Mike Williams on The Healing Home Podcast - The Beatles and Cultural Marxism (July 2024)

In this episode, Mike discusses the role of the Beatles in the creation of culture in the 1960s and why their influence left a lasting impression then and now.
🔗 Michelle’s Healing Home
• Website: www.michelleshealinghome.com
• Patreon: / thehealinghome
• KZbin: tinyurl.com/4nxuj2xa
• Instagram: tinyurl.com/entf96r4
• TikTok: tinyurl.com/2vedmk7j
• Telegram: t.me/michelleshealinghome84
• Facebook: tinyurl.com/566m2wwp
• Newsletter: tinyurl.com/5y9umzct
Please support Sage of Quay™ Radio:
* Sage of Quay Hub Website: www.sageofquay.com/
* Sage of Quay blog: sageofquaydispatch.blogspot.com/
* Mike's music: laboroflovemusic.com/
LEGAL STUFF
Sage of Quay® is a TRADEMARK. All Sage of Quay® Radio Hour shows and interviews are COPYRIGHTED. No portion of this presentation or any Sage of Quay Radio Hour show may be used, reproduced, altered or uploaded in part or whole without the expressed written consent of Mike Williams.
The views and opinions expressed by any guest featured on The Sage of Quay Radio Hour are those of the guest and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the host Mike Williams or of The Sage of Quay Radio Hour as a whole.
All content provided on The Sage of Quay Radio Hour is for informational purposes only. We make no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information discussed or presented during the show or found by following any link mentioned in the broadcast or in the show notes.
Any and all images used in this video or any other Sage of Quay Radio Hour presentation are considered to be in the public domain, free to use, royalty-free material we have licensed or in compliance with the Fair Use Clause contained within the Copyright Act (17 US Code § 107). If by chance this is not the case and you are the rightful owner, please contact us at [e-mail].

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

COMMENT POLICY: Thanks for watching 👍Please keep comments on topic and value-add. Comments, where it is obvious the person did not watch the video, will be deleted. Comments that display inappropriate behavior (such as nastiness, belligerence, stupidity, trolling, etc.) will be removed and the commenter will be permanently banned from the channel. No self-promotion/advertising.

[@michelleshealinghome]

Thank you again for joining me on The Healing Home, Mike! I appreciate you sharing our conversation with your audience and I look forward to a "Part II" in the future, cheers.

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Thank you, Michelle. I had a great time chatting with you.

[@christyliebel9500]

@@michelleshealinghome beware the intellectual dark web, of which Rogan is a founding member. They were put in place in mid 2010’s, along with other social media influencers, to control & steer the narratives. More pied pipers all the same.

[@welcometothepsyop3639]

Mike you are a legend. Anytime I tell people about the PID "theory", after they scoff and laugh I soon point them in two directions. The scads of pictures and Mike Williams. Thank you Mike, you have no idea how much people appreciate you. Staff safe and healthy!

[@jamietingey7498]

Yes, the scoffing and laughter always. Then they want you to prove it in one sentence. Which is impossible.

[@nobbyblob9906]

Thank you, Mike. Remember, biological Paul (pretty Paul) had tiny size 6 feet. The poof of this is in the Northampton shoe museum collection - Beatle boots. Conversely, Billy (not pretty Paul) had medium to large feet. The proof of this is the Abbey Road album cover. Thank you for your wonderful work - we are all in this together!

[@vagabondvibes2578]

He was bare footed on that album cover both to portray a corpse AND to mask his height. Billy is 2-3 inches taller than Paul, and if he had worn shoes it would have been obvious he towered above the above Beatles, when we knew from earlier videos that they were all similar heights.

[@vagabondvibes2578]

Think about Billy's ditty, Shoes!

[@tomvoxx4082]

Thanks Mike & Michelle

[@michelleshealinghome]

@@tomvoxx4082 Thanks for watching!

[@michiganmomma]

Great Interview. Thanks for posting this.

[@geedee123]

Praying for you Mike. Glad to see your posts comming.

[@aprilsky8474]

Great interview. Thank you.

[@deejay7497]

Fabulous chat, thank you.

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@Rockerlady]

Happy 4th, Mr. Williams🎉

[@slow-mo_moonbuggy]

1:23:50 That topic she brought up about "comedy" is a fascinating topic that I've been looking at since about 2019.

[@michaeljones1445]

on a good roll recently Mike

[@vagabondvibes2578]

Sometimes it is not mere innuendo. Listen to Day Tripper. In the same way we have the double tracking of "Cranberry Sauce" and "I buried Paul" in Strawberry Fields, in Day Tripper we have "She's a big teaser" and "She's a *prick* teaser".

