"As per my research, no one has died ever. We asked 25k people and found out 100% of them are alive"
@genialdragon48433 жыл бұрын
Conclusion: death is subjective
@Fede_uyz3 жыл бұрын
@@genialdragon4843 death is a myth perpetusted by Big Coffin to sell coffins
@mortomes70633 жыл бұрын
In my study, conducted between 9 pm and 3 am, I have concluded we will live in perpetual darkness.
@Hans-gb4mv3 жыл бұрын
But what about those that did not respond?
@venkideshk24133 жыл бұрын
@@mortomes7063 by the way, artic region has a different story to tell.
@RJStockton4 жыл бұрын
"If the plane comes back, and it's got bullet damage. . . then, yeah, good on ya." Literally the words of the Australian Air Force Training Manual.
@snrsctmark14 жыл бұрын
I read the quoted phrase with ozzyman's voice. I had a good laugh at it.
@DirkusTurkess4 жыл бұрын
I believe it says "she'll be right" in the manual.
@stemd25034 жыл бұрын
They have Air force in Australia, why?
@alexthomas66024 жыл бұрын
@@stemd2503 because we still need to fuck people up and our navy and army had too much money
@DeathBean894 жыл бұрын
@@stemd2503 Why does America have an Air Force?
@ferulebezel4 жыл бұрын
They had a similar epiphany in WWI when the hospitals saw more head injuries after they gave the soldiers helmets.
@GrassTalk42024 жыл бұрын
Another good example of how confusing statistics can be, most soldiers who had head injuries before helmets would inevitably perish making the number of “injuries” not actual injuries but deaths. By the time helmets became ubiquitous of course an injury to the head wouldn’t be nearly as severe, chances of survival were much higher. So head injuries rather than death were much more prevalent once helmets were implemented.
@glenmosier86443 жыл бұрын
@@GrassTalk4202 I think that's what the OP was implying.
@boomtaylor82973 жыл бұрын
I think the original comment is good but I didn't fully comprehend so thanks grasstalk4202 for further explaining it lol
@archockencanto16453 жыл бұрын
@@GrassTalk4202 No shit sherlock, that's what he said.
@salender46833 жыл бұрын
@@archockencanto1645 take a chillpill bro
@gareththompson27082 жыл бұрын
This is one of my favorites. I also enjoy the example of steel helmets in WW1. When steel helmets were first introduced in the British army there was a sudden massive spike in head wounds. They figured the helmets must be making the men too confident in exposing their heads, and they were nearly withdrawn from service. Fortunately a competent statistician was able to point out why there was a spike in head wounds. Before the helmets were introduced anyone who was hit in the head by a bit of artillery shrapnel would have been killed. With the helmets they were surviving to be listed as having head wounds.
@tempo53662 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure about the British Army, but in the German Army both was true. People initially thought that the helmet was bulletproof, which made them stick out their head out of the trench and get shot. Same for the plane right? You don’t know if some parts of the plane are just less likely to get hit (for example the nose) or if those planes that get shot don’t come back. In reality it’s usually a combination of these factors.
@taylorminton10562 жыл бұрын
Another massive change in wounds in military history is when units started getting issued field tourniquets. This is about from the 80s onward and particularly in the war on terror, where close explosions like IEDs go off all the time. Severe damage/loss of limb used to result in a lot more death than it does now. Rapidly used tourniquets from every single soldiers' IFAC meant that we were getting a lot more WIA soldiers with a limb gone, where before the massive blood loss from a lost limb usually ends up with a KIA.
@46metube2 жыл бұрын
Oh, the stupid simplicity of it all!
@lawrencedoliveiro91042 жыл бұрын
Related to that is the study of ancient human remains. In cultures that developed agriculture, you see a general deterioration in the physical condition of the skeletons, with an increase in chronic health problems. Whereas among hunter-gatherer societies, the skeletons show individuals with higher average fitness. The obvious conclusion is that the agricultural lifestyle is not good for your health. But in fact, what it means is that those who would have been at a serious, even fatal, physical disadvantage in a hunter-gatherer society were more likely to survive and continue to be productive in an agricultural society.
@46metube2 жыл бұрын
@@lawrencedoliveiro9104 niice summary . Thanks👍🏻
@ragerancher4 жыл бұрын
It's like the parachute joke. "Are your parachutes safe?" "Well nobody has come back complaining they didn't work"
@alexhill43084 жыл бұрын
Laughs in wingsuit
@ladenbin4 жыл бұрын
Actually there are people who survived
@PNolandS4 жыл бұрын
Or like when the British implemented helmets into their army, and their army hospitals saw a significant increase in head injuries.
@eindus72694 жыл бұрын
i remember there was that sas guy
@LuminousLead4 жыл бұрын
If we increased our testing I bet we would see a rise in Coronavirus cases.
@aidanhill55864 жыл бұрын
"Bullets" "Anyone wanna be more specific?" " *ICE* "
@theedwardian4 жыл бұрын
ICE BOOLET?
@Mr_Makina4 жыл бұрын
There's always one in class...
@Jebu9114 жыл бұрын
I mean I guess if he thought it was some high altitude flying where the plane just starts freezing who knows.
@onbored96274 жыл бұрын
@@Jebu911 We found another one.
@alexwhite39594 жыл бұрын
Onbored Everyone, don’t be an ass. They’re wrong about it being ice but it was a fine guess.
@KatarMilak3 жыл бұрын
This bias was also found when helmets were introduced during WW1. Militaries saw a large spike in the number of head injuries after helmets were issued. The initial conclusion was that helmets caused the injuries, but the truth was that those injuries would have been fatalities without the helmets. The exact same thing happened when it became law to have seatbelts built into cars.
@fatipocyte25103 жыл бұрын
JoshuaOziegbe i mean you can you just need the full set of data. You can’t just look at head injuries you need to see head deaths. You can’t just look at car injuries you need to look are car deaths as well.
@nahuelleandroarroyo3 жыл бұрын
When you see a higher Death ratio on british M4s and you find out lads used berets instead of actually protecting stuff
@GenericHandle013 жыл бұрын
@@fatipocyte2510 You should also consider ratio factors for seat belt safety such as the number of drivers, accidents and perhaps even time spent driving.
@bugrilyus3 жыл бұрын
something shout "lindybeige" loudly here
@aradtzin96323 жыл бұрын
@@joshuaoziegbe2227 wait how does this relate to seatbelts
@Geertt2 жыл бұрын
Man I miss being in high school. Presentations like this where the entire class is basically just having a conversation with the teacher with a few laughs in between are truly unforgettable.
@ridwan35332 жыл бұрын
Remember before covid every 1 week my college have 4 presentation in difference class most of us know how to make answer or just trying to make some bluff or fake answer as well Sometime some of my friends ask a silly question that make us laugh
@thesambo222 жыл бұрын
okay
@azaz42162 жыл бұрын
I miss the spitballs and being called f@gg*t, r*t@rd, and pizza face.
@historyZZ2 жыл бұрын
Damn my school was filled with drugs and my teachers were good. I definitely remember a few teachers from my life time. Sucks teachers aren't all made the same
@aliberkozderya31122 жыл бұрын
@@phi_meson the funny thing is that's actually not how Newton's third law works at all. The action/reaction applies to forces, not energy. So even in the case of a gun where the recoil is caused by nothing else but the bullet, the bullet will actually have more energy than the recoil! That's because the same force is applied in both directions but, the bullet experiences the force over a longer distance i.e. approximately the length of the barrel. Work done on a particle is equal to force times distance, and work means the energy that is delivered to the particle. The gun on the other hand moves a smaller distance than the length of the barrel, so even if the force is the same the energy delivered to the gun by the recoil is smaller than the bullets energy. Your teacher did not only get the reality wrong, they also got the theory wrong. They ended up teachin people false physics.
@poorlittlesheep40984 жыл бұрын
I remember my grandpa explaining this to me when I was little. "You're only annoyed by losing one of your socks. Because if you lose a pair, you won't notice you lost them."
@samobee59884 жыл бұрын
Poor Little Sheep I always notice when I’m running low on socks
@UCannotDefeatMyShmeat4 жыл бұрын
until I need a damn pair of socks that are missing
@alangknowles4 жыл бұрын
And if you only buy black socks (no other colour) then you never even lose a pair.
@deadfr0g4 жыл бұрын
Now that’s a sharp grandpa!
@ze_rubenator4 жыл бұрын
I wear odd socks, so honestly I wouldn't ever know if lost only one. In fact I'm pretty sure I have plenty of single ones because I'll throw out single socks when they're worn out.
@joelmarriner4874 жыл бұрын
Similar case with the introduction of helmets. When they got added they saw a spike in head related injuries such as concussion. Was it because soldiers felt more brave and were poking their heads in dangerous places? No. It's because previously, without helmets, soldiers would have died from the same shrapnel and debris that now only causes head injuries. And deaths aren't counted as head injuries.
@Hobbitfeet524 жыл бұрын
Joel Marriner was just about to comment this xD
@kevingooley96284 жыл бұрын
@@Hobbitfeet52 same here. Glad u checked first.
@billcipher7794 жыл бұрын
And soldiers who would have been shot in the head are protected by the helmet, which can slam back and give them a head injury, while still preventing deathz
@peacechan45004 жыл бұрын
We need to remember this bias always, especially in a time of crisis
@hrvojebartulovic78704 жыл бұрын
An interesting question is ' why the parachutists wear the helmets!?'!?!? And the surprising answer is: it's not the parachutists who wear the helmets, it's that the helmets wear parachutists!!! To o prove it, just listen to this true, life story: Two helmets were drinking in a bar. One was shaking and binge drinking. The other one asked: - what's wrong, what's happened? - well, I was jumping with a parachute, as usual, but this time the chute didn't open! I yanked the spare one but it failed, as well!!! -... and? What happened?? - well, luckily, before I jumped, I strapped on a parachutist, just in case! If I hadn't, I would have directly hit the ground!!
@ethribin41882 жыл бұрын
Introducing Helmets to the army significantly increased soldiers in hospitals with head injuries. So much so they missed the part where death from head injuries went down by the same amount non-leathal head injuries went up by.
