A lot of these devs couldn't care less. They know you will buy. If not you, the next guy with lower expectations will. They should be ashamed. The iconic 707 deserves much better.
@LeTangKichiro4 ай бұрын
Absolutely, and that's why most of the add-ons won't reach an acceptable quality. Because they can earn money without needing to put in any effort. The marker rewards bad work which is why we get bad work. The few devs like the best dev Fenix do it because only a few have strict standards for themselves.
@47guitartom4 ай бұрын
Every time I see ‘Aeroplane Heaven’ I wince. Please, Asobo/Microsoft raise your standards.
@CellBlok69wLamp4 ай бұрын
@@47guitartom at least it's not mscenery or captain sim. But this still doesn't look as good as it should be
@Aviation_Videos4 ай бұрын
@CellBlok69wLamp see people don't read the website for captain sim they say what's in the aircraft but people refuse to read
@ButchNackley4 ай бұрын
@@CellBlok69wLamp Captain Sim built an EXCELLENT C130. It is one of the finest models in the game.
@meroshango96033 ай бұрын
Can i ask what is wrong with this? I see many ppl mentioning but cant understand what is the problem, i dint know much about planes
@ButchNackley3 ай бұрын
@@meroshango9603 mscenery make very low level models. Aeroplane Heaven are mid level models. Kinda like the difference between Aurora and Revell plastic model airplane kits.
@martins.284 ай бұрын
Just another case of "Look How They Massacred My Boy"... Aeroplane Heaven never fails to disappoint...
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
I caught some pretty gross mistakes just by looking at a < 2 min video.
@JRDShamrock4 ай бұрын
@@coriscotupi dont buy it either, Im really not the type to care about the planes looking too realistic or something, but the textures on this one ARE disgusting, its something youd expect from BREDOK
@meroshango96033 ай бұрын
Can i ask what is wrong with this? I see many ppl mentioning but cant understand what is the problem, i dint know much about planes
@coriscotupi3 ай бұрын
@@meroshango9603 Engine shape is all wrong, the air intake diameter is too small compared to the fan shroud outer diameter. Mind you, the JT3D engine shape is a signature of the 707, getting that wrong more or less spoils the visual model. Also, even with flaps extended, there are no Krueger flaps extended on the wings' leading edges. And the little inboard-most (next to the fuselage) flaps seem too large compared to the neighboring inboard flaps. Cockpit side windows (#1 and #5) shapes are wrong, too. All those problems could easily be avoided by careful examination of real airplane photographs before committing to creating a 3D model, an endeavor that certainly demands a great deal of work.
@sadken1014 ай бұрын
please don't pick aeroplane heaven again
@TimAyro4 ай бұрын
AH clearly has the capability. But they need to raise their own standards. All the parts are here. It's just the lack of attention to detail on any one thing kinda sucks.
@MyEmpire914 ай бұрын
Wtf do you mean
@Putzy52144 ай бұрын
@@MyEmpire91 terrible low effort dev.
@LeTangKichiro4 ай бұрын
@@MyEmpire91Why tf can people not just have normal conversations?
@meroshango96033 ай бұрын
Can i ask what is wrong with this? I see many ppl mentioning but cant understand what is the problem, i dint know much about planes
@lvwpy4 ай бұрын
This aircraft deserved to be made by professionals like JustFlight.
@Aviation_Videos4 ай бұрын
Think PMDG would do the better job out of all of them
@Duckssssssss4 ай бұрын
@@Aviation_Videosdoubt that heavily.
@KARLHAB4 ай бұрын
Or pmdg
@rdablock4 ай бұрын
@@Duckssssssssthe DC6 was a masterpiece
@Hybrid330i4 ай бұрын
Aerial Simulations have theirs coming out on their website at some point
@chrishall1974 ай бұрын
This iconic jet needed to be crafted by artists not con artists!
@DirtyRocha4 ай бұрын
Just to let you know in time, the size and shape of the cockpit side windows are wrong. Another parts of the aircraft fuselage, wing fairings and engine shapes are wrong too. You are still in time to correct it and not just sell a mediocre product. If you need help I do have real 707 manuals to aid the developer.
@adilawadilaw82484 ай бұрын
U made one then bro 😂
@SN57ONE4 ай бұрын
Are you a 707 pilot? I don't think you have a say in this bro.
