matrox millennium G200 AGP & AMD K6-2 500MHz - BENCHMARK - GAMING TEST

[@3dfxvoodoocards6]

Nice retro system and interesting benchmarks

[@user-kd1ho7gm7i]

It's a fine card. I've got a PCi one, paired with a K6-2 400 (66mhz bus) on a Socket 7 board (without AGP slot). It does its job, making QuakeII and Unreal quite playable. Your system, with a 100mhz bus CPU and AGP, makes it even more capable.

[@retrohardwaregarage171]

Hi, yes you are right, with the 100MHz BUS it has an extra boost....

[@zakkos]

Like 👍

[@efpcvintageplanet3406]

Un bel sistema datato 1998🤩. In Direct3D la qualità di questa scheda si vede tutta. Va anche ricordato che all'epoca non era certo economica. Ottimo video anche per confrontare i punteggi col mio Pentium 2 400 dove ne ho testata una uguale 😉. Buone vacanze Salvatore a te e famiglia ❤

[@retrohardwaregarage171]

@@efpcvintageplanet3406 grazie Enrico, anche a voi tutti, un saluto!

[@retroboby007]

Nice video, man. I have a HP Vectra with Pentium II 350 (3.5x100) and integrated Matrox G200. But I got much lower scores then you. In 3d mark 99 I got 1600+ video and 3000+ CPU, compared with your 2100+ video and 6000+ CPU scores. The Pentium II 350 could slow that much my system, compared to the AMD K6-2 500 from your system?

[@retrohardwaregarage171]

Hi, I'm glad you liked the video. The Pentium II is a great processor but the difference compared to the K6-2 is 150MHz which in my opinion could justify your scores, then you have to consider the fact that the G200 Integrated has the memory on the motherboard and not via AGP which has a preferential channel...