Menjawab Tun M, Kassim Ahmad & Anti Hadis - Ustaz Salman Ali

[@sangsakabangsa7798]

Kenapa nk memaksa orang lain yg tolak hadis utk ikut cara syariah? Sehingga nk mengkafirkan sesama Islam? Golongan tolak hadis tak pernah pun memaksa golongan syariah ni ikut cara mereka.. kerana orang syariah ini lah kenapa orang bkn Islam takut nk mendekati Islam.

[@arharamain6367]

👍 semoga kita semua diberi kefahaman didalam agama ISLAM, insyallah....

[@aburatyadas7818]

MasyaaAllah, barakallahu fiik Yaa ustazd Salman, semoga Allah jaga antum

[@zacksmile896]

Al-Anaam 6:50 Katakanlah; Aku tidak mengatakan kepada kamu perbendaharaan Allah ada di sisiku dan aku pula tidak mengetahui perkara-perkara yang ghaib; aku juga tidak mengatakan kepada kamu bahawasanya aku ini malaikat, aku tidak menurut melainkan apa yang diwahyukan kepadaku. Bertanyalah : Adakah sama orang yang buta dengan orang yang celik? Tidakkah kamu mahu berfikir?

[@muhammadekhwan9576]

Kalau macam tu lidah guru guru tafsir Quran pun takboleh dipercayai la sebab tak berintegriti. Hanya lidah Muhammad SAW saja yang berintegriti. Takbir! Sokong Ustad. Pembela agama Islam!

[@mrzainal4617]

USTAD SALMAN , YG TERBAIK YG PERNAH SAYA DENGAR CERAMAH2 AGAMA DIMALAYSIA.

[@ishakyahya8342]

Fahaman mereka yg sekongkol dg Kassim Ahmad ini sungguh menakjubkan. Mula2 mereka bersama Kassim secara total tolak hadis...jelas2 melanggar perintah AlQuran supaya taat kepada Rasul. Apabila dikatakan kalau tak pakai hadis, bgmn cara solat, cara puasa, haji dsbnya. Kesudut, lalu mereka adjust, katanya kami terima hadith tetapi menolak hadith yg berlawanan dg AlQuran, tetapi masih menyalahkan para ulama besar. Apakah pendirian ini baharu, apakah ulama dahulu tidak pernah ambil kira tentang yg mereka katakan.Apakah mereka tahu disana ada kategori dhoif (lemah) dan maudhu' (palsu) yg semua ulama hadith setuju tidak boleh dijadikan sandaran hukum. Kenapa sampai menolak hadis2 sohih yg jelas2 datang atau telus keNabi. Cuba fikirkan, bagaimana mengambil secara tepat maksud ayat2 Quran, kalau tidak menerima pencerahan melalui hadith atau sunnah. Didalam keadaan dibimbing oleh sunnnah pun timbul kesilapan, apalagi kalau hanya ditafsirkan ikut akal dan nafsu. Ulama2 besar dulu tidak silap dg berpegang kepada hadith dan sunnah Rasul. Yg silap besar adalah 'pengikut Kassim Ahmad' yg hanya tahu hujjah KA yg kepala batu itu.

[@malayneum]

Quran tu tak lengkap ke? Apa gunanya Allah turunkan Quran kalau perlu beriman dengan hadis bukhari pulak?

[@fiziradzi945]

Maka kepada perkataan apakah selain Al Quran ini mereka akan beriman? Surah77:50

[@as-zm8pt]

Diorang ni cerita seolah2 hadis lagi penting dari al quran. Hadis pun tk salah, manusia ni yg pandai2.... hadis kan penerangan dari al quran juga, mentafsir maksud apa yg ada di dalam al quran, benda yg penting dalam hadis kita ambil la mcm cara2 sembahyang, sunnah nabi yg lain dari konteks tu tk perlu lah beriya2...sbb tu hadis ni utk org yg betul2 dah mahir al quran je. Bukan yg suka goreng2 ni, lepas tu ambil duit gaji sebab bercakap, tk ke munafik tu ustaz2

[@aansky]

Orang orang anti hadis itu kita anggap saja orang bodoh lagi sombong, krn mereka tidak mau di atur, mereka mau tentukan sendiri amalan mereka, kalau mereka suka mereka ikut, kalau gak suka satu sunnah dlm hadis maka mereka tolak sunnah itu. Mereka menuhankan ro'yu dan hawa nafsu disamping Allah swt.

[@halifzent2686]

sudah di beri peringatan tapi masih mengikut nafsu syaiton, kita berlepas diri dari mereka

[@badangbadang7697]

terbaik ustaz salman ali ni...teruskan dakwah ustaz..

[@bahterasamudera1977]

MaasyaaAllah..baarakallahu fiik..

[@mahariism]

"Lidah yg berintegriti" Kita tak menafikan "lidah" itu tapi mengapa mesti disahkan oleh "lidah" Bukhari Muslim dan yg lain2 itu? Bukhari Muslim dan yg lain2 tu siapa?? Nabi jugak ker?? Hujjah yg sekadar mau menegakan benang yg basah. Sila layari "HADIS:SATU PENILAIAN SEMULA" oleh sdr Kassim Ahmad. Semoga dpt pencerahan hal isu hadis ini. Segala puji bagi Allah.

[@nurrulmamat8034]

diamlah. baik diam. ada cara mentarjihkan hadis. dia bukan nabi tp org plg rapat dgn nabi. itula cara kita nk define kedudukan hadis. ni pi blajaq la

[@mahariism]

Paling rapat dgn nabi? Org2 tu timbul dlm 200 tahun sesudah nabi. Rapat apa kebenda nya. Siapa yg kena blajaq ni? Lain kali baca tulisan kassim ahmad tu dulu.

[@ProfanzMotion]

mahari jofar saudara saya faham Kassim Ahmad mahu hadis dinilai semula...tp apabila yakin Al-Quran Kalamullah maka harus beriman dgn ayat Quran 4:59 apabila berselisih ttg satu perkara perlu kembali pd jalan Allah dan RasulNya 4:64 juga bila nabi Muhammad saw memutuskan masalah tidak Ada keberatan di dalam hati ini menerimanya...juga tugas nabi bukan sekadar penyampai Al-Quran, 2:151, nabi perlu mengajar Al-Quran, Hikmah(Sunnah), juga mengajarkan apa yg xdiketahui yakni ilmu syariat Islam, terutamanya Cara solat, bilangan rakaat yg xdicatat dalam Al Quran, wajibnya beriman pada nabi Muhammad saw maka kita wajib menerimanya 94:4 dalam syahadah juga dlm azan, jika xmenerima hadis mana mgkin kita tahu cara solat sebenar, jga xtahu alfatihah wajib dibaca...baiklah jika masalah imam Bukhari yg menulis hadis pd 200H ke atas, tp hadis yg ditulisnya terkandung semua dlm kitab Muwataha karangan Imam Malik, hidup lebih awal pd abad pertama hijrah sempat bertemu sahabat nabi yg menulis hadis Ikrimah, Anas bin Malik sbgnya...jd hadis diambil dr imam2 awal ini adalah shahih, cuma jika Ada percanggahan mgkin palsu dan xkuat, maka kita anggap ianya maslahah penulisan, cari yg lebih utama hadisnya yg bertepatan Al-Quran.

[@nurrulmamat8034]

Hujjah skadar menegakkan benang y basah? Ulama dahulu dh define kedudukan hadis. Tuan xmahu belajar. Kita ada hadis sahih, hassan, maudu, dhaif.. Itu kedudukan hadis. Mantam hadis jugak dkaji. Tuan dgn tuan kassim hidup xselama al quran. Klu tuan emragui hadis. Tuan meragui al quran. Kerana kedudukan al quran dan hadis ini sama tarafnya. Benda y dh lama dkaji dikuatkan. Dtg kita y umur setahun jagung pertikai.

[@ProfanzMotion]

nurulachal mamat puan saya bukan meragui hadis, saya belajar AlQuran Dan Hadis, guru saya jga ulama hadis Ph.D Madinah Dr. bidang hadis, sya jga mempunyai collection Shahih Bukhari di rumah, jga kitab hadis Dhaif & Maudhu. Sya jga biasa berckp dgn anti hadis, mrk xnk ambil tahu psal hadis, lagi la plak jenis2 hadis bgnya bukan dalil, jd saya lebih tekankan Al Quran disini supaya saudara kita lebih faham Beriman dgn Rasul sbhgn dr Iman.

[@RonMala]

Clear understanding.. 👍

[@9127yt]

kitab-allah itu quran , dgn kitab sebelumnya,,,,,,

[@suncai1]

apakah hadis yang disampaikan kepada kita hari ini adalah dari lidah Nabi ????

[@asyarinazar635]

Ia sahih dari lidah Nabi saw,Antara kitab2 yg mengumpulkan hadis sahih ialah Kitab sahih bukhari dan Muslim.Ulama zaman2 brzaman brusha mngumpulkn hadis sahih supya smpai kpda kita,Jika xsmpai maka smpai skrng xde sorangpun yg tau cara solat fardhu,ttapi hadis sahih smpai kpda kita dgn itu kita brjaya dpt thu cara solat fardhu melalui hadis Nabi saw.smntratu wujud juga hadis2 palsu yg dcipta oleh pihak yg xbrtanggungjwab.Maka ulama2 brsuha mngumpulakn kitab2 hadis plsu untuk mmbrithu kpda msyrakat islam bhawa hadistu palsu.jd kita blh kenal antra hadis sahih dn hadis palsu

[@sohadis55]

Sudah bnyak tahun polimik ini, halayak tak tahu apa pun hadis mana yg jdi kontroversi. Apa yg jdi riuh rendah nya

[@shahacong8895]

Ust salman ali mmng paduuuu......

[@kalalah007]

Nabi dan para sahabat sekali khatamkan al quran bergegar satu dunia dengan kebangkitan islam.. Yang kita ni berpuluh kali khatam al quran pon tak mampu nak gegarkan minda / akal fikiran kita.. bezanya dimana?

[@OrchidScent]

Nabi khatam? Surah2 dikumpul menjadi kitab yang diberi nama Quran hanya selepas kewafatan nabi.

[@look_man0801]

kalalah007 Kassim ahmad juga mahu kita nusantara ini khatam quran mengikut khatam nabi n sahabat... Bukan khatam para ustaz2... Beza tu.. Hehe

[@Persempadanansemula2876]

1) Hal2 berkaitan dunia senang2 shj manusia dapat menerima e.g dalam sesuatu akta, ia mempunyai seksyen, disokong oleh regulation, tak cukup dengan itu, code of practice (COD). Allah swt turunkan al quran sebagai teras yg mngandungi 3 panduan ;tauhid, sirah & syariah. Di terangkan lg oleh rasul saw. Kalau semua nak diterangkan dalam Al quran, berapa tebal Al quran akan kelihatan dan berapa ramai akan membacanya, mentelaahnya... 2) belajar biar berguru, jgn melalui pembacaan shj, syaitan tidak pernah tidur utk mnyesatkan manusia. Siapa guru untuk mendalami agama bagi kasim & tun mahathir... 3) kita tidak pernah tahu berapa byk pahala dam dosa kita shgga ditimbang di atas neraca, sekiranya sama banyak atau terkurang sedikit pahala, baru ko tahu apa itu syafaat rasul saw!! Rasul mana nk kenal & bantu ko kalau sunnah2nya ko tentang, tak nak ikut...selesai lah ko dlm neraka.. wanauzubillah..

[@mahariism]

Suriamarsuli. U only need to counter the arguments posed by Mr kassim Ahmad writings HADITH A REEVALUATION. nobody guides to the truth but Allah. All praise b to Allah.

[@darimiwamubarak]

Typical of you, always insists on having the last word, through deception I might add. I've presented books to counter your measly article. Answer the question. Prove to me the Quran that we have today is the same as the Quran that the Prophet Muhammad preached 1400 years ago. Simple question. Yet a great meaning is intended on how you answer it

[@darimiwamubarak]

Btw a new assignment for you. Read "Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature", by Muhammad Mustafa Azami. It's a very good book which thoroughly refuted all of the flimsy arguments brought by Ignaz Goldziher and also his ignorant parrot, Kassim Ahmad. Take the courage to at least read the book. And don't try to lie to me that Kassim Ahmad had refuted his points, because as far as I can tell, Kassim Ahmad arguments were not as even as half as deep as the arguments presented by Muhammad Mustafa Azami.

[@rhudinoalshafee5461]

suriamarsuli QURAN:THE ONLY LEGITIMATE "HADITH""These are GOD"s verses;we recite them for you truthfully.In which :Hadith",beside GOD and HIS verses ,do they believe in?WOE TO EVERY SINFUL FABRICATOR.He hears GOD's verses,then insists arrogantly on his way,as if he never heard them;promise him painful retribution.When he learns anything from our verses,he takes it in vain;these have deserved humiliating retribution.Awaiting them is hell;neither their earnings,nor the idols they had set up beside GOD can help them;they have deserved terrible retribution.THIS IS THE GUIDANCE,and those who do not believe the verses of their Lord will suffer debasement,and painful retribution."(Q45:6-11)Do you believe GOD's verses?Do you believe that QURAN is complete ,perfect,and fully detailed(Q6:19,38,&114)?Or do you have OTHER SOURCES BESIDE QURAN??QURAN is the ONLY "HADITH" TO BE FOLLOWED; all OTHER HADITHS ARE BLASPHEMOUS AND MISLEADING FABRICATIONS:Q39:23"GOD has revealed the best 'HADITH" ; a book that is consistent,and describes both ways (to heaven and hell)The skins of those who reverence their Lord shudder therefrom,then their skins and hearts soften up and receive GOD's message.Such is GOD's guidance;He guides whomever HE wills .As for those sent astray by HIM,NO ONE CAN GUIDE them.""There are those who advocate vain "Hadith" causing DIVERSION FROM THE PATH OF GOD,WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE ,AND FAIL TO TAKE SUCH ACTIONS SERIOUSLY;these have deserved HUMILIATING RETRIBUTION.And when our verses ARE RECITED to him,he turns away arrogantly, as if he never heard them;as if his ears are deaf;promise him painful retribution."(Q31:6-7)

[@rmohd699]

Tidak ada sesiapa yang boleh membuat keputusan jatuh-hukum dengan memutuskan , 'seseorang itu telah sesat / lari akidah nya atau TELAH MURTAD', kecuali hakim mahkamah syariah yang 'TAAT PADA SEMUA HUKUM DAN UNDANG-UNDANG YANG DITURUNKAN ALLAH (*orangnya juga mestilah berani menegakkan kembali UNDANG-UNDANG ALLAH yang telah dimansuhkan oleh manusia dan tidak lagi diguna-pakai. Ada berani ?! ). Kumpulan penyondol yang menyerang secara berkumpulan dan dengan muka garang membuli pak Kasim Ahmad adalah 'Penyondol yang nyata'. Dahi sebagian dari mereka yang hitam adalah jelas kesan dari TERKENA TAMPARAN SYAITAN. Kumpulan penyondol itu adalah golongan sesat dan pembisik yang nyata , berlagak sebagai hakim. Yaitu tidak ada sesiapa yang boleh memutuskan seseorang itu telah sesat , sama-ada dia berjawatan imam besar ( *pemimpin besar ), ulama besar ( *pakar terulung), maulana (*buah kana), ustazs ( *guru-guru agama), profesor ( *Dr / ber PHD), JAKIM, mufti atau ketua agama (*king/raja/sultan), kecuali yang layak menjatuhkan hukum adalah hakim mahkamah syariah yang sebenar dan berani menegakkan semua undang-undang Allah.

