Medieval Antisemitism: An Introduction | Dr. Lackner

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Hello everyone! What are your thoughts on this awesome lecture by Dr. Lackner? He is the first of many that will appear on this channel lecturing us and guiding us through Antiquity and the Middle Ages which are two eras that we all love. For more reading materials and for more information on Dr. Lackner check out the video description above! To support the channel check out the links below! Patreon Account: www.patreon.com/The_Study_of_Antiquity_and_the_Middle_Ages For awesome history merchandise like hoodies, shirts, mugs and etc: spqr-emporium.com?aff=3 *Disclaimer, the link above is an affiliate link which means we will make a small commission from your purchases, just another way to support the channel!

[@seanmccann8368]

Fabulous upload, thank you Nick and Dr. Lackner.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

@@seanmccann8368 thanks for your support and positive comment! Have a wonderful day and enjoy!

[@sairadha674]

Hi, I suggest 'constantine's sword' by James carroll.It is very well researched book on anti semitism.It is available on Scribd

[@revdurden198]

The Study of Antiquity and the Middle Ages Awesome lecture.. Another good philosopher whose work is one of the best today on anti semetism is Dr. E. Michael Jones .. He has a few books on the subject completely sourced. Amazing is all I can say..

[@jubei961]

Amos 9:7 [7]Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?

[@spirithawk2418]

Listened to this today doing household work....has given me a spark of interest in finding out more on Jewish history during this period of European history. Thank you

[@NK-du7ng]

Thanks!

[@curiousmonster8221]

Realy impressed with that. Looking forward to part 2

[@leonchal]

I checked and….there’s no part 2? Kind of sounded like there wouldn’t be. But you should still do one! Please! It’s a very rarely talked about topic (positive relations between medieval gentiles and Jews).

[@jannatalis4697]

Really enjoy listening to your uploads, there's so much to be learned! I really like how you let your guest speak uninterrupted for a really long time. There's plenty of hosts that interrupt their guests, not let them finish their points or add pointless information. Hope to see more guests on the channel in this format.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Slimek The Bear hey, thank you so much for your support and compliments! I will definitely be having more guests in the future and will have more lectures like this in the future! Stick with us because awesome content is coming!

[@jannatalis4697]

I definitely will and no problem at all! I've been watching the channel for a few months now but didn't really comment until now, always happy to see a new upload.

[@slappy8941]

I knew a guy who had been kicked out of every place he had ever lived, fired from every job, and thrown out of every bar he had ever been in, but to hear him tell, everyone just had it in for him.

[@yungsouichi2317]

Was looking for this inevitable comment lmao

[@charsback]

Me too..he was also a jew...

[@thecontrolledmind]

It's because everybody else was crazy and stupid.

[@summerjacobson4577]

Sometimes people are picked on for being different. People like to put others down when they're lesser

[@Simon.the.Likeable]

Public displays of auto-erotic activity and questionable personal hygiene habits will do that every time.

[@baddbeliever]

The shaving of heads was a punishment and the reason they leave sidelock was a loophole around Caesars/Roman Catholic Church punishment. The actual mention if you hold your sidelock was about who all had long hair and long beards therefore all had sidelocks. Egpytians and Romans shaved, not Israelites. Also one personal observation:. In the States, you can find out someone is Jewish long after you know them whereas in Canada they mention it early on as a disclaimer, which is weird, like a cultural code of conduct as to not misrepresent identity.

[@qboxer]

That really depends where in Canada. In Montreal and Toronto, yes, people are more likely to lead off with their ethnicity etc. In the rest of Canada, it is less common for people to consider such things as important to talk about.

[@troydodson9641]

The first interview he had. Listened to so many, never started with that. Glory to the histories Edit: Wow, this is a touch more than my entire understanding of medieval jewish relations, and its in an introductory interview. More parts posted years ago. You men are far smarter than I, I'll read more into this. My Thanks

[@AllSeeingScorpio]

A very interesting presentation. I thoroughly enjoyed it. Thank you both!

[@KevinKindSongs]

It's really worthwhile to study the marketing/sales campaign tactics of Paul - contra-jewish culture at the time. He was very smart sales guy....plus, added "life after death" to "Jesus" sales pitch. Who wouldn't buy that!?