@deltaxcd2 жыл бұрын
LOL improving healthcare also significantly increases number of sick people
@fabianbandaiii33042 жыл бұрын
HA
@johnpotts83082 жыл бұрын
Funnily enough, this actually came up when I was LARPing. Because Head hits were potentially dangerous (even with padded weapons), the organisers decided that head hits "didn't count" so there was no point aiming a blow there. The effect? Head injuries TRIPLED. Partly because people stopped wearing helmets and partly because people put their heads in the way of blows ("Head parry") to avoid taking weapon damage (yes, they took actual injuries to prevent fake injuries)!
@superstriker4122 жыл бұрын
@@johnpotts8308 honestly I’d probably subconsciously do the same
@addisonvigil1632 жыл бұрын
The helmet bit is fascinating. There was actually a point where the British were discussing taking helmets away because they thought they were dangerous.
@ConstantUNTILisnt2 жыл бұрын
Forget bias, look at this teacher. He took the attention of the whole class by being so informal. Its like he genuinly wants to share something cool with them and not teach them something. Thats how teachers should be. He didnt call anyone by name or make them uncomfortable, force them to share opinions, or even make them stand up when they speak, making them most comfortable to engage in the discussion. Casually asks them to share their views if they have any, and remarks on their response then proceeds to take the lead. So informal yet absolutely effective. I wish I could be a teacher like him.
@musicenjoyer86052 жыл бұрын
He did say their names though. Sharon disagreed with the rest of the class and he said her name
@zornuxzornux87462 жыл бұрын
@@musicenjoyer8605 I think they’re saying that he didn’t call out anyone who didn’t volunteer to participate. If someone didn’t raise their hand or say something, he didn’t go out of his way to call them out or mention them.
@NomadUrpagi2 жыл бұрын
He is still a failure to his Asian parents.
@spacewolfcub2 жыл бұрын
This is how teachers are… Isn’t it? I guess I’m just lucky, then.
@OpRaven-622 жыл бұрын
@@musicenjoyer8605 *Sophie
@Valcuda3 жыл бұрын
This reminds me of a joke a friend once told me: "fun fact, if you ask people who've played Russian rulet if they survived, 100% of them will say yes. Thus, Russian rulet isn't dangerous"
@zedx503 жыл бұрын
roulette* but yes, you're right.
@memesfromdeepspace10753 жыл бұрын
Hold up
@bigtrav26293 жыл бұрын
Good comment and good attempt at spelling that word
@wectyler38173 жыл бұрын
there are no sore losers in russian roulette
@luizpaulovialgoes2523 жыл бұрын
This is the best exemple to survivorship bias I've ever seen! 100X better than the example in the class itself! Thank You!
@facemelter22774 жыл бұрын
Buy a man an plane ticket, he will fly for a day Throw a man from a plane, he will fly for the rest of his life
@nathandamaren20934 жыл бұрын
Technically not wrong, mankind is just poorly built for flying.
@AceDan-gc9po4 жыл бұрын
Nathan DaMaren that’s the joke
@Whatismusic1234 жыл бұрын
What if the plane crashes and the man that got the ticket dies
@Whatismusic1234 жыл бұрын
What if he gets killed on the plane?
@Tailspin804 жыл бұрын
You give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. But you teach a man to fish - saved yourself a fish haven't you?
@fishyc1504 жыл бұрын
When the british introduced steel helmets in WW1 head injuries went UP as a result. But that's because the injury would have been counted as killed before. Same with crash helmets on motorcycles... more people got neck injuries. But those people would also have been counted as killed.
@zorkan1114 жыл бұрын
That's a slightly different problem from the survivorship bias.. It has to do with how you characterize / categorize data points. Practically, death is a subset of injury, and if you treat it like that in your statistics, injuries won't go up. However, if you've got one column named "injuries" and another column named "deaths" with no overlaps, you've got a flawed system and your injury rates will go up if you introduce measures that decrease the likelihood of you dying after suffering an injury.
@Ramsay584 жыл бұрын
When crash helmets were made compulsory in 1973, as well as neck injuries increasing, the rider death rate also increased - perhaps due to broken necks or people increasing their speed due to a false sense of security, but it's hard to be sure as it's said 88% riders already wore a helmet by choice. The same was not true when car seat belts were made compulsory in 1983 and car death rates immediately fell.
@ckmishn36644 жыл бұрын
You refer to this: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3q0dmOrj7qAr9U
@allangibson84944 жыл бұрын
The Germans did issue bullet proof helmets to snipers. All WW1 coal scuttle helmets had the attachment points for the additional armor required.
@nicktombs18764 жыл бұрын
Also soldiers were under the impression that the helmet made their heads safe enough to not have worry so much about snipers.
@urchinsify2 жыл бұрын
To simplify if anyone still lost.. You put armor on where there are no dots. The reason being: The planes who returned and gave this data, obviously survived DESPITE being shot at where the dots are. Those dots means you can get shot at those areas and still survive, planes who got shot at other spots did not survive to give the data.. Hence the bias. The dots represent strong points, empty spots represent weak points.
@vladtheemailer32232 жыл бұрын
Not quite correct. They plane cannot carry enough armor to protect the cockpit and engines. The study was to calculate the survivability of the plane given x amount of damage.
@NickTheNewbie2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's not exactly "strong points" and "weak points", but moreso "places you can survive being shot" vs "places you can't"
@NaraOfCambodia2 жыл бұрын
I don't know a lot about planes but Get shot in engine or cockpit and that plane is going down. The back seat should be for gunner so if the ammo get lit, down you go.
@chriwehl71732 жыл бұрын
Actually mostly correct, but not entirely. The parts that got shot werent strong enough, but non vital. In okd planes used for bombing, the material of the wings was consisting of wood and in some cases even paper, allowing bullets to just rip through and the plane being practically unfazed. Tho, those planes were Doppeldecker planes and FAR from steong enough to carry armor, just about strong enough to carry a single bomb, a pilot and a light machinegun with a single belt of ammunition. So if you got hit in the engine, the pilot or one of the main support beams, you were right on f*cked. But there are pictures of planes being shredded by bullets and savely landing.
@NaraOfCambodia2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, the dots are non-fatal hits. The one without were fatal. They aren't just strong or weak point.
@Vuskenicht4 жыл бұрын
This man’s really tricked me into being in class on my free time. Very interesting, though.
@Heroasteral4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I'm wondering when the next lesson is. Do we have homework now?
@honkmandeluxe4 жыл бұрын
If only our education systems were good enough for every lesson to be enjoyable
@grimble45644 жыл бұрын
The cool thing about the internet is that you can access some of the best teachers in the world while avoiding the worst. If only school systems understood that it's incredibly important to educate people well, and that we're way more likely to care if it's actually fun and interesting.
@VoidFame4 жыл бұрын
Hopefully he made you think outside the box.
@dangerousman40714 жыл бұрын
This should be the standard test for teachers.
@RedSilencer4 жыл бұрын
"Remember this gap in the data? This is a classic thing we see in restaurant reviews!" OH MY GOD THEYRE ALL DEAD
@amentet4 жыл бұрын
xD
@NiramBG4 жыл бұрын
I'm sad I can't give this comment more than one like!
@Chrischn894 жыл бұрын
PUT ARMOR AROUND THE FOOD!
@bl13984 жыл бұрын
Maybe the plates just need to fly higher
@Handlesaredumb694 жыл бұрын
It's like how KZbin only does thumbs up/down. It's either I like it or hate, no in between
@Jakecmuir4 жыл бұрын
The energy of this class. Man. What a great teacher.
@Flubbred4 жыл бұрын
@Straight Razor Daddy Well mathematicians normally don't. People that know math aren't that good at literature or history, and people that know those two aren't that good at math/sciences. So it's actually normal that he does not know history.. same with my professors.
@aseemsharma14274 жыл бұрын
What if the only classes with high energy are the ones you get to see on KZbin.
@bgr2254 жыл бұрын
@@aseemsharma1427 I see what you did there
@victormeas4504 жыл бұрын
Straight Razor Daddy how so?
@bigchum39844 жыл бұрын
Survivorship bias. Classes with low energy don’t make it online to KZbin.
@BradleyG01 Жыл бұрын
You can really tell this guy’s students are engaged and actually enjoy being there. He does an incredible job at what he does.
@AriaHarmony Жыл бұрын
Survivorship bias! You're not hearing from the ones sleeping at the back! Haha just joking, if any of them really are sleeping in the class of the best math teacher ever then they're missing out.
@stevezelaznik58724 жыл бұрын
"The plane is missing cause it got all of its shit torn up." That student deserves extra credit.
@pronounjow4 жыл бұрын
I read this comment just as I heard that.
@Aaron-sl9ov4 жыл бұрын
And this is how you create a great learning environment. You don't chastise someone willing to contribute and you don't dismiss their thoughts because of the way they articulate them. But you do, kindly, remind them of their appropriateness.
@F1fan4eva4 жыл бұрын
Steve Zelaznik why extra credit? Give her the credit that is due, but maybe pull her aside individually after the class to gently remark about the inappropriate language? Or are we at the point in society where we idolize people who swear at the most unnecessary of times just because it sounds "cool" and rebellious?
@Ken.-4 жыл бұрын
@@F1fan4eva Curse words are just made up nonsense. Grow up. Nobody ever got hurt by using them.
@lifeofphyraprun76014 жыл бұрын
f1fanforever I thought that was supposed to be a joke.
@skudzer19854 жыл бұрын
Every school on the planet needs at least 10 teachers like this guy.
@Cheasle24 жыл бұрын
every teacher at my school is like this...
@jonathanallard21284 жыл бұрын
What if a small school has just 5 teachers total?
@KougaJ74 жыл бұрын
Yes now let's clone him or something, because I don't see how it's going to happen otherwise. I'm sorry to break your dreams.
@thecanadiankiwibirb45124 жыл бұрын
Cheesle2 Really? You are super lucky to have such good teachers
@mud24794 жыл бұрын
@@jonathanallard2128 well the op said at least ten... so they would have to hire ten and rotate them or something, or maybe they can have 2 teachers on each class.
@199NickYT4 жыл бұрын
This guy is an EXCELLENT teacher. Engaging, but also being able to guide the conversation exactly where it should go.
