Slow motion video of test in which McCurdy's Armor™ defeats a rocket propelled grenade (RPG).
Пікірлер: 157
@Nosht9 жыл бұрын
The slat armor did its job. The electrodes from the fuze where cut resulting in that the shaped charge flattened itself against the armor before detonating. If the warhead had worked properly, we'd see a metal jet shooting through the thin metal armor.
@alloy2997 жыл бұрын
It lets the fuse (the pointy thing that activates the warhead) pass but damages the warhead that is wider, that way when the fuse finally hits the armor and activates the warhead, it is either not functional or has been deformed/broken, making it less effective.
@alloy2997 жыл бұрын
Normally, yes.
@DanFrederiksen6 жыл бұрын
Wiki says it only works about half the time. And I would have less faith in it than that in practice.
@_armoredglasscannon25204 жыл бұрын
interesting
@hazardous4584 жыл бұрын
Dan Frederiksen Well, slat armor can destroy a projectile no matter the angle, a perfect hit like that would stop it, a non perfect hit can also destroy it, just a hit to the main body but the fuse staying intact will negate a jet from forming. If the contact fuse hits the bar, it can cause a imperfect jet that won’t be able to penetrate armor.
@testfortester71315 жыл бұрын
0:12 it worked
@ID-84913 жыл бұрын
Just to clarify a popular misconception. RPG (meaning the Russian designed anti-tank weapon) does not stand for "rocket propelled grenade". RPG stands for Ruchnoy Protivotankoviy Granatomyot which means handheld anti-tank grenade launcher.
@privateassman88393 жыл бұрын
Yes. But RPG still stands for "rocket propelled grenade" when used to describe the broader category of shoulder-mounted shaped charge projectile launchers.
@wotanscry15942 жыл бұрын
it not true - dont believe his lies! RPG stands for Russkia Peoples Golupe
@jimmylaze Жыл бұрын
It means role playing game actually
@deficator750 Жыл бұрын
it sounds awfully a lot like Rocket Propelled Granade
@NikoMoraKamu8 ай бұрын
actually is a recoiless gun , there are no rockets used to launch this devices is an explosion inside a tube that shoot the explosive head , thats why they have a shit ton of backblast
@AbsurdJosh10 жыл бұрын
Should of shown what the armor looked like after.
@borissciaroni532 жыл бұрын
Yes, and explain the type of armour (thickness, material, ...)
@Revivethefallen2 жыл бұрын
They never do
@West_Coast_Mainline Жыл бұрын
As seen in the video, there isn’t a jet going through
@TrungNguyen-uf8cv Жыл бұрын
Dent, but no penatration.
@zuludeltanovember Жыл бұрын
should have
@Sharpshooter991005 жыл бұрын
clearly mesh deformed the shaped charge so it malfunctioned
@cartersharpnack3 жыл бұрын
That's the point...
@357Maxim7 ай бұрын
Slat armors are effective against RPG, but not against more modern rocket/missile. Also, slat armors have a 45-55% efficacy: If the piezo hits the slat, the shape charge will trigger and punch through 300-400mm RHA. Good vehicle design, base armor, Add-on armor, spall liners, FSS (...) shall be part of part of the protection package.
@marleyboy77327 ай бұрын
All this time I though some of the military must be poor to be using grandmas old bed frame as a sort of armor.
@ARMA2ARMENIA3 жыл бұрын
Very good
@michaelanderson309611 ай бұрын
Anderson's Armour: Wood /plastic composite 😮
@AlBundy31010 жыл бұрын
and what about the twin warhead rpgs?
@hazardous4585 жыл бұрын
Than you’re fucked
@_armoredglasscannon25204 жыл бұрын
It wont sadly. RPGs or anti-tank weaponries with twin warheads or tandem shaped charges are designed to defeat the slat armor, era, modular armor, and thickest frontal armor of any modern mbts like abrams and T-90.
@hazardous4584 жыл бұрын
_ArmoredGlassCannon [IRD] [NA] No, the point of tandem is to have the primary charge destroy era blocks and slat armor. Mbt uses composite armor. The first charge won’t have anything to counter so it would not have any effect other than weaken it a bit as the first charge is very weak.
@hazardous4583 жыл бұрын
Doom Guy yes it will help but it won’t counter composite as the other person said.
@BoraHorzaGobuchul7 ай бұрын
Something tells me most types other than heat are pretty scarce.
@n161615 ай бұрын
This that girl who hates her dead mom?
@quack8726 ай бұрын
that net is the one who broke down the rpg power
@22phan10 жыл бұрын
Slate mesh armor, no big deal
@77Avadon776 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the slats be tighter together?
@hazardous4584 жыл бұрын
No, the slats are spaced apart so the fuze wouldnt hit the bar, if it hit the bar, the fuze would engage thus detonating the charge and allowing a jet to form and penetrate vehicle
@Dellvmnyam7 ай бұрын
Who’s McCurdy?