[@HistorySkills]

So glad I found your channel. Thank you for your hard work and dedication on topics like this!

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

History Skills we are so happy that you found us as well!

[@crystakovala2694]

Loved this lecture so much! Can’t wait for the next lecture on friendships and amicable relationships between Jews and Christians

[@andybeans5790]

@@madness5327 it's amazing how you can literally regurgitate the polemics the lecture detailed verbatim, without any sense of irony or self awareness.

[@pallasathena1369]

Time travelling back to the medieval times for a week would be horrific. Even if you hid or had no religion, the people back in those days were horrible.

[@SecondTake123]

People are horrible now 😂

[@MCDreng]

Eh... there's no such thing as Homo mediaevalis. People were basically the same back then as they were today. That is, they're born into the culture they're born in and their ideas are formed by that - just like we are. Don't let yourself think we've become enlightened and are no longer held down by old prejudice.

[@Artur_M.]

Really good lecture. I'm certainly looking forward to the next one about the positive interaction. I wonder will we hear about Poland in it.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Also, if you have questions involving this lecture, don't hesitate to ask them in the thread! Have a great day everyone!

[@Antbaca9]

Wow, love the production in these! Can anyone tell me who the artist of the sketch drawings is? It reminds of of Gustave Dore.

[@historicalminds6812]

Thanks so much for this video! Look forward to the next one :)

[@jmicone6895]

Very good overview. More detailed episodes would also be good.

[@georgeins.c.494]

Excellent study topic to get past the stereotype. More on this topic. Love to hear about your specialty also. Torpedo the censorship!

[@cristythiessen7613]

Thank you that was amazing

[@iananderson-ley1847]

I love this channel. Thank you for this awesome content.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Thank you for your wonderful comment and support!

[@simonekitson]

A thoughtful and well spoken presentation. Thankyou

[@teresalee9997]

Well done as always..Many thanks for sharing😊

[@thecontrolledmind]

Perhaps you could have an expert on to talk about historic Jewish attitudes to Christians also?

[@moonshine588]

David Hilton probably something like “they seem nice, hopefully they don’t kill us this year”

[@thecontrolledmind]

@@moonshine588 oy vey, always the victims.

[@PiergiorgioCraxi]

@@thecontrolledmind "Historic attitudes"?

[@andybeans5790]

What would the attitudes of Jewish minorities about Christians have to do with anti-Semitism except for their opinions on being persecuted? Must be a fucker for Christians who rely upon their persecution narrative to have it so thoroughly debunked.

[@bill9989]

David, I think you raise a good point and the hostility you've received in these comments supports that. Studies where other perspectives are taboo aren't really studies. So here's the first question: have Jews done anything to contribute to the hostility they received? Yes or No. If Yes, then let's explore this. Nothing dishonest in exploring this. In fact good scholarship requires it and it shouldn't be feared.

[@j.v.1093]

Second viewing of this one. A fantastic video.

[@sheilabarron5532]

Great information 🙏✌❤💙

[@d.c.8828]

Thanks for this! Shalom!

[@MyRealName148]

Simply great. It’s funny, I could tell the order in which you release videos based on the length of your beard....

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

I need to give it a decent trim.... eventually, haha.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Also thanks for watching and I hope all is well!

[@MyRealName148]

It’s winter, probably best you didn’t... thank you for all your hard work. Also to take the time to respond says a lot about you. I’m sure your a great man.

[@mikefoehr235]

Was it possible for Christians and Jewish people to be involved romantically and even marry and have children in ancient times?

[@sanchoohches]

Jews were taking Christian slaves and forced them to conversion in Visighitic Spain,

[@nietzschesmoustache3585]

"...cries out in pain as he strikes you."

[@Sammedine]

Maybe you should look up what Friedrich Nietzsche actually wrote about antisemitism.

[@sanchoohches]

And?! He had a boner for Jewish evolutionary strategy and wanted gentiles to act the same way. On the other hand Jewis ethics and double morality, as well as extreme tribalism is a poison. It's not Antisemitic to point out bad Jewish behaviour

[@stag6161]

Wait what happened to his accent?