[@alihusin7158]

Kita kena nampak semua dari Allahtaala..tak satu pun tersilap..baik buruk nya datang dari Allah... Allah berfirman " Akulah yang mengilhamkan kepasikan dan Aku lah yang mengilhamkan ketakwaan..semua yg berlaku itu adalah kehendak Nya...bila kita faham ini insyaallah...semua nya akan beres...sbb yg berlaku itu adalah datang dari kitab indukNya...loh mahfuz...faham loh mahfuz dahulu.. insyaallah akan datang kebenarannya..

[@kitasehobi42]

tahu dgn kenal lain

[@cipfazizal8943]

Jgn hairan sahabat, akhir zaman org yg xtau agama dia sembang bab agama ikut fikiran sendiri walhal dia bkn ahli dalm hal agama...dia rasa dia sudah ckup pandai...dgn belajar melalui bacaan semata tanpa guru...

[@faizuljojoe1890]

Tuan sila fahami apa itu..bismillah Ar-Rahman Ar-Rahim.

[@look_man0801]

faizul jojoe Boleh tolong terangkan?

[@danialm8122]

Dah dah dah.. orang2 melayu semue..yang islam terutamanya.. tak nak pakai sunnah rasulullah sudah... Siapa nak amalkan tidak rugi..

[@AMA-k7w]

Ust.. saya dan banyak setuju wajib percaya pada Sunnah jika boleh disahkan benar drp Nabi sendiri .. jadi integrity lidah Nabi tak menjadi persoalan langsung.. tapi sebab hadis yg ditulis dan dikumpul oleh manusia lain tak boleh disahkan semuanya sahih samada drp kutipan Imam Bukhari dan Muslim sekalipun.. itu yg masalah besar .. jadi fahaman orang macam saya anggap tak mungkin hadis equal 100% dgn Sunnah -walhal khilafan nya terlalu banyak utk diterima tanggapan hadis itu Sunnah dan Sunnah itu hadis. Jadi camna nak beriman dgn hadis.. setakat percaya ok lah.. lagi pun hadis tiada dlm Rukun Iman dan juga dlm Al Baqarah 136 yg sebut semua rukun tanpa hadis.. itu lah antara dalil2 yg bezakan antara keduanya. Sampai skrg tak ada siapa yg boleh mengaitkan sah dan benarnya Sunnah telah semuanya dikumpulkan dlm hadis2.. jadi tak baik dan berdosa nak accuse atau label orang anti hadis dgn sewenangwenannya.. ibadat2 khusus yg kita buat adalah diingati , diperlihatkan, diajar dipraktikan dan dida’wah ikut turun temurun drp Nabi, sahabat2, tabiin dan seterusnya sampai kita..jadi tanpa hadis2 pun orang2 dahulu, skrg dan sampai kiamat pun akan mengikuti drp generasi2nya .. kalau nak kata perlu hadis utk ajar cara bersolat umpamanya, hadis2 tidak dpt sebut dan copy 100% drp Nabi dgn hanya tulisan2 saja..yg 100% sah dan betul hanya kalau ada video/audio drp khalifah Ar Rashidun.. since dah mustahil, cukup sekadar apa yg kita semua ikuti drp generasi2 ke generasi sahaja.. maaf bukan bergurau tapi benar.. fikir baik2 sebab saya memang ikut Ust dan Salafis dlm banyak perkara khususnya bersabit dgn ibadat2..TK

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ!BUKANKAH WUJUD FIRMAN ALLAH DIMANA NABI MUHAMMAD LARANG MEMARTABATKAN HADIS SELAIN AL QURAN ITU SEBAGAI RUJUKAN SUMBER HUKUM??Q6:114;45:6-7;17:45-46!!69:43-48?? HAKIKATNYA ALLAH DAN NABI MUHAMMAD ITU ANTI HADIS! DR.KASSIM AHMAD BENAR MEMARTABATKAN TAUHID TIANG AGAMA DAN AL QURAN SAHAJA RUJUKAN SUMBER HUKUM!!!

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH NUSANTARA !!BENARKAH ULAMAK2 MAZHAB TIDAK IKUT HADIS SAHIH DAN AL QURAN??? AL FATEHAH!~THE BOOKS OF HADITH REPORTED THE PROPHET’S ORDERS TO WRITE DOWN NOTHING FROM HIM EXCEPT THE QURAN!(Q69:44-47)TWO SUCH HADITHS TAKEN FROM HADITHISTS MOST RELIABLE SOURCES SAHIH MUSLIM AND IS-HAAH AHMAD IBN HANBAL” THE PROPHET SAID ,”DO NOT WRITE DOWN ANYTHING FROM ME EXCEPT THE QURAN”[AHMED,VOL.1,PAGE 171,AND SAHIH MUSLIM] .Another HADITH states that THE PROPHET MAINTAINED HIS ANTI HADITH STAND UNTIL DEATH [AHMED ,vol 1,page 192].SAHABAT NABI~ OMAR BERKATA:”QURAN MENCUKUPI UNTUK KITA,USAH DITULIS APA-APA DARI NABI “[Bukhari,Jihad 176,Cizya 6,Ilim49,Marza 17,Megazi83,Iusam26,Muslim,Vasiyya 20,21,22]* Surah Al-Ankaboot 29:52[Say."Allah suffices as a witness between Me and you.He knows everything in the heavens and the earth.Surely,those who believe in falsehood and disbelieve in ALLAH are the real losers.] note again ALLAH SUFFICES AS A WITNESS BETWEEN ME AND YOU.Q4:79. IS THE SECOND SYAHADAH.IN AZAN AND SALAT..” the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God, or more literally the establishment of “partners” placed beside God. It is the vice that is opposed to the virtue of tawhid (monotheism) ”IN CRYSTAL CLEAR DEFIANCE OF ALLAH’S COMMANDMENT IN Q 72:18 REMEMBER ALLAH’S COMMANDMENT IN Q72:18] THE PLACES OF WORSHIP BELONG TO ALLAH DO NOT CALL (INVOKE) ON ANYONE ELSE BESIDE ALLAH. ANYONE ELSE INCLUDES PROPHET MUHAMMAD ,PROPHET ABRAHAM ANY SECT LEADERS DEAD OR ALIVE ARE IDOLS AND THEREFORE “SHIRK”.MAZHAB FOLLOWERS WHO uphold the idolatry second syahadah not found in the HOLY QURAN are not MUSLIMS(Q63:1-3)Prophet Muhammad DISOWN ALL MAZHAB in verse Q30:30:35 !GOD DID NOT AUTHORISED THEIR DECLARATION OF FAITH!Please refrain from calling ALL THOSE MAZHAB followers as MUSLIM because in reality they are MUNAFEQOON!ONLY MONOTHEIST WHO UPHOLDS THE SYAHADAH OF THE AL QURAN OF Q3:18 CAN CLAIM THEMSELSVES MUSLIMS IN Q3:19!MAZHAB FOLLOWERS ESPECIALLY THEIR SCHOLARS FAIL TO ACKNOWLEGE THAT THEY ARE NOT MUSLIMS AS THEY HAVE ABANDON THE QURAN IN FAVOUR OF NON DIVINE HADITHS AND BANDED TOGETHER TO DEFEND THEIR SCHOOL OF THOUGHT (THAT LEGITIMIZES AND UPHOLD THE SECOND SYAHADAH IN CONTACT PRAYERS) NOT AUTHORISED BY GOD ( Q42:21;63:1-3;4:79;69:44-47) AS THEY UPHOLD THE BUKHARI'S HADITH AND ENDORSED BY IMAM SYAFIE AND THEIR RESPECTIVE IMAMS WHICH THROUGH DIVERSE OPINIONS RESULTED IN THE PROBLEMS OF SECTARIAN VIOLENCE WE HAVE TODAY! TO SOLVE ALL THESE PROBLEMS MAZHAB SCHOLARS MUST RETURN TO ISLAM AND UPHOLD THE ONLY HOLY QURAN (QURANUN WAHDAHU~17:46)!THERE EXISTS A FAILURE TO FOLLOW THE TRUE TEACHINGS OF THE QURAN?INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING THE QURAN THEY HAVE MADE THE HADITHS SUPREME AND ADULTERATED THE TRUE TEACHINGS OF THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD.THE MUSLIM WORLD WILL PROGRESS BY ADOPTING ALLAH ALONE AND QURAN ALONE !Prophet Muhammad Hadith are Not the Prophet Hadith;Instead they are Hadiths (narrations) of men and women who NEVER SAW THE PROPHET, in fact the GRAND PARENTS of their GRAND PARENTS NEVER SAW THE PROPHET. The first book of Hadith was that of Bukhari BORN 200 YEARS AFTER THE DEATH OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD. Thus the Hadith is simply a narration by Bukhari’s sources, claiming that ,he or she HEARD SOMETHING about the Prophet ACROSS 8 GENERATIONS OF THE DEAD.It is left to your imagination on the narration’s Accuracy and Originality. Well your assessment is about the same as any RATIONAL HUMAN.If there exist confusion today amongst the UMMAH THE CAUSES ARE WELL KNOWN !~{Instead of Following the Revelations of Allah, they follow what is Conjectured to be The Prophet’s utterances.Thus they DISOBEY ALLAH and The PROPHET by following the ‘Hadith’ GUESS WORK.(The findings in Quran6:112 and Q25;31 represents flagrant Disobedience of Allah and His Final Prophet).} QUESTION! .DOES ALLAH ENDORSES OTHER THAN THE QURAN AS A LEGITIMATE SOURCE OF GUIDANCE~SO QUOTING TARMIZI,ABU HURAIRAH, MUSLIM , BUKHARI’S OR ANYONE ELSE’S HADITHS AND ATTRIBUTE IT TO THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD PBUH IS THEREFORE AN ACT OF DISOBEDIENCE TO ALLAH !??(IS IT NOT ILLEGAL TOO??)???OLEH ITU PIHAK2 YANG BERWAJIB HARUSLAH TIDAK TERAGAK AGAK UNTUK MENGAMBIL TINDAKAN UNDANG UNDANG KE ATAS MANA MANA PIHAK(APA JUA) YANG MENYALAH GUNA HADITHS KERANA IANYA BOLEH MENYESATKAN UMMAH!!?? SurahAl-An’am 6:112[We have permitted the enemies of every prophet-human and jin devils= to inspire in each fancy words ,in order to deceive. Had your Lord willed,they would not have done it. You shall disregard them and their fabrications] OBEY ALLAH,OBEY RASUL* The phrase-”obey messenger” does not give blanket approval to obey everything the Messenger uttered.The choice of words in the QURAN IS PERFECT..ALLAH did not say “Obey Muhammad” nor did HE say “Obey Nabi”.Instead HE said “obey rasul”.The Arabic word “rasul” is a term derived from a root (Arabic-risalah) meaning”a message”.From the root word as well as the meaning of “rasul”means obey the messenger who is bringing a message from ALLAH.So obey the message that the messenger brings.This was his ONLY duty that ALLAH has spelled that out clearly in the QURAN:Q3:144 Muhammad is no more than a messenger.Q3:20Thy duty is to convey the message.Q16:82Thy duty is ONLY to preach the Clear Message.The SAME THEME IS REPEATED IN Q16:35;24:54;29:18;42:48;64:12 and MORE. Therefore the FUNDAMENTAL THEME OF “Obey ALLAH,obey rasul”,-when the prophet pbuh uttered QURANIC verses that contain injunctions,rules,guidance for the correct establishment of the DEEN demands and commands obedience from the believers. THE AUTHORITY IS FROM ALLAH THROUGH THE QURAN,THUS OBEY ALLAH IS OBEY THE QURAN AND OBEY MESSENGER IS OBEY THE QURAN*.”?AL FATEHAH!

[@rafaeldwelldossantos797]

Tak ada pun dalam ayat2 tu.. mana ayat yang melarang memartabatkan hadis dari Allah dan Nabi Muhammad?

[@halifzent2686]

@@rafaeldwelldossantos797 dia tu x ngaji punya orang, x yah layan lah

[@mahariism]

Al Quran itu wahyu karena ciri2 nya yg tak ada yg palsu, lemah, kuat dan sahih. Beza dengan hadis ia tidak begitu.. Jelas hadis itu tak mungkin jadi wahyu. Perbezaan yg begitu ketara ,masih tidak jelas ditanggap apa yg boleh kita katakan?

[@Tepid_Evos]

Surah Ibrahim ayat 4 ~ "Allah yang menyesatkan & memberi jalan petunjuk". Sooooo kenapa yg kita sibuk2 lagi nak tentukan sapa betul sapa salah..... Itu Qada' & Qadar manusia (Rukun Iman ke 6). Jadi ambil pendekatan lihat dan diam dah la dalam melihat Jamal & Jalal Allah ini.

[@fiquexii4970]

Kalimah yg haq tp di letakkan d tempat yg bathil

[@halifzent2686]

idiot go away please

[@abdulmustapha2942]

Kemas ustd ni mantap.

[@udeenzanedine5477]

ada yg kembali dpangkal jalan Aminnn

[@zulkurnainazlin8069]

Aku tak setuju

[@JOSHUA-mq8pf]

baik wali atau pun ulama atau siapa saja selagi doanya masih tidak dapat mengamankan dunia maka itu bermakna kita adalah sama yg masih lagi mengharapkan TUNJUKKAN DAKU JALAN YG LURUS dari allah..jadi ada baiknya muasabah jiwa dan bersabar dgn kerenah berbagai pemikiran insan didunia ini dan terus perbaiki jiwa masing2..takut apabila terlalu sebukkan hadis sana dan sini lalu terlupa pulak nak bersyukur dgn nikmat nyawa dan jasad yg allah berikan..kerna yg akan pergi itu adalah jasad kita..dan hadis pula sampai kiamat pun tidak akan ada habisnya selagi masih ada keturunan QABIL didunia ini..

