could have mentioned in the end that the result is equivalent to pi/sinh(pi)
@SuperSilver316Ай бұрын
I’m glad I didn’t need to scroll far for this one, Hyperbolic trig always
@CM63_FranceАй бұрын
And that is only the value of the function. But the integral of a constant from 0 to 1 is the value of that constant multiplied by the length of the interval : 1 .
@joydeepc1Ай бұрын
You deserve more subs. Although I am below my age i am learning integrals.. one of the best videos on this topic
@jeffreywood4759Ай бұрын
9:20 For those wondering, use the substitution u = (1-t) for the second part of the integral, you swap the bounds of integration, but pick up a minus sign from the derivative, so the minus becomes positive and the bounds swap back to 0 to 1. Then just do the trivial substitution of u -> t, and you'll see the two parts of the integral are the same.
@krisbrandenberger544Ай бұрын
Yes, or you could just use king's Rule.
@ruilopes6638Ай бұрын
Deep Michael Penn lore on this video. Many recalls
@SasseaterАй бұрын
I know right?! Glad to be here 🤓
@karnetikАй бұрын
i see a michael penn integral, i click
@dang-x3n0t1ctАй бұрын
Why not use cosx= Re(e^ix) ?
@xizar0rgАй бұрын
Because that wouldn't show the same techniques he's demonstrating here. It's a pedagogic choice rather than a pragmatic one.
@eiseks3410Ай бұрын
I agree, it was an overkill
@danielc.martinАй бұрын
Better
@SuperSilver316Ай бұрын
Agree
@59de44955ebdАй бұрын
Footnote: the final result can also be expressed as pi * csch(pi), where csch is the hyperbolic cosecant
@xinpingdonohoe3978Ай бұрын
Forget that. That's boring. It's equal to |i!|²
@goodplacetostop2973Ай бұрын
12:55
@jesusthroughmaryАй бұрын
And here I thought I was first
@benardolivier6624Ай бұрын
It was a good place to st... 😉
@IoT_Ай бұрын
Not necessarily, but the answer could have been written as pi/sinh(pi)
@alipourzand6499Ай бұрын
At some point, I was affraid to see a complex result for the integral, but there was a happy end!
@ClaudioCabrera-d4gАй бұрын
Hi Michael, Claudio from Chile
@bassboy14110Ай бұрын
Michael is basically Sean Evans who can do math.
@angelosettanni559Ай бұрын
i can' t understand the final result. can someone help me to understand?
@amritlohia8240Ай бұрын
Which step do you need help with?
@士-x7eАй бұрын
π/Sinh π
@billycheung5114Ай бұрын
Still curious why he can let u be different things of x and add them up to become an integral from 0 to inf 🤔🤔🤔
@BrunoMoreiraTorresАй бұрын
Funny things always seem to happen when you get an integral with bounds at 0, 1 or infinity and applies u=1/x 🤔
How can I send you a similar problem so that you have a try in the channel?
@amritlohia8240Ай бұрын
If you look in the video description, right at the bottom, there's a link to "Suggest a problem".
@wolfmanjacksaidАй бұрын
3:27 not a big fan of setting "u" equal to two different things
@karnetikАй бұрын
u=1/u😵
@noxfortesАй бұрын
Also noticed it. Should've used 'v', maybe.
@lythdАй бұрын
its color coded and with an arrow specifying which is for which integral. once on the inside of integral they are the same thing, an integration variable over the specified bounds. so it doesn't really matter how they related to the previous integration variable. so its not really two different things, it just relates to the previous integration variable differently in each integral, and its very clearly defined which is which
@forcelifeforceАй бұрын
@@lythd Please write in sentences.
@lythdАй бұрын
@@forcelifeforce i did
@celestialmath4797Ай бұрын
Isn't the answer 2π/(e^(-π)-e^(π))
@قاسمشبرنگАй бұрын
In the last step, you forgot to divide by Gamma (1+i+1-i)=gamma(2)=1
@meurdesoifphilippe5405Ай бұрын
I love this world where there is no definition problem in 0
@jardozouille1677Ай бұрын
So complicated ... wouldn't it be interesting to start by noting that ln(x/(2-x)) = 2 argth(x-1) ?