not a bit bro she's going way too fast i keep zoning out every 5 seconds@@mugi3090
@Christina-yr1ru6 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 I said the exact same thing
@arashiii-21m3 жыл бұрын
Our caribbean exams are really similar to yours and honestly you are a godsend
@arinarahman37584 ай бұрын
what do u mean by Carribbean exams?
@shajalal15965 жыл бұрын
Love your explanation. Seriously no doubt now in this topic.
@bishrbourghli50814 жыл бұрын
you whizzed through how it works and then spent 5 minutes explaining relative abundance and that there is 25% and 75%, thats not the bit i was struggling with xD
@ramenyoun5014 жыл бұрын
Good luck for the Autumn session lads!
@baz99104 жыл бұрын
aight
@taffsworld55314 жыл бұрын
Todayyyyy!!!!!! Good luck
@ellieellieellie-25 жыл бұрын
So is deflection the same as ion drift for question 2? It seemed in your explanation that acceleration caused the ions to separate, is that incorrect?
@leahjames13574 жыл бұрын
yep deflection is the same as ion drift
@carldzidula86674 жыл бұрын
Se didn't say acceleration causes ions to separate She said it the electric plates causes the acceleration of the ions because it is positively charged and the plate is negatively charged causing attraction because opposite poles attract
@MissCristina3 жыл бұрын
From AQA Student guide : Time of flight mass spectrometry "the three isotopes of magnesium (24Mg+, 25Mg+, 26Mg+) will travel at different speeds through the flight tube and separate, with the lightest ion (24Mg+) reaching the detector first." so in ion drift phase they are separated.
@bentownsend40172 жыл бұрын
I think two types of mass spectrometry are confused there. One involves different angles of deflection and one involves different speeds of ion drift
@DAONEWITHDAFRESHCUT4 жыл бұрын
I really felt it when she went "hhhhaaaaaaannnnhaaaa"
@horlarlexy47114 жыл бұрын
Sorry Lads But it gets wayyy more difficult and confusing
@themilkemissary78984 жыл бұрын
Help meeeeeeeeeee! I cant find a good vid to help me with it
@horlarlexy47114 жыл бұрын
@@themilkemissary7898 kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKO6c42EpMt_nLc. Hope that helps, cuz it helped me (A-level chemistry tho)
@jessahayes22664 жыл бұрын
Prince Lalex I already regret taking a level chemistry. We’re 4 lessons in and already we’ve covered quantum numbers, loads of difficult graphs and sub shells. My brain feels like it’s about to explode it’s so complicated.
@horlarlexy47114 жыл бұрын
@@jessahayes2266 Well, if I'm being honest it's same for me. But I just go through it myself again & again. And I use online vids & textbook's. And I do this again, 80% of time I don't understand Biology in class, but once I get home it's a different story
@ramenyoun5014 жыл бұрын
You mean A2 right?
@MireraNYAMWEYA2 жыл бұрын
As an American the zed always gets me
@jetlinjacob61374 жыл бұрын
so so so helpful!
@subhanm13124 жыл бұрын
How do you calculate time of flight? When you are given kinetic energy and velocity????
@readabookdummy4 жыл бұрын
If you have velocity just do velocity=distance/time and rearrange for time. You will need distance tho
@eloisestratton-evans17363 жыл бұрын
They ask for this in the AQA chemistry Exam Board - you can find detailed up to date notes on the AQA website when searching 'time of flight mass spectrometry'.
@salmannadeem2827 Жыл бұрын
wht about edexcel? @@eloisestratton-evans1736
@sheasexton36364 жыл бұрын
it's leviosah, not leviosarr
@lookunderyourtable85034 жыл бұрын
Omds😂😂😂
@hikmatmakinde79344 жыл бұрын
This was very helpful thanks
@tomlefish78803 жыл бұрын
where do you mention deflection? did you mean detection coz I'm confused
@madlaz57954 жыл бұрын
Why is she going so fast? We come here because we don’t get it...yet she’s whizzing through it
@Wasteman3654 жыл бұрын
I have it on double speed.. slow it down if it’s too fast
@baz99104 жыл бұрын
@@Wasteman365 hahahh
@frankyao58544 жыл бұрын
I think it's purpose is more to serve as a quick recap, I'm using this for revision rn for instance. There are more detailed videos out there if you are trying to learn this fresh.
@SevenStepsAhead Жыл бұрын
she even gets most of the questions wrong
@izziecarter21534 жыл бұрын
On which video do we swap from AS to A level ?
@TaylorS04104 жыл бұрын
you mean year 1 and year 2?