[@alihusin7158]

Ya betul... keutamaannya dulu adalah Qur'an.. barulah ya lainnya...nabi berpesan kembalilah kepada Qur'an dan sunnah..jika berpaling dari dua nya... sesatlah...

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM!BUKANKAH ULAMAK ULAMAK MAZHAB (AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH)BERFAHAMAN LIBERAL ?DISEBALIK TOPENG IMAN AGEN AGEN SYAITAN MENYELEWENG MANUSIA DARIPADA JALAN ALLAH !SUNGGUH JAHAT APA MEREKA LAKUKAN!!LIHAT JUGA (Q63:1-3)SOALAN KEPADA IKIM,PERSATUAN ULAMAK PONDOK ; ,USTAZ DAN USTAZAH ,PEGUAM SYARIE~ADAKAH AKIDAH ITU AJARAN NABI MUHAMMAD DAN DALAM SURAH APA DAN AYAT MANAKAH DIDALAM AL-QURAN ITU IANYA DISEBUT??The concept of AKIDAH:The language of the Quran is ARABIC,flawless and perfect;Because the Quran was revealed to an ARAB speaking prophet in Arabic,and is taught by the Gracious Surah Al -Rahman ~55:2[The Teacher of the Quran][55:1~(Tuhan) Yang Maha Pemurah serta melimpah-limpah rahmatNya;2Dialah yang mengajar Al-Quran],it is a message to all humanity regardless of their language.Allah has no shortage of Words.His language is excellently eloquent specially picked and preserved and mathematically protected*. He talks of EEMAN as guidance to Righteousness and Salvation for His human creature.Question~So why do ulamaks become Extra -Quranic?Every Justin might not be just;every Mr,Smart may not be smart. God and the prophet Never said anything about the concept of aqedah as "religious faith".The Quran only refers to faith or"IMAN"(Arabic :EEMAN)The idea as well as the word comes from the Hebrew Bible.Aqedah is also a Hebrew word ,"AQEDAH":The Hebrew word for 'binding' and the common designation for Genesis 22:1-19,Abraham "binds" Isaac(verse 9). The Oxford Companion to the Bible TALKS ABOUT "AQEDAH' ON PAGE 43. QUESTION TO ISLAMIC SCHOLARS(PERSATUAN ULAMAK PONDOK):IS AQEQAH THE TEACHINGS OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD IN THE AL-QURAN~WHICH SURAH AND VERSE IN THE QURAN AQEQAH IS MENTIONED?? The Sunni cult (Penganut Agama Mazhab) believes that when a child is born,the parents should make a sacrificial offering of an animal(usually lamb or goat) to God to celebrate and thank the birth of the child.This is called the AQEQAH(it most likely a HEBREW word that comes straight from the HEBREW BIBLE just like AQEDAH) .THIS FALSE TEACHINGS CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE QL-QURAN.IT COMES FROM THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE. fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xat1/v/t1.0-9/12961552_222761038087617_4485114949433440340_n.jpg?oh=761d90ae37d598287ca2ff5aa631d276&oe=57B55669&__gda__=1467351990_5cf92df22eb8230f9c275f9867b77441 [Leveticus12:5]"And when the days of her purifying are completed,whether for a son or for a daughter,she shall bring to the priest at the door of the tent of meeting a lamb a year old for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon or a turtledove for sin offering,[Lev12:7] and he shall offer it before the LORD ,and make atonement for her;then she shall be clean from the flow of blood.This is the law for her who bears a child ,either male or female.[Lev12:8]And if she cannot afford a lamb,then she shall take two turtledoves or two young pigeons,one for burnt offering and the other for sin offering; and the priest shall make atonement for her,and she shall be clean."THESE ARE STRANGE BIBLICAL TEACHINGS AND CANNOT BE FOUND IN THE QURAN.THESE SIMILAR TEACHINGS IN BIBLICAL SUNNISM EXIST IN THE SO CALLED HADITH AND SUNNAH.. The Sunnis have also modified the Biblical teaching and for a male child you shall sacrifice two lambs and one lamb for female .However if one cannot sacrifice a lamb ,other animals like fowl and pigeons may be sacrificed.Sacrificial offerings are also link with the childs ability to provide intercession capabilities(SYAFAAT) for the parents in hereafter.This is Biblical Sunnism -otherwise known as AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JAMAAH .THIS RELIGION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD'S TEACHINGS WHICH IS NONE OTHER THAN THE AL-QURAN.ALLAH AND THE PROPHET MUHAMMAD HAVE ALREADY WARNED THE MUSLIMS [AL-IMRAN 3:100]~"O ye who believe!If ye obey a party of the people of the Book,they WILL MAKE YOU DISBELIEVERS AFTER YOUR BELIEF."This is exactly what has happened today ,AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JAMAAH has reverted back to obeying the BIBLE~BIBLICAL SUNNIS~THE BEST CHRISTIANS!!! ISU RAMBUT??!!!~PETIKAN daripada buku BIBLICAL SUNNISM ~A Study Of Biblical Influences On Ahlul Sunnah Wal Jamaah menunjukkan perkara berikut” Many things have been added to ISLAM and what is considered as part of ISLAM is actually not found in the Muslim Holy Book , the QURAN. BIBLICAL SUNNISM~The so called"Stoning to Death"upon Conviction of Adultery (Hudud Laws)(Deut 22:22,24)"If there is a betrothed virgin, and a man meets her in the the City and lies with her, then you shall bring them both to the gate of the City,and you shall Stone Them to Death with Stones......"Kill them, Kill.Kill,Kill~This is Biblical Sunnism.It all comes Hot from the Bible.What does the QURAN say ? See AnNur 24:2[ The adulteress and the adulterer you shall WHIP each of them a Hundred Lashes.Do not be swayed by pity from carrying out Allah's law,if you truly believe in Allah and the Last Day. And let a group of believers witness their penalty.]Please Believe in Allah's Quran Alone~(Quranun Wahdahu)... Question! Since the Quran Superceeds other Scriptures why are Muftis , Islamic Scholars and Taliban Leaders insist in following the Bible??? Another hot topic ,a favorite of ASWJ Ulama about women covering the heads can be found in the Bible,1st Corinthians, chapter 11 Revised Standard Version[1Cor11:5][1Cor11:6][1Cor11:10] for example[1Cor 11:13]~[Judge for yourselves;is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered].So the commandment for a woman to cover her head is in the Bible.The Christians themselves today are not following the Bible-their women do not cover the head.But it is the mazhab followers who are very good Christians because they make sure that their women cover their heads.The DRESS CODE FOR WOMEN in the QURAN 33:59~[O prophet,tell your wives,your daughters,and the wives of the believers that they shall lengthen their garments.Thus,they will be RECOGNIZED(as righteous women) and avoid being insulted.GOD is Forgiver,Most Merciful.].ISU MURTAD~Hukuman Murtad diambil daripada kitab Taurat dan bercanggah dengan ajaran Al-Quran.Harus dibuktikan bahawa Hukuman ini mungkin satu pindaan yang telah dibuat oleh orang Yahudi terhadap kitab mereka dan hukuman ini nyata jika ada telah dimansukhkan dalam Quran.Soalan adakah Nabi Muhammad mengajar dalam bahasa Hebrew?Bukankah kitab yang harus diterima pakai adalah Al-Quran .Adakah PENGIKUT MAZHAB IKUT AGAMA YAHUDI???ALLAH MEMBERI KEBEBASAN MUTLAK KEPADA MANUSIA SAMA ADA HENDAK BERIMAN ATAU KAFIR KEPADA -NYA.SEORANG MANUSIA BERHAK UNTUK MEMILIH YANG HENDAK DIANUTINYA ATAU KELUAR DARI AGAMA ITU..ADALAH BENAR ISLAM AGAMA YANG DIREDA OLEH ALLAH.ALLAH TIDAK MENERIMA AGAMA SELAIN ISLAM,TETAPI ALLAH TIDAK MEMAKSA SESEORANG MANUSIA SUPAYA MEMILIH ISLAM ,JIKA ITU BUKAN KEHENDAKNYA.SOALAN POKOK SEKARANG ADAKAH PENGANUT AGAMA MAZHAB ASWJ DAN SYIAH DENGAN KAEDAH PERIBADATAN YANG BERTENTANGAN DENGAN AL-QURAN ITU ISLAM???MOHON ULASAN PEGUAM SYARIE DAN PERSATUAN ULAMAK PONDOK DAN RADIO IKIM JAWAB DALAM MEDIA ARUS PERDANA SUPAYA SEMUA ORANG FAHAM !(TANPA PRASANGKA ATAU DITUTUP OLEH MANA MANA PIHAK YANG BERKEPENTINGAN!) Surah Al-Baqarah~2:256[There shall be no compulsion in religion:the right way is now distinct from the wrong way. Anyone who denounces the devil and believes in GOD has grasped the strongest bond, one that never breaks.GOD is Hearer.Omniscient.] Like · Reply · Jan 2, 2015 11:19am ·worldtruth.tv/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/historic-first-muslim-prayers-vatican-pope-francis-revelation-17-false-prophet-one-world-religion.jpg

[@mahariism]

Profantz motion. Sila baca tulisan SDR kassim ahmad yg disebutkan. Jawaban nya ada disana.

[@SULUKEN]

Hadis palsu!!! . hadisnya begini.. Sebaik-baik Hadis dan petunjuk ialah Kitabullah... sebaik-baik praktikal ialah praktikal (Sunnah ) Rasulullah... itu yang betul..... dan tiada siapa yang pertikaikan Nabi Muhammad... Apa yang Muhammad kata itu dari wahyu ALLAh... apa yang ALLAH kata itulah yang Muhammad kata... itu tiada masalah... yang bermasalahnya aialah hadis2 yang muncul bagai cendawan tumbuh selepas hujan di zaman Imam Syafie... sehingga muncul pelbagai jenis hadis... ada yang palsu, ada yang dhoif, dll... itu menunjukan berlakuknya tokok tambah ke atas hadis nabi.. oleh itu untuk mennetukan hadis yang betul dan selari dgn Qur'an... maka wajiblah Qur'an menyaring semua hadis2 ini.. ini yang betul... barulah kita dapat maksud bahawa apa yang dikata oleh nabi itu adalah wahyu ALLAH.. wahyu ALLAH cuma ada satu... apa yang termuat dalam Qur'an.... itu sahaja..! maka ikutlah Qur'an... danb amiklah hadis yang selari dgn Qur'an.. yang tak selari dgn Qur'an itu kompomlah tak betul!... dalam Qur'an ALLAH tak suruh ikut Sunnah... tetapi suruh ikut Rasul.. kerana perkataan Rasul itu adalah perkataan Qur'an.. iaitu wahyu ALLAH... sebab itu ada perintah supaya ikut Rasul.. ALLAH tak sebut pun sunnah... jadi Ustaz.. tolong jangan memandai2 nak tafsir ayat ALLAH...anda akan nampak akhlak Rasul melaui Qur'an... dah lupa ke hadis Aisyah.." Aklah nabi ialah Qur'an." ???? tu ustaz dah lupa la tu! kekkekee

[@khalidalwalid3146]

+Silzack Khairol Kau kata, Quran tak suruh ikut Sunnah, tapi suruh ikut Rasul, kerana perkataan Rasul itu adalah perkataan Al Quran iaitu wahyu Allah. Itu kau cakap. Ustaz tu cakap Sunnah itu perbuatan dan perkataan yg di ucap oleh Rasul. Iaitu Sunnah itu Rasul dan rasul itu Sunnah. Jadi betullah apa yg Ustaz ni cakap. kau tu yang belit2 bro. Lepas tu kau gelak kekekeke..mcm hampeh. Kau ingat kau tu pandai sangat ke? Meh la jumpa aku biar aku yg ajar kau.

[@SULUKEN]

Ustaz Cakap... Bukan Qur'an cakap... ko ni.. baca betul ayat Qur'an... jangan menambah2.. takde perkataan sunnah nabi dalam Qur'an... ko ngan Ustaz ko tu sama je bangang!...:)

[@khalidalwalid3146]

Silzack Khairol Apa sahaja yg Rasul cakap atau perbuatan nya, ia adalah sunnah. kau faham tak bangang?? Allah turunkan Al Quran melalui malaikat Jibril terus klepada Nabi Muhammad. Maknaya Al Quran juga datang dari mulut Nabi Muhammad. Hadis juga datang dari mulut Muhammad. Maknanya apa? Maknanya Al Quran dan sunnah itu ada pertalian di mana dia datang dari orang yang sama. Kalau kau percaya Quran, kenapa kau tak percaya Hadis sbb dia datang dari orang yg sama?? Kau lagi bangang !!!

[@SULUKEN]

siapakah kata Sunnah? ada dalam Qur'an kata Sunnah ke ?

[@khalidalwalid3146]

Silzack Khairol Kau ni bangang. tak faham faham !!! Sunnah ialah sesuatu yg di sebut atau dlm bentuk perbuatan Nabi. Allah SWT memilih Nabi Muhammad sebagai penyampai wahyunya atau utusannya kpd seluruh umat manusia. Kau sapa nak pertikaikan Sunnah Rasul??? Otak kau tu yg berjambul tak reti2...

[@pakyeh9]

Melim Pro Hadis adalah Muslim Anti Quran. Buktinya 1) Allah /Quran kata" "Tiada paksaan dalam deen" Q2:256. Tapi Muslim hadis kata "Ada paksaan dalam deen /Bonoh pemurtad". Maka Muslim hadith thelah TONGSAMPAHkan Q2:256 dan angkat perawi hadis / Bukhari,Muslim dlln Ulama Hadis sebagai Tuhan mereka. Akibat haadis dan Ulama hadis "bunoh pemurtad" itu Muslim Suni dan Shaiah berbunoh sesama sendiri.

[@baitikalam810]

yg sebenarnya dunia akhir zaman.

[@mikemono2876]

anti hadis tu kapiak ka? hadis sahih dan hasis daif tu mcm mana?

[@kandansaikon3556]

Quran mengandungi kata kata Nabi yang Di hujahkan olih Nabi sendiri. Hadis adalah kata kata Nabi yang disampaikan olih orange lain.

[@benbakar701]

Crita tolak hdis umum.bnyak logik lain org bawa.

