Gauss Jordan Method to find Inverse #3 in Hindi (M.Imp) | Linear Algebra | Engineering Mathematics

[@_srashtigupta_]

thankyou sir for such great videos , and clarifying everyone doubt

[@MathComMentors]

Thanks a lot for compliments dear and Download and Share MathCom Mentors App for more Lectures, Notes, Important Questions from link.... lynde.page.link/ZmX1

[@jokeyjokey7956]

all 3 parts are awesome and 100 percent understamding

[@jokeyjokey7956]

great lecture

[@MathComMentors]

Jokey Jokey thanks a lot. Please share the channel with ur friends, classmates and Juniors..

[@uniquemathsbya.k7654]

Sir iske alabe v method. H inverse find karne ka by using et.

[@garimadhawan7909]

sir plz make video on curve tracing and double integration complete topic

[@MathComMentors]

Garima Dhawan Garima.. I m in process for making new videos.. Hopefully will upload all videos ASAP

[@garimadhawan7909]

Engineering Mathematics Simplified by Dr Goyal okk sir..thnk u 😊😊

[@MathComMentors]

check out the Double Integration Lectures bache at kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqKpkn55q9yNitE

[@mohebbe872]

Nice

[@sadiahabib5506]

When we are solving a system of linear equation using matrix column operation does not give correct result

[@MathComMentors]

sadia habib its always same... Please send me any solved question to prove ur point...

[@nalingoyal881]

Sir plz upload a lecture on double integration

[@MathComMentors]

nalin goyal will upload soon...

[@MathComMentors]

check out the Double Integration Lectures bache at kzbin.info/www/bejne/aqKpkn55q9yNitE

[@rishabhvishwakarma5084]

Sir as u have said we can make 1 only by two methods either by division or interchange why the other method that is why we cannot make 1 algebraically

[@MathComMentors]

Rishabh Basics yes u can also use that... But the answer will be different from student to student... That's why... We should avoid that operation.

[@rishabhvishwakarma5084]

MathCom Mentors ohk thankyou so much for looking into my queries

[@rishabhvishwakarma5084]

MathCom Mentors sir i am having one more query related to this topic , why can't we use both row as well as column transformation in different steps as uh have mentioned it is becoz of symmetry to make Identity matrix bt by appying both the operation in "A" as well "I" parts ,eg {c1-c2 in A part as well as c1-c2 in I part }also in argumented matrix (A:B) I hope you are understanding my problem

[@MathComMentors]

Rishabh Basics main issue is in A:I form... The Rows are COMMON... So if we will strict ourself to Rows operation only... Then by default the operation will be applied to both parts of Augmented matrix... So we don't need to apply operations twice... Hopefully u got the concept.. Else u can Whatsapp me on my number

[@rishabhvishwakarma5084]

MathCom Mentors yes i know your method is esy and preferable bt im just asking we can do in that way also..?

[@ojasroy5543]

Sir how can we ask our doubts

[@classeswithanibarya8441]

Wow