It's funny, having learnt Foucault through a French university education in philosophy, that this Anglosaxon perspective completely omits 'Les mots et les choses', translated as 'The Order of Things' - in France, this is often seen among philosophers as the work that defined Foucault's approach. Read it and you understand the method and, of course, the madness in it, that he employed in his other works. For a documentary of only 40 minutes, I'm left wondering whether it wasn't simply the lure of the gory details that drove the film makers, rather than a desire to reveal the man, of whom such details are an integral part, but only one. And also, I would be of those who think the overarching influence of Nietzsche upon his thought should also be included. But a very enjoyable watch, thanks to the uploader.
@mercuriafilms8 жыл бұрын
+Chris Rob I agree. Also nothing much is mentioned about his work on ethics.
@Heideggerr18 жыл бұрын
+Chris Rob Thanks I am going to read it
@AnaLuizaHella6 жыл бұрын
Exactly. One of his most beautiful and instigating works. But do you really believe that the mind of the America academia who has numerous suspicious "thinkers" idolized can understand "Les Mots er le Choses"? "Ceci n'est pas un pipe. :)
@neik27806 жыл бұрын
Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals certainly influenced him
@DarkAngelEU6 жыл бұрын
This documentary loves to be dramatic. It's just laughable!
@dkm87036 жыл бұрын
1:44 could've sworn that Mr. Bean was interviewing Foucault
@omalone11695 жыл бұрын
Havent you seen the Jordan Peterson interview
@MOHAlesawi2 жыл бұрын
Same
@TristenDurocher6 жыл бұрын
This documentary is why I love KZbin: you can find old gems. I knew they would have something on Foucault.
@KussePikken6663 жыл бұрын
yeah, and they let users steal it all and upload it..great buisness model.Fuck youtube.
@kiritanJ6 жыл бұрын
I love the way this is delivered. Feels ike Old Top Gear.
@Johnconno4 жыл бұрын
Were you a drug-dealer?
@DerekHunterDHChaosRiddler9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for uploading this great doc.
@adamstein410410 жыл бұрын
I think this is the most entertaining documentary I've ever seen. Thank you so much domakesaythink00
@StateLaughter7 жыл бұрын
"The madness of desire, insane murders, the most unreasonable passions - all are wisdom since they are a part of the order of nature. Everything that morality and religion, everything that a clumsy society has stifled in man, revives in the castle of murders. There man is finally attuned to his own nature." --Michael Focault, 'Madness and Civilization'
@johnstewart70256 жыл бұрын
Good quote. I have been attracted by Taoism, for instance, which has an appeal to a natural order. The natural order would include madness of desire, insanity, murder, unreasonable passions, but they depend on circumstances. For instance, a murder would be in response to circumstances, according to the Taoist view. To commit a murder simply for the fun of it, would not be according to nature. Water and how it behaves is usually the image used to teach about the Tao or the Way. Insanity is a special case, however, but it could be compared to cancer. If both these conditions are untreatable, then there isn't much we can do. How long should the family care for the insane person? When do they turn over their responsibility to the state? This calculation what be a practical one, not simply an emotional one, for the Taoist.
@johnstewart70256 жыл бұрын
I like the idea that we are all equal -- the murderers, perverts, the insane etc. This is the Catholic view, although not the common practice.
@johnstewart70254 жыл бұрын
@Carpe Mundo are you saying that the natural order does not include insanity and mental illness?
@owretchedman Жыл бұрын
This quote could easily be attributed to Antonin Artaud
@clarkbowler1575 ай бұрын
Quoting Madness and Civilization like that can say nothing about the thought of Focault. In the book he is channeling historical views on madness. Thus. The quote could be attributed to any period and any people filtered through the mind of Focault.
@nancywysemen71965 жыл бұрын
UMMM,I'll get back to this. Well presented. Thank-you.
@luizvalerio.poetry9 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing this video.
@DxsPro10 жыл бұрын
thanks for the upload
@bigbowlowrong10 жыл бұрын
If one knew nothing of Foucault before watching this documentary, not much would have changed after watching it. This is all breadth and no depth - Foucault's legacy would have been better served if the makers of this documentary perhaps focused on his theories of sexuality, justice or class. Still, I guess this was watchable.