[@sayangsayang3992]

tanya sikit adakah semua arahan2 tuhan dlm alquran itu semuanya berstatus wajib? tidak kann, ada yg wajib ada yg sunat dan ada ditahap anjuran. tuhan suruh manusia menjalankan arahan2 nya mengikut kemampuan hamba2 nya. jgnlah nak terlalu2 berkobar2 melebihi dari tuhan dan rasulnya.

[@rafaeldwelldossantos797]

Solat dan zakat tu wajib.. contoh yg sunat?

[@sayangsayang3992]

@@rafaeldwelldossantos797 kamu wajib bayar zakat 2.5 peratus, ini sangat sedikit kan, tapi kamu telah terlepas dari dosa. Namun kamu disunatkan ,dianjurkan supaya memberi sedekah, infak, hadiah kepada sesama manusia terutama anakyatim dan fakir miskin. Amalan bersedekah kamu akan dicintai Allah.

[@mohdhafizidaud6092]

Zaman dlu2 islam berperang dgn kapir, zaman skrg islam berperang dgn islam, Masing2 nak betol, nak tjk hebat, nak kapir kan orang.. Ish2 nauzubillah

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

HAKIKATNYA DOKTRIN YANG DIBAWA OLEH MAZHAB YANG MARTABAT SYAHADAH KEDUA YANG TIDAK ADA DALAM AL QURAN SEBAGAI SYARIAT ALLAH ITU MENYESATKAN UMMAH! ASWJ TOLAK TAUHID SEBAGAI TIANG AGAMA WAL HAL KESELURUHAN AJARAN DALAM AL QURAN ITU AJARAN BAGAIMANA ELAK SYIRIK DAN BERTAUHID PADA ALLAH! ADAKAH NABI MUHAMMAD AJAR AQIDAH HEBREW? KESELURUHAN DOKTRIN MAZHAB IALAH MELAWAN FIRMAN ALLAH DALAM Q72:18DAN MEMPERSEKUTUKAN ALLAH(Q12:103;12:106)! MELALUI DOKTRIN IDOLAAN NABI MUHAMMAD MELALUI SYAHADAH KEDUA ,SELAWAT DAN SYAFAAT ULAMAK2 MAZHAB MENGGAGALKAN UMMAH MENCAPAI TAQWA DIDALAM IBADAT ! PAK KASSIM BENAR APABILA MENDAKWA MAZHAB MEMBAWA DOKTRIN YANG SALAH BAGI ORANG2 MELAYU DI MALAYSIA! NABI MUHAMMAD TIDAK DIBENARKAN MENYAMPAI AJRAN SELAIN DARI APA YANG ADA DALAM AL QURAN ITU!Q69:43-48! KAEDAH PERIBADATAN YANG DIBAWA OLEH NABI ABRAHAM SEPERTI SOLAT ZAKAT PUASA DAN HAJI SUDAH WUJUD SEMASA NABI MUHAMMAD WUJUD DAN BAGINDA DIANJURKAN SUPAYA IKUT AGAMA YANG DI BAWA OLEH NABI ABRAHAM(16:123)! SOLAT2 SUNAT SEMUANYA CIPTAAN MAZHAB BELAKA! SURAH AL HAQQAH 43-48 ;DAN Q10;15 TUJUAN ASWJ TOLAK MILLAT ABRAHAM ADALAH UNTUK MENGELIRUKAN UMMAH SEOLAH2 NABI MUHAMMAD ITU BAWA ISLAM!

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH SELURUH NUSANTARA!AL- FATEHAH;SURAH AL-IKHLAS! MAKCHIK DAN PAKCHIK DI KAMPUNG2 NII DAN DAN ORANG 2 JAHIL DALAM FACEBOOK NAK TANYA JAKIM dan IKIM beserta ULAMAK2 dalam PAS ,PAN dan UMNO ! SESAT??SIAPA SEBENARNYA SESAT DAN WAJIB BERTAUBAT????????!!!!~Orang orang Melayu khususnya harus bertanya kepada para Ilmuan,Persatuan Ulamak Malaysia,IKIM ,JAKIM ,Persatuan Ulamak Pondok ,Persatuan Tahfiz kenapa wujudnya gerakan besar besaran oleh ulamak2 pegangan mazhab menjadikan SALAT SEBAGAI TIANG AGAMA DIDALAM CERAMAH2 DIMEDIA MASA PADA HAKIKATNYA TAUHID ITU ADALAH TIANG AGAMA ~PEGANGAN ASAS AGAMA ISLAM (Agama rasmi yang termaktub didalam Perlembagaan Malaysia).Dalampada itu pula extremis agama didalam Parti2 Politik cuba mencari pengaruh bertujuan menukar Agama Islam ~Agama didalam Perlembagaan itu kepada Agama Mazhab fahaman AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH yang tidak di redha oleh ALLAH. .[Refer Q15:90-99;Q30:30,31,32,35]Disebaliknya tanpa disedari perubahan sedemikian rupa mempunyai IMPLIKASI POLITIK YANG AMAT BESAR (jika agenda mereka berjaya) kepada orang2 Melayu.Bersandarkan Surah surah berikut (Q30:30-35)(39:45; 3:18; 37:35).(2:123,254; 6:70,94; 7:53; 10:3,18,49; 13:16; 39:44,45; 43:86; 74:48; 82:17-19).(18:110; 41:6; 47:19; 48:2; 33:37; 42:52; 93:7). didalam AL-QURAN ADALAH SUKAR BAGI ULAMAK MAZHAB MENERANGKAN KONSEP TAUHID BERPAKSIKAN KEPADA SYAHADAH KEDUA ASAS PEGANGAN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG PADA HAKIKATNYA TIDAK DIREDHAI DAN MENDAPAT KEBENARAN ALLAH!! Q30:35~[Have we given them authorization that justifies their idolatry?] Q4:116,118,119*.Kebanyakan manusia yang beriman tidak beriman kecuali MENYENGUTUKAN TUHAN.*Q12:106. MEMPERSEKUTUKAN ALLAH ADALAH DOSA BESAR YANG TIDAK BOLEH DI AMPUN OLEH ALLAH!! kassimahmad.blogspot.com/search?q=TIANG+AGAMA SOALAN YANG HARUS DITANYA OLEH ORANG ORANG MELAYU MASAKINI IALAH BENARKAH AGAMA ISLAM ITU SAMA DENGAN FAHAMAN AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH?? ..kassimahmad.blogspot.com/2014_09_01_archive.html? kassimahmad.blogspot.my/search?q=Ahli+Sunnah+Wal-Jama%E2%80%99ah+%28ASWJ%29 sites.google.com/site/reviversoftruth/some-so-called-hadiths-that-every-educated-muslim-on-this-planet-must-read

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

KALAU ALLAH PERINTAH DALAM BULAN RAMADAN BOLEH BERSETUBUH DI MALAM HARI BERMAKNA BAB IBADAT LAIN SEPERTI CARA BERSOLAT ZAKAT PUASA HAJI ITU SUDAH DIKETAHUI KETIKA ITU!CONTOH ZAMAN COLOR TV TAKKAN NAK AJAR CARA BERBASIKAL PULA! TAK PERLULAH UNGKIT BAB SOLAT ITU YANG DIBAWA OLEH KETURUNAN NABI IBRAHIM ITU! DOKTRIN TOLAK MILLAT IBRAHIM OLEH ASWJ IALAH NAK TUNJUK KATA NABI MUHAMMAD LAH YANG BAWA ISLAM DAN ISLAM BERMULA DENGAN NABI MUHAMMAD BUKAN NABI IBRAHIM!Q16:123!!! ADA NAMPAK BAGAIMANA DAJJAL MENYUSUP MASUK DALAM AGAMA ISLAM???!!

[@mamapapa1921]

lidah muhammad tada siapa yg pertikai...lidah yg nembawa hadis selain al quran tu ada jaminan integriti dak?

[@fiquexii4970]

Then bg tau laa kt aq tentang riwayat hidup muhammad apa yg dibuat apa tindakana bagaimana dia manifestasi al quran dlm hidup dia Sila gunakan al quran jgn gunakan mana2 riwayat

[@halifzent2686]

dah tu solat kamu camne eh? mana tau ada baca fatihah waktu qiyam, ke x baca? mana tau bacaan waktu rukuk, sujud, iktidal etc?

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH SELURUH NUSANTARA!! PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ANAK ANAK MASAKINI TELAH TERDEDAH KEPADA DOKTRIN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG BERSELINDUNG DENGAN NAMA ISLAM SEKIAN LAMA ! MASA TIBA AJARAN AGAMA ISLAM SEBENAR DIKEMBALIKAN KE INSTITUSI PENGAJIAN MASAKINI YANG DIKAWAL OLEH PENDIDIK 2 YANG MASIH ANGGAP SYAHADAH KEDUA ITU ADALAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM" DAN MEREKA INILAH PENGAMAL ISLAM LIBERAL! SOALAN KEPADA USTAZ2 DAN USTAZAH2 JAKIM ,IKIM ,ASWJ WAHABI, SALAFI,QADIANI,PAN,PAS UMNO! CABARAN TERBESAR ORANG2 MELAYU SERTA UMAT ISLAM DI MALAYSIA DIJURUSKAN KEARAH MENGEMBALIKAN ISLAM YANG DI AJAR OLEH ALLAH(Q55:1-2)MELALUI MALAIKATNYA KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD YANG TERDAPAT DIDALAM KITAB AL QURAN SERTA SYAHADAH TAUHIDNYA DALAM Q3:18;47:19 DAN ISLAM DALAM Q3:19 SERTA MENOLAK AJARAN IMAM2 MAZHAB YANG MEMBAWA AGAMA MAZHAB WAHABI ;ASWJ; SYIAH ;SALAFIS DLL BERSAMA DOKTRIN DUA SUMBER HUKUM YANG DILARANG ALLAH DALAM 6:114;45:6-7. AFTER MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH OF THE QURAN. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PROVED THAT THE QURAN IS INDEED THE INFALLIBLE WORD OF GOD. HIS CONTINUED RESEARCH UNVIELED A STARTLING FACT.THE EXTREME POPULAR"HADITH AND SUNNA" HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND THE ADHERENCE THERETO REPRESENTS FLAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF GOD AND HIS FINAL PROPHET.(QURAN 6:112& 25:31).TELLING THE MAZHAB FOLLOWERS THAT "HADITH AND SUNNA"ARE SATANIC INVENTIONS IS THE SAME AS TELLING THE CHRISTIANS THAT JESUS IS NOT THE SON OF GOD !! Unfortunately IMAM SYAFIEE was UNABLE TO ANALYSE COMPREHENSIVELY AS DR.RASHAD KHALIFA WITHOUT THE COMPUTER IN THE MODERN AGE.ASWJ WAHABI AND SYIA FACTIONS TRY TO PROMOTE THEIR IDOLS WITHOUT SUCCESS(Q30:30-35).IMAM SYAFIEE AND IMAM BUKHARI FAIL TO ESTABLISH THAT THE ILLEGAL AND ANTI QURANIC CONCOCTION OF SECOND DECLARATION OF FAITH(Q30:35 which led astray the mazhab followers) AND SUPPORT OF IMAM BUKHARI SECOND SOURCE OF RELIGIOUS GUIDANCE(4:116;6:114) IS CONSIDERED IDOLATRY(SYIRIK;SHIRK)BY ALLAH~Q6:114;42:21;39:45;40:12;47:19!! Q63:1-3;72:18-20;18:110 [RAMAI UMMAH TERPESONG Q30:30-35) TANPA SEDAR MASAKINI!!!! THEY ARE INDEED THE IDOLATERS!! ACCORDING TO DR.RASHAD KHALIFA VERSE 60:4 THE ARABIC WORD"ALONE"(WAHDAHU) OCCURS ONLY SIX(6) TIMES IN THE QURAN!ONE OF THEM IS "UPHOLDING THE QURAN ALONE (17:46)" THE REFERENCE TO "GOD ALONE"OCCURS IN QURAN VERSES 7:70;39:45;40:12&84 AND 60:4.THE SUM OF THESE NUMBERS(7+70+39+45+40+12+84+60+4) EQUALS 361 OR 19X 19[REFER VERSE 74:30] THUS THE MAIN THEME OF THE QURAN IS "WORSHIP GOD ALONE"![SELAWAT DAN SOLAT UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA} IN Q60:4 WE CAN PRAY FOR GUIDANCE FOR IDOLATERS ,NOT FORGIVENESS SINCE GOD'S LAW IS THAT IDOLATRY IS THE ONLY UNFORGIVEABLE OFFENSE.(4:48 &116)**** KEWUJUDAN PENGGANAS ISIS MASAKINI YANG MENYERUPAI PUAK2 KHAWARIJ YAZID MUAWIYAH YANG MEMBUNUH CUCU NABI MUHAMMAD; BERUSAHA MEMATIKAN ISLAM SELEPAS WAFAT NABI MUHAMMAD DAN DIGANTIKAN DENGAN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG MEMARTABATKAN SYAHADAH KEDUA YANG TIDAK ADA DALAM AL QURAN ;DILARANG ALLAH DALAM Q 63:1-3;Q30:35-34~ KERANA SYIRIK!! DALAMPADA ITU MENGELUARKAN HUKUM2 YANG TIDAK DIREDHAI ALLAH DALAM Q42:21 TELAH MENYESATKAN UMMAH DARIPADA JALAN ALLAH YANG LURUS(SURAH AL FATEHAH ;SURAH AL IKHLAS)BERTAUHID DAN BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA2 MATA!IMAM2 MAZHAB MELALUI KITAB2 MAZHAB(SELAIN AL QURAN SEBAGAI RUJUKAN SUMBER HUKUM Q6:114;45:6-7)ULAMAK2 MAZHAB TANPA SEDAR TELAH MENENTANG PERLEMBAGAAN MALAYSIA DIMANA ISLAM ADALAH AGAMA RASMI PERSEKUTUAN DAN BUKAN AGAMA2 MAZHAB AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH /WAHABI ATAU SALAFI ATAU MANA2 MAZHAB YANG DILARANG OLEH NABI MUHAMMAD DALAM AL QURAN 30:30-35!.ADALAH SAH ENAKMEN SYARIAH YANG BERUNSUR POLYTHIESME CUBA BERTEDUH DIBAWAH NAUNGAN AGAMA ISLAM BERCIRI MONOTHEISME YANG BERTERASKAN IMAN DAN TAUHID PADA ALLAH SAHAJA MANAKALA SYAHADAH ALLAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM "WUJUD DALAM AL QURAN Q3:18;47:19 MANAKALA SELAWAT SERTA SYAFAAT ITU ADALAH SEMUA KEPUNYAAN ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA DAN TIDAK DIKONGSIKAN DENGAN SESIAPAPUN! !!Q64:1;3:19;3:79;2:48;40:18;74:30;Q33:41-42;12:103:12:106!! DECLARATION OF FAITH!~Q3:18.THE PROCLAIMATION OF FAITH(SYAHADAH) THAT IS DECREED BY GOD IS, "THERE IS NO god EXCEPT GOD, IN ARABIC."LA ELLAAHA ELLA ALLAH"(see also 37:35,47:19). THE CORRUPTED "MUSLIMS" INSIST UPON ADDING A SECOND "SYAHADAH" PROCLAIMING THAT MUHAMMAD IS GOD'S MESSENGER.THIS IS BY DEFINITION "SYIRIK"(SHIRK IDOLATRY) AND A FLAGRANT DEFIANCE OF GOD AND HIS MESSENGER(63:1-3;30:35, 72:18-20;18:110)ADDITIONALLY, IT VIOLATES THE MAJOR COMMANDMENTS IN 2:136,2:285;3:84 &4:150-152. PROHIBITING ANY DISTINCTION AMONG GOD'S MESSENGERS"BY PROCLAIMING THAT "MUHAMMAD IS A MESSENGER OF GOD" AND FAILING TO MAKE THE SAME PROCLAIMATION FOR OTHER MESSENGERS SUCH AS ABRAHAM,MOSES,JESUS,SALEH, AND JONAH A DISTINCTION IS COMMITTED AND A MAJOR COMMANDMENT IS VIOLATED". HADIS2 YANG MENDEWA2KAN DAN MEMUJI NABI MUHAMMAD MEMANG BANYAK TERMASUKLAH KALIMAH SYAHADAH KEDUA ,SELAWAT KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD KERANA MEMUDAHKAN MENDAPAT SYAFAAT NABI MUHAMMAD DI AKHIRAT!DALAMPADA ITU WUJUD KENYATAAN OLEH MASYARAKAT MELAYU MASAKINI BAHAWASANYA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU KEKASIH ALLAH DAN PENGHULU SEGALA NABI. BAGINDA MAKSUM DAN MEMPUNYAI KEISTIMEWAAN MEMPUNYAI PENGARUH SYAFAAT DI HARI KIAMAT AKHIRAT!SEMUA HADIS2 INI TERANG2 BERCANGGAH DENGAN AJARAN AL QURAN YANG MELARANG UMMAH MEMPERSEKUTUKAN TUHAN (WUJUD RAKAN KONGSI)DENGAN SESIAPAPUN ATAU APA2PUN(TAUHID). JUSTERU ITU MELARANG UMMAH MEMUJA DAN MENDEWAKAN PEMIMPIN SERTA MELARANG UMMAH MEMBEZABEZAKAN RASUL2 DAN PARA NABI2 ALLAH DIMANA AL QURAN MENYATAKAN BAHAWA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU MANUSIA BIASA(Q18:110) DAN DENGAN TEGAS TIADA SIAPAPUN MEMPUNYAI KUASA SYAFAAT PADA HARI KIAMAT KECUALI ALLAH!ULASAN SERTA KAJIAN ULAMAK2 IKIM ,JAKIM KEBENARAN BAHAWASANYA SEGALA PUJIAN DAN SELAWAT DALAM PERIBADATAN (AZAN DAN SOLAT)ADALAH UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA!TAUHID BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA!!(Q20:14;47:19)Q46:36;64:1,12:106,39:45;39:65;72:18-20;3:18 Q63:1-3!!!READ AND REFER QURAN SURAH AL TAKWEER~81:19-24;SURAH AL DUKHAN~44:13-14;RESEARCH Q3:81;33:7;36:3 [ACCORDING TO MAZHAB ULEMA PROPHET MUHAMMAD WANTS THE UMMAH READ SURAH YASSIN OFTEN IS INDEED A WISE DECISION AS A HIDDEN SECRET IS YET TO BE DISCOVERED??]??!!!!