@nathandamaren20934 жыл бұрын
Definitely. I would have loved to have had him as my statistics and data managment teacher in grade twelve.
@abechung47384 жыл бұрын
Hahaha he is amazing! I enjoyed his presentation performance. Theatrical, almost. Odd realizing my early childhood teachers were giving amazing body language performance and presentations that were as meaningful and learnful as possible to young learners.
@sethierot70674 жыл бұрын
Haha i wrote the same but in worse xD i agree with your statement.
@Gongolongo4 жыл бұрын
He has coronavirus
@199NickYT4 жыл бұрын
@@Gongolongo source in one hour or you're reported for slander.
@jasonpatterson9821 Жыл бұрын
This is 100% why the "they don't build things like they used to" idea persists. It's only the most strongly constructed buildings/tools/clothing that last long enough to be compared to "modern" items. Nearly all of the old buildings of the world are long gone - poorly constructed from cheap, readily available materials. They did what they needed to do for long enough and then failed.
@TomSFox Жыл бұрын
It’s that and planned obsolescence.
@scottcantdance804 Жыл бұрын
@@TomSFox yeah. Planned obsolescence is why people say "they don't build things like they used to". Sure, there have always been lower quality goods that break down as a flaw in their manufacturing. But until recently, business practice was not to build lower quality goods that break down *as a feature of their manufacturing.*
@damnfreakingsien Жыл бұрын
Well said. Only well made products survive the rest of time. Shoddily made ones are forgotten.
@carl4243 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, in the car world, this idea also presist, toyota is not really reliable and strong as many people associate it today.
@edoardoferretti5493 Жыл бұрын
Or even "the older music is better" way of reason. No, it's just that all the rock punk and metal trash that was largely produced then has now been forgotten
@nivolord3 жыл бұрын
Whenever a celebrity says: "Follow your dreams", think of all the people who did and failed, and didn't get the platform to warn you about the hazards.
@jimihenrik113 жыл бұрын
I know a guy whos dream was to be a successful rapper. He always talked about how following your dreams would make you the happiest person and stuff. But he quit his job and lived all miserably. Some other friends who he used to make music with him kept it as a hobby while continuing to be employed. It always seemed to me they where much happier in life. Also they eventually started making a little money on the side with their music.
@HeavyMetalMouse3 жыл бұрын
While it is true that you miss 100% of the shots you do not take, it still is a good idea to get good at shooting, and set up a viable target, before you go all in. Don't 'follow you dreams'. *Develop your ambitions."
@sigmata03 жыл бұрын
This is a kind of gambler's bias.
@probablypragmatic68933 жыл бұрын
@@HeavyMetalMouse Developing ambitions is a much healthier take on that term, nice one.
@tristanstrain97513 жыл бұрын
But if you live with regrets about never trying, it's not much better.
@bellajaid3 жыл бұрын
"You get shot in any of these places, you don't come back to be a data point." That hit so hard! In my statistics courses and educational survey courses, they hammer it in that every data point in regards to humans are real live people, but none of their warnings hit like that did.
@Testgeraeusch3 жыл бұрын
It also undercuts a large amount of statistical evaluation. "Would you like to take part in an evaluation on gender issues?" "Fock off, mate!" "Ok, not data points for this nice gentlehuman over here..." Also, a lot of the correlation diagrams shown in the appendices of papers look like blobs ob points spread all over from 0 to 100% of whatever correlation there might be. At first i thought it was a scientific joke since the axes were labeled "trustworthiness ratings" and "computed trustworthiness", but it was a somewhat serious paper in friggin nature. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18566-7 The graphics are found on page 5 of the Supplementary Information. What a mess. :/
@dektarey40243 жыл бұрын
I think the bullets hit harder.
@BillyBob-so9xr3 жыл бұрын
Great parallel to what’s going on with this plandemic
@TheNathanchavez963 жыл бұрын
Wanna know a fun fact? Too bad, you don't get a choice. Regulations are written in blood.
@Ben-rz9cf3 жыл бұрын
luckily i took a statistics class in college that really made us think critically about datasets. one of the craziest takeaways that we actually went over is how global warming actually started with the advent of agriculture and it was more than just incidental that the ice age happened to end around that time.
@alexandre-guzu3 жыл бұрын
He's the kind of teacher that encourages you when you get a bad grade.
@Mister_Clipster3 жыл бұрын
"Go, do even worse next time!"
@microz02583 жыл бұрын
@@Mister_Clipster lmao i thought it was worded kinda weird too
@darnit19443 жыл бұрын
@@Mister_Clipster "Encourages you TO get bad grades" "Encourage you when you get bad grades" Lmao
@Stolens873 жыл бұрын
I have that experience with teacher for adults a lot! As a child they often kinda... laughed... at mistakes or put you in front of the class for stupid mistakes so that the other learn that it was wrong. As an adult I feel they are better at motivating. Or maybe it is my "school as a child was a pain the ass experience"-bias.
@christophsteck5313 жыл бұрын
@@Stolens87 yeah that was probably it kids are ussually worse at handling such things than adults (obviously I suppose)
@J4CKAL052 жыл бұрын
Late to this, but his initial and perceived "mistake" of saying this was from the US Army was, in all likelihood, actually correct. Unless the data was aggregated in the post-war period, it would definitely have come from the US Army Air Corps, since the US Air Force didn't exist under this name until 1947. Just thought I'd point that out for anyone curious. Excellent video, Eddie really has such a good way with him as an educator!
@bergmann21282 жыл бұрын
Scrolled too far for this.
@lurkinturk42842 жыл бұрын
The US army also operates more aircraft than the airforce.
@NerdsWithFriends2 жыл бұрын
@@lurkinturk4284 yea I don’t think that’s correct. They definitely don’t fly zero airplanes/helos - but I don’t think they employ more aircraft than the Air Force. I’ll go get to googling though.
@lurkinturk42842 жыл бұрын
@@NerdsWithFriends what were your findings?
@NerdsWithFriends2 жыл бұрын
@@lurkinturk4284 So there is remarkably little information that I could find, but everything I did find suggested the numbers were fairly close as far as number of aircraft, but all data I found had air force with the most aircraft. What would be more telling would be missions flown, or how big their flying hour program is, but I did not find any information on that though. I only spent about 20 minutes looking in to it.
@EpicWolverine3 жыл бұрын
This guys is a great teacher. Also fun fact: KZbin used to have a 5 star rating system for videos but they saw most people only voted 5 stars or 1 star so they just changed it to like or dislike, like the voluntary bias at the end there.
@Adi-do2rq3 жыл бұрын
That's quite smart. Making it binary since those were the only kinds of reviews people would give anyway. So it just gives somewhat more accurate results of what people think. And makes things easier for the user
@XpVersusVista3 жыл бұрын
i miss my 5 star system :( the conclusion that it doesn't make a difference is wrong. the difference is only in the decimals, but even if only every 10th person have a non1-or-5 answer it introduced enough variability to differentiate videos on quality. Ever since the like/dislike switch the quality and general content on KZbin drastically changed, because the data is less accurate.
@viergiesabdapaganini32822 жыл бұрын
And then they removed dislike button
@RGC_animation2 жыл бұрын
Rest in peace dislikes, you will never be forgotten.
@CST19922 жыл бұрын
Now they've changed it again to remove the dislike count from public view so that people don't dislike a video just because others have disliked it in majority. And also: when you dislike something, "you dislike this video" has been changed to "feedback shared with the creator".
@NickBrown793 жыл бұрын
This reminds me how the thing I'm missing is always in the VERY last place I checked...
@Tjalve703 жыл бұрын
Could this be, because once you find it, you stop looking?
@NickBrown793 жыл бұрын
@@Tjalve70 yep, that is the exact point :). Why would you keep looking after you found something. The item will always be found in the last place you look. :)
@NickBrown793 жыл бұрын
@Elias Håkansson Good idea!! :)
@gearloose7033 жыл бұрын
Last place haha... good on you. For me it is statistically also the fist place, the most obvious one, I just don't check thoroughly enough.
@ian13523 жыл бұрын
@JZ's Best Friend Much more often, "I already looked here three times how did I miss it?"
@edboy4844 жыл бұрын
One question survey "Are you alive?" My data suggests that nobody has ever died, therefore survivorship bias cannot be real, since everyone surveyed was in fact alive
@eatenjaguar98544 жыл бұрын
Try doing that right now and I can guarantee you that you'll get at least 20 people claiming they aren't alive
@kyrla4 жыл бұрын
Then that's sampling/population bias since you've only surveyed alive people
@elkien34 жыл бұрын
@@kyrla *hands dead body clipboard and pencil* helo sir plz fill this out
@dpatts4 жыл бұрын
@@kyrla Then so it is with the planes
@TrentRoogna4 жыл бұрын
When you have a response that says “no”, will you throw it out as a lie, or entertain the possibility the responder could be a lich?
@cratecruncher6687 Жыл бұрын
At 0:08 you were right but changed your answer! Aviators were either in the Army Air Corps or the Navy during the war. Bombers were exclusive to the Air Corps. The Air Force was formally created 9/18/47, two years AFTER WWII ended. Congratulations on 1.65M subscribers and an impressive ability to teach difficult subjects.
@joeylantis22 Жыл бұрын
Was looking for this comment!!!
@shortlivedglory3314 Жыл бұрын
Came here to say this lol.
@Aleks24711 Жыл бұрын
It was actually the US Army Air Forces.
@88porpoise Жыл бұрын
Either term would be appropriate, and Air Corps would be the one that is wrong. The US Army Air Corps became the US Army Air Forces in the summer of 1941, before the US was at war. The US Army Air Forces were and are commonly referred to the "Air Force" and as there is a clear continuity from the US Army Air Corps through the US Air Force, it is reasonable to refer to the entire thing as the "Air Force", much like the Continental Army is commonly referred to as the US Army today.
@berges104 Жыл бұрын
Took my comment. figured plenty of people would point out that detail. so close.
@spazzmaticus15424 жыл бұрын
"I was about to say US Army" No you were correct. Air force wasnt around during ww2. The air Corp was the Army.