@lautjeclause20693 жыл бұрын
I would personally rather say his later inquiries about genealogy, parrhesia, the hermeneutics of the self etcetera. At least, is it is depth you're looking for.
@Soul-mw8pe3 жыл бұрын
If also takes into account that this doc was made in 1993 by the BBC one could enjoy it a bit more, actually, I found it fascinating in context
@koc50007 жыл бұрын
Finally a documentary on a philosopher which looks not only at the biography, but makes a good effort to bring the ideas as well down to us commoners. Very good.
@wondernexus3d48210 жыл бұрын
A good solid introduction into Foucault's work.
@JeffreySykes10 жыл бұрын
Good introduction to who he was as I begin to read his works. Thanks.
@susanharrison57847 жыл бұрын
I keep watching you vids, nice
@SaturnElena10 жыл бұрын
greatly interesting, thank you
@protestantsfailurend78906 жыл бұрын
Foucault was a man with an innate desire for justice and truth in that, which I can greatly identify with.
@robertanderson39057 жыл бұрын
just love the gate keepers
@sxnico2 жыл бұрын
love the Gabriel Yared music throughout the documentary.
@janllh249 ай бұрын
I remember watching this when it was first broadcast, they don't make them like this anymore
@debyte10 жыл бұрын
Superb documentary. Thank you for posting.
@domakesaythink0010 жыл бұрын
you're welcome. and nice avatar :)
@TimeLords9107 жыл бұрын
debyte hi
@Whydontyougousetherestroom6 жыл бұрын
Fuck yeah captain beefheart
@dominicbarnes32736 жыл бұрын
Fascinating
@javierthomas74148 жыл бұрын
un genio.
@johnjepsen42432 жыл бұрын
Verbiage. Mercy. Amen
@ahnaftahmidarnab67543 жыл бұрын
1:46 didn't know Rowan Atkinson was interested in philosophy.
@neneklampir66643 жыл бұрын
Rowan Atkinson is a Proffessor .
@Cantbuyathrill2 жыл бұрын
17:49 "As a scholar, ........" How ironic!!!!
@MinnesotaEverything6 жыл бұрын
Great mind!!!!
@DerekHunterDHChaosRiddler9 жыл бұрын
Excellent documentary biography on Foucault. For anyone even slightly interested or curious about Foucault, this is a must-see.
@tenajyebba10 жыл бұрын
I have read and absorbed a lot of Foucault. A lot. And I did love this video. Just a few moments of cliche here and there, but so much value is in this please see it.
@michaeldao22493 жыл бұрын
A doc focusing on the personal life of Foucault. In Foucault's eyes: could there possibly be anything less interesting--more loathesome? He would say this is completely missing the point, an approach pandering to temporal, personal details while caring little for ideas.
@geoffpoole483 Жыл бұрын
People don't tend to like child abusers.
@camilopizarroopazo61659 жыл бұрын
AMOR Y PAZ.
@adamf.98352 жыл бұрын
Well done.👍
@reneperez21268 жыл бұрын
Insightful doc, I liked the Ship of fools issue for some reason reminds me of the world partys song Ship of fools
@johnbriggs15728 жыл бұрын
+Rene Perez reminded me of the Grateful Dead song
@jlwaddey95797 жыл бұрын
thanx john!
@jlwaddey95797 жыл бұрын
also reminds one of the Ship of State...
@sherryberry45773 жыл бұрын
It's wild that this dude had such a huge impact on culture and society.
@xander30028 жыл бұрын
strange how the image of Buddha was shown when spoken about the discovering of true self, sort of misleading, as the Buddha actually discovered that there is no true self. Hence, end of struggle, start of liberation.
@dominicbarnes32736 жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Thanks for that!
@tangledude6 жыл бұрын
i thought it was intentional - they were talking about lack of self
@patrickalpha13154 жыл бұрын
That is not entirely true. The true self is the soul (not the mind), which is connected to the supersoul (= God), therefore it is the same as the supersoul, therefore everyone and everything is God --> liberation.
@hasibulislam50053 жыл бұрын
@@patrickalpha1315 How can one's soul be same as the supersoul's? Just because they are connected?