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

AL FATEHAH!~THE BOOKS OF HADITH REPORTED THE PROPHET’S ORDERS TO WRITE DOWN NOTHING FROM HIM EXCEPT THE QURAN!(Q69:44-47)TWO SUCH HADITHS TAKEN FROM HADITHISTS MOST RELIABLE SOURCES SAHIH MUSLIM AND IS-HAAH AHMAD IBN HANBAL” THE PROPHET SAID ,”DO NOT WRITE DOWN ANYTHING FROM ME EXCEPT THE QURAN”[AHMED,VOL.1,PAGE 171,AND SAHIH MUSLIM] .Another HADITH states that THE PROPHET MAINTAINED HIS ANTI HADITH STAND UNTIL DEATH [AHMED ,vol 1,page 192].SAHABAT NABI~ OMAR BERKATA:”QURAN MENCUKUPI UNTUK KITA,USAH DITULIS APA-APA DARI NABI “[Bukhari,Jihad 176,Cizya 6,Ilim49,Marza 17,Megazi83,Iusam26,Muslim,Vasiyya 20,21,22]* Surah Al-Ankaboot 29:52[Say. "Allah suffices as a witness between Me and you.He knows everything in the heavens and the earth.Q13:43;48:28;4:79;17:45-46; Surely,those who believe in falsehood and disbelieve in ALLAH are the real losers.] note again ALLAH SUFFICES AS A WITNESS BETWEEN ME AND YOU.Q4:79. IS THE SECOND SYAHADAH. IN AZAN AND SALAT..” the deification or worship of anyone or anything other than the singular God, or more literally the establishment of “partners” placed beside God. It is the vice that is opposed to the virtue of tawhid (monotheism)”40:12;6:19;38;114;115!! IN CRYSTAL CLEAR DEFIANCE OF ALLAH’S COMMANDMENT IN Q 72:18 REMEMBER ALLAH’S COMMANDMENT IN Q72:18] THE PLACES OF WORSHIP BELONG TO ALLAH DO NOT CALL (INVOKE) ON ANYONE ELSE BESIDE ALLAH. ANYONE ELSE INCLUDES PROPHET MUHAMMAD ,PROPHET ABRAHAM ANY SECT LEADERS DEAD OR ALIVE ARE IDOLS AND THEREFORE “SHIRK”.MAZHAB FOLLOWERS WHO uphold the idolatry second syahadah not found in the HOLY QURAN are not MUSLIMS (Q63:1-3)Prophet Muhammad DISOWN ALL MAZHAB in verse Q30:30:35 !GOD DID NOT AUTHORISED THEIR DECLARATION OF FAITH!Please refrain from calling ALL THOSE MAZHAB followers as MUSLIM because in reality they are MUNAFEQOON!ONLY MONOTHEIST WHO UPHOLDS THE SYAHADAH OF THE AL QURAN OF Q3:18 CAN CLAIM THEMSELSVES MUSLIMS IN Q3:19

[@silentgood4425]

he ...he...he

[@mahariism]

Sutiamursali . . It is not abt being enemies of Islam. It is abt whether what we have believe so far is true. No matter how is the origin of hadiths the fact is it is not the word of God. God has given us His words that hv no doubts n we still need other than His words?

[@mahariism]

I can guarantee u that even if I can prove it to u it will never be good enough for pple like u. The next thing u will ask me to show u God. I think u know there is a verse abt this in the Quran.? Again it is useless arguing with pple like u. Peace to u.

[@darimiwamubarak]

Hey, why are you trying to be a coward and post your replies on public instead of answering my question. I ask you a simple question. Prove to me that the Quran you have today is the same as the Quran that the Prophet Muhammad preached. That's all. Prove it using primary and secondary sources. If you can't do that just admit it. Don't try to insist on having the last word when you don't even have the basic knowledge of what you speak of.

[@mahariism]

+suriamarsuli . earlier I hv asked u to give me one point of argument that hv been refuted. This will convince me that the book u mentioned is worth my timel reading it.

[@darimiwamubarak]

mahari jofar Can't resist having the last word, can't ya? Answer my question. You claim that the Quran we have today is the same Quran that the Prophet Muhammad preached. Prove your claims using primary and secondary sources

[@darimiwamubarak]

mahari jofar If I refuted only ONE POINT, will you promise that you will read the citations that I've presented?

[@zurinmatzin9046]

Nk dgr pon xsmngt sb cra pnyampaian tu susah nk phm xcm uai

[@khalidalwalid3146]

+Zurin Matzin Ini cara intelektual bro. Janganlah kita beranggapan semua org mesti jadi mcm UAI. Lain org lain cara pendekatan. Susah apa nye?

[@mrmz3802]

+Zurin Matzin Haha... klo jenis hati kering susah skit nak masuk blajar ape bende pun..

[@ezharjaafar2960]

Yusnita phm tak dia ckp ape.. ke nk bgi sy terangkan.

[@mahariism]

Suriamarsuli. We be never claimed to be the latest . but the issue here whether our arguments stands. That's all. Name calling is of no use. Again nobody guides but God. All praise b to Him alone.

[@darimiwamubarak]

Answer my question. Prove that the Quran you have today is the same as the Quran that the Prophet Muhammad preached. That's all.

[@mahariism]

suriamarsuli u want me to show u those written on pulps n leathers? To me the miracles of the Quran are enough proof that the Quran we hv now is God inspired and is the same one MESSAGE that is at the time of the Prophet.

[@darimiwamubarak]

mahari jofar Here's the kicker. How do you know Quran contain linguistic miracles? Do you know classical Arabic?

[@mahariism]

suriamarsuli . of all the points of arguments u chosen this? Your choice really reinforces my belief that the hadiths should not be taken seriously. This argument is very arbitrarily controversial. Of course if u r the one who believe in the hadiths this version suits u well but if u f not then it will be different. Is not so? Same with the word 88

[@mahariism]

suriamarsuli . cont. . u see this argument hv nothing to do with with the hadiths as a valid source of reference. Even among Arabic speaking pple they still can't agree ony many interpretations of the Quran. Some like to base on the hadiths while some like to base on the context of the verse. No matter I will try to read this book u recommended.

