not sure anyone could explain pi as succinct and lucid as you did. thank you.
@sistajoseph Жыл бұрын
Circumference is then the perimeter of a uniform one sided figure. Very helpful.
@armorvestrus41192 жыл бұрын
This was great and so well explained.❤❤❤
@dipu6174-t8n8 жыл бұрын
Important viewpoint. Nicely explained....Thanks.
@andredevouissexavierii897010 жыл бұрын
elegantly explained
@Krishnan1723 жыл бұрын
which application are you using for this?
@Hythloday7110 жыл бұрын
Very good. You show for all circles the ratio is between 3 and 4. But is there a 'simple' argument for why for all circles it must be the singular real number pi ? Simple via 'scaling' ?
@pepemonjess8 жыл бұрын
This is fantastic, thank you!
@philipparanthoiene48926 жыл бұрын
Archimedes continued by dividing the hexagon sides to get a dodecagon (12 sides), then 24 sides , then 48 sides etc. From memory , after 15 doublings it gave pi to 6 decimal places.
@ffggddss5 жыл бұрын
Archimedes carried it out to 96 sides, so four doublings of the hexagon. And he calculated perimeters of both inscribed and circumscribed poygons, in order to get a bracketing pair of values between which π must fall. Not having decimal notation, he worked out a pair of fractions that he could prove bracketed π: 223/71 < π < 22/7 i.e., 3 + 10/71 < π < 3 + 1/7 This "squeezes" π down to about 3 significant figures, or 2 decimal places after the point. This video is actually doing a much simpler, easier-to-grasp version of that, using a circumscribed square and an inscribed regular hexagon, to arrive at 3 < π < 4 If he had used a circumscribed hexagon instead of a square, it would have complicated the process, and would have arrived at: 3 < π < 2√3 = 3.464... It was better to do it the way he did, because it's supposed to be an introduction to the concept, and his example was the easiest to comprehend, so as not to distract the student from the essence of the technique. Fred
@davidschandler483 жыл бұрын
This is just the first of a 3-part sequence of videos. The other two complete a variation of Archimedes' method. They are intended for students at different levels.
@IsaacAsimov1992 Жыл бұрын
Excellent. Thanks!@@ffggddss
@fireofevender55154 жыл бұрын
You'll occasionally see a circle inside a square in certain temples throughout the world. Some believe that a squared circle represents a sacred place where heaven & earth meet.
@siten16 жыл бұрын
Idk if I am wrong but your logic for saying that pi must be < 4 being it can fit inside the square is wrong because you can actually fit a square inside that circle that would still have a ratio of 4.
@arthurkernkamp50625 жыл бұрын
The important point that you are missing is that the circle and the square must have an equal diameter to use this visual argument. You're right, you could indeed fit a square inside of the circle, but that square would have a smaller diameter than the circle, meaning you cannot easily compare the ratios visually. The reason the creator of this video can say pi < 4 is because you can clearly see that when the shapes are of equal diameter, the perimeter of the square is larger than that of the circle.
@cutelilly1000vedios11 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the help
@nikobaka52724 жыл бұрын
Thanks man
@craftyourlife013 жыл бұрын
I didn't understand 😕
@davidschandler483 жыл бұрын
I am establishing that there is a fixed ratio of perimeter to diameter, and that the first digit of that ratio is 3. Go to my other videos in this series to get more digits.
@flatearthasmr90345 жыл бұрын
C/D = 3.17157
@charleschoice47058 жыл бұрын
Pi equals infinity!
@oliviervos12168 жыл бұрын
Charles Choice not true at all
@charleschoice47058 жыл бұрын
Alter Ego you need more study there is no end to pi
@oliviervos12168 жыл бұрын
Charles Choice Yes, it has an infinite amount of decimals, but it's not equal to infinitey. Infinity in an infinitly large quantety