i actually really liked a lot of these memes, except for the set theory one
@user-th5ej9rx9i6 ай бұрын
New year, new me The new year: dy/dx Me: e^x
@roisaliva27236 ай бұрын
I love math, this made my night a bit better
@prakhartripathiviii-a42356 ай бұрын
Before 8th grade seeing x-ah shit! After 8th grade seeing calculation with numbers higher than 20- ah shit!
@H3XED_OwO6 ай бұрын
listening to math memes after doing a whole buncha math is such a mood
@microwave8566 ай бұрын
3:48 the i disrespect is crazy
@axelinedgelord44596 ай бұрын
1:28 wait wait wait, you can’t even visualize that with extra dimensions! -perfect-
@newwaveinfantry83625 ай бұрын
You can. This is actually a really interesting idea. Let C be the complex plane and R the real line. Then adjoining A to C gives us C[A] which is simultaneously a 4D vector space and a ring. R[A] is similarly a well-defined 2D vector space under addition and a ring under addition+multiplication. It's just that the absolute value function is no longer visualizable as a distance function. It is also no longer a norm, as C[A] is not a Euclidean Domain, or even a domain of any kind as A and 1+A are zero divisors as A^2=-A, so (1+A)*A = 0 without either therm being zero. This means you can't always cancel out like terms, making the algebra annoying. Basically, imagine R[A] the same way you imagine C = R[i] but with A instead of i. The imagine that the abs function works normally for the real line but it sends the positive half of the y axis to the negative half of the real line and the negative half of the y-axis to the positive half of the real line by sending A to -1 and -A to 1. Then abs is a bijection from A*R to R and a surjection from R[A] to R, while it's neither an injection nor a surjection from R to R. We can define |x+yA| to be |x|+|yA| = |x| - |y|, which is harder to visualize. Other than how weird and pointless it is, R[A] makes sense and is a commutative ring with a 1 isomorphic to R[x]/(x^2+x) also known as the split reals or R[j] given by the isomorphism of sending A to -(1+j)/2 where j^2 = 1 and j is not plus minus 1. and similarly C[A] is well-defined ring isomorphic to C[x]/(x^2+x) or C[j]
1:47 for those who don’t know about this, the “!” is the factorial sign. ex: 7! 1x2x3x4x5x6x7 = 5040
@davidradics9565Ай бұрын
So 5! is 1x2x3x4x5 = 120
@mythic31424 күн бұрын
@@davidradics9565 yes. and 52! is roughly 8.06 x 10^63
@y.kennard33816 ай бұрын
10:00 OMG that's terrifying... I really hope this parent didn't stop fighting... I teach math to 12-15 year-old in Switzerland, I know how parents can be annoying. But for ONCE that a parent has every right to be mad... I mean, we all do mistakes so it's "fine" that a 3rd grade teacher made this one. But once the parent contacted him/her... Just google it for God's sake !
@The-EJ-FactorАй бұрын
12:31 it’s saying they wonder why 0 factorial equals 1 not why 0 doesn’t equal 1 I’m a programmer but I can just assume this because who wonders why 0 doesn’t equal 1?
@superstas011 күн бұрын
lol yea
@carlosmanan21526 ай бұрын
Applying maths I can say that I only understood 0.08% of these memes, but I enjoyed anyway.
@THE_GREMLINZ_OFFICIAL6 ай бұрын
10:00 teach him that division is unmultiplication.
@newwaveinfantry83626 ай бұрын
1:09 - I think the meme is about wanting a general formula for this, which obviously doesn't exist. This was joked about in the video "Doing the World's Hardest Integral" by eigenchriss. 4:32 - You're being asked to prove that there is a maximal number, which is wrong. 4:48 - Bad ranking. Putting п and ф above sqrt(2) is so normie. Third root of 47 is really random, it should be in D. Also, root 11 should be higher than root 13 just because Z[root 11] forms a Euclidean domain, while Z[root 13] isn't even integrally closed. 7:23 - The lawful evil here should have been chaotic evil because it is easily the most chaotic and evil thing on there. 12:24 - IT'S NOT NOT EQUALS TO, IT'S FACTORIAL. 0! is 1 because it works recursively and also because it extends nicely to the gamma function. Г(x) happens to be (x-1)! when x is a positive integer. It is defined as that integral over there. Also, it is not only defined for z with positive real part. Г is defined for all complex numbers except the nonpositive integers. It is an analytic continuation of the factorial function onto C without {0,-1,-2,....}.
@alexismiller23496 ай бұрын
Lawful evil actually looks quite normal to me, maybe since it's a compact way of showing that stuff like the circle is closed topologically
@newwaveinfantry83625 ай бұрын
@@alexismiller2349 There is nothing normal about it. You can't just put a dot there and write it as a function with a preimage. It looks horribly confusing. You would NEVER use this notation in a topological context, this is something I can only imagine physicists do. Also, I forgot to mention that there is a general formula for 1:09 of sorts, and that's the sum of all antiderivatives of (ln(f(x))*g(x))^n, for n going from 0 to infinity, assuming absolute convergence over some domain for x.