[@personofinterest7918]

I always count how many times you say ladies and gentlemen. Lol. I am excited for this topic.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Ladies and Gentlemen! Haha! Thanks for your comment and support Tony, kick back and enjoy!

[@personofinterest7918]

@@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449 just got done. I really liked it. Nice to hear the subject from a historical perspective without a ton of present social and political piled on. I do disagree with your statement about the censorship being understandable. Censoring history is far more dangerous.

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

Tony Smith I understand what I had meant by that is that I understand the need to keep “hate” groups off of this format but unfortunately many WW2 historians have had their channels deleted so it is sadly a double edged sword.

[@greatwhitenorth5280]

Based Feudal Christians

[@bobhaverbeck7585]

Some actual discussion would be nice. As opposed to being lectured lol.

[@pallasathena1369]

It is so difficukt to tey to think how the people in the middle ages thought. I think all of us, Jewish or not would be horrified if we went back in time and spent a week with the medieval folk. I dont think empathy was high up on their list - they went to hangings, saw heads on spikes, bodies in gibbets... Altogether a terrible place to be.

[@sanchoohches]

If it was so bad why they were pushing so much to stay with Europan Christians?!

[@frankandstern8803]

I wonder if you gentlemen have ever heard of a film called the Conspiracy Liable? I saw it once here on You Tube but I think it was removed. Too bad. Very good.

[@izme4700]

Micah Ebion Try the one called Jewish ritual murder revisited it’s extremely good

[@lipnicky6043]

How about giving the definition of the word semite?

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

lip nicky here ya go! www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Semite

[@zhizhi9138]

WhAt is the definition?

[@lipnicky6043]

Semites are those that speak semitic languages. Arabic, Hebrew, and other middle eastern languages are semitic. To be antisemitic would mean to be against those languages. Semites are not a race or religion. The definition of antisemite that is being foisted on us is made up.

[@zhizhi9138]

lip nicky So if I learn new hebrew or Arabic I’ll become Semitic, isn’t it? That is very weird.

[@joni8768]

@@lipnicky6043 All definitions are made up. That is the definition of definition

[@Ruairitrick]

No discussion of medieval antisemitism can ignore the fact that Jews consistently allied themselves powerful lords and magistrates and typically worked as money lenders and tax collectors. It also a myth that Jews were always forced into these lines of work because they weren't allowed to own land. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Religion states that Jews "whether in Narbonne in 899 or Gironne in 922, in Trier in 919 or Worms in 1090, in Barcelona in 1053 or Toledo in 1222, or in early medieval England, were permitted to acquire and own land if they wished. Not only were Jews legally permitted to own land, they could acquire significant amounts. They preferred to hire tenants, sharecroppers, and wage laborers to work their lands. For themselves, they chose the most skilled and profitable occupations, foremost money lending."

[@YB7517167]

Emancipation... ever heard of it??? en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_emancipation

[@punchysonichu5395]

@@YB7517167 Reading his comment, I don't think Ruaritrick is denying that Jews were, at times, subjected to a range of discriminatory regulations. Rather, he is saying that the claim that Jews were forbidden to own land in medieval Europe is a myth. According to Ruaritrick's sources, this was not a restriction Jews were universally bound by (if it even happened at all). The source you cited (Wikipedia) does not contradict Ruaritrick's assertion. Indeed, I skimmed through the article, and as of 12/07/19, it does not appear to mention land ownership at all. It mentions dress codes, restrictions on religious practice, prohibitions against immigration*, and even offers some extensive counterpoints detailing the rights and guarantees Jews enjoyed in Poland - but nothing on land ownership. If I've missed something, perhaps you could cite the specific passage you believe is relevant?

[@YB7517167]

@@punchysonichu5395 um... Citizenship maybe??? For over a millennium Jews had no rights in Europe, do I need to copy paste the whole thing or explain the logic of my argument???

