Mastering PRINCE2 7th Edition Practitioner Exam: Comprehensive Guide with Dr. Franklin Folahan

[@pawewincenty4408]

Simply Great! Thank You, Dr. Folahan for Your efford.

[@evangallo5495]

This has better explanation than the ones provided by Peoplecert.

[@henryantony4615]

Excellent PRINCE2 practitioner revision class !. It helped me to get a good feel of the actual PeopleCert exam. The PRINCE2 training program which I paid for never came up to this level. There we received a lot of easy-peasy questions, which only instilled a fake confidence to those students without any real world PM experience.

[@surindersingh4468]

This is so good and really helped me to revise. However I think these companies need to be told a practitioner exam is 56 questions worth 70 marks and not 70 questions. Would be lovely if we could get more sample mock papers :)

[@ray__ade]

Question 39, the options on the screen are not correct (tallying with what you are saying). Can you share them please? 1:08:39

[@Therealog678]

The following entry has been recorded in the risk register: "Risk description: Due to the low level of recognition of the NowByou brand, increasing the brand recognition could help potential donors to recognize the work that NowByou does, increasing the number and amount of donations." "Response: Exploit the opportunity: Employ an external brand specialist to maximize brand recognition during the campaign." Is this an appropriate application of the 'risk' practice, and why? A. Yes, because this response should make the uncertain situation certain by removing the risk B. Yes, because the response should reduce the risk's remaining realistic likelihood and size of impact to zero C. No, because this response should be recorded as 'enhance', rather than 'exploit' D. No, because the increase in donations should happen after the project has closed

[@thecomedian8565]

This is brilliant, thank you so much

[@rachaelturner8296]

This is really good! Do you have any for Prince2 Agile Practitioner please

[@odufuwarashidat]

Very helpful. Thank you

[@one80sx]

For question 17, how are they meant to quantify know how much discrimination would have increased without the campaign? Shouldn't there be data of the current state in the business case under reasons which you would then compare realized benefits to? Answer D makes more sense to me.

[@Therealog678]

It’s a true answer however "Business justification is not only about costs but also about understanding the value of a project." Therefore, the approach chosen is a valid approach.

[@adnangill17]

i failed my practioner twice :( on both occasions got 39 marks but needed 42 . any tips? i have rebooked and will do again next week.

[@Anna-mo8ft]

Thank you

[@sheldongenis8512]

Question 33 Option C correctly identifies that improved brand recognition is an output. Option D highlights that increased donations and financial aid are benefits (outcomes). Improved brand recognition is an output of the campaign. It’s something the campaign delivers. Increased donations and financial aid are outcomes resulting from the campaign’s success. I still lean toward option C as the more accurate choice. However, the question’s wording does introduce some ambiguity, making it a challenging decision. It’s essential to consider both aspects: user expectations and campaign outcomes. Let me know your thoughts.

[@Therealog678]

According to this business practice projects deliver outputs in the form of products the use of which cause changes in an organization. Therefore c does not explain the project product but the result of its use and its benefits

[@BA-sf4uw]

Thank you, Dr. Folahan