@patrickalpha13153 жыл бұрын
@@hasibulislam5005 Yes, all souls are connected and part of the supersoul, which is god.
@Majnun748 жыл бұрын
I like the idea of rejecting "ist, isms" as history shows them not to be the universal truths they were thought to be.
@Fugu6000 Жыл бұрын
there's a great wolf sound at the beggining... Enjoy :)
@apexxxx109 жыл бұрын
kiitos
@NlHILIST9 жыл бұрын
curiosity killed the cat
@felipemontero98397 жыл бұрын
Does anyone have a pdf of guibert's secrets of a man? I couldn't find it anywhere.
@myAutoGen8 жыл бұрын
Anyone know the name of the music at the end?
@FernandoFaria10 жыл бұрын
Nice film about #foucault 's life, but more of his theories would be nice.
@Kingaxel110 жыл бұрын
Great documentary
@dunsbroccoli25883 жыл бұрын
lol the projections on the bald head
@Greven8664 жыл бұрын
He walked the walk
@hansadhwanisabaprateeksha9 жыл бұрын
Foucault was a great thinker who pushed the boundaries of what is seen as mental illness...and all his experiments with drugs and eroticism etc are very fine when we look at what mental illness is and where it germinates. In fact the work of Stanislav Grof with LSD was exactly on the same lines and that is considered one of the most innovative projects in mental health. How mental health is defined as an outcome of spiritual emergences that can become spiritual emergencies, and how it can be harnessed is what Grof talked about with innumerable evidences of Shamans from the world over. And to those who do not understand about the spirit or mystical world of shamanism or the journey to the underworld, anyone who dares to push the boundaries of inquiry will only appear in-sane. I have my sympathies for those who have not reached that level of comprehension and who have utmost devotion to modern science and its verifiability, irrespective of how ethical it is or how ethically it creates mental illness out of human suffering. In case anyone would like to understand the archaeology of mental illness and how it came to become so, please read Foucault's Madness and Civilization and you will understand how language transforms human experience... of course most social science research thereafter, including my own, is proof of that.
@LionelWitchieWardrob9 жыл бұрын
***** Shuuuuuuuuuuttttttttttttttt up
@edwardmaddocks87869 жыл бұрын
***** A* you've passed!
@jupitersstring28239 жыл бұрын
***** Do yourself a favour and write less pretentiously. Recent scientific literature indicates that florid language doesn't actually make you seem intelligent.
@awhodothey6 жыл бұрын
I agree. Disease is a social construction. They really shouldn't have labeled him as someone who died of AIDS like that. Empiricism does not work.
@user-ge9ft4cu5m10 жыл бұрын
When the video mentions Foucault's last works as focusing on art, to which works specifically is this referring? History of Sexuality? Also, does anyone know the piano piece being played in the video?
@robkirchhof1334 жыл бұрын
I never heard nobody say 'play that Camille Paglia'
@Donatellangelo9 жыл бұрын
Long live Foucault!
@JamesBarrett2310 жыл бұрын
It is a good introductory documentary but it does focus on the more sensational aspects of Foucault's work - ignoring The Archeology of Knowledge, The Order of Things and The Birth of the Clinic. Its time for a new more balanced documentary film of Foucault, or even a film/television series looking at his life and work.
@tenajyebba10 жыл бұрын
They will come. We are just at the beginning.
@dominicbarnes32736 жыл бұрын
I agree - there is a serious lack of good audiovisual content on this philosopher. He deserves better
@RepublicConstitution5 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Also almost no one covers his late acceptance of liberal conceptions of Rights theory if for nothing else than a line of defense against wrongful attacks from power.
@KinoTechUSA693 жыл бұрын
Yeah, its not fair to your pedophile idol to portray him as the filthy degenerate he was.
@moriyokiri32292 жыл бұрын
@@KinoTechUSA69 I found the gun loving psychopath. Go beat off to your guns and anime and leave the adults to discuss philosophy.
@StephenCRose6 жыл бұрын
Reality Ethics AESTHETICS --- seen that way things work.
@ricka17993 жыл бұрын
The disadvantages and myriad inconvenience's of consciousness...
@wishdasher8 жыл бұрын
who is the presenter? is this part of a series?
