny lenses so this would help me out a ton.

[@sammendolia5868]

Would love to use this with my Sony A7R2. Please.

[@DigitalNinja3]

Jupiter 11 vs This? Im conflicted... Do I need both? 😂 Which one would compliment my Helios 44-2 best?

[@MarkHoltze]

Stay Soviet! Just make sure you get a food copy. The Takumars are pretty much all good, but Soviet had a look, the consistency will be worth the effort finding a good one! Do it

[@john_murch]

This would work well on my Fuji X Pro-1...:)

[@QippysChannel]

Hey Mark, nice video as always, well I’ve entered and I’m using and EOS R , lets see if i get lucky 😄

[@MountainBoy99]

Entered, shoot on a Canon 80D. Curious how these 135s compare to the Nikkor AI and AI-S? Just what you need right, another vintage line to chase down the rabbit hole! Part of me hopes I don't win the giveaway because then I'll go kid in a candy store on Pentax M42 glass.

[@fabigafotos]

I would love to use this lens on my Sony a6300

[@mrwashur1991]

The weird thing is that I just purchased these two lenses as a package on eBay for like $80. 🤔

[@MarkHoltze]

Curious!!!

[@bombapiotr]

There is one thing I miss from the video. I'm super amateur at photography and video making, but when I use normal photo lenses to record video, they tend to change "zoom" slightly while I'm trying to focus. I experienced that with most lenses that I currently own. Does the Takumar also have that?

[@MarkHoltze]

Focus zoom is a feature most digital cameras have. I always use it when fine tuning my focus. It’s more of a camera function than a lens function. A newer lens might do that automatically if you manual focus it, but these old lenses don’t have any digital contact so there is no communication between the camera and the lens

[@kevrosas1]

If it happens on a manual lens, I think it’s called zoom creep and depends how loose the barrel is. I’ve had some which are really stiff or really loose. A good method is to use a rubber band over the barrel between the join to give it a better grip.

[@bombapiotr]

​@@MarkHoltze That's not what I meant, so let me explain in more detail. I have an old Pentax K3 DLSR with let's say Sigma 17-50 F2.8 lens. When I'm in manual focus mode, with focal length set to 50, I start to record and point at something. Then I move the focus ring and objects I see become bigger or smaller as if I was changing the focal length. The issue is very slight. Does it apply to constant focal length lenses? Specially, the vintage ones?

[@RickCrz]

Right now i Have an Sl2 Mark, and I was looking between the 100mm and this 135mm cuz its mostly avaliable at Brazil, I still have only the kit lens. But looking foward to make a kit of Takumars (Because of all yours reviews) mostly of my jobs are with Drinks / Food or Detailing, Bodies, like tatoos and stuff. What do you think should be my firsts primes? Thank you in foward.

[@illogicalcookie]

I'd love to shoot this on my C100! :)

[@mts-musictravelsportsvlog6112]

i tried my super takumar 135 mm to my sony A6400 using T2-NEX cause it will fit anyway. I wonder why it wont focus to the object that I want but the lens don't have any problem I guess.I want your piece of advice..Is it not compatible w/ the mount that I used? or there is really a problem of the lens? Thank you so much ,hope you'll help me..

[@tjwalkup7155]

I want, did you give it away? Sony nex here

[@AndyClement]

Sony A7II

[@dickenshrestha1016]

Sorry for being late but can you please suggest good tele photo vintage lens for lumix gx8 (super takumar)🙏🏻

[@MarkHoltze]

Any focal length 135-300mm would be good on that camera. It’s a micro 4/3 I think isn’t it? So the crop will give you extra range.

[@vladimirivanov6353]

Which 135mm old cheaper is the best,please?

[@youmetalcobra]

NIKE

[@infohere1000]

hi i use a canon t5i, i could use a lens like that

[@MarkHoltze]

You can, a little harder to use with optical viewfinders but still works.

[@invertthelab6532]

it's nice but you need to shoot it from next block

[@sergeylymarUA]

Oook , not smc pentax m :)

[@MarkHoltze]

Got it mate, thanks so much and good luck!

[@alfathsayyidina]

I hope i win this giveaway... It's equivalent of 270mil on my microfourthird camera...

[@MarkHoltze]

Sure is! Good luck!!!