@FlatRangeOperator2 ай бұрын
wow so this is why we installed those cages on our Matvs in 2010 in afghanistan! makes sense
@dibitafpsm-tr92926 жыл бұрын
the real basketball game
@Lemaure448 жыл бұрын
Very good weapon.
@Martin-wx8gd3 жыл бұрын
The armor worked
@Zabarotropitili4 ай бұрын
Old Soviet antitank grenade/missile do is job regardless of any type of grill bars or even another wall of protection. Just watch the videos on KZbin
@olexanderulyanchenko3102 ай бұрын
Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) Ой, у лісі, лісі, під дубом зеленим, Там лежить повстанець тяженько ранений. | (2) Ой, лежить він, лежить, терпить тяжкі муки, Без лівої ноги, без правої руки. | (2) Як прийшла до нього рідна мати його, Плаче і ридає, жалує його. | (2) Ой, сину ж мій, сину, вже навоювався, Без правої ручки, без ніжки зостався. | (2) Мами ж наші, мами, не плачте за нами, Не плачте за нами гіркими сльозами. | (2) Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) А ми з москалями та й не в згоді жили, На самого Петра у бій ми вступили. | (2) Москалі тікали, аж лапті губили, А наші за ними постріли били. | (2) Батько наш - Бандера, Україна - мати, Ми за Україну будем воювати! | (2) Ой, як мати сина свого поховала На його могилі слова написала. | (2) На його могилі слова написала: Слава Україні! Всім героям слава!
@miguellopez3392Ай бұрын
the armor is meant to damage the warhead of the anti tank munition without detonating it, the damage from the shaped penetrator making it much less effective, there is still a chance the munition can detonate before its damaged.
@KonuralpBalcik7 ай бұрын
yamuldu arakdaki demir daha ne olsun 🤣
@jsmithnevinsky6 ай бұрын
People inside still dead
@TEddisonTheEpic26 күн бұрын
No they would be fine
@jeffbanks99553 жыл бұрын
so it doesnt work then?
@cartersharpnack3 жыл бұрын
It deformed the charge and it actually detonated a bit earlier than it would have, causing a lot less damage and penetration.
@HHSTT3 жыл бұрын
What's the point? It still hits the armor plate.
@ariq42093 жыл бұрын
(Yes I’m late) The mesh deformed the shaped charge so it doesn’t form the metal jet which would cause penetration. Instead it explodes like a normal frag grenade which is harmless to tanks.
@HHSTT3 жыл бұрын
@@ariq4209 Oh, I see. Cool. Thanks, bro. Keep up the good work. 👍
@JohnHughesChampigny7 ай бұрын
Now try it with a modern tandem warhead as used by, for example, Hamas.
@odisy646 ай бұрын
why? most of what they have are single charge warheads.
@arielvaldman6 ай бұрын
Can you clarify by which means would a tandem charge do better against this setup?
@odisy646 ай бұрын
@arielvaldman has a higher chance of properly setting off the shaped charge but their is still a possibility of both warheads being damaged before contacting the main armor.
@arielvaldman6 ай бұрын
@@odisy64 vague answer for a clear question,if the precursor charge is damaged,then the main charge wont detonate,so again,how would a tandem warhead do better against cage armour?
@odisy646 ай бұрын
@arielvaldman because the first charge can still go off although its been damaged and not making a proper penetrating jet, the main charge can go off because the first one did detonate, just not properly.
@rjlee31129 жыл бұрын
Now how about they actually use a live grenade?
@kuhaku95878 жыл бұрын
+RJ Lee Because if it work against a live rpg it hurt your feeling ? There is a video in Afghanistan where a MRAP get hit by a RPG with that and it work perfectly fine, again.
@rjlee31128 жыл бұрын
Nop. The thing is that people seem to misunderstand what the armor is supposed to do. It works if it manages to deform the shaped charge or prevents optimal jet formation. That does not happen reliably though. And there are tests of this armor that show that even a deformed RPG can still penetrate the armor behind it. Most unconfined vehicles with high internal volume will be fine even without this sort of additional protection. Its used because its cheap and it does have a chance of reducing damage to the vehicle itself. Its not, never was and will never be an actual safeguard from anti-armor weapons.
@kaim2688 жыл бұрын
+RJ Lee well wouldnt you rather have a, lets say, 40% chance of stopping a shaped charge than having no prevention resulting in 100% penetration every time?
@daltonagre7 ай бұрын
Armour worked. I live in Brazil.
