Micro 4.4 Monopolistic Competition

  Рет қаралды 14,092

ReviewEcon

ReviewEcon

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 35
@alimadi9053
@alimadi9053 6 ай бұрын
We are super blessed to have you here on youtube THANKS.
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 6 ай бұрын
You're very welcome! Good luck on your exams! 😄
@gummi3128
@gummi3128 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much:) This video is extremely helpful compared to the other ones I've watched because they always go so fast. You, however, focus on the details and explain everything in depth so its a lot easier to follow along. You literally don't understand how much youve helped me as an online student
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
You're very welcome! Thank you for sharing your experience! Good luck with your studies!
@arranmcentaggart6861
@arranmcentaggart6861 Жыл бұрын
Man, I hope you know that you are in incredible teacher. I'm an Irish Leaving Certificate student and these help my Economics so much! I hope to see your channel continue to grow man. Thank you.
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
Thank you for those kind words! You're very welcome and good luck with your studies!
@Boggesso
@Boggesso 5 ай бұрын
It took me the entire school year to notice your earrings. I really mess with them! Also...thanks for the econ support. Hope to see you again in college:)
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 5 ай бұрын
😄 You're very welcome! Good luck on your exams!
@froggy5851
@froggy5851 Жыл бұрын
I really appreciate the detail of the vids 🙏🙏 You and Clifford are the only things making me pass. Also, could you explain why monopolies don't have excess capacity but firms in monopolistic competition do? Thank youuu
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
On the graph, both refer to producing a quantity on the downward sloping portion of the ATC. For monopolies, their ATC is also the long run ATC due to high barriers to entry and economies of scale are a long run term. For monopolistically competitive firms, the ATC is the short run ATC because there are low barriers to entry. Most monopolistically competitive firms like restaurants, have workers and raw materials going unused. If the firm produced higher quantities of output, they could put those resources to good use and produce more output with those unused resources. That would decrease their average total costs, but monopolistically competitive firms choose not to use their unused resources (thus the term excess capacity) because increasing production would mean they have to lower their price (since they face it downward sloping demand curve) and it would reduce profit if they produce at the minimum of the ATC.
@froggy5851
@froggy5851 Жыл бұрын
Ohhhhh I think I get it now, so monopolies are in the long run and in economies of scale so they don't have as much of unused resources and thus do not have excess capacity, right? Also, is there a difference between underproducing and excess capacity?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
The phrase "under producing" is generally referencing producing less than the allocatively efficient (or socially optimal) output where price (demand) equals marginal cost, well, excess capacity means producing less than the productively efficient quantity where ATC equals MC
@froggy5851
@froggy5851 Жыл бұрын
Oh ok thank you again, and just to make sure, monopolies do NOT have excess capacity right?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
Excess capacity refers to a business being able to produce more with their idle resources, thus lowering average costs. It is certainly possible a monopoly could have excess capacity, but for the purposes of the AP exam, excess capacity is used to describe monopolistically competitive firms producing on the downward sloping ATC while that is called economies of scale for monopolies (for the reasons outlined above).
@MelissaFortune
@MelissaFortune 4 ай бұрын
You are such a godsend thank you so much!!
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 4 ай бұрын
You're very welcome! 😄
@MelissaFortune
@MelissaFortune Ай бұрын
@@ReviewEcon I finally passed it
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Ай бұрын
@MelissaFortune congratulations! 🎊🎉🤘😎
@Jason-o5s
@Jason-o5s Ай бұрын
Cheer~~~relating to a person or business that has exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.😊
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Ай бұрын
Are you asking a question? I'm not sure I understand. But this sounds more like a description of monopoly rather than monopolistic competition.
@cokim-qf2lr
@cokim-qf2lr 9 ай бұрын
I owe you so much!!!
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 9 ай бұрын
Good luck with your exams! 😄
@prithulbaveja4501
@prithulbaveja4501 5 ай бұрын
It's a crime that he didn't have a Hershey's bar in the list of chocolates
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 5 ай бұрын
🚓🚔🚨😅
@exojayy
@exojayy Жыл бұрын
keep it up jacob 👏🏽👏🏽
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon Жыл бұрын
I definitely will!! 😎🤘
@Mouath99
@Mouath99 5 ай бұрын
what is the difference between monopoly graph and monopolistic comp. graph?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 5 ай бұрын
The graphs for typical firms are identical. 😄
@asmamawmulugeta8361
@asmamawmulugeta8361 6 ай бұрын
Why AR,P and D are equal? Please rapidly this answer
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 6 ай бұрын
Price is the maximum amount per unit a firm can sell at. Demand is the highest amount consumers are willing to pay for a particular quantity. P=D because the highest price a firm can sell at equals the highest price consumers are willing to pay. As for AR, that is average revenue. It comes from total revenue which is price times quantity. Average revenue is total revenue/quantity. That means AR will equal the price. Check that math if you'd like. AR will always equal P when TR is PxQ and AR is TR/Q. I hope that helps!
@YingYing-mu3po
@YingYing-mu3po 6 ай бұрын
Hi! Your videos are very helpful but does advertisement only shift the demand curve and not the ATC although it is part of the fixed cost category?
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 6 ай бұрын
Fixed Costs are included in the ATC.if advertising is successful, it will shift both the ATC up and the Demand/MR right. I hope that helps!
@YingYing-mu3po
@YingYing-mu3po 6 ай бұрын
got it, thank you so much!@@ReviewEcon
@hAILeyson
@hAILeyson 9 ай бұрын
Hi, I'm a little confused about the changes in fixed cost. You said it's only going to shift the ATC but is it still the case if the firm advertised? Will the Demand curve also shift upwards in addition to the ATC curve? Thank you!
@ReviewEcon
@ReviewEcon 9 ай бұрын
Great question! It depends. Advertising is a fixed costs and moves the ATC, butt not the MC. If the advertising is successful, it will also shift the demand curve to the right (along with the MR). If the advertising is not, successful, then the demand curve (and MR) wouldn't move. It's even possible for the demand curve (and MR) to shift left if an advertisement campaign causes a backlash (think about what happened with Bud Light). So I'd say it depends on what a particular question is asking on your exam. I hope that helps!
Micro 4.2 - Monopoly
9:48
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Help Me Celebrate! 😍🙏
00:35
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН
Миллионер | 1 - серия
34:31
Million Show
Рет қаралды 2,4 МЛН
Офицер, я всё объясню
01:00
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Monopolistic Competition
11:09
VinsonFMClassroom
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Micro 3.6 The shut down rule!
9:50
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 4 М.
Monopolistic Competition: Short Run and Long Run Profit Maximization
3:58
NotesAcrossSubjects
Рет қаралды 6 М.
Micro: Unit 4.4 -- Monopolistic Inefficiency
7:03
You Will Love Economics
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Micro 3.1 The Production Function
11:19
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 10 М.
Monopolistic Competition
20:31
Jason Welker
Рет қаралды 330 М.
Y2 21) Monopolistic Competition
12:20
EconplusDal
Рет қаралды 345 М.
Micro 2.3 Price Elasticity of Demand
12:01
ReviewEcon
Рет қаралды 7 М.
Help Me Celebrate! 😍🙏
00:35
Alan Chikin Chow
Рет қаралды 69 МЛН