@MegaPetchi10 жыл бұрын
I agree with you: it is much better to read him :-)
@ROGERWDARCY7 жыл бұрын
I want a deceitfully peaceful quiet life/
@Dagedage902 жыл бұрын
5:53 whats the name of this guy? cant figure it out bcause of the prononciation
@jamesmurphy642610 жыл бұрын
Could someone please direct me to a link or give me a little more information on Herbert Gilbert (?), this man who filmed himself dying of aids? I can't seem to find any information on him on the internet. Thank you to whoever can point me in this direction!
@zabaks1237 жыл бұрын
It's Herve Guibert. 6:29
@marshmelows Жыл бұрын
17>50 That Camille Paglia was somehow suggesting Michel Foucault was the Saul Goodman of Philosophy in that time lol
@RobertKwapich10 жыл бұрын
Is Allain de Botton a narrator here?
@randievietti98965 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to escape solipsism, if the theory is taken fully? Or is that just another construct?
@luisaalvares77987 жыл бұрын
I don't understand how the wall inscription from Mélanie Bastian/Blanche Monnier who has apparently embryo-rounded Foucault's philosophy, is here read in English. This is Poitier in France. Is it a reconstruction for the purpose of televisualisation?
@vicmorrison81283 жыл бұрын
Nutz
@hewholistenstomusic10 жыл бұрын
care to elaborate?
@yp77738yp7773911 ай бұрын
Emperors new clothes. Very impressive individual, managed to fool so many gullible idiots and did it with a smile on his face. 10/10 for style.
@voraciousreader334110 ай бұрын
And then he personified the ultimate human experience of the 20th century by dying of AIDS. So much for male über experience. Did he also enter the “castle of murder” personally?
@MagicFunc8 ай бұрын
I know bait when I see it
@yp77738yp777398 ай бұрын
I have no space in my head for anyone whom publicised and was proud of sexual relations with young Tunisian boys on gravestones. The most vile of creatures, to abuse defenceless young children is the lowest form of humanity and should have been euthanised for the benefit of society.
@focas77710 жыл бұрын
Musique du film Camille Claudel, de 37,2 aussi... - Je ne suis pas fou Ma réalité est différente de la votre... Antonin Artaud a du leur dire mais ils ne l'ont pas cru...
@zandermcconnochie689810 жыл бұрын
29:39 brilliant Rousseau reference
@ordmantell634710 жыл бұрын
This needed more criticism. You can't call him controversial and then give all of 10 seconds to one of his critics (Paglia).
@michaellavin60387 жыл бұрын
Camille Paglia is now exclusively known for not having liked Foucault
@RepublicConstitution5 жыл бұрын
Wow, this comment has aged poorly. Camille is today far better known than the self-abusive maniac Foucault.
@RepublicConstitution5 жыл бұрын
@Left Pantel Greece is a socialist in debt shithole boy.
@omalone11695 жыл бұрын
Nah I know the name as an antifeminist
@RichardMcLamore5 жыл бұрын
@@RepublicConstitution uh. no.
@RepublicConstitution5 жыл бұрын
@@RichardMcLamore uh, yeah commie bitch.
@willcifur Жыл бұрын
All that knowledge and all those honorary titles and the best he can do is echo the intellectual territory of de Sade. He has always struck me as a huckster that would have flourished in todays world. Every time I see the moral decay of feces on the sidewalk and needles in plant beds I think … “behold, the fruit of Foucaults wisdom”
@FrancisE.Dec.Esquire6 жыл бұрын
I used to know a former U.S. Pentagon White House advisor , who in a meeting said:[quote] "In all my years at the Pentagon , we were like a bunch of Ants crawling on a Hollow Log floating doen a River toward a Waterfall...Yet we all Believed we were 'In Control." 12:12. The Performance of Aretau.
@dontbeaslavetothealgorithm5 жыл бұрын
Makes you pine for the days when White House advisors were thoughtful, intellectual, and insightful.
@lonelycubicle7 ай бұрын
Why was Mr. Bean interviewing him at the beginning?
@JAMAICADOCK10 жыл бұрын
Should be more shows like this, giving an overview of great thinkers. Like the arty way its done too - better than dry academics stroking their beards.
