Related Videos Regression: kzbin.info/www/bejne/kKS2l2R8ba57mtU Correlation: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppa5q3iCobl6e5Y Mediation Part 1: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5nZpZeeh8mXqJY
@leemarkgeverola4849 Жыл бұрын
Moderation analysis po sir paturo ☺ learned a lot sa videos nyo po more power 💪
@Renzlouis26 Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Hope this video about moderation helps. Moderation - Part 2: Reporting Moderation Results in APA Format (Taglish) kzbin.info/www/bejne/aJqQinqbnLF3ers
@Renzlouis263 жыл бұрын
Thank you for supporting our channel! We accept donations via GCash and BPI. GCash: drive.google.com/file/d/1jfWoveLU95LcK4AgpTAoxCMbGRz_6HsW/view?usp=drivesdk... BPI: drive.google.com/file/d/1eCelK140-t64yKqqRXAAd3H4GvXsZjP5/view?usp=drivesdk Thank you and God bless!
@lemagne480124 күн бұрын
Meron po ba nung version ni Baron and Kenny?
@biznislessonmadeeasy768110 ай бұрын
can we add support literature to our full report/writeup?
@CyrilJan083 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir. Tanong lang po sir. Anong magandang explanation pag no mediation?
@Renzlouis263 жыл бұрын
Kapag no mediation po, masasabi natin na hindi ine-explain ni Mediator ang relationship ni IV and DV. Kumbaga wala siyang role sa relationship. Si IV po talaga yung predictor ni DV at hindi si proposed mediator.
@CyrilJan083 жыл бұрын
Salamat po ng marami sir 😊
@CyrilJan083 жыл бұрын
Yan po kasi ang result sa study sir nag no mediation siya. Salamat po ulit sir 😊
@micahangela1645 Жыл бұрын
Hello po, Sir Louis! Bakit po naging 0.48*** yung B ng path a dito sa Mediation Part 2, pero 5.48*** po sya sa Mediation Part 1 na video? Saka po yung indirect effect, which is path a x path b po ay 0.48 x 0.08 po ba? Ang lumalabas po kasi 0.0384, pero ang nakalagay po sa video ay 0.47? San po yun galing sir? Thank you po!
@micahangela1645 Жыл бұрын
Ahh nagets ko na po Sir Louis bale 5.4804 x 0.0849 po pala kaya naging 0.47. Pero bakit po naging 5.4804*** yung estimate ng path a? Akala ko po less than 1 lang? Yung dito rin po na nakalagay na B sa path a ay 0.48? Sir, sorry po pero lost po ako. Pasensya na po sa mga questions, ngayon ko lang po kasi pinag-aaralan itong mediation analysis para sa research namin. Salamat po!
@kevincaratiquit91483 жыл бұрын
thanks sir. learning a lot. baka pwede parallel mediation analysis nmn po. 2 or more mediators po. kung paano gwin s jamovi at interpret 😊
@cristianflores59942 жыл бұрын
Sir what would be the interpretation kapag po ang path a ay negative value then ang path b ay positive value?
@Renzlouis262 жыл бұрын
Hi Christian! Correct me if I am wrong but I believe we have met before in Letran. This type of result suggests that if the IV is high, then the mediator and the DV are both low. Conversely, having low score in the IV would mean that the mediator and the DV are both high.
@cristianflores59942 жыл бұрын
@@Renzlouis26 Hello sir, yes we've met in Letran Calamba last 2017, if im not mistaken 😊 And thank you sir for this info, ive utilized mediation as an approach for my masters thesis, and your lesson helped a lot 😊
@craftysquire2777 Жыл бұрын
Hi sir Louis! Good day po. pa clarify lang po dito po ba sa preacher and hayes nad medition method gumagamit parin sila ng regression sa pag determine ng impact ng mga variables sa path a, path b at path c'? Thank you po! :)
@maryannporlay Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir for this very helpful video. May question lang po sana Sir, is it okay to run mediation analysis using the overall data obtained? Even the variables (IV, DV, M) have sub-variables/parameters? Will use the total data, and not per sub-variables?
@Renzlouis26 Жыл бұрын
You can run a mediation with all items involved using structural equation modelling. One weakness of using process (the one I covered in this video) is that it only involves the totals/means. 🙂
@maryannporlay Жыл бұрын
@@Renzlouis26 Thank you so much sir.
@autumnletter58612 жыл бұрын
Good day sir. Paano po kapag hindi na meet yung assumptions required to use mediation analysis (normal distribution, homoscedasticity, etc). Meron po bang non-parametric equivalent ito na maaaring gamitin na test po? Thank you.