@DirtyRocha4 ай бұрын
@@adilawadilaw8248 it's "You Make one then", illiterate... And I was part of the JF DC-8 Beta team which was Done by AH. Yes I am a developer by contract.
@DirtyRocha4 ай бұрын
@@SN57ONE No but a DC-8 one and yes I know how the 707 operates, so I have all they say in the world. Like it or lump it.
@davidkellymitchell47474 ай бұрын
There was 3 planes that looked similar but different. The Boeing’s 367-80, 707 and 720 with different engine mounts, inboard wing.The 720 had a small tail fin under the fuselage, although many 707s later got a similar fin there, too. The 720 only had two separate cabin air systems, and therefore intakes only above engine #2 and 3. The 707 had three systems and intakes above engine #1, 2 and 3 giving them a strange asymmetric look like something missing on engine #4. Even for aviation nerds, telling apart a Boeing 707 and a 720 is tricky. Your best bet is to look at the pylon on the No 4 engine. Some also used Pratt & Witney and some used Rolls Royce engines. Another difference between the 707 and the 720, was that the latter only had two turbocompressors. A turbocompressor is what Boeing used in these aircraft instead of a bleed-air system, for cabin pressurization. This is because turbojet and early low-bypass turbofan engines didn’t generate enough air volume for a bleed-air system to work without robbing the engine of too much power. There was also dimension differences inside and out of all 3 planes determined by the model.The 707 had three turbocompressors, i.e. one on each engine except engine No 1. To simplify the systems of the 720, Boeing only put one turbocompressor on each of the inboard engines. This system has its own air intake on an extension on the front of the engine’s pylon. In other system differences, the 720 didn’t have an APU!
@SydneyRadio2UE4 ай бұрын
Why is it not belching sooty black turbine exhaust during takeoff? That was the best part, watching these things takeoff and land when I was a kid in the 1960's. Nothing better than being at the end of the runway, in the observation area at McCarran Airport in Las Vegas, and see one of these things heading straight for you during landing, with those bright landing lights and that huge black cloud of turbine exhaust trailing behind. Great memories.
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
Barely 10 seconds of the cockpit, sus
@ThePHLMerc4 ай бұрын
And attitude indicator didnt even work
@specialopssoldier14 ай бұрын
umm you can just go to marketplace and look at it or just wait till youtuber upload a walkaround of the plane..dont be stupid
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
@@specialopssoldier1 well it's aeroplane heaven, l'm not hating on them just going from my experiences with them. The B307 launched without a magnetic compass.... the Titanic even had one. Well let's see. The 707 looks like FS2004
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
@@specialopssoldier1 l'm watching a live stream and the INS is a blurry dummy, looks like it looks like you are looking at an external view cockpit
@bozocraft4 ай бұрын
@@ThePHLMercThese scenes were likely filmed with MSFS’s built in replay mode. I will admit, their replay mode kinda sucks, and typically stuff like attitude indicator positions or throttle lever positions dont save on replay mode, and that’s talking from my own experience. The A330 in the MSFS2024 trailer had similar criticism.
@andrec47314 ай бұрын
No more Aeroplane Heaven !
@andrewmartin87394 ай бұрын
What no smoky engines !
@raymondpalaz53554 ай бұрын
carbon footprint woke idiot made that plane.
@supersky32864 ай бұрын
What is the next Famous Legend ? An Bredock3D plane ? Or MScenery ? 😂
@person_1474 ай бұрын
@@supersky3286 🤣🤣🤣Captain sim🤣🤣
@supersky32864 ай бұрын
@@person_147 ahahahahahaa
@YQRAviation4 ай бұрын
I See A Swiss001 Video Coming..
@Benedettini934 ай бұрын
*grabs popcorn* wanna eat some? It's gonna be a dark laughter lmao
@jaynitrox37833 ай бұрын
She so pretty 🥲 Edit and I love how the devs keeping the “sky is calling” at the end
@PP-GJK4 ай бұрын
I would easily pay double that (30€) for a B707 made by a real Flightsim developer. Lets hope Aerial Simulations takes tzhe flightsim community more seriously.