[@sidvicious6505]

@@YB7517167 hey homeboy. No body had any rights in medieval Europe(Exception Byzantine empire). The only ones that had a voice or individual rights, were the ones who owned land. Depending on where and when. Owning land wasn't enough, had to be Nobility other areas only the nobility could own or maintain land. In the cities traders could achieve a level of autonomy as long as they maintained their tax payments. Pretty much all the southern trade centers the Jews were given a section of the city often allowed to wall it off from rest of city. Not punishment . Was actually a protection precaution. Spain, Portugal, venice, and of course byzantines . Jews owned much of the shipping and made up a great deal of the merchants, and of course money lenders. In all these they for no benefit assisted the Muslim conquers to attempt to conquer these lands. In france. Chalamange began the use of Jews as tax collectors. Allowing these people enormous power and influence as well many opportunities to Profit from the tac collections and loans to cover taxes. Not all jews participate In blood rituals. But a large percentage do. If you know an othadox Rabbi that is into kahbal and cites the talmund then it's a strong possibility that he Is at least in the outer circle, if not involved himself. Its completely sad and sick, but the USA , Isreal (westbank), have more missing never recovered children each then the entire rest of the world annually.. the UK. And Poland were the hot spots in the early last century. Parts of Africa and China. At times had large children massacred at periods late century early 21st.. but these were traced even when the bodies weren't recovered.

[@YB7517167]

@@sidvicious6505 wrong citizens had rights it's a status you should read what citizenship means. It is true that most lands were held by the noble class (in other words all lands were technically owned by the kingdom, country, territory, state, province). Farming on any land was a right of the citizens (the most common job of that era). And only citizens had a right to be represented in a court of law (governing powers protection which may have prevented the purge, massacre and pogroms). All the rights you gave for example were in fact after the emancipation, so they can't be examples of Jews having rights prior to the emancipation. Do you have any sources to back up the numbers of your last claims or maybe I'll search for the numbers of missing people globally and compare I can't trust you because of the way you constructed your claim it seems like you made it up on the spot just because it confirms your bias...

[@MyDj56]

Nizzahon appears in more of my history channels

[@ivan55599]

It seems that some people in comment section think that Pilate didnt have any power to judge Jesus, and the jewzzz had true power.

[@sanchoohches]

Yes, they did.

[@bobhaverbeck7585]

Let's talk about their behavior pattern that causes the host country to despise them. The relationship dynamic is common sense.

[@sanchoohches]

No, that would be Antisemitic

[@BrianFullerPDX1]

This video starts at 8 minutes 40 seconds.

[@megaswenson]

Not for me... After sitting through TWO INTRODUCTIONS, I've had it. But thanks for telling us that EVENTUALLY he stops saying "Ladies & gentlemen..." and actually gets to the content.

[@moonshine588]

I miss you Nick

[@kanyekubrick5391]

The Jewish people have had it soooo hard throughout all of history. Waaay before the middle ages.

[@sandrothenecromancer6810]

Truly the 2% that controls the media, academia, burocracy and politics have suffered so much

[@YB7517167]

@@sandrothenecromancer6810 0.2%

[@pataniki8034]

broad walk thru those times-appreciated the balance-you would have had a home run if you had immediately done the other side interview-and played them both at once-but much appreciated the ties and telling-manythxs2both

[@pataniki8034]

interesting in broad scope of deep digging-yet me feels that eastern european history was not extensively explored-but western european countries were main focus-but looking forward to second part-also interesting that there was no mention of historical notes as to professions to which the j community was associated with and why there had been bans or restrictions on their intermingling--also agree with SLIMEK THE BEAR-appreciated the uninterupted aspect-an unfolding rather than a this to that and connect yourself-not an expert in this area myself-just a living history guy-who in the earlier years was exposed to this thread in eastern europe post ww2-but the eastern european historical references would add larger contexts due to immigration and internal practices of those communities-how they evolved and what were their chosen achievements-

[@revdurden198]

Great Vid. Check out Nobel peace prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s books on this topic . His work and yours would go hand in hand . Awesome

[@zhizhi9138]

Rev Durden Solzhenitsyn in Russian means “ lie-teller” by the way.

[@andybeans5790]

@@zhizhi9138 it means "someone who processes malt", a derivation of the verb солодить, which describes the act of making malt from grain. You are now a slightly less dumb troll.

