Thanks! Great Explanation. Just one observation: Recursive calls always consume (stack) space, I think if you replace the merge(self, l1, l2) with iterative version, that would be actually constant space.
@jayeshbhoi68442 жыл бұрын
Never seen such crisp and simple approach to solve this problem in any other channel. So addicted to problem solving method. Thanks
@crackfaang2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words and welcome to the channel
@muskanmall4401Ай бұрын
thanks for explaining the logic for the indices to skip, and explaining the code so well!! Appreciate it !
@ajvercueil81117 ай бұрын
Thanks for another great explanation, you always make complex solutions and approaches so easy to understand. Quick heads up, the merge function you defined is recursive, so your space complexity is O(n + m) due to recursive stack frames. The first call to merge does not return until the ends of both l1 and l2 have been reached, so n+m stack frames consume O(n+m) space. To maintain O(1) space complexity, we should iteratively merge the linked lists.
@dnm99318 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for a clear and concise optimal solution. I love how straight to the point you are!
@sharduldave82869 ай бұрын
Thank you for your video, it really helped me understand the problem and the solution for it
@sonicspider493 ай бұрын
Nice video!
@PrenevyspamАй бұрын
Can this be solved using heaps? Is that the expected solution?
@YT.Nikolay2 жыл бұрын
It's probably was my first hard problem I managed to solve myself :) 🥳🥳🥳