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH SELURUH NUSANTARA!! PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ANAK ANAK MASAKINI TELAH TERDEDAH KEPADA DOKTRIN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG BERSELINDUNG DENGAN NAMA ISLAM [3:19-85]SEKIAN LAMA ! MASA TIBA AJARAN AGAMA ISLAM SEBENAR DIKEMBALIKAN KE INSTITUSI PENGAJIAN MASAKINI YANG DIKAWAL OLEH PENDIDIK 2 YANG MASIH ANGGAP SYAHADAH KEDUA ITU ADALAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM" DAN MEREKA INILAH PENGAMAL ISLAM LIBERAL! SOALAN KEPADA USTAZ2 DAN USTAZAH2 JAKIM ,IKIM ,ASWJ WAHABI, SALAFI,QADIANI,PAN,PAS UMNO! CABARAN TERBESAR ORANG2 MELAYU SERTA UMAT ISLAM DI MALAYSIA DIJURUSKAN KEARAH MENGEMBALIKAN ISLAM YANG DI AJAR OLEH ALLAH(Q55:1-2)MELALUI MALAIKATNYA KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD YANG TERDAPAT DIDALAM KITAB AL QURAN SERTA SYAHADAH TAUHIDNYA DALAM Q3:18;47:19 DAN ISLAM DALAM Q3:19 SERTA MENOLAK AJARAN IMAM2 MAZHAB YANG MEMBAWA AGAMA MAZHAB WAHABI ;ASWJ; SYIAH ;SALAFIS DLL BERSAMA DOKTRIN DUA SUMBER HUKUM YANG DILARANG ALLAH DALAM 6:114;45:6-7. AFTER MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH OF THE QURAN. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PROVED THAT THE QURAN IS INDEED THE INFALLIBLE WORD OF GOD. HIS CONTINUED RESEARCH UNVIELED A STARTLING FACT.THE EXTREME POPULAR"HADITH AND SUNNA" HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND THE ADHERENCE THERETO REPRESENTS FLAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF GOD AND HIS FINAL PROPHET.(QURAN 6:112& 25:31).TELLING THE MAZHAB FOLLOWERS THAT "HADITH AND SUNNA"ARE SATANIC INVENTIONS IS THE SAME AS TELLING THE CHRISTIANS THAT JESUS IS NOT THE SON OF GOD !![45:6;12:111;31:6;17:77,33:62;48:23;6:114] Unfortunately IMAM SYAFIEE was UNABLE TO ANALYSE COMPREHENSIVELY AS DR.RASHAD KHALIFA WITHOUT THE COMPUTER IN THE MODERN AGE.ASWJ WAHABI AND SYIA FACTIONS TRY TO PROMOTE THEIR IDOLS WITHOUT SUCCESS(Q30:30-35).IMAM SYAFIEE AND IMAM BUKHARI FAIL TO ESTABLISH THAT THE ILLEGAL AND ANTI QURANIC CONCOCTION OF SECOND DECLARATION OF FAITH(Q30:35 which led astray the mazhab followers) AND SUPPORT OF IMAM BUKHARI SECOND SOURCE OF RELIGIOUS GUIDANCE(4:116;6:114) IS CONSIDERED IDOLATRY(SYIRIK;SHIRK)BY ALLAH~Q6:114;42:21;39:45;40:12;47:19!! Q63:1-3;72:18-20;18:110 [RAMAI UMMAH TERPESONG Q30:30-35) TANPA SEDAR MASAKINI!!!! THEY ARE INDEED THE IDOLATERS!! ACCORDING TO DR.RASHAD KHALIFA VERSE 60:4 THE ARABIC WORD"ALONE"(WAHDAHU) OCCURS ONLY SIX(6) TIMES IN THE QURAN!ONE OF THEM IS "UPHOLDING THE QURAN ALONE (17:46)" THE REFERENCE TO "GOD ALONE"OCCURS IN QURAN VERSES 7:70;39:45;40:12&84 AND 60:4.THE SUM OF THESE NUMBERS(7+70+39+45+40+12+84+60+4) EQUALS 361 OR 19X 19[REFER VERSE 74:30] THUS THE MAIN THEME OF THE QURAN IS "WORSHIP GOD ALONE"![SELAWAT DAN SOLAT UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA} IN Q60:4 WE CAN PRAY FOR GUIDANCE FOR IDOLATERS ,NOT FORGIVENESS SINCE GOD'S LAW IS THAT IDOLATRY IS THE ONLY UNFORGIVEABLE OFFENSE.(4:48 &116)** KEWUJUDAN PENGGANAS ISIS MASAKINI YANG MENYERUPAI PUAK2 KHAWARIJ YAZID MUAWIYAH YANG MEMBUNUH CUCU NABI MUHAMMAD; BERUSAHA MEMATIKAN ISLAM SELEPAS WAFAT NABI MUHAMMAD DAN DIGANTIKAN DENGAN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG MEMARTABATKAN SYAHADAH KEDUA YANG TIDAK ADA DALAM AL QURAN ;DILARANG ALLAH DALAM Q 63:1-3;Q30:35-34~ KERANA SYIRIK!! DALAMPADA ITU MENGELUARKAN HUKUM2 YANG TIDAK DIREDHAI ALLAH DALAM Q42:21 TELAH MENYESATKAN UMMAH DARIPADA JALAN ALLAH YANG LURUS(SURAH AL FATEHAH ;SURAH AL IKHLAS)BERTAUHID DAN BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA2 MATA!IMAM2 MAZHAB MELALUI KITAB2 MAZHAB(SELAIN AL QURAN SEBAGAI RUJUKAN SUMBER HUKUM Q6:114;45:6-7)ULAMAK2 MAZHAB TANPA SEDAR TELAH MENENTANG PERLEMBAGAAN MALAYSIA DIMANA ISLAM ADALAH AGAMA RASMI PERSEKUTUAN DAN BUKAN AGAMA2 MAZHAB AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH /WAHABI ATAU SALAFI ATAU MANA2 MAZHAB YANG DILARANG OLEH NABI MUHAMMAD DALAM AL QURAN 30:30-35!.ADALAH SAH ENAKMEN SYARIAH YANG BERUNSUR POLYTHIESME CUBA BERTEDUH DIBAWAH NAUNGAN AGAMA ISLAM BERCIRI MONOTHEISME YANG BERTERASKAN IMAN DAN TAUHID PADA ALLAH SAHAJA MANAKALA SYAHADAH ALLAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM "WUJUD DALAM AL QURAN Q3:18;47:19 MANAKALA SELAWAT SERTA SYAFAAT ITU ADALAH SEMUA KEPUNYAAN ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA DAN TIDAK DIKONGSIKAN DENGAN SESIAPAPUN! !!Q64:1;3:19;3:79;2:48;40:18;74:30;Q33:41-42;12:103:12:106!! DECLARATION OF FAITH!~Q3:18.THE PROCLAIMATION OF FAITH(SYAHADAH) THAT IS DECREED BY GOD IS, "THERE IS NO god EXCEPT GOD, IN ARABIC."LA ELLAAHA ELLA ALLAH"(see also 37:35,47:19). THE CORRUPTED "MUSLIMS" INSIST UPON ADDING A SECOND "SYAHADAH" PROCLAIMING THAT MUHAMMAD IS GOD'S MESSENGER.THIS IS BY DEFINITION "SYIRIK"(SHIRK IDOLATRY) AND A FLAGRANT DEFIANCE OF GOD AND HIS MESSENGER(63:1-3;30:35, 72:18-20;18:110)ADDITIONALLY, IT VIOLATES THE MAJOR COMMANDMENTS IN 2:136,2:285;3:84 &4:150-152. PROHIBITING ANY DISTINCTION AMONG GOD'S MESSENGERS"BY PROCLAIMING THAT "MUHAMMAD IS A MESSENGER OF GOD" AND FAILING TO MAKE THE SAME PROCLAIMATION FOR OTHER MESSENGERS SUCH AS ABRAHAM,MOSES,JESUS,SALEH, AND JONAH A DISTINCTION IS COMMITTED AND A MAJOR COMMANDMENT IS VIOLATED". HADIS2 YANG MENDEWA2KAN DAN MEMUJI NABI MUHAMMAD MEMANG BANYAK TERMASUKLAH KALIMAH SYAHADAH KEDUA ,SELAWAT KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD KERANA MEMUDAHKAN MENDAPAT SYAFAAT NABI MUHAMMAD DI AKHIRAT!DALAMPADA ITU WUJUD KENYATAAN OLEH MASYARAKAT MELAYU MASAKINI BAHAWASANYA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU KEKASIH ALLAH DAN PENGHULU SEGALA NABI. BAGINDA MAKSUM DAN MEMPUNYAI KEISTIMEWAAN MEMPUNYAI PENGARUH SYAFAAT DI HARI KIAMAT AKHIRAT!SEMUA HADIS2 INI TERANG2 BERCANGGAH DENGAN AJARAN AL QURAN YANG MELARANG UMMAH MEMPERSEKUTUKAN TUHAN (WUJUD RAKAN KONGSI)DENGAN SESIAPAPUN ATAU APA2PUN(TAUHID). JUSTERU ITU MELARANG UMMAH MEMUJA DAN MENDEWAKAN PEMIMPIN SERTA MELARANG UMMAH MEMBEZABEZAKAN RASUL2 DAN PARA NABI2 ALLAH DIMANA AL QURAN MENYATAKAN BAHAWA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU MANUSIA BIASA(Q18:110) DAN DENGAN TEGAS TIADA SIAPAPUN MEMPUNYAI KUASA SYAFAAT PADA HARI KIAMAT KECUALI ALLAH!ULASAN SERTA KAJIAN ULAMAK2 IKIM ,JAKIM KEBENARAN BAHAWASANYA SEGALA PUJIAN DAN SELAWAT DALAM PERIBADATAN (AZAN DAN SOLAT)ADALAH UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA!TAUHID BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA!!(Q20:14;47:19)Q46:36;64:1,12:106,39:45;39:65;72:18-20;3:18 Q63:1-3!!!READ AND REFER QURAN SURAH AL TAKWEER~81:19-24;SURAH AL DUKHAN~44:13-14;RESEARCH Q3:81;33:7;36:3 [ACCORDING TO MAZHAB ULEMA PROPHET MUHAMMAD WANTS THE UMMAH READ SURAH YASSIN OFTEN IS INDEED A WISE DECISION AS A HIDDEN SECRET IS YET TO BE DISCOVERED??]??!!!!BERSAMA2LAH KITA CARI KEBENARAN!

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ BUKANKAH SURAH AL HAQQAH Q69:43-48 YANG JELAS MELARANG NABI MUHAMMAD MENGELUARKAN HUKUMNYA SENDIRI YANG TIDAK DIREDHAI ALLAH SELAIN APA YANG ADA DALAM AL QURAN ITU??!Q42:21!!HANYA SUNNAH ALLAH ITU SAJA YANG DIBENARKAN!!MACAM MANA TU USTAZ!??3- Third version, "I left for you what if you hold on to, you will never be misguided, the book of God." Moslim 15/19, nu 1218; Ibn Majah 25/84, Abu dawud 11/56.

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH NUSANTARA! THE FIRST QUESTION NEED TO BE ASK BY THE UMMAH IN MALAYSIA IS THIS~WHICH FINAL PROCLAIMATION OF PROPHET MUHAMMAD DO THEY FOLLOW! AL-FATEHAH! The farewell Pilgrimage of the prophet Muhammed is a corner stone in the Muslim history. The Final Sermon given by the Prophet during this pilgrimage was witnessed by thousands of Muslims. There are however three versions of this sermon in the hadiths books. This by itself reflects the degree of corruption of the hadith books as this is the most witnessed speech of the prophet Muhammed. 1- First version, " I left for you what if you hold on to, you will never be misguided, the book of God and my family. Moslim 44/4, Nu2408; Ibn Hanbal4/366; darimi 23/1, nu 3319. This is the version made up by the Shi'te Muslims. 2-Second version, "I left for you what if you hold on to, you will never be misguided, the book of God and my sunnah" . Muwatta, 46/3 This is the version made up by the Sunni Muslims. 3- Third version, "I left for you what if you hold on to, you will never be misguided, the book of God." Moslim 15/19, nu 1218; Ibn Majah 25/84, Abu dawud 11/56. This last version is the version hated by the Sunni and Shiite Muslims alike. This is the only version which conforms with the repeated assertion in the Quran that Muhammed's message was only the Quran. Many Sunni Muslims and Shiite Muslims do not even know that this version of the sermon exists. In reality, they do not want to know, the truth hurts. Prophet Muhammad last sermon provides key to the existence of distorted ISLAM by MAZHAB Preachers who uphold idolatry dogma of the MAZHAB religion.Q30:30-35. QUESTION!ARE MAZHAB FOLLOWERS TODAY~ ISLAM OR MUNAFEQOON / MUSYRIKUN??

[@zainalarifinbinyasin3049]

There must be a different between the genius and the fool..

[@PanglimaBerkumis3000]

Ustaz buat monologue, memang senang cakap. Cuba pi berdebat dgn Tun, tgk mcm mana kamu punya hebat time tu? #publisitimurahan

[@teppanchef69]

PanglimaBerkumis3000 Tun Mahathir suh dia p debat dengan TGHH dan Anwar . Dia Sendiri pun datang kuliah dan iktiraf keilmuan Dr Maza.

[@bulannn2024]

apa mcm skrg bro?? still sokong lg tun ke? syok tgk islam skrg?

[@AhmadAhmad-wj2xc]

Tun liberal ke tu haha

[@abdulwahabmohamad9440]

Hang ni salman sembang seorang diri boleh lah..jom lah berdebat..

[@hakimiazizan7372]

yg bercakap pun fahaman ibnu Taimiyyah dan Muhammad Abdul Wahhab tauhid 3 serangkai

[@abdr1114]

Manusia bole membezakan baik & buruk..apa yang aku lihat cara mu bercakap penuh dengan kebencian dan kedengkian terhadap seseorang aku benci orang yang tidak menyelesaikan masalah dengan sopan santun aku benci orang yang membencihi saudaranya sendiri. = aku anti sifat buruk

[@danielsufi6572]

Bagng

[@mahariism]

Suriamarsuli . since u have read the refutations y don't u give me some of the refutations to the kassim Ahmad arguments? U r fond if making generalizations of ur claims. Lets be more specific. Quran doesn't need people like bukari n Muslim. U know y? Becoz Quran is the word of God. Hadiths need them becoz it is the word if man. Muslims r told that the words of pple like bukhari n muslim r unquestionable. Word of man? If this is not idolization or syirik then I don't know what is.

[@darimiwamubarak]

LMAO. Exposing yourself as a true coward that you are, instead of replying to my comment, you make your comment public because you were too scared that I would be notified of your reply. It just show the fact that deviants and Zindeeq like you are very afraid to debate their beliefs. In my previous comments, I have given you an extensive footnote and works that have totally refuted the arguments brought by Kassim Ahmad. Have you read it? I bet you haven't, right? Because I have read the work of Kassim Ahmad, and believe me what he wrote was the same old rehash arguments that was bring up way back by Goldziher, a Hungarian Jew. Tell me smart guy, have you read the refutation that I've sent to you? Do you even know who is Ignaz Goldziher?

[@mahariism]

I hv read one too many n it is the same old arguments put forward pple like u. Just like the Christians who still want to believe that Jesus is the son of God no matter how ridiculous that idea is. I believe u can better relate urself to them right?

[@mahariism]

What good if i even know this man Goldziher? What good if I even know who kassim ahmad really is? What matters really is the TRUTH. If u still don't get this . again sorry its no use for me or even u to go anywhere in this arguments.

[@darimiwamubarak]

mahari jofar Typical and expected reply from a heretic like you. Point being that I've refuted all of your and also (Kassim Ahmad, Ignaz Goldziher ) arguments when I've cited the readings that you have to do. You know what? Instead of attacking me without knowledge, why don't you first try to read the works that I've provided in my previous comments. I've read Kassim Ahmad's work, have you read the work I've presented to you? Let's make this a scholarly argument. Try to refute my points academically, instead of hurling insults at me. Truth? LMAO!!!! You wouldn't know the truth even if it hits you in the face and you dare talk about it? It just shows your cowardness that you still afraid to read the books I've cited to you. And still hold on to the false beliefs that was brought upon by Ignaz Goldziher, a Hungarian Jew who was obviously trying to attack Islam. Instead of protecting the religion, you jump on the bandwagon he made to attack Islam along with him, but you're just too DUMB to see it yourself

[@mahariism]

suriamarsuli let put the whole arguments in a nutshell. Is not idolization or shirik to believe that the word of man is beyond reproach? If u still believe that it isn't than let's forget abt this argument.

[@joejetto3328]

ang tu muhammad la chek oiii!!!!! (sesat la aku.....) hahahahaha

[@mohdizwan3142]

Tu la pasai...haha

[@azrichelsea6196]

Dia ni banyan balon ketom ni...

[@look_man0801]

joe jetto Sesat di mata manusia tak sama sesat dimata tuhan.. Hehe...

[@xloclx]

Geng lepat mmg takde ayat lain.. bosan.. 🥱🥱😴😴😴

[@taurusazazil3710]

Man prata 2 kuah campur kasi banjir ok....👍

[@xloclx]

Buat apa makan prata? Makan je la lepat.. 😁

[@azimdeen6269]

cukuplah Al Quran utk pegangan...

[@wanzahidin]

Azim Deen solat umat Islam Hari ni mengikut Sunnah/Hadis nabi. Kamu solat ikut Quran ker? Org anti-Hadis tak payah solat. Setuju Tak???

[@sheryyacob4020]

Orang ni cakap pun kontridik dirinya sendiri. Saya rasa dia belum faham alQurun.

[@fiquexii4970]

Apa yg kontadik nya?

[@suncai1]

Ustaz ni, berbelik-belik, sekali dia kata, Kasim Ahmad Anti Hadis di hukum kafir sesat oleh beliau, dan dalam masa yang sama juga, beliau juga berkata, Nabi larang para sahabatnya tulis hadisnya. jadi pak kasim nak percaya hadis nama lagi, kalau semua hadis yang di tulis oleh para sahabatnya itu telah di padang oleh mareka???

[@yusnitahalina5354]

Kebanyakan pemuja hadis tulisan tangan manusia ni, mereka sntiasa sahaja berbelit-belit. ini kerana Allah menjanjikan kebatilan tidak akan kekal lama. sebab itulah kita dapati kebanyakan mereka apabila di asak, tidak mampu utk memberikan jawapan yg bernas dan tepat. semuanya hanya mengikut agakan dan sangkaan.. dan ayat paling menarik bagi mereka, dalam agama kita x bole gunakan akal...kena jadi bodoh mcm lembu dan puja kata2 ustaz2 mcm mereka tu tokong...

[@yusnitahalina5354]

untuk mendapat maklumat pembacaan dan diskusi ilmiah, sila layari.. ashwed1973.blogspot.my/

[@suncai1]

terima kasih....

[@yusnitahalina5354]

sama2..