[@wooderdsaunders6801]

Most midevil people were illeterate and heard the Bible theough priest. And as today I believe preachers / priest slant thier sermons. Because Jews became afluant and rich, non jews owe great sums of money to Chistians gave motive to antisemitism.

[@MrToddino]

How'd they get so affluent in such a short amount of time I wonder

[@learnedeldersofteemo8917]

Also they got rich off there hosts

[@sanchoohches]

Jews were simply exploiting their position and were extremely hostile towards non Jews. Acting like a victim while sporting tremendous power. Same as in uSA today and yet we can't stop hearing about Holocaust and Antisemitism. Jews are nor Christians but without Christ. Jewish morality stems from Old Testament and Talmud. It is racist and chauvinistic as fck.

[@KaranSingh-hi1nz]

Cue the modern anti-semites. You're gonna need to clean up some of these putrid comments.Despite that, thanks for the doc Doc!

[@punchysonichu5395]

I don't think censorship is ever the answer. Censorship merely plays into (one might argue, _justifies?)_ the fears which "the Other" harbour about Jews and pro-semites. If their facts are wrong, correct them. If their arguments are flawed, offer more compelling ones. After all, what is "bad" about anti-semitism? What is it we object to, really? It's not that we object to anti-semitism on the grounds that it is an attack on Jewish exceptionalism and/or Jewish in-group preference (this reading of anti-anti-semitism is, I'd argue, thoroughly anti-semitic!) Rather, when we object to anti-semitism, we are objecting to the view that certain groups might claim it is their right and their duty, to "clean" the "putrid" elements out of their society. We object to systems which state that, rather than respecting a dialectical coexistence with the Other, those who wield Power (the censor-state, the censor-church, the censor-comment/curator) should simply purge that which they deem problematic and distasteful. "Cleaning up the putrid"... hmmm, where have we heard that before?

[@e.priest8937]

The comment section is depressing. I don't think the commenters are getting anything from the video . They are just scrolling KZbin waiting for an opportunity to express traditional hatreds.

[@matt-xo2vr]

sounds an awful lot like the cremation of care ceremony that alex jones exposed

[@gzpo]

I see Religion as one thing, and what a person or group of persons do with it as an other thing. 💖😎

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

That is a logical stance.

[@gzpo]

@@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449 logos.

[@andybeans5790]

That's just redefining religion to exclude the political aspect all religions have always had, in an effort to avoid feeling blamed. Throughout the medieval period Christianity was a theocratic empire, thus its political actions are not just what "people do with religion" but what the religion actually is. I don't believe in taking on cultural guilt, Christianity has changed significantly over two millennia, but pretending it transcends the abuses sanctioned in its name is a dishonest position.

[@timbowman1577]

Perhaps the most striking example I’ve ever seen of non-Scholarship from a High School Student; Let aline a PHD!! I’m speechless…don’t you have to look stuff up before forming an opinion? There are so many Errors made by this “PHD”…I’ll just focus on one for “close reading” (that’s Scholarly talk Mr. PHD.). Okay, Transubstantiation is a New Idea/Dogma/Practice from The Catholic Church??? Uhhhh NO! Pliny the Younger’s letters to Trajan are the very First Independent Source confirming “Transubstantiation” existed less than 60-70 years after Christ’s death…and was practiced each time Believer’s gathered together (Church) and Pliny pontificates; “…they gather, sing songs, remember the fallen but they appear to eat flesh of a Baby (Jesus) and drink the Baby’s blood…” Look It Up! Didn’t they teach you and Miri Rubin in PHD School to look stuff up? In fact, the Lateran you refer to only ratified the word ‘Transubstantiation’ as the operative word (Dogma) each Christian Practices…and it was so overwhelmingly practiced for 1,200 years, NO One thought the Practice needed to be written down…like Jesus’ name “Is it 2 J’s at the beginning or is it one??” Mind-boggling, and to date, you have not jumped on the Internet (or Ms. Rubin) and looked it up…or asked a Christian Scholar????!!! Of course, doing the above would require you to stretch your mind a bit, put down the Cognac Bottle, and erase your fairy tales about something, honestly, you know nothing about. Go tell a Sunday School Class what you support and you would be laughed out the room. Incredibly irresponsible Scholarship…You should know better and Ms. Mary Rubin should know better. Scholarship is Hard! Try doing it sometime instead of simply ‘Making Stuff Up Suiting Your Agenda”. Horrible hour watching you build your Treasure Map…from scratch. Putrid Scholarship. Horrible reasoning >>>> Without a stitch of Fact!