[@alfathsayyidina]

@@MarkHoltze I did't have a Twitter, are it's okay just enter the giveaway from youtube?

[@jeghedderhenrik]

do you want a big challence, get your hands on the russian volna-3 lens for medium format, it demands some work to change it to an m42 mount, and i use a helicoid focusing adapter too, because the focus distance between lens and sensor er quite long,,, but i love it, it delivers some beautiful black and white photos and i call it my 50 shades of gray lens,,, the shadows in a photo are ,,open,, and every little gray variations are visible,,, with my helicoid adapter between the camera and the lens being slimmer than the lens, it looks like a mushroom allphotolenses.com/lenses/item/c_56.html

[@jeghedderhenrik]

did i mention that the bokeh ,,bubbles,, are wonderful, and sometimes its possible even to get som swirling with som luck and trying

[@MarkHoltze]

I haven't dabbled in medium format lenses at all, but I might put this one on a list Henrik! Thanks so much!!!! You're description of it isn't helping my wallet mate.

[@realamericannegro977]

Looks great to me

[@MarkHoltze]

✊

[@realamericannegro977]

@@MarkHoltze is this usable on the a6000 without an le a2 adapter? Just got the Minolta Af 35 to 105 mm af for it and im annoyed the manual focus or auto focus wont work

[@thedondeluxe6941]

Really great lens! I've used this for concert photography on both analogue and digital cameras. It's particularly good with micro four thirds sensors, as you basically get a tiny and light, but super sharp 270mm equivalent. This is one of the lenses that started my mild obsession with Takumar glass... ok, "mild" might be the wrong word :-)

[@somedutchguy7582]

My dad had one of these for his Pentax. He let me have his kit in the eighties, when he bought a new camera. I loved that 135!

[@tHaH4x0r]

Im just getting into vintage lenses, and got a helios 44-2 for my nikon. Seems like I might spend some money on a Takumar as well even if I don't win.

[@blasphemertheseventh]

I sincerely enjoy using this lens on the X-T4. Great combo.

[@MarkHoltze]

can i have your XT4??? asking for a friend (JKJKKJK) I would love that to be my shoot from the hip camera. What a great package.

[@imseeno]

I love this lens! It is the first vintage lens I bought. I got it for the equivalent of $15 USD. It started me down the path of getting vintage lenses (mainly cause they are much cheaper than modern equivalents). The only downside to getting these lenses are the fact that they're manual focus. I'm not too great and focusing very quickly, but at the same time, it gives me more practice of doing things manually. Just realized that this lens is currently attached to my X-T30 haha

[@FlashMediaStudiosTV]

Wow that’s a crazy deal $$$

[@KaloyanBanev]

Mate, I've been in situation, when I have to do a portrait photo session. The customer told me to lay off, my $2000 lens as soon as they saw, the shots on the camera screen and shoot the rest with TAKUMAR 135MM F/3.5. Extra speed, I don't care. The results are excellent! (Actually, I've used 25 year old strobes in the same session)

[@shzammpatapon9865]

please avoid using premiere bro. it sucks that we find out the video and not having been able to watch it

[@MarkHoltze]

But I like it lol. Means I get to hang out with you guys a bit. Try to give lots of warning, but maybe I’ll give less next time.

[@hexial]

I don't mind the premieres 👍The live chat is kinda cool

[@neilpiper9889]

Wider aperture more weight. I always go for less weight. I used this lens with extension tubes for watch and jewellery photography using a light tent back in the 1980s with Kodachrome 200. I used it on a Pentax Spotmatic. I used to print the slides on to Cibachrome paper in the darkroom. Those were the high point days of my photography life. Not all vintage lenses are soft wiide open. My Jupiter 8 50mm f2 is sharp as a pin

[@neilmceachren9485]

having over a dozen takumar lenses, i love my 135 3.5. yes a 2.5 would be great, but this one and the 105mm 3.5 are always in my bag as are my 35mm, 28mm, 55 1.8, 50 1.4 200mm and macro 50mm. I could go on and on. I love all my prime Takumar lenses and prefer to shoot with them versus the fancy zoom lenses. Boka and color and contrast are so dreamy. Old school makes my heart beat.

[@MarkHoltze]

Mine too Neil!!! Thanks for sharing! Happy I’m not the only crazy one out here loving these.