@theriptide94614 жыл бұрын
Wow here's a cookie for your supreme intellect 🍪
@spazzmaticus15424 жыл бұрын
@@theriptide9461 k
@o11o014 жыл бұрын
Was about to say the same thing. The Air Force formed in 47
@1115devon4 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@ShacoPL4 жыл бұрын
@@theriptide9461 haha you cant give a cookie over the internet, you are so wacky, silly and funny 🤪
@gblawrence0344 жыл бұрын
“If you get shot in any of these places... you don’t come back to be a data point.” Why is this so chilling wtf
@karlheven83284 жыл бұрын
This guy is worrying me he is talking about it as if he was happy about it 😲
@devin192224 жыл бұрын
@@karlheven8328 it's just data you shouldnt get emotional over it otherwise nothing ever gets done about it.
@pendragonchen4 жыл бұрын
@@devin19222 Implying that emotions impede action.
@karlheven83284 жыл бұрын
@@devin19222 Yes, Mr. Datapoint :/
@devin192224 жыл бұрын
@@pendragonchen Think of any position where being neurotic is beneficial. If you are a surgeon would another other emotional state other than neutral be beneficial to a surgery you're performing? If you're a solider and your best friend just got shot in a fire fight if you got angry and charged the guy who shot him, or cried over his death would that be beneficial in the current moment? right now in italy if you know you can only take care 80% of the people there would it be beneficial to think of everyone family and loved ones and get empathetic over it knowing every resource wasted on someone who couldn't be saved cost the life of another who could have? The point being in a critical situation emotional thinking has no place. After the dust has settled and there is no more danger, then you have time to mend the matters of the heart and deal with the emotions that otherwise would have only caused harm in the moments that mattered.
@VictorF03264 жыл бұрын
Survey: Will you fill out this survey? Results: 99% said yes.
@lukemanius4 жыл бұрын
*100
@mrperson13244 жыл бұрын
lukemanius there would be at least a few trolls. 99% seems high honestly
@gwivongalois61694 жыл бұрын
@@mrperson1324 there is even a "law" for that, everything2.com/title/Lizardman's+Constant
@DreDredel34 жыл бұрын
If you ask one person to fill out the survey, and the person agrees, would that mean 100% of those asked said yes?
@XpVersusVista4 жыл бұрын
@@DreDredel3 no, they are not bound to fill out the survey truthfully. if you ask "did you fill out the survey" there are bound to be multiple people who say "no", simply because due to the inherent logic of its clear that they did. they are basically mocking a "only one right answer" question. thus you won't have a 100% yes survey
@landsproduction6702 Жыл бұрын
this man explained data bias better than my own stats teacher
@TheJwwinter Жыл бұрын
Those people whose stats teacher explained it better than him did bother to comment on his video.
@bird37134 жыл бұрын
My uncle shared a post on Facebook that said something like “When I was a kid, we drank water out of the hose, went swimming down at the lake, and stayed out until way past dark, and I survived! Repost if you did too!” Whether or not I agreed with the sentiment of the post, I had to comment “Well, too bad the kids who didn’t survive aren’t here to share their view...”
@sttonep2424 жыл бұрын
Ugh I hate when old folks say that
@americantoastman72964 жыл бұрын
@@sttonep242 Its such a dumb sentiment as well. "Back then we did more dangerous things than people do today. Those times were better. Because of the needless danger." Like a kid who feels cool for smoking but then dies of lung cancer down the line.
@lordgarion5144 жыл бұрын
@@americantoastman7296 The reason it was better is easy to explain. And it's because we *could* do all those things, and much much more. Now if a 6 year old is even allowed outside they have someone right up their ass. No wonder the teens and 20 somethings today are near useless compared to the past. On average, they're horrible to talk to because about all they know is internet and games. And they're even worse to work with because they've almost never exerted themselves for hours straight, and are kinda lazy.
@commonsense91734 жыл бұрын
What a bunch of total wimps in these replies lmfao
@Evercreeper4 жыл бұрын
Robert Pruitt you’re being very stereotypical. Plus, you’re combing losers and gamers under one term so please rephrase your statement. Looking forward with working with you! :)
@paulaswam59094 жыл бұрын
If only all teachers were this conclusive. It's a lot easier to understand a topic when the information is express via its use in real world practical situations.
@YourCrazyDolphin4 жыл бұрын
If we had to show practical applications for things, most of the K-12 curriculum would be eliminated as it would no longer work.
@Ryanrichey134 жыл бұрын
Critical thinking...
@SantaFishes1014 жыл бұрын
@@YourCrazyDolphin so be it! sounds like we have to go the route that a lot of good education systems are...
@underwaterdick4 жыл бұрын
Very true. Just a shame he opened with incorrect information. "I wanted to say Army, but it's obviously the air force". No, it was the Army. The US didn't have a standalone "Air Force" in WW2. It was the USAAF not USAF.
@bruceU4 жыл бұрын
God shut up
@friendgray14 жыл бұрын
I remember when I was in Year 6 and we were learning about WW2- everyone in my class was shocked when they realised that just about everybody’s grandad had been in and survived WW2. It took some people a lot of convincing that the people who died probably didn’t have a chance to have kids!
@sevilnatas54314 жыл бұрын
yeah my great granddad died in the war with no children and somehow i am here?
@Spartan-mv6om4 жыл бұрын
@@sevilnatas5431 Well that's because you, and many others, are an exception. However, a good amount of soldiers were relatively young, and never had the pleasure of having children.
@raezor824 жыл бұрын
@@sevilnatas5431 Mine originally survived, but then I tested the Grandfather Paradox.
@r5t6y7u84 жыл бұрын
Half-true with me. My grandfather signed up for WW1 in 1918, contracted tuberculosis in boot camp, was sent home, got married and had my Mom. But the TB wrecked his health and he was in VA hospitals for weeks at a time. He had a stroke and died at 42.
@WookieChef4 жыл бұрын
True. But WWII was also the time proportionally (and in terms of sheer numbers) that the most people served in the military in some capacity. You just simply had more people serving as soldiers back then too.
@owenmcclelland35732 жыл бұрын
Love this video, one thing to say is that as a history nerd, the us airforce was not its own branch until 1947. During WW2 the closest thing to that was the army airforce. Still awesome video
@jarnold17892 жыл бұрын
Came looking for this comment, nice
@williamneve30482 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing and looked for this comment in case I needed to make it!
@jamo90082 жыл бұрын
Yeah I noticed he incorrected himself lol. Came here to say Army Air Corps
@StuffBudDuz3 жыл бұрын
All surveys are biased toward the type of people who are willing to fill out surveys.
@zuzakurowska86653 жыл бұрын
Actually, fun fact: in my methodology class I learned that there is actually a group of characteristics of people who fill out surveys, since as you've mentioned not everyone does them! And those characteristics get divided into three groups, based on how common they are!
@ascensionblade3 жыл бұрын
@@zuzakurowska8665 really? what are they? or can you tell me some words to search for to learn more, please 😘
@nicholascarr62513 жыл бұрын
@@zuzakurowska8665 Yeah I'm also interested in the three different group types. Could you expand on that?
@zuzakurowska86653 жыл бұрын
@@ascensionblade @Nicholas Carr Okay, so it's going to be a little longer comment! And actually those three categories are divided based on how well-documented they are (sorry for a slight mistake in the first comment, I just checked my notes) So, the first group: - Higher education - Belongs to a higher socio-economical group, people in this group usually have a higher societal status - Higher intelligence level - Higher level of a social approval - Higher level of socialization Next, the second group contains six characteristics that are less-documented: - Higher need for stimulation (especially visible in studies on stress or sleep) - Higher tendency to look for unconventional actions (i.e. sexual ones) - Women tend to be volunteers more often (except the studies on stress, where men are volunteering more often) - Lower level of authoritarian behavior - Volunteers tend to be Jewish rather than protestants, and Protestants rather than Catholics (based on studies from the US) - Lower level of conformity (except women in clinical trials, where it's the opposite) Third group contains characteristics that are documented least often: - Are from smaller cities (especially with questionnaire surveys) - Are more interested in religion (also mostly in questionnaires) - Represent higher level of altruism - Are more self-disclosing - They show lower level of adaptation (when talking about studies on medications, hypnosis or just general medical studies) - Are younger (unless the study is done in laboratory/is more medical, and women take part in it) If you have any questions, or something doesn't sound right (cue obligatory "English isn't first language") let me know!
@prind1423 жыл бұрын
@@zuzakurowska8665 This is why I think surveys would be less bias if they bribed people to fill out surveys, which is kinda wild.
@NicksStuff3 жыл бұрын
Ted talks about "the habits of successful people" do exactly the same, they forget to ask the habits of the people who failed, or they would notice some of them are very similar
@steffeeH3 жыл бұрын
It's true that it's unhealthy to only talk about the habits of successful people and neglect to include the habits of unsuccessful people to give a more full set of data - however assuming those habits would be similar, based on the very same lack of data regarding the habits of unsuccessful people would be just as bad. Are those habits similar? We won't know until we ask those who failed, and so we can't assume they're similar either - we can only say that we don't know yet.
@maxentirunos3 жыл бұрын
There is no better recent example of survivor bias than successful people. Whatever is in industry or arts, they always are interviewed and give advice that they followed but don't get how lucky they got or born into the position they were. But the lie of hard work = success must be uphold so most people don't get the scam
@RSchep23 жыл бұрын
@@maxentirunos hear, hear.
@christopherburgdorff3 жыл бұрын
Do you want to know how to wake up at 5, meditate, journal, spend time with successful people, and ONLY achieve mediocrity? Buy my book for $29.99 and I will tell you!
@Mrtheunnameable3 жыл бұрын
Just stop doing everything the successful people arent doing.
@Ky-Nas4 жыл бұрын
This guy's a good teacher. Look at how he's actively including the students and working the lesson off of their responses. The flexibility of this teaching style is great and more folks should use it.
@m1ner_va4894 жыл бұрын
Bias. We do not see how he is like when the cameras are off. He *seems* like a great teacher tho.
@152JLS4 жыл бұрын
M1NER_ VA The fact that his students are so engaged is a good sign that this teaching style is consistent. Need more teachers like this guy around the world.
@eliakimrodrigues4 жыл бұрын
They could all be acting for this video. He is overly enthusiastic.
