Birth right citizenship executive order decoding by Immigration Attorney | Somireddy Law

[@RahasRao-r8x]

Thank you Santosh Somireddy

[@ceosonicsolutions8693]

So, finally somebodys whos not fear mongering.

[@dik726]

The following countries have unrestricted birthright citizenship: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chad, Child, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Fiji, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Jamaica, Lesotho, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, Tuvalu, the United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Just by looking at the list , we know which country is the most abused. It is high time USA removes itself from this list and enforces the new change - “at least one parent should be a citizen or green card holder for the child to become a citizen”

[@raginivenkat5562]

There is not enough political support to make this constitution amendment from the democrats

[@whathashappened37]

White black entayyaa! Asalu valla country valla politics. Akkadiki velli naalugu rallu vesukuni venakki raavali kaani tarataraalu citizens ga vuntamento!!!! Meeru ekkadiki vellina penta penta cheyyatam common aipoyindhi

[@ramachaitanyag7856]

Thank you for the clear explination

[@ramsamn6345]

H1B and L1 are Temp visas..he missed that point.

[@satishm-d6o]

Right

[@jayendra9]

Santosh garu please make such more videos andi

[@ramsamn6345]

It’s surprising how this lawyer assumes everything wrong.

[@tarunchavali]

Attorney is making his best efforts, but doesn’t Trump have his legal advisors? Just asking?

[@karth33k]

So you mean Trump is so dumb to sign it on day one.!? Why don't you think the Congress and Senate are going to amend it?

[@FilterKaapi03]

Politicians often take actions primarily for hype and to spark debate. Trump is well aware that his executive order to block birthright citizenship is unlikely to succeed, yet he pushed it forward to reinforce his image as a opponent of immigration. Moreover, Congress/Senate/Trump cannot amend Constitution directly atleast without having support from 38/50 states which is impossible because 22 states already filed lawsuits against Trump’s Order.

[@rammanohar8161]

Pack your bags

[@shankarreddynallagundla]

What are you talking?

[@-pjtalks]

Ok uneducated 😂

[@rammanohar8161]

@@shankarreddynallagundla Emi ledu Reddy garu, I am saying the roosters have come home to roost. The party is over.

[@shyamreddy8131]

Right right

[@kirankumar-vx3dh]

Direct trump mama tho discussion pettandi anna, motham clarity vasthadi

[@vamsivalluru7764]

Ne laanti lowed galu yedi jargaali anukuntaaro adi jargadu,,trump mama indians ni manchiga chooskuntunnadu choooskuntaadu kooda.....us lo unna vaallu happy ga unnaru ....nuvu kulli kulli sachipo....india lo unna vallu yentha kull kull machina legal ga unna vall happy ga untaaru

[@ramsamn6345]

Forget abt the book ..read the actual executive order.

[@Here4Now]

Not complete info.

[@sivapothula8]

A president’s executive order is not enough to change the U.S. Constitution. Birthright citizenship is rooted in the 14th Amendment, which states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” To amend the Constitution, a formal process is required, which involves: 1. Proposal: • Two-thirds of both the House of Representatives and the Senate must approve the amendment. • Alternatively, two-thirds of state legislatures can call for a constitutional convention. 2. Ratification: • Three-fourths of state legislatures (38 out of 50 states) must ratify the amendment. This makes constitutional amendments extremely challenging, especially for contentious issues like birthright citizenship. Challenges to Ending Birthright Citizenship 1. Legal and Constitutional Challenges: • An executive order attempting to end birthright citizenship would face immediate legal challenges. • Courts, including the Supreme Court, would likely strike down such an order as unconstitutional. 2. Public and Political Opposition: • Birthright citizenship has strong public support. Changing it would likely provoke widespread protests and opposition. 3. Precedent of the 14th Amendment: • The amendment has been interpreted for over 150 years to guarantee citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil (except children of foreign diplomats). Overturning this precedent would require a significant legal justification. 4. Global Scrutiny and Human Rights Concerns: • Ending birthright citizenship could attract criticism from the international community, as it would leave many children stateless and vulnerable. Conclusion A president’s executive order cannot override the Constitution. Attempts to eliminate birthright citizenship would need to go through the constitutional amendment process and would face significant political, legal, and social hurdles.

[@tejaalla4355]

Valla country valla Istam nuvenduku feel avuthunav .....nuvu first india gurinchi alochinchu first

[@kirankumar-vx3dh]

@@sivapothula8 india lo chala constitution amendments chesaru in modi time , once correct leader vasthe anything is possible in world

[@sivapothula8]

@@tejaalla4355 I just share my insights why are you worrying about it ? I know very well I’m proud to be a Indian 🇮🇳wherever I settled.

[@sivapothula8]

@@kirankumar-vx3dh Agreed Bro 😎 👍

[@bandasantosh1584]

Evdra veedu…bondam gaadu…mudhuga vunnadu…pandhi laaga 😂😂😂

[@sanjeevinin-n2j]

I have a question. What happens to the babies born after February 19th ? Will they be considered undocumented even if the parents have legal status. ? Will the baby be given a SSN and a birth certificate?

[@rammanohar8161]

They will get H4 and EAD, can be DevOps resource/ scrum master/ PO in 6 months

[@avinsegi]

A birth certificate is issued by individual states and serves as proof of birth. However, it is not automatically recognized as proof of citizenship unless acknowledged by the federal government. With the Trump executive order, if it is neither blocked by an injunction nor struck down by federal courts, citizenship may no longer be recognized by all federal agencies after February 19, 2025. This would mean Social Security Numbers (SSN) and passports could no longer be issued based solely on birth in the U.S. If the Supreme Court reinterprets the phrase “under the jurisdiction thereof” and upholds the executive order, this change could become the law of the land. In the meantime, if children need to travel, they should apply for a passport from their parents’ country of citizenship. In this case, they would automatically become citizens of India, as statelessness is not an option. Same as middle east, Australia, NZ and UK There is a high likelihood that the Supreme Court will side with Trump.

[@ramsamn6345]

Yes that’s right

[@ManuSree-s7k]

@@rammanohar8161😂😂

[@srikanthdasari5737]

Sir akkada unnadi chadivithe ela sie

[@bhsnmurthy6486]

Evaru kaadu avadu anna, twaralo pirralu pagalakotinchukone yogam vunnadu jaagratta.

[@hanumanYouth-el5yw]

Right sir

[@bulletbike4]

😂😂😂

[@movieloverss889]

Hii bro 😅

[@Crk-f9b]

Neh, it has to go thru major Amendments. Do you at least know how Amendments take place.,3/4 states ratify with population.