[@RobertaSirgutz]

Why so furious? There's much truth, as well. What do you dispute, exactly?

[@RemoveChink]

Wait, by the Biblical account, who killed Jesus then?

[@jacoblackner8117]

In all 4 gospels, it is ultimately the Romans who kill him. In 3 of them, the Jews are not really involved in his death, at least not in any collective way. The pharisees and Sadducees raise concerns about Jesus to Pilate, but they were specific sects of Judaism, not representative of all Jews. Even then, they do not directly ask for him to be executed, and are not involved in the decision. Matthew is the one gospel where a mob of Jews are assigned some collective blame, but Pilate still orders the execution, and Roman soldiers are the ones to torture him.

[@colinthomson5358]

@@Sarcasm_Corporation - Oh really cause there's a famous quote by Cicero "Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many other gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills." (Oration in Defense of Flaccus) Cicero was serving as defense counsel at the trial of Flaccus, a Roman official who interfered with Jewish gold shipments to their international headquarters (then, as now) in Jerusalem. Cicero himself certainly was not a nobody, and for one of this stature to have to "speak softly" shows that he was in the presence of a dangerously powerful sphere of influence. and on another occasion Cicero wrote: "The Jews belong to a dark and repulsive force. One knows how numerous this clique is, how they stick together and what power they exercise through their unions. They are a nation of rascals and deceivers."

[@jacoblackner8117]

@@colinthomson5358Sort of. He is a criminal in two of the gospels, not a murderer. According to the texts they get to pardon one person, and they don't choose Jesus - the men were all imprisoned already and potentially facing death. So yes, they didn't save Jesus, but they still didn't kill him. Interestingly, this custom all 4 gospels mention, of pardoning someone every Passover is not mentioned in any other texts. Most historians think it is a literary flourish, and not based on a real practice.

[@colinthomson5358]

@@jacoblackner8117 - Yeah cause it is a strange practise that the Romans probably wouldn't agree to - although who knows maybe if they feared a revolt and thought it may calm things down.

[@sandrothenecromancer6810]

@@blueskinblake9935 Oy vey, if you don't cowtow to the tribe you are anti-semitic!

[@sjyavo]

Uh, transubstantiation was not a "new" doctrine. It was merely codified. This is basic stuff 🤯

[@jacoblackner8117]

There is more nuance to it than I say in this video, but to say that "it was merely codified" is misleading. Some believed transubstantiation all along, you are right - but many Christians did not. For many Christians (but not all), it becoming Church doctrine in 1215 was a big change.

[@andybeans5790]

I always find religious laws fascinating, theologically they are seen as defining their members, but historically can be seen as indications of how different traditions and doctrines and those that followed them were "othered" as heretics.

[@carolineleiden]

Very informative, but incomplete. Now do an episode on Islamic anti- Semitism.

[@labinotzeqiri3303]

You know that arabs are semites?

[@karimdelakarim]

Cool man.

[@rebekahhakeber5093]

I’ve learned more about this topic in 51 hours in the U.K. than I ever knew. Very much alive and well here too I might add. I googled words I was hearing and nearly fell over being its 2019 and all. But I’ve noticed the N word is super common here too so I guess disparaging comments are their culture. It’s been enough of an issue that I wish to leave. I don’t enjoy hateful people’s and I don’t like to spend money into an economy of icky hearted people.

[@aus71383]

Anecdotal experience isn't a basis for an opinion on an entire country of millions of people. The current year is also a logical fallacy. You could leave - but maybe instead you can stay and force everyone to conform to your standards. That might have long lasting effects on their impression on you though - so think it over. It may be difficult to find a country, or economy, completely devoid of hateful people, or icky hearted people.