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
I would honestly pay 60 Euros or more for a study level 707
@person_1474 ай бұрын
@@CAL1MBO same ngl
@FighterJetOfDoom4 ай бұрын
As an aviation enthusiast, the 707 is my favorite aircraft of all time. Glad to see it in game
@garyadams56514 ай бұрын
I bought it on B 707 for XBOX X and I like it! When I was a Kid my Father worked for American Airline, and we took many family vacations on the B707. I have more complex Pay ware aircraft such as the PMDG 737, and B-777, and the Just Flight F-28 . So far I enjoy the B707
@filipesiegrist4 ай бұрын
Hey, are you sure the right version was released in the sim? There is no FMC, Weather radar, neither CIVA INS on it
@gibememoni4 ай бұрын
its for casuals like myself
@SnaxDesAvions4 ай бұрын
@@gibememoni even casuals like you deserve better, the cockpit is visually garbage both on the model/poly and textures. And the sounds are not even JT3 engines but just a generic fan like we had in FSX/FS2004
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
@@gibememonia 707 shouldn't be for casuals imho, it should be respected
@alex-mos4 ай бұрын
If it's aeroplane heaven, I'm not going.
@TheFlightLevel4 ай бұрын
What an embarrassing addition with the lack of quality control. What a scar on the Famous Flyer line-up!
@sk8guitardrums4 ай бұрын
this is my type of jetliner, love it
@bobbysea_26344 ай бұрын
Oh man, thats a poor looking cockpit - such a shame; I was looking forward to this one :(
@marcosbrolio4 ай бұрын
I remember the 707-320 on Varig planes
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
I got to fly in two of them. PP-VLO and PP-VLM.
@person_1474 ай бұрын
@@coriscotupihow was it?
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
@@person_147 As I recall, very comfortable. Real seats, real leg space, actual real meals served in real plates with real forks & knives. And the whole 707 experience. The airplane had that "long distance travel" ambience attached to it that IMO is gone in new airplanes, even if they actually fly farther.
@person_1474 ай бұрын
@@coriscotupi thanks for sharing your experience !
@BartekKujda4 ай бұрын
I was so hoping for a barrel roll shot!
@MicrosoftFlightSimulator4 ай бұрын
Tex Johnston has entered the chat!
@616morgan4 ай бұрын
@@MicrosoftFlightSimulator You guys should look into the Boeing YC-14 it's not famous but it is unique do to the fact its a STOL cargo plane It'll be a great plane to add or to collab with another Third party Developer!
@TANTFCC4 ай бұрын
@@MicrosoftFlightSimulator bro rly got msfs to comment
@captainmo2154 ай бұрын
@@MicrosoftFlightSimulatory'all need to be better. This is embarrassing. You should be embarrassed for publishing this. The 707 deserves so. much. better.
@joemarkowski44654 ай бұрын
@MicrosoftFlightSimulator Please stop contracting to Aeroplane Heaven, they only produce garbage.
@RicCrouch4 ай бұрын
Had the “pleasure” of flying these back in the day. May have to give it a look in MSFS.
@TickleFight944 ай бұрын
Holding back another AH apathetic attempt at recreating a legend until a week after Aviator Edition pre-orders were made available - well played, MS.
@CellBlok69wLamp4 ай бұрын
Keep an eye on that number 4 engine, its running a little bit hot.
@Happy-tp4jd4 ай бұрын
was going to buy it. then seen that its Aeroplane heaven.. and it looks bad
@FLT2474 ай бұрын
In my experience, Aeroplane Heaven has done a good job with their builds. Plus they are willing to do a wide range of piston and turbine aircraft.
@piedmonitor4 ай бұрын
This airplane is a disaster. You need to fire Aeroplane Heaven yesterday.
@EpicJoshua3144 ай бұрын
Pan Am pressed Boeing for the 707 and then the 747 and even the 2707 which didn't come (planned to fly at almost Mach 3 and carry over 250 passengers) but they shaped passenger air travel for decades to come.
@normg22424 ай бұрын
I noticed that the wings are bent upwards even when the plane is parked. And from the exterior it sounds like a small turboprop!
@FlightSimCFI4 ай бұрын
This one is a little rough around the edges to say the least
@Jensen217044 ай бұрын
Is this your pursuit of quality of aircraft models?
@steveneng30264 ай бұрын
I'm loving the music, plus having the plane takeoff from Renton is perfect!