[@robgreenawayy]

thanks Mike

[@mrjelly5718]

facts. once you see it, you cant unsee it. all controlled.

[@THECLARENCES]

Wonderful, Mike & Michelle! xoxo The Clarences

[@GuitarMatt]

29:00 "He's a different instrumentalist, a different style than Paul." Proof? Look at the "Let It Be" movie where Billy always has to look at the fretboard in 1969 vs the mid-early '60s where PAUL is looking to the audience instead while playing a million notes a second in front of tens of thousands of fans: m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/d3qnfqSnlMt7brc&pp=ygUeWW91VHViZSBjYW4ndCBidXkgbWUgbG92ZSBsaXZl

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Correct. One of the reasons why Billy looks at the fretboard is because he is 1) not a natural lefty, and 2) he is blind in his right eye (the neck is oriented to the right on a lefty bass).

[@markweller1892]

Fantastic pod cast always fascinating hearing mike

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Glad you enjoyed it

[@crystalcandles7773]

just to say a Massive, Billy's ego sized THANK YOU Mike for all your years of excellent, diligent and important research on this and many other topics. what you have revealed has helped so many on the road. Enjoy your well earned twatvistock free retirement!

[@GuitarMatt]

1:23:41--I like a lot of Joe Rogan's podcast interviews and his time on "News Radio". Yet, the guy is a gatekeeper. Seems like a truther. But he's a FREEMASON! I live in Phoenix, but I lived in Austin for a year in 2006. It's interesting that you have this "pied piper" thing going on with comedians in the state capital of Texas there following him from Kommunistfornia. Incidentally I'm going to listen to an interview his interview with David Lee Roth in the near future. But do I trust the host? Not at all!

[@johnk.4018]

Totally agree Rogan is a gatekeeper.

[@michaelturner5919]

min 31:09. the show must go on. thats also a Queen song, and another very telling way. with the jester

[@kennethlear270]

Awesome interview Mike and Michelle! Spot on in every aspect! Speaking of Marxism, there is a KZbin of a CBS interview from 1968 (labeled as 1969) with George Harrison on the "Ailing of Apple". (Search "George Harrison on Business & The Beatles"). In the very beginning, the backdrop is a silhouette of George's face cropped in the shape of an apple, with bites taken out of it. I'm assuming this was created by CBS' graphics dept.? Something about it caught my eye, and I decided to study it more in depth. If you pause on the picture and turn it upside down, it looks amazingly like a cartoonish silhouette of an old man with a very long beard, wearing a military style cap. He has a long thin neck, and you can even make out his collar. On top of his right shoulder looks like it could be a military bar. To his right looks to be a strange hand holding a sickle. Wondering if this could have been intentionally placed as a subliminal message? Or pareidolia on my part? I tried to post a link to the video, but my comment disappeared immediately.

[@MsRexsmurphy]

@@kennethlear270 incredibly observant friend!! 🤔

[@MsRexsmurphy]

It's on CBC, c*mmie Canada tv. Figures. 🙄

[@IamtheI]

my man .. well done partner...

[@sylviab4178]

Thank you for a fantastic info video !!!! Thanks for putting all this together. The best !!!🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@megbride5645]

Awesome show as always, thank you!! I still can’t get over that you have to remind people to keep comments respectful and on topic , sheesh good lord some people’s kids!

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

We're surrounded by dolts.

[@darrylmoore127]

ppl offended , got from a TV show resident alien " snowflakes". describes those ppl

[@615AL]

Seen a KZbin vid about 10 years ago that showed an elderly business man who was in fact Brian Epstein. This man even had an oil painting of Brian Epstein in his office. They must have taken video down because I can't find it anymore

[@ChangeWeMust]

Right.... 🙄

[@NatalieBransgroveBassist]

I have a feeling Graham Gouldman wrote "If I Needed Someone". The lyrical theme reminds me of "I'm Not In Love" by 10CC. The Hollies released a version and Graham Gouldman wrote a few hits for the Hollies. This documentary is quite interesting: kzbin.info/www/bejne/np2aiKSMaa-Jf6M Graham performing with Ringo kzbin.info/www/bejne/qH-5aWqsaMx1ras