[@brumafriend]

@@aus71383 If your response to someone saying "wow i see lots of anti-semitism and racism online, that's bad and shows racism is alive and well" is "ACTUALLY THAT'S NOT LIKE NATIONAL DATA, ALSO JUST BECAUSE IT'S CURRENT YEAR DOESN'T MEAN W̶E̶ PEOPLE CAN'T BE RACIST AND YOU SHOULD LEAVE THE COUNTRY" then I don't even know what to say. There's lots of issues in the UK with race and anti-Semitism but leaving the country isn't the answer. Neither is trying to downplay it.

[@aus71383]

@@brumafriend You could try screeching about it, and accusing strangers of it, and see if that helps or makes it worse. I'm guessing most innocent people don't like being accused of wrongthink - even if they don't agree there is such a thing. Moral grandstanding is a tough sell. The pity strategy worked for a while, but that seems to be going by the wayside in lieu of this new power grab. I don't think most people care about Jews one way or another - if that's anti-Semitism, then maybe it is rampant after all. If someone you don't give a damn about starts making a fuss and demanding that you give them special treatment because your culture and race is collectively to blame for a tiny minority of people who have arguably bad ideas, are you going to bow down and do anything they say? I'm not.

[@TheChutzpahGirl]

*Who did kill Jesus ?*

[@tollol3131]

Which jews ? TMH's elect or the azkanaz ? Who call themselfs jews but are not.......

[@westernman7715]

Have Dr Andrew Joyce on to discuss anti semitism

[@colinthomson5358]

It is only fair to hear both sides and Joyce is well educated on the subject. He can explain the why using mostly Jewish sources (incase anyone thinks he is biased)

[@Shattered0Platinum]

What is the other side to medieval European christians were antisemetic?

[@colinthomson5358]

@John Johnson - Why is it ok to criticise European Christians as being EVIL/ANTI-SEMITIC/BIASED/BAD but not ok to criticize other groups? Are you not a nationalist, John? So what are you an internationalist? A Globalist? Do you care at all about the destruction of unique cultures?

[@colinthomson5358]

@John Johnson - Oh but they rebelled against Rome many times slaughtering whole towns and villages. They still celebrate the rejection of Greek culture and the slaughter of thousands of Greeks. "Cyprus. In Cyprus a Jewish band under a leader named Artemion took control of the island, killing tens of thousands of *Cypriot Greek civilians* The Cypriot Jews participated in the great uprising against the Romans under Trajan (117), and massacred 240,000 Greeks" Also "They founded the Hasmonean dynasty, which ruled from 167 BCE to 37 BCE, being a fully independent kingdom from about 110 to 63 BCE. They reasserted the Jewish religion, partly by forced conversion, expanded the boundaries of Judea by conquest and reduced the influence of Hellenism and Hellenistic Judaism."

[@colinthomson5358]

@John Johnson - Also can you tell me what the festival of Purim is if not a blood libel against Persians? Can you tell me how the Israelites got control of Canaan? What did they do to the Canaanites? What happened to the Amelikites?

[@jackwhite7532]

This is the most one-side b.s. propaganda lecture I have ever heard. What a joke.

[@suichinggo8236]

Luke 23:27-29, Matt 27:25 Satan hated the Jews so much bec of their faithfulness to God, Jesus the promised Savior of the world, was born from their race. However, God had temporarily withheld His protection upon them, bec they roughly took responsibility for Jesus death, not knowing His TRUE identify, and had not thought of how much they will suffer as consequence. It's just so sad that Satan was able to use Christians out of ignorance. We should have remembered that Jesus has forgiven them.

[@suichinggo8236]

@paul The Gnostic The Jews are still upholding the Torah, that's why they are longing to rebuild the Temple where God dwelt among the Jews. IF God knows the end from the beginning, why would He made the covenant to Abraham that He will be the God of His descendants through Isaac, Israel, everlasting, if He knew He will reject them at the end?, Genesis 17:7. Unless you people believe that it's not true God knows the future, that He must change what He declared. Isaiah 46:9-10, Numbers 23:19

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

Oh now I remember why I didn't like your channel. There's no such thing as anti-Semitism there's only anti Nazism

[@jackwhite7532]

This is an anti-Christian attack piece. It is not fair and balanced at all. Shame on this channel for posting this anti-Christian propaganda.