[@suncai1]

tolong ulas blog di bawah ini mahyosof-mahyosof-kitabsuci.blogspot.com/2016/05/wajibkah-sembahyang-5-waktu.html

[@nydayunus8873]

???? Ape citer ni, berpusing2 x da fact. Bunyi percakapan sedap, tp x da isi n point support.

[@look_man0801]

NydaYunus AQ 6:112... Kot? Hehe.....

[@xloclx]

Mmg la saudara tak nampak fakta, sebab iblis dah duduk dalam akal saudara.. nafsu dah beraja dalam hati.. org lain elok je paham.. 😊

[@kapisa88]

dh bodo...otak tepu...tu yg x bleh hadam...hehe

[@zafronhaykal8673]

taw mane hadis tu dr muhammad?hadis psl murtadin kne pancung tu rasional ke?sape yg murtad?spe yg tentukan murtad?hahahaha

[@wows898]

dari ustaz/ustazah yang ajar ilmu hadis. zaman khalifah Abu Bakar As-Siddiq, golongan murtad dan tidak membayar zakat diperangi. Terima Al-Quran tapi tolak hadis secara total. Erti kata beriman dengan Allah dan menolak Rasullah S.A.W..

[@fiquexii4970]

Al quran pon diriwayatkan seperti jalan hadith

[@AhmadAhmad-wj2xc]

Barua dap ni haha

[@zulkurnainazlin8069]

Aku pon anti hadis la

[@administrationperson1419]

Hujah yang merapu.. Aku tau , aku pun x berapa setuju dgn golongan anti hadith. Cuma hujah ustaz salman x kuat dan menambahkan kesangsian di masa yang sama menjatuhkan al quran dgn menyamakan hadith dan al quran.. Masha allah.. Salah hujah ni.. Kerana secar Jelas lagi Allah menjaga al quran tidak hadis.. Nak hujah ni kena sebaiknya jangan sembrono jee menggunakan dalil sama dgn keyakinan al quran..

[@bungalalang4832]

Muhaq_Hussain dari mana datangnya hadis yg nabi kata hadis nabi petunjuk yg lebih benar dari quran.. Sedangkan nabi sendiri kata dlm quran.. yg berbunyi., Jangan ikut apa yg di tunjuk oleh para sahabat secara membuta tuli.. tapi sebenar-benar petunjuk adalah petunjuk Allah ( al quran).. Jadi nabi muhammad talam 2 muka lah..

[@administrationperson1419]

BungaLalang saya x cakap pun hadith lebih atau sama darjat dengan alquran.. Cuba awak baca elok2 dgn penulisan saya kat atas tu.. Malah saya katakan ustaz salman telah salah dalam mentafsirkan sumber hukum dan hujah. Hanya sebab dia kagum dgn ketertiban al hadits dan method hadits.. Tak bermaksud mutlak kebenaran hadits tu

[@bungalalang4832]

Muhaq_Hussain Maaf sdra muhaq..saya tersilap.. ustaz salman bukanlah berhujjah dgn hadis yg tak tepat..ttp memanglah hadis banyak dusta kpd nabi... cuba fahamkan ayat 3:73 & 74.. nabi suruh ikut al quran.. ahli kitab taurat yg kafir suruh ikut petunjuk sahabat yakni SUNNAH .. Sebab tu ada HADIS BUKHORI DAN SEBAGAINYA.. kerana HADIS INILAH yg ahli kitab taurat yg kafir itu MAKSUDKAN... kerana ahli kitab taurat yg kafir lah yg mereka hadis-hadis ni...

[@administrationperson1419]

BungaLalang maaf saya x mampu bersetuju dgn pandangan awak.. Tapi x bermaksud saya setuju dgn ustaz salman.. Sifat meninggikan sesuatu yg selain al quran adalah salah.. Saya hanya kriti dari sudut dia menyampaikan kepentingan hadits..

[@bungalalang4832]

Muhaq_Hussain Kalau sdra muhaq berminat utk kita bincang kan dgn lebih lanjut samada hadis atau salat atau puasa atau haji dsbnya pun bulih jugak.. dgn tujuan utk jalan kebenaran ..iaitu petunjuk jalan benar.. Berkata antara pengikut dgn ketua mereka pada hari pengadilan.. Pengikut : kamulah (ketua ikutan) yg menyesatkan kami siang Dan malam. Jika tidak kerana kamu mengajarkan Kami semasa di dunia dahulu sudah tentu kami Di azab sekarang ni..sepatutnya kamu kenalah Menanggung dosa-dosa kami. Ketua : jika sekiranya kami mendapat petunjuk jalan benar dari Allah sudah tentu kami mengajarkan kpd kamu. Tetapi Sekarang ni tiada berguna apa lagi dan kami tidak lah Menanggung dosa kamu.. sama-samalah kita menerima Balasan azab dari Allah..

[@mahariism]

Suriamarsuli . . u only need to answer my question. Is it not idol worship or syirik to believe that the word of man us beyond reproach or unquestionable. If u still won't answer my question than know that u can fool yourself but not God. Peace.

[@darimiwamubarak]

And one more thing dummy, nobody is saying that a humans word is similar to Quranic verses. However, the Quran itself instruct us to follow what the Prophet said. He who obeys the Messenger, obeys Allah: But if any turn away, We have not sent thee to watch over their (evil deeds). (The Noble Qur'an 4:80) “Your Companion is neither astray nor being misled. Nor does he say (aught) of (his own) Desire. It is no less than inspiration sent down to him."(The Noble Qur'an 53:2-4) And the Quran clearly states that there is the existence of Sunnah (Hadith) which serve as a guide to understand Quran. "We have not instructed the (Prophet) in Poetry, nor is it meet for him: this is no less than a Message and a Qur'an making things clear: 036.069" Tell me, what is the "Message" here referred to in the Quran? It is definitely not the whims and desires of yours to interpret this as something else other than the Sunnah Simple question to you? Do you even know Arabic to know the context, the cause of revelation (Asbabun Nuzul) and also the classical language of the Arabs to even understand the Quran? No, right? The Hadith served as a guide for us to understand the Quran, and I don't see what's so ridiculous about that.

[@darimiwamubarak]

Only someone who possessed a dark, evil heart like a heretic that you are would accused these Hadith scholars of lying in the name of the Prophet. Do you even know the vigorous process in the authentication of Hadith? No you don't. Dr. Jonathan Brown, after studying Hadith for years, managed to refute the arguments of the Anti Hadith like you. He basically refutes the arguments brought by his predecessor, Ignaz Goldziher and definitely refuted the same rehash arguments brought by Kassim Ahmad. I repeat, what Kassim Ahmad brought was not a new idea, Ignaz Goldziher was the first to brought it, and it was extensively refuted by Dr. Jonathan Brown and Dr. Mustafa Al-Sibai'i. Have you read their works? Because I have surely read the work of Kassim Ahmad, and in it he only proved his ignorance of the Hadith science and the Arabic language.

[@mahariism]

Whatever arguments that u hv put here hv been refuted by kassim ahmad's writings n hv the cheek to tell me that u hv read his writings? Who r u trying to fool? Yourself? No matter how good or qualified a person he is still a man not free of error. I posed u a question. Is it not syirik to believe that the word of a man like Bukhari n Muslim is beyond reproach or cannot be questioned. Are these pple r to be revered as tho they r GOD.? Arguing with u so far is like arguing with a wall. I can only wish that God will guide u n pole

[@mahariism]

Like u. Only God guides n nobody can. All praise be to the Almighty Wise. Let others judge on what we HV argued. PEACE.

[@darimiwamubarak]

mahari jofar​​​​ What arguments, you coward? I was right. You are just a COWARD who wouldn't dare to read all the works and citations that I've listed out. And you DARE to have the cheeks to said you have read these works? I have debated the likes of Kassim Ahmad for years. I even personally emailed my refutation to him back in 2010 where I refuted his arguments one by one on every point that he brought up. What have YOU done so far? WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO FOOL? YOU DON'T EVEN DARE TO READ UP ON MY CITATIONS YET YOU SAID KASSIM AHMAD REFUTED ME? Arguing with YOU is like arguing with a DUMB DONKEY. When cannot answer, you just yelled out "Hee Haw" to every of my arguments Nobody here is suggesting that Bukhari and Muslim's work are beyond reproach. What I meant is that all the Hadith that was transmitted to us today was authenticate vigorously and numerous times by many scholars just in order to affirm that the Hadith transmitted goes back to the Prophet himself. One question to you. Who do you believe that passed on the Quran to us today? Isn't it the same scholars whom you ridiculed also played the same role in transmitting the Quran today? But ironically it is these same scholars that you condemned and accused of lying on the issue of Hadith transmission. I ask you a single question, who transmit to you the Quran that we have today? Or do Jibril himself come up and transmitted to you the Quran? See how self-defeating your argument goes? You are just shooting yourself in the foot here. I try to make this debate between us as academically as possible by listing out all the works that refuted Kassim Ahmad's work that I list out. I told you to read them. Instead of reading these works, you proceed to hurl insults to me when I managed to burst your little bubble of imagination that you've been living in. Who are you trying to fool. Do you have any idea how long have I took to read all the works I've presented to you? And now you're trying to fool me by saying you managed to read ALL of them (not to mention refuting it) in a span of a few weeks? But I guess that's typical behavior that was to be expected from a stubborn, dumb donkey heretic like you. You act like you're so smart but when cornered by my arguments, you try to weasel your way out by hurling insults at me. Bravo.....

[@OrchidScent]

Hadis wujud antara 200-300 tahun selepas kewafatan nabi. Surah2 dari al Quran di turun kan terus kepada nabi. Jadi mengapa kekuatan Islam tergantung pada hadis? Quran menjadi seolah2 turun pangkat. Ia tidak boleh berfungsi tanpa bersandar kan hadis. Saya rasa ini lagi parah. Sebab itu lah dalam Islam boleh wujud puak pelampau , itu semua kerana hadis. Hadis menjadi kan Islam rumit. Tapi kalau berdebat, mati2 semua orang kata Islam itu mudah.

[@ishakyahya8342]

Orchid Scent Betui ke pendapat hang ni. Aku tak pernah dengak yg ulamak letak hadid no satu dan Quran no dua. Yg ada Quran sentiasa adalah sumber hukum pertama, lalu dosusuli hadis sebagai sumber hukum kedua kerana hadis menafsir ayat Quran.

[@emmahussain7887]

Orchid Scent ada kesilapan sdkt..hadis wujud pada zaman nabi lagi..para sahabat dh mula menulis hadis,tp zaman tu hadis lbh kpd catatan peribadi sahabat tentang kata2 nabi saw dan perbuatanya..dan apa yg nabi sebut tu jd wahyu..mula2 nabi saw xbg tulis hadis sbb tkut bercampur dgn al quran..slps al quran lengkap nabi saw izinkan..selepas tu para sahabat turunkan kpd tabiin,selepas tu para ulamak memgumpulkan hadis2..al quran byk menurunkan hukum,hadis nabi yg menghuraikan hukum2 itu..wallahutaalaaklam..

[@zuraimizulkifli7317]

Orchid Scent sapa yg mula tulis quran?

[@look_man0801]

ishak yahya AQ 25:33 jawapan utk kamu...

[@ayo9009]

dok bsing2 kat u tube ni tak guna...ape kata kalo geng anti hadis ni pegi bejumpa dgn ustaz2@ulama2 yg mengamal kan hadis ni utk berdebat...ade bran?? itu kalo ade telor la...

[@khalidalwalid3146]

+bdr ayr btul tu bro. Puak2 anti hadis ni hanya pakai lanyak je dlm youtube ni...tapi hampeh

[@yusnitahalina5354]

+bdr ayr ulama yg ada pun xdak telur nk menjawab Kassim ahmad. Lari mencirit cirit bila Kasiim ahmad ajak berdialoq.... tanya ulama malaysia ni ada telur ka...

[@khalidalwalid3146]

zallman ismail ulama lari mencirit2?? Setahu aku kasim ahmad yang terbirit2...dia siap halau org yg dtg ke rumah dia kalau ajak berdebat. Apa yg dia mahu ialah org hanya ikut cakap dia. Ini lah dia iblis tua..

[@yusnitahalina5354]

+khalid alwalid setahu aku mereka x pernah di halau. mereka di halau kerana boadap dan bertindak secara samseng. malah beberapa dialog dengan kassim ahmad di batalkan pada tahun 90-an dengan alsan akidah..kononnya.. dan yg paling menarik, buku kassim ahmad menyuruh kita menilai semula hadis, dan setelah lebih 20 tahun, sekarang JAKIM pun ingin menilai hadis...iblis ialah yg hanya ikut kitab tulisan tangan manusia, tanpa manu merujuk alquran... samalah mcm kaum yahudi dan nasrani.... xde beza pun...

[@muhdaidyzuki7480]

bdr ayr tolak Hadis kapir

[@mahariism]

Nurul mamat. . yg tuan berbahas dgn saya ini pakai apa? Kalo x pakai akal? Yg penting Quran suruh hamba Nya yg beriman gunakan akal. Skrg awak kata x yah gunakan akal? Quran berikan contoh gimana org2 dulu jadi kafir gara2 mengikut jejak datok nenek mereka mereka dgn cara membabi buta. Awak nak ikut mcm org kefir yg dulu2 tu ker?

[@fazrif]

Hehehe..! Lawak la ostad nih. Entah berapa puluh kali dlm video ni dia contradict diri dia sendiri. Bahan Raja Lawak..!!!👍👍👍

[@look_man0801]

muhamad syazwan Kami bukan anti hadis.. Kami ambil hadis paling baik...39:23

[@sayaanda5170]

mungkin mereka bukan menolak hadis, cuma mereka lebih senang ikut Alquran yang telah Allah turunkan kepada Rasullulah, kerana mungkin bagi setengah mereka takut terikut hadis yang tak sahih, jadi jangan lah kita cepat menghukum orang itu ataupun ini, jika dia masih mengunakan syahadah bererti dia pegang pada 5rukun islam dan 6 rukun iman, biarlah Allah sahaja yang nilai kn orang. sebab itu memang hak Allah..bukan hak sesiapa..wallahualam..