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

An interesting twist is that the Hollies version of If I Needed Someone was released on the same day as Rubber Soul (December 3, 1965). The song was on the Beatles' Rubber Soul album and was allegedly written by Harrison. The question is, how and why did that happen? It appears to me that both the Beatles and the Hollies were given their backing tracks to sing during the same recording period (October/November, both at EMI studios). Although the official narrative would have us believe an acetate of the Beatles' version was handed over to the Hollies, I could not find an entry where George Harrsion personally offered up the song to the band. Why would Harrsion hand his song off to another band so it can be released the very same day as the song appearing on Rubber Soul? I think we're back to the Beatles and Hollies recording the vocal tracks only. Both versions of the song's instrumentals were already recorded. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_I_Needed_Someone and www.beatlesebooks.com/if-i-needed-someone

[@NatalieBransgroveBassist]

I didn't know that that is interesting. I've written a song and before I enter the studio to record it with my band I will happily hand it over for someone else to record as well. Really!?

[@JesseNothing33]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHour Wow, that is a pretty telling and even shocking piece of information. Thanks for all the knowledge and facts.

[@billyshears2032]

Ringos song I’m the greatest is blatant too

[@nicolagianaroli2024]

an additional small clue which simply add up with the other clues about PID. Until 1966 it was John who was occasionally playing keyboards (we can work it out, the night before, I am down) either live or in promotional video. As fas as I know biological Paul has never been recorded playing a keyboard. From 1967 onwards it is Paul (AKA Billy) who is mainly playing keyboards (hey jude, let it be, maxwell silver hammer etc. Only exception is hey bulldog and lady madonna video which I believe have been created after the Beatles split). Also Bill song writing style is much more piano oriented (hey jude, let it be, the long and widing road, martha my dear, lady madonna, golden slumbers).Finally the official narrative states that Paul is not capable neither to read nor to write music. However this ignorance didn't prevent him to compose an oratorio in 1991 or to take the lead of the classical orchestra in the a day in the life video.

[@stevenrufini3515]

I had a thought,could it be that yoko was writing or co writing john lennon's solo work,and that was part of their bond,because I know some will disagree,but she is was a good wordsmith and had musical skill and her father was a trained pianist,also notice how john got good with the piano later and composed on piano a lot,where did he pick that up? Also he relied a lot on phil specter as did george for a shorter period!of course lots of competent session men, so could yoko have been ghost writing,she ended being essentially his manager and had a hold on him,did he need her for that reason,apparently she was very competent in the studio with the recording mixing process and acted like a producer!just a thought!

[@richardrichard9785]

One of Mike's most powerful interviews yet....the correlations and implications were myriad, as were the underlying facts and circumstial evidences. Wow. I caution fellow listeners to note the Rogan connection interjected by the host near the very end. Very disappointing...

[@davidgreene9282]

Hi Mike, so the official narrative has it that the Beatles decided to stop touring in 1966 for a variety of reasons, but nobody I’ve listened to seems to question why their record label would let them make such a major decision on their own … I think it’s safe to assume that this is all a buncha BS and they stopped touring for perhaps reasons we’re currently unaware of… what are your thoughts?

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

There were three phases to the Beatles. Phase 1 = Hamburg with Pete and Stu. Phase 2 = John, Paul, George and Ringo which brought us 'Beatlemania' and consisted of touring and of course their 7 albums (UK releases). Phase 3 = Billy, John, George and Ringo. Phase 3 (according to Memoirs) was intended to be studio based with no touring (think Sgt Pepper). Also, playing live was risky because Billy was taller than Paul (and John and George), and not yet proficient at playing left-handed. Another interesting fact is that after the Beatles released Revolver on August 5, 1966 and went on tour, they did not play one track from the album (the song Paperback Writer was played but it was not included on the album).

[@davidgreene9282]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHour Thanks for your insights Mike! Three phases huh, I wonder what their end goal tho was in not touring? You’d think their label would try and cash in on getting their lads as much exposure as possible… maybe laying low only added to their godlike mystique, I mean, none of the other big acts from that era stopped touring and playing live, seems they were uniquely controlled in that way.

[@vagabondvibes2578]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHourAnd even though some of the Revolver tracks were not particularly conducive to the stage (Tomorrow never knows, Eleanor Rigby, etc.) other songs would have been eminently playable! Not least Taxman, Dr Robert, etc. Even And your bird can sing could have been played (if they could play that complex riff).

[@slow-mo_moonbuggy]

​@@davidgreene9282They couldn't tour because Billy couldn't play left handed bass yet.