@HeirofGojira916 жыл бұрын
BUT what if it was MULTIPLE RPG blows? how many rounds would it be able to digest? ALSO what if the following weapons were used on the armor (assume 1 shot each) 1.) A 75mm Sherman gun firing the M72 AP round 2.) A 75mm Kwk L/48 firing Pzgrt 40 or 3.) A 76mm M1 Gun firing HVAPS or the 90mm M3 AP rounds? 4.) A 76mm PaK 42 of the Panther firing APCBC-HE 5.) A Sherman Mayfly 1c firing the QF 17 pdr using APCBC-HE 6.) A Tiger I 88mm firing Pzgrt 39 7.) A PaK 43 firing Pzgrt 39 8.) BS-3 100mm AP rounds 9.) 122mm BR-471 OR if it was subject to: 1.) HE barrages from the Sherman 75mm or 90mm HE rounds? 2.) HE barrages from the 88mm of a Tiger I 3.) HE barrages from the PaK 43 4.) HE rounds from the BS-3 5.) HE rounds from a 122mm gun cannon 6.) HE rounds from the 152mm guns
@russianmilktruckmafia18136 жыл бұрын
That's an interesting question, all the rounds you first mentioned are AP, either solid shot or with filler which would penetrate the armor without trouble, but the thing is that the RPG fires a chemical round, that is a HEAT warhead that depends on an explosion inside the warhead to shoot molten metal onto the armor to achieve a penetration, a HEAT no matter the speed or distance (the RPG's rockets actually travel slower than a 9mm bullet) will always achieve the same results unless it is detonated early or the warhead gets damaged before impact (as seen on the video). AP/Solid shots and penetrating rods rely on kinetic energy to achieve a penetration and can only be defeated by armor plating, that is Rolled Homogeneous Armor (solid steel alloy) or Composite Armor. Then onto the HE barrages, these do not penetrate but detonate on impact, if they are strong enough they can deform the metal or cause a concussion that will cause internal damage on the vehicle. A Sherman 75mm HE wouldn't be too lethal whereas a 152mm HE round can cause nasty damage by concussion.
@HeirofGojira916 жыл бұрын
Hmm what about REPEATED BLOWS FROM HE 75mm Sherman shells? So direct repeated barrages? Or at the very least internal damage and crew casualties would be inevitable? Or the armor will eventually give in? Given I thought hmm - if the SLAT armor could endure well a fair amount of firepower ...
@whatisbow28656 жыл бұрын
Who uses dinosaur era tanks anyways? This is for modern combat.
@kristijanmedved60665 жыл бұрын
Foom-zilla ゴジラ honey all the tanks you named would be long destroyed before they even get in range of their guns...
@masonhidari5 ай бұрын
we got a Warthunder player that plays too hard here
@spanksmcgee5 жыл бұрын
Rip McCurdy
@acegentry91517 ай бұрын
Nah McCurdy Big Chillin
@spanksmcgee7 ай бұрын
I don't doubt that@@acegentry9151
@lukaskaucik86166 жыл бұрын
That seemed to be HE round not HEAT to defeat armour...
@kristijanmedved60665 жыл бұрын
Lukas Kaucik its heat but mesh deformed the shaped charge so it malfunctioned
@hazardous4584 жыл бұрын
Lukas Kaucik The slat armor destroyed the body of the heat round so the heat round blew up on itself without forming a jet.
@West_Coast_Mainline Жыл бұрын
It is heat, the at part got screwed up by the cage
@lukaskaucik8616 Жыл бұрын
@@kristijanmedved6066 it clearly did not...went right trough the mesh...
@eane7238 Жыл бұрын
@@lukaskaucik8616 no. The shell was damaged by the slats and didn't function correctly.
@ArkkitehtiMark7 жыл бұрын
fail
@FanBoy_TOPGUN Жыл бұрын
No its not. It didnt penetrate
@CHEVI7899 жыл бұрын
how pathetic, those slats had to be closer, knew this was going to fail after seeing the distance between the slats.
@alexvandeburg4027 жыл бұрын
It didnt.
@davem30317 жыл бұрын
It didnt fail....the warhead blew up outside and didnt penetrate the main armor. The slate armor worked.
@CHEVI7897 жыл бұрын
Dave, are you fucking blind?, it went straight through the slats and hit the target then exploded, wtf?.
@9192939fuck6 жыл бұрын
Er no, the slats job is to deform the shape of the heat warhead and it will malfunction or explode outside the actual armor , lets say the heat round hit at the bar itself and detonated as usual it will still go through all that armor
@hazardous4584 жыл бұрын
@@CHEVI789 Are you fucking stupid? Slat armor is made to destroy the warhead thus not allowing it to create a bean to penetrate, if it failed, you'd see an explosion on the other side.
@dejandimoski46057 ай бұрын
This is a total FAKE ! In the sense that it can't be a normal shaped charged PG 7V or whatever model of the grenade since these slats did nothing but shave away some of the metal casing of the top part of the grenade which couldn't mess up the internal set up of . This one looks more like an ordinary High Explosive grenade then a Cumulative one 🤔
@BoraHorzaGobuchul7 ай бұрын
What's the he variant of the grenade called then?
@dejandimoski46057 ай бұрын
@@BoraHorzaGobuchul Modified, what else?! Dimwit
@miguellopez3392Ай бұрын
lol you cry a lot for not understanding that if a shappd penetrator gets deformed, its no longer a shapped penetrator.