@alexismiller23495 ай бұрын
@@newwaveinfantry8362 Well I study math in France and maybe it's a coincidence, but I've already seen this notation used exactly like this, or on more convoluted things (and being light-years away from physics). I could also say that it's well defined, it's compact, and if you're used to it, it's easy to parse (if it's followed by a set).
@totamelinda93816 ай бұрын
QED will always mean quantum electro dynamics like d6 will always be a dice
@thatoneofficialpianist6 ай бұрын
6:34 oh yeah, if someone didn't understand this, he says "the 90's summed up in one picture" and that formula equals to 90+91+92+93+94+95+96+97+98+99 which is the 90's all summed up. and that is one picture. mindblowing, right? Edit: another explanation! 13:37 if someone didn't understand this, if you simplify everything down, you get y=|y|, which should look normal. Actually, if you plot it on Desmos, nothing appears. but if you do y=|y| * +x-x *, then for some particular reason, this monstrosity appears. same with y=((y^2)/y)+x-x. P.S. if you plot y=(y^2)/y, it's actually just ǐ̴̧͙̮̲̙̞͓͈̝̈͌́͝͝ ̷̡̥͎̣̞̳̹̪̘͕͈̹̰́͐̑͗̏̕͠d̷̢̨̳̩̗̟͛o̷̢̧̢̳̙̮̦̩͔̻͍̲͙̙͔̍̓͛͑͋͛̽̓͜͜n̶̙̬̳̲͓̈́̉̀͂́͛͑̾̆͘͘'̷̗͍̭̹̥̖̌̉̃̇̌̍̂͗͌̌̍͌̆̂́̈́͠͠͝͝ţ̴̧̹͎̬̘͚̥̩͕̰̼̈́̕͜͜ ̷̗̮̅k̵̘̙̦̝͎̮͙͉͎͎̭͓̬̱̳̈́͛̂̈́͋̃̎͑̈́̂́̏͑͌̽͋͒̀̂̕ǹ̶̢̤̦͓͋̑̾͊̍͘͜ơ̷̧͔̲̣͚̰̺̜͙͎̪̱͓̣̘̣̯̅̆̐̓͂͊̏̈́̓͛͛͗̅̚͜͜ͅͅw̴̛̜̤̔̐͋͐̄̔̍̋ ̵̤̭̦͇̳̞͉͊̍̈́̇̽̉͌͊͑͋́͊̉͜ḫ̶̢͇͚̭̃̄̍ơ̶̧̹̣͎͇̰̭̲̜̲̜̜̻̥̯̭̋͆̈́̒͜͜͝w̸̲̬̖̻̭̞͚̺̘̰̘̿̂̇̐̀͛̎̈́̇̃́ ̸̡͔͓̇̉̑́͛̌̀͑̈́̕͘͠m̴͙͍̯̪̰͕̥̱̫̹̭͒̀̈̉̐͑̌͑̀̀͒̈́͑̆͒̈͋̍̈̐͜͠á̷͈̺͎̟̦̹̲̞̫̺̹͚̗̝͚̰̠̤̎̒͐̑̍̉̒̔͝n̴̯̳͕͇͖̠̫͍̖̺̮̭̼͇͈̯͚͙͈̊ͅỳ̴̧͎͔̯̘̟͖͕̍̉̓̂̇͌̈͂͛́̊̄̍͂͌̕͘͝ straight lines, but it still says "this equation contains fine detail ..." blah blah blah. now you know.
@TheChadOrange6 ай бұрын
I spent 5 minutes with my calculator trying to figure out what tf that one was about when making this video until I realized
@thatoneofficialpianist6 ай бұрын
@@TheChadOrange haha
@newwaveinfantry83625 ай бұрын
@@TheChadOrange It's because Desmos can't do algebra, so it can't figure out that y^2/y+x-x is actually just |y| and y=|y| is just the entire upper half plane. Instead of doing algebra, which requires AI, it just estimates everything numerically, which only requires a calculator.
@kristinborn888220 күн бұрын
@@TheChadOrange same
@ArnikaaaАй бұрын
0:30 personally, I’m a mix of “?” And 3blue1brown
@ianweckhorst32006 ай бұрын
Also if I remember, the integral evaluates to pi, so it’s just first 10 digits of pi
@personwhoplaysgames3324 ай бұрын
13:45 y^2 / y = y • y / y = y, y + x - x = y, so the equation here is just a complex way to summarize y = y.
@spectre44033 ай бұрын
Btw 2:40 is an SAT question where they got the question wrong lol!!
@jayxone6 ай бұрын
12:30, here’s an easier way to think about it, start with 5!, that’s equal to 120 now we divide by 5 to get 4! Which is equal to 24 then divide by 4 then 3 then 2 then we get 1!=1. Following the pattern of getting the (nth-1)! We get (1-1)!=0!=1/1=1 So 0!=1
@thepulsarx58963 ай бұрын
7:42 lits literaly just pi 🤓
@xinpingdonohoe39782 ай бұрын
Too simple. And why do they always pick π? Pick a different number for once. ∫[0,∞] 1-tanh(x) dx = ln(2) for example.
