Mod-08 Lec-20 Fourier transforms (Part I)

[@jimshilleto5655]

I had a hard time following in places but could find details elsewhere. Anything he teaches is worth studying. As I age my brain doesn't work as well as earlier but his seems never to slow down. A Mozart of his subject!

[@meme_engineering4521]

He's making a mockery of what we think is extremely complicated

[@YourMakingMeNervous]

He is a fantastic teacher!

[@mr.rachetphilanthrophist601]

how quickly and in slick way he did that contour integration ...i loved it....i mean yeah...he is superb teacher and is very very talented.person ..he also explained dirichlet sufficient condition for fourier transform to exist ,very quickly and nicely ...............his speed is so good .i love it......

[@Pukhu_21]

linking of teaching concepts with it's application in physics was most interesting part of it🙂

[@harshrs3136]

If we see at 2.0x speed he sounds exactly like shah rukh khan.

[@SumitYadav-mx8bp]

😂😂😂👌👌👌

[@aniketmisra9617]

totally.....

[@brilliabenny8222]

True😂

[@Captainpast6]

Sounds like dying Devdas at 0.25

[@abhisheksrivastav2102]

Seriously

[@ghanashyamsharma8399]

How beautifully he played the equation.

[@soumyajitmandal4499]

This is called writing poem in Physics..... Very few profs can only do it successfully.... Found him after Feynman

[@farhanakhan3747]

Very nice way of teaching sir

[@kushagrasachan8933]

9:11 "That's not good news." Yes, sire, we take your word.

[@selvakumar3k]

Ha haa..

[@zuhoorelahi3904]

Sir! You style of teaching ♡

[@bhabanisankar4439]

Nice explanation balki sir .loved your video as always

[@parameshwarhazra2725]

Bhabani sir you like balki sir. Even I like him too.❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@elamvaluthis7268]

Amplitude decreases 1/X very nice explanation.

[@elizath1511]

I had to watch this in 0.75x speed. He's teaching really fast 😅😅😅

[@dolagobindananda6525]

Living god

[@RAJIBLOCHANDAS]

Nice

[@mukeshsah3194]

Lecture is Excellent but Video is not Good....Camara Should focused on board not on teacher

[@elizath1511]

Yeahh...I had a hard time copying the notes 😅😅

[@manojprabhakar9111]

This lecture made me realize the limitations of my brain. Somehow made me feel like a feeble minded creature

[@shantanubanerjee4196]

Rapid movement of camera..pls focus on board..

[@pramod120895]

He is really mocking those (including me) who find these topics so confusing through his intuitive arguments over the steps of derivation

[@KrishnaSridharan]

One must understand what is the purpose of fourier transform. First this has to be explained before all those mathematical symbols. Lecturer seems to be very wise but must be able to speak in a language that a student would understand . F(x) , g (x), discontinuities.,.....delta funtions.... Pls dont use mathematical jargons!!

[@piyushuniyal6129]

Actually this class is meant to be an advance course in mathematical physics so you'd expect they know the basic terminologies.

[@KrishnaSridharan]

Whether it is advanced or basic it can be said in a better way. That's why no one appreciates this when something that can be explained in simple manner is made to look like that it is very complicated.

[@piyushuniyal6129]

@@KrishnaSridharan Actually if you have taken a basic course in Fourier and Laplace transforms, this is not hard in any way. You bump into these terms so often that it will come natural to you.

[@KrishnaSridharan]

@@piyushuniyal6129 Sir, I am an offshore structural engineer with 22 years of work experience. I apologise if my comment is not appropriate. My intention is only to make it better. I know what 9s fourier transform as we use it in our daily work. I understand what he says but others will not.

[@piyushuniyal6129]

@@KrishnaSridharan I am sorry too. Yes I agree that the lecture could have touched a bit more on the applications and visualization part.

[@d.nehareddy7679]

🙏🙏🙏🙏♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️

[@abhijeetghodgaonkar]

yo

[@niravrajput2208]

Jorrrrrrdarrrrrr Sur, Magggggnetttic😂😂😂😂

[@bapinmirdha7898]

very bad cameraman

[@panemchandra4310]

Not good he too fast at teaching i cant understand it

[@saratchoudhury3718]

he has no mathematical rigour

[@torresfan1143]

hmm.. he's theoretical physicist by the way so you might wanna check your statement

[@itsanki]

Lecture is on mathematical physics, not mathematics. For rigour you can read math texts