[@alholdway2003]

About social engineering; the new bars, restaurants and shops in Detroit are under staffed. Real paper menus cannot be found. Customers have to scan a Q.R. code to download a menu. You have to find your own table. Your drink and food order is by phone application. The bill is paid with by phone. Local long time residents of Detroit don't go to these places. The exterior and set up of these new places in Detroit are designed to exclude locals.

[@KarenMixer]

Beat movement? Jack Kerouac?

[@alholdway2003]

The interview was getting better when the conversation began about Austin TX. How Austin was flooded by people with a different world view from 'somewhere else '. I believe in civil liberties. People can live where they want. 2. Detroit is no longer a middle class blue collar city. The new residents of Detroit are never seen working. They seem to be from Huntington beach or somewhere like that. They have been in university their whole life. These people are over 35 yrs old. They act like hippies but they hate the real original hippies. They smoke GMO marijuana. The lower breathern of this group have privileged positions of martini drink mix masters or coffee shop barista. Their down town restaurants, bars and shops cater only to themselves. Real Detroiters wouldn't consider patronizing these hipster places.

[@neilclark1681]

Considering the agenda was to bring down traditional values, use of free love, drugs etc into society, Paul McCartney (Billy) has himself been portrayed as very moral. - He’s not particularly associated with drugs, except for smoking weed (which I do myself), and he’s presented as a moral “family man”, very faithful to his wives, a good husband and father. - Most people see him as a clean-living, respectable, ethical member of society. -

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Yes, that's the public image (and I don't doubt he loved Linda and loves his children), but he is a member of the Pan/Dionysis (Crowleyism/Luciferianism) cult and a major contributor to the advancement of the one world everything agenda through the music.

[@7arsehle6]

He was a proponent & pusher of the LSD infested Altamont music festival in the late 1960s. Many thought they could fly from taking Acid, and flew out of windows & off rooftops. How many died from listening to their idols by the drug culture liars?

[@katiecat5500]

Beatles mania - a cult

[@user-ny2rk7gj3m]

On board, but why does KZbin let this exist ...?

[@neal-stewart834]

is IHS pagon ?

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Some will say the Jesuit IHS = Isis Horus Set. If so, that would be pagan.

[@neal-stewart834]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHour thank you.

[@user-vh5ge5pu5d]

to be fair tavistocks beatles project has lasted 6 decades but it is about run... younger people aren't that interested in the beatles, your average consumer of their music is 50+ years old... there will be a final chaotic feeding frenzy when billy/faul/paul dies (again)... ringo is fairly irrelevant...

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

The Beatles are the cornerstone of all the genres that followed them. There is an esoteric aspect of the band that is tightly integrated with the worldwide agenda, in particular the one world religion (based on Paulism).

[@vagabondvibes2578]

The Beatles ushered in a whole new era/culture. That was their primary aim.

[@Puffball-ll1ly]

Oh come just because you display masonic symbols doesn't mean they were freemasons. They could been directed by a freemason to do the signs.

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

Or, they could have been Masons which they were. Stop guessing and know: The Beatles and the Occult kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3a7lZx6bd5od6s, The Beatles and Occult Symbolism (In 3 Minutes - Part 2) kzbin.info/www/bejne/a6fKc3yeebN1gbs, The Beatles and Occult Symbolism in 3 Minutes (Part 1) kzbin.info/www/bejne/eYjHfWl7gpeAf7c

[@Puffball-ll1ly]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHour I will watch these as I'm interested but not convinced they were freemasons

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

@Puffball-ll1ly That's because 60 years of conditioning is keeping you from critically thinking. The Beatles were a massive psychological operation and the secrets of the social engineering are kept within the brotherhood. Masons play with Masons. In the song Imagine, Lennon sings about a 'brotherhood of man'. Brotherhood of man is a reference to Masonry (look it up). They were all Masons.

[@vagabondvibes2578]

@@TheSageofQuayRadioHourEven John's first band has an intriguing name. After all, the Quarrymen.......? Aren't those who quarry and dress stones masons........? The Quarrymen, masons, Freemasonry. There are simply TOO MANY such 'coincidences' for all these links to be mere coincidence.

[@Ericthelogos]

Why are you doing a presentation on a book you didnt write? Why don't you interview the actual author?

[@TheSageofQuayRadioHour]

I love when people arrive to the party 8 years too late. Continue to watch the content and your question will be answered multiple times.

[@michaelturner5919]

@@Ericthelogos ppsshh HAA!! that author will NEVER be seen... and nor would i, if he wants to keep his head on his shoulders. he would end up like paul