@AznUzer4 жыл бұрын
M1NER_ VA I’m pretty sure he records every single lesson
@SS-pq9ci4 жыл бұрын
@@eliakimrodrigues Well they would have be really good and patient actors cuz this guy has a TON of footage.
@johncodeinaire137 Жыл бұрын
This is the best explanation of survivorship bias that I've come across. Both the description from Eddie and the questions and answers from the students helped to make this explanation really striking and clearly understood. Thanks everyone!
@KXSocialChannel3 жыл бұрын
We went to the streets and did a survey to find out how much of the population has agoraphobia. Surprisingly, we didn’t find any.
@VictorKDurand2 жыл бұрын
Wow ok ! This point hits the nail on the head imo. Excellent analogy.
@vive3352 жыл бұрын
SURVIVORSHIP BIAS
@MegaAgamon4 жыл бұрын
Also this is a reason why Cancer rates have skyrocketed in the past few years. We have gotten so good at treating other illnesses and increased both the length and the quality of life, that people get old enough to develop cancer and not die from some other cause.
@swagcandy25764 жыл бұрын
That makes sense, but since the old people who get cancer likely had kids already, passing on their genes, their kids are more likely to get cancer once old. So that cancer is unlikely to be cured by natural selection
@zacharywilliams24 жыл бұрын
Yeah almost everyone is going to get cancer eventually if they live long enough. Its almost inevitable.
@Tjalve704 жыл бұрын
And to add to your point: Vaccines cause cancer. Now you probably think I'm an anti-vaxxer. But I'm not. And what I'm saying is still a fact. Without vaccines, a lot of people don't live to a ripe old age. Because they die from various diseases that we now have vaccines against. With vaccines, they do live to a ripe old age. And so they eventually develop cancer, and they die from cancer. So vaccines cause cancer, because they make people live long enough to develop cancer.
@ppsarrakis4 жыл бұрын
@@Tjalve70 this sounds like a thesis that a trash newspaper is gonna use as a headline then my mother the Karen is gonna tell me "Vaccines cause cancer"
@hk_8024 жыл бұрын
@@Tjalve70 Same with the "Eating ice cream increases the chance of a shark attack." Weather is warm, more people at the beach. Since its hot there, people eat more ice cream. Since there's more people in the water at the beach, there's a higher chance of someone getting bit by a shark. Gotta love the correlation by association, lol.
@brutusvonmanhammer2 жыл бұрын
My favorite example of Survivor Bias has to do with the construction of buildings, in particular very old buildings from long in the past that survive to this day. Historians would study the methods used to construct these buildings and then assume that this was how all buildings were constructed in that particular era. The problem was, they were getting a very stilted representation of how buildings were built because the ones that survived were constructed extremely well with very high quality materials; whereas the vast majority of buildings were poorly constructed using inferior materials, which is why they no longer exist
@glenmatthes8839 Жыл бұрын
People do this with many things when they say "they don't make'm like they used to." Yeah, your grandma's harvest gold fridge from 1962 that's still around is the one that just happened to survive this long while millions of others did not. People really need to learn about survivorship bias.
@Matt-yg8ub Жыл бұрын
Which was perfectly obvious. I hate when people assume that there’s a massive Blindspot in every single industry that has anything even remotely related to a survivorship bias, and therefore everyone must be completely mentally and capable of understanding that the only 2000 year old structures that you see are going to be the well-built ones that survived 2000 years compared to the not well-built ones that didn’t survive 2000 years. Duh!
@brutusvonmanhammer Жыл бұрын
@user-gc5tq7zt7z sheeeeeeesh...touched a nerve with you, brother. You should work out why this triggers hatred in your heart. It is really REALLY is not that big of a deal. Go in peace ✌️
@obsidiansiriusblackheart Жыл бұрын
My fav example of survivor bias are happy trans adults
@nadarith1044 Жыл бұрын
@@obsidiansiriusblackheart There are now studies that point towards sex reassignment not being a perfect treatment for the dysphoria and its symptoms yes, but that doesn't mean that its ineffective if that's what you're suggesting
@gtkng89 Жыл бұрын
When people use the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps", I always think of this explanation. It's easy to see the 1 that achieved it, but you don't see the other 99 that fell by the wayside.
@BenjaminRegen Жыл бұрын
Great point
@seedy80 Жыл бұрын
Or the 98 that never really tried.
@IliterateAshole Жыл бұрын
Another version of the same idea is You can’t pull yourself up by your bootstraps if you don’t have boots.
@Berelore Жыл бұрын
Good thing there's nothing stopping you from failing 99 times and trying again...
@MB-sq7yn Жыл бұрын
@@Berelore If every failure means you don't get to eat for the day, then there very much is something stopping you from failing 99 times.
@OfficialMaxBox4 жыл бұрын
2:25 - When the student leads with "think about it", Eddie gives a great big grin. Must be one of the best phrases for a teacher to hear.
@nemishasharma57374 жыл бұрын
I thought it was a stupid thing to say to your teacher.
@pepperoniboy574 жыл бұрын
didnt expect to find you here
@cadunkus4 жыл бұрын
He's probably here on the same reason we all are: KZbin Recommendations.
@PauaP4 жыл бұрын
I did not expect to see you here tbh...
@23Magistere2 жыл бұрын
@@nemishasharma5737 To me, she's saying it to her class ?
@katyungodly3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of when people say “all the plastic surgery I’ve ever seen looked awful!” Well you don’t notice plastic surgery if it looks good/real, so you’re only seeing and remembering the bad ones 😊
@luuketaylor3 жыл бұрын
In that regard, PS is just like CGI :)
@dydlus3 жыл бұрын
I mean, anything that isn't live footage is CGI, so yeah.
@ZackMathissa3 жыл бұрын
@Some characters aren't allowed I can't think what's real anymore on movies nowadays lmao.
@4f523 жыл бұрын
Plastic surgery is shitty thing to do anyways
@andhieyusuf70083 жыл бұрын
Same as music. There's no such thing as an era where all the music is always good: instead, the best song of a certain era survived longer than the lower quality songs.
@SilencedButNotForgotten4 жыл бұрын
He got the Award for Best Australian teacher 2019 if I remember correctly. Absolutely deserved.
@Mega-P713 жыл бұрын
From this small clip 100%
@RB-mm7ce3 жыл бұрын
how do they check all the teachers in the country ?
@_-_-__-__-_-_3 жыл бұрын
@@RB-mm7ce state/gov email
@illuminate_day3 жыл бұрын
@@RB-mm7ce voluntary bias huh?
@RB-mm7ce3 жыл бұрын
@@illuminate_dayI don't know specifics on their methodology, but it's very unlikely the found the "best" teacher, more like "the most popular, in a good manner", it's obviously still an important and worthy award.
@Simeeow Жыл бұрын
Our dwarves engineers have come up with a new armour design.
@mortache3 жыл бұрын
"Stone age" is also a result of survivorship bias imo. Wooden tools were being used for far longer, but very few wooden tools actually survive
@TheBryanScout3 жыл бұрын
Just like Minecraft
@cristobaljofre2603 жыл бұрын
Now that I think about it, it makes a lot of sense
@Keaze3 жыл бұрын
The whole history is survivorship bias, really.
@isaiahdaniels56433 жыл бұрын
Hmm.. I always assumed that the age was defined by the hardest ore material/ most valuable production.
@mortache3 жыл бұрын
@@isaiahdaniels5643 No, its determined by the most common finds. Like, iron was still available in bronze age, even to ancient Egyptians who took it from meteorites. Mild steel was also available in the Iron age.
@gzer0x4 жыл бұрын
Similar WWII story: there’s a famous book about how “deadly” it was to be in an American Sherman tank. The guy who wrote it was a tank-recovery specialist in the war. That means every single tank he encountered was a dead tank. What really happened was he only encountered tanks that were messed up and assumed every other tank was too. Furthermore: he compared decimated US tanks to disabled Nazi tanks, which is important because when Germans bailed from a tank, the US stopped shooting at it because the Germans were retreating and couldn’t go back to repair it. Germans meanwhile kept shooting dead US tanks so they couldn’t be repaired, because Americans were advancing and could retrieve dead tanks. For years people accepted it as gospel because they were viewing incomplete data
@shawnr7714 жыл бұрын
Also many more German tanks were destroyed by close air support than by tank on tank conflict. Advances in communication technology and tactics allowed ground personel to control air attacks.
@Dragonite_Knight4 жыл бұрын
@@shawnr771 Actually air power wasn't as effective on tanks as we think. Tests by the British showed that it took a fighter craft numerous passes to even hit a tank with an anti-tank rocket. And that was a stationary tank in the middle of an open field. In real combat the tank would evade and put machine gun fire near the fighter to make it worry about dodging. IIRC, according to the Chieftan, that the reason that aircraft is remembered at being effective against tanks is that when they found a tank and couldn't identify what killed it, aircraft was the default to record it as. Of course this doesn't mean that aircraft were useless against tanks. They were much more effective against the softer targets that make up the tank's supply line and a tank without fuel or ammo is useless. Also a tank focused on dodging an air attack isn't focused on enemy tanks or infantry with anti-tank weapons.
@shawnr7714 жыл бұрын
@@Dragonite_Knight Thank you. I stand corrected.
@t1e6x124 жыл бұрын
Yes
@dac57824 жыл бұрын
Get ready for the people trying to defend "Death Traps" as valid, if they do find themselves here
@mud2134 жыл бұрын
My grandfather was actually involved in recording this data during WWII. He was a recent physicist graduate at the time. When he told me this story, he basically gave this same sort of speech and asked me where to put the armor too. It's so cool to see this being used in classrooms :D
@seanmatthewking3 жыл бұрын
My grandad is represented by the space without red dots 😔 Jk jk But he is dead.
@garrettdowd79912 жыл бұрын
This is a chapter from Jordan Ellenburg’s “The Power of Mathematical Thinking” talking about an Austrian mathematician helping the war effort and teaching how math can show us how to approach solving problems. Brilliant stuff.
@reiroll52 жыл бұрын
I love the interest he cultivates in his students. Not only participation, but it shows he creates a safe place for his students when they have the courage to speak up with solitary viewpoints. He also hears and validates student comments mid-lecture. I think that’s great when students feel like they are engaging in true intellectual conversation. It must stick in their heads and further their education far more than a passive seminar.