@janusz41564 ай бұрын
The first successful jet in aviation history. 65 years of Boeing 707 in 2022.
@SaxophoneChihuahua4 ай бұрын
aeroplane heaven = garbage
@lvwpy4 ай бұрын
Finally this magnificent aircraft!
@HulkBogan-lq3vk4 ай бұрын
Shame it's a terrible add on.
@lvwpy4 ай бұрын
@@HulkBogan-lq3vk really? I'll have to watch some reviews...
@thefrenchbias22404 ай бұрын
@@lvwpyits bad 😢
@underleft4 ай бұрын
It's terrible
@ceoverona19294 ай бұрын
It's Aeroplane Hell😭
@ambientcoot87154 ай бұрын
I swear I was just thinking last night how cool this would be in the sim!
@MustangBranden4 ай бұрын
Those engines need more of that screech!!! Sound too modern.
@MZZY_Aviation4 ай бұрын
One of my fav planes oat
@Daimo834 ай бұрын
It's an entirely different kind of flying altogether!
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
The 3D model and cockpit lighting/textures look unfinished. Let's hope it's not a shovelware aircraft.
@KAPAFlyer4 ай бұрын
It's Aeroplane Heaven. Of course, it's unfinished. They can't seem to do anything right.
@lachmowe16424 ай бұрын
It's from Aeroplane Heaven, this is the best you can hope for
@global60004 ай бұрын
yeah don't buy it for nice flying, buy it for third person view doing barrel loops for 2 minutes and crash it on the runway and then leave it getting dusty in your virtual hanger, sad times here sadly...
@americanaviation5564 ай бұрын
is this the one thats going to be default in msfs 2024? if so i will hate msfs 2024.
@Andy_M.S.c4 ай бұрын
How does it look unfinished??
@VictorSilva-qf2tu4 ай бұрын
0:45 the artificial horizon is way off
@shinkicker4044 ай бұрын
I wonder if it’s because they film these using their replay tool so it messes the instruments up somewhat.
@m0ther_bra1ned124 ай бұрын
This is the single worst airplane release as pay ware. Ever. For any sim. Stock sounds. Fighter jet flight model. The nose wheel isn't animated. The cockpit is terrible. If I could refund this aircraft, I would and if your considering buying it please don't. Please. Don't let them get away with this. It's bad. There are freeware aircraft that are better. It's clear they don't care about MSFS2020 anymore.
@Burstix4 ай бұрын
I am working on a video as we speak. THIS IS BAD and we can't stand for it.
@mro94664 ай бұрын
_fOr ThE pRicE iT's nOt tHat BaD_ /s
@premium34294 ай бұрын
Lmfao. The dramatic hyperbole bs again. What does this have to do with not caring about the sim? Absolutely zero. Dont like the plane? Dont effin buy it. Simple. Msfs2020 is still supported for years to come.
@mats-c-1334 ай бұрын
Amazing trailer!
@CarlosQuesadaR4 ай бұрын
I like it, looks good to me, mainly knowing it is not a plane I'll fly daily.
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
Should've gone to Specsavers
@robinprivat30242 ай бұрын
Alternative title: "How to convince your community to resort to piracy." There are enough freeware aircraft that deliver significantly better quality. And for a payware addon you can at least expect working animations and decent sounds.
@FLT2474 ай бұрын
Would a Developer please build the Convair CV-580? 184 aircraft were converted from the Convair CV-340 and CV-440, and they are still active freight dogs in British Colombia, Mexico, and serving the Caribbean out of Miami, also still fire bombing in Saskatchewan. Air Chathams (New Zealand) and Nolinor (Quebec) were the last two passenger carriers and just recently retiring them from service in the past couple years. The aircraft has had a long and innovative history, but is often overlooked as the DC-3, DC-6, and Constellation get the spotlight.
@H4NN1BAL4 ай бұрын
0:46 The instrumentation in the cockpit doesn't seem right :D
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
@@H4NN1BAL nothing is right, it's awful
@gibememoni4 ай бұрын
wtf
@reapercountryboy40234 ай бұрын
@@Topofdescent55 Not even awful, it's TRASH. The wings, engines are completely wrong; The whole cockpit including the windows are the wrong size. TRASH
@briancrawley84404 ай бұрын
BOAC livery? First plane I ever flew in.