@Johnconno7 ай бұрын
Their food filled beards.
@dominicberry55777 жыл бұрын
We have a documentary about a philosopher which has been careful to avoid explaining anything about his actually philosophy. One of Foucault's points was that what we think of as unusual at one time may be completely normal in another. So its irrelevant whether he was gay or used drugs. Another point was that biography teaches us very little about the meaning of an author's work, so a documentary about him being a bit of a bad boy is doubly uninteresting.
@ladazimina18848 жыл бұрын
Folks, please, the name of the piece playing at the beggining....? Anyone :(
@ladazimina18847 жыл бұрын
oh cool haven't notice that, thanks a lot! (:
@hundimzug7 жыл бұрын
lada zimina You are welcome :)
@NythamarDeOliveira10 жыл бұрын
Indeed there remains the challenge of bridging sober readings of Michel Foucault's critical, theoretical insights into subjectivation and social, critical neuroscience beyond facile formulae that succumb to hypes or spontaneous overreactions to a (misperceived) "bullshit documentary" --this is actually a quite interesting, helpful introduction to making sense of MF's mitigated social constructionism, which avoids both positivistic and post-modernist extremes...
@fabriciopontin10 жыл бұрын
que massa, Nita.
@megavide09 жыл бұрын
4:21 "... within them, there is a mirror image of #society..." 26:49 "... 1975 ... America... Death Valley..."
@BettinaAscaino3 жыл бұрын
I see his death, paradoxically, as more “alive” and real than the soap opera scandalised characters unaware of their own madness. Tragic.
@juvercinagomesbarbosaneto72002 жыл бұрын
8
@matthewkopp23915 жыл бұрын
A person need only to realize that in Foucault's era people who were diagnosed insane were routinely lobotomiesed, put in restraints, electroshock treatment. He was not the first or only person to criticize the arbitrary ideas of insanity. Laing pointed out the absurdities as well. A similar absurdity is in his other critique of sexuality, his critique of prisons. Paglia is really contrary because Foucault used a structuralist arguement while she relied on an a priori argument. The fact that she can't see through her own frames makes me cringe hearing her idiotic rant against Foucault. I use a priori arguments mostly but I do not make the conclusion Paglia makes. Foucault is actually especially useful for the highly nuanced cautious universalist because ignorant forms of universalism is a very popular sophistry.
@asianaaq50888 жыл бұрын
was that mr. bean seated across foucault??? :))
@brcx30016 жыл бұрын
Camile Paglia gives no detailed reason for her claims.
@asmoncat50493 жыл бұрын
She is right tho. Foucault engineered his public image and he had no essence and content
@bmarq44025 жыл бұрын
The title along with the use of the term "labyrinth" both being metaphors attaching him to nietzsche, although I'm not sure its accurate to compare the two men. Untimely Meditations is the work that greatly influenced Foucault, yet its not one of Nietzches mature philosophical works such as BGE, GM, T, AC, or EC. Beyond Good and Evil is an extremely ironic title being that Nietzsche absolutely despised socialist, as can be seen multiple times through the book BGE. To Nietzsche, Foucault would fall under the category of the people w/ socialistic sympathies being the fatalism of the weak willed with their inward self-contempt and resentment not compassion as their guiding psychological will.
@teeniebeenie87748 жыл бұрын
paglia is not taken seriously hasnt been for decades.
@jlwaddey95797 жыл бұрын
i sincerely hope thats true. she's just awful!
@omalone11695 жыл бұрын
...and you say that on what authority
@bizarro20daves5 жыл бұрын
I'm a fan of her thoughts. Each to their own
@trainerd14 жыл бұрын
Taken seriously by whom?
@Ravi-xf8dw3 жыл бұрын
Wtf are you talking about? She is great
@richardouvrier3078 Жыл бұрын
Damien’s quartering v Pentonville routines.
@richardouvrier3078 Жыл бұрын
LSD in Death Valley: Huxley’s Doors of Perception; Brave New World.
@Larkinchance Жыл бұрын
How is Foucault different from Genet. (A Thief's Journal)
@geraldvanwilgen Жыл бұрын
Why was Camille Anne Paglia in this? Weird.