@Charl_Ed3 жыл бұрын
@@TaylorS0410 In Wales it’s As and A-level (same thing tho) 😊
@TaylorS04103 жыл бұрын
@@Charl_Ed ah I didn’t know. In the UK, they used to do that but know it’s just year 1 and year 2 content as we have just one exam (A level) at the end of the 2 years
@winniethepooh87663 жыл бұрын
@@TaylorS0410 wales is in the UK. im assuming you mean England
@TaylorS04103 жыл бұрын
@@winniethepooh8766 sorry yeah 😅 I meant England
@libbyharris17495 жыл бұрын
In electrospray ionisation, are the particles ionised by gaining a proton from the solvent or by the large positive charge of the needle? I've read both and I'm not how to reconcile the two. I'm doing AQA A Level Chem btw :)
@lucasstokoe99195 жыл бұрын
Libby Harris it’s from the spray of electrons knocking electrons off the molecule
@libbyharris17495 жыл бұрын
@@lucasstokoe9919 isn't that the other method of ionisation? As far as I can tell, at this level of study you can do it with a beam of electrons from an electron gun (as you're describing) or with the hollow needle connected to a positive terminal and a volatile solvent. In the AQA student guide it says the particles gain a proton from the solvent, but in this video it says they lose electrons as they leave the needle due to the positive charge. I feel like it's not that simple and it's a combination of the two :)
@Lichalfred5 жыл бұрын
It gets a proton from a solution, when micro/nanodrops of solvent evaporate in flight, leaving an analyte molecule with a proton from solution. The high voltage of the tip assists this process by adding extra charge to droplets. One does not come without the other. The proton affinity of the molecule is therefore the critical factor here, as it determines whether the molecule will be ionized by protonation (positive charge), de-protonation (negative) or just preserve its charge that the molecule has in a solution, etc.
@milliehenshaw91135 жыл бұрын
They gain the proton from the polar solvent
@EsotericMedic5 жыл бұрын
It is really confusing! Initially I learnt Electron impact ionisation (where the electron gun knocks off an electron) and only now have I learnt this new stuff with the vacuum, needle etc....Not sure how to come to terms with both techniques.
@randomfactsGG4 ай бұрын
Very well explained
@CHANELLEPLAYS4 жыл бұрын
I seriously don't understand anything here
@godgod63354 жыл бұрын
Set 8
@ShaRad23144 жыл бұрын
@@godgod6335 really not. this is one of the most difficult topics. Why do you feel the need to downgrade people
@godgod63354 жыл бұрын
@@ShaRad2314 it really isn't one of the most difficult... IT'S ONE OF THE EASIEST
@ShaRad23144 жыл бұрын
@@godgod6335 it maybe so to you... please don't assume everyone finds it as easy as you. I find all the other topics easy but I really struggled on mass spectrometry. So not everybody thinks like you
@MM-zm3sq3 жыл бұрын
@@godgod6335 if it was easy why are you watching this video
@SevenStepsAhead Жыл бұрын
a walk in jurassic park
@aidaeshraghi97414 жыл бұрын
Hello I love these helpful videos but like the pace at which the explanations are being said are too fast for hearing and understanding at the same time. I would be grateful if you could lower the pace of speech in the future videos. Thank you
@shazgod60374 жыл бұрын
u can play the vid slower
@henstar3374 жыл бұрын
set the video speed using the slider in the video options
@dark_is_my_tea39464 жыл бұрын
I agree. She needs to slow down a bit
@kma22434 ай бұрын
To find the relative atomic mass, why do we need to divide it by 100??
@amanullah47187 ай бұрын
What software you used to make this slide presentation?
@peterdrake51564 жыл бұрын
Mass spectrometers produce a mass spectrum not a mass spectra. Spectra is plural.
@abbasrizvi24883 жыл бұрын
Spectrometers is also plural
@khalidomar4764 Жыл бұрын
lifesaving!!!!
@arifmammadov54212 жыл бұрын
Why are the relative atomic masses of many isotopes decimals and not whole numbers?
@hog70692 жыл бұрын
Relative atomic mass is actually the weighted average mass of all isotopes and their relative abundance in a specific sample of an element. For example, the relative atomic mass of Cl is 35.5 because its found using the formula, isotopic mass × relative abundance + isotopic mass + relative abundance ÷ 100 (100 because the total percentage of relative abundances of each isotope is added up to be 100) so basically 35 × 75 (cl 35 abundance is 75%) + 37 ×25 (cl 37 abundance is 25) ÷ 100 = 35.5 . Hope this helps
@mlyka174 жыл бұрын
The lip smacking noises are low-key annoying 😂😂😂
@maxharris52495 ай бұрын
Why did u point it out 😭 now I’m noticing it
@johnsisac19074 жыл бұрын
What am i doin here with cbse
@SevenStepsAhead Жыл бұрын
she speaks so fast lmao i keep zoning out every 5 seconds
@HannahAbraham284 жыл бұрын
LOL I HEAR HERMIONE OMG
@robbiemcdonald41443 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to download the notes you're teaching from if we pay for the course?
@launchpadlearn3 жыл бұрын
Yes! You can get a copy of cheatsheets, handbook, notes and access other resources like videos, quizzes and a lot more if you subscribe to our packages. Just head on to snaprevise.co.uk for more info! 😊
@priyankapanchal66654 жыл бұрын
Chloroquine na IR,Nmr Ane mass spectra kae rite sodhvana
@nastaranghahremani29004 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know the difference between mass spectrophotometry and mass spectrometry?
@thescavenger50034 жыл бұрын
it's the same :)
@nastaranghahremani29004 жыл бұрын
The Scavenger thank you💕
@tayyibah47654 жыл бұрын
I’m sorry but, if I wanted a bunch of notes recited to me I would’ve done it myself
@bentownsend40172 жыл бұрын
The idea is this video is where you learn the information to write down in notes, not the other way round
@Lopooop2164 жыл бұрын
she talks way to fast maybe talk a little bit slower 😁
@lucafaggiani44014 жыл бұрын
u are talking too fast mate
@fatimaismael14384 жыл бұрын
I love you
@EmptyCerealbox_ Жыл бұрын
bro is sonic 💀
@harry011984 Жыл бұрын
Good but you start going through the se things very quickly. Its a bit too fast!