@FSXNOOB4 ай бұрын
Hmm looks like a bad captain-sim copy, I hope I'm wrong...
@santiblanquez67224 ай бұрын
CS 707 was great back in the day
@Janet_Airlines8024 ай бұрын
Everything isn’t supposed to be study level peeps. Plus it’s 15 bucks.
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
This is Flight Sim 1998 freeware bud
@Mediaright4 ай бұрын
Beautiful soundtrack too!
@Marc-ps9dn4 ай бұрын
Isn't the 707 known as the smoker? I've seen John Travolta's take off and it's smoking like crazy on take off, so where's the smoke?
@nakedcellist4 ай бұрын
It's vaping..
@Burstix4 ай бұрын
They don't have SimFX from @Parallel42 yet
@NemesisVS4 ай бұрын
Knowing how bad engine smoke is implemented in the sim, I prefer to not have it at all
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
Engine smoke halves your frame rate in MSFS. So it's removed from most modules.
@puterboy24 ай бұрын
Now I can recreate TGA Flight 2 from Airport.
@Faye-98964 ай бұрын
Why can't I get past the startup loading screen where it shows the world updates? It just CTDs immediately after
@TheNorwegianPhantom4 ай бұрын
Awsome seeing the 707 in the game. Was wating to fly this legend.
@Aviation_Videos4 ай бұрын
Where is smoke trails
@fergie414 ай бұрын
I hope those commenting here actually bought, downloaded and flown this aeroplane please? If they have and these are the reactions it sounds like Aeroplane Heaven have not delivered. What’s really concerning is the fact that release has been delayed because MS were not happy with the quality !
@captainmo2154 ай бұрын
Bought it. Checked it out. It's somehow WORSE than these comments indicate.
@jameswaters39394 ай бұрын
Oh the repaints are going to be great. Pan Am looks great. I'm sure Eastern, CAL, UAL, et. al. will too.
@geolpilot70364 ай бұрын
I do not think repainters will waste their time on such a broken model. Even AH could not bother to supply some other iconic repaints.
@franciscojavierhermosillov44394 ай бұрын
The very mother of the queen of the skies, the 747.
@DUBaviator4 ай бұрын
Where's the engine smoke?
@susgofres4 ай бұрын
Microsoft has been cooking lately, the a350 and now this.
@AeroPressDispatch4 ай бұрын
No its from iniBuilds
@JacobMarsh74 ай бұрын
Microsoft has never published an A350 for the simulator.
@aviator_kevin4 ай бұрын
except for the fact that none of these are developed by microsoft
@susgofres4 ай бұрын
@@aviator_kevin My fault I was not specific, And now that I see it, the comment doesn't make much sense.
@845SiM4 ай бұрын
Where is the flippin lancaster for heavens sake!
@FLT2474 ай бұрын
I’m buying this!
@CAL1MBO4 ай бұрын
I went MAD when I found out this has a lazy Garmin 430. Why even bother? This just stole the sales potential of an actual good 707.
@garyshepherd36384 ай бұрын
The legend flies again!
@StillSpotting4 ай бұрын
I hope they add the E-6 or E-3 to this. Would be a lot of fun
@Meatwad06664 ай бұрын
now we need a 707 with the f108 engines
@WillemAnema4 ай бұрын
What's missing is the trailing black smoke...
@u2b8914 ай бұрын
That and wing flex
@ImpendingJoker4 ай бұрын
@@u2b891 The wings do flex, they just don't flex very much but the 707 never had extreme amounts of flex in the first place.
@u2b8914 ай бұрын
@@ImpendingJoker I saw a landing video and it did flex, not as much as the 787 but the flex is visible. see the landing at 0:57 the wings remained static.
@GulfCoastTim4 ай бұрын
Wing flex is also dependent on turbulence too.
@YoSoyElPan4 ай бұрын
i love this game
@jenny023924 ай бұрын
Flies great. Love it.
@1994CPK4 ай бұрын
If I buy the aviator edition do I get this included?
@kazzercise4 ай бұрын
looks like it, it's in the picture of included aircraft
@waschmaschinenfreund4 ай бұрын
Yes
@feiocv4 ай бұрын
Great!!!