@myphone-ph4hh2 жыл бұрын
I think this is a tutorial not a lecture.
@weefyeet61772 жыл бұрын
@@myphone-ph4hh it's a lecture
@myphone-ph4hh2 жыл бұрын
@@weefyeet6177 it looks like the type of tutorial i had in Australia when i was studying. Lectures were held in big rooms with about 200 people and tuts were held in small classroom like settings like the one here but fair enough, i dont suppose it natters if it is a tut or a lecture either way
@justmyusername92092 жыл бұрын
@@myphone-ph4hh It's neither. He is a high school teacher. This is a high school class.
@myphone-ph4hh2 жыл бұрын
@@justmyusername9209 thats pretty cool. It is great teaching then. I thought it was a first year uni class 😊
@shannonjones88772 жыл бұрын
I remember once hearing it suggested that bias might actually affect average penis size. Basically, researchers weren't going out and measuring every penis they could get their hands on, but they were instead getting their data on a volunteer basis. So one could argue the males who volunteered to give their measurements were more likely to be on the bigger side because males with smaller penises would more likely be more embarrassed about participating. And then this becomes crazier when considering that the average being artificially inflated like this increases the likelihood of males being unconfident about their penis size. So yeah, there's a good chance that the average penis size is actually smaller than what's on record.
@Seeyeay2 жыл бұрын
Thanks bro, i needed this 🥲
@austinfontes39062 жыл бұрын
I'm gunna start calling myself only slightly below average then 😎
@Just_a_happy_lil_guy2 жыл бұрын
@@austinfontes3906 💀💀💀
@rodrigorebollos2 жыл бұрын
The winds of change are blowin'~ There's excitement!...in the air~ Can you feel it? It's electrical and magical~ The happy train's on track~ Because America is.... Back!
@mesotolioma50892 жыл бұрын
:')
@ChristoKiwi2 жыл бұрын
I wish my teachers were this good back in school. Real world examples, interesting presentation and uplifting energy! GIVE THIS MAN A PAY RISE
@imaverageatgamesbutimostly34312 жыл бұрын
That’s unfair to your past teachers because this topic is much more interesting than what you typically learn in school, and you’ve only had to pay attention for 6 minutes as opposed to a full day of school.
@MrJuliankilla2 жыл бұрын
@@imaverageatgamesbutimostly3431 yeah I would say he has a very biased opinion
@roy21952 жыл бұрын
Ur comment is literally survivorship biased because the non-interesting parts of the lesson didn't make it into the youtube video
@robbierootbeer80562 жыл бұрын
He reminds me of our history teacher who actually funnily enough taught us this exact story!
@NovaRanger007 Жыл бұрын
Wow, that's an interesting thing I learnt today, got sent here from out of a dwarven armor design.
@Liwet.4 жыл бұрын
Another example can be found in World War 1. Soldiers were given bullet proof helmets and the amount of head injuries drastically increased! Do you know why? . . . What also happened is the amount of deaths from head injuries decreased. Soldiers that would have died from head injuries ended up coming back with head wounds instead.
@rosso41224 жыл бұрын
They were NOT bulletproof, they were splinter/fragmentation proof to protect from falling shrapnell and debre that was shot up into the air from HE-Shell explosions and such.
@tyler895574 жыл бұрын
Because instead of dying instantly they got an injury and had a chance at living perhaps?
@geocarey4 жыл бұрын
Also... perhaps the helmet made them feel protected so they stuck their head up more often? I once read that the way to stop ALL traffic accidents immediately would be to ban seat belts and have an 8 inch sharp spike in the centre of every steering wheel.
@tyler895574 жыл бұрын
You severely underestimate the power of stupid. There were car accidents long before safety regulations for cars kicked in.
@garypeterson36284 жыл бұрын
It has to do with how statistics were kept. If you died from a head wound without a helmet you were just listed as "Dead" If you survived a head injury because you had your helmet on it was listed as "Head injury" If you put your helmet between your head and a bullet you were listed as "Stupid"
@AGreySky4 жыл бұрын
the toupée falacy is related. "I've never seen a good toupée" Well, ya wouldn't realise a good toupée was, in fact, a toupée.
@benjiposey54534 жыл бұрын
Ah, same goes for ninjas
@michaelharrington66984 жыл бұрын
Reminds me when I told a teacher my older brother was sneaky. She said, "I didn't think he was sneaky" ...
@lucagerza73724 жыл бұрын
Same goes for cgi in movies
@bunyip424 жыл бұрын
I'll just add "Camouflage Artist, US Air Force Dirigible Corps" to my resume. Then, when the interviewer says, "Are you sure? I've never seen a USAF Dirigible"... 😎🤣
@PhantomAyz3 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the thought that the smartest criminals never got caught
@sirbaguette83784 жыл бұрын
Reminds me of the helmet riddle: In a war, there were reports that too many people became injured and died due to damage to the head. So they designed a much stronger and lightweight helmet. However this only caused more soldiers to be reported injured in the battlefield. How so? Answer: more people injured because the helmet prevented them from dying, only injuring them
@VhenRaTheRaptor4 жыл бұрын
There is an interesting point similar to that. Did you know British Shermans had a higher crew loss rate when knocked out then American Shermans, despite identical tanks? But a lower crew injury rate? American tank crews wore helmets. Brits wore berets.
@CSelH4 жыл бұрын
@@VhenRaTheRaptor if Nicholas Moran taught us anything, it's that you really want a helmet when you're about to experience a significant emotional event.
@Observer314 жыл бұрын
fragments and shrapnel. You get a small piece of shrapnel in the arm, it hurts and you may be out of the fight, but you can survive. Get one in the head.... the first body armor (flack jackets) were also meant to protect the body from these small fragments.
@loicvanderwielen4 жыл бұрын
It's from the introduction of the British WW1 brodie helmet.
@Moose1207 Жыл бұрын
I took 5 years of schooling to do industrial HVAC. If I had a teacher that was this engaging, this enthusiastic about the material I'm sure I would have enjoyed it more, and retained more knowledge. This is excellent instructor skills !
@kukalakana3 жыл бұрын
I noticed that "volunteer bias" before I ever knew there was a name for it. Chuck out a random question on social media like "How many people here are left-handed", and you would think the number approaches 50% when really we lefties are the ones who are more likely to answer a question like that.
@DeathnoteBB3 жыл бұрын
I mean yeah cause the question is literally aimed at left-handed folk. If you’re right-handed you wouldn’t pipe up to just go “I’m not!”
@goldeer71292 жыл бұрын
It' also extremely important here to say that they are NOT 50% of lefties but like 10~20%. If you only ask lefties to say they are, it's gonna be extremely biased since only a few right-handed will manifest. But, even if you ask "what is your dominant hand", left-handed people will answer more than actual average of left-handed people. Or, if you think the answer is obvious, that you're part of the majority of people, you may not answer. But if you are (or think you are) part of a minority of peope you probably will answer to be heard. This is one of the reasons taking surveys out of context can be dangerous and non-representative.
@dELTA135791113152 жыл бұрын
@@DeathnoteBB I wouldn't either
@carultch2 жыл бұрын
@@DeathnoteBB That's exactly the OP's point. You get a sampling bias when the question is systematically of interest to the left-handed participants, that most of the right-handed people don't become part of your data.
@ariannasv222 жыл бұрын
That's why I don't really like KZbinr polls when they ask like "what games do you want me to play?" And the KZbinr mostly plays only one kind of game.
@abanjoplayer4 жыл бұрын
Keeping students engaged is, in my opinion, the biggest thing you can do to aid their learning. Great stuff
@oz_jones4 жыл бұрын
O captain, my captain
@Aeroxima4 жыл бұрын
@Autismo Yeah, that illicit school should be raided, the teachers fired (or better shot), and political propaganda spread thoroughly to keep people properly controlled.
@Kay_Dabbles Жыл бұрын
Anybody else watch this due to a clip about new dwarven armor design? In any case, no regrets about finding this gem.
@WelfareChrist2 жыл бұрын
Taking classes on bias and heuristics should really be required, their such a fundamental facet of our day to day cognition it’d be great if we all started trying to account for them more often.
@The88Cheat2 жыл бұрын
Also on statistics and probability. So many people are unable to understand how likely events are to happen.
@kwadwolarbi10332 жыл бұрын
@@The88Cheat this would also prevent lots of hindsight biases
@lawrencedoliveiro91042 жыл бұрын
People tend to have very bad intuitions on probability. For example, the base-rate fallacy: if a test for some kind of cancer is so effective at saving lives, why not test everybody, not just the at-risk group? If DNA and fingerprint identification is so useful for solving crimes, why not record everybody’s DNA and fingerprints?
@ImAlsoMerobiba2 жыл бұрын
@@The88Cheat people would then complain about having to learn useless math, like they already do. A lot of people don't realize how often they use skills and knowledge from those classes that they deemed useless. But that's also on the educational system. It should also better framed as how are these topics applicable to real life.
@alexanderSydneyOz Жыл бұрын
It could be dangerous if too many people were schooled in these sorts of matters. Where would that leave social media? Given its GDP value, a recession could result.
@TAK-yj4hj4 жыл бұрын
To summarize the comments You have the ones that say: ”I wish I had him as a teacher.” And then the ones that say: ”You were correct the first time. The US Air Force didn't exist in WW2”
@stewiegrif14 жыл бұрын
It's possible we can relate the discussion of bias to this comment section. If a lot of comments are related to his correct/incorrect retelling of history, does that say something about how people who like history react to potential falsifications? It's a compelling way to look at data. I would argue that comments on the internet are under constant competition due to the value and reward systems that the original creators of the systems put in place.
@CCSABCD4 жыл бұрын
There's always the "muh army" murican
@lordgarion5144 жыл бұрын
Except they aren't exactly right either. It went from the "United States army air service" to the "United States army air Force" in 1941. It also stopped being completely controlled by the army at that time.
@kendog84bsc4 жыл бұрын
I wrote the second comment. I was scrolling down the comment section, and found your comment. Then there was my comment I had just posted. Chilling
@royal_throck29834 жыл бұрын
You forgot, "another example is WW1 helmets"
@GrubKiller4364 жыл бұрын
This is exactly what some people mentioned with regards to Steve Job's "follow your dreams" advice. You hear that a lot from successful people. But what you don't hear are the catastrophic stories of those who followed their dreams. In short, advice from successful people are always pretty meh. And that is because of survivorship bias.