[@englishcloud6299]

history isn't "fair and balanced", this is fact. medieval society was violently antisemitic. there is no way of getting around that. why are you being so defensive?

[@matthewperry5121]

The Papacy was always killing

[@studyofantiquityandthemidd4449]

I try to distinguish a "religion" and or "religious" entity from the actions of its members and followers. If we look at the Catholic church in the Middle Ages, I feel like we see a variety of peoples who did wonderful and terrible things for their own gain and or due to their interpretation of "religious" teachings. Even as an Atheist I try to distinguish an idea from an action if that makes sense?

[@JohnDoe-pz7xw]

Remember swej have been persecuted throughout history just because they're swej not because of their behavior😂 its everyone else's fault

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

This guy is a shill

[@cavramau]

What is a shill?

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

@@cavramau a schill is a useless idiot flunky of the bolshevik/zionist Central banking cabal and it is one of two varieties. It is basically a knowing or willing servant to the evil globalist while the other variety is what is called a cuckt and this kind of useful idiot is not willing or knowing and is utterly ignorant about just about everything going on and the geopolitical world and the conspiracy world. A cuckt goes about his day-to-day business completely oblivious to the fact that his actions are helping to enslave the world and commit genocide on all non-slave and nonsematic races specifically all Aryan European people. This guy is much too knowledgeable about matters especially being historian to follow in any but the first category. Also he has made multiple videos talking about anti-semitism and such and any comments directed towards him that say even the slightest thing about the central bankers or the Bolsheviks being Jewish or the balfor declaration or the fact that the Rockefellers Carnegie the bank of England and the Rothschild family and JP Morgan funded a large part of the Bolshevik revolution and were instrumental in bringing America into the first world war and engineering the second world war and inventing the Holocaust. It's funny because many things that are absolute truth and mainstream knowledge are called anti-semitic when spoken of and whenever someone calls anything anti-Semitic you can bet your ass that he is usually a schill because a cuckt wouldn't know the difference. Don't get me wrong I am not anti-semitic at all I love Arabs and Babylonians and Canaanites and Phoenicians and Assyrians! Actually there are many Jewish people that I love and have great respect for also but that doesn't change the fact that the majority of the worst atrocities ever committed upon humanity we're caused an engineered by people who were of Jewish descent whether the majority of the world knows it or not. the majority of the transatlantic slave trade was owned by these people and so was all the golden diamond mines of Africa and it is funny cuz white Europeans are blamed for colonialism and Germans are called so racist yet Germans never had one African slave to my knowledge. And most of the Jews that were supposedly persecuted during world war II were of German descent. That's what Ashkenazi are! Do a little research into the subject and you'll be very surprised by what the truth really is because it's nothing like what they tell you at all. Just think of it this way who are the ones who dropped the atomic weapons upon cities full of women and children? I'm pretty sure it wasn't the Nazis! And 60 million Europeans died in world war II alone and added to the 40 million that perish because of the Bolshevik revolution and the 20 million in world war I that's over a hundred million Europeans who perished in the 1900s yet they try to force everyone to focus upon the 1.8 million Jews who died which states lie and say was 6 million to such an extent that it's illegal to even speak out against this in many European nations. The truth does not need this protection only lies would need a protection of this nature. Think about it.

[@yahruisreal3786]

@@thorthelionkingodinson4385 A learned person, how refreshing; wait until they open up a Strongs Concordance and find out the definition of the N word🤣😂🤣all those books in the background and for what? 2 Timothy 3:7 “Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.” It's sad.

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

@@yahruisreal3786 yes and the very funniest part is the fact that just because people commit a crime that does not mean that one's whole race or family or neighborhood or any group linked to it is also guilty. So when you criticize the rothschilds are George Soros the Anti-Defamation league is Swift to jump on the blood even though one might not be anti-semitic whatsoever but just speaking the truth . and the complete hypocrisy of the whole situation is mind-blowing because people say whatever they want to about white people all day long but if you say something about anybody else Dennis racism period if so worried about anti-Semitism well how about anti-naziism?

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

he's lying not educating

[@thorthelionkingodinson4385]

Did you get my reply