@lusr29232 ай бұрын
4:27 😊
@infinity1000A13 күн бұрын
0:04 me writing on desmos: ∞∞+1 *Realizing this equals the same*
@user-ro2tm3dp8x4 ай бұрын
1:28 is it somehow deep in the 0 point or is it just in shadow realm or how the hell is that possible distance to a point can't be negative
@omkumarsingh72 ай бұрын
what channel was in the 2nd quadrant at 0:28 ?
@drabsnow22545 ай бұрын
8:40 well it could be 2 to the power of -1/2
@ianweckhorst32006 ай бұрын
I’d block too 10:04, too tempting, but so so wrong, they quite literally never even touch
@THE_GREMLINZ_OFFICIAL6 ай бұрын
8:13 core
@CatritaAycock4 ай бұрын
5:54 time to learn trig for 11 YEARS or until your in 6th grade
@natebluefury199228 күн бұрын
Ah yes, ⌊Floor⌋, ⌈Ceil⌉, and 「Japanese」
@GamingDudeSUS2 ай бұрын
7:53 CP (In Geometry dash) [Gigachad]
@xinpingdonohoe39782 ай бұрын
I don't care, I'll take them all.
@axelinedgelord44596 ай бұрын
well, infinity + 1 doesn’t have a larger *cardinality…*
@kiti_cat5245 ай бұрын
8:12 walls?
@ianweckhorst32006 ай бұрын
The one question I have is why the third root of 47 was specifically mentioned, and alone in c tier
@Faroshkas6 ай бұрын
exercise list 5.3 n 17 in calculus by james stewart, 7e
@TheSheep16 ай бұрын
The first one could also be omega (the Greek letter)
@Yhp4206 ай бұрын
i agreed with everything at 4:53. but like why is the cube root of 47 there. was there something i missed in calc class or something???
@TheChadOrange6 ай бұрын
Idk actually, hopefully someone smarter does
@axelinedgelord44596 ай бұрын
looks really familiar…
@Iniosiun4216 ай бұрын
1:50 and 4! Hours = 1 day Hmm
@sportsloverbaseball6 ай бұрын
5:02 I’m confused
@Thatoneguy-pg3d6 ай бұрын
cool video
@BaldiReycaster6 ай бұрын
MEME ORANGE NEW VIDEO: MATHAMTHAMTH I AM BAC AT MATH
@lonelylord65815 ай бұрын
12:57 can anyone explain this to me??
@ianweckhorst32006 ай бұрын
Also I’m definitely chaotic neutral
@user-hs9xo1nw6q6 ай бұрын
6:59 Physicist :draw a parabola to cower the tomato now look from the perpendicular side no problems Hint you live in a 4d world hint time i am not going to explain this shit
@neinneinwirklichnicht-yh6ff4 ай бұрын
You do math 'cause it is fun. I do math 'cause it turns me on. We are not the same.
@annxu82196 ай бұрын
ω and ω+1
@missingno73136 ай бұрын
Does anyone have the answer for 7:43 ? Id like to see if im right. Thanks
@alexismiller23496 ай бұрын
Develop and split the integral, normally you should have the integral from -2 to 2 of an odd function, which yields 0, and the remainder is an integral of 1/2 sqrt(4-x^2). This is half of the area of a hemisphere of radius 2. The value is good ol' pi. 3.1415926535
@missingno73135 ай бұрын
@@alexismiller2349 Wow, thanks a lot. I still need to practice integrals, This is very helpful.
@quantumreaper55965 ай бұрын
i think its pi/2
@CatritaAycock4 ай бұрын
5:01 please explain
@GDVoid27296 ай бұрын
meth good
@magrohmax11276 ай бұрын
Infinity isnt a number
@annahanslope75287 күн бұрын
:|
@annahanslope75287 күн бұрын
>:(
@aperson68216 ай бұрын
this feels just like a bunch of stuff from r/mathmemes
@TheChadOrange6 ай бұрын
It mostly is. Most channels like me get our memes from reddit and Instagram
@aperson68216 ай бұрын
@@TheChadOrange okay fair, I just thought many of the memes felt familiar :)
@Questiala1246 ай бұрын
E
@Enlightenment01726 ай бұрын
Laughs in Ω↦Max(n, Ω)
@ActualDumBatcha6 ай бұрын
3blue1brown is so good ogn 0:24
@awaken24786 ай бұрын
Whos the one bottom left
@cdkw82546 ай бұрын
@@awaken2478 Veritasium
@cdkw82546 ай бұрын
And next to it is Khan academy
@52flyingbicycles6 ай бұрын
Saaaaammmmmeeee and I can confirm that I both like math and am good at math (got a degree in it 🙂)