@debussychopin27664 жыл бұрын
Wow. That is something I never thought of but always thought that saying was a bit cliche just couldn't put my finger on it.
@izabellasonier74444 жыл бұрын
Some of the best advice I've heard from somebody that shot big, and got successful. 'you should never listen to famous people when they say stuff like 'follow your dreams, and you'll become great like I did', I just got incredibly lucky, as did most others who became rich by following their dreams. Not that they didn't play a role, but If it was all hard work and skill, there would be a lot more rich and famous people. because for every person that reached for the stars and touched them, theres 100 more who went plummeting back to the ground. If you really want to, you should never hesitate to follow your dreams if that's what you really want, but always make sure you've got something to go back to if/when it doesn't work out.'
@skeetsmcgrew32824 жыл бұрын
I suppose in this example the alternative is to not follow your dreams and give up and purposely live a mediocre life. Probably a rational option given the odds. I've been saying for years that we need to stop telling kids they are special and if they work hard they can achieve their goals. But then I imagine going up to a room full of kids and saying "More than likely, statistically speaking, either one or none of you will ever go on to do something great." Oof
@backlog23894 жыл бұрын
I definitely think you can chase your dreams without dieing. Most of the people who chased their dreams and went to college and failed are big Bernie supporters now.
@backlog23894 жыл бұрын
@@izabellasonier7444 some people get lucky. But 90% of the time it's just people working their absolute ass off.
@larrypanellajazzsaxophone8013 Жыл бұрын
The aircraft depicted is a Lockheed PV-1 Ventura, a plane that was used by multiple allied air forces via the lend lease program. My father flew one and was eventually shot down with his crew on their 6th mission. One of their engines got taken out and they managed to crash land in "friendly territory." Very interesting lesson and great engagement with the students!
@garyslayton8340 Жыл бұрын
Huh I figured it was an a-26
@PotatoPatatoVonSpudsworth Жыл бұрын
Had a grandfather who worked at an airbase during the war, helping coordinate bombing runs over various German cities. He never actually saw the impact the bombers had until the war ended, and a pilot offered to fly him over Germany. It was the first time he actually saw the destruction he'd helped create, and it haunted him for the rest of his life. It's one thing to see a demolished city in the middle of wartime, it's another to fly over it after the fighting's stopped, and just contemplate the impact your actions have had on the world.
@JoeOvercoat Жыл бұрын
@@PotatoPatatoVonSpudsworth This is true to this day for a lot of people in the business. For many, they don’t want to know what they’re contributing to. I commend your grandfather for taking that ride. It was healthy that it bothered him. P.S. The Operations Room channel has a handful of great videos on the subject of ‘strategic bombing’ missions.
@Matt-yg8ub Жыл бұрын
Let me guess, they needed a mathematician to let them know that being shot in the engine would be a bad thing, right?
@JoeOvercoat Жыл бұрын
@@Matt-yg8ub I think only a mathematician would think that every shot in every engine and every cockpit shot would be a kill shot because for instance, you’ve got two engines. There’s something really wonky about this data set.
@chesscomsupport86894 жыл бұрын
Plot twist: Actually the other side knew the US was conducting the study, so they told their pilots to only shoot at the areas with the red dots.
@Menaceblue34 жыл бұрын
Luftwaffe intelligence says, *JA! DAS IST GUT!*
@impulsiveDecider4 жыл бұрын
Dun dun duuuuuuuuuuu
@octopusph.d77374 жыл бұрын
lol wtf
@GroundHOG-20104 жыл бұрын
With aircraft it's generally well known to shoot for the pilot, the engines and the wings. But generally an assumption that all areas of an aircraft get an equal enough amount of bullets hit them due to inaccuracy generally holds true enough.
@orangecat30214 жыл бұрын
This is false. You can’t aim where to shoot on a plane when the target is very small
@someonemagical4 жыл бұрын
See also the Toupe Fallacy. "All toupes look fake. Whenever, I see a toupe its so obviously fake." Well, of course you would think that if you're judging all toupes by the ones that you notice. That's not accounting for the toupes that are so realistic you wouldn't notice them if you saw them.
@andrewpanin34354 жыл бұрын
That's a good one. It always puts people off getting them and instead opt for surgery or more expensive options. When really if you get one properly fitted and matched to your skin/original hair color they look quite good.
@UnknownSquid4 жыл бұрын
It's the same thing with the "All vegans are assholes" mentality, and countless other social/ideological groups it easily applies to. If you visited a restaurant every week and shareed it with a vegan couple who simply enjoy their meal like anyone else, you wouldn't even know they were there. Might get along and enjoy their company on occasion none the wiser. If even a single time in many years however, you encountered an aggressively preachy individual who makes a scene, then it's easy for people to form a lasting bias, along with a story that will be told to friends about the "crazy vegan" incident.
@Nevir2024 жыл бұрын
UnknownSquid I don’t quite agree with this assessment, as it implies that there are Graham’s who don’t talk about it at the first opportunity. I’ve literally never had the experience of knowing someone for weeks/months/years and THEN finding out they’re vegan. Even the ones who aren’t lunatics usually end up mentioning it within a day or two of knowing them.
@AnimeCritical4 жыл бұрын
@@Nevir202 and there are those who never told you.
@SerenaBluee4 жыл бұрын
@@Nevir202 It's useful for people whose company you enjoy to know your dietary requirements if you want to get food or coffee with them, so some may inform you purely for that reason. Vegetarians and vegans might want a dairy-alternative milk in their coffee, for instance.
@fitz89234 жыл бұрын
Please... please... to the students, love this teacher. I can't express enough how valuable a teacher that cares about what he is teaching is. They are invaluable to society and to your life personally.
@thegamesforreal16733 жыл бұрын
I'm a science teacher in training and people like this are absolutely role models all teachers should learn from. Just in this short lesson fragment alone; he's engaged with the topic, enthusiastic, and really tries to convey those things to the students. He tells a story in his teaching. He doesn't tell off a student who got the wrong answer and instead tries different ways of presenting the information until, in the students' own words, "it just clicked". Really a shining example of a great lesson here.
@patrickfielding3613 Жыл бұрын
What an amazing teacher!! He explains the subject so well and really interacts with his class in a positive way.. What a great example for us all!!
@Maxcraft124 жыл бұрын
This guys math lesson: WW2 Plane warfare My math teacher in school: Bob takes 2 onions and smashes Susan over the head with them
@Tinfoil_Hardhat4 жыл бұрын
Yeah honestly. Your school should've taught you basic economics instead.
@Maxcraft124 жыл бұрын
@@Tinfoil_Hardhat I majored in economics my friend.
@Tinfoil_Hardhat4 жыл бұрын
@@Maxcraft12 Ha.
@odanemcdonald98744 жыл бұрын
I wanna hear more from your teacher
@TranquillShot4 жыл бұрын
"Let me demonstrate"
@Gl33D3 жыл бұрын
No idea why this was reccomended to me but i wish i had this guy as a teacher when i was in school
@shannonolivas95244 жыл бұрын
Beyond sheer mathematics, this is useful food for thought in terms of critical thinking and the interpretation of information.
@Sigart3 жыл бұрын
Took a university course and they were very particular about this being a thing in _all_ surveys, because you have specific types of people who would be willing to fill out surveys.
@elisam.r.99603 жыл бұрын
This kind of critical thinking is especially needed on platforms like LinkedIn. The posts there positively reek of survivorship bias.
@mariokuttel21073 жыл бұрын
@@elisam.r.9960 mind to explain?
@elisam.r.99603 жыл бұрын
@@mariokuttel2107 You'll see a lot of anecdotes that reflect survivorship bias under the #management and #leadership tags. I unfollowed both of them due to the overabundance of stories like the following link: www.inc.com/benjamin-p-hardy/10-things-unstoppable-people-do-that-average-people-dont.html
@OspreyKnight Жыл бұрын
You are correct saying this is US army. The US Army Air corps would become the US Air Force in 1947, after the war. I love using this as an example of looking at negative space when teaching classes. I do photography classes and I get students that struggle with negative space. Using survivorship bias an example helps more often than you would expect. It tickles the brain to not ignore absence of things, and think of the absence as things in and of themselves.
@MaskOfCinder Жыл бұрын
Glad I wasn't the only one to notice that what he thought was a mistake actually wasn't.
@declanlambert70233 жыл бұрын
almost all shark attacks happen in shallow water. so u might think, being in deeper water would mean u r safer from shark attacks. but infact sharks are much more common in deeper water than shallow water, but whats important, is that humans are much more common in shallow water than deep water, and thus more chances are given for a shark attack to happen in shallow water. i find that pretty interesting and cool, you are less likely to get attacked by a shark in shallow water than in deep water, but at the same time most shark attacks happen in shallow water!
@gorrammit3 жыл бұрын
Apparently, this was also why the Sherman tank was notorious for being a “death trap - more tankers survived a burning Sherman than other tanks of other countries. Those tankers lived to share their horror stories.
@geegaw142 жыл бұрын
Exactly. The Sherman may have burned easier but it was also easier to get out of.
@dorkangel10762 жыл бұрын
I don't know if that works the same way since people watching a tank burn up can also report on it and tanks were rarely fighting on their own. Therefore the evidence isn't just from tank drivers whom it happened to but from the many others who witnessed it.
@dorkangel10762 жыл бұрын
@@PendulumJustice Shooting them til they burn is the same for all tanks making that comparison pointless. If wet storage solved the issue then it had an issue that needed to be solved. 🤷♂️
@ForageGardener2 жыл бұрын
The great uncle George died while trying to escape a disabled american tank during the battle of the bulge in ww2.
@edm240b92 жыл бұрын
@@dorkangel1076 eh, i can see the two being somewhat related. Interestingly, the number of killed US tankers in the European Theater of Operations was under 1,500 KIA. This is because the Sherman was a tank that could be easily escaped when hit. The myth of Shermans being death traps come from Belton Cooper’s book, which shows off survivorship bias from a mechanics POV. He only saw destroyed tanks coming in, never the ones that made it out safely.
