Meshtastic Antenna Tuning with a cheap VNA (Vector Network Analyser) NanoVNA V2

  Рет қаралды 6,713

backofficeshow

backofficeshow

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 20
@jester6856
@jester6856 7 ай бұрын
Thanks Andrew, ive got one of these devices, its an older one and ive struggled to work it.... You have just shown me how to use it now. Brilliant 👍
@joostluyten_ON2OT
@joostluyten_ON2OT 11 ай бұрын
Rule of thumb : if the SWR dip shows up on a higher frequency , then the antenna is too short. In this case you had to try lenghten the antenna. But nice to see you gain knowledge 🙂 (ignore my comment, hadn't watched the whole video yet).
@backofficeshow
@backofficeshow 11 ай бұрын
I always appreciate a comment. Thank you for leaving one. I like that you edited it, it's like playing along at home 😄 I'm considering designing an external antenna for this setup. I'm curious as to how to tune it once mounted. I figure I'll cross that bridge when I come to it
@Roskellan
@Roskellan Жыл бұрын
The standing wave ratio (SWR), the ratio of the reflected power in relation to what is going out. If half of what you sent was reflected that would be a SWR of around 6 which is appalling, reflected power of around 10% would be a SWR better than 2 which would be acceptable in most cases. SWR can also be expressed as a Log in dB (as a Return Loss), A Return Loss of 10dB corresponding to an SWR below 2 and a return loss of 3dB correspond to an SWR around 6, or 50% of the power being reflected. Reflections occur when the characteristic impedance of the source device differs from the load (in your case the Aerial). Radio devices tends to have a characteristic impedance of either 50ohm or 75ohm in most cases (not all). Standing waves can blow up your transmitter because 1/ the power that should be going to the load (Aerial) must be absorbed by the source and 2/ that standing wave can produce high voltages at the transmit output when the transistors generating the power are basically current devices not accustomed to high voltages. The Short and Open circuit is used to calibrate your device, these conditions are effective worst case. The Termination is as close as possible a perfect match (should be a dot in the middle of your Smith Chart) and your device will give you a reading for it at good as it is capable. You will not make a measurement for SWR/ Return Loss better than that Termination. The Smith Chart is a little beyond this video but basically represents the impedance of your load showing its real and imaginary components. The real being resistance, and the imaginary relating to capacitance and inductance. Looking at your aerial, then the closer the trace to the center of the graph the better (the marker 1 being the frequency you earmarked with the higher and lower range of frequencies you are scanning represented by the rest of the line), the center of the smith chart representing the characteristic impedance of your source. Just a Radio Amateur guy shouting at the screen :-) A career in SatComs helped as well. The numbers Z=x+jy are J notation which is the Rectangular form to represent a complex impedance. As an Angle and a Magnitude being the other way (Polar form). Looking at, calculation, and manipulating impedance's/ matching using a Smith Chart is by far the easiest way to accomplish, this though when you are learning about Smith Chart's you would be forgiven not to think so 🙂
@Almightyrastus
@Almightyrastus 5 күн бұрын
I have a Lilygo t-beam lora kit on the way and i ordered one of these for just this reason. I did a bit of comms engineering as part of my electrical and electronic engineering degree so some of the other plots and bits do make a little bit of sense. Going to be nice to go back to playing around with the old stuff as it is nothing like i use my actual degree for these days (lightning and surge protection along with HV earthing). Interesting video 😶‍🌫
@nicknackthenoo
@nicknackthenoo 11 ай бұрын
It's not just the SWR, you have to keep an eye on the impedance. Yours was at 28ohms, so matched a bit wrong.
@newm1x
@newm1x Жыл бұрын
It would be nice for you to show the difference between stock and tuned antennas. Range test maybe? Great video!
@backofficeshow
@backofficeshow Жыл бұрын
Alas time is always an issue, however I've gone from zero nodes to two nodes 30 miles away. So definitely an improvement
@tubosolinas
@tubosolinas 7 ай бұрын
Since the (SMA->ipex) feeder plays a role in the setup and the monopole antenna is ground plane dependent,use a SMA->ipex adapter attached to S11 port,plug the feeder there and calibrate the VNA at the SMA end of the feeder.Then attach the antenna there to tune it.For 868 Mhz a 1mm enamel copper wire with 9 turns winded in a 3.5mm drill did the job.Also the distance of the first coil from where the sma ground ends is important and it's 9mm
@iainmcculloch5807
@iainmcculloch5807 Жыл бұрын
Consider updating the firmware on your NanoVNA. There are a bunch of KZbin videos that will show you the process. Then install the PC software. Once you're connected to the PC the software will allow you to capture and compare results.
@catalinalb1722
@catalinalb1722 Жыл бұрын
Hi can you plase share a link for the 3D files ?
@backofficeshow
@backofficeshow Жыл бұрын
www.printables.com/model/731114-heltec-tracker-aka-htit-traker-lora-with-lithium-b
@Aleks-xl5rn
@Aleks-xl5rn 8 ай бұрын
Tuning only the antenna does not make sense, since the feeder has an additional influence. Specifically on the Heltec Lora Tracker board, this short feeder shifts the frequency with the lowest SWR above 900 MHz. Moreover, these distortions in the radio path also depend on the bending of the feeder. When operating at a frequency of 868 MHz, the range of the device did not exceed 500 meters. When I resoldered the board and got rid of the feeder, the communication range in the forest was already 10 km.
@timnicholls6066
@timnicholls6066 Жыл бұрын
Yeah yeah yeah...but will it play DOOM?
@backofficeshow
@backofficeshow Жыл бұрын
Realistically? probably yes 😂
@RAGJAW
@RAGJAW Жыл бұрын
8,6257 cm is the length for 868 MHz.
@backofficeshow
@backofficeshow Жыл бұрын
I think it's supposed to be 863mhz, however that does seem a bit short? Is that quarter wave?
@RAGJAW
@RAGJAW Жыл бұрын
​@@backofficeshowYes that's quarter wave calculated with the speed of light in air. Found the frequency at the Meshtastic homepage. Great video!
@markcparanormal
@markcparanormal 3 ай бұрын
I know that voice.
@mandh14
@mandh14 8 ай бұрын
Embarrassing.
Antennas for Meshtastic LoRa 868MHz SWR and RSSI
25:28
Simon Phillips
Рет қаралды 8 М.
Stop Wasting Your Money, Get A NanoVNA!
16:03
learnelectronics
Рет қаралды 7 М.
小丑教训坏蛋 #小丑 #天使 #shorts
00:49
好人小丑
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Sigma Kid Mistake #funny #sigma
00:17
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Make your own PCB with a sharpie!
32:59
backofficeshow
Рет қаралды 39 М.
Downloading Images From US Military Satellites
26:51
saveitforparts
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
Cool Things That Can Be Done With a NanoVNA
25:35
Captain Radio Adventures
Рет қаралды 31 М.
The ONLY Vector Network Analyzer I Will EVER Need - SV4401A
9:13
NanoVNA a $50-$70 Amateur Radio Antenna Analyzer?
12:57
Ham Radio Crash Course
Рет қаралды 212 М.
How to build your own DIY Dipole 868 Mhz (LORA - Meshtastic)
14:58
Powered Meshtastic Europe
Рет қаралды 19 М.
Three Categories of Communication that Apply to All Radios
16:18
#480 NANOVNA Made Simple
18:39
IMSAI Guy
Рет қаралды 233 М.