[@tomislavmiletic_]

I do have 135mm f3,5 in Olympus OM form and I love it. Thought about getting the Takumar variant, but prices are still a little bit too high in this part of the world...

[@MarkHoltze]

Maybe this one can fill your needs? ;) good luck mate!

[@raysrcsandtech]

Question, you seem to gravitate towards the Super Takumar, have you tried Pentax-M SMC glass (k-mount) what your view on it?, I have a few SMC ones now and as understand are newer generation over the Taks, should I try going back in time to the Taks or do you think the Pentax-M SMC are good enough? I have the 50mm 1.4, 135mm f3.5, 75-150mm f4 and the 200mm f4, I'm looking for a wider lens version but wondering if I should look at the Taks or just stick with SMC's

[@MarkHoltze]

Some of the ones I have are super multi coated, but they’re all M42 mounts. Not sure why but I’m partial to those ones probably as they’re the the “version 1”. I also don’t have a k mount adapter lol. Tough choice to make mate, it’s really up to you. Price and convenience.

[@optimumfilms]

I notice stop sign bokeh on TV and Movies a lot. I think it's pretty acceptable, personally.

[@MarkHoltze]

Yes it’s everywhere now. Loads in Better Call Saul...to name but one lol.

[@sergeylymarUA]

Oh ... And not only micro 3/4 ... :) We sorry .... Sorry

[@RockitDontstockit]

Great video mark! currently running the a7iii, grabbed myself a vintage Pnetax A 50mm 1.7 and a Praktica pentacon 28mm 2.8, which both surprised me! I think an 85+mm would be next up.

[@JonathanBradysouth-africa]

I'd be VERY interested in getting one of these. I've never owned a vintage lens before. I use the Fuji XT-3 (Hopefully the XH1 soon too). I'd love to see the colours/look this thing renders on my body.

[@kazmeisterkometh122]

Once you do get your first lens... Its just a downward spiral. Unless you have the self control of a Monk

[@TheRaxxo]

Looks like I’m still able to participate This past 2 weeks I been kinda binge watching most of your videos, hopefully I could try the famous takumar on my m50 😅

[@MarkHoltze]

Yes you are in mate! 13 days GO!

[@erwinsusara]

Favorite lens on GX85 is Super-Takumar 50mm f1.4 on dummy adapter. Focal reducer on its way!

[@MarkHoltze]

Let me know how you like it. Booster or no booster

[@colinlee8745]

Another great video, Mark. I keep watching this one .... lol. I must say I've become a fan of the 135mm focal length on my Fujifilm X-T2. I've been using an Olympus OM Zuiko 135mm f2.8 and the more I use it, the more I like it!

[@alexadrianov8357]

There are two versions of 135/3.5 SuperTaks - the earlier one with 5 elements in 4 groups and the later one with 4 elements in 4 groups. Sorry to disappoint you, but you happen to have the first one ;) Second version has AUTO/MANUAL markings for the switch rather than A/M, and there's never a "4" mark on the aperture ring - it's "3.5" and then immediately "5.6" (first version might or might not have this "4" mark).

[@MarkHoltze]

Yes, someone has mentioned that lol. Thanks mate. Was told it was the 4 so I was looking for the 4 assuming it was. Regardless the results between the two based on the 2.5 vs 3.5 shouldn’t impact the images enough to make a huge deal. Thanks Alex!

[@alexadrianov8357]

@@MarkHoltze I happened to have the second version for some time, sold it with no regrets - it is utterly boring. Earlier one seems to have a tad more character.

[@Customer_Support_]

3:20 Mark likes to get a good leg work out. Clue next scene What??? That’s cheating 😱. Love the out and about shots, another great video to make Aj buy another lense he now thinks he needs.

[@MarkHoltze]

Intentional line...;) glad you caught onto it lol.

[@JaumeMS]

I would use it in my XT-3. It would be nice to win it because i haven't any telephoto prime!

[@MarkHoltze]

It would pair nicely with your XT-3 for sure! Good luck mate.

[@lamarcy]

Nice!!! I own a 50mm f1.4 super takumar and I also have 35mm 2.8 minolta. I don’t have a 135 yet. I use a sony a6300. I hope I win this one. I could use it for portraits. Thanks for doing this giveaway even if I don’t win it. Good luck to all! ❤️