[@alanrunner5519]

Saya Anda kalau takot nk ikot balajar dgn guru..bkn belajar sendirian..alquran dan hadith berkait..ya kita faham hadith terlalu byk yg x sahih..so belajar lah..x kn sbb 1 hadith x sahih x nak ikot semua?..solat x diterangkan 1 per 1 dlm alquran..hadith yg terangkan 1 per 1..hadith tu dr Nabi

[@sahar2sahar169]

_ (6:116) "Jika kamu mentaati kebanyakan orang dibumi, mereka akan menyesatkan kamu dari jalan Allah, mereka mengikut hanya sangkaan, semata mata dugaan." Kebanyakan manusia lebih mentaati mereka yg dianggap pintar saperti ulamak, pendeta, sami dan sebagainya. Yang benar adalah mereka yg mentaati firman Tuhan nya saja yaitu Al Quran, Kitabullah. Perlunya hadis itu disaring adalah bukti bahwa hadis itu tidak meyakinkan. Org saperti Bukhori itu tidak yakin alias meragui hadis2 makanya mereka menyaring hadis2 itu. Kalo mereka aja tak yakin apalagi kita? Quran menyatakan ayat2 nya tak ada yg meragukan.. (4:82)"Apa, tidak kah mereka merenungkan AlQuran? Jika ia daripada selain Allah, tentu mereka mendapati didalam nya banyak perselisihan." Hadis, perlu disaring sebab didalam nya banyak perselisihan dan pastinya ia bukan wahyu. Mentaati selain dari firman Allah itu adalah syirik yg nyata. Nauzubillah. Kenyataan ttg masaalah hadis itu bukti bahwa cara solat dan ibadah yg lain nya itu jelas sesuatu yg diada adakan. Ia juga menunjukan ada keperluan utk mengkaji ulang cara kita memahami Quran itu, tanpa hadis. 6:112 "Begitulah Kami mengadakan bagi SETIAP Nabi suatu musuh syaitan2 drpd manusia dan jin yg mewahyukan ucapan palsu yg indah2 kpd satu sama lain utk menipu dan sekiranya Pemelihara kamu menghendaki tentu mereka tidak melakukannya. Maka tinggalkan mereka dan apa yg mereka MENGADA ADAKAN" www.revivers of truth.com dan "HADIS SATU PENILAIAN SEMULA" oleh Dr Kassim Ahmad.

[@Eng-fz9pj]

apa kah Ko cakap ni, merepek lah :) bukan lida lah, tapi Tulisan tangan Nabi Muhammad pbuh :)

[@thermalequilibrium1370]

Lagi merepek, Nabi Muhammad buta huruf. Tang mana tulisan tangan 😂😂😂😂.. Aduh akhir zaman, hahahaha

[@ishakyahya8342]

Fahaman mereka yg sekongkol dg Kassim Ahmad ini sungguh menakjubkan. Mula2 mereka bersama Kassim secara total tolak hadis...jelas2 melanggar perintah AlQuran supaya taat kepada Rasul. Apabila dikatakan kalau tak pakai hadis, bgmn cara solat, cara puasa, haji dsbnya. Kesudut, lalu mereka adjust, katanya kami terima hadith tetapi menolak hadith yg berlawanan dg AlQuran, tetapi masih menyalahkan para ulama besar. Apakah pendirian ini baharu, apakah ulama dahulu tidak pernah ambil kira tentang yg mereka katakan.Apakah mereka tahu disana ada kategori dhoif (lemah) dan maudhu' (palsu) yg semua ulama hadith setuju tidak boleh dijadikan sandaran hukum. Kenapa sampai menolak hadis2 sohih yg jelas2 datang atau telus keNabi. Cuba fikirkan, bagaimana mengambil secara tepat maksud ayat2 Quran, kalau tidak menerima pencerahan melalui hadith atau sunnah. Didalam keadaan dibimbing oleh sunnnah pun timbul kesilapan, apalagi kalau hanya ditafsirkan ikut akal dan nafsu. Ulama2 besar dulu tidak silap dg berpegang kepada hadith dan sunnah Rasul. Yg silap besar adalah 'pengikut Kassim Ahmad' yg hanya tahu hujjah KA yg kepala batu itu.

[@baharuddinshafie2728]

SALAMUN ALAYKUM USTAZ DAN USTAZAH SELURUH NUSANTARA!! PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ANAK ANAK MASAKINI TELAH TERDEDAH KEPADA DOKTRIN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG BERSELINDUNG DENGAN NAMA ISLAM [3:19-85]SEKIAN LAMA ! MASA TIBA AJARAN AGAMA ISLAM SEBENAR DIKEMBALIKAN KE INSTITUSI PENGAJIAN MASAKINI YANG DIKAWAL OLEH PENDIDIK 2 YANG MASIH ANGGAP SYAHADAH KEDUA ITU ADALAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM" DAN MEREKA INILAH PENGAMAL ISLAM LIBERAL! SOALAN KEPADA USTAZ2 DAN USTAZAH2 JAKIM ,IKIM ,ASWJ WAHABI, SALAFI,QADIANI,PAN,PAS UMNO! CABARAN TERBESAR ORANG2 MELAYU SERTA UMAT ISLAM DI MALAYSIA DIJURUSKAN KEARAH MENGEMBALIKAN ISLAM YANG DI AJAR OLEH ALLAH(Q55:1-2)MELALUI MALAIKATNYA KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD YANG TERDAPAT DIDALAM KITAB AL QURAN SERTA SYAHADAH TAUHIDNYA DALAM Q3:18;47:19 DAN ISLAM DALAM Q3:19 SERTA MENOLAK AJARAN IMAM2 MAZHAB YANG MEMBAWA AGAMA MAZHAB WAHABI ;ASWJ; SYIAH ;SALAFIS DLL BERSAMA DOKTRIN DUA SUMBER HUKUM YANG DILARANG ALLAH DALAM 6:114;45:6-7. AFTER MORE THAN 12 YEARS OF COMPUTERIZED RESEARCH OF THE QURAN. PHYSICAL EVIDENCE PROVED THAT THE QURAN IS INDEED THE INFALLIBLE WORD OF GOD. HIS CONTINUED RESEARCH UNVIELED A STARTLING FACT.THE EXTREME POPULAR"HADITH AND SUNNA" HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND THE ADHERENCE THERETO REPRESENTS FLAGRANT DISOBEDIENCE OF GOD AND HIS FINAL PROPHET.(QURAN 6:112& 25:31).TELLING THE MAZHAB FOLLOWERS THAT "HADITH AND SUNNA"ARE SATANIC INVENTIONS IS THE SAME AS TELLING THE CHRISTIANS THAT JESUS IS NOT THE SON OF GOD !![45:6;12:111;31:6;17:77,33:62;48:23;6:114] Unfortunately IMAM SYAFIEE was UNABLE TO ANALYSE COMPREHENSIVELY AS DR.RASHAD KHALIFA WITHOUT THE COMPUTER IN THE MODERN AGE.ASWJ WAHABI AND SYIA FACTIONS TRY TO PROMOTE THEIR IDOLS WITHOUT SUCCESS(Q30:30-35).IMAM SYAFIEE AND IMAM BUKHARI FAIL TO ESTABLISH THAT THE ILLEGAL AND ANTI QURANIC CONCOCTION OF SECOND DECLARATION OF FAITH(Q30:35 which led astray the mazhab followers) AND SUPPORT OF IMAM BUKHARI SECOND SOURCE OF RELIGIOUS GUIDANCE(4:116;6:114) IS CONSIDERED IDOLATRY(SYIRIK;SHIRK)BY ALLAH~Q6:114;42:21;39:45;40:12;47:19!! Q63:1-3;72:18-20;18:110 [RAMAI UMMAH TERPESONG Q30:30-35) TANPA SEDAR MASAKINI!!!! THEY ARE INDEED THE IDOLATERS!! ACCORDING TO DR.RASHAD KHALIFA VERSE 60:4 THE ARABIC WORD"ALONE"(WAHDAHU) OCCURS ONLY SIX(6) TIMES IN THE QURAN!ONE OF THEM IS "UPHOLDING THE QURAN ALONE (17:46)" THE REFERENCE TO "GOD ALONE"OCCURS IN QURAN VERSES 7:70;39:45;40:12&84 AND 60:4.THE SUM OF THESE NUMBERS(7+70+39+45+40+12+84+60+4) EQUALS 361 OR 19X 19[REFER VERSE 74:30] THUS THE MAIN THEME OF THE QURAN IS "WORSHIP GOD ALONE"![SELAWAT DAN SOLAT UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA} IN Q60:4 WE CAN PRAY FOR GUIDANCE FOR IDOLATERS ,NOT FORGIVENESS SINCE GOD'S LAW IS THAT IDOLATRY IS THE ONLY UNFORGIVEABLE OFFENSE.(4:48 &116)** KEWUJUDAN PENGGANAS ISIS MASAKINI YANG MENYERUPAI PUAK2 KHAWARIJ YAZID MUAWIYAH YANG MEMBUNUH CUCU NABI MUHAMMAD; BERUSAHA MEMATIKAN ISLAM SELEPAS WAFAT NABI MUHAMMAD DAN DIGANTIKAN DENGAN AGAMA MAZHAB YANG MEMARTABATKAN SYAHADAH KEDUA YANG TIDAK ADA DALAM AL QURAN ;DILARANG ALLAH DALAM Q 63:1-3;Q30:35-34~ KERANA SYIRIK!! DALAMPADA ITU MENGELUARKAN HUKUM2 YANG TIDAK DIREDHAI ALLAH DALAM Q42:21 TELAH MENYESATKAN UMMAH DARIPADA JALAN ALLAH YANG LURUS(SURAH AL FATEHAH ;SURAH AL IKHLAS)BERTAUHID DAN BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA2 MATA!IMAM2 MAZHAB MELALUI KITAB2 MAZHAB(SELAIN AL QURAN SEBAGAI RUJUKAN SUMBER HUKUM Q6:114;45:6-7)ULAMAK2 MAZHAB TANPA SEDAR TELAH MENENTANG PERLEMBAGAAN MALAYSIA DIMANA ISLAM ADALAH AGAMA RASMI PERSEKUTUAN DAN BUKAN AGAMA2 MAZHAB AHLUL SUNNAH WAL JEMAAH /WAHABI ATAU SALAFI ATAU MANA2 MAZHAB YANG DILARANG OLEH NABI MUHAMMAD DALAM AL QURAN 30:30-35!.ADALAH SAH ENAKMEN SYARIAH YANG BERUNSUR POLYTHIESME CUBA BERTEDUH DIBAWAH NAUNGAN AGAMA ISLAM BERCIRI MONOTHEISME YANG BERTERASKAN IMAN DAN TAUHID PADA ALLAH SAHAJA MANAKALA SYAHADAH ALLAH "THE FIRST PILLAR OF ISLAM "WUJUD DALAM AL QURAN Q3:18;47:19 MANAKALA SELAWAT SERTA SYAFAAT ITU ADALAH SEMUA KEPUNYAAN ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA DAN TIDAK DIKONGSIKAN DENGAN SESIAPAPUN! !!Q64:1;3:19;3:79;2:48;40:18;74:30;Q33:41-42;12:103:12:106!! DECLARATION OF FAITH!~Q3:18.THE PROCLAIMATION OF FAITH(SYAHADAH) THAT IS DECREED BY GOD IS, "THERE IS NO god EXCEPT GOD, IN ARABIC."LA ELLAAHA ELLA ALLAH"(see also 37:35,47:19). THE CORRUPTED "MUSLIMS" INSIST UPON ADDING A SECOND "SYAHADAH" PROCLAIMING THAT MUHAMMAD IS GOD'S MESSENGER.THIS IS BY DEFINITION "SYIRIK"(SHIRK IDOLATRY) AND A FLAGRANT DEFIANCE OF GOD AND HIS MESSENGER(63:1-3;30:35, 72:18-20;18:110)ADDITIONALLY, IT VIOLATES THE MAJOR COMMANDMENTS IN 2:136,2:285;3:84 &4:150-152. PROHIBITING ANY DISTINCTION AMONG GOD'S MESSENGERS"BY PROCLAIMING THAT "MUHAMMAD IS A MESSENGER OF GOD" AND FAILING TO MAKE THE SAME PROCLAIMATION FOR OTHER MESSENGERS SUCH AS ABRAHAM,MOSES,JESUS,SALEH, AND JONAH A DISTINCTION IS COMMITTED AND A MAJOR COMMANDMENT IS VIOLATED". HADIS2 YANG MENDEWA2KAN DAN MEMUJI NABI MUHAMMAD MEMANG BANYAK TERMASUKLAH KALIMAH SYAHADAH KEDUA ,SELAWAT KEPADA NABI MUHAMMAD KERANA MEMUDAHKAN MENDAPAT SYAFAAT NABI MUHAMMAD DI AKHIRAT!DALAMPADA ITU WUJUD KENYATAAN OLEH MASYARAKAT MELAYU MASAKINI BAHAWASANYA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU KEKASIH ALLAH DAN PENGHULU SEGALA NABI. BAGINDA MAKSUM DAN MEMPUNYAI KEISTIMEWAAN MEMPUNYAI PENGARUH SYAFAAT DI HARI KIAMAT AKHIRAT!SEMUA HADIS2 INI TERANG2 BERCANGGAH DENGAN AJARAN AL QURAN YANG MELARANG UMMAH MEMPERSEKUTUKAN TUHAN (WUJUD RAKAN KONGSI)DENGAN SESIAPAPUN ATAU APA2PUN(TAUHID). JUSTERU ITU MELARANG UMMAH MEMUJA DAN MENDEWAKAN PEMIMPIN SERTA MELARANG UMMAH MEMBEZABEZAKAN RASUL2 DAN PARA NABI2 ALLAH DIMANA AL QURAN MENYATAKAN BAHAWA NABI MUHAMMAD ITU MANUSIA BIASA(Q18:110) DAN DENGAN TEGAS TIADA SIAPAPUN MEMPUNYAI KUASA SYAFAAT PADA HARI KIAMAT KECUALI ALLAH!ULASAN SERTA KAJIAN ULAMAK2 IKIM ,JAKIM KEBENARAN BAHAWASANYA SEGALA PUJIAN DAN SELAWAT DALAM PERIBADATAN (AZAN DAN SOLAT)ADALAH UNTUK ALLAH SAHAJA SEMATA MATA!TAUHID BERIMAN KEPADA ALLAH SAHAJA!!(Q20:14;47:19)Q46:36;64:1,12:106,39:45;39:65;72:18-20;3:18 Q63:1-3!!!READ AND REFER QURAN SURAH AL TAKWEER~81:19-24;SURAH AL DUKHAN~44:13-14;RESEARCH Q3:81;33:7;36:3 [ACCORDING TO MAZHAB ULEMA PROPHET MUHAMMAD WANTS THE UMMAH READ SURAH YASSIN OFTEN IS INDEED A WISE DECISION AS A HIDDEN SECRET IS YET TO BE DISCOVERED??]??!!!!BERSAMA2LAH KITA CARI KEBENARAN!