@ScaredPilot4 жыл бұрын
Same idea, why do cancer rates go up? Because most people live long enough to have them now. Before they just die early for other reasons.
@MrRafagigapr4 жыл бұрын
And also more people actually find out they have cancer 50 years ago people just died and no one knew why in rural undeveloped areas with low access to medicine
@f.c.laukhard36234 жыл бұрын
@@MrRafagigapr Yep, same reason why tumor rates are up around nuclear power plants even though they are perfectly sealed and no radiation leaks out. People just go to the screenings more often and even harmless tumors are found that grow so slowly that people would not have died from them anyways so nobody would have known had they not done the screening. Also same reason why Turkey for example has so few cases of CoVid-19. Where no tests are done, nobody can be counted as infected. Same in Africa, I fear that it is much more widespread there than most people think, the Chinese companies are very present in huge parts of Africa and almost always bring their own workers in. Also lots of African students in China who probably also visit their families from time to time and could have spread it before it was even known to exist.
@UnknownSquid4 жыл бұрын
@@f.c.laukhard3623 I have wondered how poorer regions such as Africa are handling the virus. I've been surprised to have heard nothing regarding it. I suppose the one small skewed consolation for somewhere like Africa is that the life expectancy is only 61M/65F, meaning even if it's widespread, there are perhaps less people vulnerable to it.
@f.c.laukhard36234 жыл бұрын
@@UnknownSquid Would not count on that. Younger people are not as vulnerable but still often need hospitalisation, often enough involving respiratory machines and I doubt that the density of those are as high in Burkina Faso as they are in Taiwan. The low death rates in younger age groups we see so far was under rather good circumstances (in Hubei where the situation was more severe due to more cases, the death/case ratio was higher than in other regions of China with enough capacities for the fewer cases). I also suspect that the circumstances leading to the lower life expectancy also affect your health earlier on. It is not as if Africans lead a perfectly healthy life up to their 60s and then just drop dead all of a sudden. Now that might not move the curve in a way that 60 year olds there have the same problems as 80 year olds in South Korea but it probably leads at least to a slight shift in that regard. But well, this is all speculation and we probably will never know for sure.
@UnknownSquid4 жыл бұрын
@@f.c.laukhard3623 Fair points. Can only hope they handle it alright. Though I suppose Corona is hardly the most of their worries, with the other prevalent diseases the continent already suffers at large.
@kgun30 Жыл бұрын
The way his class gets involved is a real sign that most of his lessons are this good
@iron22914 жыл бұрын
Even though I already knew the information being provided, he was so engaging that I watched the whole thing anyway. What an excellent teacher.
@SellusionStar4 жыл бұрын
"Excuse me, how often does planes crash?" -"Just once."
@Subuzgreatest3 жыл бұрын
Unless it's a paper plane 😏 Ba dum tss
@Tjalve703 жыл бұрын
I have heard that the planes in Spain crash mainly in the rain.
@SellusionStar3 жыл бұрын
@@Tjalve70 xD
@vaclav_fejt3 жыл бұрын
I think there are old warbirds that do crash from time to time and it's not always a complete write-off - and there is an incentive to keep if flying, because it's a frikkin warbird, the coolest plane there is! So people pour money into them and yes, such planes can crash more than once...
@SellusionStar3 жыл бұрын
@@vaclav_fejt True that!
@nonegiven28304 жыл бұрын
This also applies to entrepreneurs in capitalism. We hear a lot of stories about how people made their millions\billions and lots of "these habits millionaires have" but we rarely have that put in context of people who also tried and failed.
@EU-op3db4 жыл бұрын
@@derekakaderek Language! Also it's pretty clear you don't understand their argument. Your comment is full of non sequiturs.
@daniel3552734 жыл бұрын
@@derekakaderek Depending on the scenario, it's a weak version of a lottery winner saying "Liquidize your assets, buy lottery tickets. It works!"
@EU-op3db4 жыл бұрын
@@derekakaderek I only feel the need to tell you, that you are wrong, and to name the logical fallacy you used.
@bro7484 жыл бұрын
@@derekakaderek _"1st your assuming no millionaire earned their wealth"_ The original commenter never assumed this. _"the data from these surviving planes are directly misleading designers, entrepreneurs aren't purposely wasting money and making bad decisions yet still ending up rich."_ You seem to be confusing 'misleading' with 'leading to the opposite conclusion.' Misleading is defined by Google as _"giving the wrong idea or impression."_ 'Wrong' does *not* equal 'opposite.' In the plane example the designers are led to the opposite conclusion, but survivorship bias does take place even when the information is simply wrong. The example the original commenter gave is actually the same example that appear right above the plane example in the Wikipedia article about survivorship bias. I'm not particularly good with words, so I will simply quote the Wikipedia page. "popular media often tells the story of the determined individual who pursues their dreams and beats the odds. There is much less focus on the many people that may be similarly skilled and determined but fail to ever find success because of factors beyond their control or other (seemingly) random events.[9] This creates a false public perception that anyone can achieve great things if they have the ability and make the effort. The overwhelming majority of failures are not visible to the public eye, and only those who survive the selective pressures of their competitive environment are seen regularly." Ps, your grammar usage makes it extremely hard to figure out what you mean. I try to avoid being a 'grammar nazi,' but it took me five minutes to figure out what you meant in the second sentence.I also don't understand your final comparison at all, although I don't think that's due to grammar, but rather due to it being extremely vague.
@haliax81494 жыл бұрын
It's a fairish point, but you fail to realize that there are undeniable trait similarities in successful people. Keep in mind, success includes people in the 250k/year range too. Some of the predictors are intelligence with a sense of reality, creativity, and motivation.
@turretwhisperer Жыл бұрын
¡ love that you let the students discuss and not necessarily have to raise a hand to formulate ideas and questions in your classroom, sees a lot more intuitive and like a free discussion
@annoybot4 жыл бұрын
3:07 "If . . . you don't come back, to be a data point." = the vividly "missing piece" in "success stories"
@TheNebraska4024 жыл бұрын
Exactly. Annoying to hear stories of "I can do it and so can you". Well, a lot have tried and you're the only one that made it work
@WrecklessEating3 жыл бұрын
This was pretty interesting.
@Hongobogologomo3 жыл бұрын
Matt?!
@BlurpleTree3 жыл бұрын
was not expecting to see WrecklessEating here
@ionshiese70063 жыл бұрын
Yes
@justamanofculture123 жыл бұрын
Verified must like
@JO-vb4vh4 жыл бұрын
I was listening to the lecture, then it stopped at 6:09. I became sad so suddenly. Wow, this guy is good at teaching.
@mavoc30944 жыл бұрын
Make the Teaching Profession Great Again
@thatanimeweirdo4 жыл бұрын
I graduated last year and listening to this was actually fun... Thought I'd have enough after 1.5 decades of school
@pastychomper49394 жыл бұрын
He might have been good at teaching, or he might have got lucky with this one lesson. It's the only one I've seen recommended on KZbin. 😉
@azoniarnl33624 жыл бұрын
@Straight Razor Daddy Thats what history teachers are for.
@Alucard-gt1zf4 жыл бұрын
@@pastychomper4939 there's more and in every one he's amazing
@PhilTaylorPhotog Жыл бұрын
If my statistics lecturer had approached the subject like this I might have passed. 70% of students failed and we were all getting HDs in other subjects…applied teaching is so important. Well done.
@wiryantirta4 жыл бұрын
“GOOD ON YA” You barely came back from a long range meat grinder bombing mission over Normandy with a chewed up plane and this is the first thing your Wing Commander says.
@SpadeRZA4 жыл бұрын
Your plane's got bullet damage, like, good on ya!
@DavidPumpernickel4 жыл бұрын
ah god that's hilarious.
@SebAnders4 жыл бұрын
My survey suggests that nobody has ever lost their heads to a shark attack.
@cybersilver58164 жыл бұрын
And that's a logical conclusion to reach when you only look at the data you receive from survivors.
@naverilllang4 жыл бұрын
I have
@ruskibot77454 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure if that's ever actually happened, I mean yeah it is definitely possible but idk if headless corpses have ever washed up on the beach. There isn't a whole lot of good yum yums in the head, but legs are quite good(from the shark's POV)
@jamiedel27073 жыл бұрын
Imagine how much we would learn and enjoy school if we had teachers like him who actually look like they are enjoying themselves
@B3Band2 жыл бұрын
Imagine how much we would learn if idiots didn't burn out every single teacher in the basic classes on the way to this advanced one.
@ikr93582 жыл бұрын
Imagine how good the teachers would be if they weren't overworked and underpaid.
@fleeplayTV2 жыл бұрын
I really can't imagine being passionate about giving the same lessons 500 times maybe the first 3-4 years but after I'm checked out
@marwanssalem2 жыл бұрын
It's these interestng real life topic that are fun and should be taught
@ikr93582 жыл бұрын
@josh Do you have any experience teaching?
@davefontanilla37032 жыл бұрын
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"
@clover86733 жыл бұрын
This is the perfect example of a teacher applying real world problems to lessons that seem as though they have no purpose
@frothyjazz74252 жыл бұрын
His cadence and genuine excitement about the topic has me invested, and I'm not even in the room. Seems like an amazing Teacher.
@B1SQ1T4 жыл бұрын
Teacher: what do you see here Students: bullets, ice, etc. Me: plane chicken pox
@TheIndogamer4 жыл бұрын
"I diagnosed your Beaufighter Mk. 5 and it appears to have chicken pox."
@marigo8564 жыл бұрын
@@TheIndogamer should have gotten plane vaccines
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
marigo8 You mean 'shots' ...
@gia2574 жыл бұрын
laser show
@lyler.10824 жыл бұрын
@@TheIndogamer it's a lockheed hudson
@morrischristopher53666 ай бұрын
The patience, plan and engagement defines You’re an amazing teacher. Thanks for being one of those awesome souls that share.
@robopollo093 жыл бұрын
I LOVE the vibes of this teacher. He is the master of teaching, does everything right: clearness, allows interventions and puts attention to them so he can keep them inside the class. It is absolutely AWESOME, he is the main thing ongoing in the classroom!