Mastering the art of Cross-Examination: Practical tips with law - Justice Ved Parkash Sharma

[@ramajayamassociates]

Excellent sir and thanks for u r point, i am. From chennai high court lawyer

[@RuchiSharma-sq6oq]

Nice explanation 🎉

[@shekhartalashilkar7063]

Nicely explained insights of Cross Examination. Thank you🌹🙏

[@rambaharinadh2912]

Excellent sir

[@saviocharles6809]

Very good inputs

[@adityatripathy8868]

Very good discussion.

[@adityatripathy8868]

The simplicity and the pace of the explanations was just Super. Even as a doctor I understood everything. Gratitude.

[@satishsood3829]

Sir, Thanks a lot.

[@bjrao61]

Good subject

[@dharamdadhichi2926]

Future generations of lawyers will be indebted to your initiative to bring such lectures to them. Highly indebted to hon'ble Justice saahb and CLC team.

[@shivakumarjagirdar3543]

SIR vilkas charthdhi sir please when attachment Raising ;petition is maintanble which stage is applicable please take up class on subject of Excution proceedings order 21 of cpc

[@shivakumarjagirdar3543]

Sir please take up the class Expert judge use the all paractioners LAW,ADVocates,Sir in os,E.P. in Appeal stage ,ARBITRAtiom procedings a specialy in E.P. procedings RAising Attachement procedings

[@mohitsharma8890]

How to mark the passage from 161 CrPC statement for the purpose of contradiction, if during cross examination witness completely rejects his 161 CrPC statement saying "I don't know what police has written, this is not the statement I gave, police have completely changed my version"

[@user-cz1zm7mi8m]

Practical questions and answers is necessary to put only explantion is not important

[@rambaharinadh2912]

100% correct

[@nikhil_mahajan685]

Thank you Sir and the entrie CLC team for such great videos. 👍🙏

[@anujkkkkk]

Excellent lecture

[@chrisreay77]

Very helpful sir As my brother by name Mr Philip Reay msde his wife to give false fabricated evidence at 10 acmm court ms Marlyn Gomes teacher at presidency College of my advocate is mr PR Bhat Need all public advise support from legal Lumineers Thank you sir Very much

[@vijayakumarpoovar8890]

Good lecture. Yet some more clarity is required about cross examination of witnesses by prosecution in respect of S-154 Evidence Act. Normally after making the witnesses hostile the Public Prosecutor just reads the statements of hostile witnesses available in their 161 crpc before them and get admitting the occurrence from their mouth. Now the court says that witnesses admitted the occurrence and court can give conviction. Is it allowed as per S -154 of Evidence Act?

[@dharamdadhichi2926]

Read 154 (2)

[@dharamdadhichi2926]

However relying on 161 statements for conviction is wrong and illegal. It must be immediately protested by the defense counsel

[@RuchiSharma-sq6oq]

🎉😊😊

[@prasantb1238]

This Christian doesnot know who is the father of his Jesus Christ and pointing fingers at age old religion/ way of life. :P