Markus Gabriel: What Kind of Idealist (if any) is Hegel?

[@vsavage9913]

Only one minor correction ‘Thoughts without content [not intuition] are empty’ the term is Inhalt. I guess the idea is that it not be intuition specific but may also be merely conceptual.

[@vsavage9913]

Pure brilliance

[@levinahmed]

Thanks

[@Jy3pr6]

Is the lecture on Absolute Idealism available?

[@StraightEdgeXVegan]

38:00

[@Thewonderingminds]

Man’s transcendent drive All men in darkness, are blind, soul senseless, act rotten kind, ego boosted, lost by pretense, chilled sleepy, or over intense. By day, even mere sparrows, joke at scary night shadows, religions, expounding belief, in contrast to truth, sell grief. All our tears, joy and sorrow, from one source, we borrow, whether it is delight, or pain, only real love, is man’s gain. Divine love, one’s heart dear, deeper than laughter, οr tear, one single true divine reality, of love happy, in immortality. Oh this love deep at heart, of soul grown, cosmic art, man’s self redefining light, the only real, divine Christ ! From the line, E. Ελλyμευ'

[@atnafuzewdie8714]

The Whole,Science of logic is the ; ontological Prof of God.That is to say ;The Absolute Idea-Mind-Spirit.The Intelligeneblelety of nature means to create it.

[@BenNCM]

What is the point of this talk? What advancements does it make?

[@LaureanoLuna]

Essentially, he boils down Hegel's idealism to a methodological principle of intelligibility of reality. A bit naive, I'd say, because the principle of intelligibility is unintelligible without the claim that the real depends ultimately on reason and is of rational (e.g. not physical) nature, which is indeed a strong idealist metaphysical claim.

[@Sphnxfr]

Couldn't you also say that the claim that the physical is not rational seems like a rather weak materialist claim?

[@galek75]

@@LaureanoLuna Your (implied) reading of Hegel is what is contested by Gabriel.

[@LaureanoLuna]

Read me better: I have expounded no reading of Hegel.

[@galek75]

@@LaureanoLuna But you're clearly juxtaposing Gabriel's interpretation of Hegel with some other interpretation.