@dustbowlhammer71194 ай бұрын
Idk, I feel like they are getting better, I mean, sure, they are not expensive Lag machines, but the past two planes work pretty good! Personally I feel like there is not much point paying upwards of 70 bucks for a plane I can barely run due to frame rates, this one, I can fly, and almost everything in the cockpit is clickable.
@meuhey4 ай бұрын
will the 30 payware aircraft included in aviator edition be upgraded to MSFS2024 standard?
@nateweter40124 ай бұрын
Look how they massacred our boy 😢 the 707 deserved so much better representation in sim.
@Hughes24054 ай бұрын
Looks like comic, and will be a toy, 100% sure! Airlplane Heaven never made a good Plane, especially not an airliner. I would appreciate a B707 von TFDI, PMDG, or Fenix.
@Michael-ig8ne4 ай бұрын
Oh I thought it was going to be good. It’s a “famous flyer”
@KarelDonk4 ай бұрын
where is the grumman ag-cat crop duster
@NWA7444 ай бұрын
The soundtrack to this trailer sounds like a John Williams piece.
@dcsescuadron714 ай бұрын
Genial, congratulations
@porter67004 ай бұрын
Old but mighty
@mgsegoo11244 ай бұрын
Im in love with this Boeing 😍
@Aviation-FS4 ай бұрын
yo msfs will you add the dual cockpit later or do you give up on it?
@garyadams56513 ай бұрын
Now if only they would add a additional livery pack. … American Airlines, Continental Airlines, TWA, and Air Force 1, for starters
@LifeSpirit214 ай бұрын
Can’t wait to explore the world 🌎
@Hypersonicbiker4 ай бұрын
Airliners changed forever...
@TamleughPark4 ай бұрын
But I noticed dirt and dust on the wing and engine? Is that a new sim effect??
@johnpooky844 ай бұрын
Why does this iconic plane look like an FSX port in the cockpit?
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
You are being kind. To me, it looks like it came straight from FS98.
@Topofdescent554 ай бұрын
That's offensive to FSX!
@johnpooky844 ай бұрын
@@Topofdescent55 My apologies.
@blackbee_v84 ай бұрын
Beautiful 🥹
@daniellago11914 ай бұрын
Hardly got CTD... Until I bought this one aircraft...
@Great-Documentaries4 ай бұрын
"Microsoft proudly presents." And then shows off an FSX-level modelled aircraft from a third-rate dev. I was REALLY looking forward to the 707 due to my love of classic airliners of the past. Let's just say I won't be buying the Aviator's Edition now. What a *massive fail*, Aeroplane Heaven and Microsoft! ✈🤡😥
@markslandingsandaviationvi31233 ай бұрын
0:58 What airport is that?
@michaelpowell7754 ай бұрын
I love the 707, unfortunately this looks like a bit of a rush job 😞
@Jetset074 ай бұрын
Could've used Captain Sim. Perfect opportunity to redeem themselves.
@kekke20004 ай бұрын
I hope this will come with a retro Orbit Airlines livery. 😍
@keane-pro4 ай бұрын
It does, check the description
@kekke20004 ай бұрын
@@keane-prolol it's right there! 😅 Thanks
@Mark133764 ай бұрын
KC-135 mod when?
@ShortFinal4 ай бұрын
Not even the same plane.
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
Nice. But the fan air intake shape is very odd, with that rounded-off profile (intake internal diameter should not be that much smaller than the fan shroud's maximum outside diameter). Compare it with actual 707 photos & videos, the difference stands out immediately. Which is a shame, those JT3D were a signature in this classic airplane. And... no Krueger flaps? Really?
@Burstix4 ай бұрын
@@coriscotupi Aeroplane Heaven, this is how they do it.
@coriscotupi4 ай бұрын
@@Burstix I was reading about AH in the FS forum, secretly hoping the model wouldn't be as bad as everyone was expecting. But ...ehhh.
@Burstix4 ай бұрын
@@coriscotupi Did you end up getting it? I'm debating right now if I should just purchase it and make a KZbin video to warn people or what. Lol
@filipesiegrist4 ай бұрын
Grande corisco. I bought and it is FSX quality. No working CIVA INS also :(
@Burstix4 ай бұрын
@@filipesiegrist should I make a video to warn others, is it that bad?