@mikesmith-pj7xz6 жыл бұрын
Ironically hilarious to hear Paglia bark about someone being slick and superficial...
@linkqJ4 жыл бұрын
shut the fuck up
@mikesmith-pj7xz4 жыл бұрын
@Carpe Mundo Better to remain silent be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
@mikesmith-pj7xz4 жыл бұрын
@@linkqJ Thanks for sharing. You're appreciated for who you are.
@linkqJ4 жыл бұрын
@@mikesmith-pj7xz got a 150 shooters in atlanta nigga
@mikesmith-pj7xz4 жыл бұрын
@@linkqJ If they're as intelligent and sophisticated as you, make sure they have the safety off, and the mags loaded properly. And remember to wash your hands.
@mohamedehababdelwahabgamal70244 жыл бұрын
9:07 Bookmark
@skstan19658 жыл бұрын
I love how the British pronounce< meeshel Foocho.
@cautivodelsistemah10 жыл бұрын
in Spanish please
@voraciousreader334110 ай бұрын
Well, whatever the controversy he aroused, it seems that Foucault’s personal “human experience” led rather to a personal experience of the “scourge of human existence in the 20th century.” Is it really a scholarly legitimate exercise to experience the antisocial excesses of men (especially) through personal immersion? Or is it excusing impulses to human perversion in oneself?
@ValleyoftheRogue7 ай бұрын
Exactly right. I don't know how anybody these days can defend him. I don't know how anybody ever could defend him, for he was quite open about his beliefs regarding age of consent laws.
@pickleraspa24587 ай бұрын
Nobody has ever defended him. The Greek philosophers are still read and respected and were also users of children. Nobody defends these men because there is no need to do such a thing. Everyone knows it is wrong but there is no group that has not done this horrible thing. If anything, Foucault may have given you important tools to undo the deep held religious ideologies- those things are still the main source of support/hiding place for people who hurt children.
@MrDangatang3 жыл бұрын
Can anyone please lead me to the full video of the theatre of the absurd part. Who is that? And where can I find it?
@cliffpinchon2832 Жыл бұрын
Check your nearest dumpster. 😉
@MrDangatang Жыл бұрын
@@cliffpinchon2832 ok
@gRosh087 жыл бұрын
Explore ...
@LolJayl5 жыл бұрын
Reader, before you watch please understand that you will understand nothing of his works from this film. This is entertainment only. You can see some people below, who could obviously not be said to be doing any real thought, but are entertaining themselves, getting wrapped up in more enjoyment after the movie has ended. Do not be enticed by them. Treat this as you would any mindless indulgence, if you believe in such things.
@Klorrnond10 жыл бұрын
I've never seen any other documentary of a philosopher. You can't expected a 40 min video to capture all his books and articles etc.
@BertramShord2 жыл бұрын
What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets. But enough talk, have at you!
@springchickena16 жыл бұрын
I stand on the brink of humanity. ignorance is bliss. I only wish I was stupid. I only wish I could accept death. I strain against it, grinding my teeth at the sights and sounds of the human condition. fighting it. destroying myself to understand what cannot be understood by human beings. I am god. I am the light. I am the absence of good and evil
@springchickena16 жыл бұрын
yet, all is lost while i travel back, with my message. you are still human. You cannot, you willnot perceive what I do, without your own experience
@chel3SEY10 жыл бұрын
Camille Paglia is totally correct in her criticisms of Foucault. But her criticisms apply equally to her own self-indulgent, half-baked, pseudo-intellectual theories which are designed to shock more than advance knowledge.
@gregtaillon40196 жыл бұрын
chel3SEY they actually don't. She's incredibly factually incorrect about basic things, like claiming Foucault didn't read any of the foundational Greek scholars. He read *many* - he even learned Greek (and German) to be able to read original texts. There's direct Greek content in almost all of his lectures and books.
@kristianj.87985 жыл бұрын
Nothing Paglia has ever said, has been correct (nor properly argued for). Perhaps that the Earth isn't flat, but that's about it. On a side-note: her way of talking is absolutely repulsive; she constantly interrupts _herself_ as if she's struggling to think coherently about whatever she's mouthing on about.