Meghna Deka Decodes: 'Supreme' Verdict For 'Equality' - Muslim Women Entitled To Alimony| Blueprint

In this segment of Blueprint Explosive Exclusive, Meghna Deka will take us through the landmark verdict by the Supreme Court of India for 'Equality'. The Supreme Court declared on Wednesday that the "religion-neutral" clause applies to all married women, regardless of their religion, and that a Muslim woman may request maintenance from her husband under Section 125 of the CrPC. Some of the key takeaways of SC judgement:
- '1986 Act confers benefit of maintenance for divorced Muslim woman'.
- 'Muslim women can seek maintenance under secular provision of Sec 125 of CrPC'.
Watch the Times Now video to know more!
#supremecourt #supremecourtverdict #muslimwomen #righttomaintenance #timesnowshows #timesnowdebate
Times Network takes the lead with its ground-breaking innovation and disruption of a new content category. The Times Network channels, which have a global footprint in 100 countries, inform, entertain, and engage viewers of all ages with fascinating and intriguing content, news, and information.
Subscribe to our channel - / @timesnow
Check out our website: www.timesnownews.com
Facebook: / timesnow
Twitter: / timesnow
Instagram: / timesnow

[@sashisivasampohganesan9392]

Modi goverment jai hind 👏👏

[@baburajankalluveettilanarg2222]

😅😅😅😅😅😅.

[@angelbaybi997]

​@baburajankalluveettilanarg2222 laugh all you want but it's modi n bjp that is behind pushing secular laws n all are equal under the same law

[@pravinshirgaonkar6797]

Pappu will start crying now!

[@RD-ij2sz]

@@pravinshirgaonkar6797 Not only Pappu but his baap in narak ..

[@radhakrishnans9418]

This vedict is Mathetharam. Indian Muslims will appreciate this. Extrimists who support Rahul and India Munnani will not accept this. Rahul is interested on divide and rule.

[@mdbipulahmed]

Great verdict.ultimately justice for women.

[@soundarkrishnan8216]

Shame that the divorce had to go to SC to get justice

[@RD-ij2sz]

@@soundarkrishnan8216 Its the Congress party which changed the constitution to support Muslim fundamentalists. The Supreme Court has now given a big slap on Congress face .

[@sufeeljan3245]

Very nice decision

[@PK-fl1lm]

Wait for cry from fanatics

[@RD-ij2sz]

And cries from anti national Congress

[@baburajankalluveettilanarg2222]

Great Verdict. Muslim woman also eligible to get Justice just like any others

[@soumendranghosh6974]

There is no place of democracy and secularism in islam. Only shariya law and muslim country.

[@RD-ij2sz]

But Bangali people will vote of agent of Sharia TMC party .

[@mallikarjunangadi4246]

No place for practices found against the law of the land .

[@AR-yv3dj]

Constitution brigade...Bring it on 😅

[@monalisajuir]

One minute! What kind of a reporting is this?! Is the reporter trying to sensationalise the same verdict that has already been given by the Supreme Court in 1985?! The reporter must have heard of the Shah Bano case for the first time. But here the apex court has only reiterated the pervious judgement and explained it. It has not given any new verdict on the claim of maintenance of the Muslim women.

[@AR-yv3dj]

This news reporter is trying too hard to impress, but very poor presentation

[@jayantbakshi4664]

Congress bitching is misplaced as this issue has been ruled upon by the SC & shows no involvement of ND Modi or Amit Shah. As regards releasing the convicts linked to the BB case, they should ask the High Court.

[@ratnamanidhanyamraju4915]

But Muslim women vote for Rahul Gandhi.

[@angelbaybi997]

and the muslim law board is not a legal law board...means its just a name of a group just like rss group...it has no teeth

[@abdulmujeebn1809]

We stand by Almighty Allah's commandments and in case of husband divorcing, wife is maintainable till iddat period and thereupon it is illegitimate and haram for divorced woman to claim as she is not longer wife. However children have to be maintained by father upto certain age with certain rights of father. These injunctions are based on natural justice and equity, which we are entitled by Article 125 of our indian constitution as well. Hindu personnel can never understand our sharia as they don't practice monotheism. Planted debaters have no impact on our opinion till doomsday.

[@chrismartin1231]

This is the ritualistic aspect of religion you are talking about. Its different from the core aspect of religion, which is mostly universal in nature. India is not a theological state, with a state religion. So ultimately we ll have to move towards UCC under article 44, it might take time due to social inequality and acceptance, but in the due course of time UCC will be the norm.

[@dontexpectreply]

I'm reporting your comment and failing a police case tomorrow. This will be contempt of court. @abdulmujeebn1809 - this username and associated email id will be traced by cyber crime police.

[@mrseskasi]

India is a secular country that is run by the constitution not you sharia- paria

[@PP-zr3ih]

Ucc is the solution for this

[@PP-zr3ih]

Ucc is best answer for this